Policy elements for post-accident management. in the event of a nuclear accident. The French approach

Similar documents
Science, Values and Stakeholder Dialogue: NEA Experience in Fukushima. Dr Ted Lazo Radiation Protection and Radioactive Waste Management Division

POLICY ELEMENTS FOR POST-ACCIDENT MANAGEMENT IN THE EVENT OF NUCLEAR ACCIDENT

Long-Term Recovery from Nuclear Accidents

The Follow-up IAEA International Mission on Remediation of Large Contaminated Areas Off-Site the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant

RADIATION MONITORING UNDER EMERGENCY CONDITIONS

Nuclear Emergency Response Program

Fukushima Accident: Radioactive Releases and Potential Dose Consequences

Exposures from the Events at the NPPs in Fukushima following the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami

National Emergency Plan for Nuclear Accidents. December 2005

Guidelines for Reporting Radiological Incidents to the Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland

List of Contents Section 10, Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection Legislation Page

Response of SCK CEN to the Fukushima Nuclear Accident in the Context of the Protection of Belgian Citizens

International Conference on Global Emergency Preparedness and Response

Issues Associated with Decision Making in Long-Term Recovery Following a Nuclear or Radiological Terrorism Incident 11035

Examination of National and International Impacts of Adoption of ICRP Recommendations

IAEA INTERNATIONAL FACT FINDING EXPERT MISSION OF THE NUCLEAR ACCIDENT FOLLOWING THE GREAT EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI

Elements of the Russian Emergency Preparedness Program

Results of Airborne Monitoring by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology and the U.S. Department of Energy

what to do in the event of a nuclear alert?

Training in Emergency Preparedness and Response

COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2013/51/EURATOM

Nuclear accidents and radioactive contamination of foods 30 March 2011

Nuclear Safety. Policy

Massive radiological releases profoundly differ from controlled releases

Status, responsibilities and missions of ANDRA (France)

Legislation in Ukraine about the Radiological Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident

RC-17. Alejandro V. Nader National Regulatory Authority Montevideo - Uruguay

MAJOR NUCLEAR OR RADIOLOGICAL ACCIDENTS

EMERGENCY RESPONSE FOR THE AREA SURROUNDING THE CATTENOM NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Role and tasks of Arpa Piemonte in controlling and monitoring of ionizing and non ionizing radiation. G.. d Amored

RENCEE SAFETY MARIES

All-State Radiation Monitoring Network in the Czech Republic

Fukushima: the crisis continues. Dr Ian Fairlie Consultant on Radiation in the Environment London, United Kingdom

MAJOR NUCLEAR OR RADIOLOGICAL ACCIDENTS

How To Help With The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant

International Experience with Stakeholder Involvement in the Rehabilitation of Contaminated Areas. Dr. Ted Lazo OECD Nuclear Energy Agency

Damage of Fukushima Nuclear Accident and a new compensation scheme

The Ministry of the Environment. National Radiation Safety Development Plan

Master and Doctorate Program "Nuclear Science and Technology" Technical University of Madrid (UPM) 4 February 2015, Madrid, Spain

IAEA Action Plan on Nuclear Safety 1

Bonn Call-for-Action Joint Position Statement by the IAEA and WHO

Environmental Radiation Monitoring in Taiwan

Radiological Protection Principles concerning the Natural Radioactivity of Building Materials

AUSTRIA NATIONAL REPORT OF AUSTRIA ON EPR ARRANGEMENTS

Draft IAEA Action Plan on Nuclear Safety

JRodos: An off-site emergency management system for nuclear accidents

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS: National Response to I-131 from Japan Nuclear Power Plant March 27, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

RADIATION MONITORING NETWORK OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC

Decontamination Project in Fukushima Prefecture Conducted by Japanese Government

National Radiation Air Monitoring Network National Environmental Monitoring Conference San Antonio -- August 6, 2013

Position paper on the implications of deep sea disposal of radioctive waste

Mathematical Competitive Game False Alarms in a Sensor Network

Environmental Protection: Environmental Protection Policies, Programs and Procedures REGDOC-2.9.1

