Scoring Guide. NAEP released item, grade 12

Similar documents
NAEP released item, grade 8

English II Writing. Persuasive Writing Rubric

Grade 4. Expository Writing Rubric

TEKS: 8.14A, 8.14B, 8.14C, 8.14D, 8.14E, 8.18A, 8.18B, 8.18C

EXJ 201. Show a little understanding of the persuasive purpose of the task but neglect to take or to maintain a position on the issue in the prompt

AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2013 SCORING GUIDELINES

Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium: English/Language Arts Practice Test Scoring Guide Grade 11 Performance Task

How To Write A Task For Ielts

Common Core Writing Rubrics, Grade 3

!!!!!! "#$%&!$'!()&!"*+!,%-(-'.!+&/(!,$0!,%-(-'.!,$%1/)$2! "(34&'(!,&5-'6%!"&%-&/!!

Rubrics for Assessing Student Writing, Listening, and Speaking High School

AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2009 SCORING GUIDELINES

Montgomery County Public Schools Advanced English Semester A Exam Review

AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2015 SCORING GUIDELINES

English Language Proficiency (055)

Running head: AMERICAN REVOLUTION 1

Correct Answers and Difficulty Levels for the Official SAT Practice Test

Grading Rubrics PHD Program MGMT 7710 Human Resources Management Course participation

English II. Persuasive Scoring Guide. March 2015

AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2015 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP ENGLISH LITERATURE AND COMPOSITION 2008 SCORING GUIDELINES

Rubric of All Rubrics

The Old Man and The Sea

AP ENGLISH LITERATURE AND COMPOSITION 2009 SCORING GUIDELINES

Texas Success Initiative (TSI) Assessment

Grading Rubrics PHD Program MGMT 7702 The nature of management research

Staten Island Technical High School Forensic Science

I VE GOT A GREAT IDEA!

What is your name? Do you think it reveals something about your identity and where you come from? If so, what does it reveal?

English II Writing. Persuasive Scoring Guide April 2013

AP ENGLISH LITERATURE AND COMPOSITION 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES

Anne Frank: The Power of One

AP ENGLISH LITERATURE AND COMPOSITION 2014 SCORING GUIDELINES

Language Arts Literacy Areas of Focus: Grade 6

WritePlacer Guide with Sample Essays

FUNCTIONAL SKILLS ENGLISH - WRITING LEVEL 2

Alignment of the National Standards for Learning Languages with the Common Core State Standards

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International General Certificate of Secondary Education

French Language and Culture. Curriculum Framework

English I. Expository Scoring Guide. April 2014

FAQ: Outlining, Drafting, and Editing

Grade 4 Writing Curriculum Map

Grade 4 Writing. Expository Scoring Guide. March 2015

NEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS

Test Specifications for Written Composition

AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2008 SCORING GUIDELINES

PREP-009 COURSE SYLLABUS FOR WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS

AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES

Explain Yourself: An Expository Writing Unit for High School

AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B)

MS Health Care Administration ( )

BS in Social Sciences

Texas Success Initiative (TSI) Assessment. Interpreting Your Score

AP English Literature & Composition 2002 Scoring Guidelines

FOR TEACHERS ONLY The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION. ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (Common Core)

City University of Hong Kong. Information on a Course offered by Department of English with effect from Semester A in 2012/2013

0510 ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE

Bilingual Education Assessment Urdu (034) NY-SG-FLD034-01

Appendix 14: Sample Writing Frames

Guide for the Personal Statement For Admission to the Master of Sports Science Degree

Units of Study 9th Grade

SCORED WRITING SAMPLES: BENCHMARK 1

WRIT 107 INTRODUCTION TO ACADEMIC WRITING UNIT #1: COMPARE/CONTRAST WRITING. The texts for Unit 1 include essays from: The Kindness of Strangers:

the treasure of lemon brown by walter dean myers

A Guide to Cambridge English: Preliminary

Montgomery County Public Schools English 9B Exam Review

Writing Rubrics. Eighth Grade. Based on the California State Writing Standards. Created by Miller seventh grade team 4/05..

Master Syllabus. Learning Outcomes. ENL 260: Intermediate Composition

MS Human Resource Management ( )

AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES

FCAT Writing. Technical Assistance Paper BASELINE WRITING ASSESSMENT

MS Health Care Administration ( )

Narrative Writing Conference Planner

Student Performance Q&A:

Professor Gabriel Aquino

IACBE Advancing Academic Quality in Business Education Worldwide

Language Arts Literacy Areas of Focus: Grade 5

BUSN-220 COURSE SYLLABUS FOR BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS. Carolyn Nelson Instructor

GCSE English Language

Before you read an article, jot down some pros and cons of TV-watching in the chart below. Is Watching TV Good for Kids? PROS

Class Time: Monday & Wednesday 5:30 to 9:30 PM Room: Building 4 Room 154 -

Writing and Presenting a Persuasive Paper Grade Nine

B.A. in Elementary Education

Georgia High School Writing Test (GHSWT) Writing Topic and Sample Papers Fall 2007

Interpretation of Test Scores for the ACCUPLACER Tests

Writing an Introductory Paragraph for an Expository Essay

Writing Essays. SAS 25 W11 Karen Kostan, Margaret Swisher

Common Core State Standards Sample Student Writing Scored with 6+1 Traits Rubric

AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B)

