SF2.2: Ideal and actual number of children

Similar documents
SF3.1: Marriage and divorce rates

CO1.2: Life expectancy at birth

LMF1.2: Maternal employment rates

PF1.5: Child Support

Delegation in human resource management

PF2.3: Additional leave entitlements for working parents

Ageing OECD Societies

Among the 34 OECD countries, Belgium performed above the OECD average in each of

Student performance in mathematics, reading and science

The Global Flight From Marriage : Has It Come to the Arabic World? A First Look at the Evidence

How To Calculate Tertiary Type A Graduation Rate

How many students study abroad and where do they go?

Size and Development of the Shadow Economy of 31 European and 5 other OECD Countries from 2003 to 2015: Different Developments

PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY WORKERS

EUROPE 2020 TARGET: TERTIARY EDUCATION ATTAINMENT

Encouraging Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC)

A Comparison of the Tax Burden on Labor in the OECD

How To Tax On Pension Income For Older People In European Countries

UNITED STATES. Key findings

TOWARDS PUBLIC PROCUREMENT KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS. Paulo Magina Public Sector Integrity Division

User language preferences online. Analytical report

Short Analytical Web Note 3/2015

Immigrant fertility in West Germany: Socialization effect in transitions to second and third births?

HOW COMPANIES INFLUENCE OUR SOCIETY: CITIZENS VIEW

relating to household s disposable income. A Gini Coefficient of zero indicates

Foreign Taxes Paid and Foreign Source Income INTECH Global Income Managed Volatility Fund

Health at a Glance: Europe 2014

Expenditure and Outputs in the Irish Health System: A Cross Country Comparison

Country note - Greece

Health and welfare Humanities and arts Social sciences, bussiness and law. Ireland. Portugal. Denmark. Spain. New Zealand. Argentina 1.

Marriage Trends in Western Culture: A Fact Sheet

INTERNATIONAL COMPARISONS OF PART-TIME WORK

A Comparison of the Tax Burden on Labor in the OECD By Kyle Pomerleau

41 T Korea, Rep T Netherlands T Japan E Bulgaria T Argentina T Czech Republic T Greece 50.

Immigration Reform, Economic Growth, and the Fiscal Challenge Douglas Holtz- Eakin l April 2013

Country note China. More than 255 million people in OECD and G20 countries have now attained tertiary education (Table A1.3a).

Higher education institutions as places to integrate individual lifelong learning strategies

The U.S Health Care Paradox: How Spending More is Getting Us Less

International Women's Day PwC Women in Work Index

(OECD, 2012) Equity and Quality in Education: Supporting Disadvantaged Students and Schools

What Are the Incentives to Invest in Education?

OECD Family database OECD - Social Policy Division - Directorate of Employment, Labour and Social Affairs

EUROPEAN YOUTH: PARTICIPATION IN DEMOCRATIC LIFE

Student performance in mathematics, reading and science

RETAIL FINANCIAL SERVICES

- 2 - Chart 2. Annual percent change in hourly compensation costs in manufacturing and exchange rates,

RETAIL FINANCIAL SERVICES

WELFARE STATES AND PUBLIC HEALTH: AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON. Peter Abrahamson University of Copenhagen

International investment continues to struggle

International comparisons of obesity prevalence

Judicial performance and its determinants: a cross-country perspective

Trends in Digitally-Enabled Trade in Services. by Maria Borga and Jennifer Koncz-Bruner

work Women looking for Discussions of the disadvantage faced by women

Cross-country comparison of health care system efficiency

PORTABILITY OF SOCIAL SECURITY AND HEALTH CARE BENEFITS IN ITALY

THE LOW INTEREST RATE ENVIRONMENT AND ITS IMPACT ON INSURANCE MARKETS. Mamiko Yokoi-Arai

What Proportion of National Wealth Is Spent on Education?

Insurance corporations and pension funds in OECD countries

Health Care in Crisis

International Labor Comparisons

How Does Educational Attainment Affect Participation in the Labour Market?