Report of the Secretary-General I. INTRODUCTION

318 DECREE. of the State Office for Nuclear Safety of 13 June 2202,

What you should do if there is a NUCLEAR EMERGENCY at the Devonport Site

Assessment of environmental radiation monitoring data in Hungary following the Fukushima accident

EPA Radionuclides Rule and the RadNet Program

Other provisions in force on qualification or training in relation to radiological protection are the following:

Cancer - Dose Assessment and Risk Factors

MISSION REPORT ON THE INTEGRATED NUCLEAR INFRASTRUCTURE REVIEW (INIR)

BASIC SAFETY STANDARDS (2010) TITLE I SUBJECT MATTER AND SCOPE

Joint Radiation Emergency Management Plan of the International Organizations

NORM MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES & PRINCIPLES

INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

About Pure Earth and the Toxic Site Identification Program

Nuclear Emergency Management: driven by precedent or international guidance?

COMPARISON OF SOFTWARE FOR RESCUE OPERATION PLANNING DURING AN ACCIDENT IN A NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Application Note. ipix A Gamma imager to support various applications

The Role of the United States Food Safety and Inspection Service After the Chemobyl Accident

Chernobyl, its role during past 30 Years and at present

CONVENTION ON NUCLEAR SAFETY

GAO. NUCLEAR REGULATION Regulatory and Cultural Changes Challenge NRC. Testimony

NOTICE TO MANUFACTURERS OF RADIOTHERAPY MEDICAL DEVICES

RODOS: Decision Support System for Off-Site Emergency Management in Europe

UK RESPONSE PLAN AND RADIOACTIVE INCIDENT MONITORING NETWORK (RIMNET) 3: BRIEFING NOTE

Radiation and Thyroid Cancer. Technical Considerations for the Use of Stable Iodine after a Nuclear Reactor Accident in Australia

HLG_p( )_117 ENSREG_REPORT_2013. Report of the European Nuclear Safety Regulator's Group ENSREG

The accident was first notified to the Science and Technology Agency (STA) on 30 September 1999 at

The Fukushima Daiichi Accident

Centre International de Droit Comparé de l Environnement CIDCE. Comments on the Zero draft of the Post 2015 framework for disaster risk reduction

Requirements and Challenges for a Nuclear Forensic System

IAEA Safety Standards

THE PRINCIPLE OF JUSTIFICATION

Dilemmas in Emergency Management & Response. Bruria Adini Wiesel, PhD Emergency & Disaster Management Division Israeli Ministry of Health

Håkan Lorentz Barsebäck Kraft AB Box 524, SE Löddeköpinge, Sweden

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Better Regulation "Toolbox" This Toolbox complements the Better Regulation Guideline presented in in SWD(2015) 111

Guidelines on preparation for and management of a financial crisis

8 Emergency Operating Procedures (EOPs) and Severe Accident Management Guidelines (SAMGs) - Issue 06

Some Lessons Learned on Medical Preparedness and Response from Several Types of Nuclear Power Plant Accidents

Third Dialogue on the Rehabilitation of Living Conditions after the Fukushima Accident - With a focus on improving the quality of food products -

What if... A nuclear waste accident scenario in Los Angeles, CA. Richard Wiles James R. Cox. June 27,

CROM An Introduction. Juan Carlos Mora Radiation Protection for the Public and the Environment CIEMAT

Preparing for the Resolution of a Troubled Bank. Have Your Toolkit Ready

CAPABILITY 7: Mass Care

Report of the Chernobyl Forum Expert Group Environment

Presentation by Mrs. Ton Nu Thi Ninh Former Ambassador of Viet Nam to EU Former Vice Chair Foreign Affairs Committee, National Assembly of Viet Nam

Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh

On the current needs in European decision support tools for contaminated areas

Transcription:

Policy elements for post-accident management in the event of a nuclear accident: The French approach Jean-Christophe Niel Director general Autorité de sûreté nucléaire (ASN) Introduction (The CODIRPA activities) Policy elements for post-accident management in the event of a nuclear accident CODIRPA development (new tasks) Conclusion 1

