ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION RESULTING FROM OLIVE OIL PRODUCTION

Similar documents
Table 1.1: Typical Characteristics of Anaerobically Digested Wastewater

WASTEWATER TREATMENT

GUIDELINES FOR LEACHATE CONTROL

WASTEWATER TREATMENT OBJECTIVES

1993 Food Industry Environmental Conference SURVEY OF WATER USE IN THE CALIFORNIA FOOD PROCESSING INDUSTRY

Laboratory analysis for wastewater treatment, industrial monitoring, and environmental protection

1.3 Wastewater and Ambient Water Quality

Saudi Aramco Project Development

OFFICE OF LICENSING & GUIDANCE

City of Mebane Wastewater Collection and Treatment Facility

On-site Treatmentt for Domestic Wastewater in Thailand Suwanna. K. Boontanon Mahidol Univ. 2

BY-LAW CONCERNING DISCHARGES AT PURIFICATION WORKS ON THE TERRITORY OF THE URBAN AGGLOMERATION OF MONTRÉAL

Brewery Wastewater: 2010 Water and Wastewater Conference Page 1

Project website:

COD/BOD 5 Reduction with ROTAMAT Fine and Micro Screens

Glossary of Wastewater Terms

Unit 1. Physical, chemical and biological Characteristics of Wastewater

NAJAFGARH DRAIN-SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS

Toxic Municipal Waste Water Treatment

Treatment of dairy wastewater by natural coagulants

Pursuant to Department of Environmental Protection Rules Chapter 555, effective March 9, 2009

Package Treatment Plant Policy and Procedure

Water and Wastewater. Sample Collection and Analysis

Nutrient Removal at Wastewater Treatment Facilities. Nitrogen and Phosphorus. Gary M. Grey HydroQual, Inc X 7167

FACT SHEET STATEMENT OF BASIS HARLEY DOME 1 PRODUCED WATER TREATMENT FACILITY UPDES PERMIT NUMBER: UT NEW PERMIT MINOR INDUSTRIAL

Presented by Paul Krauth Utah DEQ. Salt Lake Countywide Watershed Symposium October 28-29, 2008

Rehabilitation of Wastewater Treatment Plant of Sakhnin City in Israel by Using Advanced Technologies

Dairy Processing Methods to Reduce Water Use and Liquid Waste Load. Kent D. Rausch Extension Specialist, Food Engineering

Report Naga City: Septage treatment and wastewater concept for Del Rosario

To meet our acceptance criteria, we may require you to partially treat your wastewater before it discharges to sewer.

Phosphorus Removal in Wastewater Treatment

SYNERGISTIC APPLICATION OF ADVANCED PRIMARY AND SECONDARY WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS

Environmental Regulations & Best Management Practices CARPET CLEANING OPERATIONS. Carpet Cleaning Operations in the Capital Regional District

A SOIL TESTING SERVICE FOR FARMERS IN THAILAND, USING MOBILE LABORATORIES

PROPAK AquaBio Complete Water Restoration Systems

Recommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching

Planning, Designing, Monitoring and Inspection of Wastewater Treatment Systems of Industries

MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY TREATING OILY WASTEWATER FOR REUSE

Physico-chemical Characterization of Distillery Effluent and its Dilution Effect at Different Levels

Fats, Oils, and Grease Best Management Practices Manual

Natural and Advanced Treatment Systems for Wastewater Management at Municipal Solid Waste Disposal Site in Developing Countries

City of Lakeland s Wetlands Treatment System An Overview

Municipal Solid Waste Used as Bioethanol Sources and its Related Environmental Impacts

Advanced Treatment of Hazardous Wastes(1) Advanced Treatment of Hazardous Wastes(2) Advanced Environmental Chemistry. Design of Solid Waste Landfill

Provided below is a description of the processes generating wastewater in a poultry plant and a typical pretreatment and full treatment system.

