Elementary Education Mentor Student Teaching Evaluation

Similar documents
Arkansas Teaching Standards

New Jersey Professional Standards for Teachers Alignment with InTASC NJAC 6A:9C-3.3 (effective May 5, 2014)

ILLINOIS CERTIFICATION TESTING SYSTEM

TOOL KIT for RESIDENT EDUCATOR and MENT OR MOVES

Teacher Education Portfolio Guidelines and Rubric

TESOL Standards for P-12 ESOL Teacher Education = Unacceptable 2 = Acceptable 3 = Target

ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARDS (2013)

Pre-service Performance Assessment Professional Standards for Teachers: See 603 CMR 7.08

Candidates will demonstrate ethical attitudes and behaviors.

North Carolina TEACHER. evaluation process. Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction

Course Report for EDI Meth/Strategies of Sec Tchng

EXAMPLE FIELD EXPERIENCE PLANNING TEMPLATE CCSU MAT Program

Final Intern Evaluation

UNDERGRADUATE TEACHER EDUCATION CERTIFICATION CARDINAL STRITCH UNIVERSITY

Greenville City Schools. Teacher Evaluation Tool

Sample Completed Summative Report Form for a Secondary Teacher 1*

Teacher Candidate Handbook. Urban Institute for Teacher Education

InTASC. Model Core Teaching Standards: A Resource for State Dialogue

N.J.A.C. 6A:9, PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS TABLE OF CONTENTS

APPENDIX A: Examples of Observations and Documentation

FLORIDA TEACHER STANDARDS for ESOL ENDORSEMENT 2010

Master s in Educational Leadership Ed.S. in Administration and Supervision

The performance assessment shall measure the extent to which the teacher s planning:

Dewar College of Education and Human Services Valdosta State University Department of Early Childhood and Special Education

Section III. An Excellent Christian Teacher. Characteristics and Expectations. GRCS Handbook 1

Mathematics Education Master of Education Degree Program PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO RUBRIC Candidate: ID#: Date: Evaluator:

1. The teacher candidate sets learning targets that address the Essential Academic Learning Requirements and the state learning goals.

Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems

GEORGIA STANDARDS FOR THE APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION UNITS AND EDUCATOR PREPARATION PROGRAMS

TExES Pedagogy and Professional Responsibilities (PPR) EC 12 (160) Test at a Glance

How To Write A Thesis

THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY. Add on Certification Program English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) Endorsement

Section Two: Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession

Completed Formal Classroom Observation Form

LITERACY: READING LANGUAGE ARTS

1. Candidates understand the theoretical and evidence-based foundations of reading and writing processes and instruction as follows:

Standard Two: Knowledge of Mathematics: The teacher shall be knowledgeable about mathematics and mathematics instruction.

Colorado Professional Teaching Standards

Possible examples of how the Framework For Teaching could apply to Instructional Coaches

Professional Development Needs Assessment for Teachers

Reading Competencies

Course-Based Key Assessment #4 ESOL Teaching Portfolio and Reflective Summary of Field Experience Used in TESL 5040 Practicum in ESOL

EDTC Program Assessment Framework

UCC/UGC/ECCC Proposal for Plan Change or Plan Deletion

Master of Arts in English Language Learning for Grade PreK 12 Teachers

CEC Special Education Specialist Advanced Preparation Standards 1

Tackling the NEW Teacher Evaluation Guidelines

Idaho Standards for Online Teachers

Employee s Name. Academic/Fiscal Year Position School. Years of Service with Division Years in Present Position

EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY THE TEACHERS COLLEGE. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT: ED334 Spring, 2011 Three Hours

Requirements EDAM WORD STUDY K-3: PRINT AWARENESS, LETTER KNOWLEDGE, PHONICS, AND HIGH FREQUENCY WORDS

Teacher Evaluation. Missouri s Educator Evaluation System

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Instructional Technology Facilitators

CALIFORNIA S TEACHING PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS (TPE)

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: Speech-Language Pathologists

Self-Assessment Duval County School System. Level 3. Level 3. Level 3. Level 4

ESOL Endorsement Program

Idaho Standards for Online Teachers

Illinois Professional Teaching Standards

Utah Educational Leadership Standards, Performance Expectations and Indicators

Masters of Science (MS) in Educational Psychology

Handbook for Applicants

The School District of Osceola County, Florida Melba Luciano, Superintendent ENGLISH FOR SPEAKERS OF OTHER LANGUAGES (ESOL) ADD-ON ENDORSEMENT