The CODIRPA activities (2005-2012) The CODIRPA was implemented from 2005 to establish the framework, define, prepare and implement the steps necessary to deal with a post-accident situation The CODIRPA : a pluralistic structure National and local administrations, expert bodies, operators Non-institutional members: NGOs, local elected officials, professional unions, experts and consultants Foreign radiation protection authorities (Germany, Switzerland, Luxemburg) o Thematic working groups (technical reports available on www.asn.fr) Drinking water, foodstuffs, radioactivity measurements, health monitoring, remediation, waste management, protection of emergency workers, compensation, organization of public authorities, information of the public and radiation protection culture o o Two transversal commissions (transition and long term) Test of the doctrine at local level (3 NPP sites and one local community) o 2 international seminars in Paris (Dec. 2007 and May 2011) 2

The CODIRPA scenarios 2 scenarios of nuclear accident affecting a French NPP and leading to a release of radioactive substance in the atmosphere o A short time release < 24 hours o Release leading to : The sheltering of the population living around the NPPs and iodine prophylaxis during the emergency phase on a perimeter < 5 km A level of contamination of locally produced foodstuffs exceeding Euratom ILs at a distance of several tens of kilometers from the NPP Consider both irradiation from radionuclides deposited in the environment and ingestion of contaminated foodstuffs 1 scenario involving atmospheric dispersion of plutonium Leading to consider inhalation of particles and ingestion of contaminated foodstuffs IA1 3

Slide 3 IA1 CFIL : Council Food Intervention Level (traduction des Niveaux Maximaux Admissibles/ NMA) infoasn, 1/3/2013

Policy elements for post-accident management in the event of a nuclear accident (Nov 2012) Policy elements group together : Main document : objectives, principles, key actions and strategic orientations for the transition and long term phases Annex 1 : The first actions to be put in place at the end of the emergency phase Annex 2 : The guidelines for managing transition period (few months) Annex 3 : The guidelines for managing long-term period (several years) Publication in 2012 (www.asn.fr) and wide dissemination to stakeholders Traduction in English and Japanese available and Russian (coming soon). 4

Policy elements for post-accident management in the event of a nuclear accident (Nov 2012) 3 fundamental objectives (strongly connected) protecting the population against the dangers of ionising radiations providing support for members of the population who have suffered the consequences of an accident preparing the social and economic recovery of the affected areas 4 principles (very closed to ICRP 103 and 111) Principle 1 : Anticipation issues relating to nuclear post-accident management must be taken into account immediately once the emergency phase is over, consequently the first actions for the protection of the population must be planned in advance. Principle 2 : Justification Principle 3 : Optimisation Principle 4 : Co-construction and transparency the management of postaccidental situation must involve the stakeholders : population, elected officials, the social economic and communication stakeholders ; transparency of information is linked with co-construction. 5

From emergency to post-accidental: Issues to be faced & management tools Exposition to atmospheric releases Exposition to substances deposited in the environment Starting point of releases Accident monitored Lasting contamination of the environnement Emergency Phase Post-accidental Phase Period of threat Period of releases Period of exit of the emergency phase Transition Period Long term period Organisation ORSEC PPI Organisation dedicated to post-accidental management Triggering of PPI Emergency protection actions are lifted Delineation of the post-accidental zones Emergency protection actions (sheltering / evacuation / iodine tablets) Post-accidental management actions (Displacement, food prohibition, cleaning )

Public protection zone (ZPP) where actions are needed to reduce population exposure Delineation based on dose criteria : Effective dose (external + ingestion) > 10 msv / 1 st month or Thyroid equivalent dose > 50 msv / 1 st month May include a Relocation perimeter If effective dose from external exposure alone > 10 msv/ 1st month Immediate delineation of a PA zoning for the contaminated area : a key point Immediately at the end of the release, by modeling (IRSN) and gamma radiation mapping (HELINUC) Food bans of locally produced food and feedstuffs in ZPP, for a long period

