Presentation Outline. Soil Sampling. Automation and Precision. Soil Test

Similar documents
Fertility Guidelines for Hops in the Northeast Dr. Heather Darby, University of Vermont Extension Agronomist

Agronomic and Economic Considerations on Michigan Farms

College of Agricultural Sciences Agricultural Research and Cooperative Extension

Fertilizer Grade and Calculations. John Peters UW Soil Science Department

WHAT IS IN FERTILIZER OTHER THAN NUTRIENTS?

ennessee is one of the top livestock producing states in the country. Much of the livestock in Tennessee is raised by smaller-scale, parttime

Calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) are secondary nutrients, but they are

Understanding the. Soil Test Report. Client and Sample Identification

MAINE SOIL TESTING SERVICE

FERTILIZER GUIDELINES FOR AGRONOMIC CROPS IN MINNESOTA

N-P-K FERTILIZERS. by M.L. Vitosh Extension Specialist, Crop and Soil Sciences

Agro-One Soil Analysis

Salinity Management and Soil Amendments for Southwestern Pecan Orchards

Determining Amounts of Fertilizer for Small Areas

Nutrient and Fertilizer Value of Dairy Manure

Estimated Costs of Crop. Production in Iowa File A1-20 The estimated costs of corn, corn silage, Ag Decision Maker

Fertilizer. Recommendations Guide. EC750 September Cooperative Extension Service South Dakota State University U.S. Department of Agriculture

Soil ph. Table 4.1. Desirable Soil ph for Optimum Crop Production ph Range

Maintaining a Healthy Lawn

ph is an expression of the concentration of hydrogen ions in solution

SOIL TEST INTERPRETATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS HANDBOOK

Three Reasons to Broaden Your Fertigation Knowledge

IV. PLANT NUTRIENT ELEMENTS

Managing of Annual Winter Forages in Southwest Texas

SOIL TEST LEVELS AND NUTRIENT BUDGETS IN THE WESTERN U.S.

CALCIUM AND MAGNESIUM: THE SECONDARY COUSINS George Rehm, University of Minnesota

Introduction. Introduction Nutritional Requirements. Six Major Classes of Nutrients. Water 12/1/2011. Regional Hay School -- Bolivar, MO 1

A SOIL TESTING SERVICE FOR FARMERS IN THAILAND, USING MOBILE LABORATORIES

Forage Economics, page2. Production Costs

Sulfur deficiency in corn Jim Camberato, Stephen Maloney, and Shaun Casteel 1 Agronomy Department, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN

Estimating Cash Rental Rates for Farmland

Understanding ph management and plant nutrition Part 5: Choosing the best fertilizer

Best practice guidelines for using poultry litter on pastures

Fertilizing hops improves yield and quality by

Annual Winter Pastures for East Texas

How To Manage Alfalfa

Managing Soil ph and Crop Nutrients

Western Region If you can read this tghen Alzheimer's is a long long, way down the road before it ever gets anywhere near you.

The estimated costs of corn, corn silage,

Optimum soil test levels

Advanced Soil Organic Matter Management

TRENDS IN BULK BLENDING WORLD WIDE

Plants need an adequate level of nutrients

PUTTING FORAGES TOGETHER FOR YEAR ROUND GRAZING

Worksheet for Calculating Biosolids Application Rates in Agriculture

Using Bermudagrass Forage Systems to Mine Phosphorus from High Soil-Test Phosphorus Soils

Nutrient Management for Commercial Fruit & Vegetable Crops in Minnesota

Management Strategies for Rangeland and Introduced Pastures

MATH 110 Landscape Horticulture Worksheet #5

POTASSIUM. Functions of Potassium in Plants. Potassium Deficiency Symptoms

FARMING FOR THE FUTURE How mineral fertilizers can feed the world and maintain its resources in an Integrated Farming System

Sulfur Fertilization of Corn. Jeff Vetsch Univ. of Minnesota Southern Research and Outreach Center December 2013

Oklahoma Forage and Pasture Fertility Guide

Economic and environmental analysis of the introduction of legumes in livestock farming systems

Using Enterprise Budgets To Make Decisions about Your Farm Richar d Carkner

Temperature N Source and Rate CEC (less when high) Application method + H +

SOIL HEALTH COVER CROPS RELAY CROPPING

NITROGEN MANAGEMENT IMPACTS ON WHEAT YIELD AND PROTEIN. Steve Orloff, Steve Wright and Mike Ottman 1 ABSTRACT

These calculations are on a hectare basis or for a given size of an experimental plot.

