The Economic Impacts of the Commercial Fishing Fleet at the Port of Bellingham 2013

Similar documents
Fishing Sector Analysis of the IO-PAC Model for Productivity

West Coast Charter Boat Survey Summary Report ~2000~

Project Title: Fishing Technology and Conservation Engineering to Reduce Bycatch Contact: Carwyn F. Hammond and Scott McEntire

Fishing & Fishermanning in Seattle

Alaska Saltwater Sport Fishing Charter Business Survey 2012 Season

How To Collect Data From Angler Expenditure Data Collection

Regional Economic Impact of Portland International Airport

Alaska Seafood Industry

The Local and Regional Economic Impacts of the San Francisco International Airport

National Marine Fisheries Service Electronic Monitoring Cooperative Research and Implementation Program

THE FISHERIES REQUIREMENTS FOR AREA IN RELATION TO SEISMIC ACTIVITIES THE FISHERIES

Case 2:10-md CJB-SS Document Filed 05/03/12 Page 1 of 96 EXHIBIT 10

Shrimp and Turbot From a Marketing Perspective

PORT OF SAN FRANCISCO STRATEGIC PLAN. To increase the volume of cargo shipping. To efficiently manage and improve all Port property.

COMMERCIAL LANDINGS STATISTICS RED SNAPPER IN THE GULF OF MEXICO. John Poffenberger 1

Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Western Alaska Community. AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

SABLEFISH PERMIT STACKING PROGRAM- ACTION ISSUES, ELECTRONIC FISH TICKET ANALYSIS

Sitka Charter Fishing Visitor Profile and Impact Analysis Alaska Travelers Survey

RIR for Hagfish Collection of Information

REGIONAL ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGIES IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR WEST COAST MARINE FISHERIES DRAFT JANUARY 27, 2015

Cost Recovery Annual Report

Economic Contribution of Cruise Tourism in Southeast Asia 2014 Major Findings

SERVICES NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE FISHERIES MARKET NEWS HOME PAGES

Fisheries Management: Arctic principles

RESEARCH Massachusetts Recreational Boater Survey. Project Summary

Commercial Fishing Vessel Safety and. The National Marine Fisheries Service- United States Coast Guard. Memorandum on Observer Safety

Fisheries Off West Coast States; Comprehensive Ecosystem-Based Amendment 1;

Estimated Economic Impact of Gulf Oil Spill on Virginia s Oyster Industry July 2010

Research Team: Cornell University Cooperative Extension Marine Program

Fishing Support Service Employment

California Sea Grant College Program UC San Diego

Hawaii Seafood Market for Pelagic Fish Important pelagic fish in the Hawaii seafood market How the price of fish changes from fisherman to consumer

COUNTRY NOTE ON NATIONAL FISHERIES MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS -- GERMANY

Alaska Fishermen s Health Care Challenges and Opportunities

Fall 2008 Alaska Commercial Fishermen and Tender Fuel Survey

E-fish: Regulating quantity or promoting e-quality? Foundations of a new paradigm

2016 ADEC Seafood Processor Permit Application Instructions

Hurricane Ka t rina. Mississippi Commercial Fishing Fleet

Direct. Marketers. Calculating Profitability for a Direct Marketing Operation. Tips for. A feasibility analysis: Don t leave home without it

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE WINE AND GRAPE INDUSTRY IN CANADA 2011

Data Services Prioritization Process. Alaska Regional Office

Comparison of At-Sea Catch Monitoring Programs with Full Observer Coverage to the Directed Atlantic Herring Fishery New England

dedicated to sustainable seafood excellence

The Economic and Community Impact of Downsizing Postal Sorting Operations in New Orleans

Massachusetts. Figure MA_1. Total Economic Impacts Generated in Massachusetts in 2011

Post-Rationalization Restructuring of Commercial Crew Member Opportunities in Bering Sea and Aleutian Island Crab Fisheries

