THE EFFECTS OF CRUDE OIL POLLUTION ON PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL

Similar documents
Bioremediation of contaminated soil. Dr. Piyapawn Somsamak Department of Environmental Science Kasetsart University

Bioremediation. Introduction

In-situ Bioremediation of oily sediments and soil

Land Application of Drilling Fluids: Landowner Considerations

Characterizing Beauty Salon Wastewater for the Purpose of Regulating Onsite Disposal Systems

Physical flow accounts: principles and general concepts

How To Clean Polluted Environment

BP Texas City Refinery

Bioremediation of Petroleum Contamination. Augustine Ifelebuegu GE413

Aspects of bioremediation of polluted soils with hydrocarbons

Introduction to Waste Treatment Technologies. Contents. Household waste

Use of Substitute Fuels in Large Combustion Plants (LCPs)

Automotive Base Oil Presentation

CHAPTER 7: REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER

SAFETY DATA SHEET According to 91/155 EC

APPENDIX B CHARACTERIZATION OF SOILS AT TEST SITES

Chapter 14 Quiz. Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Environmental Forensics

SIX REASONS TO DRY BIOGAS To A LOW DEWPOINT BEFORE COMBUSTION IN A CHP ENGINE STEVEN SCOTT MARKET DEVELOPMENT MANAGER ALTERNATIVE ENERGIES

6 Chemicals from human settlements

Physical & Chemical Properties. Properties

WHAT IS IN FERTILIZER OTHER THAN NUTRIENTS?

Refinery Equipment of Texas. Mini - Refinery Feasibility Overview

Material Safety Data Sheet according to Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 (REACH) 1 Identification of the substance/mixture and of the company/undertaking

Title 27A. Environment and Natural Resources Chapter 1 - Oklahoma Environmental Quality Act Article III - Jurisdiction of Environmental Agencies

Beneficial Utilisation of Sasol Coal Gasification Ash

Post-Impact Assessment of Crude Oil Spilled Site: Four Years After Recorded Incidence

Environmental and Economical Oil and Groundwater Recovery and Treatment Options for hydrocarbon contaminated Sites

Bioremediation Technology

CE 110 Introduction to Environmental Engineering (3)

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2015 SCORING GUIDELINES

Best Management Practices

CRG CONSERVE RESOURCES GROUP ECO ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES. NEW State of the Art. Advanced OIL REFINERY TECHNOLOGY & PROCESSES

A SOIL TESTING SERVICE FOR FARMERS IN THAILAND, USING MOBILE LABORATORIES

LABORATORY STUDIES ON THE BIOREMEDIATION OF SOIL CONTAMINATED BY DIESEL

WASTEWATER TREATMENT OBJECTIVES

Bio-remediation of a crude oil contaminated soil using water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes)

Chemistry at Work. How Chemistry is used in the Water Service

Testing Water for Gardening and Lawn Irrigation

What is Soil Survey?

ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF ENERGY SOURCES. Prepared by Sandra Vasa-Sideris, PhD, Southern Polytechnic State University, for use by students

Quality requirements and quality assurance of digestion residuals in Germany

Partnering with Nature for a Cleaner Tomorrow

Welcome to the Understanding Dissolved Oxygen learning module. This section provides information on the following topics:

1. PUBLIC HEALTH STATEMENT

SANTA FE COUNTY'S OIL DEVELOPMENT ZONING ORDINANCE

Chemical Accidents. Dr. Omid Kalatpour CEOH

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS APPENDIX C LIST OF E&P WASTES: EXEMPT AND NONEXEMPT

4. PRODUCTION, IMPORT/EXPORT, USE, AND DISPOSAL

CHAPTER PETROLEUM CONTACT WATER

ENVIRONMENTAL CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE BATCH PLANT & ROCK WASHING OPERATIONS

Waterproofing System for Wastewater Tanks in Petrochemical Industries and Refineries

T 465 Bucasan Pino Date of issue: Page 1 of 10

Nutrient Removal at Wastewater Treatment Facilities. Nitrogen and Phosphorus. Gary M. Grey HydroQual, Inc X 7167

