Research to Inform the Pennsylvania Outdoor Recreation Plan

Similar documents
TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page. Executive Summary

IDENTIFYING ISSUES WITH LOCAL RECREATION PROVIDERS FOR THE INDIANA SCORP

Outdoor Recreation in Florida:

Appendix C. Pennsylvania Outdoor Recreation Online Surveys

Rapid City Downtown Area Master Plan. Draft Plan Concepts April 2016

Moving Toward an Active Delaware Through Community Design

Mid-Atlantic Region. 418 miles 184 mi complete 73 mi in development 39 mi in public control 29 mi trail route identified 105 mi gap

Inter-agency communications and coordination in developing the SCORP should be substantially strengthened.

Town of Snowmass Village. PO Box Or Delivered To: 1 P a g e

Natural Assets as Economic Generators

Revising the Nantahala and Pisgah Land Management Plan Preliminary Need to Change the Existing Land Management Plan

Cobourg Tourism Asset Feasibility Study

*******VACANCY NOTICE******* WAYNE NATIONAL FOREST

The Snelling Community Park and Playground Renovation Project

6 Ways to Describe Your Community

PA Trees.org The Pennsylvania Tree Resource Guide Managing Community Forests

How To Know What You Want To Know

Bolton Resource Management Tract Management Plan TRCA Delegation to Town of Caledon Council. July 8, 2014

Funding for Municipal Recreation Projects

III. Vision and Goals

Conducting Formative Research

One Major Six Concentrations. Department of Environmental Conservation University of Massachusetts Amherst

INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT FOR AGENCY PARTNERSHIPS: EXPLORING PERSONNEL PERCEPTION AND WEBSITE CONTENT

Natural Resource Management Profile

FINDING THE RISK IN RISK ASSESSMENTS NYSICA JULY 26, Presented by: Ken Shulman Internal Audit Director, New York State Insurance Fund

Urban Stream Restoration Defining the Full Benefits of a Project. Warren C. High MACTEC Engineering and Consulting

A Marketing Strategy for Urban & Community Forestry in the West

Strategic Positioning, Target Industry Assessment & Action Plan

Architectural Services

SWOT Analysis Summary City of Hayward

Public Opinions, Attitudes and Awareness Regarding Water in Colorado

This module introduces the use of informal career assessments and provides the student with an opportunity to use an interest and skills checklist.

Valuing Diversity. Cornerstones. 1. Diversity is about inclusion and engagement!

February 12, Water Docket Environmental Protection Agency Mailcode: 2822T 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460

Section 5: Conserve to Enhance Program Goals What is Conserve to Enhance All About?

Horseshoe Ranch Management Planning Process

IF THEN SURVEY RESULTS

National Travel Surveys in Finland

2013 Arkansas State Parks SCORP Survey

Council Strategic Plan squamish.ca

Executive Summary 1 About Oakland Zoo 2 Introducing California Trail 3 Site Plan 4 Demographics Analysis 5 Corporate Sponsor Opportunities 6

FY 2012 Competitive Resource Allocation National Guidance (revised )

An extraordinary launching point for nationally recognized programs

Marketing Plan. Achieving NECC Enrollment and Image Enhancement Goals. Supporting Existing College and Presidential Priorities Priorities 7/1/10

LIFE GO PARK. Project summary. Project LIFE12 INF/IT/000571

Appendix A: Contractor Survey

Funding Programs for Active Living. Lisa A. Cirill, M.S., Acting Chief California Center for Physical Activity California Department of Public Health

Goals, Strategies, and Tasks

Raleigh, North Carolina Wildlife Control Update

2010 Salida Community Priorities Survey Summary Results

Communications strategy refresh. January c:\documents and settings\mhln.snh\objcache\objects\a doc

Brook Trout Angling in Maine 2009 Survey Results

MT SCORP: Public Recreational Use Study 2012

Maryland s White-tail Hunting: Region A - Western Maryland

Lower Crooked Creek Watershed Conservation Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Digital Communications

Broward County Everglades Holiday Park. Gateway to the Everglades

Welcome to the future of Terwillegar Park a Unique Natural Park

Design Principle Social Inclusion

Urban Ecosystem Services Seattle s Urban Forest

THE ROLE OF MARKET RESEARCH IN THE MODERN SHOPPING CENTRE

Public Survey for Phase I

Kansas City, Missouri Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Boulevards Master Plan