Immediate delineation of the ZPP provides the structural framework for early decisions at the end of the release: For initial protection measures The main protective actions in the ZPP To decide about the long term evacuation and relocation (after sheltering during the early phase) To organize food bans of locally produced food and feedstuffs To engage the first clean-up operations within urban areas For the organization of medical and psychological care, human radiation monitoring, financial support and compensation Opening information centres for the affected populations 8

The main actions in the Territorial surveillance zone (ZST) Immediately at the end of the release, by modeling (IRSN) and gamma radiation mapping (HELINUC) The Territorial surveillance zone (ZST) where actions are needed for the radiological characterisation of environment, foodstuffs, manufactured products and drinking water. Delineation based on the contamination levels of locally produced foodstuffs taking ino account the Euratom Food Intervention Levels (Council regulations Euratom n 3954/87, n 944/89 and n 770/90) ; considering as the most sensitive to radioactive contamination (eg. milk, salads) 9

The main protective actions for the transition period (few months) The transition period (considered as an existing exposure situation ) is characterized by: changes in the radiological situation as well as in the economic and social situation need for a flexible management strategy based on evolving decisionmaking criteria Protection actions implemented at the exit from the emergency phase shall be continued but some of them may evolve: To adapt the initial post-accident zoning to take into account results of the radiological surveillance of the environment To set up a radiation monitoring strategy in order to free locally produced foodstuffs (Euratom FIL s) and manufactured products ( contamination management level to be defined) To gradually replace the temporary waste management solutions selected at the exit from the emergency phase by long-term management solutions ( contamination management level to be defined) 10

Protection of population Reducing population exposure Improving the radiological quality of the environment and living Managing radioactive waste Developing environment monitoring Support for members of the population Receiving the population Addressing public health issues Providing grants and compensation Informing the population. The main actions for the transition period (10 goals) Preparation of the social and economic recovery Improving stakeholder involvement toward an appropriate governance mode. Supporting and re-deploying economic activity. 11

And for the long term period The transition period comes to an end when the situation in the territories can be observed to have stabilized: A relatively good understanding of the contamination in the environment and the population s exposure conditions has developed The post-accidental zone has stabilized The first questions regarding the future of the persons affected have been addressed in a coordinated manner The public authorities have implemented an initial post-accident management plan As a result of the actions already initiated, during the long term it is important to: Provide support to those who have chosen to remain Continue to monitor radiological conditions Ensure the radiological, medical and epidemiological follow-up of persons Improve the radiological quality of products Maintain and redeploy activity across the territory

CODIRPA development under the new governmental action plan 1. The new governmental action plan on nuclear emergency (2013) takes into account CODIRPA recommendations (the main PA protective actions in the ZPP decided at the end of the emergency phase) 2. The recent decision of the PM to update local emergency plans (each NPP site), introducing the main PA protective actions. CODIRPA will : Assist in in the preparation of tools to support the local declination Participate in the dialogue with state services, in charge of the preparedness at the territorial level 3. The recent decision of the PM requesting to ministries (health, agriculture, environment, economy, ) to develop road maps, taking into account the CODIRPA recommendations (transition period) 13

CODIRPA development (2013-2018) 3 new objectives 1. Accompany the preparation of the post-accident management at the territorial level (on each NPP site) Transfer the doctrine to the elected officials, associations, economic stakeholders Ensure the information, training of local stakeholders 2.Test and complete the post-accidental doctrine Take into account various accident scenarios, including those involving long-term release of radioactivity in environment Analyze the feedback from real accidents (Fukushima, Chernobyl) and from crisis exercises Further some topics related to the beginning of the transition period (sea contamination, management of manufactured products, waste management, stake holders involvement...) 3. To take into account HERCA works (WGE), to organize exchanges with neighboring countries and to participate to international organizations works (IAEA, WHO, NEA) 14

Conclusions The development and publication of the Policy elements for post-accident management in the event of a nuclear accident is an important first step in preparing for the management of nuclear post-accident situations ASN recommends to continue and intensify the process of preparation: by initiating the planning of the first protective actions to be implemented at the end of the emergency phase, to be able to organize it quickly in case of nuclear accident by preparing in advance the health, social and economic elements that would be necessary to establish, in the first months after the accident, the first national plan for the management of contaminated territories 15