Professional Pathways for Teachers (PPfT) Appraisal Overview

Similar documents
Special Education Teacher Evaluation Rubric

POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTINUUM OF TEACHING STANDARDS

Mississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric M-STAR

Teacher Rubric with Suggested Teacher and Student Look-fors

DOMAIN 1 FOR READING SPECIALIST: PLANNING AND PREPARATION LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT PROFICIENT EXCELLENT

Greenville City Schools. Teacher Evaluation Tool

Possible examples of how the Framework For Teaching could apply to Instructional Coaches

The MSPA Rubric for Evaluation of School Psychologists

Professional Development Needs Assessment for Teachers

TLE Observation and Evaluation Rubric Teachers

TOOL KIT for RESIDENT EDUCATOR and MENT OR MOVES

TLE Observation and Evaluation Rubric Teachers

NC TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS SAMPLE EVIDENCES AND ARTIFACTS

Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Plan. Maine Township High School District 207. Our mission is to improve student learning.

Teacher Evaluation. Missouri s Educator Evaluation System

Mountain Home School District #193 Formal Evaluation

Framework for Leadership

Delaware Performance Appraisal System

RUBRIC FOR LIBRARY MEDIA SPECIALISTS (LMS) DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION

LITERACY: READING LANGUAGE ARTS

CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT CURRICULUM &PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT DIVISION

Completed Formal Classroom Observation Form

North Carolina TEACHER. evaluation process. Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction

Such alternatives to the above qualifications as the board may find appropriate and acceptable.

Correlation Map of LEARNING-FOCUSED to Marzano s Evaluation Model

School Social Worker - Observation and Performance Appraisal Rubric for Each Domain/Component. Domain 1: Planning and Preparation

CLASSROOM OBSERVATION REPORT. Levels of Performance

APPENDIX A: Examples of Observations and Documentation

Van Buren School District Teacher Evaluation Revised 9/05/14 Speech Language Pathologist

Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Professional Development Self- Assessment Guidebook

Evidence of Learning in the 21 st Century Classroom Classroom Observation Rubric To Guide Leadership for Learning by Instructional Leaders TASK

The Ohio Resident Educator Program Standards Planning Tool Final

Autism Spectrum Disorder Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria Rubric

Lincoln Park Public Schools Special Education Teacher Consultant Evaluation

Section III. An Excellent Christian Teacher. Characteristics and Expectations. GRCS Handbook 1

FRAMEWORK OF SUPPORT: SCHOOL-LEVEL PRACTICE PROFILE

Professional Development Electronic Plan for Teachers

Silicon Valley Mathematics Initiative Student Focused Math Content Coaching

CCSD CLASS KEYS CLASSROOM TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM PERFORMANCE RUBRIC WITH EXAMPLES OF TEACHER EVIDENCE

Indiana Wesleyan University Differentiated Lesson Plan Physical Education 2008 NASPE Standards

Special Education Teacher

Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System. Teacher Evaluation Process Manual

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Instructional Technology Facilitators

Georgia Department of Education School Keys: Unlocking Excellence through the Georgia School Standards

2014 School Counselor Performance Appraisal Rubric SAU 21

Principles of Data-Driven Instruction

Model for Practitioner Evaluation Manual SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST. Approved by Board of Education August 28, 2002

Domain 1 for Special Education: Planning and Preparation Component Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Proficient Excellent

Self Assessment. Introduction and Purpose of the Self Assessment Welcome to the AdvancED Self Assessment.

Albemarle County Schools Teacher Performance Appraisal (TPA) Rubrics

FRAMEWORK FOR EFFECTIVE TEACHING. Newark Public Schools Teacher Performance Evaluation

CASS Practice Standards: Reflective Tool and Rubric

I. Students succeed because teachers plan with individual learning results in mind.

NORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOLS SUMMATIVE SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER EVALUATION. Summative Evaluation Directions

Teachers Demonstrate Leadership

Overview of Performance Management

Section Two: Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession

Self-Assessment Duval County School System. Level 3. Level 3. Level 3. Level 4

NPS Formative Assessment Report Form (Counseling, Psychologists, and Social Workers)

RUBRIC ASSESSMENT: Online Educators

SPEECH LANGUAGE PATHOLOGIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

Model for Instructional Improvement. Teacher Evaluation

SASED CERTIFIED SCHOOL NURSE POST OBSERVATION FEEDBACK FORM DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION. Conference Date

Teacher Performance Evaluation System TPES

RATING A TEACHER OBSERVATION TOOL. Five ways to ensure classroom observations are focused and rigorous

TEACHER DEVELOPMENT & EVALUATION HANDBOOK

SALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT MENTOR SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE ASSESSMENT/REFLECTION LOG 2 nd and 3 rd Year Provisional Teachers

APPR. Supplement B2. Specialized Services (School Psychologists, Counselors, Social Workers) August 30, 2012

Principal has shared the school vision and goals with the staff. A process for developing a school vision and goals is not evident.