The Ohio Resident Educator Program Standards Planning Tool Final

MILLIKIN TEACHING STANDARDS

Mississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric M-STAR

NEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS

Masters Comprehensive Exam and Rubric (Rev. July 17, 2014)

Alignment Table School Counseling. Austin Peay State University Professional Educational Standards, CACREP STANDARDS, and NCATE Standards

NPS Formative Assessment Report Form (Counseling, Psychologists, and Social Workers)

1. Department of Curriculum and Instruction ELE 499 Course Title: Supervised Student Teaching in Primary Through Fifth Grade Credit Hours: 12

Elementary MEd I. The Relationship of the Program with the Unit s Conceptual Framework

Radford University TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM

Professional Education Matrix

N.J.A.C. 6A:9, PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS

Correlation Map of LEARNING-FOCUSED to Marzano s Evaluation Model

Standards of Quality and Effectiveness for Professional Teacher Preparation Programs APPENDIX A

GLOBAL-READY TEACHER COMPETENCY FRAMEWORK: STANDARDS AND INDICATORS

Master of Arts in Teaching, Social Science for Grade 5 12 Teachers

Teaching MAT ADMISSION REQUIREMENTS APPLICATION PROCEDURES. Towson University 1

TEACHERS OF READING.

The ESOL and Bilingual/ESOL Graduate Program Endorsement

New Jersey Educator Preparation Program Approval Application DRAFT Fall, 2015

1 REVISOR C. show verification of completing a Board of Teaching preparation program

B.A. in Education Specialization: Early Childhood Education (P-3) Student Handbook

Revisioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina Master of Arts in Elementary Education Appalachian State University

Field Experience and Student Teaching Competencies

Key Principles for ELL Instruction (v6)

ASU College of Education Course Syllabus ED 4972, ED 4973, ED 4974, ED 4975 or EDG 5660 Clinical Teaching

NC TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS SAMPLE EVIDENCES AND ARTIFACTS

The School Leadership Collaborative Intern and Administrative Mentor Guide

St. Joseph s College Education Department Handbook for Student Teachers Cooperating Teachers College Supervisors

School of Education MASTER OF ARTS IN TEACHING. Master of Arts in Teaching

Such alternatives to the above qualifications as the board may find appropriate and acceptable.

OSU CASCADES. Master of Arts in Teaching Program ESOL Endorsement and/or Middle and High School Education Program Winter 2014

FINAL EVALUATION Professional Phase. Teacher Candidate s Name: ID# Date. Certification area: Special Education. Field Supervisor:

Autism Spectrum Disorder Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria Rubric

Pre-Requisites EDAM-5001 Early Literacy Guiding Principles and Language

Special Education Student Learning Outcomes

North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards

Transcription:

Elementary Education Mentor Student Teaching Evaluation Midterm q Final q Student Name: Date: Mentor Teacher: School: Grade: The mentor will use this form to evaluate the student teacher in their classroom. The appropriate ratings should be entered below. This information will be included in the Conference Summary report where the mentor teacher, supervisor, and student teacher will sign verifying agreement. This form becomes a part of the student teacher s permanent record. Utah Effective Teaching Standards Learner and Learning S1 S2 S3 Learner Development Learning Differences Learning Environment Average Scores INSTRUCTIONS Transfer the average scores from each page to the front of this form. Add the average scores to find the total score. Grades/Scores Check the average score given with the corresponding grade below: Instructional Practices Professional Responsibility ESL Endorsement S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 Content Knowledge Assessment Instructional Planning Instructional Strategies Reflection/Continuous Growth Leadership and Collaboration Professional/Ethical Behavior A 3.8 4.0 A- 3.6-3.7 B+ 3.5 B 3.3 3.4 B- 3.2 C+ 3.1 C 3.0 C- 2.8 2.9 D+ 2.7 D 2.5 2.6 D- 2.4 F 2.3 Add up Average Scores and Divide by 11 = Total Score Mentor Teacher Signature: 1