Mainstreaming Cross-Cutting Outcomes: Gender Equality, Environmental Sustainability, Cultural Respect and Understanding. A Toolkit

Economic Development Element

COUNCIL CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL MASTER PLAN Committee Roles and Responsibilities

18 voting members 44 stakeholders 114 list. Senators: Wyden & Merkley Representative DeFazio

Mind on Statistics. Chapter 10

Park and Recreation Designs

Vision and Policies Comment:

Elk Valley Community Priorities Plan

key evaluation questions

Sowing the Seeds. Reconnecting London s Children with Nature

GCSE Business Studies

Graduate Entrepreneurial Intention in Turkey: Motivators and Obstacles. Nurdan Özarallı Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey

Austin Vision 2020 Recreation Center Survey

An Introduction to Organizational Maturity Assessment: Measuring Organizational Capabilities

APPENDIX C FUNDING PROGRAMS FOR IMPLEMENTATION

SWOT (STRENGTHS, WEAKNESS, OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS) ANALYSIS

Methodology. Insurance Study Part 1: The Changing Path to Purchase. Highlights

Needs and Equity in Prioritizing Sidewalk

Organizational Change: Managing the Human Side

Robert M. Ford Director of Technology Entry Plan

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL BANFF TRAIL MASTER PLAN. Issued by the Town of Banff. P.O. Box 1260, 110 Bear St. Banff, AB T1L 1A1

Entrepreneurship is attractive to many youth in the abstract. Key Messages. Data and methodology

customer-service equality standard

Sustainable Funding Mechanisms for Restoration Work

List Strategy. Optimizing Marketing Performance in Ascend2 research conducted in partnership with Return Path. returnpath.

Agriculture, Food & Natural Resources Career Cluster Wildlife Management

Introduction / Philosophy of Game Lodge Management

Look at Leisure. Participation. No. 50. Introduction

Design Sprint Methods. Playbook for start ups and designers

Position Profile: Enterprise Real Property (ERP) Program Manager

Chief Information Officer

Retaining College Talent and Spurring Job Growth

America in A ULI Survey of Views on Housing, Transportation, and Community FEDERAL REALTY INVESTMENT TRUST

Short-term. Action items that fall into this category need to take place over the next one to two years.

EDUCATION POST 2015 Parent Attitudes Survey

Evaluation: Designs and Approaches

Solvency II. PwC. *connected thinking. Solvency II GAP-analysis: practical experience (life and non-life business)

Transcription:

Research to Inform the 2014-2018 Pennsylvania Outdoor Recreation Plan

Today s Presentation and Activity 1. The why, who, what, how, and when of research to inform the Pennsylvania Outdoor Recreation Plan 2. Your input on the what Prioritizing topics, identifying your important question for the state-wide resident survey

Public Input A key part of the SCORP planning process Why? Ensures buy-in for future action The TAC is an important part of that public input Gathering different perspectives/interests Learning about initiatives or happenings in Pennsylvania as they relate to outdoor recreation

but Research is Public Input Too! Why? Helps us move beyond anecdotal claims Can support or refute assumptions or beliefs Can include analysis of existing data Can also gather updated/current data on public use, demand, preferences for OR Different states do this in different ways

Key data found in most plans Participation in Outdoor Recreation Satisfaction with Recreation Opportunities Needs Assessments (Facilities/Services) User/Non-user Characteristics Barriers to Participation, Facilitation Strategies Perceived Benefits of Outdoor Recreation Public Preferences and Attitudes

How is PA doing it for the current plan? Analyzing secondary or pre-existing data Recent and on-going outdoor recreation studies in PA Existing Data Sources (OIA, NSRE) Collecting primary or new data Random survey of Pennsylvanians (historic tradition) Survey of park and recreation providers (new this year)

Who is Doing This? Andrew Mowen, RPTM, Penn State Former Manager Research and Evaluation; Cleveland Metroparks Research Interests Park Benefits, Conservation Funding Currently working on a number of other DCNR projects Alan Graefe, RPTM, Penn State Lead Investigator for the 2009-2013 SCORP Research Lead Investigator for current PA-VUM Study (SF/SP) Bill Elmendorf, Ecosystems Sciences, Penn State Program Director Extension Urban Forestry Program Lead Investigator for the 2004-2008 SCORP Research

What is our Role? Synthesize information share general trends and data as they relate to SCORP themes Collect new information from PA residents providers Includes survey design, implementation, analysis, interpretation for inclusion into the plan. DCNR distills this information (along with your input) to set objectives, action steps for inclusion in the Plan.