Pasture, Rangeland, and Forage Insurance: A Risk Management Tool for Hay and Livestock Producers

Soil testing is an excellent measure of soil fertility.

Grass Legume Mixtures:

Payback News. Beef Cows-The Cheapest Mineral Isn t

SOIL FERTILITY MANAGEMENT BASICS. Organic Soil Amendments and Fertilizers

Recycling Nitrogen and Sulfur

ENERGY IN FERTILIZER AND PESTICIDE PRODUCTION AND USE

Substrate ph: Getting it Right for Your Greenhouse Crops

How To Feed Cows In The Winter

GROUNDWATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT CONTROLS

LAB 5 - PLANT NUTRITION. Chemical Ionic forms Approximate dry Element symbol Atomic weight Absorbed by plants tissue concentration

Effects of some synthetic fertilizers on the soil ecosystem By: Heide Hermary, March 2007

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. W. David Smith Extension Crop Science Specialist Tobacco

Managing Bermudagrass Pasture to Reduce Winter Hay Feeding in Beef Cattle Operations

NITROGEN MANAGEMENT WITH DRIP AND SPRINKLER IRRIGATION

TIMOTHY HAY PRODUCTION FOR EXPORT. Steve Fransen 1 ABSTRACT PRODUCTION OF EXPORT QUALITY TIMOTHY HAY IN A GOOD WATER YEAR

Determining nutrient needs

Guidelines for Estimating Wheat Straw Biomass Production Costs. Average Crop Residue Zone in Manitoba

Testing Water for Gardening and Lawn Irrigation

USING HUMIC COMPOUNDS TO IMPROVE EFFICIENCY OF FERTILISER NITROGEN

Simplifying Soil Test Interpretations for Turf Professionals

Penn State University Equine Environmental Stewardship Program

Forage Bermudagrass: Selection, Establishment and Management. Introduction

SOIL FERTILITY AND PLANT NUTRITION PSSC 453, Fall 2008

Why talk about ph? If plants did not care about soil ph, we would not either. (See 12 th ed., Fig. 9.19; 13 th, 14 th, 15 th ed. 9.

NUTRIENT SPECIFICATIONS OF TURKEY WASTE MATERIAL

FERTIGATION. Lawrence J. Schwankl

DETERMINING YOUR STOCKING RATE

NITROGEN IN SOIL AND FERTILIZERS James J. Camberato

How Do I Select Quality Hay?

Evaluation of Combination Phosphorus Sulfur Fertilizer Products for Corn Production

Poultry Manure Production and Nutrient Content

Investigating What's In Soil

Golf Course Environmental Profile

Livestock Budget Estimates for Kentucky

Irrigation Water for Greenhouses and Nurseries

Module 10. Author(s): Mr. Godfrey Nurse (Florida A&M University) and Mr. Fidelis Okpebhola (Virginia State University)

Put Poultry Litter Problems to Bed

Design of Control System for Measurement of Ph and EC of Fertilizer Solution

Soils should be warm and moist for at least a week before SME sampling. Chilean may not be allowed at all after 2012

ALFALFA FOR BEEF COWS

Transcription:

Using Fertilizer and Soil Amendments by Prescription Improves Farming Practices Management Units Use field characteristics (soil type, size, history) websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov Shelby Filley Regional Livestock & Forage Specialist Presentation Outline Soil Sampling Soil Testing and Reports Fertilizer Guidelines Plant nutrients (N-P-K-S ) and Fertilizer materials and lime Least-cost application Tracking nutrients and yield Collect 15 20 subsamples randomly about the management unit. Combine into one composite sample to submit to certified lab. Soil Test Automation and Precision Accurate determination of soil status Efficient Fertilizer Program Economics Environment Optimizes forage growth Assess property value Cost of Improvements 2 million lb of soil in the top 6" of an acre 1

