REDUCING DEPLOYMENT TIME WITH DELL CHASSIS MANAGEMENT CONTROLLER

Similar documents
How To Compare Two Servers For A Test On A Poweredge R710 And Poweredge G5P (Poweredge) (Power Edge) (Dell) Poweredge Poweredge And Powerpowerpoweredge (Powerpower) G5I (

RESOLVING SERVER PROBLEMS WITH DELL PROSUPPORT PLUS AND SUPPORTASSIST AUTOMATED MONITORING AND RESPONSE

TEST REPORT Dell PERC H700 average percentage win in IOPS over FEBRUARY 2006 Dell PERC 6/i across RAID 5 and RAID 10. Internal HDD tests

Figure 2: Dell offers significant savings per chassis over HP and IBM in acquisition costs and 1-, 3-, and 5-year TCO.

VIRTUALIZATION-MANAGEMENT COMPARISON: DELL FOGLIGHT FOR VIRTUALIZATION VS. SOLARWINDS VIRTUALIZATION MANAGER

IMPROVE YOUR SUPPORT EXPERIENCE WITH DELL PREMIUM SUPPORT WITH SUPPORTASSIST TECHNOLOGY

SERVER POWER CALCULATOR ANALYSIS: CISCO UCS POWER CALCULATOR AND HP POWER ADVISOR

MANAGING CLIENTS WITH DELL CLIENT INTEGRATION PACK 3.0 AND MICROSOFT SYSTEM CENTER CONFIGURATION MANAGER 2012

How To Perform A File Server On A Poweredge R730Xd With Windows Storage Spaces

TOTAL COST COMPARISON SUMMARY: VMWARE VSPHERE VS. MICROSOFT HYPER-V

FASTER AND MORE EFFICIENT SYSTEM MANAGEMENT WITH LENOVO XCLARITY ADMINISTRATOR

A QUICK AND EASY GUIDE TO SETTING UP THE DELL POWEREDGE C8000

A PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES TEST REPORT WORKSTATION PRODUCTIVITY WITH THE DUAL-PROCESSOR LENOVO THINKSTATION D20 AUGUST 2011

CENTRALIZED SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT: DELL LIFECYCLE CONTROLLER INTEGRATION FOR SCCM VS. HP PROLIANT INTEGRATION KIT FOR SCCM

A Principled Technologies white paper commissioned by Dell Inc.

DELL POWEREDGE M420: A MICROSOFT SQL SERVER 2012 ALWAYSON FAILOVER CLUSTER REFERENCE ARCHITECTURE

ALIENWARE X51 PERFORMANCE COMPARISON: SAMSUNG SSD VS. TRADITIONAL HARD DRIVE

A Principled Technologies deployment guide commissioned by Dell Inc.

COMPLEXITY COMPARISON: CISCO UCS VS. HP VIRTUAL CONNECT

Out-of-box comparison between Dell and HP blade servers

A PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES TEST REPORT SHAREPOINT PERFORMANCE: TREND MICRO PORTALPROTECT VS. MICROSOFT FOREFRONT JULY 2011

Figure 1A: Dell server and accessories Figure 1B: HP server and accessories Figure 1C: IBM server and accessories

Out-of-box comparison between Dell, HP, and IBM blade servers

DATABASE PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF VMWARE VCLOUD AIR, AMAZON WEB SERVICES, AND MICROSOFT AZURE

I/O PERFORMANCE OF THE LENOVO STORAGE N4610

LOAD BALANCING IN THE MODERN DATA CENTER WITH BARRACUDA LOAD BALANCER FDC T740

MANAGE INFRASTRUCTURE AND DEPLOY SERVICES WITH EASE USING DELL ACTIVE SYSTEM MANAGER

WEB SERVER PERFORMANCE: DELL SERVERS

TEST REPORT OCTOBER 2009 SMB Workload performance testing: PowerEdge T110 vs. an older small business desktop running typical small

A PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES TEST REPORT VIDEO-RENDERING PERFORMANCE COMPARISON: DELL PRECISION MOBILE WORKSTATIONS VS. APPLE MACBOOK PROS MARCH 2012

Building Microsoft Windows Server 2012 Clusters on the Dell PowerEdge VRTX

I/O PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF VMWARE VCLOUD HYBRID SERVICE AND AMAZON WEB SERVICES

COMPLEXITY AND COST COMPARISON: CISCO UCS VS. IBM FLEX SYSTEM (REVISED)

