COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY FACULTY QUALIFICATIONS AND ENGAGEMENT



Similar documents
College of Business and Economics, CSU East Bay

Belk College Policy on Qualified Faculty Status

AACSB-Qualification and Participation Guidelines AACSB-QUALIFICATION STANDARDS AACSB-QUALIFICATION: INITIAL AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS

School of Management Faculty Qualifications and Engagement Expectations

Standards for Faculty Sufficiency & Faculty Qualifications

Pamplin Definitions for use with AACSB 2013 Faculty Classifications

1. Attendance at discipline, program, school, faculty or university meetings, including, for example school assessment board.

The Belk College of Business Policy Statement on Academic and Professional Qualifications

CBT CREDENTIALING AND QUALIFICATION EXPECTATIONS 1 College of Business and Technology The University of Texas at Tyler

APSU College of Business Policy for Faculty Retention, Tenure, Promotion & Annual Review of Tenured Faculty. For Review by Faculty, August 2013

The Relevant Standards: Academic Qualification (AQ):

Professional Qualification for Faculty (Full-time, Part-time, Adjunct) at Cardinal Strich University

AACSB Business Accreditation Standards 2013 & 2003

Deploying Professionally Qualified Faculty: An Interpretation of AACSB Standards An AACSB White Paper issued by:

A spreadsheet approach for monitoring faculty intellectual contributions

COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION GUIDELINES

Faculty Development Plan

Overview. Regional and Specialized Accreditation: SACSCOC and AACSB SACSCOC 2014 Annual Meeting CS Caveats

UNO College of Business Administration (CBA) Requirements regarding Academically Qualified (AQ) and Professionally Qualified (PQ) Faculty

A FRAMEWORK FOR FACULTY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND MERIT ALLOCATION

Clemson University College of Health, Education, and Human Development School of Nursing Promotion, Tenure, and Appointment Renewal Guidelines

Dr. Obaid AlMotairy Dean, College of Business and Economics Qassim University

School of Architecture and Interior Design Criteria for Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

School of Accountancy Promotion and Tenure Guidelines Adopted 05/05/11

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey School of Nursing Legacy CON Faculty

UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER William E. Simon Graduate School of Business Administration. Proposal for a Clinical Faculty Track

Texas Southern University

College of Education Clinical Faculty Appointment and Promotion Criteria Provost Approved 11/11/11

Department of Child & Family Development Promotion and Tenure Guidelines November 2004

College of Natural and Social Sciences Guidelines on Promotion and Tenure

SCHOOL OF URBAN AFFAIRS & PUBLIC POLICY CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES FOR PROMOTION AND TENURE

GUIDELINES FOR GRADUATE COURSES OFFERED FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF SCHOOL PERSONNEL

TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF GRADUATE STUDIES GRADUATE COUNCIL

Department of Marketing Promotion and Tenure Guidelines February 2011

College of Medicine Promotion and Tenure Procedure FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY

The National Communication Association s Standards for Undergraduate Communication Programs Updated April, 2011

I. Preamble II. Weighting of Promotion and Tenure Criteria III. Appointment Criteria for Tripartite Faculty Assistant Professor...

Tenure and Promotion Criteria and Procedures Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208

Faculty Appointments, Promotions and Titles at The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth

GRADUATE PROGRAM REVIEW POLICY. Texas Southern University

Department of Business, Management and Accounting

AACSB & Faculty Sufficiency in Troubling Economic Times. Michael C. Villano, CPA, CMA. Kent State University

SCHOOL OF MASS COMMUNICATION AND JOURNALISM THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI TENURE AND PROMOTION POLICY MISSION STATEMENT

Department of Marketing / College of Business Florida State University BYLAWS. Approved by a majority of faculty

PROCEDURES AND EVALUATIVE GUIDELINES FOR PROMOTION OF TERM FACULTY DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY MARCH 31, 2014

Office of thy Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs. DAC Revision Approval; Department of Psychology

CLINICAL DEPARTMENTS STATEMENT OF FACULTY ORGANIZATION, STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR RANK (Approved 9/27/94) (Revised 10/13/04, 12/20/05, 12/2007)

Review of the M.S. in Accountancy

Requirements for Certification of Faculty. For Graduate Instruction. College of Business and Public Administration

