E-prescribing Survey Results

Similar documents
Perceptions of FQHC Staff Regarding EHRs and Health Information Exchange

How To Write An Eprescription In Dubai

Behavioral Health Services and Digital Data visualization Interview

FLORIDA CENTER FOR HEALTH INFORMATION AND POLICY ANALYSIS AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION

Best Practice Recommendation for

Second Annual Florida 2008 Electronic Prescribing Report

1. Do I have to contact the pharmacies in my area before they start sending me refill requests electronically?

Report on Electronic Prescribing in Medicaid and the Children s Health Insurance Program (CHIP)

How To Understand The Benefits Of Electronic Prescribing

Running head: HEALTHCARE... ELECTRONIC PRESCRIBING 1

2013 E-Prescribing Incentive Requirements

e -Prescribing An Information Brief

Concept Series Paper on Electronic Prescribing

Health IT: Provider s Issues

SureScripts Frequently Asked Questions

Why should I report issues directly through my pharmacy management system vendor and not Surescripts?

MEDICAL ASSISTANCE BULLETIN

Re: Docket No. DEA-218, Electronic Prescriptions for Controlled Substances

Evaluation of pharmacy metric and workload factors impact on patient safety

Report on the study: Examining Causes, Consequences, and Interventions to Address E- Prescribing Errors in Community Pharmacies

Electronic Prescribing

How Real-Time Data Integration is Changing the Face of Healthcare IT

OPTIMIZING THE USE OF YOUR ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD. A collaborative training offered by Highmark and the Pittsburgh Regional Health Initiative

Advancements in Technology to Streamline and Expedite Patient Access. CBI Reimbursement & Access AUG 13, 2:15PM

Why Medicare's E-Prescribing Bonus Gives Labs A New Opportunity for Added Value. Ravi Sharma, CEO 4medica, Inc.

Privacy, Security, and Trust with Federated Identity Management

E-Prescribing FAQ s for Independent Pharmacies Table of Contents

SASKATCHEWAN COLLEGE OF PHARMACISTS Electronic Transmission of Prescriptions. Policy Statement and Guidelines for Pharmacists

EHR/PM Solution. Wound Care

How do I work with my pharmacy management system vendor to enable my pharmacy for e-prescribing via the Surescripts network?

EMR Adoption Survey. Instructions. This survey contains a series of multiple-choice questions corresponding to the 5-stage EMR Adoption Model.

National Progress Report on eprescribing. Healthcare Technology Network Meeting March 28, 2008

Building a Second Generation eprescribing Network

Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH): Communication and Care Coordination

15 things you should know before shopping for an EHR

PHARMACY SURVEY: BASELINE

Tame your turnover: EHR & patient retention

ExCPT Certified Pharmacy Technician (CPhT) Detailed Test Plan* 100 scored items, 20 pretest items Exam time: 2 hours 10 minutes

Clinician s Guide to Update. e-prescribing

Vendor Evaluation Matrix Tool Presented By: Developed By: Version: Date: Description: Table of Contents:

Guide To Meaningful Use

Abacus Rx, Inc SW 117 Ave PH-G Visit us at Miami, FL (305) Fax (305)

Reducing Medical Errors with an Electronic Medical Records System

WHITEPAPER 6 EHR TRENDS to Watch in

Med Sync YOUR STEP-BY-STEP QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE

Prescribing a new medication

E-PRESCRIBING OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES

ELECTRONIC PRESCRIBING

Use of computer technology to support antimicrobial stewardship

Standards of Practice for Pharmacists and Pharmacy Technicians

BEYOND IDENTITY PROOFING: How EHRs Can Become More Than Just Vendors

Implementation of the Electronic Prescription Standard for Dentistry

Improving the Delivery of Care and Reducing Healthcare Costs with the Digitization of Information

Using Electronic Prescriptions (erx)

Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODL 8701 Morrissette Drive Springfield, VA 22152

eprescribing Information to Improve Medication Adherence

DISCLAIMER OBJECTIVES IV ROBOTICS IV ROBOTICS

Selecting Your Stage 1 Meaningful Use MENU Objectives

December Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program Report on Health Information Technology (HIT) and Transparency

Nortec. ACT Now! Nortec EHR. Qualify & Receive $44,000. An Integrated Electronic Health Record Software.

Meaningful Use. Goals and Principles

Running Head: WORKFLOW ANALYSIS 1. Workflow Analysis of a Primary Care Clinic Before and After Implementation of an Electronic Health Record

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DEFINING AND DEMONSTRATING MEANINGFUL USE OF CERTIFIED ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS (EHRs)

Fourth Annual Florida 2010 Electronic Prescribing Report

Health Information Exchange (HIE) in Minnesota

Optum Physician EMR Administration Module Setup Guide for eprescribing

247 CMR: BOARD OF REGISTRATION IN PHARMACY

Issue Brief Findings from HSC

SafetyFirst Alert. Errors in Transcribing and Administering Medications

MAPD-SNP Contract Numbers: H5852; H3132

Moving Forward with E-prescribe. Requirements, State Law & Meaningful Use

Transforming Healthcare in Emerging Markets with EMR adoption

Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee Policies and Procedures

CHAPTER 10 PHARMACY TECHNICIAN REGULATIONS. These regulations are promulgated as authorized by the Act.

