Technology Enhanced Learning Plan

Similar documents
Technology Enhanced Learning Strategy and Implementation Plan

E LEARNING STRATEGY 1. INTRODUCTION

The Five Key Elements of Student Engagement

UCL Personal Tutoring Strategy

POLICY Personal Academic Tutoring Policy

Blackburn College Teaching, Learning and Assessment Strategy. 25 August 2015

POSTGRADUATE PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

TEACHING AND LEARNING STRATEGY to 2005

Information Strategy

Enterprise Education Mission, Vision and Strategy

Higher Education Review: Themes for Background and introduction. 2 The themes for Rationale for the themes identified

The University of Reading. e-learning Strategy

Organisational and Leadership Development at UWS

Full-time MSc in Logistics and Supply Chain Management

FOCUS MONASH. Strategic Plan

HE learning and teaching: vision

JOB DESCRIPTION. Curriculum Leader Full Cost Recovery (FCR) A minimum of 36 hours per week to meet the requirements of the post.

University of Bradford N/A N/A N/A

UNIVERSITY OF KENT E-LEARNING STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN UPDATED MAY 2011

Summary Report on the Mahara e-portfolio Pilot Project

Appointment details Lecturer/Senior Lecturer in Accounting

TRANSPORT FOR LONDON CORPORATE PANEL

Research and Innovation Strategy: delivering a flexible workforce receptive to research and innovation

Board of Member States ERN implementation strategies

Diploma and Foundation Degree in Merchanting

3.2 Stranmillis University College

Introduction Outcomes of the Institutional audit... 1

Corporate Strategy

customer-service equality standard

Strategy Providing resources for staff and students in higher and further education in the UK and beyond

Personal Development Planning and eportfolio. Student Guide

LEARNING, TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT STRATEGY APRIL 2008

Strategic Improvement Plan

The Requirements for Community Learning and Development (Scotland) Regulations 2013: Guidance for Local Authorities

Course Specification. PGCE Early Childhood Care and Education (0 5 years) with recommendation for EYTS (PGECC)

Valuing Research Staff Implementing the Concordat

BA (Hons) Air Transport with Commercial Pilot Training (Top-up)

Strategic Plan to Working Together for Australian Sport

Educational Gateway Development

The Standards for Leadership and Management: supporting leadership and management development December 2012

Personal Development Planning

Dublin Institute of Technology Strategic Plan

Connect Renfrewshire

Course Specification MSc Information Management (INMAM)

STRATEGY FOR ENHANCING STUDENT EMPLOYABILITY

Kent Strategy For E-Learning

The internationalisation strategy proposed for the period starts from and supports the University s vision that:

University of Edinburgh Risk Policy and Risk Appetite

Relationship Manager (Banking) Assessment Plan

REPORT OF THE SERVICE DIRECTOR - HUMAN RESOURCES AND CUSTOMER SERVICE

QUALITY ASSURANCE DOCUMENT QA3 - PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

The South Staffordshire and Shropshire Health Care NHS Foundation Trust Digital Strategy

7 Directorate Performance Managers. 7 Performance Reporting and Data Quality Officer. 8 Responsible Officers

HONG KONG BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Enhanced Learning and Teaching Using Technology: An Institutional Strategy

University Strategy. 2015/16 to 2020/21

The University of Manchester elearning Strategy

Nottingham Trent University Course Specification

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES The roles and responsibilities expected of teachers at each classification level are specified in the Victorian Government

Foundation Year in Social Sciences and

RHODES UNIVERSITY LANGUAGE POLICY DATE OF APPROVAL BY RELEVANT COMMITTEE STRUCTURE:

Programme Specification

Nottingham Trent University Nottingham Business School

at London Business School Transforming Your Future Developing Leaders at Lloyd s

Strategic Plan

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

Online Courses cuconline.coventry.ac.uk

Centres of Vocational Excellence: Heralding a New Era for Further Education

N/A. Computing, Engineering

5/30/2012 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT GOING AGILE. Nicolle Strauss Director, People Services

Corporate Director Environment & Community Services

Advanced Higher Art and Design (Expressive) Course Specification (C705 77)

2. Roles and responsibilities

Strategic Plan

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRATEGY Information Technology Services

Liverpool John Moores University 7 October 2010

Flinders Future Focus Strategic Plan Differentiate Focus IntensiFy

A Changing Commission: How it affects you - Issue 1

Hertfordshire Higher Education Consortium Early Years. Foundation Degree A C

INVESTORS IN PEOPLE ASSESSMENT REPORT

The elearning Competency Framework for Teachers and Trainers

University of Strathclyde: Information Services Directorate Operational Plan for 2014/15

How good is our school?