School of Social Work Stephen F. Austin State University

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE. Department of Linguistics & Cognitive Science. Promotion and Tenure Document

DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINSTRATION POLICY ON REAPPOINTMENT, TENURE, AND PROMOTION (RTP)

FACULTY INTELLECTUAL CONTRIBUTIONS UNDER THE 2009 AACSB INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

FACULTY INTELLECTUAL CONTRIBUTIONS UNDER THE NEW AACSB INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

All College Meeting Minutes Haworth College of Business. February 21, Kay Palan, Satish Deshpande, Ann Veeck, KC Chen, Alan Rea

AACSB INTERNATIONAL SELF EVALUATION REPORT GUIDELINES

University of Missouri-Columbia. MU Sinclair School of Nursing. GUIDELINES for APPOINTMENT, REAPPOINTMENT, and PROMOTION of NON-REGULAR FACULTY

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine GUIDELINES FOR FACULTY APPOINTMENT AND PROMOTION

Department of Applied Arts and Sciences. University of Montana- Missoula College of Technology

Policy on Academic Tracks and Promotions for the School of Nursing (SON) at the American University of Beirut (AUB)

I. Teaching Responsibilities/Instructional Activities

The University of West Florida. Department of Criminology & Criminal Justice. Bylaws

The University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences Faculty Tracks for Academic Rank and Criteria for Promotion

THE CHANCELLOR S DOCTORAL INCENTIVE PROGRAM. Commitment to Excellence with Diversity 2016/2017 APPLICATION.

College of Business AACSB Continuous Improvement Review Accreditation Report

In order to assist and guide faculty members preparing for tenure evaluations, the competencies to be considered are in three categories:

PUBLIC AND COMMUNITY SERVICE GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATING FACULTY

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA

B. Scholarly Activity

7.1.2 Class Placement Requirements for Initial Placement and/or Class Changes

Graduate Faculty Constitution

JO LYNNE KOEHN Professor of Accountancy

2. CRITERIA FOR APPOINTMENT, REAPPOINTMENT, AND PROMOTION OF FULL-TIME FACULTY MEMBERS, UCSDM

THE GRADUATE SCHOOL CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY. By-Laws. ARTICLE I Definitions

Program Personnel Standards Approval Form. Disciplrne: Nursing. ','J1* )lplll. RTP Committeehair Date i

College of Education and Health Professions School of Nursing

School of Visual Arts. Strategic Plan,

The Society of Architectural Historians Guidelines for the Promotion and Tenure of Architectural Historians

Transcription:

COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY FACULTY QUALIFICATIONS AND ENGAGEMENT AACSB International accreditation Standard 15 requires accredited schools to develop policies, aligned with the CBT s mission, that provide criteria for classifying faculty according to initial academic preparation, professional experience, ongoing scholarship, and ongoing professional engagement. Faculty are to be classified into one of four categories: Scholarly Academic (SA), Practice Academic (PA), Scholarly Practitioner (SP), or Instructional Practitioner (IP). The definition of these categories and the criteria to obtain and maintain the specific faculty status are outlined below. All full-time faculty are expected to qualify for one of the four categories. Note that maintaining a particular faculty status is independent of annual evaluation criteria, performance levels required for continuation of employment, or promotion/tenure criteria. Qualifying as a SA, for example, in no way implies or guarantees a positive annual evaluation or meeting the criteria for promotion or tenure (or vice-versa). Sustained engagement activities Academic Research/Scholarly Applied/Practice Initial academic preparation and professional experience Professional experience, substantial in duration and level of responsibility Doctoral degree Scholarly Practitioners (SP) Scholarly Academics (SA) Instructional Practitioners (IP) Practice Academics (PA) Based on the AACSB standards, the definitions for each category are: Scholarly Academic (SA) Normally, a doctoral degree emphasizing advanced foundational discipline-based research is appropriate initial academic preparation for SA status, and there must be ongoing, sustained, and substantive academic activities supporting the SA status. A faculty member is classified as SA if he or she has: Approved March 2015