Rubrics for Assessing Student Writing, Listening, and Speaking High School

Framework for Teaching Possible Evidence List

DANIELSON FRAMEWORK: PUPIL PERSONNEL PROFESSIONALS: SOCIAL WORKERS

How To Be A School Social Worker

08X540. School For Community Research and Learning 1980 Lafayette Avenue School Address: Bronx, NY 10473

ILLINOIS CERTIFICATION TESTING SYSTEM

Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation

Counselor Summative Assessment: Evaluation Process

ADEPT Performance Standards. for. Classroom-Based Teachers

How To Pass A Queens College Course

Oak Park School District. Administrator Evaluation Program

Principal Appraisal Overview

Norfolk Public Schools Teacher Performance Evaluation System

ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARDS (2013)

Marion County Instruction Evaluation System

RUBRIC FOR CHILD STUDY TEAM SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION

Course-Based Key Assessment #4 ESOL Teaching Portfolio and Reflective Summary of Field Experience Used in TESL 5040 Practicum in ESOL

Developing (3.0 to 3.4 points) (B, B+) 1a.2) Uses language somewhat appropriate to developmental & skill level. developmental & skill level

NATIONAL COMPETENCY-BASED TEACHER STANDARDS (NCBTS) A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT GUIDE FOR FILIPINO TEACHERS

How To Teach Literacy

Library Media Specialist Rubric

Illinois Professional Teaching Standards

Transcription:

Professional Pathways for Teachers (PPfT) Appraisal Overview Instructional Practice 2 Announced Observations o One Fall, One Spring o Two Appraisers 4 Classroom Visits o Two Fall, Two Spring Rubric covers 7 Strands of observable teaching behaviors Professional Growth and Responsibilities Rubric that covers 5 strands related to professionalism Completed toward the end of the year Student Growth 1 Student Learning Objective (SLO) School- wide Value- added

Student Engagement Students are rarely engaged Students are somewhat engaged Students are actively engaged Students are actively engaged during direct instruction as during direct instruction as indicated during direct instruction as indicated during direct instruction as indicated indicated by not completing instructional activities, by some completion of instructional activities, some responsiveness to by completion of instructional activities, responsiveness to by completion of instructional activities, responsiveness to unresponsiveness to questions, questions, following of some of questions, and accurate following of questions, accurate following of inaccurate following of teacher directions, and not asking appropriate questions. teacher directions, and asking of some questions. teacher directions. teacher directions, asking of appropriate questions, and communicating lesson content to each other. The lesson moves at a pace in The lesson moves at a moderate The lesson moves at a pace, such The lesson moves at an which students are frequently disengaged or left with nothing meaningful to do pace but students are sometimes disengaged or left with nothing to do Teacher does not explain Explanations of concepts are concepts and/or does not engage unclear or disorganized and/or uses students with instructional strategies only one instructional strategy to engage students Students are disengaged during independent and/or group work Teacher does not provide a balance between direct instruction and student- centered learning so that students are not able to apply their learning Teacher does not use instructional time so that students are engaged from the beginning of class to the end of class Instructional Practice Students display an effort to meet minimum expectations in independent and/or group work Teacher provides more direct instruction than student- centered learning but students have an opportunity to apply their learning Teacher uses instructional time so that some students are engaged from the beginning of class to the end of class that students are rarely disengaged or left with nothing meaningful to do (for example, after finishing the assigned work, or while waiting for one student to complete a problem in front of the class) appropriate pace such that students are rarely disengaged, and/or students who finish assigned work early have something else meaningful to do that relates to the objective. Teacher clearly explains concepts Teacher clearly explains concepts and uses various instructional strategies to engage students in a way that actively involves students in the learning process Students display active engagement in independent and group work as indicated by participation of most group members working cooperatively and/or independent work meeting lesson expectations Teacher provides a balance between direct instruction and student- centered learning so that students are able to apply their learning Teacher effectively uses instructional time so that students are engaged from the beginning of class to the end of class Students display active engagement in independent and group work as indicated by participation of all group members working cooperatively and/or independent work goes beyond the lesson expectations Students take a leadership role during the lesson and require little guidance from the teacher when appropriate Students assume responsibility for utilizing instructional time

