1. Introduction. 2. Definition of Terms

From this document you will learn the answers to the following questions:

Who uses the linkage system?

Similar documents
Technical Requirements to Facilitate ASPEC Work Sharing and ASEAN IP Portal

Experiences with the Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) at the USPTO

2010 WIPO General Assembly

"Patent Office insights on Trilateral process.. Past Successes and future challenges"

Patent Backlogs and Mutual Recognition An economic study by London Economics

SCIT/8/6 ANNEX REPORT ON THE SCIT IT SYSTEMS TASK FORCE. Overview of Task Force Activities March through October 2003

CAS Chemistry Research Report Delivering the latest trends in global chemistry research

The newly concluded Arrangement between the USPTO and IP Australia

European Patent Office / State Intellectual Property Office of the People s Republic of China

Exclusive Distributorship Agreement

Training course report

The Patent Prosecution Highway at the USPTO. Charles Eloshway Senior Patent Counsel Office of Policy and External Affairs USPTO

Non-Patent Document Database for. Examination of Software-Related Inventions

Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) User Seminar

Quality Management Manual for Patent Examination. (Quality Manual)

In force as of 15 March 2005 based on decision by the President of NIB ARBITRATION REGULATIONS

The Japan Patent Office Cooperation for Developing Countries. Deputy Director, Information System Division Japan Patent Office

Striving for IP Excellence Korea s National Strategy for Intellectual Property FRAMEWORK ACT ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

1.2 A list of the GPPH participating offices can be found in Annex I.

Recent Developments in Information Technology (IT) and the Effective Use of Global IP Protection Systems

DECREE THE GOVERNMENT

Intellectual Property Organisation of Pakistan (IPO-Pakistan)

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)

WIPO Regional Training Workshop on IP Data Validation, Verification and Exchange

Toward Enhancement of Examination Quality Management (FY2014)

Evaluation of the Peer to Patent Pilot Program

The Role of Intellectual Property Offices (IPOs) in Promoting Innovation, Business Competitiveness and Economic Growth

Procedures to File a Request to the DPMA for Participation in the Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Programme between the DPMA and SIPO

USPTO Fees - FY 2003

IP5 MMT Project. June Korean Intellectual Property Office

MODEL CONTRACT FOR PROVISION OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES. This Contract is entered into on / /, corresponding to / /1430H by and between:

MEDIATION RULES OF THE COURT OF ARBITRATION AT THE POLISH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

Rules for IB World schools: Diploma Programme

PCT PRACTICE International Applications Filed Prior to January 1, 2004

C Receiving Offices C IB

Agreement. between the Indian Patent Office and the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization

International cooperation

Japanese Opposition System

Agreement. (as in force from July 1, 2014)*

Performance Bond. Business):

WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION ORGANISATION MONDIALE DE LA PROPRIÉTÉ INTELLECTUELLE GENEVA/GENÈVE

FRAMEWORK CONTRACT ON USING AND PROVIDING DAILY PEAK PLUS NATURAL GAS WITHDRAWAL SERVICE

The Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) Program

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS for Registration of National Internet Domain Names

EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE (EPO)

ANNEX II. General Overview of the Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and Their International Registration.

DEFINITIONS. "this web site" means "user" means any person accessing any part of this web site DISCLAIMER

RESTRICTED IP/C/W/15 20 November 1995

Request for Enforcement

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL AND THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA FOR THE PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS

Patent Attorney Ethics

Mexico No. 1 (2015) Agreement

International Trademark Registration with Madrid

IPO BUSINESS SOLUTIONS. Ramsay Shonge, Automation Expert IPO Business Solutions Division

The Web site is owned by the State of Minnesota, Department of Employment and Economic Development, hereinafter MinnesotaWorks.net.