Biological Drain Maintenance Systems

Papapostolou 1, E. Kondili 1, J.K. Kaldellis 2

How To Monitor Toxicity In Water

Application Form 2E. Facilities Which Do Not Discharge Process Wastewater

GUIDELINE 39 SEPTAGE, SUMP AND PIT WASTE, AND RESTAURANT GREASE TRAP WASTE MANAGEMENT

This Questionnaire is divided into 8 sections referring to different capacity areas on the safe use of wastewater in agriculture:

Total Suspended Solids Total Dissolved Solids Hardness

Ground Water Contamination by Leachate

research highlight Remote Monitoring and Control of On-Site Wastewater Treatment, Recycling, and Reuse Systems

In-Situ Remediation of Estero de Paco by the Application of Local Organo Minerals

A NOVEL ION-EXCHANGE/ELECTROCHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY FOR THE TREATMENT OF AMMONIA IN WASTEWATER

Environmetric Data Interpretation to Assess Surface Water Quality

Lance DeClue, REHS Environmental Health Specialist II County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES

An introduction to EPAS

Module 16: The Activated Sludge Process - Part II Instructor Guide Answer Key

STORMWATER MONITORING: POLLUTANTS, SOURCES, AND SOLUTIONS

THE NEW NSF 350 AND 350-1

Hebron Regional Wastewater Treatment Facilities

Regulating Water Pollution in Ontario s Municipalities Windsor s Sewer Use By-law Prepared by Derek Coronado

SAMPLE CHAPTERS UNESCO EOLSS SURFACE WATER MONITORING. Masanori Ando Musashino University, Japan

Anish Jantrania (photo) and Allen Knapp

Wastewater characteristics

Overview of Best Available Technologies for Onsite Septic Systems and Management Considerations Presentation to NAHB

Development of Advanced Wastewater Treatment and Reclamation System

REMOVAL OF PHOSPHATE FROM WASTEWATER USING LOW-COST ADSORBENTS

CENTRAL ARIZONA SALINITY STUDY ---- Phase I. Technical Appendix O. Municipal TDS Research

ULUDAĞ UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING ACADEMIC YEAR INSTITUTE REQUIRED COURSES

MARICOPA COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CODE CHAPTER II SEWAGE AND WASTES SECTION 8

Site Visit Report. MEAT PROCESSING FACILITY COD Reduction. Industrial Assistance Section Assessment Team

Experts Review of Aerobic Treatment Unit Operation and Maintenance. Bruce Lesikar Texas AgriLife Extension Service

MALAYSIA S REQUIREMENTS ON INDUSTRIAL EFFLUENT TREATMENT SYSTEMS -The WEPA Workshop and Annual Meeting February 2013 Siem Reap, Combodiaby

Phosphorus Removal. Wastewater Treatment


INFORMATION SHEET ORDER NO. R XXXX TRIANGLE ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. FLORIN ROAD AGGREGATE PLANT SACRAMENTO COUNTY

BALANCING REDOX EQUATIONS. Each redox equation contains two parts -- the oxidation and reduction parts. Each is balanced separately.

Wastewater Production, Treatment, and Use in Malaysia

TREATMENT OF SANITARY SEWER OVERFLOW

Characterizing Beauty Salon Wastewater for the Purpose of Regulating Onsite Disposal Systems

El Paso Water Utilities Public Service Board. Application for Renewal Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit

1.2. Structure and contents of the waste water statistics

Choosing an Effluent Treatment Plant

A HOMEOWNERS GUIDE ON-SITE SEWAGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

Collection and disposal of wastewater

Application for Controlled Trade Waste Discharge Approval

CENTRAL POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD Parivesh Bhawan, East Arjun Nagar Delhi

Holistic Aeration and Chemical Optimization Saves Big Money from 1 MGD to 600 MGD. Trevor Ghylin, PE PhD

Sewerage Management System for Reduction of River Pollution

National Precast Concrete Association

OPTIMIZING BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL FROM AN SBR SYSTEM MIDDLEBURY, VT. Paul Klebs, Senior Applications Engineer Aqua-Aerobic Systems, Inc.

