HIGHLIGHTS. Executive Summary



Similar documents
Cisco Data Center Virtualization Assessment Service

Cisco Director Class SAN Planning and Design Service

Cisco Virtual Desktop Infrastructure Planning and Design Service

Release Notes for Cisco IronPort Security Plug-in 7.1

Medical Data Exchange A New Approach to Healthcare Interoperability

Release Notes for Cisco IronPort Security Plug-in 7.2

Cisco Smar t Busines s Communications System IP Phone Por tfolio

Cisco Data Center Architecture Assessment Service

Cisco TelePresence Solutions

PCI Compliance: Improve Payment Security

Cisco Data Center Business Continuity Planning Service

Cisco Unified Reporting Administration Guide

Cisco IronPort M-Series Security Management Appliance

Accessibility Guidelines for Cisco Unified Contact Center Management Portal

How To Create A Security Solution For Retail Banking

Cisco Unified Attendant Console Backup and Restore Guide

Cisco UCS B200 M1 and UCS B250 M1 Blade Servers. Table 1 compares the features of the Cisco UCS B-Series Blade Servers.

Cisco WAP4410N Wireless-N Access Point: PoE/Advanced Security Cisco Small Business Access Points

Best Practices for Monitoring Cisco Unity Devices with Cisco Unified Operations Manager

Cisco Aironet Dual Band MIMO Low Profile Ceiling Mount Antenna (AIR-ANT2451NV-R)

Analog Channel Re-Creation Using the Digital Service Access Node

Configuring Cisco Unified Communications Manager for the NovaTec TransNova S3 Voice Gateway

Authentication on the Cisco IronPort Web Security Appliance

How To Use The Cisco Cisco Uu 560 (Cisco U560) For A Phone Or Computer (Cio 560)

Terminal Services Overview

Cisco IronPort Hosted and Hybrid Hosted Security Services

Cisco Small Form-Factor Pluggable Modules for Gigabit Ethernet Applications

Cisco Unified Wireless IP Phone 7925G Accessory Guide

Cisco IronPort Encryption Appliance Release Notes

Cisco Unified Wireless IP Phone 7925G Accessory Guide

Danish Train Operator Gets Customer Service Back On Track

Hardware and System Software Specification for Cisco Unified Web and Interaction Manager

Configuring the SA 500 for Active Directory Authentication of VPN Clients 2. Establishing a SSL VPN Connection By Using a Different Port Number 35

Cisco 100-Megabit Ethernet SFP Modules Compatibility Matrix

Transferring Files Using HTTP or HTTPS

Technology Comparison: Cisco Overlay Transport Virtualization and Virtual Private LAN Service as Enablers of LAN Extensions

Cisco TelePresence System 3010

Cisco Unified Videoconferencing 5100 & 5200 Series Products

Cisco Unified Contact Center Express Port Utilization Guide

Design Guide for the Cisco Unified Videoconferencing Solution Using Desktop Component Release 7.1

Cisco Unified IP Phone 6901 and 6911 User Guide for Cisco Unified Communications Manager 8.0 (SCCP)

Next-Generation Cisco Unified Communications Platform Accelerates Return on Investment. White Paper

Cisco IronPort X1070 Security System

Cisco AP 541N Wireless Access Point Part of the Cisco Small Business Pro Series

Cisco IronPort C370 for Medium-Sized Enterprises and Satellite Offices

Cisco TelePresence System 3210

Release Notes for Cisco Support Tools Release 2.4(1)

Cipher Suites and WEP

Securing Manufacturing Computing and Controller Assets

Connecting Cisco Serial High-Speed WAN Interface Cards

Cisco Registered Envelope Recipient Guide

Cisco Network Planning Solution Documentation Guide and Supplemental License Agreement

Cisco Fabric Manager 5.0: Visibility and Control for the Unified Data Center

Connecting Cisco Fast Ethernet ISDN PRI Network Modules to the Network

Cisco Aironet 5-GHz MIMO 6-dBi Patch Antenna (AIR-ANT5160NP-R)