Monitoring the social impact of the crisis: public perceptions in the European Union (wave 6) REPORT

Student performance in mathematics, reading and science

Population Aging in Developed Countries: Emerging Trends and Dynamics Wan He, Ph.D. Population Division U.S. Census Bureau

"BLUE SKY II 2006": WHAT INDICATORS FOR SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION POLICIES IN THE 21 ST CENTURY? Ottawa, September 2006

Gender Brief. Prepared by the OECD Social Policy Division

ARE ENTREPRENEURS BORN OR MADE? AMWAY GLOBAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP REPORT ITALY AND UNITED STATES IN COMPARISON

Health Care Systems: Efficiency and Policy Settings

Education at a Glance OECD Technical Note For Spain

Family Law. Analytical Report

Statistical Data on Women Entrepreneurs in Europe

Broadband Mapping 2013

Women s Earnings and Income

Waiting times and other barriers to health care access

Canada GO 2535 TM World Traveller's edition Maps of North America (Canada, US, Mexico), Western and Central Europe (including Russia) CAD 349,95

Taxing Wages 2014 SPECIAL FEATURE: CHANGES IN STRUCTURAL LABOUR INCOME TAX PROGRESSIVITY OVER THE PERIOD IN OECD MEMBER COUNTRIES

ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT

10. European Union. (a) Past trends

Labour Force Survey 2014 Almost 10 million part-time workers in the EU would have preferred to work more Two-thirds were women

What Is the Student-Teacher Ratio and How Big

Current Trends & Analysis of ACBS. Completion of Accredited Courses & Recognition of Prior Learning in ACBS

Indicator C2 How do early childhood education systems differ around the world?

Remarriage in the United States

The Path Forward. International Women s Day 2012 Global Research Results

ANTICIPATING POPULATION AGEING CHALLENGES AND RESPONSES. Peter Whiteford Social Policy Division, OECD

Replacement Migration

Education at a Glance. OECD Indicators. Annex: UOE Data Collection Sources

Belgium (Fr.) Australia. Austria. England. Belgium (Fl.) United States 2. Finland 2. Norway 2. Belgium (Fr.) Australia. Austria Norway 2, 4.

Preventing fraud and corruption in public procurement

What Is the Total Public Spending on Education?

Transcription:

Definitions and methodology SF.: Ideal and actual number of children Childbearing preferences are difficult to measure since they depend on different factors, including social norms, personal circumstances, and evolve with age and the number of children already born to parents. To get a better view of these different factors, some surveys aim to distinguish between personal views on the desired number of children, a more general view on the ideal family size, but also ask parents on the desired number of additional children. Surveys obtain information on the more general view on the desired number of children in families in society by asking respondents Generally speaking, what do you think is the ideal number of children for a family? However, the main indicator underlying the key findings in this indicator is the mean personal ideal number of children which reflects the number of children that people consider as ideal for themselves personally as averaged across respondents (Chart SF.A). For European countries in the Eurobarometer survey, this information is based on survey responses to the question: And for you personally, what would be the ideal number of children you would like to have or would have liked to have? This information is provided for men and women of different age groups: 5-4, 5-9 and 4-54 years. Similar information is available for most non-european OECD countries from the World Value Survey, although these surveys account for the personal rather than the general view on the ideal number of children, which affects comparability (see comparability and data issues). Intentions to have more children also depend on the number of children already born to parents. In addition to the children already born to parents the remaining number of intended children provides an estimation of the ultimately intended family size (the question asks "what is the total intended number of children"). Information on ideal number of children among women is also presented by various socioeconomic groups based on data available in the World Value Survey for a selected group of OECD countries (see Chart SF..D): by the education level and employment status of women. The education level is divided into low (ISCED -), medium (ISCED ) and high (ISCED A+), while information on the employment status is categporised into women who are in employment (including full-time, part-time and self-employment) and women who are not in employment (including those unemployed and those not seeking employment). Key findings On average in most OECD countries, the mean personal family size for both men and women is around.5 children, slightly above the population replacement rate level of. children per woman. The ideal family size varies widely across OECD countries. At over.7 children, the desired family size is largest in Mexico and New Zealand, and fertility intentions are also high in Australia, France, Japan and Northern European countries (Chart SF..A). By contrast, in Austria, fertility ideals are below replacement levels in all age groups of women. In most other countries, the mean personal ideal number of children is close to children or above among men and women between 5 and 9 years of age, who are the most likely to procreate. More broadly, the differences by sex are not very large, while ideals in family size increase with age for both for men and women. It is not possible, however, to assess if this relates to the effect of age and/or to cohort changes in attitudes. Other relevant indicators: Family size and composition (SF.); Fertility rates (SF.); Mean age of mother at first childbirth (SF.) and Share of births outside marriage (SF.4); and, Childlessness (SF.5). Last updated //4