The Last SCORP (2009-2013) Award Winning! A new approach taken by DCNR and other outdoor recreation stakeholders... More input (stakeholder interviews, TAC formation) Diverse research projects Focused on readability, dissemination, action steps, and responsibility for implementation A foundation for further action - The current SCORP

2008 Resident Survey - Last SCORP Integration of two studies/questions from the 2003 SCORP (into one instrument, approach) Gathered extensive data to satisfy multiple constituencies Strived for consistency with 2003 study content for the purpose of trend analysis

What are Pennsylvanians doing? Participation Rates for Most Popular Outdoor Recreation Activities

Where do people go for outdoor recreation?

Where do people go for outdoor recreation? Who s going where? Population Segment Urbanites Women Men Low Income Preferred Locations Local/Municipal Areas (50% of Philadelphians versus 29 % of overall population) Local/Municipal Areas (35% of women versus 25 % of men) State Parks, Forests, Game Lands (29% of men versus 24 % of women) Local/Municipal Areas (39% of under $20,000 versus 29 % of over $40,000)

Recreation Area and Facility Needs

What are the major area/facility needs? Who needs what types of facilities? Area/Facility Needs More bicycle paths and lanes More and improved pools and picnic areas Overnight recreation facilities (e.g. campgrounds, rental cabins, nature inns) Playgrounds and sports facilities Population Segment Residents of towns and suburbs Baby boomers (age 44-62) Philadelphians and residents of Northeast Pennsylvania Residents of Southeast Pennsylvania Urban residents

What are residents top priorities for funding recreation and conservation programs? Maintain existing park and recreation areas Protect wildlife habitat and conserve wild resources Percent Ranked Highest (#1) Priority Mean Importance* 17% 4.5 15% 4.4 Acquire and protect open space 14% 4.0 Restore damaged rivers and streams Build pedestrian and cycling paths between places of work, schools, and shopping areas 9% 4.4 7% 3.9 *Scale =1 to 5, Where 1 is Not at All Important and 5 is Extremely Important

Importance of Funding Trails and Greenways *Scale =1 to 5, Where 1 is Not at All Important and 5 is Extremely Important

How is this data used? Sets the stage for or supports major themes and goals of the plan supporting evidence Data has been useful for statewide initiatives Supporting programs, funding, prioritizing general activities Examples? - Prioritizing infrastructure maintenance, demonstrating public support for conservation initiatives and funding programs.

What about this year? Revisit questions from the last survey, how were they used since the plan was completed? What questions are important to keep for their own sake or for the purpose of trend analysis? not throwing out the baby with the bathwater What new questions/topics should be included in new survey?

DCNR Research Advisory Group Filter DCNR and stakeholder needs Provide input into study design Give and take between multiple perspectives Ensuring the timing works for the planning process having data before plan is written GOALS shorter survey, ensuring that information will be used now and in the future

Where are We Now? Revising and editing the resident survey Gathering input regarding your priorities for basic survey content Getting your suggestions for those burning outdoor recreation questions you may have of Pennsylvanians

Your Chance to Provide Input Not necessarily on the specific questionnaire design or survey procedures, but in prioritizing the topic/content gathered

Two Tasks 1. Prioritize most important survey topics/areas Dot exercise on the easels closest to you Refer to your handout before sticking it 2. If you had a chance to ask only one question on the resident survey, what would that be? Write down that question on your post-it note and place on the easel closest to you.

How will we use this information? Will guide our decision making concerning the essential questions to keep or focus on Will help us to develop further survey content or to revise/tweak existing questions We will be finalizing the survey in the next few weeks and want to be in the field by late Oct.

Thank You for Your Time Today Enjoy your Lunch! Contact Information: Andrew J. Mowen, Ph.D. Recreation, Park, and Tourism Management 704A Ford Building The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802 Phone: (814) 865-2102 E-mail: amowen@psu.edu