A recent UK NEQAS pilot distribution highlights the need for standardisation of EBV DNA quantification.

Similar documents
2011 Update on the ECIL-3 guidelines for EBV management in patients with leukemia and other hematological disorders

Epstein-Barr virus-associated lymphoproliferative disease following allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Detection of Multiple Double-Stranded DNA Viruses after Cord Blood Transplantation is Frequent and Persistent

Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) complications following HSCT: from viremia to post transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) and lymphoma

Lymphomas after organ transplantation

Quantitative HBV DNA measurements and the management of infected health care workers

BEIPH Final Report. QCMD 2010 Hepatitis B Virus DNA (HBVDNA10A) EQA Programme. William G MacKay on behalf of QCMD and its Scientific Council July 2010

Molecular Diagnosis of Hepatitis B and Hepatitis D infections

Cytoreductive Therapy for Autologous Cell Therapy in HIV

RealStar HBV PCR Kit /2012

HBV DNA < monitoring interferon Rx

Narrator: Transplants using stem cells from the blood, bone marrow or umbilical cord blood

Estimated New Cases of Leukemia, Lymphoma, Myeloma 2014

NP/PA Clinical Hepatology Fellowship Summary of Year-Long Curriculum

Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) Serological Diagnosis of Epstein Barr Virus. Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) Epstein Barr Virus (EBV)

Haematopoietic Chimerism Analysis after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Stem Cell Transplantation

INTERPRETATION INFORMATION SHEET

Umbilical Cord Blood Stem Cells Current Status & Future Potential

Challenges of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Robert J. Soiffer, MD Dana Farber Cancer Institute

10 th Annual International Cord Blood Transplantation Symposium June 7-9, 2012 Preliminary Scientific Program. Thursday, June 7

Heart transplantation

Clinical Commissioning Policy: Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. April Reference: NHSCB/B04/P/a

Automation and standardisation of NIPD

Corporate Medical Policy

HBV Quantitative Real Time PCR Kit

Reference: NHS England B04/P/a

Blood cells are vital to the human body

WBMT Global Survey. Helen Baldomero Cape Town November Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Mobile Lab-Diagnostik

Data Reporting Problems

Cytomegalovirus (HHV5/CMV) Roseolovirus (HHV6 & 7)

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 212th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 23, 2006

Executive summary. Executive summary 8

PROTOCOLS FOR TREATMENT OF MALIGNANT LYMPHOMA

Corporate Medical Policy

A Gift for life. HTA Licence No

CHAPTER 1 BACKGROUND AND CORD BLOOD BANK (CBB) ORGANIZATION

Corporate Medical Policy Cord Blood as a Source of Stem Cells

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Imad A. Tabbara, M.D. Professor of Medicine

storage and handling of unused stem cell products Swiss consensus?

The CVN Development Programme a 4-month update

EBV-VCA IgA Cat #

CPT Codes for Bone Marrow Transplant January 2015 James L. Gajewski, MD

Point of Care HIV Viral Load Testing:

information for payers and referrers

Viral Hepatitis APHL survey report

Therapeutic and Prophylactic AdE1- LMPpoly-Based Adoptive T cell Immunotherapy for Epstein Barr Virus- Associated Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Stem Cell Transplantation In Patients with Fanconi Anemia

Changes to UK NEQAS Leucocyte Immunophenotyping Chimerism Performance Monitoring Systems From April Uncontrolled Copy

Selecting Appropriate Blood Products for Recipients of ABO/Rh Mismatched Stem Cell Transplants. Summary of Significant Changes. Purpose.

A Cure for Sickle Cell Anemia and Thalassemia

1.1.2 Amend the that the Special Authority relating to tenofovir for use in pregnancy for postpartum care;

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE, HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT CLINICAL BIOLOGY COMMISSION CLINICAL BIOLOGY SECTION

Summary of Advisory Council on Blood Stem Cell Transplantation: Recommendations and Status

Bone Marrow/Stem Cell Transplant

Stable as a table MIDG 4/8/2015. Jillian Lau Monash Health

Center Activity (07/01/ /30/2010) Center Region United States Tables for More Information

Evaluation of Blood Screening Nucleic Acid Tests (NAT) for Detection of Various HCV and HIV Genotypes

LYMPHOMA. BACHIR ALOBEID, M.D. HEMATOPATHOLOGY DIVISION PATHOLOGY DEPARTMENT Columbia University/ College of Physicians & Surgeons