Chapter 7 10 Gigabit Ethernet Connectivity with Microsoft Windows Servers

Cisco Cloud Security: Choosing the Right Security Deployment

Installation Guide for Cisco Unified Videoconferencing Manager Release 7.1

Cisco WebEx Enabled TelePresence Configuration Guide

Cisco Unified Communications

How to Register, Start, and Access a Cisco Online Exam

System Message Logging

Cisco Smart Care Services Questions and Answers About the Voice Quality Monitor Service

CISCO SMALL AND MEDIUM BUSINESS CLASS VOICE SOLUTIONS: CISCO CALLMANAGER EXPRESS BUNDLES

How To Install A Cisco Cisco Cs (Windows) On A Hard Drive With A Harddrive (Windows 3.3) On An External Hard Drive (Windows 2003) On Your Computer (Windows 2007)

User Guide for Cisco Unified MeetingPlace Web Conferencing

Cisco HealthPresence User Guide

Cisco Certification Skills Matrix

Cisco Virtual Desktop Infrastructure Strategy Service

Production Software Within Manufacturing Reference Architectures

NetApp Storage Deployment Guide

Incorporating Managed Services into an Enterprise Architecture Strategy

NETWORK AVAILABILITY IMPROVEMENT SUPPORT OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS

Cisco IPICS Dispatch Console User Guide

Release Notes for Cisco IronPort AsyncOS for

Cisco IP Phone 7961G/7961G-GE and 7941G/7941G-GE Enhancements

Release Notes for Cisco IronPort AsyncOS for

Data Center Infrastructure Design Guide 2.1 Readme File

Installation and Configuration Guide Cisco Unified CRM Connector for SAP

Cisco Router and Security Device Manager File Management

Upgrading to the Cisco ubr7246vxr Universal Broadband Router

Course Booklet. CCNA Discovery Networking for Home and Small Businesses. Version 4.0. ciscopress.com

USER GUIDE Cisco Small Business Pro

Transcription:

General Motors Prepares for Future with Next-Generation Information Networks for Global Manufacturing Operations; On Track to Achieve 166% ROI Over Five Years HIGHLIGHTS CUSTOMER PROFILE Region: North America Industry: Automobile Manufacturing Employees: 235, worldwide Business Issue: Plant-floor IT network optimization BACKGROUND One of the world s largest automakers Operates in 14 countries; its largest markets are the U.S., China, Brazil, the UK, Canada, Russia and Germany Brands include Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, GMC, GM Daewoo, Holden, Opel, Vauxhall and Wuling GOAL Accelerate entry into emerging markets, improve product quality and realize cost efficiencies by creating a globally integrated, standards-based engineering and manufacturing platform SOLUTION GM s Plant Floor Controls Network (PFCN) Solution, including: CiscoWorks Network Management Suite Cisco Unified Collaborations Server Catalyst 65 Catalyst 375 Catalyst 2955 Catalyst 296 RESULTS Projected 166% ROI over 5 years Gained $75M in lost unit profit contribution Reduced network downtime by 75% Gained more than $21M in design engineering staff savings Gained more than $53M in network operations staff savings Gained $5M in inventory carrying cost savings Executive Summary One of the world s iconic automakers, General Motors continues to be a force to be reckoned with in the global auto industry. The company has sharpened its strategic focus in recent years and is now moving aggressively to seize high-growth opportunities in emerging markets such as Asia, and redoubling efforts to improve product quality and boost operating efficiencies to drive down costs. To execute this strategy, GM embraced a globally unified business model that emphasized the deployment of highly standardized engineering and manufacturing platforms that could be easily implemented and supported in any market around the world. The global, standards-based operating model would accelerate GM s move into emerging markets and generate efficiencies and cost savings through the use of common infrastructure components and processes. Among other initiatives designed to support the new unified operating model, GM invested in information technologies to more tightly integrate its manufacturing plants across the globe, control costs, and accelerate the introduction of new communications and collaboration applications. Key to this strategy was the implementation of a modern, standardsbased network architecture called the Plant Floor Controls Network (PFCN) at more than 15 GM manufacturing plants worldwide. Page 1 of 9