BETTER PUBLIC CLOUD PERFORMANCE WITH SOFTLAYER

Power Efficiency Comparison: Cisco UCS 5108 Blade Server Chassis and Dell PowerEdge M1000e Blade Enclosure

Summary. Key results at a glance:

VERITAS NETBACKUP 7.6 BENCHMARK COMPARISON: DATA PROTECTION IN A LARGE-SCALE VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT (PART 3)

CUTTING-EDGE SOLUTIONS FOR TODAY AND TOMORROW. Dell PowerEdge M-Series Blade Servers

Adaptec: Snap Server NAS Performance Study

Adaptec: Snap Server NAS Performance Study

SYMANTEC NETBACKUP 7.6 BENCHMARK COMPARISON: DATA PROTECTION IN A LARGE-SCALE VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT (PART 1)

TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP: DELL LATITUDE E6510 VS. APPLE 15-INCH MACBOOK PRO

HP ProLiant BL660c Gen9 and Microsoft SQL Server 2014 technical brief

Dell Server Management Pack Suite Version 6.0 for Microsoft System Center Operations Manager User's Guide

SYMANTEC NETBACKUP 7.6 BENCHMARK COMPARISON: DATA PROTECTION IN A LARGE-SCALE VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT (PART 2)

CLOUD NETWORKING WITH CA 3TERA APPLOGIC

CONSOLIDATING SQL SERVER 2000 ONTO DELL POWEREDGE R900 AND POWEREDGE R905 USING MICROSOFT S HYPER-V

Evaluation of Dell PowerEdge VRTX Shared PERC8 in Failover Scenario

CONSOLIDATING SERVERS WITH THE DELL POWEREDGE R720 RUNNING MICROSOFT WINDOWS SERVER 2012 AND MICROSOFT SQL SERVER 2012

Digi International: Digi One IA RealPort Latency Performance Testing

A PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES TEST REPORT EXCHANGE PERFORMANCE: TREND MICRO SCANMAIL SUITE VS. MICROSOFT FOREFRONT SEPTEMBER 2011

HP recommended configurations for Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 and HP ProLiant Gen8 with direct attached storage (DAS)

MICROSOFT SHAREPOINT CONSOLIDATION AND TCO: DELL POWEREDGE R720 VS. HP PROLIANT DL380 G7

Manage Dell Hardware in a Virtual Environment Using OpenManage Integration for VMware vcenter

Comtrol Corporation: Latency Performance Testing of Network Device Servers

A PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES TEST REPORT WORKSTATION PRODUCTIVITY WITH THE DUAL-PROCESSOR LENOVO THINKSTATION D20 USING CATIA V6 OCTOBER 2011

Dell PowerEdge Blades Outperform Cisco UCS in East-West Network Performance

IMPROVING PERFORMANCE WITH IN-MEMORY SQL SERVER 2014 DATABASE FEATURES ON THE DELL POWEREDGE R930

Power Efficiency Comparison: Cisco UCS 5108 Blade Server Chassis and IBM FlexSystem Enterprise Chassis

Optimizing SQL Server Storage Performance with the PowerEdge R720

CPU PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF TWO CLOUD SOLUTIONS: VMWARE VCLOUD HYBRID SERVICE AND MICROSOFT AZURE

VERITAS Software - Storage Foundation for Windows Dynamic Multi-Pathing Performance Testing

HP Server Management Packs for Microsoft System Center Essentials User Guide

VIRTUALIZED STORAGE IN CA APPLOGIC

Dell Virtual Remote Desktop Reference Architecture. Technical White Paper Version 1.0

DELL. Unified Server Configurator: IT and Systems Management Overview. A Dell Technical White Paper

Private cloud computing advances

JUNE 2009 File server performance comparison of three Dell PowerVault NX3000 configurations using Microsoft FSCT

HP recommended configuration for Microsoft Exchange Server 2010: HP LeftHand P4000 SAN

Microsoft Windows Server 2003 vs. Linux Competitive File Server Performance Comparison

Best Practices for Installing and Configuring the Hyper-V Role on the LSI CTS2600 Storage System for Windows 2008

Boosting Data Transfer with TCP Offload Engine Technology

Using EonStor FC-host Storage Systems in VMware Infrastructure 3 and vsphere 4

Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010

CLOUD COMPARISON: MICROSOFT PRIVATE CLOUD ON THE INTEL- POWERED DELL SOLUTION VS. A LEADING PUBLIC CLOUD PROVIDER

SERVERS: MAKING THE 32-BIT TO 64-BIT TRANSITION

How To Write An Article On An Hp Appsystem For Spera Hana

Upgrade to Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 on Dell PowerEdge Servers Abstract