EARTH OIL EXTRACTION MAJOR ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION SOURCE

US Safety Data Sheet GEAR OIL SAE 10W/30 GEAR OIL SAE 10W/30

EPA Oil Spill Research Grant Program

LAB 5 - PLANT NUTRITION. Chemical Ionic forms Approximate dry Element symbol Atomic weight Absorbed by plants tissue concentration

How To Prevent Over Water Activities

Additional Lecture: TITRATION BASICS

Living & Working Managing Natural Resources and Waste

Making Biodiesel from Virgin Vegetable Oil: Teacher Manual

Acid Rain why it is a concern

ATOMS AND BONDS. Bonds

PRESENTATION 2 MAJOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS

West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection Industrial Facility Closure Guidance Document. Revised July 2009

การช วบ าบ ด (Bioremediation)

SPILL CONTAINMENT AND CONTROL PLAN

IDENTIFYING YOUR WASTE

SAFETY DATA SHEET EVO-STIK PLUMBERS MAIT

EMERGENCY PETROLEUM SPILL WASTE MANAGEMENT GUIDANCE. Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division (303)

Lesson Plan for Oil Spills Part 2: Cleaning Up an Oil Spill Written by Phillip Tu (UC Berkeley) and adapted by Liz Roth-Johnson (UCLA)

DIRECTIVE 055: STORAGE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE UPSTREAM PETROLEUM INDUSTRY. August 2012

What are the causes of air Pollution

Chapter 3: Separating Mixtures (pg )

Ground Water Contamination by Leachate

Soil Cleanup Goals. Minnesota Department of Agriculture Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division. Guidance Document 19

Advanced Soil Organic Matter Management

Assessing Your Petroleum Product Storage Facilities

MBJ Environmental Programmes

Summary of Environment and Social Impacts for Activates Associated with Petroleum Refining and the Storage of Petroleum Products

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

CALCIUM AND MAGNESIUM: THE SECONDARY COUSINS George Rehm, University of Minnesota

Lesson Plan: How Do We Clean Polluted Water?

Defence College of Technical Training. Former RAF Lyneham Geo-Environmental Report Appendix D: Preliminary Qualitative Risk Assessment

FINAL PLAN OF REMEDIAL ACTION

Water Treatment Filtration Lab. discharged into an aquatic ecosystem? We had to build a water filtration system with

vision meets philosophy

Planning, Designing, Monitoring and Inspection of Wastewater Treatment Systems of Industries

SAFETY DATA SHEET BOSTIK AQUAGRIP 536

SAFETY DATA SHEET. according to 1907/2006/EC, Article 31 CYTOFIXX (CYTOLOGICAL FIXATIVE)

COKE PRODUCTION FOR BLAST FURNACE IRONMAKING

INFORMATION SHEET ORDER NO. R XXXX TRIANGLE ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. FLORIN ROAD AGGREGATE PLANT SACRAMENTO COUNTY

Environmental guidelines for preparation of an Environment Management Plan

Presented by Paul Krauth Utah DEQ. Salt Lake Countywide Watershed Symposium October 28-29, 2008

Regulatory Related FAQs

Orange County Sanitation District

UNIVERSITA DEGLI STUDI DI ROMA LA SAPIENZA DIPARTIMENTO INGEGNERIA CHIMICA MATERIALI AMBIENTE

Typical commercial laboratory turn around - two days to two weeks In-house hexane/gravimetric several hours Results in the discharge of effluent

TOUR DE TABLE CANADA

Transcription:

THE EFFECTS OF CRUDE OIL POLLUTION ON PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL Mariana MARINESCU, M. TOTI, Veronica TANASE, Georgiana PLOPEANU, Irina CALCIU, M. MARINESCU National Research Development Institute for Soil Science, Agrochemistry and Environmental Protection, 61 Marasti Avenue, Bucharest, Romania E-mail:maramarinescu2003@yahoo.com Abstract: Pollution caused by crude oil is the most prevalent problem in the environment. The release of crude oil into the environment by oil spills is receiving worldwide attention. Crude oil products represent the one of the most common environmental contaminant / pollutant. Most oil pollution sources are anthropogenic, but there are also some natural sources. Common sources of these products are motor fuel station underground storage tanks, home and commercial heating oil storage tanks, fuel distribution centers, refineries, crude oil production sites and accidental spills. There is evidenced that some organisms, such as high-class plants are able to degrade hydrocarbons and can penetrate the soil. Crude oil is a complex mixture of hydrocarbons. It includes an aliphatic fraction, an aromatic fraction, asphaltenes, and resins. The effect of crude oil pollution on physical and chemical characteristics of soil was investigated by achieving a case study in Perisoru, Braila County. It has been achieved a profile until 120 cm and 3 soundings until 60 cm from where soil samples were collected according to the 125 methodology and analyzed for physical and chemical characteristics point of view. In case of physical analysis, the values obtained for granulometric fractions were not influenced by the presence of crude oil. Results obtained showed variation in chemical properties of soil. Organic carbon increased from 2.23 for an unpolluted soil to 5.51 in polluted soil. C/N ratios increased from 13 for an unpolluted soil to 21 in polluted soil. Mobile phosphorous and potassium registered in polluted soil similar values with the one characteristic for unpolluted soil. Crude oil at high pollution levels inhibited the growth of crops. Because high concentrations (>1) of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil have demonstrated phytotoxic properties, as well as the uncertainty about the fate and transport of high concentrations of petroleum in soils and upon human health, the specific fuel nondefault closure levels have maximum limits applied. It is generally recognized that the toxicity, (human and environmental), of petroleum products increases as the molecular weights of the compounds decrease. Key words: crude oil, pollution, physical and chemical characteristics of soil, Braila County. INTRODUCTION Romania still depends largely on crude oil for income earnings. Crude oil spillage is also a very common problem in the country. There is therefore a need for continuous research on the problems associated with pollution resulting from spillage and its effects on the soil environment which has a negative impact on crop growth on it. Hence this particular study had as its main objective to examine the effects of crude oil on soil physical and chemical properties (GÂŞTESCU and GRUESCU, 1973; TOTI et al., 1999). Soil pollution is defined as the appearance in soils of persistent toxic compounds, chemicals, salts, radioactive materials, or disease causing agents, which have adverse effects on plant growth and animal health (PEPPER, 1996). One of the most important classes of organic pollutants in the environment is crude oil constituents of petrochemicals. Accidental oil pollution has become nowadays a common phenomenon that can cause environmental and social disasters (BURGER, 1993; BURNS, 1993). Potential sources of direct

