KUNARAC, KOVAČ & VUKOVIĆ

Similar documents
JUDGEMENT OF TRIAL CHAMBER II IN THE KUNARAC, KOVA^ AND VUKOVI] CASE

IN THE APPEALS CHAMBER. Mr. Hans Holthuis. 12 June 2002 PROSECUTOR V DRAGOLJUB KUNARAC RADOMIR KOVAC AND ZORAN VUKOVIC JUDGEMENT

C A S E I N F O R M A T I O N S H E E T. Chief of the General Staff of the Yugoslav Army ( Vojska Jugoslavije or VJ )

NOT AN OFFICIAL DOCUMENT. - Sentenced to 5 years imprisonment

IN THE TRIAL CHAMBER. Judge Florence Ndepele Mwachande Mumba, Presiding Judge David Hunt Judge Fausto Pocar PROSECUTOR

Prosecuting Genocide: The ICTY and the Future of International Criminal Justice

Bosnia and Herzegovina

IN THE APPEALS CHAMBER PROSECUTOR DU[KO TADIC APPEAL JUDGEMENT ON ALLEGATIONS OF CONTEMPT AGAINST PRIOR COUNSEL, MILAN VUJIN

Sexual Violence as Weapon of War. By Lydia Farah Lawyer & Legal researcher

SENTENCING IN INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW. Ana Modrić Zagreb Faculty of Law

UPDATED STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA

SUMMARY OF TRIAL CHAMBER JUDGEMENT. Prosecutor v. Kupreskic et al. 14 January 2000

Human Rights Chamber Delivers 5 Decisions on Admissibility and Merits

GETTING TO KNOW THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM

Persecution as a Crime Under International Criminal Law

Amnesty International What Is A Fair Trial?

Stages in a Capital Case from

UNDERSTANDING THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Anne Benson

Chapter 6B STATE ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES. Last Amended: 1 July Manual of Legal Aid

FACTS ABOUT SREBRENICA

Maricopa County Attorney s Office Adult Criminal Case Process

Tunisia. New Constitution JANUARY 2015

Your Criminal Justice System

IN THE APPEALS CHAMBER PROSECUTOR. Zejnil DELALIC, Zdravko MUCIC (aka PAVO ), Hazim DELIC and Esad LANDŽO (aka ZENGA ) ( ^ELEBICI Case ) JUDGEMENT

Decades of Successful Sex Crimes Defense Contact the Innocence Legal Team Now

Naime Ahmeti A DEFENDANT RIGHTS OF THE DEFENDANT IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

MODEL CRIMINAL DEFENSE MENTORING PROGRAM Utah State Bar New Lawyer Training Program

Glossary of Court-related Terms

PRLIĆ et al. The Prosecutor v. Jadranko Prlić, Bruno Stojić, Slobodan Praljak, Milivoj Petković, Valentin Ćorić & Berislav Pušić

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Homicide Case Flowchart...3. Overview of Homicide Trial...4. Location of Local Court Houses...5. General Courtroom Diagram...

ALBERTA S JUSTICE SYSTEM AND YOU

KENTUCKY VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS1

CRIMINAL LAW & YOUR RIGHTS MARCH 2008

Good article to know about your right!!!

RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART THREE A CRIMINAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE APPENDIX

Swedish Code of Statutes

A petty offense is either a violation or a traffic infraction. Such offenses are not crimes.

Glossary of Terms Acquittal Affidavit Allegation Appeal Arraignment Arrest Warrant Assistant District Attorney General Attachment Bail Bailiff Bench

Letter of transmittal

Criminal Justice System Commonly Used Terms & Definitions

RED FLAGS LIABILITY RISKS FOR COMPANIES OPERATING IN HIGH-RISK ZONES

BASIC CRIMINAL LAW. Joe Bodiford. Overview of a criminal case Presented by: Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyer

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

IN THE APPEALS CHAMBER FATMIR LIMAJ HARADIN BALA ISAK MUSLIU PUBLIC JUDGEMENT

Glossary. To seize a person under authority of the law. Police officers can make arrests

What is the "Code Of Service Discipline"?