Dell FlexAddress for PowerEdge M-Series Blades

Cisco UCS B-Series M2 Blade Servers

BROWSING WEBSITES WITH THE ASUS ZENPAD S 8.0

Lifecycle Controller Platform Update/Firmware Update in Dell PowerEdge 12th Generation Servers

CONSOLIDATING SQL SERVER 2005 ONTO DELL POWEREDGE R900 AND POWEREDGE R905 USING MICROSOFT S HYPER-V

Feature Comparison: idrac 7 & 8 and idrac8 License Chart

Intel Data Direct I/O Technology (Intel DDIO): A Primer >

Fujitsu PRIMERGY BX920 S2 Dual-Socket Server

Dell Virtualization Solution for Microsoft SQL Server 2012 using PowerEdge R820

Dell idrac7 with Lifecycle Controller

DATABASE PERFORMANCE: DELL SERVERS

Installation and Configuration Guide for Cluster Services running on Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server using Acer Altos Servers

BACK UP DEDUPLICATED DATA IN LESS TIME WITH THE DELL DR6000 DISK BACKUP APPLIANCE

Virtualized Exchange 2007 Local Continuous Replication

FILE-HOSTING SERVICE COMPARISON: FASTER SYNCING WITH DROPBOX FOR BUSINESS

SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT SAVINGS WITH DELL OPENMANAGE ON 13G DELL POWEREDGE SERVERS

Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010

Dragon NaturallySpeaking and citrix. A White Paper from Nuance Communications March 2009

Unified Computing Systems

FLOW-3D Performance Benchmark and Profiling. September 2012

The Advantages of Multi-Port Network Adapters in an SWsoft Virtual Environment

Dell Server Management Pack Suite Version For Microsoft System Center Operations Manager And System Center Essentials User s Guide

Transcription:

REDUCING DEPLOYMENT TIME WITH DELL CHASSIS MANAGEMENT CONTROLLER Today s blade server technologies, like those in the Dell PowerEdge M1000e, are designed to handle a broad range of workloads, from large virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) implementations, to wide-reaching enterprise resource planning (ERP) solutions, to customer relationship management (CRM) programs. These demanding applications require more and more server nodes as your business grows. In the past, this meant administrators had to spend long hours researching and configuring hardware settings to provide the best performing configuration for each blade. This process was not only time-consuming, which hurt your bottom line, but also had the potential to introduce errors and misconfigurations, which could prolong mitigation efforts and negatively affect application availability. Blade technologies not only provide a self-contained hardware environment for housing multiple server nodes, but they address the server deployment issue with purpose-built software that acts as a single management pane for integrated control of these dedicated environments. The embedded chassis management firmware can significantly reduce the time and effort required to add more server nodes to the environment. Instead of repeatedly and manually duplicating the hardware configurations for each server, administrators can now use automation technologies to quickly and cleanly add new nodes. JULY 2013 A PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES TEST REPORT Commissioned by Dell Inc.

In the Principled Technologies labs, we created a representative blade infrastructure to see how well the Dell PowerEdge M1000e with the Dell Chassis Management met these challenges. The Dell Chassis Management 4.45 provides administrators with the ability to capture all the settings within a server profile and replicate those settings to other identical servers within the chassis. We first deployed a Dell PowerEdge M620 blade server manually to demonstrate hands-on configuration changes to individual servers without the newest time saving technologies from Dell. We then repeated the blade deployment, this time replicating configuration settings with the Dell PowerEdge M1000e Chassis Management. Our test results showed the Dell Chassis Management dramatically reduced the amount of time and number of steps required to deploy a new environment compared to the manual method. In a full 16-blade chassis, our results show that an administrator could save over an hour and a half of tedious and error-prone manual setup time. Defining the settings for a single server, capturing the server profile, and replicating the profile using the Dell Chassis Management required only 59 steps instead of 800 repetitive manual steps. The Dell Chassis Management server profile capture and replication feature needs only nine steps to deploy server configuration settings to the entire chassis population. Furthermore, the Quick Deploy feature of Dell Chassis Management enable administrators to provision empty chassis slots with pre-built hardware profiles, allowing rapid deployment of additional hardware to meet the demands of a growing environment. Administrators can also export server profiles and import them to additional Dell PowerEdge M1000e blade enclosures, further reducing blade-server deployment times. In addition to saving time and reducing complexity, Dell Chassis Management automation capabilities can minimize misconfigurations due to human error, reduce recovery time, and free administrators to perform other critical work in your organization. As this environment grows, your administrators will have more time to attend to other customer-oriented and high-value tasks such as application maintenance, systems management, infrastructure monitoring, and issue resolution. AUTOMATING DEPLOYMENT WITH DELL POWEREDGE M1000E CHASSIS MANAGEMENT CONTROLLER Large-scale enterprise applications, such as Citrix XenDesktop, can be configured to distribute computing workloads across a large number of identically configured servers for high availability, redundancy, and scalability. Rather than deploying these workloads on individual rack-servers, each with its own management software, network and storage cabling, power supplies, and physical footprint, many organizations opt for blade enclosures, such as the Dell PowerEdge M1000e. Blade A Principled Technologies test report 2