Based on a single set of Cisco-based network designs and equipment, the PFCN solution replaced GM s aging and heavily customized legacy networks that were becoming increasingly unreliable, as well as difficult and expensive to maintain. The move to the PFCN solution enabled GM to standardize the design of each plant network and establish a single engineering team that monitors and troubleshoots network operations globally. The result: network downtime has dropped by about 7%, leading to fewer unplanned work stoppages on the plant floor. Furthermore, GM now needs two-thirds fewer network engineers and analysts to support the same number of plants. The standardized Cisco network design also helped GM rationalize and reduce its legacy inventory of network devices and spare parts, cutting inventory carrying costs by 7%. It also allowed GM to create cost-efficient global applications that can be rolled out to plants quickly, and to automate system-management tasks like upgrades and patches. As a result, GM now spends 3% less time managing plant software. According to a conservative analysis by Mainstay Partners, GM s investment in the Cisco-based PFCN solution will generate a return on investment (ROI) of 166%. 1 The full range of benefits is illustrated in Figure 1 and include: $21.2 million in labor cost savings from more efficient deployment of network engineers $53.9 million in labor cost saving from more efficient deployment of network operations analysts $16.4 million one-time savings from faster, network setups at each plant $5.4 million cost reductions from leaner inventory management $76.3 million in lost unit profit contribution from higher network uptime Figure 1. GM s Plant Floor Communications Network Benefit Drivers PFCN Will Drive $173M in Benefits (5 Year Estimates) Network Engineering Labor Savings $21.2M Lost Unit Profit Contribution $76.3M Network Operations Labor Savings $53.9M Network Spares Inventory Savings $5.4M Plant Network Deployment Savings $16.4M Looking ahead, the easily replicated and managed PFCN platform is expected to help GM advance quickly into new markets, and several international joint venture partners have already adopted the PFCN solution. GM will also rely on the Cisco platform to support a range of IP-enabled technology initiatives, including enhanced plant-floor mobility applications and collaborative engineering solutions that connect front-line engineers with experts located anywhere in the world. 1 This conservative ROI figure is based on estimated net benefits of $6.5 million over five years, and excludes benefits from higher network uptime. An alternative total cost of ownership analysis, which factors in uptime benefits as well as full deployment costs, results in estimated net benefits of $111.8 million and an ROI of 182% over five years. Page 2 of 9

Key Success Factors GM credits its successful move from concept to implementation to several factors: Maintain Close Relationship between Manufacturing Operations and IT. As manufacturing plants continue to become more complex, networked and collaborative, it s critical to build strong relationships between the manufacturing engineers who manage the plant-floor devices and the network engineers who provide the IT systems that make them run. Design for the Future. Instead of an incremental approach, GM s IT teams designed the network to integrate new technologies to support anticipated growth for years to come, including the planned incorporation of as QoS, security, and multimedia applications. Prove the Capabilities of PFCN in Stages. Manufacturing executives tend to be conservative and skeptical in nature, so GM first performed exhaustive engineering and testing on the network design before piloting the PFCN design in two plants. The pilots demonstrated that the team could not only deploy a new network to a plant in less than two months at a low, well-defined cost, but also deploy the PFCN solution in parallel to scale the solution globally. Choose the Right Partners. With network engineering expertise from Cisco and its partners, GM was able to define a standard template with guidelines for plants around the world. Cisco and its partners engineers were also an integral part of the overall support model as well, providing tier-3 level engineering support when advanced networking expertise was required. The Opportunity Despite current economic challenges, GM has set its sights squarely on the future with a master plan called One Company a unifying strategy that aims to better integrate GM s engineering, manufacturing and sales operations worldwide. The goal is to create a highly efficient and flexible business platform that will allow GM to design globally, manufacture anywhere, and sell everywhere. A key component of this strategy has been a multi-year initiative designed to modernize and standardize the information networks that support GM s global manufacturing plants. These complex networks are essential to keeping GM s plants running smoothly: they control the automated machines and programmable devices on the factory floor as well as the communications infrastructure that allows managers to oversee production and collaborate with engineers and partners worldwide. GM stood to gain significant benefits by upgrading its legacy networks. Based on outdated technology and aging equipment, the old environment posed growing operational challenges for GM s factories. Network outages were occurring more frequently, often leading to plant downtime and higher per-unit costs. The legacy networks also lacked the technology needed to run the next generation of plant-floor automation equipment that features IP-based intelligent network and quality of service (QoS) capabilities. Other opportunities for improving efficiencies, such as applications that allow engineers to collaborate remotely, would require the same advanced networking infrastructure. GM also saw the potential for cutting costs through standardization. GM s old networks were built with a variety of proprietary and plant-specific designs, so each factory had its own customized architecture along with a unique set of equipment requirements and bills of materials (BOMs). Managing these diverse networks required the support of a larger-than-necessary staff of design engineers and operating personnel. Economies of scale were hard to achieve because the engineering expertise at one plant couldn t easily be leveraged to support other facilities. The lack of network standards also forced plants to stock a wider assortment of backup gear, which kept inventory costs high Page 3 of 9