5. The Model Strategies and Practical Measures are aimed at providing de jure and de

INFORMATION / FACT SHEET CRIME TO TRIAL PROCESS CRIMINAL COURT HEARINGS EXPLAINED

Security Council. United Nations S/2013/308

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR WOODBURY COUNTY. WRITTEN PLEA OF GUILTY AND WAIVER OF RIGHTS (OWI First Offense)

Murder and forced removal at Srebrenica: the joint trial of seven senior Bosnian Serb military officers at the ICTY

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

DESCRIPTION OF THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM FOR DEFENDANTS

Purpose of the Victim/Witness Unit

Information for Crime Victims and Witnesses

An Introduction to the Federal Public Defender=s Office and the Federal Court System

California Judges Association OPINION NO. 56. (Issued: August 29, 2006)

APPLICATION QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE VAWA PILOT PROJECT ON TRIBAL CRIMINAL JURISDICTION

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. Docket No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

PROSECUTION S MARKED-UP INDICTMENT

GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS

HOW A TYPICAL CRIMINAL CASE IS PROSECUTED IN ALASKA

Tarrant County College Police Department

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 3, 2012

STUDENT LEGAL SERVICES THEFT, FRAUD AND POSSESSION OF STOLEN PROPERTY A GUIDE TO THE LAW IN ALBERTA REGARDING OF EDMONTON COPYRIGHT AND DISCLAIMER

A Victim s Guide to Understanding the Criminal Justice System

The Legal System in the United States

A Citizen s Guide to the Criminal Justice System: From Arraignment to Appeal

DECISION ON DEFENCE MOTION FOR TESTIMONY OF DGH-042 TO BE HEARD VIA VIDEO-CONFERENCE LINK

AN INTRODUCTION COURT. Victim Services Department of Justice

Title 15 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE -Chapter 23 ALABAMA CRIME VICTIMS Article 3 Crime Victims' Rights

RHODE ISLAND VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS1

PROCEDURES GOVERNING THE PAYMENT OF CRIMINAL LEGAL AID FEES

General District Courts

Anthony James Lenz and another man, Glenn Anderkay, burglarized and vandalized an Anchorage laundromat in May They smashed the laundromat s

International Criminal Law Services. and

A Victim s Guide to the Capital Case Process

Your Guide to Bail Bonds in Colorado

Understanding the International Criminal Court

WITNESSES AT TRIAL. Case: Doorson v Netherlands. ECHR Article: Article 6 The Right to a Fair Trial Project group: University of Glasgow

Abusive Behaviour and Sexual Harm (Scotland) Bill [AS AMENDED AT STAGE 2]

CRIMINAL PROCEEDING AND DEFENCE RIGHTS IN CANADA

COMPENSATION IN THE CASES OF FORCIBLY MOBILIZED REFUGEES

CHARGED with a CRIME What YOU

PRISONERS INTERNATIONAL TRANSFER (QUEENSLAND) ACT 1997

Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill [AS INTRODUCED]

Criminal Law. Month Content Skills August. Define the term jurisprudence. Introduction to law. What is law? Explain several reasons for having laws.

YOU VE been CHARGED. with a CRIME What YOU. NEED to KNOW. Justice

High School Law Project This program is funded by the Law Foundation of Ontario. Youth Criminal Justice Act. Table of Contents

JCJR. The Journal of Criminal Justice Research RESEARCH ARTICLE

Republika e Kosovës Republika Kosovo - Republic of Kosovo Kuvendi - Skupština - Assembly

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE

International Transfer of Prisoners (South Australia) Act 1998

Idaho Manual on the Rights of Victims of Crime

A Federal Criminal Case Timeline

How To Find A Guilty Verdict In An Accident Accident Case In Anarazona

THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA

General Assembly Security Council

Going to Court as a Witness

FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA (KOSOVO) Amnesty International s recommendations to UNMIK on the judicial system February 2000

Transcription:

NOT AN OFFICIAL DOCUMENT C A S E I N F O R M A T I O N S H E E T FOČA (IT-96-23 and 23/1) KUNARAC, KOVAČ & VUKOVIĆ DRAGOLJUB KUNARAC Convicted of torture, rape and enslavement Leader of a reconnaissance unit of the Bosnian Serb Army (VRS) which formed part of the local Foča Tactical Group - Sentenced to 28 years imprisonment Convicted of: Torture and rape (crimes against humanity and violations of the laws or customs of war) Kunarac raped three victims at his headquarters at Osmana Đikića Street no. 16 in Foča. He aided and abetted the gang-rape of four victims by several of his soldiers. He and two other soldiers raped and threatened to kill a witness and also threatened to kill her son Enslavement (crimes against humanity) Kunarac personally committed the act of enslavement by depriving two women of any control over their lives and treating them as property. RADOMIR KOVAČ Convicted of enslavement, rape and outrages upon personal dignity One of the sub-commanders of the military police of the VRS and a paramilitary leader in the town of Foča - Sentenced to 20 years imprisonment Convicted of: Enslavement (crimes against humanity) Kovač detained two victims in his apartment for a period of about four months. Imprisoning the girls and exercising his de facto power of ownership, Kovač treated the two victims as his property. Rape (crimes against humanity and violations of the laws or customs of war) He raped two victims along with other soldiers. He raped two victims along with other soldiers during the period that they were kept in his apartment. He assisted other soldiers in the rape of three victims. 1

Outrages upon personal dignity (violation of the laws or customs of war) Kovač constantly humiliated and degraded four victims. He forced three victims to dance naked on a table while he watched them. He sold a victim to a man called Dragec for 200 German Marks and handed over another victim to his soldiers. He sold two victims to Montenegrin soldiers for 500 German Marks each. ZORAN VUKOVIĆ Convicted of torture and rape One of the sub-commanders of the military police of the VRS and a member of the paramilitary in the town of Foča - Sentenced to 12 years imprisonment Convicted of: Torture and rape (crimes against humanity and violations of the laws or customs of war) Vuković, along with another soldier, took a victim from the Partizan Sports Hall, Foča, to an apartment nearby and raped her despite knowing that she was only 15 years old. DRAGOLJUB KUNARAC Born 15 May 1960 in Foča, Bosnia and Herzegovina Indictment 26 June 1996; first amended: 19 August 1998; second amended: 3 September 1999; third amended: 1 December 1999 Surrendered 4 March 1998 Transferred to ICTY 5 March 1998 Initial and further 9, 10 and 13 March 1998: on 9 March 1998 pleaded guilty to count 41 and appearances not guilty to all other counts, on 13 March 1998 withdrew his guilty plea; 28 August 1998, pleaded not guilty to all charges Judgement 22 February 2001, sentenced to 28 years' imprisonment Appeals Chamber judgement Serving sentence 12 June 2002, sentence of 28 years' imprisonment affirmed 12 December 2002, transferred to Germany to serve the remainder of his sentence; credit was given for time served since 4 March 1998 RADOMIR KOVAČ Born 31 March 1961 in Foča, Bosnia and Herzegovina Indictment 26 June 1996; second amended: 3 September 1999; third amended: 1 December 1999 Arrested 2 August 1999, by the multinational Stabilisation Force (SFOR) Transferred to ICTY 2 August 1999 Initial and further appearances 4 August 1999, 24 September 1999, pleaded not guilty to all charges Judgement 22 February 2001, sentenced to 20 years' imprisonment Appeals Chamber judgement 12 June 2002, sentence of 20 years' imprisonment affirmed Sentence served 28 November 2002, transferred to Norway to serve the remainder of his sentence; credit was given for time served since 2 August 1999; early release granted on 27 March 2013 (effective on 30 June 2013) 2

