A Cradle-to-Gate Life Cycle Analysis of Curtainwall Framing Materials: Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic and Aluminum Mullions

Similar documents
Conclusions and Summary Report Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Highway Guard Rail Posts

GYPSUM ASSOCIATION LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT SUMMARY


Carbon Sequestration Tool Background and User Guide

Final Report. Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Aluminum Beverage Cans. Aluminum Association, Inc. Washington, D.C. PE Americas.

White Paper Life Cycle Assessment and Product Carbon Footprint

A clean energy solution from cradle to grave

The new Audi TT Coupé. Life Cycle Assessment

Environmental Product Declaration

LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT ON COTTON AND VISCOSE FIBRES FOR TEXTILE PRODUCTION

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION

Sustainable Plastics with Reduced Carbon Footprint & Reduced Waste

Printed circuit board [EDP (0)]

Life Cycle Assessment of Reusable and Single-use Plastic Bags in California

NEPD nr.: 221E ver 2.1. The declaration has been prepared by Thale Plesser, SINTEF Building and Infrastructure

Sustainable Manufacturing Seminar. Designing to Sustain the Economy, Environment and Society. Sustainable Product Standards (case-study)

Life Cycle Inventory Packaging Options for Shipping Soft Goods in E-Commerce and Catalog Sales

Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) for Concrete

UBC Social Ecological Economic Development Studies (SEEDS) Student Report. Life Cycle Assessment of UBC Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences Building

Birmingham City University / Students Union Aspects and Impacts Register. Waste. Impacts description

Life Cycle Assessment of Deinked and Virgin Pulp FINAL

Category 5: Waste Generated in Operations

IMPACT OF PLASTICS PACKAGING ON LIFE CYCLE ENERGY CONSUMPTION & GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS IN THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA Substitution Analysis

Life Cycle Assessment and Forest Products: A White Paper

Life Cycle Assessment of Polymers in an Automotive Bolster

Belgard Pavers Interlocking Concrete Paving Units

12.5: Generating Current Electricity pg. 518

Climate Change and Waste The Missing Link December 2010 Written by Jacob Gregory

The new Audi R8. Life Cycle Assessment

How To Do A Complete Life Cycle Analysis Of Packaging

Vinyl and Polymer Products

GaBi EDU. Handbook to Explain LCA Using the GaBi EDU Software Package

ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCT DECLARATION as per ISO and EN 15804

LIFE-CYCLE IMPACTS AND COSTS OF MANGANESE LOSSES AND RECOVERY DURING FERROMANGANESE PRODUCTION

Levi Strauss & Co. San Francisco, CA March 2009

The Greenhouse Gas Protocol

A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Canadian Hardwood Flooring with Alternative Flooring Types. Acknowledgements

Computing the Carbon Footprint Supply Chain for the Semiconductor Industry: A Learning Tool.

Life Cycle Assessment of Three Water Scenarios: Importation, Reclamation, and Desalination

Legrand's environmental commitments

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1

Resource and Environmental Profile Analysis of Polyethylene Milk Bottles and Polyethylene-coated Paperboard Milk Cartons

Product Environmental Profile Step Down Transformers

A Life Cycle Assessment Comparing Select Gas-to-Liquid Fuels with Conventional Fuels in the Transportation Sector

TABLET DETERGENTS Towards A More Sustainable Future

The Nitrogen Cycle. What is Nitrogen? Human Alteration of the Global Nitrogen Cycle. How does the nitrogen cycle work?

Paroc Insulation, product group with density <70 kg/m³ Product

Carbon Dioxide Membrane Separation for Carbon Capture using Direct FuelCell Systems

Life Cycle Assessment of Hand Drying Systems

Life Cycle Assessment of Newsprint Distribution at an Integrated Mill. Erica Salazar, M.Sc.A. (P2004)

ALUMINUM EXTRUSIONS ANODIZED, PAINTED AND MILL-FINISH

Life Cycle Assessment of a Solid Ink MFP Compared with a Color Laser MFP Total Lifetime Energy Investment and Global Warming Impact

An environmental comparison of paper and plastic labels. Chris Edwards & Gary Parker Intertek Expert Services

University of South Florida Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory FY

This fact sheet provides an overview of options for managing solid

Generating Current Electricity: Complete the following summary table for each way that electrical energy is generated. Pros:

Zinkbolt. ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCT DECLARATION in accordance with ISO 14025, ISO and EN Owner of the declaration:

BASF Scope 3 GHG Inventory Report

ENVIRONMENTAL Product Declaration as per ISO and EN Akçansa Çimento Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş. Portland Cement CEM I 42.