server administrators benefit from a single chassis management interface, consolidated power, reduced cabling, and a smaller footprint which readily meet the needs of their distributed workloads. Before using the application in our testing, we consulted a Citrix XenDesktop best practices guide to determine beneficial BIOS or device configuration settings and added idrac SNMP parameters for an enterprise monitoring and management tool, such as Dell OpenManage Essentials (OME). We then captured the amount of time and the number of steps required to perform those modifications to a Dell PowerEdge M620 blade server housed within a Dell PowerEdge M1000e blade enclosure. In our tests, we found that deploying a single Dell PowerEdge M620 blade server with the recommended BIOS and idrac settings required 6 minutes 30 seconds and 50 steps. Extrapolating that data, it would require 1 hour 44 minutes and 800 steps to manually configure and deploy identical settings on sixteen Dell PowerEdge M620 blades within a fully populated Dell PowerEdge M1000e blade enclosure. It is easy to see how manual deployment of identical nodes with specific settings is time consuming, especially when considering a Dell PowerEdge M1000e blade enclosure could house up to 32 Dell PowerEdge M420 blade servers. The Dell PowerEdge M1000e Chassis Management meets administrators deployment and maintenance configuration needs with automated server replication using XML-based profiles. The Dell Chassis Management automates the process of deploying a full chassis, requiring only nine steps beyond the initial manual process of configuring a single blade. As Figure 1 shows, using Dell Chassis Management reduced fullchassis deployment times by as much as 92.3 percent in 741 fewer steps than manually configuring an entire chassis. This process creates a single master profile, so deployment of an entire chassis occurs in less than eight minutes. This saves more than an hour and a half compared to manual configuration of the chassis. In the time saved, an administrator could deploy and completely configure a Dell PowerEdge VRTX solution in a remote office, 1 with time to spare. 1 www.principledtechnologies.com/dell/poweredge_vrtx_configuration_0513.pdf A Principled Technologies test report 3

Number of steps Time, in hours:minutes:seconds Steps and time to deploy a full blade chassis Figure 1: Using the Dell Chassis Management reduced the number of steps and time required to deploy a full 16-blade chassis. 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 800 59 1:44:00 0:07:58 1:55:12 1:40:48 1:26:24 1:12:00 0:57:36 0:43:12 0:28:48 0:14:24 0 Manual Dell CMC Manual Dell CMC 0:00:00 Steps Time Appendix B details the steps and times it took to complete each deployment. Expanding an existing environment Organizations deploy distributed enterprise applications to benefit from higher levels of availability, redundancy, and scalability. The ability to grow without disruptions increases productivity by reducing downtime and the costs associated with system outages. One of the challenges of expanding an existing environment is ensuring configuration parameters are identical within a given hosting infrastructure. The Dell Chassis Management Quick Deploy feature allows an administrator to assign a completed profile to an empty slot within a chassis. Scaling this environment to meet new demands is as simple as obtaining an additional blade and inserting it into a slot with a pre-assigned profile. Immediately following insertion, the LCD panel on the front of the chassis prompts an administrator to accept the Quick Deploy profile assigned to the slot. If the administrator accepts the offer, the profile settings are automatically applied, and the server is ready for operating system installation. In larger enterprise environments, distributed computing resources may exceed the capacity of a single chassis. In such cases, the Dell Chassis Management allows administrators to build once, capture a system profile, and export the complete XML profile to a management workstation or network share. Administrators can then import the saved profiles to other chassis, and apply those profiles to any compatible hardware contained in them. In our tests, exporting a capture profile from the Dell Chassis Management took only five seconds. Importing to an additional chassis required 18 seconds. A Principled Technologies test report 4