Turku School of Economics: Strategy for

Management School. MSc/PG Dip/PG Cert. Banking and Finance. University of Stirling Management School

MOE Online Class Quality Guidelines

Numeracy across learning Principles and practice

ICT Strategic Framework for Education SUPPORTING LEARNING IN A CONNECTED SECTOR THROUGH THE SMART USE OF ICT

Customer Service Strategy

Review of Third Sector Organisations. Scottish Social Enterprise Academy 2 August 2011

Marketing Manager. MS National Centre, London

Pre-Masters. Science and Engineering

Transforming lives Meeting needs Building careers. Strategic plan

Developing the Young Workforce. Career Education Standard (3-18)

Building a Sustainable MOD and Defence Industry: Challenges and Opportunities

St Michael s Primary School. ICT School Policy Data Protection and E Safety

CHIEF NURSE / DIRECTOR OF CLINICAL GOVERNANCE

Corporate business plan

Birmingham City University Faculty of Technology, Engineering and the Environment. Programme Specification. MEng Mechanical Engineering

HR Enabling Strategy

The Open University Widening Access and Success Strategy

Transcription:

Technology Enhanced Learning Plan 2012-2020 PART ONE Introduction The UWE TEL Policy 2007-2010 concentrated upon ensuring that structures and systems were appropriate for, and effectively facilitated the development of, TEL across the university. The 2007-2010 policy was successfully achieved by 2010. The current plan now moves on to address the development of learning opportunities that utilise these systems in ways that enhance both student and staff experiences, and that enable the university to achieve a sustainable future in a continuously transforming technological context. The purpose of this planned review of the Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) strategy 2012 2017 is to amend and further develop it in the light of progress to date and the introduction of the UWE Bristol Strategy 2020 (Strategy 2020) and create Phase 2 of the plan. To fit in with the changes brought about by Strategy 2020, and to line up with other plans that operationalise the strategy, the previous title of TEL Strategy is now changed to TEL Plan. For the same reasons the time frame for this plan is extended to 2020, but continues to incorporate planned review points every 2 years in recognition of the rapid rate of change in learning technologies and practices. The review on the operation of the TEL strategy from 2012 to 2014 is at Appendix 1. Governance This plan is steered and monitored by the TEL Steering Group, which reports to AQEC and then on to Academic Board. Reviews of this plan will take place in June 2016 and June 2018, with the facility to undertake further reviews if circumstances require. Context Technology enhanced learning is described by JISC (2010) as a culture where a broad range of learners are provided with a robust technology environment that provides effective learning opportunities, wherever the learner chooses to learn. Most universities are now moving away from earlier, technology-focussed, definitions of e-learning and are now emphasising the learning experiences of students and the teaching experiences of staff. As Marshall (2010) comments the use of the technology itself is increasingly not a distinguishing factor for organisations, but rather the quality of that use and the way it advances the goals of a change-resilient organisation become essential to success. UWE has a robust technological framework upon which to build enhancements in effective and flexible learning, teaching and assessment opportunities. The university also makes a significant investment in staff and student support facilities. These are available centrally, e.g. the Learning Development Centre which offers training for staff, the IT and library help-desk support for students and staff, and the Education Innovation Centre which encourages networking, innovation and development in teaching and learning across the university. And locally in the Faculties, e.g. TEL support teams, and local help desks. There are many examples of innovative and effective uses of technology across the university and an appetite amongst staff and students to engage with new technologies. This plan therefore focusses upon the university s aspirations for future learning and teaching developments and how our existing practice can be further advanced. UWE recognises that these aspirations require the continuing development of an effective culture, as described by JISC above. It also recognises the importance of active engagement with technology across all the university s processes.

The university also recognises that students experiences are highly dependent upon their interactions with university staff. The staff experience lies at the heart of the student experience, and is also important in its own right. Guiding principles UWE Bristol Strategy 2020 The university s core purposes are advancing knowledge, inspiring people and transforming futures. Strategy 2020 states our four ambitions to be achieved by 2020. These are to be best for: 1. Professionally recognised and practice-oriented programmes 2. Connecting and working with our local and regional economy 3. Being digitally advanced, agile and responsive, and 4. Being inclusive and global. Our four priorities for action are: 1. Outstanding learning 2. Ready and able graduates 3. Research with impact, and 4. Strategic partnerships, connections and networks. The four strategic programmes that are currently the focus of delivering the strategy and the priorities for action are: 1. Practice-oriented 2. Staff performance and development 3. Technological development, and 4. Campus development The strategy is also being delivered through corporate level action plans, projects and tasks, which include: Teaching and Learning Enhancement plan Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) plan (to which this document refers) Widening participation strategic statement Single equality scheme action plan Sustainability plan Research plan and further projects and plans that address other specific areas of action (from Context setting for UWE Strategy 2013-14, UWE Policy and Strategy). This review of the current TEL plan addresses the relevant aspects of Strategy 2020 and aligns with the structure and actions of other corporate level plans. External considerations The HEFCE TEL Strategy (2009) states that the benefits of TEL can be measured by reference to three criteria, viz. 1. Efficiency (processes carried out in a more cost-effective, time-effective, sustainable and scalable manner) 2. Enhancement (improving existing student and staff experiences, learning outcomes and accessibility to study), and 3. Transformation (radical positive changes to existing processes or introducing new and innovative processes). The need for agility in our decision-making and operational processes is clearly demonstrated in the field of TEL. The UK HE market is crowded and competitive, and rapidly-developing learning technologies can give institutions a competitive edge if they are recognised and cultivated early enough. To do this we need effective decision-making, a strong and adaptable IT infrastructure and a workforce that is confident and skilled in the use of learning technologies. This plan therefore focusses upon developing a culture in the university that values: Engagement with technology Willingness to change Optimism Open-mindedness Responsible risk-taking, and