EUROCORD. in 49 countries and 484 transplant centres* 264 EBMT 4847 (73%) cases 220 Non-EBMT 1797 (27%) cases

Dosaggi Sierologici e Molecolari nelle Epatiti B e C METODI MOLECOLARI. Ombretta Turriziani Dipartimento di Medicina Molecolare

cancer cancer Hessamfar-Bonarek M et al. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2010;39:

PRE-OLT INFECTIOUS WORK UP

Therapeutic Treatment Options: Chronic Blood Transfusions Bone Marrow Transplantation. Marianne E. McPherson Yee, MD, MSc

Corporate Medical Policy Cord Blood as a Source of Stem Cells

ALBERTA BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANT PROGRAM NEW GUIDELINES FOR THE IMMUNIZATION OF HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANT(HSCT) RECIPIENTS JULY 11, 2013

Chapter 13: Viral Diseases

What is a Stem Cell Transplantation?

Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation

THE INFLUENCE OF TISSUE (IN)COMPATIBILITY IN UMBILICAL CORD BLOOD TRANSPLANTATION

Jamie Peregrine, MD, PGY-4 KU-Wichita, OB/GYN Wesley Medical Center

Interesting Case Review. Renuka Agrawal, MD Dept. of Pathology City of Hope National Medical Center Duarte, CA

KHA-CARI guideline: Cytomegalovirus disease and kidney transplantationnep_

CDC TB Testing Guidelines and Recent Literature Update

PURPOSE: To define the criteria to be used to determine the medical necessity of antiviral therapy in the treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B.

Determining Donor Eligibility Blood Donor vs. Stem Cell Donor. Wanda Koetz, RN, HPC Clinical Nurse Lead, Memorial Blood Centers ASFA - May 7, 2015

Hematologic Malignancies/Stem Cell Transplantation Program Clinical Section UCLA Health System Los Angeles, CA 90095

Best Practices for Maintaining Quality in Molecular Diagnostics Gyorgy Abel, MD, PhD

14.0 Stem Cell Laboratory Services

APPENDIX B SAMPLE INFORMED CONSENT FORM

CAP Accreditation Checklists 2015 Edition

Helping you find the one match.. Guide for Unrelated Stem Cell Transplant Patients OneMatch Stem Cell and Marrow Network BLOOD.

Solid Organ Transplantation

Phone: Fax:

Appendix 7.5: Immunization for Children Expecting Solid Organ Transplant after 18 Months of Age (Catch-up and Ongoing Schedule)

STEM CELL FACTS. The ISSCR is an independent, nonproft organization providing a global forum for stem cell research and regenerative medicine.

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

4/25/2016. Transplant Journey. Objectives. Reason for Transplantation at Mayo Clinic. Mayo Clinic Model of Care

INFORMATION ON STEM CELLS/BONE MARROW AND REINFUSION/TRANSPLANTATION SUR

Genetic Testing in Research & Healthcare

Disclosures. I have no disclosures.

RealLine HCV PCR Qualitative - Uni-Format

Molecular Assessment of Dried Blood Spot Quality during Development of a Novel Automated. Screening

-General Information -Why Save the Umbilical Cord? -Pros and Cons ((Arguments Against Saving the Umbilical Cord)) -Pros and Cons ((Arguments For

Epstein Barr Virus (Human Herpes virus 4) genesig Standard Kit. DNA testing. Everything... Everyone... Everywhere...

LCD for Viral Hepatitis Serology Tests

Center Outcomes Reporting in the US Successes and Challenges J. Douglas Rizzo, MD MS

Long-term Results of Pegylated Interferon alfa-2a and Tenofovir for Hepatitis B

Transcription:

SoGAT Clinical Diagnostics III- A recent UK NEQAS pilot distribution highlights the need for standardisation of EBV DNA quantification. Brigitte Senechal, Habib Seyedzadeh, Anneline Rossouw, Vivienne James UK NEQAS EBV DNA quantification pilot distribution 1

INTRODUCTION-1 EBV EBV infects more than 95% of the population and persists life-long mostly in a latent state in B-lymphocytes. The infection is usually subclinical and occasionally results in infectious mononucleosis syndrome in adolescents. In immunosuppressed patients, including AIDS patients and graft recipients, the viral reactivation (and primary infection children) can occur and may induce lymphoproliferative disorders. EBV is also strongly associated with neoplasms such as Burkitt lymphomas and nasopharyngeal carcinoma. In all these conditions, EBV DNA can be detected in the blood but not in the blood of healthy donors with a past infection. UK NEQAS EBV DNA quantification pilot distribution 2