Chart SF..A: Mean personal ideal number of children, Panel A: Men aged above 5, by age group 4 Total 5-4() 5-9 4-54() OECD =. Panel B: Women aged above 5, by age group 4 Total 5-4() 5-9 4-54() OECD =.8 ) for Australia ) -4 instead of 5-4 for Australia. ) 4-44 for Korea 4) Footnote by Turkey: The information in this document with reference to Cyprus relates to the southern part of the Island. There is no single authority representing both Turkish and Greek Cypriot people on the Island. Turkey recognizes the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). Until a lasting and equitable solution is found within the context of United Nations, Turkey shall preserve its position concerning the Cyprus issue. 5) Footnote by all the European Union Member States of the OECD and the European Commission: The Republic of Cyprus is recognized by all members of the United Nations with the exception of Turkey. The information in this document relates to the area under the effective control of the Government of the Republic of Cyprus. 6) Data for Japan cover married men and women all together. 7) Data for Korea is for women aged 4-44 instead of 4-54. Sources: Australia: Fertility Decision Making Project, Australian Institute of Family Studies; European countries: ; Eurobarometer 76; Japan: Thirteenth Japanese National Fertility Survey; Korea: Korea Institute for Health & Social Affairs; New Zealand: World Value Survey Wave 6; and Mexico: Encuesta Nacional de la Dinámica Demográfica. Last updated //4

Chart SF..B provides more detailed information on the exact number of children that women consider as ideal as a percentage of all women aged 5 to 9, as opposed to the average ideal number of children presented in Chart SF.A Panel B. Remaining childless is here included as an alternative to having, or or more children. Childlessness is the ideal fertility option for only a small minority of adults (4% on average in the OECD), but this proportion is more than twice as high in Austria and Luxembourg (Chart SF..B). Not many women wish to have one child only; about % of respondents on average, but this proportion is higher in South European countries (Portugal, Spain and Italy), Mexico, the Slovak Republic and Austria. No children Chart SF..B: Ideal family size, mid Women aged 5 to 9, percentage Child children or more children. See Note for chart SF..A Source: See chart SF..A Last updated //4

The large majority of adults prefer to have two children: more than 5% of 5 to 9 years old respondents consider children as the appropriate family size in most OECD countries (Chart SF.B). When the proportion is lower (Belgium, Finland, France, Ireland, Mexico and Sweden), this is mainly because 4% of the adults would like to have larger families with children or more. Many women aged 5 to 9 have not yet realised their childbearing intentions (Chart SF..C). When these intentions are considered together with the number of children women in this age-group already have, large cross-country variations appear in the ideal ultimately intended family size of women. The ultimately intended family size is particularly small in Italy, Spain and Austria. Nevertheless, the number of children women intend to have in these countries is above the actual fertility rate, which points to barriers in family formation in all these countries. Chart SF..C: Ultimately intended number of children, Women aged 5 to 9 Actual Intended.5.5.5 Source: Eurobarometer : childbearing preferences and family issues in Europe At the macro-level, the gap between actual and ideal fertility is also illustrated by chart SF..D which puts together total fertility rates and the ideal number of children such as provided by the - wave (wave 6) of the World Value Surveys. Chart SF..D: Ideal and actual fertility rates, - Source: World Value Survey wave 6. 4 Last updated //4