Assessment and Feedback Teacher infrequently or never Teacher checks for Teacher routinely checks for Teacher implements a system of checks for understanding understanding using only one method understanding using a variety of methods checking for understanding that results in a substantive awareness of all students' progress and needs that guides instruction during the Teacher does not diagnose misunderstandings and misconceptions or the checks are ineffective in accurately assessing student understanding Teacher does not answer student questions or responds to their needs and interests during a lesson. Does not reteach. Teacher provides no opportunity for students to engage in self- assessment Teacher provides incorrect feedback or no feedback during a lesson Teacher inconsistently diagnoses misunderstandings and misconceptions and/or responds with incomplete scaffolding Teacher occasionally answers student questions or responds to their needs and interests during a lesson or reteaches content when necessary Teacher provides limited opportunity for students to engage in self- assessment Teacher provides limited feedback during a lesson that affirms correctly understood content, clarifies misunderstood content, and extends student thinking Teacher accurately diagnoses misunderstandings and misconceptions and responds with appropriate scaffolding Teacher answers student questions or responds to their needs and interests during a lesson or reteaches content when necessary Teacher provides an opportunity for students to engage in self- assessment Teacher provides specific feedback during a lesson that affirms correctly understood content, clarifies misunderstood content, and extends student thinking lesson Teacher anticipates student misunderstandings and misconceptions and preemptively addresses them Teacher provides an opportunity for other students to answer each others' questions and supplements answers to ensure understanding if needed Students self- assess on their understanding of lesson objectives and provide feedback to the teacher or their peers Teacher provides specific feedback during a lesson that affirms correctly understood content, clarifies misunderstood content, and allows students to explain why they have or have not met the expectations

Differentiation Teacher does not ensure all Teacher ensures that some Teacher ensures that all Teacher ensures that all students have access to the lesson and are appropriately challenged students have access to the lesson and are appropriately challenged Teacher does not provide additional supports or enrichment in order to meet the needs and learning style of each student Teacher does not provide multiple ways to engage lesson content Teacher occasionally provides additional supports or enrichment, in order to meet the needs and learning style of each student Teacher provides two ways to engage lesson content students have access to the lesson and are appropriately challenged (for example, teacher adjusts depth, pace and delivery of content or design content or processes to address needs) Teacher provides additional supports or enrichment in order to meet the needs and learning style of each student (for example, flexible grouping) Teacher provides multiple ways to engage lesson content students have access to the lesson and students take ownership of challenging themselves Students know their needs and actively seek/design learning experiences or tasks that meet their needs and learning styles Teacher provides multiple ways to engage lesson content that includes various learning styles and offers individualized instruction according to the student's needs

Problem- Solving and Critical Thinking Teacher does not create Teacher creates limited Teacher creates situations that Teacher creates situations that opportunities for analysis, problem solving, or drawing conclusion. Teacher does not develop and use various instructional strategies that challenge students Teacher does not probe for higher- level thinking through questioning strategies opportunities for students to analyze, problem solve, and/or draw conclusions. Teacher develops and uses one or two instructional strategies that challenge students Teacher probes for higher- level thinking through questioning strategies occasionally challenge students(independently or with peers) to analyze, problem solve, and/ or draw their own conclusions. Teacher develops and uses various instructional strategies that challenge students to think independently or critically about the content Teacher probes for higher- level thinking through questioning strategies challenge students(independently or with peers) to analyze, problem solve, and/ or draw their own conclusions and students communicate their reasoning processes Teacher develops and uses instructional strategies that allow students to design and think through inquiry based problems or projects Students exhibit higher- level thinking through their communicating with each other