INTRODUCTION-2 Prevention of the post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) EBV DNA-emia is common in immunosuppressed patients (>95% seropositive) Rarely causes significant disease PTLD is an important complication / poor outcome (50% mortality) Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (allogeneic): 1 to 25% in high risk HSCT (unrelated/mismatch/ Tdepletion / cord blood T/ serology mismatch) Prospective monitoring of EBV DNA-emia (Qt) is recommended for High-risk allo HSCT to allow pre-emptive treatment: rituximab, reduction of immunosuppression (treatment efficacy) Solid Organ Transplantation: European Conference on Infection in Leukemia dec. 2009 Adult: 1.0% (kidney) to 20% (small bowel) insufficient data to recommend surveillance Children: 1.2% (kidney) to 30% (small bowel) children children at risk of primary infection routine surveillance is likely to aid British Committee for Standards in Haematology october 2009 UK NEQAS EBV DNA quantification pilot distribution 3

INTRODUCTION-3 When to start prevention of PTLD? European recommendations for HSCT: European Conference on Infection in Leukemia dec. 2009 Indication of pre-emptive therapy: when EBV DNA-emia is high or rising whole blood/plasma/serum Weekly for - / > weekly for + / 3 months or more (earlier+) UK guidelines for SOT, BJH 2010, 149: 675-692- (BCSH & SBTS joint working group) UK NEQAS EBV DNA quantification pilot distribution 4

QUESTIONNAIRE / april 2009 Sent to CMV DNA quantification scheme participants 78.8% use molecular methods to quantify EBV DNA (all real time PCR) Matrix: 62.5% use whole blood 54.2% use plasma 16.6% use both Median detection limit: 250c/mL [10-2000] (all using c/ml) Median number of samples examined per week: 22.5 [0.5-200] Patient types: 68.8% for HSCT / 36.8% for SOT / 7.9% for tumor Clinical cut-off: viral load rise over a definite period of time & confirm high viral load UK NEQAS EBV DNA quantification pilot distribution 5

Pilot /Specimen design A Namalwa/mL 78,000 Expected VL c/ml Log 156,000 5.19 Pre-distribution Artus Homogeneity c/ml Log SD 102300 5.01 0.118 B 7,800 15,600 4.19 31600 4.50 0.149 Log diff. 1.00 Log diff. 0.49 (Qiagen column) (20 vials) A total of 88 sets of specimens were distributed with 74 participants returning results, 13 participants did not examine the specimens 61 sets of results UK NEQAS EBV DNA quantification pilot distribution 6

Log (copies/ml) Pilot / Results by specimen SPECIMEN A expected/ml 5.19 log (156,000) median+/-sd 5.01 +/- 0.57 range 3.00-6.84 SPECIMEN B expected/ml 4.19 log (15,600) median+/-sd 4.02 +/- 0.47 range 3.05-5.49 8.00 8.00 7.00 7.00 6.00 6.00 5.00 median 5.00 4.00 4.00 median 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 61 results sorted in increasing order UK NEQAS EBV DNA quantification pilot distribution 7

Log (copies/ml) Pilot / Results by laboratory Specimen A Specimen B 8.00 8.00 7.00 7.00 6.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 Specimen-A results sorted in increasing order Specimen-B results sorted in increasing order UK NEQAS EBV DNA quantification pilot distribution 8

Argene Biosoft Argene Biosoft Other PCR: Single target Real-Time Multiplex Roche: LightCycler Roche: LightCycler Sacace Real-TM Unspecified Log (copies/ml) unknown LMP BXF-1 EBNA-1 unknown EBNA-1 variable LMP-2 Pilot / Results by amplification methods 7.00 6.50 6.00 5.50 5.00 4.50 4.00 3.50 3.00 median Median 5.10+/-0.582 [4.38-6.84] Median 4.84+/-0.351 [3.67-5.40] Inter-laboratory variations: same amplification assay Median 5.27+/-0.509 [4.15-6.15] different amplification platforms different extraction assays UK NEQAS EBV DNA quantification pilot distribution 9