Sampling Depth Plow depth Soil Test Report: Other items Root zone 6" grass-clover 12" alfalfa Nitrogen (N) and Sulfur (S) Very mobile in soil & soil test results not used for fertilizer recommendations Pastures/hay ground OSU fertilizer guide (FG 63) 40-60 lb/ac N (1 3 times per year) 20 30 lb/ac S in the spring Variable-depth sampling Nitrogen application refined EM 9014 - Evaluating Soil Nutrients and by Depth http://extension.oregonstate.edu/catalog/ https://catalog.extension.oregonstate.edu/ PNW614 Soil Test Report: Main items Sample Phosphorus P-ppm Potassium K-ppm Magnesium Mg-ppm Calcium Ca-ppm Buffer* Soil Weak Bray Olsen Index 1 15 33 252 614 1867 5.5 5.7 2 12 31 298 780 2520 5.5 5.7 3 9 38 319 791 2651 5.6 5.7 Soil Test Report: Other items Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC) Indicates potential to hold plant nutrients Capacity of soil to exchange cations (Ca, Mg, K, Na, H, Al) Highest in clay soils and high organic matter soils Base saturation Percentage of exchange sites occupied by basic cations (Ca, Mg, K, Na) If 100%, there is no exchangeable acidity (acidic cations H and Al). Neither used in OSU fertilizer recommendations Not very precise Lack evidence for agronomic response 2

Cation exchange in action Fertilizer and Lime Materials (FG 52) https://catalog.extension.oregonstate.edu Compare Soil Test with Crop Needs Use OSU Fertilizer Guides (FG) and Pacific Northwest (PNW) bulletins http://extension.oregonstate.edu/catalog/ Alfalfa (FG 18, FG 60, PNW 611) Grass & Legume Pastures and Hayground (FG 22, FG 63) Soil Test Interpretation Guide (EC 1478) Other crop fertilizer guides available FG 52 - Fertilizer and Lime Materials FG 76 - Irrigation Water Quality EM 8852- Early Spring Forage Production for W. OR Pastures PNW 614 - Pasture and Grazing Management in the Northwest Fertilizer Materials All values are on a percentage basis (%) Nitrogen N Phosphorus P 2 O 5 Potassium K 2 O N-P-K-S Sulfur S Name 16 16 16 6 Triple-16 46 0 0 0 Urea 21 0 0 24 Ammonium Sulfate (AMS) 11 52 0 0 Mono-Ammonium- Phosphate (MAP) 0 0 60 0 Potash 16 20 0 14 Ammonium-Phosphate- Sulfate Soil Test Report: Main items Sample Phosphorus P-ppm Potassium K-ppm Magnesium Mg-ppm Calcium Ca-ppm Buffer* Soil Weak Bray Olsen Index 1 15 33 252 614 1867 5.5 5.7 2 12 31 298 780 2520 5.5 5.7 3 9 38 319 791 2651 5.6 5.7 Quantities of Nutrients from selected fertilizer applications Example percentage in fertilizer X Amount product applied = pounds nutrient applied Fertilizer lb/a applied N P K S 16-16-16-6 Triple-16 200 32 32 32 12 46-0-0-0 Urea 130 60 0 0 0 21-0-0-24 AMS 200 42 0 0 48 FG 63 is okay, Ca and Mg are good P is low, add 60 100 lb P 2 O 5 /ac K is good (>200) 0.16 X 200 = 32 11-52-0-0 MAP 200 22 104 0 0 0-0-60-0 Potash 200 0 0 120 0 3

Crop-specific Raising with lime 5.5 6.5 for grass and clover Sub-clover and tall fescue relatively acid tolerant White clover and orchard grass less tolerant > 6.5 for alfalfa Ag Lime CaCO 3 Dolomite CaMgCO 3 Not all Ca products are good liming agents Gypsum or CaSO 4 does not change Rock dust? Nutrient availability vs. Soil Amendments Ag composts Wood ash Analyze as composts or ash (tell lab) Some increase (lower acidity in soil) Lime Application Rates (100-score lime) Lime score (rating) If SMP Buffer test for lime is : Apply this amount of lime (t/a): Under 5.5 4 5 5.5 5.8 3 4 5.8 6.1 2 3 6.1 6.5 1 2 Over 6.5 0-1 Calcium Carbonate Equivalents (cce) pure CaCO3 = 100 Fineness Factor (ff) Moisture factor (mf) Lime score =cce x ff x mf Price sources and adjust tonnage applied based on lime score 4