Public Invitation of Ideas for Developing a Global Tourism Hub in Yumeshima

Global Dossier Active Components JPO s Prospects on Active Component. 2 nd GDTF Meeting January 2015 JAPAN PATENT OFFICE

Specific Terms and Conditions of LINE Services for Business Partners: LINE Business Connect

Table 1: General overview of the PCT procedure Legend:

OVH PUBLIC CLOUD INSTANCE SPECIAL CONDITIONS

Special Union for the International Deposit of Industrial Designs (Hague Union)

Service Description Fast-Track Dispatch

IMO General Terms and Conditions

Joint Doctoral Degree

ISO 9001: 2008 Boosting quality to differentiate yourself from the competition. xxxx November 2008

A guide to applying for your trade mark overseas

FREE SOFTWARE LICENSING AGREEMENT CeCILL

Taking into consideration the importance of enhancing cooperation through the execution of multilateral activities among the Parties;

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA ACTING THROUGH THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND IMAGINE RURAL DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE

University Industry Collaboration to Promote Technology Transfer

CANADIAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE

The Government of Republic of India and the Government of The Republic of Cyprus (hereinafter referred to as the Contracting Parties );

RELYING PARTY AGREEMENT AND LIMITED WARRANTY

How To Use The Revenue Accounting And Management System (Ram) System

Consultant s Services Small Assignments, Lump-Sum Payments

BANK LINK USE AGREEMENT NO. Representative:

Rules for IB World Schools: Diploma Programme. Rules for IB World Schools: Diploma Programme

The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Government of the. hereinafter referred to as the "Contracting Parties",

Annex B. The Proposed Amendments AMENDMENTS TO NATIONAL INSTRUMENT MARKETPLACE OPERATION

SCC ARBITRATION RULES OF THE ARBITRATION INSTITUTE OF THE STOCKHOLM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

WIPO Summer Schools on Intellectual Property

Cloud Hosting Terms and Conditions

WI-FI ALLIANCE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS POLICY

AGREEMENT ON ACCESSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA TO THE CENTRAL EUROPEAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT

THE CENTRAL BANK OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA BOARD RESOLUTION No. 296

COLLABORATION AGREEMENT

How To Pay A Customer In European Currency (European)

Decree No. 18/2009 (VIII. 6.) MNB of the Governor of the National Bank of Hungary. on Payment Services Activities CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS.

Maine Cernota & Rardin, Registered Patent Attorneys 547 Amherst St., 3 rd Floor, Nashua, NH info@mcr-ip.com

PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT)

Annex 1. Contract Checklist for Cloud-Based Genomic Research Version 1.0, 21 July 2015

Intellectual Property Rights in E-Learning Materials

Functions of the International Bureau

Observations from the NAS Committee Study on IP Management in SSOs. Keith Maskus Toulouse Conference May 16, 2013

ON THE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION. The Commission des opérations de bourse of France and the Finanaal SupertJisory Commission of Republic of Korea;

Value Extended Warranty and Premium Extended Warranty. Terms and Conditions

Commercial agency agreements are controlled by Royal Decrees, Ministry of Commerce Resolutions and Council of Ministers Resolutions.

IP AUSTRALIA B2B ONLINE TRANSACTION SYSTEM AGREEMENT

FEASIBILITY STUDY ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL PATENT REGISTER DATABASES AND LINKAGE TO PATENTSCOPE

Patent Public Advisory Committee Quarterly Meeting. IT Update. John Owens II. Chief Information Officer. Debbie Stephens

Transcription:

[Final Draft ver.2] Guideline on Use of the Dossier Access System Linked with One Portal Dossier and WIPO-CASE as a Pilot Case (Formulated on April 1, 2014) 1. Introduction This guideline describes the matters which One Portal Dossier (OPD) participating Offices and WIPO-CASE participating Offices mutually consent to when their dossier information is exchanged using the dossier access system linking One Portal Dossier and WIPO-CASE (hereinafter referred to as the linkage system"). This guideline will be in effect during a pilot project which will last 12 months from April 1, 2014. At the end of the pilot, the linkage system and the governance framework will be reviewed. The exchange of dossier information between OPD participating Offices or between WIPO-CASE participating Offices within each system will be excluded from the scope of this Guideline. Therefore, when an OPD participating Office uses OPD, it will comply with the arrangements which were formulated by OPD participating Offices (OPD Governance Policy, etc.) and when a WIPO-CASE participating Office uses WIPO-CASE, it will comply with the arrangements which were formulated by WIPO-CASE participating Offices (WIPO-CASE Framework Provision). 2. Definition of Terms 2.1 OPD and WIPO-CASE OPD indicates the dossier access system developed by the European Patent Office (EPO), the Japan Patent Office (JPO), the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO), the State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China (SIPO), and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). WIPO-CASE indicates the dossier access system developed by the International Bureau of WIPO (IB of WIPO). 2.2 OPD participating Office and WIPO-CASE participating Office OPD participating Office indicates the EPO, the JPO, KIPO, SIPO and the USPTO, which exchange dossier information via OPD. WIPO-CASE participating Office indicates IP Australia (IPA), the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO), the United Kingdom Intellectual Property 1

Office (UKIPO), and other Intellectual Property Offices (IPOs), which exchange dossier information via WIPO-CASE. Unless otherwise noted, the IB of WIPO is included in the WIPO-CASE participating Offices. 2.3 Dossier Information Dossier information indicates documents submitted by applicants such as descriptions, amendments and written opinions of an application; documents dispatched by the Office such as office actions, including notification of reasons for refusal and decisions to grant a patent; documents submitted by third parties such as third party observations; and cited document information which is discovered as a result of a search and cited in an office action. 2.4 Accessing Office Accessing Office indicates the OPD participating Office or WIPO-CASE participating Office which uses the linkage system, retrieves dossier information from other Offices via the linkage system, and allows its end-users to refer to it. 2.5 Providing Office Providing Office indicates the OPD participating Office or WIPO-CASE participating Office which uses the linkage system and allows its own dossier information to be made available to an Accessing Office via the linkage system in response to the request from the Accessing Office. This includes providing Offices who indirectly provide their dossier information through another Office or organization (e.g. IB of WIPO). 3. Principles of the Use of the Linkage System 3.1 Principle of Reciprocity All participating offices consent to become Providing Offices when they are legally, operationally and technically capable. 3.2 Scope of Use The use of dossier information provided by Providing Offices via the linkage system is limited to examiners and officials of Accessing Offices. When exchanging dossier information via the linkage system, the identity of the actual Accessing Office will be made known to the Providing Office at the 2

time of the request. Information retrieved from a Providing Office that is stored by the Accessing Office is subject to the same scope of use as described above, i.e., its use is limited to examiners and officials of the Accessing Office. (See Section 3.4, Secondary Use of Dossier Information). 3.3 Scope of Data Provision of Dossier Information Following the confirmation of the linkage between a Providing Office and an Accessing Office, each Providing Office will allow the equivalent dossier information to be made available to the Accessing Office without applying different treatment to each Accessing Office. However, this does not apply where it is difficult to provide equivalent information, arising from technical differences between OPD and WIPO-CASE. Dossier information which the Providing Office provides will be limited to that concerned with applications already published and which can be provided by the Providing Office to all Accessing Offices. 3.4 Secondary Use of Dossier Information Accessing Offices will not allow anyone other than the examiners and the officials of the Office concerned to use all or part of the dossier information retrieved from the Providing Office. OPD participating offices will not provide to WIPO-CASE participating offices, via the linkage system, dossier information retrieved via OPD from another OPD participating office. 3.5 Independence of Use of Each System If the terms of use of one system (OPD or WIPO-CASE) are changed, those changes will only apply to the participating offices and the documents exchanged within that system. Any changes to the terms of use of documents exchanged according to this Guideline may only be made by a revision of this Guideline according to Section 5 (Revision of the Guideline). 3.6 Translation Each Providing Office will make efforts to translate into English (including machine translation) dossier information written in a language other than English and to provide the translation to the Accessing Offices, in addition to the data in 3