Electronic Prescription Standard for Dentistry

Ensuring Safe & Efficient Communication of Medication Prescriptions

IT requirement specification Safety alert. Oral methotrexate 2.5mg and 10mg tablets

Health Information Technology in Healthcare: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 1

Pharmacy Operating Guidelines & Information

Faculty Disclosure. Pharmacist Learning Objectives. Pharmacy e-hit: The Future of Pharmacy and Patient Care

11/26/2012. Implementation of Florida s PDMP. Disclosure

Licensed Pharmacy Technician Scope of Practice

UNDERSTANDING YOUR HEALTH NET PHARMACY BENEFITS Los Angeles Unified School District Learning about your pharmacy benefits can save you time and money

2013 Meaningful Use Dashboard Calculation Guide

The Evolving Role of DDI Clinical Decision Support in E-Prescribing and Consumer-Oriented DDI Databases

Accelerating the Adoption of Electronic Prescribing

Please see Section IX. for Additional Information:

Mona Osman MD, MPH, MBA

November 2009 Special Edition

Nortec. ACT Now! Nortec EHR. Qualify & Receive $44,000. An Integrated Electronic Health Record Software.

Special Topics in Vendor- Specific Systems. Outline. Results Review. Unit 4 EHR Functionality. EHR functionality. Results Review

How To Become A Pharmacy Technician

Pharmacy Technician A. Interpersonal Skills Physical Effort Concentration Complexity

Medicare Part D Plan Finder instructions

Report of the Task Force on Electronic Prescribing Software Standards and Data Storage

Errors Associated with the Use of E-PrescribingE

Pharmacy Handbook. Understanding Your Prescription Benefit

Minnesota Nursing Home Health Information Technology Survey Results

DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS, BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL P.O. BOX JUNEAU, ALASKA ALASKA STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY

Please see Section IX. for Additional Information:

Transcription:

E-prescribing Survey Results Dr. Monica Chiarini Tremblay Dr. Gloria J. Deckard Florida International University

E-prescribing Electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) is a type of health information technology that allows prescribers to securely send electronic prescriptions directly to pharmacies using specific software. Large national health policy initiatives are promoting the adoption and meaningful use of certified electronic health records (EHRs) with electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) in order to improve the safety, quality, and efficiency of healthcare delivery 2

Benefits of E-prescribing Many goals and benefits have been attributed to e- prescribing including: Reduction in medication errors Streamlined refill processes Better formulary management Improved efficiency for prescribers and pharmacists Elimination of handwriting interpretation errors Reduced phone calls between pharmacists and physicians Reduced data entry Expedited prescription refill requests 3

Survey Development and Purpose Purpose of survey: To assess e-prescribing adoption status in Florida and factors which would encourage further adoption To obtain pharmacists perceptions regarding the benefits of e-prescribing To obtain pharmacists perceptions regarding concerns and risks associated with e-prescribing systems for pharmacists To measure the overall satisfaction of e-prescribing by pharmacists 4

Likert Scales Least Positive Very Difficult Never Strongly Disagree Very Ineffective Very Dissatisfied Extremely Concerned Most Positive Very Easy All the time Strongly Agree Very Effective Very Satisfied Not at all concerned 5

Survey Distribution Online Qualtrics survey URL link emailed to individual pharmacists 3 weekly reminders Distributed to pharmacists associated with Florida Pharmacy Association (FPA) with the assistance of Michael Jackson Florida Association of Community Health Centers (FACHC) with the assistance of Benjamin Browning Thank you to both of these gentlemen 6

Respondents Florida Pharmacy Association Sent to approximately 1100 individual pharmacists 285 community pharmacists 269 independent community pharmacists. 197 accessed survey link 150 completed full survey 82 (54%) identified themselves as community pharmacists 47 (31%) indicated they were part of a corporate chain Florida Association of Community Health Centers Sent to 51 FQHCs 23 accessed survey link 20 completed full survey 7

Pharmacy Characteristics FPA Average Daily Pharmacist Staffing Mean = 2.04 51% reported 1 26% reported 2 Utilization of Pharmacy Technicians 94% Role of respondent Staff Pharmacist 32% Director/Manager 38% Owner/Partner 28% Have e-prescribing system 91% FACHC Average Daily Pharmacist Staffing Mean = 1.88 41% reported 1 26% reported 2 Utilization of Pharmacy Technicians - 100% Role of Respondent Pharmacy Director 100% Have e-prescribing system 83% 8