Maine Department of Environmental Protection Program Guidance On Combined Sewer Overflow Facility Plans

Facility Classification Standards

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES IN THE RENDERING INDUSTRY. Gregory L. Sindt, P.E. Environmental Engineer Bolton and Menk, Inc.

GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON FOR WATER & WASTEWATER TREATMENT

DAIRY WASTEWATER-A CASE STUDY

Transcription:

544 Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 15 (No 6) 29, 544-551 Agricultural Academy ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION RESULTING FROM OLIVE OIL PRODUCTION A. AL-KHATIB 1, F. AQRA 1 *, M. AL-JABARI 1, N. YAGHI 1, S. BASHEER 2, I. SABBAH 2, B. AL-HAYEK 3 and M. MOSA 3 1 Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, Hebron University, P.O. Box, 4, Hebron, West Bank, Palestine 2 R&D Center, the Galilee Society, P.O. BOX 437, Shefa-Amr 22, Israel 3 Royal Scientific Society, P.O.Box 1438, Al-Jubaiha 11941, Amman, Jordan Abstract AL-KHATIB, A., F. AQRA, M. AL-JABARI, N. YAGHI, S. BASHEER, I. SABBAH, B. AL-HAYEK and M. MOSA, 29. Environmental pollution resulting from olive oil production. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 15: 544-551 The level of environmental impact of olive oil production in Palestine is evaluated. The evaluation method is based on conducting a local survey; after designing a questionnaire covering the basic aspects that includes oil production yield, water consumptions in olive washing and in oil recovery, wastewater generation relative to olive processed and oil generated, and solid waste generation. The data were collected from 92 local olive oil mills, which were analyzed and organized according to the investigated parameters, and categorized according to local selected areas in the West Bank such as Hebron (South), Nablus (middle) and Jenine (North). The results reveal local variations in most of the investigated parameters due to variations in the type of olive produced. The south olives are found to contain larger solid content than those in the north, resulting in lower oil yield and higher solid generation per ton of olive produced. Key words: olives, olive oil, oil yield, solid waste, water consumption, wastewater Introduction Annually, approximately 1.8x1 6 tons of olive oil is produced worldwide, with a majority being produced in the Mediterranean basin (Paredson, 1999), (Tamburino, 1999). Treatability of olive mill wastewater has been investigating using respirometric method (Kiril, 28). In Palestine, olive and olive oil production is an important source of income for a considerable sector of farmers. From Agricultural * Email: fathiaqra@hotmail.com prospective, olives and their oil have major contributions in the Palestinian economy. Olive farms covers almost half of the cultivated area in The West Bank, and oil production contributes by around 28.7% of the agriculture domestic income, there are about 246 olive mills in The West Bank (Palestinian international information, 25). The operations of these mills are spilt between modern and traditional models. Naturally, olive mills are generally situated close to olive orchards.