Lesson: Editing Guidelines and Response Writing: Essay Exam (Part 1)

Organizing an essay the basics 2. Cause and effect essay (shorter version) 3. Compare/contrast essay (shorter version) 4

Assessment of Learning Structure for MBA Cluster Programs

INTERNET ACCESS AT SCHOOL

MBA Business Administration ( )

Transcription:

Who are our heroes? The media attention given to celebrities suggests that these people are today's Scoring Guide Score & Description Excellent Takes a clear position and supports it consistently with well-chosen reasons and/or examples; may use persuasive strategy to convey an argument. Focused and well organized, with effective use of transitions. Consistently exhibits variety in sentence structure and precision in word choice. Errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation are few and do not interfere with understanding. Skillful Takes a clear position and supports it with pertinent reasons and/or examples through much of the response. Well organized, but may lack some transitions. Exhibits some variety in sentence structure and uses good word choice; occasionally, words may be used inaccurately. Errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation do not interfere with understanding. Sufficient Takes a clear position and supports it with some pertinent reasons and/or examples; there is some development. Generally organized, but has few or no transitions among parts. Sentence structure may be simple and unvaried; word choice is mostly accurate. Errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation do not interfere with understanding. Uneven May be characterized by one or more of the following: Takes a position and provides uneven support; may lack development in parts or be repetitive OR is no more than a well-written beginning. Organized in parts of the response; other parts are disjointed and/or lack transitions. Exhibits uneven control over sentence boundaries and sentence structure; may exhibit some inaccurate word choices. Errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation sometimes interfere with understanding. Insufficient

May be characterized by one or more of the following: Takes a position but is very undeveloped. Disorganized or unfocused in much of the response OR clear but very brief. Minimal control over sentence boundaries and sentence structure; word choice may often be inaccurate. Errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation interfere with understanding in much of the response. Unsatisfactory May be characterized by one or more of the following: Attempts to take a position (addresses topic) but position is very unclear OR takes a position but provides minimal or no support; may only paraphrase the prompt. Little or no apparent organization. Minimal or no control over sentence boundaries and sentence structure; word choice may be inaccurate in much or all of the response. Errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation severely impede understanding across the response. Excellent - Student Response

Scorer Comments: Excellent responses offered consistent support for their positions in the form of well-chosen reasons and examples. In the sample response below, the writer uses the strategy of question/answer to advance and maintain the focus of his or her argument: "So, what about the sports stars we call heroes?" The response is also outstanding in its consistent variety in sentence structure and precise word choices. Skillful - Student Response

Scorer Comments: Skillful responses took clear positions and supported them with reasons or examples in parts of the response. The response shown below supports a clear position with pertinent examples (such as the friend's grandmother) in much of the response. The paper is well organized overall, but does not consistently exhibit well-executed sentence variety or good word choices. Sufficient - Student Response

Scorer Comments: "Sufficient" responses took clear positions and developed those positions with some pertinent reasons or examples. Ideas were generally related with few transitions. The response below makes a clear argument that heroes are those who perform courageous acts, but lacks development and is only generally organized, due to an absence of transitions among ideas. Uneven - Student Response

Scorer Comments: "Uneven" responses took a clear position and offered support, but that support was often lacking in development. This response also has some typical "Uneven" grammatical errors, inaccurate word choices, and some minor difficulties with sentence structure that occasionally interfere with understanding. Insufficient - Student Response

Scorer Comments: "Insufficient" responses attempted to take positions and offer support but were very brief, disorganized, or marked by severe errors in sentence control and/or grammar. The "Insufficient" response below is underdeveloped. Unsatisfactory - Student Response Scorer Comments: "Unsatisfactory" responses responded to the prompt but either had positions that were very unclear or offered no coherent support for a position. The response below has errors in sentence structure and word choice severe enough to interfere with understanding across the response. 2002 National Performance Results Score Percentage of Students

Unsatisfactory 3% Insufficient 9% Uneven 23% Sufficient 34% Skillful 22% Excellent 9% Note: These results are for public and nonpublic school students. Percentages may not add to 100 due to rounding. Purpose for Writing Persuasive Writing Persuasive writing emphasizes the reader. Its primary aim is to influence others to take some action or to bring about change. Persuasive writing may contain much information facts, details, examples, comparisons, statistics, or anecdotes. Its main purpose, however, is not simply to inform but to persuade. This type of writing involves a clear awareness of what arguments might most affect the audience being addressed. Writing persuasively also requires the use of critical thinking skills such as analysis, inference, synthesis, and evaluation. Persuasive writing is called for in a variety of situations. It may involve responding to a request for advice by giving an opinion and providing sound reasons to support it. It may also involve presenting an argument in such a way that a particular audience will find it convincing. When there is opposition, persuasive writing may entail refuting arguments that are contrary to the writer's point of view. In all persuasive writing, authors must choose the approach they will use. They may, for instance, use emotional or logical appeals or an accommodating or demanding tone. Regardless of the situation or approach, persuasive writers must be concerned with having a particular desired effect upon their readers, beyond merely adding to knowledge of the topic presented.