Environmental Life Cycle Assessment Framework for Sukker Production (Raw Sugar Production)

Screening Study of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of the Electric Kettle with SimaPro Software***

Title: A Practical Methodology for Biorefinery Product Chain Environmental Analysis Using Life Cycle Assessment

EMBODIED ENERGY ANALYSIS OF ALUMINIUM-CLAD WINDOWS

Legrand's environmental commitments

CARBON ASSESSMENT TICKETING DELIVERY SYSTEMS

Glasopor (Cellular glass aggregate) Product

Review Timber as a Building Material - An environmental comparison against synthetic building materials

EMISSIONS OF AIR POLLUTANTS IN THE UK, 1970 TO 2014

BestPractices. Alcoa Teams with DOE to Reduce Energy Consumption. Corporate Energy Management Case Study. Summary. Benefits

Sustainable Purchasing Guide Promotional Items

General Structure of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Lecture. Mark Huijbregts Department of Environmental science Radboud University

ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF ENERGY SOURCES. Prepared by Sandra Vasa-Sideris, PhD, Southern Polytechnic State University, for use by students

ResearcH JournaL 2010 / VOL

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Cost (LCC) Tool. for Commercial Building Developments in Hong Kong

EcoWorx Carpet Tile with EcoSolution Q Face Fiber COMMERCIAL CARPET TILE AVERAGE FACE WEIGHT OZ/SQUARE YARD

Nordic Ecolabelling. Steps

LIFE CYCLE IMPACTS OF ALKALINE BATTERIES WITH A

COMPARATIVE PRODUCT LIFECYCLE ASSESSMENT NIKE, Inc. Product Comparisons

LCA of biofuels: developments and constraints

Original Research Life Cycle Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste Management Comparison of Results Using Different LCA Models

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Aluminum and Steel Truck Wheels

Protan SE 1.2 Roof Membrane Product

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2012 SCORING GUIDELINES

Scope 1 describes direct greenhouse gas emissions from sources that are owned by or under the direct control of the reporting entity;

Total Lifetime Energy Investment and Global Warming Impact

Solid softwood panelling for interior use Product

Glasopor (Cellular glass aggregate) Product

READING GUIDE FOR THE REPOSITORY ON SHOES BP X Contents. Introduction 2

Life Cycle Assessment of Swiss Chocolate

KS3 Science: Chemistry Contents

GHG Emission Reductions Quantification Report

Determination of the Impact of Waste Management Activities on Greenhouse Gas Emissions: 2005 Update Final Report Contract No.

Harmonization of LCA Methodologies for Metals

Revealing the costs of air pollution from industrial facilities in Europe a summary for policymakers

The BOMBARDIER* REGINA*

How To Understand The Environmental Impacts Of A Plastic Bottle

McDonald s Case Note: Note on Life-Cycle Analysis

SimaPro 7. Tutorial. product ecology consultants

Environmental Product Declaration Vinyl Composition Tile

Colophon. Title: SimaPro Tutorial. Written by: PRé Mark Goedkoop, Michiel Oele, Marisa Vieira, Jorrit Leijting, Tommie Ponsioen, Ellen Meijer

Transcription:

A Cradle-to-Gate Life Cycle Analysis of Curtainwall Framing Materials: Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic and Aluminum Mullions Prepared for: GlasCurtain Consortium by: Athena Sustainable Materials Institute June 26, 2009

Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Scope of Study 2 3.0 Life Cycle Inventory 3 3.1 Manufacturing Process 4 3.2 Treatment of Recycling in Aluminum LCI 5 3.3 Resource Transportation to Manufacturer 6 3.4 Resource Extraction and Commodity Manufacturing LCI Data Sources 6 4.0 Life Cycle Impact Assessment 8 4.1 Methodology 8 5.0 Results 10 6.0 References 13

1.0 Introduction The GlasCurtain Consortium commissioned the Athena Institute to perform an environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) of a prototypical fiberglass reinforced pultrusion (FRP) curtainwall framing system and contrast its performance with that of conventional aluminum curtainwall framing. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a systematic approach to quantifying the environmental impacts associated with a product throughout its entire life from initial extraction of the raw materials through manufacturing, use, and eventual disposal or recycling. A key component within the process of LCA is the life cycle inventory (LCI). An LCI tracks all the mass and energy flows from the environment as well as the emissions to air, water and solids back to the environment. Depending on the goal and scope of the study, these LCI data may be collected first-hand from manufacturing processes (primary data), or they may be based on information drawn from existing LCI databases (secondary data). Primary data is typically collected from manufacturing facilities using questionnaires, and then is modeled using an LCA software package which links primary process data and secondary background processes (e.g., electricity generation and delivery) to generate a complete life cycle inventory. With the inventory complete, the next step in the LCA process is to prepare a life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) of the modeled product system(s) to determine the environmental burden of the various input and output flows throughout the product life cycle using or across a set of impact indicators (e.g., climate change, acidification, etc). Athena Institute: LCA of Curtainwall Framing Materials 1

2.0 Scope of Study The scope of this project was streamlined to exclude processes that the two curtainwall framing product systems have in common (finishing, installation, maintenance) in order to focus the study on the differences between the two curtain wall framing materials. The following unit processes were included within the cradle-to-gate system boundaries for the two products. 1) Upstream-manufacturing: includes resource extraction, commodity input manufacturing, and transportation to the mullion manufacturing facility; and 2) Primary mullion manufacturing: includes energy and resource use, emissions to air, water and land during the fiberglass pultrusion/aluminum extrusion processes. The life cycle assessment assumed a similar service life for both mullion materials and excluded the end-of-life effects as both products are relatively inert and do not require specific handling. However, aluminum is a readily recycled material and its recyclability has been incorporated in this study by considering the recycled content of the commodity aluminum ingot used in building products. Essentially, post-consumer aluminum is recycled back into a wide array of new products, offsetting virgin material use, via the use of secondary (recycled) aluminum in the manufacturing process. The functional unit analyzed for the study is the production of one lineal meter of mullion from the cradle (earth)-to-gate (finished mullion at the manufacturing plant gate). Athena Institute: LCA of Curtainwall Framing Materials 2

3.0 Life Cycle Inventory The following figures define the product systems and boundaries for each curtainwall material alternative considered in the study. Figure 1: Aluminum mullion production system Athena Institute: LCA of Curtainwall Framing Materials 3

Figure 2: Fiberglass mullion production system 3.1 Manufacturing Process The life cycle inventories were completed as a combination of primary and secondary data. Bills of materials for each curtainwall alternative were first obtained through contacts with two manufacturers (Omniglass 1 and Ferguson Glass 2 ). The information they provided included the amount of material present in a lineal meter of each product on a functionally equivalent basis. Aluminum mullion: 2.5 x 4 section with 0.095 thick walls Fiberglass mullion: 2.5 x 6 section with.200 thick walls The constituent materials that are used as inputs to manufacturing the profiles were also provided. Table 1 shows the component bill of materials for each curtainwall mullion alternative. 1 As per Matthew de Witt, Omniglass 2 As per Frank Babienko and Charles Kan, Ferguson Glass Athena Institute: LCA of Curtainwall Framing Materials 4