The Solution: GM s Cisco-based Plant Floor Controls Network (PFCN) Seeking to capitalize on opportunities for driving down costs and improving service levels, GM developed plans for a comprehensive overhaul of IT networks at its manufacturing facilities around the world. The new platform called the Plant Floor Communications Network (PFCN) would implement a single set of network-design standards worldwide and use the latest networking technologies and equipment from Cisco Systems 2. To date, the PFCN solution has been implemented at more than 15 GM plants across all its major markets. By establishing a standard network template that can be replicated at every plant around the world, the PFCN solution allowed engineers to design and build networks more quickly than before. Since the basic designs are the same in every plant, network analysts can monitor and troubleshoot networks at virtually any location. Inter-plant monitoring tools were built into the PFCN platform to facilitate remote visibility into dozens of plants from a central facility. The move enabled GM to both save money and speed fixes by consolidating engineering services in each region. The standardized PFCN solution was designed to minimize the network-device footprint at each plant and reduce the total number of parts or stock-keeping units (SKUs) held in inventory. Today, only five standard devices are deployed at each plant, which means GM can stock fewer backup devices and parts overall and hold more inventory in cost-effective regional warehouses. Although it enforces a standard logical network architecture or VLAN for each plant, the PFCN solution allows engineers to implement a variety of local physical setups to ensure optimal network performance at a particular plant. The solution includes guidelines that help engineers design both large and small-scale versions of the network. Because it employs intelligent networking capabilities from Cisco, the PFCN solution provides a significantly more reliable and fault-tolerant platform compared to GM s legacy environment. As detailed below, network downtime has been reduced dramatically, contributing to reductions in GM s per-unit manufacturing costs. Furthermore, the new IP-based networks will enable GM to keep pace with new advances in plant-floor devices such as programmable logic controllers (PLCs), which increasingly incorporate IP technology. In addition, PFCN will help GM integrate future communication applications that facilitate high-efficiency collaboration among its workforce while minimizing the risks associated with these deployments. Figure 2. GM s Plant Floor Communications Network Solution Standard Engineering Templates Platform for Future Applications Hierarchical network design guidelines streamlined individual plant design requirements while providing high security and intelligent fault tolerance Minimal Network Device Footprint Global Transparency/ Visibility GM stays ahead of future IP-based plant devices and collaborative engineering solutions to be introduced in the plants Plant designs reduced the total number of network SKUs in the plant to under 5 unique devices Inter-plant network monitoring tools created significant efficiencies for the network analysts supporting the plants 2 Contributing Cisco products listed in the Executive Summary on page 1. Page 4 of 9