Instructions for completion of the Student Teaching Evaluation: The evaluation outlines categories consistent with the Dixie State University Department of Education and the Utah Effective Teaching Standards (UETS). The standards are included below. This form becomes a part of the student teacher s permanent record and will be available to principals and human resource personnel. As you score the teacher candidate, remember that your evaluation is for a beginning teacher, one who is likely to start teaching the next school year. To give a complete picture of the skills of the teacher candidate, it is important for prospective employers to have both quantitative and qualitative data. The evaluation includes a section for both. It is important for the mentor teacher and the supervisor to complete all portions of this report as completely as possible. NOTE: Scores will automatically generate on the cover page based on scores entered below. Utah Effective Teaching Standards: LEARNER AND LEARNING Teaching begins with the learner. To ensure that each student learns new knowledge and skills, teacher candidates must understand that learning and developmental patterns vary among individuals, that learners bring unique individual differences to the learning process, and that learners need supportive and safe learning environments to thrive. Standard 1 Learner Development Standard 2 Learning Differences Standard 3 Learning Environment INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICE Effective instructional practice requires that teacher candidates have a deep and flexible understanding of their content areas and be able to draw upon content knowledge as they work with learners to access information, apply knowledge in the real-world settings and address meaningful issues. They must also understand and integrate assessment, planning, and instructional strategies in coordinated and engaging ways to assure learner mastery of the content. Standard 4 Content Knowledge Standard 5 Assessment Standard 6 Instructional Planning Standard 7 Instructional Strategies PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY Creating and supporting safe, productive learning environments that result in learners achieving at the highest levels is a teacher s primary responsibility. To do this well, teacher candidates must engage in meaningful, intensive professional learning by regularly examining practice through ongoing study, self-reflection, and collaboration. They must be aware of legal and ethical requirements and engage in the highest levels of professional and ethical conduct. Standard 8 Reflection/Continuous Growth Standard 9 Leadership/Collaboration Standard 10 Professional/Ethical Behavior 2

QUANTITATIVE SECTION Read the descriptions of the performance levels in each category, and rate the teacher candidate s performance on the 1-4 scale and check the corresponding box. (See Scoring Rubric Below) If you feel the student is performing between levels, you can give a score such as, 3.5. Student Teaching Evaluation Scoring Rubric for Performance Ratings: Proficient Skills 4 Basic Skills 3 Needs Work 2 Not Acceptable 1 Student teacher demonstrates proficient skills. Student teacher consistently meets the indicator. He/she accomplishes the task at least 90% of the time. Student teacher demonstrates basic skills. Student teacher generally meets the indicator. He/she accomplishes the task at least 75% of the time. Student teacher demonstrates emerging skills. Student teacher partially meets the indicator. He/she accomplishes the task(s) only 50% of the time. Student is not able to perform the task successfully, uses inappropriate instructional strategies or makes inappropriate decisions. CATEGORY 1: LEARNER AND LEARNING Standard 1: Learner Development The teacher understands cognitive, linguistic, social, emotional and physical areas of student development. Performance Ratings for Standard 1: Learner Development 1a 1b Creates developmentally appropriate and challenging learning experiences to explicitly address each student s learning strengths, interests, and needs. Collaborates with families, colleagues, and other professionals to promote student growth and development. Total Score for Standard 1: Learner Development divided by 2 = Average Score CATEGORY 1: LEARNER AND LEARNING Standard 2: Learning Differences The teacher understands individual learner differences and cultural linguistic diversity. Performance Ratings for Standard 2: Learning Differences 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e Understands individual learner differences, and holds high expectations of students. Designs, adapts, and delivers instruction to address each student s diverse learning strengths and needs. Allows students different ways to demonstrate learning that are sensitive to multiple and diverse experience. Creates a learning culture that encourages individual learners to persevere and advance. Incorporates tools of language development into planning and instruction, and supports development of English proficiency through speaking, listening, reading and writing. Total Score for Standard 2: Learning Differences divided by 5 = Average Score 3

CATEGORY 1: LEARNER AND LEARNING Standard 3: Learning Environment The teacher works with learners to create environments that support individual and collaborative learning, positive social interactions, active engagement in learning and self-motivation. Performance Ratings for Standard 3: Learning Environment 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f Establishes and monitors consistent procedures and standards to develop self-directed learners who internalize classroom routines, expectations, and procedures. Establishes a positive learning climate of openness, respectful interactions, responsibility, support, and inquiry. Uses a variety of classroom management strategies to effectively maintain a positive learning environment. Organizes, allocates, and manages the resources of time, space, and attention to actively and equitably engage students in learning. Uses appropriate technology and media resources to enhance instruction & extend the learning environment. Fosters an environment that encourages students to use higher-order thinking skills in various real-world contexts. Total Score for Standard 3: Learning Environment divided by 6 = Average Score 4