VII. DIRECT, INDIRECT, AND INDUCED ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF UC SAN DIEGO

Georgia. Figure GA_1. Total Economic Impacts Generated in Georgia in 2011

Mississippi. Figure MS_1. Total Economic Impacts Generated in Mississippi in 2011

South Atlantic. - East Florida - Georgia - North Carolina - South Carolina

TOOLS FOR IMPROVING SAFETY MANAGEMENT IN THE NORWEGIAN FISHING FLEET OCCUPATIONAL ACCIDENTS ANALYSIS PERIOD OF

Texas. Figure TX_1. Total Economic Impacts Generated in Texas in 2011

Economic Impact of Trade & Consumer Shows

The economic impact of the UK s Maritime Services Sector

Louisiana. Figure LA_1. Total Economic Impacts Generated in Louisiana in 2011

New Jersey. Figure NJ_1. Total Economic Impacts Generated in New Jersey in 2011

DUNGENESS CRAB REPORT

West Florida. Figure WFL_1. Total Economic Impacts Generated in West Florida in 2011

National Saltwater Recreational Fisheries Policy

SEDAR7-DW-20 Overview of State Trip Ticket Programs in the Gulf of Mexico

2013 Cape Breton Celtic Classic Sydney, Nova Scotia

Juneau Cold Storage: Demand and Financial Analysis

MASSACHUSETTS. Chapter 3. Gloucester, Massachusetts. Chapter 3. Gloucester, Massachusetts. By Sarah Robinson, Coordinator

THE PORT OF LOS ANGELES JOBSPORTFOLIO

The economic impacts of the UK sea fishing and fish processing sectors: An input-output analysis

2012 Project Summary NORTHEAST RECREATIONAL BOATER SURVEY

National Transportation Safety Board

Economic Impact of Redeveloping The World Trade Center Site: New York City, New York State, And the New York-New Jersey Area

TITLE 14. Fish and Game Commission Notice of Proposed Changes in Regulations

Data Collection on Tuna Fisheries in Thailand: The transition of the old practice to the modern technology development

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2006 SCORING GUIDELINES. Question 4

Deployment Performance Review of the 2013 North Pacific Groundfish and Halibut Observer Program

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 3 / Monday, January 6, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

Date 1/2/2014. Prepared for. Virginia Land Investments Patterson Ave., Suite 200 Richmond, VA Cleveland, Ohio. Richmond, Virginia

MADAGASCAR REPORT MADAGASCAR FISHERIES DATA MANAGEMENT

SUPPORTING STATEMENT SOUTH ATLANTIC COMMERCIAL SHRIMP FISHERY ECONOMIC & DEMOGRAPHICS SURVEY OMB CONTROL NO

Cuyahoga County s Clean Ohio Revitalization Fund Round 5 Application Great Lakes Shipyard Expansion Project Attachment A1 Application Summary Document

Recycling Fishing Nets

The Business of Fishing: Managing Finances

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE BEER INDUSTRY IN SOUTH CAROLINA

The Economic Impact of Tourism in New York Calendar Year Catskills Focus

Best Place to Find Real Estate Investing

COORDINATING WORKING PARTY ON FISHERY STATISTICS. Intersessional Meeting. 14 February (p.m.) 15 February (a.m. p.m.) 2006.

Our Growth Story. Growth. Our. Story

The Economic Impact of Tourism in New York Calendar Year Central New York Focus

Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 33 / Tuesday, February 19, 2008 / Rules and Regulations

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr., Vice Admiral, U.S. Navy (Ret.), Under Secretary

IPHC Catch Limit Comment Form

Direct Marketing for Southeast Alaska Shrimpers

COUNTRY NOTE ON NATIONAL FISHERIES MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS -- NORWAY

Executive Director s Budget Message

FLANTRADE INVESTMENTS CC & BRIAN FLANAGAN

London Array. Operations and Maintenance

Therefore, this is a very important question, which encourages consideration of the current management of the resource.