Quick return to service Consider a scenario in which you must add five full chassis of Dell PowerEdge M620 blade servers to your environment in order to provide for a sudden growth in service demands such as an enterprise-wide rollout of virtual desktops. Manually configuring each server node in those chassis would require 8 hours and 40 minutes of administrative time, with 80 distinct instances where human error could lead to misconfiguration and operational inconsistencies. Compare that scenario to one in which you use the profile management features of the Dell Chassis Management to capture a known good profile, import that server profile into the five new chassis, and then deploy that profile to every blade in each chassis. In only 6 minutes and 19 seconds you can deploy 80 blade servers with the identical configuration. That is a 98.8 percent reduction for time required to deploy the same infrastructure saving more than a day s work. Your technical staff could use that valuable time to deploy additional infrastructure, attend to remote office systems management, perform infrastructure monitoring and maintenance, and assist in issue resolution and customer support. With median times to resolve all helpdesk tickets in the four to nine hour range, 2 3 the time saved in deploying new infrastructure can mean additional workers available for proactive measures or faster issue response, which enhances customer relationships. The improved IT metrics highlight your organizations competitive advantages. See Appendix B for a detailed explanation on how to export capture profiles and import profiles to other Dell PowerEdge M1000e Chassis. Returning to service after an outage can be a challenge when replacing servers with new hardware. An administrator would have to remove a functioning server from service to capture the correct configuration settings to use when setting up the replacement hardware. This can lead to downtime and all the associated costs, 4 especially if the only available source is a sole remaining member of a cluster. Additionally, if the administrator misses a setting, the new hardware configuration will introduce inconsistencies in the environment that could contribute to performance degradation and require additional scheduled downtime to correct. The Dell Chassis Management server profile capture and replication functions can significantly reduce the challenges associated with replacement hardware configuration. Using the Quick Deploy features to assign a known good profile to a slot lifts the burden of configuration discovery from busy administrators and decreases the 2 http://www.hdiconnect.com/boards/081413/18467.aspx 3 http://www.thinkhdi.com/~/media/hdicorp/files/library-archive/insider%20articles/mean-time-toresolve.pdf?utm_content=091212_industryinsider 4 www.nasi.com/downtime_cost.php A Principled Technologies test report 5

likelihood of inconsistencies in production environments. The Dell Chassis Management can capture profiles from a server while it remains in service; this eliminates further downtime caused by shutting down that last remaining cluster member simply to capture configuration settings. WHAT WE TESTED About the Dell PowerEdge M1000e blade enclosure The Dell PowerEdge M1000e blade chassis and its supported fabric interconnects are designed for dense computing situations. Features of the PowerEdge M1000e include the following: Management. Reduces administrative demand using the Dell Chassis Management - secure centralized management interface for the chassis and blades within, using proven Web (SSL-encrypted) and CLI (SSH/Telnet) technologies. The Dell Chassis Management can capture all the settings of a server profile and replicate those settings to other identical servers within the chassis. Flexible I/O. Six interconnect sockets with the capability to support three fully redundant fabrics, a passive midplane with more than 8 Tbps in I/O bandwidth capacity, and FlexIO support provide a number of connectivity options for your servers. Reliability and efficiency. Six power supplies and nine fans, all hot-swappable, allowing for no-downtime maintenance of key chassis components. All components are tuned for maximum power efficiency to reduce datacenter power consumption. For more information about the Dell PowerEdge M1000e Blade Enclosure, visit www.dell.com/us/enterprise/p/poweredge-m1000e/pd. About the Dell PowerEdge M620 blade server The Dell PowerEdge M620 has features optimized for performance, density, and energy efficiency. Processors. The Dell PowerEdge M620 is powered by two Intel Xeon E5-2600- series processors, which incorporate the very latest in processor technology from Intel. The powerful processors provide the performance you need for your essential mainstream tasks. The Intel Xeon E5-2600-series processor gives you up to eight cores per processor or up to 16 cores per server. Memory. The Dell PowerEdge M620 holds up to 768GB DDR3 RAM (up to 1600 MHz) across 24 DIMM slots per server node. A Principled Technologies test report 6

