Textiles Industry. Environmental Guidelines for. Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency. Industry Description and Practices. Waste Characteristics

Similar documents
Iron and Steel Manufacturing

Coke Manufacturing. Industry Description and Practices. Waste Characteristics

Industry Description and Practices. Waste Characteristics

Nitrogenous Fertilizer Plants

Nitrogenous Fertilizer Plants

Brewery Wastewater: 2010 Water and Wastewater Conference Page 1

Removing Heavy Metals from Wastewater

1.3 Wastewater and Ambient Water Quality

Appendix D lists the Field Services Standard Operating Procedures. Appendix E lists the Biological Monitoring Standard Operating Procedures.

INTEGRATED POLLUTION REGULATIONS AT TEXTILE SECTOR

Terms Used in the following Tables 1 3

Synthetic Fabric vs. Natural Fabric

GUIDELINES FOR LEACHATE CONTROL

Environmental Technology March/April 1998


ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES IN THE RENDERING INDUSTRY. Gregory L. Sindt, P.E. Environmental Engineer Bolton and Menk, Inc.

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES

Chapter 14 Quiz. Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Environmental Management System Case Study: Textile Wet Processes

RULE DRY CLEANERS USING SOLVENT OTHER THAN PERCHLOROETHYLENE

POINT SOURCES OF POLLUTION: LOCAL EFFECTS AND IT S CONTROL Vol. I - Industrial Wastewater-Types, Amounts and Effects - Hanchang SHI

Advantages and Disadvantages of Low VOC Vegetable Based Metalworking Fluids

4.1 Dry Cleaning General 1,2

Wastewater Reuse. Typical treated wastewater is:

To meet our acceptance criteria, we may require you to partially treat your wastewater before it discharges to sewer.

Environmental Regulations & Best Management Practices CARPET CLEANING OPERATIONS. Carpet Cleaning Operations in the Capital Regional District

Unit 1. Physical, chemical and biological Characteristics of Wastewater

CENTRAL POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD Parivesh Bhawan, East Arjun Nagar Delhi

Industry Description and Practices

Dyes. Applications, Properties And Equipment

LCA EXPERIENCE IN THE FIELD OF RECYCLING OF PLASTICS FROM ELECTRONIC WASTE

Nu G Medical Waste System Technology (Pyrolysis / Thermal Decomposition)

Characterizing Beauty Salon Wastewater for the Purpose of Regulating Onsite Disposal Systems

Metal Ion + EDTA Metal EDTA Complex

FlyMe Environmental impact assessment MHI/ Page 1(6) 2 Description and assessment of the Production process

LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT ON COTTON AND VISCOSE FIBRES FOR TEXTILE PRODUCTION

INCINERATION PLANTS. Hazardous waste incineration Wastewater incineration Sewage sludge incineration. A Bayer and LANXESS company

F The following spent

WASTEWATER TREATMENT OBJECTIVES

Pharmaceuticals Manufacturing

Physical flow accounts: principles and general concepts

INCINERATION IN JAPAN

CRITERIA DOCUMENTATION VERIFICATION PRINTED PAPER (Commission Decision 2012/481/EU)

Use of water for washing

Remediation of VOC Contaminated Groundwater

Development of Advanced Wastewater Treatment and Reclamation System

Module 16: The Activated Sludge Process - Part II Instructor Guide Answer Key

Data and Trends. Environmental protection and Safety

MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY TREATING OILY WASTEWATER FOR REUSE

IMO Approved Tank Cleaning Chemicals

Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) Reporting (SARA Title III Section 313)

Provided below is a description of the processes generating wastewater in a poultry plant and a typical pretreatment and full treatment system.