pollution of soil and subsoil can be covered by tanks, separators old from wastewater treatment plants, settling basins, slurries and waste pits of tar, ramp CF loading and unloading, underground pipelines, sewerage networks, etc. Solid residues, unstored corresponding, which can pollute the soil, come from: solid impurities involved in crude oil, sewage sludge from wastewater treatment plants and raw water treatment, solid waste from the maintenance and cleaning of incinerator ash sludge, powder catalyst (NEAG, 1997). MATERIAL AND METHODS The perimeter in which has been set for the case study was chosen according to the massive pollution of cracking a crude oil pipeline from CONPET. Crude oil spilled in different proportions affected soil until 120 cm and 3 soundings untill 60 cm, except S1 where it goes untill 90 cm. The profile P1, S1 and S3 soundings were classified as epicalcaric chernozem and S2 sounding as proxicalcaric chernozem according to the Romanian System of Soil Taxonomy (FLOREA and MUNTEANU, 2003). In the control area were performed two soil profiles. For the characterization of soil cover in particular the upper horizon of their samples were collected in two depths (0-20 cm and 20-40 cm). The analysis achieved using the ICPA methodology were: granulometric fractions, soil reaction by potentiometric method, organic carbon content by titrimetric method of Walkley Black, total nitrogen content by Kjeldahl method, C/N ratio by calculation, mobile phosphorus content by Egner-Riehm-Domingo method, mobile potassium content by flamephotometer method, total petroleum hidrocarbons by gravimetric method and soluble salt content by conductometric method according to the methodologies (METHODOLOGIES, 1981, 1986). RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS Physical and chemical characteristics of soil samples from the studied area are presented in following tables. Physical characteristics are presented in table 1 for control area and in table 2 for polluted area. Chemical characteristics are presented in table 3 for control area and in table 4 for polluted area. According to the results of physical analysis, all samples fall within the clay textural class. Coarse sand registered the normal values at majority depths. Fine sand shows values between 42.6 and 51.7 in case of polluted area. Dust is found more in the surface horizon with a value of 26.2 and the lowest value recorded in Ac 1 horizon, 55-75 cm, had a value of 24.2. Clay has the highest value in the horizon of the C Ca profile - 34 and the lowest in the Ac 1 horizon - 25.8. Compared with unpolluted soil chernozem, the values of each fraction is similar with the results obtained in the polluted soil. The granulometric fractions are not influenced by the presence of crude oil. Soil reaction is weak alkaline in all the samples ranging between 7.70 to 8.26, except for samples taken from Amt horizon, the depth of 0-20 cm, showing a weak acid reaction (6.22) and samples taken from Am horizon, the depth of 20-40 cm, which shows a neutral reaction (6.83). If an unpolluted soil contain organic carbon from 2.23 to 2.02 in the first horizons 0-20 cm and 20-40 cm depth, the values obtained in the polluted profile are much higher, being registered contents by 5.51, respectively, 4.44. Also, organic carbon contents decrease with depth reaching a value by 2.43 which indicates that oil pollution has come down to that depth. Normally at this depth, organic carbon content in an unpolluted soil would vary between 0.3-0.5 being extremely low. Crude oil has a significantly influence on this parameter, the values determined being much higher because of the presence of pollutant. 126

Total nitrogen content in the moderate class is falling all the samples analyzed is between 0.151-0.251, except for samples taken from Amt horizon, the depth of 0-20 cm, showing a high content of total nitrogen (0.313) and AC1 samples collected from the horizon, the depth of 55-75 cm, showing a lower total nitrogen content (0.133). Compared to the total nitrogen content recorded in control area, the values obtained in polluted almost similar. The C/N ratios have the same behavior as organic carbon content. If an unpolluted soil chernozem has a C/N ratio ranges between 13.01 and 12.88 in the 0-20 cm and 20-40 cm depth, in the polluted profile the values for C/N ratios are much higher ranging between 20.54-20.64. The maximum value was registered in 55-75 cm depth where it reaches a value of 30.53 and started to decrease with depth, being registered a value of 21.84 at 75-95 cm depth and a value of 16.02 at 100-120 cm depth. On all sampling depths, in the polluted area, the situation is very different, the values of C/N ratio are much higher. It also other, C/N decreases with depth reaching 16.02, which indicates that oil pollution has come down to that depth. Normally at this depth, the C/N has values ranging from 10 to 11 indicating a small content. Thus, if the polluted area from Perisoru, high content are registered from the surface to 120 cm because of the presence of crude oil. Moreover, total petroleum hydrocarbon content will certify the values of C/N ratio and the organic carbon content increased highly comparatively with unpolluted soil because of loading with pollutants. In the control area, the values obtained for mobile phosphorus content includes in a small content class. The content of mobile phosphorus profile decreases with depth, with high content on the surface, middle in the 2nd horizon, over the next three horizons small value indicating content. In all three surveys, this parameter decreases with depth. In the polluted profile, mobile phosphorus content decreases with depth, reaching a maximum value at the surface. In the second horizon, the mobile phosphorous decreases by half, over the next three horizons is constant value representing only 1/7 of the value registered on the surface. Thus, in Amt horizon (0-20 cm) of profile was determined a value by 73 mg kg -1 which indicates a high content of mobile phosphorus on the surface. The value registered at the surface drops to half in the Am horizon located on 20-40 cm depth having a value by 36 mg kg -1 which indicates middle mobile phosphorus content. In the Ac 1 horizon (55-75 cm), in the Ac 2 horizon (75-95 cm) and in the C Ca horizon (100-120 cm) was determined lower content of mobile phosphorus values by 11 mg kg -1, 11 mg kg -1, respectively 8.73 mg kg -1. Compared to the contents of mobile phosphorus recorded in an unpolluted soil, the values in the study area are higher, but not significantly because some doses distributed CONPET which content phosphorus and other absorbent materials to remedy the situation. Mobile potassium contents obtained in the control area are similar to the values from polluted area. The mobile phosphorus content decreases with depth, having a maximum value at the surface, decreases by half in the other four horizons. Thus, Amt horizon at 0-20 cm depth was determined a value of 222 mg kg -1 which indicates a high content of mobile potassium on the surface. The values recorded in the Am horizon located at a depth of 20-40 cm and Ac 1 horizon at 55-75 cm falls within the middle class having a value by 112 mg kg -1 in both horizons. In the Ac 2 horizon (75-95 cm) and C Ca horizon (100-120 cm) were determined low potassium content being registered a value by 96 mg kg -1 and 80 mg kg -1. In case of potassium, the situation is similar with phosphorous, so compared to the contents of mobile potassium recorded in an unpolluted soil, the values in the study area are higher, but not significantly because some doses distributed CONPET which content potassium and other absorbent materials to remedy the situation. 127