Management. The Dell PowerEdge M620, like all late-model Dell servers, comes with the Dell Lifecycle. This tool simplifies server management by providing a single interface for management functions and by storing critical system information in the system itself. There are no CDs or USB keys to monitor for drivers or firmware. For full details on the hardware we tested, see Appendix A. For detailed steps on how we tested, both manually and with Dell Chassis Management, see Appendix B. See Appendix C for details on the specific changes we made to the Dell PowerEdge M620 BIOS, idrac, and device settings. IN CONCLUSION Implementing and managing large and distributed enterprise solutions presents unique administrative challenges. Anything that can streamline the process to minimize error and save administrator time and effort can have a strong, positive effect on your company s bottom line. We found that the Dell Chassis Management made deploying Dell PowerEdge M620 blades in a Dell PowerEdge M1000e chassis much quicker and easier by allowing you to import existing server profiles in just a few clicks. In our test case to configure for a common mission critical application, Citrix XenDesktop, manually deploying a full 16-blade chassis required 800 steps; but only 59 steps with Dell Chassis Management, transforming a multi-hour task to one that took just minutes. Certain demanding applications can require even greater hardware configuration these would benefit even more from the all settings profile capture and replication features of the Dell Chassis Management. The ability to pre-provision empty slots and export profiles for redeployment on other chassis further increases the value of the Dell Chassis Management in bigger environments by largely eliminating tedious, redundant tasks and decreasing the opportunities for human error, while freeing administrators to perform other missioncritical or innovative activities. Choosing a solution that automates much of the deployment process is an asset to managing your infrastructure and your business. A Principled Technologies test report 7

APPENDIX A SYSTEM CONFIGURATION INFORMATION Figures 2 and 3 provide detailed configuration information for the hardware we used in our tests. System Dell PowerEdge M1000e blade enclosure Power supplies Number of power supplies 6 Dell E2700P-00 Wattage of each (W) 2,700 Cooling fans Total number of fans 9 Dell YK776 Rev. X50 Dimensions (h x w) of each 3.1" x 3.5" Volts 12 Amps 7 Midplane Chassis midplane 1.0 Chassis firmware Chassis Management firmware 4.45.A00.201307240137 ikvm firmware 01.00.01.01 IOM firmware 12 IOM software 4.2.2.3 I/O modules Switch Dell M8024-k 10GbE Occupied bay B1, B2 Management modules Chassis Management slot 1 Chassis Management Hardware X28 ikvm slot Avocent ikvm Switch (OPR005) Hardware X06 Chassis Management slot 2 N/A Figure 2: Configuration information for the blade enclosure. A Principled Technologies test report 8

System Dell PowerEdge M620 blade server General Number of processor packages 2 Number of cores per processor 8 Number of hardware threads per core 2 System power management policy Custom (see Appendix B) CPU Vendor Intel Name Xeon Model number E5-2660 Stepping C2 Socket type FCLGA2011 Core frequency (GHz) 2.2 Bus frequency (GHz) 8.0 L1 cache 32 KB (per core) L2 cache 256 KB (per core) L3 cache 20 MB Platform Dell PowerEdge M620 Motherboard model number 0VHRN7A03 BIOS name and version 1.7.6 BIOS settings Custom (see Appendix B) Memory module(s) Total RAM in system (GB) 256 Hynix Semiconductor HMT42GR7MFR4C-PB Type PC3-12800 Speed (MHz) 1,600 Speed running in the system (MHz) 1,600 Timing/Latency (tcl-trcd-trp-trasmin) 11-11-11-35 Size (GB) 16 Number of RAM module(s) 16 Chip organization Double-sided Rank Dual Graphics Matrox G200eR2 Graphics memory (MB) 16 RAID controller Dell PERC H310 Embedded Firmware version 20.12.0-0004 Cache size (MB) 0 Hard drive Hitachi HUC151414CSS600 Number of disks in system 2 A Principled Technologies test report 9

System Dell PowerEdge M620 blade server Size (GB) 147 Buffer size (MB) 64 RPM 15k Type SAS 6Gb/s Ethernet adapters 2 x Broadcom BCM57810 NetXtreme II 10 GigE Type LOM 2 x Broadcom BCM57810 NetXtreme II 10 GigE Type Mezzanine - BRCM 10GbE 2P 57810S-k USB ports Number 2 external Type 2.0 Firmware Integrated Dell Remote Access 1.40.40 Broadcom NetXtreme II 10 Gb Ethernet BCM57810 7.6.15 BIOS 1.7.6 Lifecycle, 1.1.5.165, A00 1.1.5.165 Enterprise UEFI Diagnostics 4223A3 OS Drivers Pack 7.3.0.16 System CPLD 1.0.6 PERC H310 Mini 20.12.0-0004 Physical Disk 0:1:0 K516 Physical Disk 0:1:1 K516 BP12G+ 0:1 1 Figure 3: Configuration information for the blade server we used in our tests. A Principled Technologies test report 10