Aluminum Manufacturing

Choosing an Effluent Treatment Plant

Carpet Maintenance Guidelines

Sewage and Wastewater Odor Control Dr. Giancarlo Riva, Ozono Elettronica Internazionale, Muggio, Italy

Application Form 2E. Facilities Which Do Not Discharge Process Wastewater

Self Assessment Exercise

Nutrient Removal at Wastewater Treatment Facilities. Nitrogen and Phosphorus. Gary M. Grey HydroQual, Inc X 7167

Experts Review of Aerobic Treatment Unit Operation and Maintenance. Bruce Lesikar Texas AgriLife Extension Service

Dyeing applications of Sulphur dyes

Here are some hazardous wastes commonly generated by the marina industry:

HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM REMOVAL FROM INDUSTRIAL WATSEWATER BY CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION METHOD

PROPAK AquaBio Complete Water Restoration Systems

Household Hazardous Wastes

The chemical components of detergents and their roles in the washing process

Removing Thallium from Industrial FGD Scrubber Water with Sorbster Adsorbent Media

Description of the Water Conserv II Facility

Fiber Analysis 2005, 2004, 2003, 2001, 1999 by David A. Katz. All rights reserved.

MALAYSIA S REQUIREMENTS ON INDUSTRIAL EFFLUENT TREATMENT SYSTEMS -The WEPA Workshop and Annual Meeting February 2013 Siem Reap, Combodiaby

Bioremediation of contaminated soil. Dr. Piyapawn Somsamak Department of Environmental Science Kasetsart University

WASTEWATER TREATMENT

MBJ Environmental Programmes

Bioremediation. Introduction

Oxivir Tb and Accelerated Hydrogen Peroxide (AHP) Frequently Asked Questions

Pulp and Paper Industry

BY-LAW CONCERNING DISCHARGES AT PURIFICATION WORKS ON THE TERRITORY OF THE URBAN AGGLOMERATION OF MONTRÉAL

Cambridge Wastewater Treatment Facility

Monitoring & Recording Hazardous & Non-Hazardous Waste

Birmingham City University / Students Union Aspects and Impacts Register. Waste. Impacts description

IFC ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES FOR HEALTH CARE FACILITIES Effective May 8, 2003 Page 1. Environmental and Social Guidelines for Health Care Facilities

Sludge Treatment Facility Stack Gas Monitoring Report February 2016

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF COURTENAY BYLAW NO A bylaw to amend Storm Sewer Bylaw No. 1402, 1986

Ecological Sustainability

Greening Our Future By Educating Tomorrow s Workforce. Module 2: Lean Manufacturing and the Environment

Hazardous Waste In New Zealand

NimkarTek Technical Services Pvt Ltd

Managing Floor Drains and Flammable Traps

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE RAPID EIA STUDY FOR SHIVKAR LIGNITE BLOCK, DIST. BARMER, RAJASTHAN

EL724. Biodegradable Resin Products [EL /2/ ]

Nine Industrial Scale V SEPs. Feed Tank V SEP. Feed Pumps (Three) Concentrate. Tank. V SEP Treatment System

ENVIRONMENTAL BEST PRACTICE IN DYEING AND FINISHING OF TENCEL AND LENZING MODAL

NEW JERSEY SMALL BUSINESS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM

The ECN Concept for Quality Assurance of Compost

Phosphorus Removal. Wastewater Treatment

Facility Classification Standards

Waste and Cost Reduction Techniques for Small Parts Cleaners

OPTIMIZING BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL FROM AN SBR SYSTEM MIDDLEBURY, VT. Paul Klebs, Senior Applications Engineer Aqua-Aerobic Systems, Inc.

NPDES Permit No. IL Notice No. AAH: ajo. Public Notice Beginning Date: April 28, Public Notice Ending Date: May 30, 2011

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY BATNEEC GUIDANCE NOTE. Class 4.1 PROCESSING OF ASBESTOS AND THE MANUFACTURE AND PROCESSING OF ASBESTOS BASED PRODUCTS

Transcription:

Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency Environmental Guidelines for Textiles Industry Industry Description and Practices The textile industry uses vegetable fibers such as cotton, animal fibers -- such as wool and silk, and a wide range of synthetic materials such as nylon, polyester, and acrylics. The production of natural fibers is approximately equal in amount to the production of synthetic fibers. Polyester accounts for about 50% of synthetics. (chemical production of the polymers used to make synthetic fiber is not covered in this document.) The stages of textile production are: fiber production, fiber processing and spinning, yarn preparation, fabric production, bleaching, dyeing and printing, and finishing. Each stage generates wastes that require proper management. This document focuses on the wet processes (which includes wool washing, bleaching, dyeing, printing, and finishing) used in textiles processing. Waste Characteristics Textile production involves a number of wet processes that may use solvents. Emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) mainly arise from textiles finishing, drying processes, and solvent use. VOC concentrations vary from 10 milligrams of carbon per cubic meter (mg/m 3 ) for the thermosol process to 350 mg carbon/m 3 for drying and condensation process. Processes wastewater is a major source of pollutants. It is typically alkaline and has high BOD 5 (700 to 2,000 milligrams per liter (mg/l)) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) (approximately 2 to 5 times the biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) level), solids, oil and possibly toxic organics, including phenols (from dyeing and finishing) and halogenated organics (from processes such as bleaching). Dye wastewaters are frequently highly colored and may contain heavy metals such as copper and chromium. Wool processing may release bacteria and other pathogens. Pesticides are sometimes used for the preservation of natural fibers and these are transferred to wastewaters during washing and scouring operations. Pesticides are also used for moth proofing, brominated flame retardants for synthetic fabrics, and isocyanates for lamination (Note: The use of pesticides and other chemicals which are banned in OECD countries is discouraged and in general, not acceptable). Wastewaters should be checked for pesticides (such as DDT and PCP), and metals (such as mercury, arsenic, and copper). Air emissions include dust, oil mists, acid vapors, odors, and boiler exhausts. Cleaning and production changes result in sludges from tanks and spent process chemicals, which may contain toxic organics and metals. Pollution Prevention and Control Pollution prevention programs should focus on reduction in water use and on more efficient use of process chemicals. Process changes might include the following: Match process variables to type and weight of fabric (reduces wastes by 10 to 20%). 505

Textiles Industry 506 Manage batches to minimize waste at the end of cycles. Avoid non-degradable or less degradable surfactants (in washing and scouring), and spinning oils. Avoid the use, or at least the discharge of, alkyllphenol-ethoxylates. Oone depleting substances should not be used and the use of organic solvents should be minimized. Use transfer printing for synthetics (reduces water consumption from 250 to 2 L/kg of material and also reduces dye consumption). Use water-based printing pastes, when feasible. Use pad batch-dyeing (saves up to 80% of energy requirements and 90% of water consumption, as well as reducing dye and salt usage). For knitted goods, exhaust dyeing is preferred. Use jet dyers (with a liquid to fabric ratio of 4 to 8) instead of winch dyers (with a ratio of 15), where feasible. Avoid benzidine-based azo dyes and dyes containing cadmium and other heavy metals. Do not use chlorine-based dyes. Use less toxic dye carriers and finishing agents. Avoid carriers containing chlorine (such as chlorinated aromatics). Dichromate oxidation of vat dyes and sulfur dyes should be substituted by peroxide oxidation. Reuse dye solution from dye baths. Use peroxide-based bleaches instead of sulfur and chlorine-based, where feasible. Control make-up chemicals. Reuse and recover process chemicals such as caustic (reduces chemical costs by 30%) and size (up to 50% recovery is feasible). Wastewater Characteristics Process Wool processing a Average unscoured stock b Unit (U) Waste volume m 3 /U BOD 5 kg/u TSS kg/u metric ton of wool 544 314 196 Oil Cr Phenol Other Pollutants Name kg/u 191 1.33 0.17 1.33 0.17 Average scoured stock metric ton of wool 537 87 43 Cr Phenol Process-specific Scouring metric ton of wool 17 227 153 Oil 191 Dyeing metric ton of wool 25 27 Cr 1.33 Phenol 0.17 Washing metric ton of wool 362 63 Carbonizing metric ton of wool 138 2 44 Bleaching metric ton of wool 12.5 1.4 Cotton processing Average compounded c metric ton of cotton 265 115 70 Processing-specific Yarn sizing metric ton of cotton 4.2 2.8 Desizing metric ton of cotton 22 58 30 Kiering metric ton of cotton 100 53 22 Bleaching metric ton of cotton 100 8 5 Mercerizing metric ton of cotton 35 8 2.5 Dyeing metric ton of cotton 50 60 25 Printing metric ton of cotton 14 54 12 Rayon processing metric ton of rayon 42 30 55 Acetate processing metric ton of acetate 75 45 40 Nylon processing metric ton of mylon 125 45 30 Acrylic processing metric ton of acrylic 210 125 87 Polyester processing metric ton of polyester 100 185 95