Staff and student communities of practice PART TWO Key principles Strategy 2020 makes it clear that we want to enable our students to be ready to contribute to society, and be able to grow and succeed in their work and lives, in a rapidly changing technological environment. The overarching theme to this action plan is the continued normalisation of the use of technology in learning, teaching and assessment, thereby bringing about a culture change that makes UWE an agile leader in the field of TEL. There is a particular emphasis on developing student and staff communities of practice in teaching, learning and assessment, to enable UWE to be responsive both to student needs, and to the wider technological environment. This action plan contains 4 headline principles, which are each broken down into key themes. The rapidly-changing nature of learning technologies and practices makes it difficult to have specific actions or KPIs, and departments and faculties have differing practices and needs in any case. So, faculties are encouraged to develop their own, more detailed plans, in line with these principles and themes.

1. Enhancing student experience Headline principle Enhancing the experiences of all UWE students through effective, agile and advanced uses of technology, wherever and however they participate in learning and assessment activities, taking account of physical and mental disability, social mobility, physical location and cultural considerations. Purpose This principle is about enhancing student experience through the effective use of learning technologies. Strategy 2020 stresses being digitally advanced and agile, and the importance of being inclusive and global in our activities. The key themes under this principle are therefore aimed at increasing our sophistication and experience in effective use of learning technologies, and providing flexible, mobile and personalised learning experiences for our students. Key themes Increasing mobile learning opportunities for students. Increasing personalised learning opportunities for students. Increasing the sophistication of use of learning technologies, including using the full range of facilities offered by the Blackboard VLE, lecture capture and associated learning tools, desktop capture and social networking tools. Continuing to develop learning opportunities that are flexible in location and timing.

2. Enhancing staff experience and creating communities of practice Headline principle Enhance the teaching, tutoring, assessment, support and research experiences of UWE staff, and develop a responsive community of practice in the effective use of learning technologies, comprising both staff and students. Purpose This principle relates to the staff experience, which lies at the heart of the student experience, and the creation of communities of practice involving both staff and students. Strategy 2020 emphasises a responsive digital environment, and an effective way to achieve this is for staff to interact with students to create active learning communities. This principle therefore moves away from the student survey approach to responsiveness and takes a more dynamic, constructive and conversational approach. Key themes Fostering networks, connections and communities inside and outside the university. Developing inclusive social networking opportunities, both physical and virtual, where staff and students can discuss effective teaching, learning and assessment practice. Developing a culture of research and evaluation in learning innovation.

3. Increasing virtualisation for education and sustainability Headline principle Offering learning, teaching and assessment experiences that make increasing use of virtualisation techniques, with a particular emphasis on practice-oriented teaching, learning and assessment. Purpose This principle develops the aim of increasing virtualisation in relation to learning, teaching and assessment, to enhance education, reduce waste and, optimise our use of energy and resources in providing effective educational experiences for students, and working experiences for staff. This principle cross-references theme 9.6, IT and enabling digital media, in the Sustainability Plan. Key themes Offering technology-enhanced, practiceoriented opportunities for students that capitalise upon the different affordances of a range of technologies. Moving towards faculty and university meetings being essentially paperless. Encouraging the appropriate use of lecture capture, desktop capture, videoconferencing and similar video technologies to enhance learning, and to increase accessibility to learning experiences for students. Increasing the effective use of desktop communication technologies for teaching, learning and communication.

4. Curriculum and programme design Headline principle Encourage research and innovation in the design of new curricula, and the re-design of existing curricula, to incorporate effective uses of technology for teaching, learning and assessment with a particular focus on developing practiceoriented modules and programmes. Purpose The purpose of this principle is to encourage innovative course design, which promotes flexibility, inclusiveness, open access and sophistication. There is a particular emphasis on practice-oriented approaches, to help students to be ready and able to make an effective contribution to society upon completion of their studies Key themes Producing open content and developing open practices to exploit the potential of current and developing educational technologies. Encouraging a culture of experimentation and innovation in course design. Developing guidance for programme and module teams on designing opportunities for innovation and flexibility. Developing guidance for programme and module teams on monitoring, evaluation and review processes, regarding the effective use of technology for learning.

References JISC (2010). JISC Strategy 2010-2012. Available from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/aboutus/strategy/strategy1012/executivesummary.aspx Marshall S. (2010). Change, technology and higher education: are universities capable of organisational change? ALT-J, 18, (3), pp. 179-192.