PFCN is a tremendous engineering accomplishment for GM. Standardizing plant networks has reduced costs, improved uptime and provided a flexible platform for future applications such as collaborative engineering Nick Bell, Program Information Officer, Global Manufacturing & Labor Today, about 9% of GM s plants encompassing 22 million square feet of floor space are running on new PFCN networks, which were deployed over a 32-month period. GM management made the decision to deploy PFCN after becoming convinced of the serious risks posed by delaying upgrades to aging network equipment, and after reviewing a business case that calculated significant benefits from a move to PFCN, including increased plant uptime and lower total ownership costs. Before green-lighting a global implementation, however, GM piloted the platform at one plant in each region. The success of these pilots secured final buy-in from senior executives, and GM moved forward with a phased implementation starting in 24, as detailed in Figure 3. Figure 3. PFCN Implementation Timeline (24 Today) Game Changer LEVEL 3 Stragic PFCN 1. Advanced Security & In-Network Firewalls PFCN 2. VoIP PFCN 3. Video/Next Generation Cores LEVEL 2 Hardened PFCN.85 Highly Redundant Network Global VLAN strategy Real-Time Plant Controls LEVEL 1 24 26 28 Approx. 22M Sq Ft of Plant Floor Space Deployed PFCN.85 PFCN 1. PFCN 2. PFCN 3. Focused on developing an highly redundant, global VLAN capability with real-time network performance to the Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs) devices on the manufacturing floor. Enhanced network security through both market leading technologies and a global software patch/ replace program that accelerated timeto-production and minimized risks of downtime. Through Cisco s integrated suite of VoIP, QoS and Layer-3 networking equipment, GM is deploying VoIP to the plant floor to enhance collaboration. Future of plant floor operations will include video linkage from the floor to engineering and suppliers. Page 5 of 9

The engineering and operational standardization built into the PFCN platform served to lower the risk and costs associated with large-scale technology deployments. The standard platform will also help GM accelerate the future rollout of network enhancements and new technologies, such as mobile applications and collaborative engineering platforms, that will boost productivity further all at a lower marginal cost and reduced risk. $53M in Labor Productivity Benefits According to an analysis by Mainstay Partners, GM is on track to realize more than $21 million over five years in network engineering labor savings from its PFCN investment. The savings reflect a two-thirds reduction in the number of level-3 design engineers GM needs to support its global PFCN platform, as shown in Figure 4. Drawing on a single set of design templates, engineers working in the PFCN environment can create the logical design of a plant network in one day, compared to three-to-four weeks previously. During the initial design phase of the global PFCN network, these efficiencies generated one-time savings of approximately $1, per plant. PFCN allowed GM to set up a single, global engineering team that monitors networks around the world in a follow the sun operation. Level-3 design engineers can support a plant anywhere in the world because all the networks share the same logical architecture. Figure 4. Number of Network Design Engineers per Plant.4.3.2.1..3 Legacy 67% Reduction.1 PFCN In addition to the design-engineering savings, GM is expected to save more than $53 million (over five years) by streamlining the day-to-day operation and maintenance of the networks. Again, PFCN s standardized networking environment, combined with inter-network visibility, contributed to these savings, allowing GM to support its plants with one-third as many onsite network operations staff, as shown in Figure 5. Today, on average, large plants can be serviced by just two network analysts and smaller plants by one analyst. (In some cases, a single analyst can service more than one small plant.) Figure 5: Number of Global Network Analysts 4 3 2 1 36 Legacy 67% Reduction 12 PFCN $76M in Increased Profit Contribution from Improved Manufacturing Uptime With its built-in redundancies, high-availability and management features, the PFCN design ensured that the network would no longer be the leading cause of plant downtime. (In the past, network outages were responsible for 7% of unplanned IT production stoppages.) The system s monitoring tools, for example, minimize network outages by helping engineers detect and address issues before they become critical. Since implementing the Cisco platform, GM has seen a 75% drop in network outages from about 11, minutes to 2,5 minutes per year and current factory network uptime is now running at 99.99989%. Better uptime performance is helping GM improve operating Page 6 of 9

