Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety (DADSS)

Similar documents
Reducing Impaired-Driving Recidivism Using Advanced Vehicle-Based Alcohol Detection Systems

Issues in Ignition Interlock for Alcohol and Drug Offenders

Evaluating the Effectiveness Of California s Ignition Interlock Program

ALCOHOL IMPAIRED DRIVING POLICY IMPACT. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention

Ignition Interlock Program Impaired Driving Conference October 27, 2015

Conference Summary Report

Should Interlocks Be Required for All DUI Offenders?

Blunt Truth Conference. Debbie Weir MADD CEO

To: Commission From: Christopher Cavaiola and Laura C. Tharney Re: Title 39 Driving while intoxicated Date: July 11, 2011 M E M O R A N D U M

A Review of Research on Vehicle Sanctions in the U.S.A.

Drunk Driving in the United States: A Roadmap for Progress

Lifesavers 2015 J.T. Griffin Chief Government Affairs Officer MADD

COLORADO DUI AND DUID LAW WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW WHEN CHARGED. A White Paper Presented By

Drink driving European Commission Guidelines

Photoelectric Detection Technology

Impaired and Distracted Drivers: A continuing dilemma. Sgt. Thomas Neve Ofc. Alan Haywood

PENALTIES AND FINES FOR ALCOHOL AND DRUG RELATED DRIVING OFFENSES IN NEW YORK STATE

An Analysis of Idaho s Kootenai County DUI Court

Who Should Read This? Your Driving Record. The cost of DUI. Bottom line: It s not worth the risk.

Reaching Zero: Actions to Eliminate Alcohol-Impaired Driving

conservative study showed drunk drivers getting on the road an average of 87 times before the first arrest. iii

dad had 0.26 alcohol level Police: Blood test revealed Fifth DUI Results in Injuries to Children drunken-driving convictions

Ignition Interlocks: Every State, For Every Convicted Drunk Driver

FELONY ALCOHOL INTERVENTION PROGRAM FAIP

Enforcement of Zero Tolerance Laws in the United States

Deterrence Effect of Sting Operations on Driving with a Suspended/Revoked License in Maryland

Can Pennsylvania Laws Be Strengthened to Decrease Driving Under the Influence?

The High Cost of DWI. Ignition interlock license available

Illinois Secretary of State. BAIID (Breath Alcohol Ignition Interlock Device) Law in Illinois

DON T DO IT. How Impaired Driving Can Wreck Your Life FOTOLIA

REPORT TO MOTHERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVING

Alcohol Monitoring Technologies. Presented by Debra Coffey

DWI Conviction Penalties. Penalty Overview

SMART DRUNKEN DRIVER DETECTION AND SPEED MONITORING SYSTEM FOR VEHICLES

Ignition interlock FAQ

Standardized Field Sobriety Tests Is Current Training Enough?

Evaluation of the Use and Benefit of Passive Alcohol Sensors During Routine Traffic Stops

TRAFFIC SAFETY. Alcohol Ignition Interlocks Are Effective While Installed; Less Is Known about How to Increase Installation Rates

A GUIDE TO SUSPENSION & REVOCATION OF DRIVING PRIVILEGES IN NEW YORK STATE

You and the Drinking Driving Laws

CASE STUDY. Pacesetters. Alcohol interlocks for insurance security.

DOT HS August 2012

What Alcohol Does to the Body. Chapter 25 Lesson 2

UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES CAN I BE CONVICTED OF A DUI IN WYOMING?

ILLINOIS STATE PROFILE

Development of an Ignition Interlock Device to Prevent Illegal Driving of a Drunk Driver

Marijuana and driving in the United States: prevalence, risks, and laws

Impaired Motorcycle Riding: Law Enforcement Officers Focus Group Results. Joey W. Syner and Maria E. Vegega

I just got arrested for a State of South Carolina DUI charge. What happens now?

Smartphone and Sensor Based Drunk Driving Prevention System

A System Dynamics Perspective of the New York State Aggravated DWI Law

CANADIAN ROAD SAFETY YOUTH CONFERENCE ENFORCEMENT. Police Constable Mike Taylor # 8855 Toronto Police Service

Drinking and Driving

Traffic Safety Milestones A Short History of Traffic Safety Legislation and Public Policy in New Mexico Since Statehood

T2007 Seattle, Washington

Statement before the Ohio House Judiciary Committee. Alcohol Ignition Interlocks. Michele M. Fields, Esq.