Table 1: Material Inputs kg per lineal meter of mullion Fiberglass Material Inputs MATERIAL INPUT AMOUNT (kg) Glass Fiber 2.95 Polyethylene Resin 1.24 Calcium Carbonate 0.41 Polyvinyl Acetate Resin 0.28 Primary Ingot 2.04 Aluminum Material Inputs Secondary Ingot 0.72 Secondary Ingot Virgin content portion Secondary Ingot Recycled content portion 0.36 0.36 To model the manufacturing process, Omniglass provided primary data for the fiberglass pultrusion process while secondary LCI data was adapted for the aluminum extrusion process. Table 2 shows the provided energy consumed during the FG pultrusion and aluminum extrusion processes. Table 2: Manufacturing Energy inputs per lineal meter of mullion Fiberglass Pultrusion ENERGY SOURCE Electricity (Pultrusion motor) Electricity (Die Heater) CONSUMPTION 0.25 kwh 0.22 kwh Aluminum Extrusion Electricity 5.55 kwh Natural Gas 0.66 m 3 3.2 Treatment of Recycling in Aluminum LCI Aluminum is manufactured from both virgin resources (primary ingot) and recycled aluminum (secondary ingot), which may incorporate a combination of both industrial process and post-consumer aluminum scrap. The average recycled content of the product at manufacture was determined to be 17% 3 and the formula for the aluminum product mix LCI is: 3 In 2003, 27.4 million tons of virgin aluminum were used to manufacture 33.1 million tons of products, with recycled aluminum scrap accounting for the balance (5.7 Mtons or 17.2%)-Martchek, 2006. These values were similar to the recycled content quoted by Ferguson Glass suppliers. Athena Institute: LCA of Curtainwall Framing Materials 5

0.83 V LCI + 0.17 R LCI where: V LCI = LCI of cradle to commodity for virgin material (primary ingot) R LCI = LCI of aluminum scrap recycling process to produce a 100% secondary ingot 3.3 Resource Transportation to Manufacturer Statistical average data were used to compute the transportation load of delivering the materials from the commodity manufacturer to the curtainwall frame producer. Table 3 shows the distances assumed for each of the material inputs and their total transportation loads, which are the product of the materials mass and distance, expressed on a tonnekilometers (tkm) basis 4. All materials are assumed to be delivered using diesel-fueled combination trucks. Transportation prior to commodity manufacturing (extraction and refinement) was included within the background secondary LCI process data. Table 3: Transportation Data distances and loads per lineal meter of product Fiberglass Material Inputs Aluminum Material Inputs MATERIAL INPUT DISTANCE (km) LOAD (t-km) Glass Fiber 2 716 2.11 Polyethylene Resin 2 372 0.46 Calcium Carbonate 1 107 0.04 Polyvinyl Acetate Resin 2 376 0.11 Primary Ingot 2 405 0.81 Secondary Ingot 2 405 0.30 Sources: 1: StatCan 2000: Trucking in Canada Catalog #053-222 2: StatCan 2003: Trucking in Canada Catalog #353-222 3.4 Resource Extraction and Commodity Manufacturing LCI Data Sources Several secondary data sources were used to model the production of upstream materials prior to their delivery to the frame manufacturers. These data sources either directly reflect North American practice or were modified to do so. 4 A ton kilometer (t-km) is a unit of measure that defines transportation work as a product of the mass of the object (tons) and the distance it is hauled (kilometers). Athena Institute: LCA of Curtainwall Framing Materials 6

USLCI. This database is the preeminent source of life cycle inventory data currently available in North America. The USLCI database contains energy production and delivery models for thermal fuels, electricity generation, and transportation equipment. USLCI data is of recent vintage (within the last five years) and is publicly and freely available from www.nrel.gov/lci. USLCI data were used to model all energy inputs, transportation effects, aluminum profile extrusion, and were merged with European data to make these data more representative. Ecoinvent. This database contains 3,500 processes that are based on European practice and have undergone peer review. Ecoinvent data were used to model the fiberglass manufacturing process with USLCI data substituted for the energy inputs to reflect North American fuel use and conditions. (http://www.ecoinvent.ch/) International Aluminum Institute. In 2007, the International Aluminum Institute published an update of their life cycle inventory data for primary aluminum based on the 2005 production year. These data include process inputs and emissions for bauxite mining, anode and alumina manufacture, as well as smelting and ingot casting. USLCI energy data were modeled as inputs to these processes. (http://www.world-aluminium.org/) European Aluminum Association. The European Aluminum Association provided LCI data for the recycling (gathering, sorting, and bailing) as well as secondary ingot melting processes. (http://www.eaa.net/) All manufacturing flows and upstream material and energy carriers were modeled in SimaPro v7.18 an internationally recognized LCA software tool. The SimaPro software is capable of modeling a complete product LCI (inclusive of upstream processes) and contains various life cycle impact assessment methodologies for generating impact indicator results. Athena Institute: LCA of Curtainwall Framing Materials 7