Classroom Expectations Objectives are not clear Objectives are somewhat clear Objectives provide clear Objectives are revisited during expectations the lesson and students are provided the opportunity to articulate the expectations Teacher does not know and Teacher knows and understands Teacher knows and understands Students know their levels and understand student levels or does not provide activities which require students to apply their learning. Teacher does not provide opportunities for enrichment discussions Classroom environment does not display student work and exemplars Teacher delivers a lesson that is not aligned to state standards and district curriculum requirements some student levels and provides activities that require students to apply their learning. Teacher provides limited opportunities for enrichment discussion Classroom environment displays some student work or exemplars Teacher delivers a lesson that is somewhat aligned to state standards and district curriculum requirements student levels and provides challenging activities that require students to apply and extend their learning. Teacher provides multiple opportunities for enrichment discussion Classroom environment displays student work and exemplars Teacher delivers a lesson that is aligned to state standards and district curriculum requirements Students are not engaged in Students are engaged in some Students are engaged in authentic tasks, real world problems, or substantial endeavors. authentic tasks, real world problems, or substantial endeavors. authentic tasks, real world problems, or substantial endeavors choose challenging activities that require them to apply and extend their learning. Students generate enrichment discussions or extensions in response to the lesson content Classroom environment displays student work and exemplars with assessment criteria or explanation of selection Teacher delivers a lesson that is aligned to state standards and district curriculum requirements and has cross- curricular connections to key concepts Students are engaged in multiple authentic tasks, real world problems, or substantial endeavors as evidence of their ownership of independent and group work

Routines and Procedures Teacher does not clearly Teacher communicates some Teacher clearly communicates Students demonstrate communicate academically appropriate student behavioral expectations academically appropriate student behavioral expectations academically appropriate student behavioral expectations exemplary behavioral expectations through their actions and require little redirection from the teacher Teacher does not reinforce and Teacher inconsistently Teacher reinforces and Students hold each other encourage appropriate/positive behavior as needed Teacher does not follow through on consequences Teacher does not address off- task or inappropriate behavior and it interferres with student learning Teacher does not account for student physical safety in the environment and transitions Teacher does not design or implement consistent classroom routines and procedures that run smoothly and does not foster student independence reinforces and encourage appropriate/positive behavior Teacher inconsistently follows through on consequences Teacher addresses off- task or inappropriate behavior inconsistently and/or ineffectively, so that it interferres with student learning some of the time Teacher accounts for student physical safety in the environment and transitions some of the time encourages appropriate/positive behavior as needed Teacher consistently follows through on consequences as needed Teacher addresses off- task or inappropriate behavior consistently and effectively, so that it does not interfere with student learning Teacher effectively designs a physically safe environment for activities and transitions Teacher designs and implements Teacher effectively designs and classroom routines and procedures that run smoothly some of the time and fosters some student independence for shared responsibilities implements consistent classroom routines and procedures that run smoothly and fosters student independence through shared responsibilities accountable for appropriate behavior and encourage positive behavior Consequences are rarely required Off- task or inappropriate behavior rarely occurs, so there is no interference with student learning Teacher effectively designs a physically safe environment for activities and transitions and students assume responsibility for the routines with little or no direction Teacher effectively designs and implements consistent classroom routines and procedures where students assume responsibility and carry them out in an efficient manner with little or no direction from the teacher

Classroom Climate Students do not actively listen Students listen occasionally and Students actively listen and Students actively listen and or respond positively to one another respond to one another intermittently respond positively to one another respond positively and respectfully to one another Students do not actively listen Students listen occasionally and Students actively listen and Students actively listen and or respond appropriately to the teacher respond appropriately to the teacher intermittently respond appropriately to the teacher respond positively and respectfully to the teacher Teacher does not have a Teacher has an inconsistent Teacher has a positive rapport Teacher has a positive rapport positive rapport with students and does not communicate or model expectations for respect of student differences rapport with students and communicates and models expectations for respect of some student differences with students and communicates and models expectations for respect of student differences with students and students demonstrate respect for student differences and encourage positive peer interactions Teacher does not ensure that all Teacher ensures that some Teacher ensures that most Students take the initiative to students contribute and their opinions are valued students contribute and their opinions are valued students contribute and their opinions are valued contribute their opinions and value the contributions of their peers Teacher does not celebrate student accomplishments Class arrangement is not conducive to learning and does not change as needed for lessons Teacher does not provide opportunities for students to take risks and challenge themselves or the environment is not emotionally supportive Teacher celebrates some student accomplishments Class arrangement is conducive to learning but does not change as needed for lessons Teacher provides a few opportunities for students to take risks and challenge themselves in an emotionally supportive environment Teacher celebrates student accomplishments Class arrangement is conducive to learning and changes as needed for lessons Teacher provides opportunities for students to take risks and challenge themselves in an emotionally supportive environment Students celebrate one another's accomplishments Class arrangement is flexible to allow for individual student learning needs and preferences Students openly take risks and challenge themselves during class