No. Tabel 1 Physical characteristics of soil sampled from control area located in Perisoru, Braila County Control profile Soil type and subtype cm Granulometric fractions (mm) (from mineral part of soil) Coarse sand Fine sand Dust 2,0-0,2 0,2-0,02 0,02-0,002 Clay <0,02 Carbonates Symbol Textural class 1 Control Epicalcaric 0-20 0,2 44,7 24,3 30,8 0,0 LL profile - 2 cernozem P1 20-40 0,3 43,9 31,4 24,4 0,0 LL 3 Control 0-20 0,1 46,3 29,5 24,1 3,1 LL 4 profile - P2 Proxicalcaric cernozem 20-40 0,1 56,4 20,3 23,2 4,2 LL Tabel 2 Physical characteristics of soil sampled from polluted area located in Perisoru, Braila County No. Location Horizon Granulometric fractions (mm) Symbol ( from mineral part of soil) Carbonates Textural cm Coarse sand Fine sand Dust Clay class 2,0-0,2 0,2-0,02 0,02-0,002 <0,02 1 Amt 0-20 0,1 42,6 26,2 31,1 0,0 LL 2 Perişoru, Am 20-40 0,1 45,2 24,9 29,8 0,0 LL 3 Braila County, AC 1 55-75 0,1 45,7 25,2 29,0 4,1 LL 4 Profile 1 P1 AC 2 75-95 0,1 49,9 24,2 25,8 9,5 LL 5 C Ca 100-120 0,1 50,4 25,5 24,0 13,8 LL 6 0-20 0,6 51,7 24,4 23,3 9,9 LL Perişoru, 7 20-40 0,1 47,2 21,9 30,8 0,0 LL Braila County, 8 50-70 0,2 48,9 24,5 26,4 5,4 LL Sounding S1 9 70-90 0,0 46,7 25,2 28,1 2,3 LL 10 Perişoru, 0-20 0,1 50,0 26,6 23,3 9,0 LL 11 Braila County, 20-40 0,1 49,5 25,0 25,4 5,2 LL 12 Sounding S2 40-60 0,1 47,6 27,5 24,8 4,6 LL 13 Perişoru, 0-20 0,1 50,6 22,2 27,1 2,3 LL 14 Braila County, 20-40 0,1 51,1 23,0 25,8 2,5 LL 15 No. Sounding S3 40-60 0,1 45,2 25,3 29,4 0,0 LL Tabel 3 Chemical characteristics of soil sampled from control area located in Perisoru, Braila County Control profile Soil type and subtype -cm- ph Organic C Total N C/N Ratio P mg kg -1 K mg kg -1 1 Control profile - Epicalcaric 0 20 6,80 2,23 0,200 13,01 3,2 206 P1 cernozem 2 20 40 6,79 2,02 0,183 12,88 4,1 145 3 Control profile - Proxicalcaric 0 20 8,05 1,91 0,162 13,75 3,0 210 P2 cernozem 4 20 40 8,20 1,64 0,157 12,19 4,0 136 Tabel 4 Chemical characteristics of soil sampled from polluted area located in Perisoru, Braila County No. Location Organic C Total N P K ph C/N Ratio -cm- mg kg -1 mg kg -1 1 0-20 6,22 5,51 0,313 20,54 73 222 2 Perişoru, Braila 20-40 6,83 4,44 0,251 20,64 36 112 3 County, Profile 1 55-75 8,01 3,48 0,133 30,53 11 112 4 P1 75-95 8,20 3,22 0,172 21,84 11 96 5 100-120 8,36 2,43 0,177 16,02 8,73 80 6 0-20 8,26 2,01 0,151 15,53 13 144 Perişoru, Braila 7 20-40 7,73 3,77 0,165 26,66 12 112 County, Sounding 8 S1 50-70 8,04 2,04 0,189 12,59 10 112 9 70-90 8,02 3,00 0,177 19,77 8,28 112 10 Perişoru, Braila 0-20 8,16 3,08 0,177 20,30 22 144 11 County, Sounding 20-40 8,00 2,77 0,192 16,83 21 128 12 S2 40-60 8,02 2,30 0,162 16,56 15 128 13 Perişoru, Braila 0-20 8,01 3,17 0,165 22,41 8,06 160 14 County, Sounding 20-40 8,02 2,61 0,211 14,43 8,05 128 15 S3 40-60 7,36 4,21 0,191 25,71 8,04 96 128