1. Completed appropriate academic preparation in the teaching area as evidenced by a doctorate or appropriate terminal degree in the teaching area, or a closely associated area. Normally, faculty members who have earned their research doctorate or appropriate terminal degree within the past five years prior to the review dates are granted SA status. 2. Demonstrated currency through sustained and substantive academic activities relevant to the faculty member s field of teaching. To maintain SA status, during the previous five years, a faculty member must: Author 3 publications from the A+, A, or B categories from the new CBT journal list or Exceptional, Meritorious, or Good categories from the old CBT journal list (a publication from the A+ or Exceptional categories will count as 2 publications) plus 50 points from the Intellectual Contributions or Academic Engagement categories. OR Author 2 publications as above (or one A+ or Exceptional publication) and a significant externally-funded research grant (a particularly large award may count for 2 publications) plus 50 points from the Intellectual Contributions or Academic Engagement categories. Practice Academic (PA) Normally, a doctoral degree emphasizing advanced foundational discipline-based research is appropriate initial academic preparation for PA status, and there must be ongoing, sustained, and substantive professional engagement activities supporting the PA status. A faculty member is classified as PA if he or she has: 1. Completed appropriate academic preparation in the teaching area as evidenced by a doctorate or appropriate terminal degree in the teaching area, or a closely associated area. 2. Demonstrated currency through academic and professional engagement activities related to the faculty member s field of teaching. To maintain PA status, a faculty member must earn, during the previous five years, a minimum of 75 points from the Maintenance of Qualifications List, with at least 50 points from the Academic Engagement or Professional Engagement categories. 2

Scholarly Practitioner (SP) Normally, SP status applies to practitioner faculty members who augment their experience with development and engagement activities involving scholarly activities in their fields of teaching. A faculty member is classified as SP if he or she has: 1. Completed appropriate academic preparation in the teaching area normally evidenced by a master s degree in a discipline related to his or her field of teaching. At the time of hire, the faculty member s professional experience is current, substantial in terms of duration and level of responsibility, and clearly linked to the field in which the person is expected to teach. 2. Demonstrated currency through academic and professional engagement activities related to the faculty member s field of teaching. To maintain SP status, a faculty member must earn, during the previous five years, a minimum of 50 points from the Maintenance of Qualifications List, with at least 40 points from the Intellectual Contributions and Academic Engagement sections. Instructional Practitioner (IP) Normally, IP status is granted to newly hired faculty members who join the faculty with significant and substantive professional experience. A faculty member is classified as IP if he or she has: 1. Completed appropriate academic preparation in the teaching area normally evidenced by a master s degree in a discipline related to his or her field of teaching. At the time of hire, the faculty member s professional experience is current, substantial in terms of duration and level of responsibility, and clearly linked to the field in which the person is expected to teach. 2. Demonstrated currency through sustained professional engagement activities in the faculty member s field of teaching. A faculty member may undertake a variety of ongoing professional engagement activities to interact with business and management practice to support maintenance of IP status. To maintain IP status, a faculty member must earn, during the previous five years, a minimum of 50 points from the Academic Engagement or Professional Engagement sections of the Maintenance of Qualifications List. 3

Maintenance of Qualifications List POINTS INTELLECTUAL CONTRIBUTIONS 40 Significant externally funded research grant 40 Publication from the A+ journal list (new) 30 Publication from the A journal list (new) 15 Publication from the B journal list (new) 40 Publication from the Exceptional journal list (old) 30 Publication from the Meritorious journal list (old) 15 Publication from the Good journal list (old) 10 Published refereed proceedings at a national conference 10 Author on a 2 nd or higher textbook or scholarly book 10 Publication of a case in a refereed journal 10 Publication of software 10 Medium size research grant 5 Grants or Contracts for equipment, service, etc. 5 Small research grant 5 Published refereed proceeding at a regional conference 5 Published refereed journal article not on the CBT journal list 5 Publication in a trade journal 5 Publication of a case in a text book 5 Publication of a book chapter or monograph 5 Author of a pedagogical text book supplement other than test manual 5 Published book review POINTS ACADEMIC ENGAGEMENT 15 Officer or Board member of a national academic organization 15 Editor or Associate Editor of a journal on the A or A+ journal list 15 Editorial review board member of a journal on the A or A+ journal list 10 Officer or Board member of state or regional professional organization 10 Program chair at a national conference 10 Obtaining a professional certification 10 Editor, Associate Editor, or Editorial Board for a journal on the B journal list 5 Editor, Associate Editor, or Editorial Board for peer-reviewed journal not on the CBT journal list 5 Track chair at a national conference 5 Program chair at a regional conference 5 Present a paper, workshop, or panel at national conference 5 Attendance at a national or regional academic conference 5 Reviewer for a national or regional conference 5 Ad Hoc reviewer for a journal or grant 4