4.0 Life Cycle Impact Assessment 4.1 Methodology The unit process LCI results for the two curtainwall mullion systems were then classified and characterized into four impact assessment indicators using the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) s TRACI (Tool for the Reduction and Assessment of Chemical and other Environmental Impacts) impact assessment methodologies and factors. The life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) methodology also reports cumulative energy demand, which breaks the consumed energy for a product system into fossil and renewable sources and thereby can indicate the degree to which a product system may be depleting nonrenewable fossil fuels. Characterization results are typically compiled using a reference emission flow and multipliers or factors to equate the effect on an equivalent basis to that of the reference emission flow e.g., all greenhouse gases are reported on a mass basis using carbon dioxide as the equivalence (eq) greenhouse gas reference flow to arrive at an overall global warming potential effect. The four selected environmental impact assessment indicators and the cumulative energy demand measure are described below. Global Warming Potential (kg CO 2 eq). The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has made significant strides towards a uniformly accepted categorization of the greenhouse forcing potential of global warming agents. The 2007 version of their factors were incorporated in this impact assessment. Acidification Potential (H+ moles eq.). Acidification affects fresh water and forest ecosystems and causes human health effects when high concentrations of sulphur dioxide are attained. Acid rain generally causes increases in the alkalinity of soils and freshwater lakes that is measured in terms of the hydrogen ions that are produced as a result of different acid emissions as described in TRACI characterization factors. Smog Potential (kg NO x eq.). Under certain climatic conditions, air emissions from industry and transportation can be trapped at ground level where, in the presence of sunlight, they produce photochemical smog. The TRACI characterization of smog precursors is based on their intensities relative to nitrogen oxides, the most prevalent smog sources. Eutrophication Potential (kg N eq.). Eutrophication is the effect of overfertilization of soil and water ecosystems caused by atmospheric emissions. Algae blooms that result in foul odors and eventual depletion of fish are Athena Institute: LCA of Curtainwall Framing Materials 8

symptoms of eutrophication. The TRACI characterization of eutrophication agents is based on their equivalence to nitrogen. Cumulative Energy Demand (MJ). Energy accounting is generally conducted to determine the total demand of a system on renewable and non-renewable sources. This convention is maintained here with totals given for each. Athena Institute: LCA of Curtainwall Framing Materials 9