Environmental Pollution Resulting from Olive Oil Production 545 The Palestinian Nation Information Center published the overall statistical information about the number of mills, and total amounts of olive and olive oil produced in The West Bank and Gaza between the years 1998 to 22. No recent data beyond 22 are available which shows that there is a slight change in the overall percentage oil yield from year to year. Generally extraction of oil is carried out either by continuous or discontinuous processes, and both methods generate wastewater, which consists of the water contained in olive fruit, the added water required for washing the fruit, and for the centrifugation process. With continuous process, the average amount of olive mill wastewater (OMW) is 1.2-1.8 m 3 / ton of olives, while with discontinuous process; it is only.4 -.5 m 3 / ton of olives (Tomati, 1992). The color of wastewater produced in both methods is usually black or reddish black due to the presence of phenolic compounds. The typical composition of OMW includes water (83%), organic compounds (15%), and inorganic chemicals (about 2%). The organic load in OMW is considered one of the highest of all concentrated effluents, being 1-15 times higher than the organic load of domestic wastewater. In general, OMW produced in discontinuous mills contains higher organic load than those generated in continuous mills. OMW is acidic, and contains high concentration of total suspended solids (TSS), total dissolved solids (TDS), phenols, and other organic matter. The organic content is characterized by high levels of chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), and very high concentration of fat, oil, and grease (FOG) (Jordanian Ministry of Agriculture, 1998). No stander for OMW discharge disposal is currently imposed in Palestine, but the Jordanian standards are adopted (Table 1) (Jordanian ministry of agriculture 1998), (Jordanian standard report no.22, 1991) and (water authority law no. 18, 1988). The BOD and COD maximum concentrations in OMW reach 1, and 22, mg/l, respectively. The OMW consist toxic organic materials such as sugars, tannins, polyphenols, polyalcohols, pectins, proteins, and lipids (Kiritsakis, 1991). Ecological stabilization and detoxification of their effects are expensive and ineffective (Borja, 1992) and (Martin, 1995). Currently, there is no appropriate method applied for treating OMW in Palestine; it is usually disposed of in sewage systems and/or cesspools in addition to being discharged into water streams and valleys in the region. Due to the presence of high load of toxic organic compounds, the improper discharge of OMW causes the disruption of biological activities in domestic wastewater ponds. This creates a strong and unpleasant odor due to aerobic digestion in open air systems, and poses a threat to surface and groundwater (Hamdi, 1992) and (Sorlini, 1986). The disposal of OMW causes serious environmental problems during the olive harvest season. In addition to wastewater generation, a large amount of solid waste is generated. This emphasizes the environmental concerns associated with olive oil production and highlights the need for this study. This paper evaluates the level of environmental impact of olive oil production in Palestine through conducting a survey in the West Bank. A questionnaire covering the basic aspects of the paper was designed, the investigated parameters include: yield of oil from olives, water consumptions in olive washing and in oil production, wastewater generation, solid waste generation. Material and Method During survey activity, the West Bank was under Military closer. The number of olive mills operating in The West Bank and Gaza during the season (21-22) was about 194 mills, and some of them were closed due to political situation and there were about 1 mills in Gaza which could not be reached. Thus, 92 olive mills through out The West Bank could be reached and included in this survey. The obtained data were analyzed and organized according to the investigated parameters and then categorized according to local areas in the West Bank; Hebron (south), Nablus (middle) and Jenine (North). Experimental work was performed for obtaining typical characteristics of OMW in Palestine, by ob-

546 A. Al-Khatib, F. Aqra, M. Al-Jabari, N. Yaghi, S. Basheer, I. Sabbah, B. Al-Hayek and M. Mosa Table 1 Characteristics of OMW in Jordan and comparison with Jordanian standards and regulations for OMW [6-8] Parameter Unit OMW Characteristics Min.-Max. Maximum Allowable Limit- Jordanian Standards Disposal to wades and rivers Reuse for irrigation Discharge to sanitary systems ph SU 5.48-5.91 6.8-9. 6.5-8.4 5.5-9.5 COD mg/l 78536-1696 15 undetermined 21 BOD 5 mg/l 23248-63271 5 undetermined 8 TSS mg/l 1427-46188 5 1 11 TDS mg/l 16984-8355 3 2 FOG mg/l 28-13118 5 5 5 Phenol mg/l 1739-4432.2.2 1 taining samples from a representative olive mill at three intervals of the harvest season (beginning, middle and end of season). The major characteristic parameters of the wastewater are determined using the standard tests. These include ph, chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD 5 ), total suspended solids (TSS), total dissolved solids (TDS), concentration of fat, oil, and grease (FOG), phenols, electric conductivity (EC) total Phosphorus (T-P) and total Kejndal nitrogen (Tkj-N). Results and Discussion Analysis of the overall data published by the Palestinian National Information Center provides (Figure 1) oil yield (defined as percentage of amount of oil produced per amount of olive processed), which compares the amount of olives and olive oil produced in various parts of The West Bank and the overall yield in 22? Jenine produced the largest amounts of olives and olive oil. There are some variations in the overall yield between the locations. The estimated average overall yield was 22.3%. Obviously, olives and olive oil production is more popular in the north areas, and the oil yield is higher than that in the south The obtained fitting R 2 values are almost above.99. The oil yield (%Oil/Olive) has an average value of 23.7%, which is in accordance with the previous reports, with a difference of 1.4%. Both the linearity of the data and the closeness of the obtained yield to that estimated previously confirm the validity of the conducted survey. This emphasis the fact that the oil yield in Hebron (south) is lower than that in the middle or north (Jenine and Nablus). Similar to oil yield data, the obtained fitting R 2 values are high (almost above.99) confirming linearity. The fraction of solid waste (quantity of solid waste produced per quantity of processed olives) has an average value of.4. Relatively, olive mills in Hebron area produces larger fraction of solid waste compared to those in the north areas. While as they provide lower oil yield. In olive mills, wastewater is generated from various sources including water coming from olives and water used for processing (water consumption). The latest source comes from two different steps; washing of olives and extraction of oil. The designed questionnaire enabled us together data for total wastewater, water used for washing and water used in extraction. The summation of water used for washing and extraction provided data for water consumption, while the difference between total wastewater and water consumption provided data for water coming from fruit. The obtained results for the various forms of water are plotted against quantity of processed olives and presented in Figures 2, 3 and 4.