BREAK The LAW PAY The PRICE

CHAPTER 4: DRIVING RECORD INFORMATION

D r u n k D r i v i n g

Traffic Safety Facts. Alcohol-Impaired Driving Data. Overview. Key Findings

You And The Drinking Driving Laws

DUI STOP WHAT TO EXPECT

NEW JERSEY STATE PROFILE

Legal Blood Alcohol Concentration POSITION STATEMENT

Drunk Driving Accident Statistics

MINNESOTA IGNITION INTERLOCK DEVICE PROGRAM GUIDELINES

What To Expect From a DUI Arrest

ALCOHOL, 2013 HIGHLIGHTS

Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee.

Chapter 7: Highway Safety Programs

Wisconsin Community Services, Inc.

NEBRASKA DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI) LAW

Alcohol. Alcohol SECTION 10. Contents:

Transcription:

Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety (DADSS) A Technological Solution to Eliminate Drunk Driving Maria Vegega March, 2010

Why do we need a technological solution? 180,000 Ignition Interlocks Installed 1 Million DWI Convictions Annually 1.5 Million DWI Arrests Annually 94 Million.00-.049 BAC 77%.05-.079 12%.08+ 11% 906 Million driving trips within two hours of consuming alcohol 350 Billion Trips Annually by Car and Light Truck NHTSA, 2003 2

Potential Safety Benefits Potential lives saved in the U.S. in 2005 if vehicle technologies limited driver BAC to specified levels 12,000 8,000 4,000 13,583 Fatalities Driver BAC 0.08% 8,916 1,104 Potential Lives Saved All Drivers Limited to < 0.08% Driver with 1+ prior limited to Zero BAC IIHS, 2007 3

Cooperative Agreement Signed on February 8, 2008 WWW.DADSS.ORG American Coalition for Traffic Safety (ACTS) and NHTSA entered into a cooperative research agreement to explore the feasibility, the potential benefits of, and the public policy challenges associated with a more widespread use of unobtrusive technology to prevent drunk driving Five-year, cooperative program between NHTSA and Industry to develop and test prototypes that may be considered for vehicle integration thereafter Devices are intended to prevent alcohol-impaired drivers (BAC 0.08) from driving their vehicles 4

DADSS Goal and Process WWW.DADSS.ORG End Goal: A non-invasive, seamless technology to measure driver BAC and reduce the incidence of drunk driving Development undertaken as a step-by-step, data-driven process to ensure that effective technologies are developed Intended to support a non-regulatory, market-based approach to preventing drunk driving Devices are intended to prevent alcohol-impaired drivers (BAC 0.08) from driving their vehicles The 5-year goal is a DADSS demonstration vehicle The longer term goal is DADSS in every vehicle 5

DADSS Blue Ribbon Panel Blue Ribbon Panel (BRP) appointed by ACTS and works in an advisory capacity Comprised of experts from various disciplines, Research including scientists Auto manufacturers MADD Suppliers IIHS Alcohol toxicology NHTSA Impairment Foreign governments Ignition interlocks human factors BRP assigned three working groups to assist in effort DADSS Program Management Plan DADSS Performance Specifications DADSS Public Acceptance and Public Policy 6

Criteria for acceptable widespread use Minimum requirements: Quick to use Accurate Small Reliable Repeatable Durable, robust Low cost No or low maintenance Virtually invisible to sober drivers 7

Draft Performance Characteristics WWW.DADSS.ORG Measure BAC non-invasively Capable of sensing driver BACs ranging from 0.01-0.12 g/dl High Accuracy BACs 0.07 0.09 g/dl; SD and SE 0.0003 Determine driver BAC in less than 0.5 seconds from activation and recycle High Reliability 8

DADSS Program Process 2008 2009 2010 2013 Assess Current State of Technology Perform Detailed Technical Review Q2 Phase I Prototype Development Develop DADSS Subsystem Prototype(s) Q3 Phase II Subsystem Development Implement DADSS Subsystem(s) in Vehicle Interior Mockup Perform Interior Mockup Testing Prepare Technology Performance Specifications Perform Technology Assessment Phase I Funding Perform Technology Verification Perform Prototype(s) Lab Testing Bench Tests Human Subjects Tests Phase II Funding Interior Mockup Tests Demo Vehicle Tests Develop DADSS Demonstration Vehicle Perform DADSS Demonstration Vehicle Testing Human Subjects Tests Human Subjects Tests 9