Cost Benefit Analysis $35 cost to test soil (mailing & Lab fee) of a 10 acre field Cost $120/T lime Guess 2 T/acre Soil test calls for 1 T/acre Difference is 1 T/acre X 10 acre X $120/T = $1200 savings in materials Calculating Lime Savings Example need of 60 lb N and 20 lb S per acre AMS = 21-0-0-24 60 lb N/.21 = 286 lb AMS 286 lb AMS x.24 = 69 lb S 286 lb AMS/100 X 110 acidity index = 315 lb lime to neutralize acidity Cost 286 lb AMS x $482/T = 286 lb x $482/2000 lb = $68.93 315 lb lime x $120/T = 315 lb x $120/2000 lb = $18.90 Total cost of $87.83 per acre in materials Application cost for 601 lb material Environmental cost of leached sulfur Cost Benefit Analysis (continued) Or add too little and suffer production loss If forage loss is 1 Ton/acre 1 T/ac x 10 acre = 10 T loss Hay $200/T x 10 T = $2,000 loss Lime not applied $120/T x 10 T = $1200 not spent Difference $2000 loss + $1200 not spent = $800 net loss Calculating Lime Savings Example need of 60 lb N and 20 lb S per acre Ureasul (½ AMS + ½ Urea; 33-0-0-12) 60 lb N/.33 N = 182 lb Ureasul 182 lb Ureasul x.12 S = 22 lb S 182 lb Ureasul/100 x 91 acidity index = 166 lb lime to neutralize acidity Cost 182 lb Ureasul x $600/T = 182 lb x $600/2000 lb = $54.60 166 lb lime x $120/T = 166 lb x $120/2000 lb = $9.96 Total cost of $64.56 per acre in materials Application costs of 342 lb of materials Acidifying Potential for Fertilizers Fertilizer Grade *Acidity Ammonium Sulfate 21-0-0-24 110 Urea 46-0-0 71 Ammonium Phosphate-sulfate 16-20-0-13/15 88 *Pounds of 100 score lime needed to neutralize the acidity produced by fertilizer application of 100 lb/ac Cost Comparison AMS vs. Ureasul Item AMS Ureasul Difference Materials cost ($/ac) $87.83 $64.56 $23.27 Materials applied (lb) 601 lb 348 lb 253 lb Environmental cost (lb S) 49 lb 0 lb 49 lb Time (hrs.) X hr. Y hr. $Z 5

Fertilizer Application to Pastures & Hay Ground FG 63 Forage Dry Matter, lb/a Seasonal Dry Matter Production RESULTS Early N application provides early-season forage 3000 2500 2000 1500 4/2 N 1000 2/5 N 500 0 25-Jan 15-Mar 4-May 23-Jun 12-Aug Date Traditional Control (0) Early N EM 8852, https://catalog.extension.oregonstate.edu Early Spring Forage Production for Western Oregon Pastures EC 1478-E Soil Test Interpretation Guide Hay Removal Costs Nutrients Each ton of typical forage hay removes about 12 to 15 pounds of phosphate (P2O5) 50 to 60 pounds of potash (K2O) Also, need to provide about 30 to 50 pounds of nitrogen per acre on grassy stands (i.e. low legume component) Kopecky, et. al (2008) Fertilizer Application Fall Lime - sampling year Ag lime (CaCO 3 ) Dolomitic lime (+Mg) Other nutrients (yearly) Phosphorus (P) Potassium (K) Some Nitrogen (N) Spring Nitrogen Split applications (early & late) Sulfur Boron sampling year Between hay cuttings Nitrogen (urea) Other Sources of Nitrogen N2 fixation by legumes Amounts (20 300 lb N/ac) Available to grasses as legumes die N from urine and feces Amounts vary w/ source Distribution varies w/ stock 6

Fertilizer and Money Agronomic response to inputs Improved production Spread over the cost of other inputs Time Equipment Fuel Use enterprise budget sheets to track forage production costs Animal Unit Month (AUM) = Forage Animal Unit (AU) 1000-pound cow +/- calf Animal Unit Month (AUM) = lb of forage required for one animal unit for one month 1000 lb cow eats ~ 2.5% body wt in feed/day 1000 lb x 0.025 = 25 lb daily feed intake 25 lb/day x 30 days/month = 750 lb/mo Forage Yield Summary Measure yield (tons of hay and animal unit months carried) Compare your yield (t/ac) with comparable production situations soils interpretation sheets for potential websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov Track yield over time with fertilizing according to soil test. Soil test and fertilize according to test Use fertilizer knowledge for least cost Know your potential yield Grow lots of high-quality plants! Hay Yield = No. bales x bale wt. / ac = 800 bales x 60 lb/bale / 10 acres = 4,800 lb/ac = 2.4 t/a 7