PORT OF CASCADE LOCKS MARINA MOORAGE RULES AND REGULATIONS


Annual report on balance between fishing capacity and fishing opportunities for Croatia

THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE PORTS OF LOUISIANA AND THE MARITIME INDUSTRY

Ontario Mining: A Partner in Prosperity Building - The Economic Impacts of a Representative Mine in Ontario


Transcription:

The Economic Impacts of the Commercial Fishing Fleet at the Port of Bellingham 2013 Prepared for the Port of Bellingham December 31, 2014 Martin Associates 941 Wheatland Ave, Suite 203 Lancaster, PA 17603 www.martinassoc.net

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF COMMERCIAL FISHING ACTIVITY AT THE PORT OF BELLINGHAM In 2013, Martin Associates was retained by the Port of Bellingham to conduct the Port s Economic Impact Study. The study measured the Economic Impacts generated by the Bellingham International Airport, Port of Bellingham Real Estate tenants, the Alaska Marine Highway and Port of Bellingham marina operations. In the interest of local commercial fisherman, the Working Waterfront Coalition and the Port of Bellingham, Martin Associates conducted a separate Economic Impact of the commercial fishing vessels using the Port s Squalicum and Blaine Marinas. The Economic Impact of the commercial fishing fleet is a stand-alone report and cannot be added to the Port of Bellingham Economic Impact Study since double counting would occur with cold storage, fish processing, vessel spending, and marina operations. The Port of Bellingham is an ideal base for a commercial fishing fleet. Bellingham s key geographic location makes the waters of the Puget Sound, Southeast Alaska, and waters off the Pacific Northwest of the United States very accessible to the commercial fishing fleet based in Bellingham. Squalicum and Blaine marinas operated and managed by the Port of Bellingham, offer slips and amenities to the commercial fishing fleet fishing the adjacent waters. In 2013, 162 fishing boats were moored at Squalicum and Blaine marinas. Another 150 fishing vessels moored at the Port s facilities throughout the year as a base for a particular fishing season, access to fishing grounds, and/or for vessel repairs and maintenance. While tied-up at Port of Bellingham marinas, these 162 based vessels and 150 transient vessels make numerous purchases of goods and services from local firms. Such purchases include expenditures for shipyard repair services, painting, electronic equipment, engine and propulsion services, fishing gear, packaging material, fuel, insurance, legal services, and ship stores (food and supplies for the crew). These purchases by the fishing fleet in turn support local jobs with shipyards, ship chandlers, electronics retailers, marine engine specialists, local retail and grocery stores, ship brokers, insurance brokers and hardware stores. To quantify this economic impact, Martin Associates modified our current economic impact model for the Port of Bellingham to translate the local purchases and economic activity of the fishing vessels moored at the Port s marinas, as well as the transient commercial fishing vessels visiting the Port s marinas into jobs, income, business revenue and tax revenues. 1 It is to be emphasized that the Washington based fishing fleet uses other terminals and moorings throughout Southeast Alaska, the West Coast and Puget Sound areas. In addition to Bellingham, purchases and offloads by the fleet occur in these other geographic locations. The purpose of this impact analysis is to focus only on the impacts generated by the fleet using Port of Bellingham marinas. As a result, the impacts of the fishing fleet measured in this report are only a subset of the total economic impacts generated by the fishing industry on the West Coast and the Puget Sound region. To estimate the economic impacts generated by the commercial fishing fleet using Port of Bellingham marinas, the various types of fishing vessels moored at the marina were profiled. It is necessary to estimate the economic impacts by type of vessel, since each type of fishing boat has a very different expenditure profile, which is a function of such factors as: 1 The Economic Impacts of the Port of Bellingham, Prepared for the Port of Bellingham, by Martin Associates, November 21, 2013. Page 1