APPENDIX B - HOW WE TESTED In each section, we show the time it took to complete each set of steps in parentheses at the end of each heading. Deploying blade servers (manual steps) Complete steps 1 through 50 below to deploy a blade manually. For a manual chassis deployment, complete these steps 16 times. For deployment with Dell Chassis Management, complete these steps once, and continue to the next section for instructions on how to automate the process for the rest of the chassis. Configuring single blade hardware and BIOS (6 minutes, 30 seconds) 1. Boot the blade server. 2. Press F2 to enter System Setup. 3. Select System BIOS. 4. Select Processor settings. 5. Set Virtualization Technology: Enabled. Click Back. 6. Select System Profile Settings. 7. Set System Profile: Custom. 8. Set CPU Power Management: Maximum Performance. 9. Set Memory Frequency: Maximum Performance. 10. Set Turbo Boost: Disabled. 11. Set CIE: Disabled. 12. Set C States: Disabled. 13. Set Collaborative CPU Performance Control: Disabled. Click Back. 14. Click Finish. Click Yes to accept changes. Click OK to confirm Success. 15. Select Device Settings. 16. Select Integrated NIC1 Port 1. 17. Set Virtualization Mode: NPAR. 18. Select NIC Partitioning Configuration Menu. 19. Select Partition 1. 20. Set iscsi Offload Protocol: Disabled. Click Back. 21. Select Partition 2. 22. Set iscsi Offload Protocol: Disabled. Click Back. 23. Select Partition 3. 24. Set iscsi Offload Protocol: Disabled. Click Back. 25. Select Partition 4. 26. iscsi Offload Protocol: Enabled. Click Back. 27. Click Finish. Click Yes to accept changes. Click OK to confirm Success. 28. Select Integrated NIC Port 2. 29. Set Virtualization Mode: NPAR. 30. Select NIC Partitioning Configuration Menu. 31. Select Partition 1. 32. Set iscsi Offload Protocol: Disabled. Click Back. 33. Select Partition 2. 34. Set iscsi Offload Protocol: Disabled. Click Back. 35. Select Partition 3. 36. Set iscsi Offload Protocol: Disabled. Click Back. 37. Select Partition 4. A Principled Technologies test report 11

38. Set iscsi Offload Protocol: Enabled. Click Back. 39. Click Finish. Click Yes to accept changes. Click OK to confirm Success. 40. Click Finish. 41. Select idrac Settings. 42. Select Network. 43. Set Enable IPMI over LAN: Enabled. Click Back. 44. Select Alerts. 45. Select Trap Settings. 46. Set IPv4 Destination List: Enabled. 47. Set Destination 1: 192.168.0.20. 48. Set Community String: <environment specific>. Click Back. 49. Click Finish. Click Yes to accept changes. Click OK to confirm Success. 50. Click Finish. Click Yes to confirm exit and reboot. Using Dell Chassis Management to automate the process for a full chassis Capturing a server profile (44 seconds) 1. Under Server Profiles, check the box beside the slot number containing the server profile to capture. 2. Click Save Profile. 3. In the Profiles on SD Card section, enter the name for the profile. 4. Click Save Profile. Upon completion, the profile will appear and is exportable. Deploying a saved profile to an existing chassis blade (44 seconds) 1. Under Server Profiles, check the boxes for the slots containing the target servers. 2. In the pull-down menu, choose the profile to deploy. 3. Click Apply Profile. 4. Click OK to confirm server reboot and apply profile. 5. Click OK to confirm Operation Successful. Information is sent to Lifecycle of target server. Exporting and importing profiles to another chassis Exporting a captured profile (5 seconds) 1. Under Profiles on SD Card, select the profile to export. 2. Click Export Profile. 3. Select Save File, and click OK. The file is downloaded to your local workstation, and saved in the default folder for downloads. Importing a saved profile (18 seconds) 1. Under Profiles on SD Card, click Import Profile. 2. Under Import server Profile, click Browse to locate the <filename>.xml profile you wish to import. 3. Click Import Profile. 4. Click OK to confirm Operation Successful. The profile will appear under Profiles on SD Card. A Principled Technologies test report 12