Ideal number of children by socio-economic characteristics Chart SF..E presents the average ideal number of children among women aged 4+ by their level of education. The data shows that women ideally want fewer children if they have a university degree (highly educated) than women with lower levels of education in all countries for which data are available, except in Austria and Poland. While women with low levels of education generally want more children than their peers. The difference in the average ideal number of children between highly and lowly educated women is greatest (difference of more than child) in Canada, France, Ireland, Korea, Mexico, Spain, Turkey and the United States. Chart SF..E: Ideal fertility rates by education level of women, - Average ideal number of children among women aged 4+ Low = ISCED -; Medium = ISCED A and B; High = ISCED A and 4 Source: World Value Survey wave 6. The average ideal number of children that women want, grouped by employment status, is presented in Chart SF.F. The data shows that women who are in employment generally want more children than women who are not employment, except in Sweden. The difference in ideal number of children among women in employment and those who are not is largest (at more than child) in France, Ireland, Mexico and Turkey. Chart SF..F: Ideal fertility rates by employment status, - Average ideal number of children among women aged 4+ In employment includes all persons in regular employment, whether full-time, part-time or self-employment; not in employment includes all unemployed persona and persons not seeking employment Source: World Value Survey wave 6. 5 Last updated //4

Comparability and data issues Different sources are used to obtain information on the ideal number of children. The Eurobarometer was used for 5 European countries where the survey was conducted during the winter of. The main advantage of this survey is the cross-country comparability of data through the use of a common questionnaire in all 5 countries. However, the limited size of survey samples (around, respondents per country) may affect the representativeness with regards to the demographic characteristics and attitudes of the population. The same shortcomings apply to the World Value Surveys that has been used for New Zealand. In contrast to that, estimates for Japan, Korea or Mexico are based on fertility surveys with much bigger sample size (6,8 in Japan and 9, in Mexico for example). In these latter surveys, people are asked about their ideal number of children, with no distinction between general and personal views. Measurement of family size ideals and/or fertility intentions are also very sensitive to how questions are ordered and formulated. The Eurobarometer attempts to disentangle opinions on the number of children that people consider as ideal from a general or collective perspective from what they consider as ideal for themselves. General opinions on family size ideal lead most often to higher estimates than personal ideals (Chart SF..G). Because the distinction between general and personal ideals is not applied in the World Value Survey or in the other fertility surveys, these surveys (Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Korea, Mexico and the United States), therefore are likely to slightly overestimate the personal ideal family size. Chart SF..G The gap between general and personal ideals number of children, 5 years old and over Men Women - Source: Eurobarometer : childbearing preferences and family issues in Europe The ideal number of children among women aged 4+ by socio economic groups are descriptive and are not regressed with control factors, thus the differences may not be directly as a result of the socio-economic groups discussed but can also be due to other factors. While the World Value Survey includes information on many other factors, only the major socio-economic factors are presented where the difference in scores are statistically significant across most countries. Sources and further reading: D Addio A., M. Mira d Ercole M. (5). Fertility trends and the impact of policies. Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, OECD, Paris; Heiland, F., A. Prskawetz, and W. Sanderson (8), Are individuals desired family sizes stable? Evidence from West German panel data, European Journal of Population, 4(), 9 56; Liefbroer A. (9), Changes in Family Size Intentions Across Young Adulthood: A Life-Course Perspective, European 6 Last updated //4

Journal of Population (9), Special issue on 'Fertility Intentions and Outcomes', 5(4): 6-86; Quesnel-Vallée A. and S. Ph. Morgan (), Missing the target? Correspondance of fertility intentions and behavior in the US, Population Research and Policy Review :497-55; Toulemon L. And M.R.Testa (5), Fertility intentions and actual fertility: a complex relationship, Population and Societies, 45; Testa M. R. (6), Childbearing preferences and family issues in Europe, Eurobarometer 76, http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/whatsnew_en.htm ; and, Wilkins R, D. Warren and M. Hahn (9), Families, Incomes and Jobs, Volume 4: A Statistical Report on Waves to 6 of the HILDA Survey, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research. OECD () Doing Better for Families, OECD, Paris www.oecd.org/social/family/doingbetter 7 Last updated //4