Pollution Prevention and Abatement Fruit and Vegetable Processing January 31, 1996 Page 507 a The ph varies widely, from 1.9 to 10.4. b The average compounded load factors listed are based on the assumption that only 20% of the product is mercerized (only non-woolen components are mercerized) and 10% is bleached. c The average compounded load factors listed are based on the assumption that only 35% of the product is mercerized, 50% of the product is dyed and 14% of the product is printed. Source: World Health Organization, 1993. Substitute non-degradable spin finish and sizes with degradable alternatives. Use biodegradable textile preservation chemicals. Do not use polybrominated diphenylethers, dieldrin, arsenic, mercury, and pentachlorophenol in moth proofing, carpet backing, and other finishing processes. Where feasible, use permethrin for moth proofing instead. Control the quantity and temperature of water used. Use counter current rinsing. Improve cleaning and housekeeping measures (may reduce water usage to less than 150 m 3 /t of textiles produced). Recover heat from wash water (reduces steam consumption). Target Pollution Loads Implementation of cleaner production processes and pollution prevention measures can provide both economic and environmental benefits. The following production-related waste load figures can be achieved by implementing measures such as those detailed in the previous section. The figures are the waste loads arising from the production processes before the addition of pollution control measures. Air Emissions VOC emissions should be less than 1 kg carbon/t of fabric. Wastewater Wastewater load levels should preferably be less than 100 m 3 per ton of fabric up to 150 m 3 considered acceptable. Treatment Technologies VOC abatement measures include the use of scrubbers, adsorbers using activated carbon, and routing the vapors through a combustion system. A common approach to treatment of wastewaters is screening, flow equalization, and then settling to remove suspended solids, followed by biological treatment. Physicalchemical treatment is also practiced. In this treatment careful control of ph followed by the addition, coagulant (such as alum) before settling can achieve good first-stage treatment. If further treatment to reduce BOD 5 is required, it can be provided in oxidation ponds if space permits (or another aerobic process, with up to 95% removal of BOD 5 ). Average effluent levels of 30 to 50 mg/l BOD 5 will be obtained. Anaerobic treatment systems are not widely used for textile wastes. Carbon adorption is sometimes used to enhance removal. In some cases, precipitation and filtration may also be required. Up to 90% recovery of size is feasible by partial recycling of prewash and additional ultrafiltration of diluted wash water. Disinfection of wastewaters from wool processing may be required to reduce coliform levels. Residues and sludges often contain toxic organic chemicals and metals. These should be properly managed, with final disposal in an approved secure landfill. Sludges containing halogenated organics and other toxic organics should be effectively treated (such as by incineration) before disposal of the residue in a secure landfill. Emission Guidelines Emission levels for the design and operation of each project must be established through the Environmental Assessment (EA) process, based on country legislation and the Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook as applied to local conditions. The emission levels selected must be justified in the EA and acceptable to MIGA. The following guidelines present emission levels normally acceptable to the World Bank Group in making decisions regarding provision of World Bank Group assistance, including 507