POINTS PROFESSIONAL ENGAGEMENT 50 Substantive experience in a managerial/professional role in previous 5 years 15 Officer or Board member of a national professional organization 10 Consulting projects (each) 10 Board of Directors of business or non-profit organization 10 Leadership of business professional associations 10 Faculty internships 10 Own/operate a business (each year maximum 30 points) 10 Expert witness in case related to discipline area 10 Editor or Associate Editor of practitioner or trade publication 5 Editorial Review Board of practitioner or trade publication 5 Continuing professional education (maximum of 20 points over 5-year period) 5 Developing or presenting executive education programs 5 Developing or presenting practitioner-related workshops 5 Leadership or active involvement in practitioner-related events 5 Presentation at a trade or professional (non-academic) meeting in discipline area 5 Author/editor of a newspaper column or practitioner newsletter 5 Attendance at a practitioner (non-academic) conference The faculty member is responsible for maintaining a portfolio of evidence to support his or her participation in the qualifying activities for SA, PA, SP or IP status. The portfolio will presented to and discussed with the Chair/Coordinator during the annual evaluation process. The Chair/Coordinator will specify the appropriate category for the faculty member. If deemed necessary by the Chair/Coordinator, a development plan will be established. 5

Faculty Qualifications for Administrators Administrators who have minimal or no teaching responsibilities (Dean or Associate Dean) may be either SA or PA with PA being the normal expectation. Administrators can maintain their PA status by engaging in a variety of professional development activities. A minimum of 50 points from activities listed in the Intellectual Contributions, Academic Engagement, and Professional Engagement sections and/or activities specific to senior academic leaders in a College of Business listed in the Administrative Engagement section below must be earned during the previous five year period. POINTS ADMINISTRATIVE ENGAGEMENT 20 Publishing articles about academic leadership or education issues 15 Serving in a leadership role in a regional or national professional associations 15 Serving as an AACSB consultant or peer review team member 10 Participation in AACSB conferences and workshops 10 Serving in a significant role in local government organizations 10 Serving on the boards of companies and philanthropic organizations 10 Involvement with the Chamber of commerce 10 Involvement with accreditation agencies relevant to the college 5 Participating in continuing education such as is required for CPA s For administrators who also have some teaching responsibilities (Department Chairs or Coordinators, Directors (undergraduate and graduate), or Associate Dean) may be SA or PA with SA being the normal expectation. These administrators can maintain their SA status by publishing and engaging in a variety of activities from the Intellectual Contributions or Academic Engagement categories. To maintain SA status, during the previous five years, an administrative faculty member must: Author 2 publications from the A+, A, or B categories from the new CBT journal list or Exceptional, Meritorious, or Good categories from the old CBT journal list (a publication from the A+ or Exceptional categories will count as 2 publications) plus 75 points from the Intellectual Contributions or Academic Engagement categories. OR Author 1 publication as above (or one A+ or Exceptional publication) and a significant externally-funded research grant (a particularly large award may count for 2 publications) plus 75 points from the Intellectual Contributions or Academic Engagement categories. 6

Participating and Supporting Faculty AACSB Standard 5 requires the school to maintain sufficient, qualified faculty to meet its mission. Depending upon their responsibilities, faculty must be either designated Participating Faculty or Supporting Faculty. Participating Faculty are those who participate in activities beyond the instruction of their classes. All full-time continuing faculty designated as Participating Faculty, regardless of rank, are expected to provide effective and meaningful instruction, engage in course/curricular decisions, advise students, conduct research, complete service assignments, and have a voice in relevant policy decisions. In addition, adjunct faculty and part-time faculty members who engage in course/curricular decisions and take part in and vote in faculty meetings for those purposes are designated Participating Faculty. Supporting Faculty are those who are assigned to instructional responsibilities without any expectations for involvement in course/curricular decision making, research, or service activities. 7