Teacher does not participate in professional development opportunities to enrich instructional practice PPfT Teacher Appraisal Professional Growth and Responsibilities Teacher participates in professional Teacher seeks professional development opportunities when development opportunities to enrich they are required or provided by the instructional practice district Teacher seeks on- going professional development opportunities to enrich instructional practice Teacher is not knowledgeable of current research based practices Teacher seeks out current research- based practices to improve practice but only implements a few of them Teacher actively seeks out current research- based practices to improve practice and uses them appropriately Teacher actively uses current research- based practices and evaluates impact on student learning Professional Development and Reflection Teacher does not set professional goals to enhance strengths and weaknesses Teacher avoids contributing to activities promoting professional reflection Teacher sets professional goals to enhance strengths and weaknesses but the goals are poorly formulated and do not improve practice Teacher sets professional goals to enhance strengths and weaknesses and maintains a plan for continuous improvement Teacher participates in activities Teacher regularly participates in related to professional reflection when invited activities related to professional reflection Teacher sets professional goals to enhance strengths and weaknesses and collaborates with others to develop a plan for continuous improvement Teacher takes a leadership role in promoting activities related to professional reflection Teacher does not use professional learning to impact student achievement Teacher uses professional learning with little impact on student achievement Teacher uses professional learning to improve student achievement Teacher leads professional learning that impacts student achievement or mentors others to effectively implement professional learning to improve student achievement Teacher does not possess required/current content knowledge Teacher possesses some of the required/current content knowledge Teacher possesses required/current content knowledge Teacher possesses required/current content knowledge and shares practices with colleagues Sources of Evidence: PD certificates, HCP records, minutes/agendas, student work products, surveys Draft

PPfT Teacher Appraisal Professional Growth and Responsibilities Teacher does not collaborate with Teacher collaborates with some Teacher collaborates with Teacher initiates or leads colleagues or share ideas and lessons colleagues and shares a limited colleagues and shares ideas and collaboration and the sharing of to improve practice number of ideas and lessons to improve practice lessons to improve practice ideas and lessons to improve practice Teacher does not accept feedback from supervisors and colleagues in order to improve Teacher accepts some feedback from supervisors and colleagues in order to improve Teacher accepts feedback from supervisors and colleagues in order to improve Teacher seeks feedback from supervisors and colleagues in order to improve Collaboration and Contributions Teacher does not actively participate in team/department meetings or school committees Teacher participates in some team/department meetings or school committees Teacher actively participates in team/department meetings or school committees Teacher assumes leadership roles in team/department meetings or school committees Teacher does not contribute ideas to improve the school Teacher does not collaborate with colleagues and administration to support struggling students Teacher occasionally suggests an idea aimed at improving the school Teacher collaborates with some colleagues and administration to support some struggling students Teacher contributes ideas, expertise, and time to accomplish school goals Teacher collaborates with colleagues and administration to support struggling students Teacher frequently contributes valuable ideas and expertise and instills in others a desire to accomplish school goals Teacher initiates or leads collaboration with colleagues and administration to support all students Sources of Evidence: copies of emails, student work products, interactions with colleagues outside the classroom, PD artifacts, meeting minutes/agendas, ECST Draft