5.0 Results Table 1 indicates that the fiberglass mullion is about 40% more resource intensive than its more conventional aluminum counterpart. However, the process of extruding aluminum is considerably more energy intensive than the fiberglass pultrusion process. Given the higher mass of the fiberglass mullion it is not surprising that it requires more than twice the transportation of raw resources as that of the conventional aluminum mullion. The complete cradle-to-gate LCIA results for one meter of aluminum and fiberglass curtainwall mullion are shown in Table 4 and Table 5, respectively. For the aluminum profile (Table 4), roughly 75% of the energy use in the life cycle is used to manufacture aluminum ingot from virgin resources. The extrusion process is the next most burdensome process higher than recycled aluminum production. Resource transportation is found to be a minor contributor to the overall profile. The results in the other impact categories correlate closely with the energy use as most are the direct result of fossil fuel combustion and related emissions. For the fiberglass mullion profile, glass fiber production contributes 50% of the energy and is the most significant contributor to the other impacts (see Table 5). Greater than 70% of greenhouse gases are emitted in the glass fiber manufacture with process emissions (limestone oxidation) causing the increased significance in this category. High density polyetylene (HDPE) production is the next most significant contributor to the overall fiberglass mullion environmental profile. The fiberglass pultrusion process itself ranks as a minor contributor to the overall environmental profile for the fiberglass mullion. Table 4: LCIA Results for 1 meter of aluminum curtainwall mullion profile Impact Category Unit Total Profile per Meter Virgin Aluminum Embodied Recycled Aluminum Embodied Delivery of Inputs Extrusion Global Warming kg CO2 eq 30.05 23.76 0.28 0.10 5.91 Acidification H+ moles eq 14.53 11.82 0.03 0.03 2.64 Smog kg NOx eq 8.06E-02 6.23E-02 3.30E-04 7.10E-04 1.72E-02 Eutrophication kg N eq 3.49E-03 2.82E-03 1.66E-05 3.27E-05 6.25E-04 Total Energy MJ eq 442.46 334.77 4.23 1.42 102.05 Non renewable, fossil MJ eq 421.87 328.24 3.70 1.40 88.53 Non-renewable, nuclear MJ eq 20.49 6.50 0.46 0.01 13.52 Total Renewable MJ eq 0.10 0.03 0.07 0.00 0.00 Athena Institute: LCA of Curtainwall Framing Materials 10

Table 5: LCIA Results for 1 meter of fiberglass curtainwall mullion profile Impact Category Unit Total Profile per Meter Glass Fiber Embodied HDPE Resin Embodied Other inputs Embodied Delivery of Inputs Pultrusion Global Warming kg CO2 eq 12.16 8.60 1.62 0.34 1.24 0.36 Acidification H+ moles eq 7.55 4.61 1.95 0.41 0.41 0.16 Smog kg NOx eq 4.79E-02 3.31E-02 4.01E-03 9.58E-04 8.54E-03 1.29E-03 Eutrophication kg N eq 3.08E-03 2.28E-03 2.94E-04 6.84E-05 3.94E-04 4.30E-05 Total Energy MJ eq 278.10 138.51 95.37 20.99 17.03 6.20 Non renewable, fossil MJ eq 260.42 123.48 94.25 20.72 16.89 5.08 Non-renewable, nuclear MJ eq 17.00 14.34 1.12 0.27 0.14 1.12 Total Renewable MJ eq 0.68 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 The LCIA results of the two cradle-to-gate systems were then compared and the results are shown in Figure 3. As each impact indicator uses different units, showing all results on one graph required setting the aluminum mullion results to one and then normalizing the fiberglass mullion results as a percentage of the aluminum total. Figure 3: Comparison graph of aluminum and fiberglass profile Athena Institute: LCA of Curtainwall Framing Materials 11

The results indicate a strong preference for the fiberglass mullion profile. Across each indicator measure the fiberglass mullion profile demonstrates a lower cradle-to-gate environmental impact. Depending on the impact indicator of interest, the fiberglass mullion results are between 40% to 90% of the aluminum mullion environmental burden results. Athena Institute: LCA of Curtainwall Framing Materials 12

6.0 References Martchek, 2006. Modelling More Sustainable Aluminium, Int. J. LCA, 11(1) www.alcoa.com/global/en/about_alcoa/sustainability/pdfs/kmartchek_ijlca_7772.pdf StatCan 2000. Statistics Canada, Trucking in Canada, Catalog # 053-222, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Retrieved on June 20, 2009 from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/53-222-x/53-222-x2000000-eng.pdf StatCan 2003. Statistics Canada, Trucking in Canada, Catalog # 353-222, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Retrieved on June 20, 2009 from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/53-222-x/53-222-x2003000-eng.pdf Jane C. Bare, Gregory A. Norris, David W. Pennington, and Thomas McKone, 2003. TRACI-The Tool for the Reduction and Assessment of Chemical and Other Environmental Impacts, Journal of Industrial Ecology, Volume 6, Number 3 4, 2003. Updated in 2007 via personal correspondence with Jane Bare. Athena Institute: LCA of Curtainwall Framing Materials 13