The size of the boat; Designed purpose of the vessel -- a catcher boat which catches fish and delivers the catch to on-shore or off-shore processors, a tender -- which services the fishing fleet with supplies and ship stores, or a factory ship or processor -- which processes fish at sea; Type of fishing gear used, such as the use of longlines versus nets versus pots; and Where the fishing is done - in local or distant waters. The fishing fleet based at the Port of Bellingham s marinas consists of the following types of vessels: Purse seine vessels, which typically fish for salmon, squid, sardines and herring using a purse seine net; Gillnet boats, which use gillnets for salmon fishing; Longline vessels, which fish for groundfish such as halibut and black cod using a hook and line gear; Crab boats, which include crab catchers using crab pots; Catcher trawlers, which catch ground fish of all types by dragging a net; and Tenders, which transport fish from fishing vessels in the Puget Sound and Southeast Alaska to shore side processors. A log of commercial fishing vessels moored at the Port of Bellingham harbors during 2013 was entered in a spreadsheet and reviewed by commercial fishers. The log identified vessels as transient or resident and large or small. In 2013, 312 fishing vessels moored at the Port s marinas. The Working Waterfront Coalition members sorted through the log and assigned each vessel by type of fishing vessel. Approximately 205 vessels were identifiable by the fishers and coded. The balance was small vessels the WWC had assigned randomly, one half gill netters/crabbers, one quarter gill netters and one quarter crabbers. Exhibit I shows the type of fishing vessels based at Squalicum and Blaine marinas by type of fishing vessel. Gill Netters are the most common type of fishing vessel, both home port and transient vessels, based at Port of Bellingham Marina s. Purse Seiners are the second most common type of fishing vessel followed by Crabbers. This is a direct Page 2

correlation to the fish species located in the adjacent waters of the Puget Sound, Southeast Alaska and waters off Washington, Oregon and Northern California. Exhibit I Type of Fishing Vessels Type of Vessel Home Port Transient Total Crabber 20 31 51 Gill Netter 74 54 128 Long Liner 3 7 10 Purse Seiner 42 37 79 Shrimp 0 2 2 Tender 10 15 25 Trawler 8 3 11 Unidentified 5 1 6 Total 162 150 312 Many of these vessels change gear and equipment throughout the year to fish various species in the Puget Sound, Southeast Alaska, and waters off the Pacific Northwest Coast of the United States. To estimate the expenditures by each type of vessel surveys were mailed to local fishing boat owners identified in the commercial fishing vessel log derived by the Port of Bellingham, Jim Kyle and the Working Waterfront Coalition. In person interviews with individual boat operators were also conducted. Data provided by the fishing fleet was combined with internal Martin Associates interviews with the various trade associations representing the types of boats operating in the Pacific Northwest to translate these local purchases into economic impacts. Exhibit II represents average annual expenditures of an example purse seine vessel based at Squalicum and Blaine marinas in 2013. The vessel expenditure profiles were developed from surveys completed by local fishing vessel owners during the data collection process. The vessel owners reported type of vessel and annual expenditures for shipyards, electronics, gear, ship stores, etc. Exhibit II represents actual annual expenditures for an example purse seine vessel moored in Bellingham. The average purse seine vessel spends roughly $120 thousand dollars per year. Exhibit II illustrates the share of vessel expenses by category. These expenditures were then combined with jobs to value of sales ratios in corresponding supplying industries to estimate the number of local direct jobs supported by the vessels based at the Port s marinas. Added to these direct jobs are the number of crew employed by the fleet, ship brokers and insurance brokers providing services to the fishermen at the marina and employees with shore-side fish processing and cold storage. Several of the direct jobs with fish processors, cold storage and other marine trades are included in the 2013 Port of Bellingham Economic Impact Study, prepared by Martin Associates for the Port of Bellingham. It is to be emphasized the economic impact results of the commercial fishing report and Port of Bellingham Economic Impact Study cannot be added together since it would result in double counting. Page 3