CATEGORY 2: INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICE Standard 4: Content Knowledge The teacher understands the central concepts, tools of inquiry and structures of the discipline. Performance Ratings for Standard 4: Content Knowledge 4a 4b 4c Knows and uses content knowledge and conveys accurate information and concepts to give compelling lessons with rich and varied details. Demonstrates awareness of Utah core standards. Supports students in learning and using academic language accurately and meaningfully. Total Score for Standard 4: Content Knowledge divided by 3 = Average Score CATEGORY 2: INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICE Standard 5: Assessment The teacher used multiple methods of assessment to engage learners in their own growth, monitor learner progress, guide planning and instruction, and determine whether the outcomes described in content standards have been met. Performance Ratings for Standard 5: Assessment 5a 5b 5c Uses formative and summative assessments that match learning objectives. Identifies the elements of quality work and provides students with descriptive feedback to guide their progress. Adjusts assessment methods to provide accommodations for diverse students. 5d Uses data to assess the effectiveness of instruction and to make adjustments in planning and instruction. 5e Documents student progress and provides descriptive feedback to students in a variety of ways. Total Score for Standard 5: Assessment divided by 5 = Average Score CATEGORY 2: INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICE Standard 6: Instructional Planning The teacher plans instruction to support students in meeting rigorous learning goals by drawing upon knowledge of content areas, Utah Core Standards, instructional best practices and the community context. Performance Ratings for Standard 6: Instructional Planning 6a 6b 6c 6d 6e Plans instruction based on Utah Core Standards. Creates learning experiences that are appropriate for reaching content standards relevant to learners, and based on principles of effective instruction. Differentiates instruction for individuals and groups of students by choosing appropriate strategies, accommodations, and resources. Creates opportunities for students to generate and evaluate new ideas, seek inventive solutions to problems, and create original work. Integrates cross-disciplinary skills into instruction to purposefully engage learners in applying content knowledge. Total Score for Standard 6: Instructional Planning divided by 5 = Average Score 5

CATEGORY 2: INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICE Standard 7: Instructional Strategies The teacher uses various instructional strategies to ensure that all learners develop a deep understanding of content areas and their connections. The teacher builds skills to apply and extend knowledge in meaningful ways. Performance Ratings for Standard 7: Assessment 7a 7b 7c 7d 7e 7f 7g 7h Understands and practices a range of developmentally, culturally, and linguistically appropriate instructional strategies. Uses appropriate strategies and resources to adapt instruction and varies roles to meet the needs of individuals and groups of learners. Analyzes student errors and misconceptions in order to redirect, focus, and deepen learning. Uses a variety of instructional strategies to support and expand each learner s communication skills. Provides multiple opportunities for students to develop higher-order and meta-cognitive skills. Provides opportunities for students to understand, question, and analyze information from multiple and diverse sources and perspectives to answer questions and solve real-world problems. Supports content and skill development by using multiple media and technology resources and knows how to evaluate these resources for quality, accuracy, and effectiveness. Uses a variety of questioning strategies to promote engagement and learning. Total Score for Standard 7: Instructional Strategies divided by 8 = Average Score 6

CATEGORY 3: PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY Standard 8: Reflection and Continuous Growth The teacher is a reflective practitioner who uses evidence to continually evaluate and adapt practice to meet the needs of each learner. Performance Ratings for Standard 8: Reflection and Continuous Growth 8a 8b 8c 8d Uses a variety of data to evaluate the outcomes of teaching and learning to reflect on and adapt planning and practice. Actively seeks professional, community and technological learning experience for reflection and problem solving. Recognizes and reflects on personal and professional biases and accesses resources to deepen understanding of differences. Actively considers new ideas and improves teaching and learning by drawing on current research. Total Score for Standard 8: Reflection and Continuous Growth divided by 4 = Average Score CATEGORY 3: PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY Standard 9: Leadership and Collaboration The teacher is a leader who engages collaboratively with learners, families, colleagues, and community members to build a shared vision and supportive professional culture focused on student growth and success. Performance Ratings for Standard 9: Leadership and Collaboration 9a 9b 9c 9d Actively participates in shared responsibility for decision making and accountability for each student s learning. Advocates for the learners, the school, the community, and the profession. Works with other school professionals to plan and jointly facilitate learning to meet diverse needs of learners. Engages in professional learning to enhance knowledge and skill. Total Score for Standard 9: Leadership and Collaboration divided by 4 = Average Score CATEGORY 3: PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY Standard 10: Professional and Ethical Behavior The teacher demonstrates the highest standard of legal, moral, and ethical conduct as specified in Utah State Board Rule R277 515. Performance Ratings for Standard 9: Leadership and Collaboration 10a 10b 10c 10d Understands and is responsible for compliance with state and local policies. Demonstrates legal, moral, ethical conduct, and acts as a role model. Maintains integrity and confidentiality in matters concerning student records and collegial consultation. Collaborates with and demonstrates a professional disposition with mentors, supervisors, peers, and students Total Score for Standard 10: Professional and Ethical Behavior divided by 4 = Average Score Transfer the average scores from each of the categories to the front of the evaluation. (Page 1) 7