Pilot / Extraction and amplification methods Amplification method n % 21 34.4% 17 27.9% 14 23.0% Roche: LightCycler 2 3.3% Argene Biosoft 2 3.3% PCR: Single target 1 1.6% Real Time Multiplex 1 1.6% Sacace Real-TM 1 1.6% Unspecified 1 1.6% Other 1 1.6% >23 combinations of extraction and amplification assays for 61 sets of results 5 most frequent combinations: 26.2% in house assays Extraction method Amplification method n % NucliSENS easymag 11 18.0 Qiagen* 11 18.0 Qiagen* 6 9.8 NucliSENS easymag 5 8.2 MagnaPure 4 6.6 73.8% commercial assays: no automation / all use IC All open systems: free choice of extraction methods: Extraction method n % Qiagen* 24 36.9% NucliSENS easymag 19 29.2% MagnaPure 9 13.8% Magnetic beads 2 3.1% Nucleo Spin 1 1.5% Unspecified 3 4.6% Other 3 4.6% * BioRobot MDx QIAsymphony UK NEQAS EBV DNA quantification pilot distribution 10

Log (copies/ml) Pilot / Results for the 5 most frequent E&A assay combinations-1 7.50 Specimen-A Median Max/Min Specimen-B Median Max/Min 6.50 5.50 4.50 3.50 2.50 In-house Extraction Amplification NucliSENS easymag NanogenAD: Real-Time Alert Qiagen* Qiagen* NanogenAD: Real-Time Alert NucliSENS easymag MagnaPure n (%) Median A +/- SD Median B +/- SD 11 (18%) 4.83 +/- 0.194 3.86 +/- 0.168 11 (18%) 5.19 +/- 0.397 4.15 +/- 0.383 6 (9.8%) 5.06 +/- 0.624 4.15 +/- 0.660 5 (8.2%) 5.28 +/- 0.111 4.25 +/- 0.202 4 (6.6%) 5.09 +/- 0.991 4.12 +/- 0.827 *BioRobot MDx, QIAsymphony UK NEQAS EBV DNA quantification pilot distribution 11

Log (copies/ml) Pilot / Results for the 5 most frequent E&A assay combinations-2 7.50 Specimen-A Median Max/Min Specimen-B Median Max/Min 6.50 5.50 4.50 3.50 2.50 Extraction Amplification NucliSENS easymag NanogenAD: Real-Time Alert Qiagen* Qiagen* NanogenAD: Real-Time Alert NucliSENS easymag MagnaPure n (%) Median A +/- SD Median B +/- SD 11 (18%) 4.83 +/- 0.194 3.86 +/- 0.168 11 (18%) 5.19 +/- 0.397 4.15 +/- 0.383 5 (8.2%) 5.08 +/- 0.250 4.21 +/- 0.455 5 (8.2%) 5.28 +/- 0.111 4.25 +/- 0.202 3 (4.9%) 4.94 +/- 0.318 3.94 +/- 0.359 *BioRobot MDx, QIAsymphony UK NEQAS EBV DNA quantification pilot distribution 12

Conclusion This pilot study illustrates the lack of standardisation, with participants results ranging 3.84 log for specimen A (4 log) and 2.44 log for specimen B (5 log) using 5 different commercial assays and in house assays: all assays are manual/semi-manual offering free choices of extraction and amplification platforms: variations of 2 log and more within same amplification assay Standardisation: Matrix Extraction assay Amplification platform Amplification/detection assay Needed to establish guidelines for the surveillance of HSCT and SOT at risk of developing PTLD: clinical cut-off for pre-emptive therapy Frequency of assessment (+) Treatment efficacy UK NEQAS EBV DNA quantification pilot distribution 13

IU/mL Copies/mL 2001 First WHO international HBV DNA 2010 First WHO international CMV DNA 100000 90000 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 median 17,000 IU/mL Laboratories (n=109) 100000 12/2008- serum 05/2010-plasma 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 median 26,000 c/ml 30000 20000 10000 0 Laboratories (n=81) median+/-0.2log: 81% median+/-0.2log: 41% 90000 UK NEQAS EBV DNA quantification pilot distribution 14

Log A - Log B Pilot / Results currently analysed as a log difference 98.4% (60/61) detected 5 log of EBV DNA (specimen A) 93.4% (57/61) detected 4 log of EBV DNA (specimen B) -> 57 log differences calculated: expected 1.00 log median+/-sd 0.96+/-0.21 range 0.05-1.49 96.5% (55/57) reported a 0.46 to 1.46 log difference 1.96 1.46 0.96 median 0.46-0.04 UK NEQAS EBV DNA quantification pilot distribution 15