the original language. 3.7 Abusive Use Access to dossier information at the other Offices via the linkage system will be restricted to real time access by request. Namely, excessive or abusive batch access or access similar thereto will be prohibited. This is intended to prevent incidents, such as access delay by users from the other Offices and system failure, due to excessive communication load by such access. 4. Installation and Operation of the Linkage System The linkage system will be configured by using OPD and WIPO-CASE and making a linkage of both. The aim is to build the linkage at low cost. 4.1 Development and Maintenance of the Linkage System Offices will use the linkage system according to the accepted technical specifications of the linkage system. The IB of WIPO will develop and maintain the Gateway which functions as a hub to interconnect OPD and WIPO-CASE in the linkage system. The linkage system will adopt the security measures (encryption, access control, etc.) which are equivalent to those described in the OPD technical specification. The Providing Office services will be promptly offered as soon as the linkage system is made available. 4.2 Cost Allocation for the Installation of the Linkage System Expenses required for the installation and maintenance of the linkage system at each Office will be paid by that Office. Where expenses required for the installation and maintenance of the common equipment arises, they will be determined based on deliberations between the Offices using the linkage system. 5. Revision of the Guideline The present guideline may be revised with the consent of all of the Offices which use the linkage system in accordance with this guideline. 6. Procedures for the Offices to Newly Participate in the Linkage 4

System (1) Application process for use of the linkage system An OPD participating Office or a WIPO-CASE participating Office (hereinafter referred to as a "newly participating Office"), which wishes to use the linkage system according to this Guideline, after it is formulated, will notify the JPO or the IB of WIPO of its intention to become a participant in the linkage system, as well as the timing of when it expects to become a Providing Office (with reference to section 3.1). Information about the newly participating office s status will be available on the WIPO and JPO websites, in a format such as illustrated in the Annex. (2) Confirmation by Providing Offices A newly participating Office must be explicitly validated by the relevant Providing Office before the newly participating Office may access the dossier information of the Providing Office via the linkage system. The confirmations will be coordinated by the JPO (for OPD offices) and the IB of WIPO (for WIPO-CASE offices). (2-1) A newly participating Office as an OPD participating Office A newly participating Office will confirm each WIPO-CASE Providing Office s intention, which already uses the linkage system under the coordination of the JPO, of sharing dossier information with the said newly participating Office (2-2) A newly participating Office as a WIPO-CASE participating Office A newly participating Office will confirm each OPD Providing Office s intention, which already uses the linkage system under the coordination of IB of WIPO, of sharing dossier information with the said newly participating Office. (2-3) Recording and sharing of information Information about the participating Offices and the confirmed linkages between Providing Offices and Accessing Offices will be recorded by the IB of WIPO and JPO and published on the WIPO and JPO websites, in a format such as illustrated in the Annex. Offices will share with each other information necessary for smooth operation of the linkage system, such as service available hours, contact points and incident handling for the linkage system. (3) Preparation for starting to use the linkage system When the said Offices mutually consent to share dossier information between 5

them, the IB of WIPO will take the necessary technical measures to set the Gateway so that use of the linkage system will be made possible, promptly. 7. Other Procedure The Providing Office may deny access to dossier information for any reason deemed to be acceptable by the Providing Office, e.g., abuse (deliberate or inadvertent) by an accessing system, failure of an Accessing Office to comply with Principle of Reciprocity as listed in Section 3.1, etc. Consultation between the two Offices concerned should follow to address the denial of access. 8. Settlement of Disputes Any dispute between Offices arising out of or relating to the use of the linkage system will be settled amicably through negotiations between the participants concerned. 6

(Annex) (1) The following Offices will use the linkage system as a Providing Office after a specified timing indicated below. - CIPO :after mm, YYYY - IPA :after mm, YYYY - JPO :after mm, YYYY - UKIPO :after mm, YYYY (2) A list of the Offices which use the linkage system according to this Guideline. OPD participating Offices JPO CIPO mm, YYYY WIPO- IPA mm, YYYY CASE UKIPO mm, YYYY participating Offices [Note: Each cell should be filled out with month and year to start the dossier information sharing which has been agreed between two Offices.] 7