PPfT Teacher Appraisal Professional Growth and Responsibilities Teacher does not use a variety of Teacher uses limited assessment Teacher uses a variety of Teacher embeds a wide array of assessment types to determine student strengths and weaknesses types to determine student strengths and weaknesses assessment types to determine student strengths and weaknesses on- going assessments in lessons to determine student strengths and weaknesses and to develop objectives and lesson plans Teacher does not prepare lesson plans when absent Teacher prepares minimal lesson plans when absent Teacher prepares lesson plans when absent Teacher prepares effective, objective driven lesson plans when absent Lesson plans are not well- organized and do not provide time for students to master objectives and standards Lesson plans are somewhat organized and provides very little time for students to master objectives and standards Lesson plans are well- organized and provides time for students to master objectives and standards Lesson plans are well- organized and provides time for students to master objectives and standards through continual engagement and self- assessment and reflection Teacher does not sequence lessons to ensure student mastery of standards and objectives Teacher sequences lessons to ensure student mastery of most standards and objectives Teacher sequences lessons to Teacher sequences lessons to ensure student mastery of standards help students synthesize and apply and objectives knowledge extending mastery of standards and objectives Lesson Planning and Data Use Teacher does not select, create, Teacher selects, creates, or or adapt materials and resources to adapts some materials and enrich learning resources to encourage learning Teacher selects, creates, or adapts materials and resources to enrich learning Teacher selects, creates, or adapts materials and resources to extend student understanding Teacher does not track student progress toward meeting objectives Teacher tracks some students' progress toward meeting objectives Teacher tracks student progress toward meeting objectives Students track their own progress toward meeting objectives and goals Teacher does not reflect on practice to improve Teacher does not analyze student data to adjust lesson plans and objectives Teacher does not use assessments to measure student mastery of standards and objectives and does not provide multiple ways students can demonstrate mastery Teacher demonstrates limited reflection on the effectiveness of lessons and rarely uses insights to improve practice Teacher regularly reflects on effectiveness of lessons and uses insights to improve practice and student learning Teacher regularly reflects on effectiveness of lessons and uses insights to improve practice and student learning and models this practice for others Teacher analyzes some students' Teacher analyzes student data to Teacher analyzes student data to data to adjust lesson plans and objectives adjust lesson plans and objectives individualize lesson plans and objectives Teacher uses assessments inconsistently to measure student mastery of standards and objectives and provides one or two ways students can demonstrate mastery Teacher routinely uses assessments to measure student mastery of standards and objectives and provides multiple ways students can demonstrate mastery Teacher routinely uses assessments to measure student mastery of standards and objectives that are interwoven into each lesson and provides multiple ways students can demonstrate mastery Sources of Evidence: Lesson Plans, resources Draft

PPfT Teacher Appraisal Professional Growth and Responsibilities Relational Communication Teacher maintains some positive Teacher maintains positive and and productive relationships with productive relationships with colleagues, students, and parents colleagues, students, and parents Teacher does not maintain a positive and productive relationship with colleagues, students, and parents Teacher does not communicate with parents/guardians regarding performance, behavior, and school activities Teacher communicates infrequently with parents/guardians regarding performance, behavior, and school activities Teacher regularly communicates with parents/guardians regarding performance, behavior, and school activities Teacher does not create a Teacher creates a somewhat Teacher creates a welcoming welcoming environment for parents welcoming environment for parents environment for parents and and community and community community Teacher does not communicate in an appropriate manner Teacher communicates in an appropriate manner inconsistently Teacher communicates in an appropriate manner Teacher maintains positive and productive relationships with colleagues, students, and parents that promotes respect and professionalism Teacher regularly communicates in a collaborative manner with parents/guardians regarding performance, behavior, and school activities Teacher creates a welcoming environment for parents and community and provides opportunities for them to participate in the school community Teacher communicates in an appropriate manner that promotes a positive climate and culture Sources of Evidence: communication log, copies of communication with parents, website Draft

Teacher does not follow district and school policies PPfT Teacher Appraisal Professional Growth and Responsibilities Teacher follows some district and Teacher follows district and school school policies policies Teacher follows district and school policies and serves on committees to create district and/or school policies Compliance Teacher does not comply with state and federal laws Teacher does not grade and post scores in a timely manner Teacher complies with some state and federal laws Teacher grades and posts scores but not in a timely manner Teacher complies with state and federal laws Teacher grades and posts scores in a timely manner Teacher complies with state and federal laws and invests efforts to help them be successful for students Teacher grades and posts scores in a timely manner and proactively communicates academic progress to students and parents Sources of Evidence: discipline file, observations, interactions with teachers outside the classroom, gradebook Draft

PPfT Appraisal Scoring Draft Component Score (1-4) Pie Chart Percentage Weighted Score Instructional Practice X 50 Professional Growth and Responsibilities X 25 Student Learning Objective X15 Schoolwide Value- Added X10 Total Score Ineffective Minimally Effective Effective Highly Effective Distinguished 85 200 257 314 370 400

PPfT Appraisal Scoring Rules Draft Instructional Practice Example Score All 3 scores averaged for one instructional Fall Announced Observation Score averaged to 1-4 practice score 1-4 2.68 Spring Announced Observation Score averaged to 1-4 Walkthroughs (4) Highest Score on each strand averaged to 1-4 3.15 3.49 3.11 Professional Growth and Responsibilities Example Score All strands averaged for one score 1-4 3.69 3.69 Student Growth Example Score Percentage of students who Percentage divided by 25 Student Learning Objective met the growth target 68% 2.72 Schoolwide Value- Added Based from value- added score received from SAS 4= Above Expectations 3= At Expectations 2 = 1 SD Below Expectations 1= 2 SD Below Expectations Example Score 3 3