ZORAN VUKOVIĆ Born 6 September 1955 in Brusna, Foča, Bosnia and Herzegovina Indictment 26 June 1996; redacted: 16 February 2000 Arrested 23 December 1999, by SFOR Transferred to ICTY 24 December 1999 Initial appearance 29 December 1999, pleaded not guilty on all counts Judgement 22 February 2001, sentenced to 12 years' imprisonment Appeals Chamber judgement 12 June 2002, sentence of 12 years' imprisonment affirmed Sentence served 28 November 2002, transferred to Norway to serve the remainder of his sentence; credit was given for time served since 23 December 1999; early release granted on 11 March 2008 STATISTICS Trial days 58 Witnesses called by Prosecution 33 Witnesses called by Defence 29 Witnesses called by Chamber 1 Prosecution exhibits 132 Defence exhibits 130 TRIAL Commenced 20 March 2000 Closing arguments 20 22 November 2000 Trial Chamber II Judge Florence Mumba (presiding), Judge David Hunt, Judge Fausto Pocar Counsel for the Prosecution Dirk Ryneveld, Hildegard Uertz-Retzlaff, Peggy Kuo, Daryl Mundis Counsel for the Defence For Dragoljub Kunarac: Slaviša Prodanović and Mara Pilipović For Radomir Kovač: Momir Kolesar and Vladimir Rajić For Zoran Vuković: Goran Jovanović and Jelena Lopičić APPEALS Appeals Chamber Judge Claude Jorda (presiding), Judge Mohamed Shahabuddeen, Judge Wolfgang Schomburg, Judge Mehmet Güney, Judge Theodor Meron Counsel for the Prosecution Anthony Carmona, Norul Rashid, Susan Lamb, Helen Brady Counsel for the Defence For Dragoljub Kunarac: Slaviša Prodanović and Dejan Savatić For Radomir Kovač: Momir Kolesar and Vladimir Rajić For Zoran Vuković: Goran Jovanović and Jelena Lopičić Judgement 12 June 2002 RELATED CASES JANKOVIĆ et al. (IT-96-23/2) FOČA KARADŽIĆ (IT-95-5/18) BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA & SREBRENICA KRAJISNIK (IT-00-39 & 40) BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA KRNOJELAC (IT-97-25) FOČA MILOŠEVIĆ (IT-02-54) KOSOVO, CROATIA & BOSNIA MLADIĆ (IT-09-92) BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA & SREBRENICA PLAVŠIĆ (IT-00-39 AND 40/1) BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA TODOVIĆ & RAŠEVIĆ (IT-97-25/1) FOČA INDICTMENT AND CHARGES Kunarac, Kovač and Vuković were originally named in an indictment confirmed on 26 June 1996 with five other co-accused (Dragan Gagović, Dragan Zelenović, Gojko Janković, Janko Janjić and Radovan Stanković). 3

Kunarac was severed from the original indictment in an amended indictment, which was confirmed on 19 August 1998. On 3 September 1999, a second amended indictment was confirmed which joined charges against Kunarac and Kovač. On 1 December 1999, a third amended indictment against Kunarac and Kovač was confirmed. On 30 July 1999, following his death earlier in the year, the indictment against Gagović was withdrawn. The remaining five accused - Zelenović, Janković, Janjić, Vuković and Stanković - were still in a separate indictment, which was confirmed on 7 October 1999. The original indictment of 26 June 1996 had thus been split into the third amended indictment against Kunarac and Kovač, and the amended indictment against the remaining five accused. Both cases still held the same case number IT-96-23. Following the detention of Vuković on 23 December 1999, a redacted indictment was confirmed on 16 February 2000 (IT-96-23/1). Subsequently, on 15 February 2000, the Trial Chamber issued a decision joining the trials of Kunarac, Kovač and Vuković. On 16 February 2000, the Trial Chamber severed Vuković from the indictment which included five accused, and ordered the Prosecution to file an indictment against Vuković alone (with the information on the other four accused redacted) which was given case number IT-96-23/1. The three accused, Kunarac, Kovač and Vuković stood trial jointly under case number IT-96-23 and 23/1. Kunarac was charged on the basis of individual criminal responsibility (Article 7(1) of the Statute of the Tribunal) and superior criminal responsibility (Article 7(3)), with: Torture, rape and enslavement (crimes against humanity, Article 5), Torture, rape and outrages upon personal dignity (violations of the laws or customs of war, Article 3). Kovač was charged on the basis of individual criminal responsibility with: Rape and outrages upon personal dignity (violations of the laws or customs of war, Article 3), Enslavement and rape (crimes against humanity, Article 5). Vuković was charged on the basis of individual criminal responsibility with: Torture and rape (violations of the laws or customs of war, Article 3; and crimes against humanity, Article 5). THE TRIAL The trial of Kunarac, Kovač and Vuković commenced on 20 March 2000 before Trial Chamber II (Judge Mumba [presiding], Judge Hunt and Judge Pocar). The closing arguments took place on 20 November 2000 for the Prosecution, and on 21 and 22 November 2000 for the Defence. RULE 98bis PROCEEDINGS After the Prosecution concludes the presentation of its evidence, the Defence can ask for the dismissal of the case, if it believes that the presented evidence was insufficient to prove the charges. If the Trial Chamber believes that the Prosecution has not presented sufficient evidence, it can dismiss the case or certain charges and enter a judgement of acquittal before the beginning of the presentation of defence evidence. In accordance with Rule 98bis, on 20 June 2000, Kunarac, Kovač and Vuković filed a joint motion for a judgement of acquittal on certain counts charged in the indictments against them. On 3 July 2000, the Trial Chamber entered a decision of acquittal in favour of Kunarac on count 13 of the third amended indictment (confirmed on 1 December 1999), and held that Vuković had no case to answer in relation to the allegations made by Witness FWS-48 in support of counts 33, 34, 35 and 36 of the redacted indictment (filed on 21 February 2000). Vuković still faced charges with regard to the two other victims under these counts. All remaining counts stood. 4