margins by reducing the per-unit costs incurred when its manufacturing lines experience unplanned downtime. Mainstay estimated that higher network uptime will help GM generate $76 million in lost unit profit contribution over five years. Figure 6 shows the reduction in network outages and the associated dollar impact of improved uptime over that period. Figure 6: Network Outage Improvements & Associated Lost Unit Profit Impact Lost Unit Profit Impact ($M/Yr) 3 Plant Network Outages (Minutes/Yr) 12,5 2 11,24 26 23 21 1, 7,5 1 5,768 14 5, 2,33 2,753 2,5 2,5 24 25 26 27 28 $5.4M in Spare Inventory Savings GM has generated significant savings by shrinking the size of its inventory of spare networking parts and holding a greater percentage of spares in cost-effective regional facilities instead of at local plants. The move to a leaner inventory was the direct result of PFCN s simpler, standardized design, which allowed GM to build networks with a smaller set of parts, or bill of materials (BOM), and enabled plants to hold fewer SKUs in inventory. Better system monitoring tools also helped GM better forecast the need for replacement parts, allowing it to move key components, such as Cisco Catalyst 65 switches, to regional distribution centers. As a result, GM can now stock 7% fewer spares overall, saving an estimated $5.4 million in inventory carrying costs over five years, as shown in Figures 7 and 8. Figure 7: Reduction in Spares Inventory (Indexed) Figure 8: Reduction in Carrying Costs, 24-8 ($M) 1% 8 6 1% 7% Reduction $1.5M 1. $.9M $1.3M $1.2M $1.1M $1.M 4 2 3%.5 Legacy PFCN. 24 25 26 27 28 Page 7 of 9

Plant Floor Application Management Efficiencies The PFCN platform, with its reliable, standardsbased network architecture, gave GM engineers the ability to build and deploy a set of global software applications that can run on any local network. Also, because engineers no longer need to research individual network configurations and customizations, GM dramatically reduced the time it takes to deploy applications to its global facilities, as shown in Figure 9. The new standard applications helped GM generate further productivity improvements by providing efficient system-management capabilities, including remote application Figure 9: Time to Deploy Applications (Indexed) 1% monitoring and automated software patches and upgrades. As a result, GM estimates that it spends 3% less time managing software across its global networks. 8 6 4 2 1% Legacy 3x 4x Reduction.3% PFCN Future Opportunities Beyond the initial operational efficiencies and cost savings gained from the PFCN solution, GM expects to leverage the Cisco-based platform to support a range of new technology initiatives and enhancements. These include: Enhanced Mobility Applications. PFCN is an ideal platform for deploying advanced mobile technologies on the plant floor, including wireless handheld devices that will connect front-line engineers with design engineering teams at a distance. Such technologies will expand the types of information that can be shared over mobile devices to include CAD drawings and other high-bandwidth content. More Standards-based Applications. GM plans to further reduce complexity and costs by replacing even more proprietary manufacturing applications with standards IP-based, plug-andplay solutions that are easily integrated into the PFCN architecture. Collaborative Engineering Solutions. Connecting the plant floor to the right resources to solve problems is the goal of collaborative engineering. PFCN s native connectivity capabilities including support for VoIP and video will make it possible for GM to bring together engineers from diverse locations and organizations, including suppliers, to rapidly troubleshoot issues and devise solutions. Quantified Business Benefits According to Mainstay s analysis, GM s investment in the Cisco-based PFCN solution will generate $6.5 million in net benefits over five years, and yield an ROI of 166%. The benefits include labor savings from more efficient deployment of network engineers and analysts, one-time network setup savings at each plant, and inventory carrying cost reductions. Total net benefits increase to $136.8 million if the benefits of higher network uptime ($76.3 million) are included in the analysis. 3 A summary of the incremental costs and benefits of the PFCN investment are displayed in Figure 1. 4 Using an alternative full deployment cost approach, Mainstay analyzed the PFCN investment by factoring in the full costs of designing, equipping and installing the new platform as opposed to analyzing only the incremental costs that were incurred over and above replacing the existing 3 The most conservative analysis would exclude the uptime savings, since GM could have achieved similar uptime performance by replacing the aging network devices alone rather than investing in the completely re-architected PFCN solution. 4 In this analysis, costs represent the incremental costs of designing and deploying the standardized and re-architected PFCN solution -- that is, over and above the costs of only replacing the existing networking equipment. Page 8 of 9