Contracts Awarded to Develop Prototypes Three subcontracts have been awarded to international companies TruTouch Technology USA Alcohol Countermeasure Systems Canada Autoliv Development AB Sweden 12-month period of performance Prototypes to be received June-July, 2010 Bench testing and human subjects testing to be performed June- August, 2010 10

Technology Types 1. Tissue Spectrometry TS subsystems allow estimation of BAC by measuring how much light has been absorbed at particular wavelength from a beam of Near-Infrared (NIR) reflected from the subject skin Touch-based systems that require skin contact 2. Distant Spectrometry IR or laser light is transmitted to the subject from a source that receives and analyses the reflected and absorbed spectrum, to assess chemical content of tissue or liquid in vapor No skin contact is required 11

OVERVIEW OF TECHNOLOGIES BEING DEVELOPED 12

TruTouch Technologies Technology Description Previous device: User s forearm illuminated with NIR light A new, smaller prototype using a square touch pad has been successfully evaluated and demonstrated Provides 6 times improvement in optical signal-to-noise Reduced measurement time Conducive to BAC measurements using the hand Proposed technology is based on miniaturizing the Table-Top square optical touch pad device to meet DADSS requirements Evaluated other locations on the hand for vehicle application 13 13

Tissue Spectrometry Systems Illustration shows one potential adaptation in a vehicle using a stop/start button 14

Distant Spectrometry Contractor - Autoliv AB Technology Description Proposed system is based on current (developed and already demonstrated) KAIA project technology in Europe Use unobtrusive sniffer to detect alcohol in the vehicle Multiple sensors in-vehicle (steering wheel, A-Pillar, etc..) Approach is to identify and quantify small variations of the air constitution alcohol concentration in exhaled breath WWW.DADSS.ORG 15

Distant Spectrometry Contractor - Alcohol Countermeasure Systems WWW.DADSS.ORG Technology Description Similar to Autoliv, proposes to measure concentration of alcohol and carbon dioxide in the cabin air of vehicle Method of remote optical sensing of alcohol from facial region of driver Correlate/compare this measurement with cabin air alcohol concentration Determine BrAC of driver using carbon dioxide as correlant 16

Acceptance among the public and key leaders is critical WWW.DADSS.ORG Technology will be effective only if the driving public welcomes and accepts it: 58 percent of the U.S. public say they support smart technology to prevent driver impairment including alcohol-impaired driving (MADD U.S survey, 2006) 56 percent of the Canadian public agree that all new vehicles should be equipped with a device that can detect alcohol in the driver and prevent starting if the driver is over a preset limit (MADD Canada survey, 2007) 64 percent of the U.S. public say they support advanced technology in all vehicles, if its reliable, to prevent anyone with an illegal BAC from driving their car (IIHS, 2009) 78.6 percent of the U.S. public say they support all cars being equipped with devices that won t let the car start of the driver is drunk (AAA Foundation, 2009). 17

Attitudes toward requiring alcohol ignition interlocks for convicted DWI offenders IIHS, July 2009 WWW.DADSS.ORG 18

Attitudes toward advanced alcohol test technology in all vehicles, if technology shown to be reliable IIHS, July 2009 19

The Challenges WWW.DADSS.ORG Developing a reliable and seamless technology that fulfills all the specifications necessary for use in a vehicle environment Has to work each and every time, over the life of the vehicle, and in a variety of challenging environments Anticipating and addressing likely circumvention strategies by drivers Some drivers are highly motivated to beat the system Needs to be addressed as part of the system design Unintended consequences Are there ways in which longer term driver behavior could be affected that would negatively impact safety in the future? 20

Next steps Test and evaluate Phase I prototypes, June-August 2010 Phase II Request for Proposals, September 2010 Develop demonstration vehicles January 2011- November 2013 Demonstration vehicle bench and human subjects tests, November December 2013 21

QUESTIONS? http://www.dadss.org CONTACT INFORMATION: Maria Vegega,NHTSA maria.vegega@dot.gov Susan Ferguson, Program Manager sferguson@dadss.org Eric Traube, NHTSA eric.traube@dot.gov 22