TRIAL CHAMBER JUDGEMENT The three accused participated in a campaign by Bosnian Serb forces in the wider area of the municipality of Foča, south eastern Bosnia and Herzegovina, from early 1992 up to about mid-1993. The campaign was part of an armed conflict between the Serb and Muslim forces in the wider region of Foča, which existed at all times material to the indictments against the accused. One purpose of the campaign was to cleanse the Foča area of Muslims. One target of the campaign, apart from the Muslim armed forces, were Muslim civilians, and, in this case, Muslim women in particular. The method employed was mostly expulsion through terror. On a general level, the terror expressed itself in the violent destruction of the religious symbols of the Muslims. All mosques in Foča were blown up and the ruins razed to the ground. Civilian Muslim men and women were rounded up in the villages surrounding Foča and even as far as the neighbouring municipalities of Kalinovik and Gacko. The men were separated from the women and children. The men often had to suffer long periods of detention in the Foča KP Dom prison. Detention was without justification. Some were severely mistreated when they were captured. Some were killed on the spot, often in the presence or within earshot of their families. The women and children from the Foča region were taken to collection points, such as Buk Bijela, a settlement south of Foča. From there, they were transferred by bus to Foča High School, where they were detained. Some of them were later taken to other places in and around Foča, such as Partizan Sports Hall and to private houses in Miljevina and Trnovača. There they met women and girls from the other two municipalities. The evidence showed that rape was used by members of the Bosnian Serb armed forces as an instrument of terror. An instrument they were given free rein to apply whenever and against whomsoever they wished. The evidence also showed that it was possible for the Serb forces to set up and maintain detention centres for scores of Muslim women, such as Partizan Sports Hall, next to the municipal police building in Foča, from which women and young girls were taken away on a regular basis to other locations to be raped. The evidence further demonstrated that the authorities who were meant to protect the victims, such as the local police force which had been taken over by the Serbs, turned a blind eye to their suffering. Instead, they helped guard the women, and even joined in their maltreatment when approached by them for help against their oppressors. The evidence showed how Muslim women and girls, mothers and daughters together, were robbed of the last vestiges of human dignity; how women and girls were treated like chattels, pieces of property at the arbitrary disposal of the Serb occupation forces, and more specifically, at the beck and call of the three accused. On 22 February 2001, the Trial Chamber rendered its judgement, convicting the accused as follows: Kunarac, on the basis of individual criminal responsibility (Article 7(1) of the Statute of the Tribunal) of: Torture, rape and enslavement (crimes against humanity, Article 5) Torture and rape (violations of the laws or customs of war, Article 3) Sentence: 28 years imprisonment. Kovač, on the basis of individual criminal responsibility of: Rape and outrages upon personal dignity (violations of the laws or customs of war, Article 3) Enslavement and rape (crimes against humanity, Article 5) Sentence: 20 years imprisonment. 5

Vuković, on the basis of individual criminal responsibility of: Torture and rape (violations of the laws or customs of war, Article 3 and crimes against humanity, Article 5) Sentence: 12 years imprisonment. APPEALS CHAMBER JUDGEMENT On 6 March 2001, Kovač and Vuković filed a notice of appeal against the Trial Chamber judgement and sentence. On 7 March 2001, Kunarac also filed a notice of appeal. The appellants presented several grounds of appeal and alleged errors by the Trial Chamber with respect to various legal issues. The Appeals Chamber rendered its judgement on 12 June 2002 affirming the judgement and sentences handed down by the Trial Chamber. On 28 November 2002, Kovač and Vuković were transferred to Norway to serve their sentences. On 12 December 2002, Kunarac was transferred to Germany to serve his sentence. On 11 March 2008, Vuković was granted early release. On 27 March 2013, Kovač was granted early release, effective on 30 June 2013. 6