NFMV Enterprise Architecture Navy Full Motion Video
Setting the stage for an enterprise solution DOMAIN PROBLEM
July 16, 2012
What Happened? Small vessel turns towards USNS USNS USNS security forces fire on small vessel Outcome: 1 fatality 3 wounded International Incident Small vessel sighted @ 5000 yards
Official Report Released From U.S. Central Command
What if the ship was equipped with a dash cam capability? the ships cameras were networked into the dash cam array? the security teams cameras were networked too? IF we did have a ship dash cam
New Headlines
I remember that day Full Motion Video (FMV) Integrated Product Team (IPT) Working Group FMV IPT Conducted gap analysis of afloat systems related to FMV dissemination Urgent Operational Need (UON) from US Central Command for Visual Information to support first look reporting
NFMV Stakeholders and Team Stakeholders Mo Kane ICOP APM Mike O Sullivan FMV IPT Chair NFMV Team Mike Stewart IT Standards Juan Bautista Sydney Metzmaker Tara Rhodes
Current Architecture Issues Manual process to collect and disseminate video Bandwidth constraints impact ability to transmit quality video Video transmission limited single point of delivery
NFMV Architecture Goals
Solution to the domain problem NFMV ARCHITECTURE
Proposed Automated Video Distribution High level Operational View (OV 1) Multiple Organic SIP/FMV Sources SHF/UHF SIPRNET compressed SIP/FMV Dual UDP Stream (via SHF/EHF SATCOM) CGR Infrastructure Services QoS Higher HQ Even t Security Fleet MOC UVDS LEGEND Strike Group CDR 13 SIPR L/C/Ku SHF
NFMV Architecture NFMV Enterprise Architecture is designed using a Rich-Services SOA pattern and has been documented using DoDAF v2.02.
Governance Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution (PPBE) Defense Acquisition System (DAS) Operations (OPs) DoDAF 2.02 Supports 6 DoD processes Portfolio Managment (PM) Systems Engineering (SE) Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) Joint Warfighting Capability DoD Procedure Capability based requirement generation Combatant Commanders (COCOMs) Acquisition requirements and evaluation criteria Joint Capability Areas (JCAs) Future defense programs 2.0 Battlespace Awareness
Joint Capability Area (JCA): Battlespace Awareness JCA 2.0 Battlespace Awareness JCA 2.1 Planning and Direction JCA 2.2 Collection JCA 2.3 Processing/ Exploitation JCA 2.4 Analysis, Prediction and Production JCA 2.5 BA Data Dissemination and Relay JCA 2.1.1 Define & Prioritize Requirements JCA 2.2.1 Signals Collection JCA 2.3.1 Data Transformation JCA 2.4.1 Integration JCA 2.5.1 BA Data Transmission JCA 2.1.2 Develop Strategies JCA 2.2.2 Imagery Collection JCA 2.3.2 Information Categorization JCA 2.4.2 Evaluation JCA 2.5.2 BA Data Access JCA 2.1.3 Task and Monitor Resources JCA 2.2.3 Measurements and Signatures Collection JCA 2.3.3 Predict JCA 2.4.3 Interpretation JCA 2.1.4 Evaluation JCA 2.2.4 Human Based Collection JCA 2.3.4 Exploit JCA 2.4.4 Prediction JCA 2.4.5 Product Generation
NFMV Capability Taxonomy (CV 2) Video Distribution Collection Processing/ Exploitation Data Dissemination and Relay Imagery Collection Information Categorization Data Transformation Data Access Data Transmission Multi Source Video Collection Metadata Indexing Data Compression Data Management Data Conversion Storage Management Distribution Management Quality of Service
NFMV Services Policy Security Event Audit Logging CONVERSION TRANSFORMATION QOS SECURITY ENCRYPTION AUTHENTICATION CRITICAL VIDEO REQUEST LV VIDEO REQUEST DISSEMINATION CRITICAL VIDEO REQUEST LOCAL VIEWER REQUEST EVENT TRACE LOGGING LOG LEVELS Common Ground Receiver (CGR) Data Collection Data Conversion Video Relay Process Data Transformation Metadata Index Data Manager Movement Broadcast Disseminate Data Monitor
Proposed Architecture
Services Implementation Plan 10/1/2013-9/30/2014 Phase One 10/1/2014-9/30/2015 Phase Two 1/1/2014 4/1/2014 7/1/2014 10/1/2014 1/1/2015 4/1/2015 7/1/2015 10/1/2013 9/30/2015 10/1/2013 9/30/2014 Infrastructure Services Implementation (Policy, Security, Audit, Logging, PK/CA) 11/1/2014 5/2/2015 Infrastructure Services Enhancement (Advanced Encryption, Compression, and Advanced; Automated Workflow) 10/1/2013-3/31/2014 Common Ground Receiver Service 10/1/2014-3/31/2015 Enhanced Video Collection Service 1/1/2014-6/30/2014 1/1/2015-6/30/2015 Process Service Enhanced Data Transformation 4/1/2014-9/30/2014 Data Manager Service 4/1/2015-9/30/2015 Data Monitor & Management Service
Lets get down to it BUSINESS
Focus
How we will REDUCE COST Automated Workflow Minimal Footprint Scalable Solution
5 year Project Outlook Year 1 R&D Phase 1 Year 2 R&D Phase 2 Ship deployment Phase 1 Year 3 Ship deployment Phase 2 Operations of phase 1 deployment Year 4 Ship deployment Phase 3 Operations of phase 1 & 2 deployment Year 5 Cumulative Operations of deployment phases 1,2, & 3
Financial Analysis Operations Savings Cash Flows Operations Operating Costs Deployment Capacity Costs Deployment Labor Costs R&D Capital Costs R&D Labor Costs ($50,000,000) $0 $50,000,000 $100,000,000 $150,000,000 $200,000,000 $250,000,000 $300,000,000 $350,000,000 Year 1 (R&D Phase 1) Year 2 (R&D Phase 2 & 25 ship deployment) Year 3 (100 ship deployment) Year 4 (75 ship deployment) Year 5 ( Operations)
Value Proposition 2018 $ $ $113.00 $113.0 2017 $ $ $113.00 $113.0 2016 $ $18.0 $95.00 $113.0 2015 $ $23.0 $47.20 $70.2 2014 $4.90 $13.1 $6.8 $1.4 $1.40 2013 $1.4 NPV $2.6 $42.9 $312.14 $355.3 ($50.0) $0.0 $50.0 $100.0 $150.0 $200.0 $250.0 $300.0 $350.0 $400.0 Net Option Value Asset Value Option Exercise Option Purchase
We appreciate your time CLOSING
Closing Faculty Hal Sorenson Ingolf Kruger Alexander Zack Thomas Roemer Stakeholders Mike O Sullivan Mo Kane Mike Stewart