QUALITATIVE SECTION Please write a narrative description of the student teacher s demonstration of each respective category. These comments should reflect evidence of activities, projects, or strategies the student teacher has planned and/or implemented in the classroom. Category I Learner and Learning. Evidence of teacher candidate s performance specific to the following standards: Standard 1-Learner Development. The teacher understands cognitive, linguistic, social, emotional and physical areas of student development. Standard 2-Learning Differences. The teacher understands individual learner differences and cultural linguistic diversity. Standard 3-Learning Environment. The teacher works with learners to create environments that support individual and collaborative learning, positive social interactions, active engagement in learning and self-motivation. Category II Instructional Practice. Evidence of teacher candidate s performance specific to the following standards: Standard 4-Content Knowledge. The teacher understands the central concepts, tools of inquiry and structures of the discipline. Standard 5-Assessment. The teacher used multiple methods of assessment to engage learners in their own growth, monitor learner progress, guide planning and instruction, and determine whether the outcomes described in content standards have been met. Standard 6-Instructional Planning. The teacher plans instruction to support students in meeting rigorous learning goals by drawing upon knowledge of content areas, Utah Core Standards, instructional best practices and the community context. Standard 7-Instructional Strategies. The teacher uses various instructional strategies to ensure that all learners develop a deep understanding of content areas and their connections. The teacher builds skills to apply and extend knowledge in meaningful ways. 8

QUALITATIVE SECTION CONTINUED Please write a narrative description of the student teacher s demonstration of each respective category. These comments should reflect evidence of activities, projects, or strategies the student teacher has planned and/or implemented in the classroom. Category III Professional Responsibility. Evidence of teacher candidate s performance specific to the following standards: Standard 8-Reflection and Continuous Growth. The teacher is a reflective practitioner who uses evidence to continually evaluate and adapt practice to meet the needs of each learner. Standard 9-Leadership and Collaboration. The teacher is a leader who engages collaboratively with learners, families, colleagues, and community members to build a shared vision and supportive professional culture focused on student growth and success. Standard 10-Professional and Ethical Behavior. The teacher demonstrates the highest standard of legal, moral, and ethical conduct as specified in Utah State Board Rule R277 515. 9

ESL Endorsement Teacher candidate: Demonstrates understanding of language as a system, and language acquisition and development Uses major concepts, principles, theories, and research related to the nature and role of culture and cultural groups to construct supportive learning environments Uses evidence- based practices and strategies to plan, implement, differentiate and manage standards- based ESL and content instruction. Demonstrates understanding of issues and concepts of assessment and uses standards Language Utilizes activities that use all language skills (reading, writing, listening and speaking). Introduces key vocabulary words using the four skills, (reading, writing listening and speaking). Speech is appropriate for students proficiency level (slower rate, enunciation, simple sentence structure for beginners). Culture Designs classrooms that are supportive, positive climates of learning for culturally and linguistically diverse ELL students. Uses a range of resources, including the internet, to learn about world cultures and specifically the cultures of students in their classroom, selects, adapts, and uses culturally responsive, age-appropriate, and linguistically accessible materials. Instruction Focuses on individual educational needs of ELL students. Uses information about their students academic backgrounds to choose appropriate and effective teaching techniques. Explicitly links concepts to students cultural background experiences. Plans for multi-level instruction that embeds assessment, includes scaffolding, and provides re-teaching when necessary for students to successfully meet learning objectives. Assessment Assessment issues relate to ELLs. (bias, additional time, format/test settings, accountability, validity, etc.). Assesses students content learning by using multiple measures and procedures for developmental needs of ELL students. Assesses students language learning by using multiple measures and procedures for developmental needs of ELL students. Total Score: Divided by # of Standards Observed = Average Score Evidence of teacher candidate s performance specific to ESL Practices and Strategies: 10