APPENDIX C CONFIGURATION SETTINGS Best Practice Guide BIOS Turbo Boost: Disabled Enhanced Intel Speedstep: Disabled Processor C State: Disabled Processor C3, C6, and C7 report: Disabled CPU Performance: enterprise Advanced->Intel Directed I/O->VT for Director IO: Enabled Advanced-> RAS Memory->Memory RAS Config : Maximum Performance NUMA: Enabled NIC traffic isolation MGMT VM_DATA VM_MOTION IP_STORAGE MGMT VM_DATA VM_MOTION IP_STORAGE idrac Dell PowerEdge M620 setting Turbo Boost: Disabled Collaborative CPU Performance Control: Disabled C States: Disabled CIE: Disabled System Profile: Custom CPU Power Management: Maximum Performance Virtualization Technology: Enabled Memory Frequency: Maximum Performance N/A Integrated NIC 1 Port 1 Virtualization Mode: NPAR Partition 1->iSCSI Offload Protocol: Disabled Partition 2->iSCSI Offload Protocol: Disabled Partition 3->iSCSI Offload Protocol: Disabled Partition 4->iSCSI Offload Protocol: Enabled Integrated NIC1 Port 2 Partition 1->iSCSI Offload Protocol: Disabled Partition 2->iSCSI Offload Protocol: Disabled Partition 3->iSCSI Offload Protocol: Disabled Partition 4->iSCSI Offload Protocol: Enabled Enable IPMI over LAN: Enabled Alerts->Trap Settings IPv4 Destination List: Enabled Destination 1: 192.168.0.20 Community String: public Figure 4: Blade configuration modifications. A Principled Technologies test report 13

ABOUT PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES Principled Technologies, Inc. 1007 Slater Road, Suite 300 Durham, NC, 27703 www.principledtechnologies.com We provide industry-leading technology assessment and fact-based marketing services. We bring to every assignment extensive experience with and expertise in all aspects of technology testing and analysis, from researching new technologies, to developing new methodologies, to testing with existing and new tools. When the assessment is complete, we know how to present the results to a broad range of target audiences. We provide our clients with the materials they need, from market-focused data to use in their own collateral to custom sales aids, such as test reports, performance assessments, and white papers. Every document reflects the results of our trusted independent analysis. We provide customized services that focus on our clients individual requirements. Whether the technology involves hardware, software, Web sites, or services, we offer the experience, expertise, and tools to help our clients assess how it will fare against its competition, its performance, its market readiness, and its quality and reliability. Our founders, Mark L. Van Name and Bill Catchings, have worked together in technology assessment for over 20 years. As journalists, they published over a thousand articles on a wide array of technology subjects. They created and led the Ziff-Davis Benchmark Operation, which developed such industry-standard benchmarks as Ziff Davis Media s Winstone and WebBench. They founded and led etesting Labs, and after the acquisition of that company by Lionbridge Technologies were the head and CTO of VeriTest. Principled Technologies is a registered trademark of Principled Technologies, Inc. All other product names are the trademarks of their respective owners. Disclaimer of Warranties; Limitation of Liability: PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. HAS MADE REASONABLE EFFORTS TO ENSURE THE ACCURACY AND VALIDITY OF ITS TESTING, HOWEVER, PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, RELATING TO THE TEST RESULTS AND ANALYSIS, THEIR ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS OR QUALITY, INCLUDING ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE. ALL PERSONS OR ENTITIES RELYING ON THE RESULTS OF ANY TESTING DO SO AT THEIR OWN RISK, AND AGREE THAT PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ITS EMPLOYEES AND ITS SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY WHATSOEVER FROM ANY CLAIM OF LOSS OR DAMAGE ON ACCOUNT OF ANY ALLEGED ERROR OR DEFECT IN ANY TESTING PROCEDURE OR RESULT. IN NO EVENT SHALL PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. BE LIABLE FOR INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES IN CONNECTION WITH ITS TESTING, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. IN NO EVENT SHALL PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. S LIABILITY, INCLUDING FOR DIRECT DAMAGES, EXCEED THE AMOUNTS PAID IN CONNECTION WITH PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. S TESTING. CUSTOMER S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDIES ARE AS SET FORTH HEREIN. A Principled Technologies test report 14