equipment. In this model, the investment costs are somewhat higher, but total net benefits increase from $6.5 million to $111.8 million due to the addition of $76.3 million in network uptime benefits. GM s ROI in this scenario is estimated at 182% with an internal return on investment (IRR) of 7%. Figure 1. Net Present Value Analysis Five-Year Net Present Value Analysis ($M) $15M $76.3M $136.8M 1 $5.4M 5 $53.9M $6.5M -$3.M -$33.4M -$36.4M $21.2M $16.4M -5 Engineering Dsign Incremental Network Spend Total Investments Network Engineers Plant Setup Network Analyst Spare Inventory Total Net Benefit Lost Units Total w/cost Avoidance About This Case Study Research and analysis for this study was conducted by Mainstay Partners LLC, an independent consulting firm that has performed over 3 studies for leading information technology providers including Cisco, Oracle, SAP, Microsoft, Dell, Lexmark, HP, BearingPoint, EMC, NetApp, EDS and Tidal Software. This case study was based on interviews with the retailer s executives, IT executives and IT planning personnel, review of project planning documents, and searches of industry literature. ROI calculations use industry standard assumptions regarding the time value of money. Information contained in the publication has been obtained from sources considered reliable, but is not warranted by Mainstay Partners LLC. Americas Headquarters Cisco Systems, Inc. San Jose, CA Asia Pacific Headquarters Cisco Systems (USA) Pte.Ltd Singapore Europe Headquarters Cisco Systems International BV Amsterdam, The Netherlands Cisco has more than 2 offices worldwide. Addresses, phone numbers, and fax numbers are listed on the Cisco Website at www.cisco.com/go/offices. CCDE, CCENT, CCSI, Cisco Eos, Cisco Explorer, Cisco HealthPresence, Cisco IronPort, the Cisco logo, Cisco Nurse Connect, Cisco Pulse, Cisco SensorBase, Cisco StackPower, Cisco StadiumVision, Cisco TelePresence, Cisco TrustSec, Cisco Unified Computing System, Cisco WebEx, DCE, Flip Channels, Flip for Good, Flip Mino, Flipshare (Design), Flip Ultra, Flip Video, Flip Video (Design), Instant Broadband, and Welcome to the Human Network are trademarks; Changing the Way We Work, Live, Play, and Learn, Cisco Capital, Cisco Capital (Design), Cisco:Financed (Stylized), Cisco Store, Flip Gift Card, and One Million Acts of Green are service marks; and Access Resgistrar, Aironet, AllTouch, AsyncOS, Bringing the Meeting To You, Catalyst, CCDA, CCDP, CCIE, CCIP, CCNA, CCNP, CCSP, CCVP, Cisco, the Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert logo, Cisco IOS, Cisco Lumin, Cisco Nexus, Cisco Press, Cisco Systems, Cisco Systems Captial, the Cisco Systems logo, Cisco Unity, Collaboration Without Limitation, Continuum, EtherFast, EtherSwitch, Event Center, Explorer, Follow Me Browsing, GainMaker, ilynx, IOS, iphone, IronPort, the IronPort logo, Laser Link, LightSream, Linksys, MeetingPlace, MeetingPlace Chime Sound, MGX, Networkers, Networking Academy, PCNow, PIX, PowerKEY, PowerPanels, PowerTV, PowerTV (Design), PowerVu, Prisma, ProConnect, ROSA, SenderBase, SMARTnet, Spectrum Expert, StackWise, WebEx, and the WebEx logo are registered trademarks of Cisco and/or its affiliates in the United States and certain other countries. All other trademarks mentioned in this document or website are the property of their respective owners. The use of the word partner does not imply a partnership relationship between Cisco and any other company. (12R) Printed in USA C36-XXXXXX- 4/1 Page 9 of 9