Environmental Pollution Resulting from Olive Oil Production 547 Ton 75 6 45 3 15 22.4% 23.5% 23.6% 17.2% Jenine Nablus Hebron Rest Local Area Amount of Olive Amount of oil Oil yeild Water from Olive m3 1 8 6 4 2 5 1 15 2 25 Quantity of Processed olive (Ton) Hebron Jenine Nablus Fig. 1. Comparison of the amount of olives and olive oil produced in various parts of The West Bank and Gaza and the overall oil yield in the year 22 Fig. 2. Quantity of water coming from olive fruit versus quantity of processed olives for data from Hebron (triangles), Nablus (circles) and Jenine (diamonds) Table 2 Results of linear curve fitting for data of water from olive fruit obtained from the conducted survey Local area Fitting line Fitting R 2 Fraction of water coming from olive fruits Hebron Y=.411 X.9983.411 Nablus Y=.382 X.9991.382 Jenine Y=.41 X.9992.41 All data as one plot (Average) Y=.398 X.9988.398 Figure 2 represents the obtained data of water coming from olive fruit versus quantity of processed olives, in Hebron, Nablus and Jenine. Obviously, the general trend is linear, the slope of which provides a representative value of the fraction of water content in the olive fruits. Table 2 provides the results of linear curve fitting for these data. Similar to both oil yield and solid fraction, the obtained fitting R 2 values are all above.99. Relatively, olives in Hebron area contain slightly larger fraction of water than those in the north areas. In general, the fraction of water content in olive (quantity of water from olive fruit per quantity of processed olives) has an average value of nearly.4. Table 3 summarizes the obtained characteristics of olives. From mass balance, the summation of the fractional oil yield, the fractional solid waste and the fractional water content in olives should be 1.. With the obtained average values, the sum is 1.38 with percentage error of 3.8 %. Thus, these average values provide representative values for olives characteristic in Palestine with reasonable accuracy. Figure 3 represents water consumption (for washing and extraction of oil) versus quantity of processed olive. Similar to other parameter, the tend is linear. Using linear curve fitting for these data provides fitting values (R 2 ) all above.99 as listed in Table 4. The slope represents the average value of water consumption per ton of processed olives. The average value is 1.193 m 3 /ton. This value is relatively high, and it is of special concern in Palestine where water resources are very limited. Water consumption shall be minimized not only to reduce the generated wastewater, but also to reduce fresh water demand. This would require a technical review for operation of olive mills. The average value is nearly 1.7 m 3 wastewater/ ton olives. This value is within the range of 1.2-1.8 m 3 /ton published in the literature as the range of OMW