Textiles Industry 508 MIGA guarantees; any deviations from these levels must be described in the project documentation. The guidelines are expressed as concentrations to facilitate monitoring. Dilution of air emissions or effluents to achieve these guidelines is unacceptable. All of the maximum levels should be achieved for at least 95% of the time that the plant or unit is operating, to be calculated as a proportion of annual operating hours. Air Emissions VOC emissions should be reduced to less than 1 kg carbon per metric ton of fabric (or 20 milligrams per normal cubic meter (mg/nm 3 )) by implementing measures such as routing the extracted air from the solvent usage areas through a combustion system (such as a boiler). Liquid Effluents The following effluent levels should be achieved: Effluents from the Textiles Industry* Parameter Maximum value milligrams per liter (mg/l) ph 6-9 BOD 5 50 COD 250 AOX 8 Total suspended solids 50 Oil and grease 10 Pesticides (each) 0.05 Chromium (total) 0.5 Cobalt 0.5 Copper 0.5 Nickel 0.5 Zinc 2 Phenol 0.5 Sulfide 1 Temperature increase less than 3 C 1 Coliform 400 Most Probable Number/100 ml * Mercury should not be used in the process. 1The effluent should result in a temperature increase of no more than 3 degrees Celsius at the edge of the zone where initial mixing and dilution take place. Where the zone is not defined, use 100 meters from the point of discharge. The liquid effluent should not be colored. Note: Effluent requirements are for direct discharge to surface waters. Sludges Sludges containing chromium or other toxics should be treated and disposed in a secure landfill. Incineration of toxic organics should effectively destroy/remove over 99.99% of toxic organics. Ambient Noise Noise abatement measures should achieve either the following levels or a maximum increase in background levels of 3 db(a). Measurements are to be taken at noise receptors located outside the project property boundary. Ambient Noise Receptor Residential; institutional; educational Industrial; commercial Maximum Allowable L eq (hourly), in db(a) Daytime 07:00-22:00 Nighttime 22:00-07:00 55 45 70 70 The emission requirements given here can be consistently achieved by well-designed, welloperated and well-maintained pollution control systems.

509 Textiles Industry Monitoring and Reporting Frequent sampling may be required during start-up conditions. Once a record of consistent performance has been established, sampling for the parameters listed above should be at least on a weekly basis. Only those metals should be monitored which are either detected or suspected to be present. If other heavy metals such as arsenic, cadmium, lead, mercury, and nickel are suspected to be present, then those should be included in the monitoring program and treated to levels mentioned in the General Industry Guidelines. Monitoring data should be analyzed and reviewed at regular intervals and compared with the operating standards so that any necessary corrective actions can be taken. Records of monitoring results should be kept in an acceptable format. These should be reported to the responsible authorities and relevant parties, as required, and provided to MIGA if requested. Key Issues The following box summarizes the key production and control practices that will lead to compliance with emissions guidelines: Avoid the use of less-degradable surfactants (in washing and scouring operations) and spinning oils. Consider the use of transfer printing for synthetics. Use water-based printing pastes, where feasible. Consider the use of pad batch-dyeing. Use jet dyers instead of winch dyers where feasible. Avoid the use of benzidine-based azo dyes and dyes containing cadmium and other heavy metals. Chlorine based dyes should not be used. Do not use mercury, arsenic, and banned pesticides in the process. Control the makeup of chemicals and match process variables to type and weight of fabric. Recover and reuse process chemicals and dye solution. Substitute less toxic dye carriers wherever possible. Avoid carriers containing chlorine. Use peroxide-based bleaches instead of sulfur and chlorine based, where feasible. Adopt counter current rinsing and improved cleaning and housekeeping. Further Information The following are suggested as sources of additional information (these sources are provided for guidance and are not intended to be comprehensive): Gherzi Textile Organization, 1990. The Spinning, Weaving, Knitting, and Processing Sectors to 2000 AD: A Period of Further Dynamic Global Changes. Report prepared for International Finance Corporation Under Contract No. 3090. International Finance Corporation, 1994. Textile Waste Treatment Seminar, June 21, Presentation by Piedmond Olsen Hensley. Modak. 1991. Environmental Aspects of the Textile Industry: A Technical Guide. Prepared for United Nations Environment Programme Industry and Environment Office. Paris Convention for the Prevention of Marine Pollution, Sixth Meeting of the Working Group on Industrial Sectors, Oslo: 17-21 January, 1994. INDSEC 6/12/2-E. Agenda Item 12. Draft Report on Best Available Techniques and Best Environmental Practice for Wet Processes in the Textile Processing Industry, Presented by Belgium United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 1994. The Textile Industry and the Environment. Technical Report No. 16. Paris: UNEP/IE. World Bank, Environment Department. 1996. "Pollution Prevention and Abatement: Textiles Industry." Technical Background Document. World Health Organization. 1993. Assessment of Sources of Air, Water, and Land Pollution. A Guide to Rapid Source Inventory Techniques and their Use in Formulating Environmental Control Strategies. Part One: Rapid Inventory Techniques in Environmental Pollution by Alexander P. Economopoulos. Publication No. WHO/PEP/GETNET/93.1-A.

510