CONCLUSIONS Results of physical and chemical analysis effectuated at the polluted soil samples from polluted profile show large differences compared to the results from an unpolluted soil profile as a result of crude oil pollution in the territory. The most affected characteristics are organic carbon content and C/N ratio. Oil removal from the soil surface is essential in reducing anaerobic processes and the depth of penetration of the pollutant. Calcaric chernozem has a loamy texture and a moderate organic matter and nutrients contents that make the degradation process intensively, if the main limiting factors the biodegradation of the pollutant are removed. In conclusion, crude oil polluted area taken in study can be rehabilitated without anthropogenic intervention, without the application of specific measures biodegradation and improvement of soil quality while being very difficult depending on factors that can enhance the action of microorganisms in the soil. Ameliorative measures are recommended for reconstruction of polluted areas with crude oil. Heavily and excessive polluted areas with petroleum hydrocarbons requires an ecological restoration of land to be made on larger areas on which to make appropriate ameliorative work. BIBLIOGRAFY 1. BURGER, A.E., Estimating the mortality of seabirds following oil spills effects of spill volume, Marine Pollution Bulletin 26, pag. 239 248, 1993. 2. BURNS, K.A., GARRITY, S.D., LEVINGS, S.C., How many years until mangrove ecosystems recover from catastrophic oil-spills, Marine Pollution Bulletin 26, pag. 239 248, 1993. 3. FLOREA, N., MUNTEANU, I., Sistemul Român de Taxonomie a Solurilor, Editura Estfalia, Bucureşti, 2003. 4. GÂŞTESCU, P., GRUESCU, S.I., 1973 - Judetul Brăila, Editura Academiei R.S.R., Bucuresti. 5. NEAG, Gh., Depoluarea solurilor şi apelor subterane, Editura Casa Cărţii de Ştiinţă, Cluj Napoca, 1997. 6. PEPPER, Ian L., GERBA, Charles P., BRUSSEAU, Mark L, 1996, Pollution Science, Academic Press. 7. TOTI M., DUMITRU, M., CĂPITANU, V., Maria DRACEA, Carolina CONSTANTIN, Constantin CRĂCIUN, 1999 - Poluarea cu petrol şi apă sărată a solurilor din România, Ed. RISOPRINT, Cluj-Napoca, 254 pag. 8. *** Metode de analiza chimica a solului, Bucuresti, 1986. 9. *** Metodologia elaborarii studiilor pedologice, vol. III, Indicatorii ecopedologici, Bucuresti, 1981. 129