548 A. Al-Khatib, F. Aqra, M. Al-Jabari, N. Yaghi, S. Basheer, I. Sabbah, B. Al-Hayek and M. Mosa Table 3 Summary of typical olive characteristics in Palestine Local area Fraction of oil Fraction of solid Fraction of water Total Hebron.219.429.414 1.62 Nablus.248.399.382 1.29 Jenine.243.379.41 1.23 Average.237.43.398 1.38 Table 4 Results of linear curve fitting for water consumption data Local area Fitting line Fitting R 2 Fraction of consumption water Hebron Y=1.23X.997 1.23 Nablus Y=1.188X.9945 1.188 Jenine Y=1.155X.999 1.155 All data as one plot (Average) Y=1.191X.9947 1.191 Water consumption (M3) 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 5 1 15 Quantity of processed olive (Ton) Hebron Jenine Nablus Fig. 3. Quantity of consumption water versus quantity of processed olives for data from Hebron (triangles), Nablus (circles) and Jenine (diamonds) for continuous processes. For discontinuous processes, the range is.4 -.5 m 3 /ton. In Palestine, as indicated in the introduction, the operations are split between continuous and discontinuous processes. However, the average value of the volume of OMW in Palatine fits within the range for continuous processes (which generates almost three times more wastewater than discontinuous processes). It is also more close to the maximum limit of that range. Consequently, it is important to perform technical review for the implemented technology and procedures followed in Palestinian olive mill to reduce the rate of wastewater generation. Table 5 summarizes the results for water consumption and wastewater. In Hebron area, although the levels of production of olives and olive oil are lower than those in the north, both water consumption levels and the total wastewater levels are higher than those in north areas. This indicates that the environmental concerns in Hebron are still considerable. Figure 4 indicates that washing water in Hebron is comparable to that in north area. Thus, the rise in the total wastewater in Hebron comes from the high relative water content and high level of water used for extraction. Figure 5 presents plots of the total wastewater versus quantity of produced oil. Obviously, the curve for Hebron is above the other two curves for Jenine and Nablus. In addition to the previous reasoning regarding wastewater, the oil yield is lower, which contributes in raising this curve above the other ones. The results of the experimental work for the obtained typical characteristics of olive mills wastewater are tabulated in Table 6. The obtained values at three intervals (beginning, middle and end of the harvest season) are listed and compared to the Jordanian stan-

Environmental Pollution Resulting From Olive Oil Production 549 Table 5 Summary of results of wastewater from olive mills Local area Water Water coming Total consumption (*) from olive (*) wastewater (*) Hebron 1 23.411 1.641 Nablus 1 188.382 1.57 Jenine 1 155.41 1.556 All data as one plot (Average) 1 191.398 1.589 (*) m 3 water / ton olives 35 12 Washing water m3 3 25 2 15 1 5 5 1 15 Quantity of processed olives (Ton) Hebron Jenine Nablus Water Consumptio 3 1 8 6 4 2 1 2 3 4 5 Quantity of produced oil (Ton) Hebron Jenine Nablus Fig. 4. Quantity of washing water versus quantity of processed olive for data from Hebron (triangles), Nablus (circles) and Jenine (diamonds) dards for OMW for discharge to sanitary systems. The obtained results indicate that there are some variations forms time to time during the season However; the investigation of these variations requires more extensive analysis and larger amount of data which is the subject of a subsequent paper by the authors. In this paper, the average values for the investigated characteristic parameters are considered. Obviously, other than the ph-value, other comparable values are all above the permitted values and thus the discharge of such OMW violates these standards and shall receive sufficient attention from authorities to encounter the environmental problem. Currently, the authors of this paper formulate a research team for demonstrating the applicability of Upper Flow Anaerobic Sludge Blenkt for minimizing the environmental impacts of OMW. A pilot plant is established as demonstration Fig. 5. Quantity of total wastewater versus quantity of produced oil for data from Hebron (triangles), Nablus (circles) and Jenine (diamonds) project funded by USAID, and is functioning well. Comparing these obtained data with the published data (from Jordan) as tabulated in Table 1, indicates that the chosen olive mill generates wastewater with characteristics within the range of characteristics of OMW in Jordan. Conclusion This is paper highlight the environmental concerns associated with olive oil production in Palestine. The conduct survey reveals that there are local variations in the investigated parameters due to variations in the types of olives. Oil and water content in olives are dependent on location. The olives in the south are found to contain larger solid content than those in either middle or north, resulting in lower oil yield and