Exhibit II Annual Expenditures in Bellingham for an example Purse Seine Vessel SHIPYARD/HAULOUT $19,123 $24,186 ELECTRONICS $21,850 $11,424 $15,400 $8,806 $19,088 ENGINE REPAIR/PROPULSION GEAR/FACTORY EQUIPMENT SHIP STORES INSURANCE FUEL Commercial fishing activity contributes to the local and regional economy by generating business revenue to the fishing vessels and local firms providing services to the commercial fleet. These firms, in turn, provide employment and income to individuals, and pay taxes to state and local governments. Exhibit III, below, shows how commercial fishing activity at the Port of Bellingham s Squalicum and Blaine marinas generate impacts throughout the local economy. As this exhibit indicates, the impacts of commercial fishing, on a local economy cannot be reduced to a single number, but instead, the Port s commercial fishing activity creates several impacts. These are the revenue impact, employment impact, personal income impact, and tax impact. These impacts are non-additive. For example, the income impact is a part of the revenue impact, and adding these impacts together would result in double counting. Exhibit III shows graphically how the Port of Bellingham s commercial fishing fleet generates the four impacts. Page 4

Exhibit III Flow of Economic Impacts Generated by the Port of Bellingham Commercial Fishing Activity Port of Bellingham Commercial Fishing Activity Business Revenue $320 million Payroll $94.5 million Retained Earnings, Dividends and Investments Local Purchases $13.3 million Direct Jobs 1,781 Re-Spending $67.7 million Induced Jobs 870 Indirect Jobs 165 State and Local Taxes $16 million Table I presents the economic impacts generated by the Port of Bellingham commercial fishing activity. Table I Economic Impacts of Port of Bellingham Commercial Fishing PORT OF BELLINGHAM COMMERCIAL FISHING Jobs Direct 1,781 Induced 870 Indirect 165 Total Jobs 2,816 Personal Income ($1,000) Direct $94,556 Induced $67,683 Indirect $7,602 Total $169,842 Business Revenue ($1,000) $320,059 Local Purchases ($1,000) $13,330 State and Local Taxes ($1,000) $15,965 Note: Totals may not add due to rounding *Revenue excludes value of the catch Page 5

In 2013, commercial fishing activity at Squalicum and Blaine marinas generated the following impacts: 1,781 direct jobs, including full-time equivalent jobs with the fishing crew based at the Squalicum and Blaine marinas, jobs with local shipyards, chandlers, engine/propulsion repair shops, retail stores, suppliers of fishing gear, insurance brokers, public restaurants, and retail stores and fishing processing, storage and distribution. As the result of purchases by these 1,781 directly generated jobs, an additional 870 induced jobs are created in the local economy. As the result of $13.3 million of local purchases by the firms located at Port of Bellingham marinas, an additional 165 indirect jobs were created in the local economy. The 1,781 direct job holders earned $94.5 million in direct wages and salaries. As the result of re-spending of this income, an additional $67.7 million of personal income and consumption expenditures were generated. The 165 indirect jobs received $7.6 million in indirect wages and salaries. Local businesses received $320 million of revenue from the purchases by the fishing fleet at the Port of Bellingham marinas, as well as from retail sales. This does not include the landed value of the fish catch. State and local governments received nearly $16 million of tax revenue from the activity generated by the commercial fishing fleet using the Port of Bellingham marinas. Because of the diversity of commercial fishing-associated activity in Bellingham, the distribution of the direct job impacts created by type of activity is shown in Exhibit IV. As this exhibit demonstrates, sixty five percent of the 1,802 direct jobs are held by shore-side fish processing, cold storage and distribution, followed by crew and support services including local firms supplying support services to the fleet based at Squalicum and Blaine Marinas, such as jobs with shipyards/engine propulsion companies, ship chandlers and equipment supply firms. The balance of the jobs are with visitor impacts generated by transient and visiting fishing vessels using Port of Bellingham Marinas for moorage or offloading fish to the processors located in Bellingham. Page 6

Exhibit IV Distribution of the Direct Jobs Generated by Port of Bellingham Commercial Fishing 16 ; 1% 77 ; 4% 1,173; 65% 515 ; 29% Ship Spending Crew Processing Visitor Industry Page 7