Type and Location of Primary Pharmacy FPA FACHC Independent/Community - Single site 41% Single FQHC site/location 11% Independent/Community- Multiple sites 13% Corporate affiliation (Chain) 31% Multiple FQHC sites/location 89% Urban setting 76% Urban setting 74% Rural setting 24% Rural setting 26% 9

E-prescribing System FPA 94% of respondents Time in Place 1-5 Years 61% > 5 Years 30% No System in Place 53% Not considered 33% Considered but no plans to implement within 6 months 13% Implement within 6 months FACHC 83% of respondents Time in Place 1-5 Years 50% > 5 Years 33% No System in Place 0% Not considered 75% Considered but no plans to implement within 6 months 25% Implement within 6 months 10

E-prescribing System FPA Ease of Use Mean = 3.9 Satisfaction Mean = 3.54 Preference 59% prefer e-prescribing over traditional written Access with (select all) Desktop 97% Laptop - 6% Tablet or Handheld 1% FACHC Ease of Use Mean = 4.21 Satisfaction Mean = 4.43 Preference 79% prefer e-prescribing over traditional written Access with (select all) Desktop 100% Laptop 50% Tablet or Handheld 17% 11

Perceived Consequence of E-prescribing for Patients Potential Consequence Mean - FPA Mean FACHC Increased likelihood of patient receiving incorrect drug therapy 2.76 2.00 Increased medication cost for the patient 2.26 2.14 Patient frustration due to delayed dispensing of e-prescription 3.09 2.64 Improved medication management 3.30 3.64 Improved service for patient due to improved efficiency in workflow 3.46 4.00 Improved patient safety and quality of care 3.26 4.07 12

Perceived Benefits of E-prescribing for Pharmacist Potential Benefit Mean - FPA Mean - FACHC Improved efficiency due to ability of physician to check insurance coverage in advance Ability to receive alerts, warnings and reminders 2.69 2.86 3.04 3.64 Pharmacist has access to more information to monitor compliance 2.83 3.71 Pharmacist has access to more information to prevent drug interactions 2.89 3.79 Less chance of medication error 3.03 3.93 Improved efficiency due to e- prescription process (workflow) Security and integrity provided by e- prescription system 3.85 4.14 3.60 4.29 13

Perceived Barriers of E-Prescribing FPA FACHC 14

Perceptions of Errors and Factors Contributing to Errors Associated with e-prescribing Frequency of Errors Not high Frequency of Error Mean FPA Mean - FACHC Wrong patient 1.91 1.57 Wrong drug 2.58 2.00 Wrong dose, strength or frequency 3.04 2.43 Wrong dosage form 3.00 2.46 Wrong quantity 3.10 2.36 Duplicate therapy 3.01 2.50 Data transmission errors 2.80 2.14 Factors Contributing to Errors Perception of Factor Contributing to Errors Incorrect calculation or entry of information Auto-population of incorrect information Mismatch of e-prescription information between prescriber and pharmacy systems Mean FPA Mean - FACHC 3.44 4.36 3.57 4.07 3.53 2.71 15

Perceptions of Error Detection Activities Associated with e-prescribing Effectiveness of E-prescribing System to Detect Error Mean - FPA Mean FQHC Effectiveness 2.91 3.43 Consequence of Error Mean - FPA Mean - FACHC Slowing down pharmacy workflow due to additional work 3.23 2.64 Problem-solving required for pharmacy personnel 3.74 3.00 Increased cost, audit and insurance billing issues for pharmacy 3.11 2.79 Frequency of Activity for Pharmacist Mean - FPA Mean FQHC Error explanation 3.44 3.57 Error correction 3.57 3.86 Error detection 3.53 3.86 16

E-prescribing of Controlled Substances RARE FPA: 62% None in past week FACHC: 93% None in past week The controlled drug process is too complex and cumbersome for widespread provider participation. E-prescribing of controlled substances is far to complicated for prescribers to adopt in any great numbers. 17

FPA Concerns about E-prescribing of Mean = 2.91 Controlled Substances FACHC Mean = 3.75 - higher score shows less concern Reasons contributing to concern: Validation need to reconfirm Fraud and Abuse Security, privacy Reporting costs Reasons contributing to concern: Validation need to reconfirm Fraud and Abuse Reporting costs Security, privacy 18

Sharing Medication Histories 91% of the FPA respondents and 88% of the FACHC respondents agree or strongly agree that having access to patients complete medical histories would be beneficial Yet 75% of FPA respondents and 69% of FACHC respondents do NOT have access to histories from unaffiliated pharmacies The threat that sharing will result in loss of market share is not necessarily the reason for this lack of sharing. 49% of the FPA respondents and 56% of the FACHC respondents have only slight or no concern for this potential outcome. 19

Concluding Thoughts E-prescribing is occurring regularly in both community and institutional pharmacies in Florida but NOT for controlled substances Users are satisfied and find the systems easy to use but few without an e-prescription system plan to implement one within the next 6 months Stable utilization in future 20