55 A. Al-Khatib, F. Aqra, M. Al-Jabari, N. Yaghi, S. Basheer, I. Sabbah, B. Al-Hayek and M. Mosa Table 6 Experimental results of OMW characteristics for sample obtained at the beginning, middle and the end of harvest season (22) Maximum Allowable Value Parameter Unit Limit- Jordanian Standards Beginning Middle End Average (Discharge to sanitary systems) ph SU 4.8 5.8 5.1 4.99 5.5-9.5 COD Mg/L 7121 619 6815 678.7 11 BOD 5 Mg/L 88535 98882 19582 98999.7 21 TSS Mg/L 42667 4568 48527 45624.7 8 TDS Mg/L 11271 17335 22285 16963.7 FOG Mg/L 3963 27437 39138 35212.7 5 Phenol Mg/L 3361 3363 4466 373 1 EC μs/cm 287 198 228 237.7 T-P Mg/L 648 348 587 527.7 Tkj-N Mg/L 357 387 334 3149.3 higher solid generation per ton of olive produced. The overall results indicate that the oil yield is nearly 23.7%, the fractional solid waste generation is nearly.4 while the remaining balance is nearly the water content in the olive fruit. A representative value at 1.7 m 3 /ton for wastewater generation is found to be high compared to those values in other places of the world which requires technical review at the technology and operation of olive mills in Palestine. The characteristics of OMW are found to violate the standards for OMW which requires the attention of authorities. References Borja, R., A. Martin, R. Maestro, J. Alba and J. Fiestas, 1992. Enhancement of the Anaerobic Digestion of olive mill wastewater by the removal of phenolic inhibitors. Process Biochem., 27: 231-237. Hamdi, M., 1992. Toxicity and Biodegradability of Olive Mill Wastewater on Batch Anaerobic Digestion. Applied Biochem. Biotechnol., 37: 155-162. Jordanian Ministry of Agriculture. Annual report, 1998. Jordanian Standards No.22 Industrial Wastewater, 1991. Ministry of Trade and Industry, Department of Specification and Standards. Kiril, B., K. Kestioglu and M. Yalili, 28. Treatability of chemically treated of olive mill wastewater using respirometric method. Ekoloji, 17, 66: 39 46. Kiritsakis, A., 1991. Olive Oil AOCS. Champaign, Illiniois, Martin, V., R. Borja, V. Alonso, I. Garcia and C. Banks, 1995. Influence of different aerobic pretreatments on the kinetics of anaerobic digestion of olive mill wastewater. Water Research, 28: 489-495. Palestinian National Information Center, 25. (www.pnic.gov.ps) Paredes, C., J. Cegarra, A. Roig Sanchez Monedero and M. Bernal, 1999. Characterization of Olive mill wastewater (alpechin) and its sludge for agricultural purposes. Bioresource Technology, 67: 111-115. Sorlini, C., V. Andreoni, A. Farrari and G. Ranalli, 1986. The influence of some phenolic acid present in olive mill water and microbic groups for the methanogenesis. Seville, Spain.

Environmental Pollution Resulting From Olive Oil Production 551 Tamburino, V., S. Zimbone and P. Quattrone, 1999. Storage and land application of olive-oil wastewater. OLIVAE, 76: 36-45. Tomati, U. and E. Galli, 1992. The fertilizing value of wastewater from the olive processing industry. Dev Agric. Manage.for Ecol., 25: 117-126. Vlyssides, A., M. Loizidou, K. Gimouhopoulos and A. Zorpas, 1998. Olive oil processing waste production and their characterizing in relation to olive oil extraction methods. Fresenius Envir. Bull., 7: 38-313. Water Authority Law No.18, 1988. Disposal of Industrial and Commercial Wastewater to the Sewer Network, Jordan. Received November, 23, 28; accepted for printing September, 23, 29.