\^yc\d^ CUCKOOPEN BARN, BIRDLIP AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION CONTENTS. Page SUMMARY 1 1. INTRODUCTION 2 2. CLIMATE 2 3. RELIEF AND LANDCOVER 2

Similar documents
Observatory monitoring framework indicator data sheet

Farming. In the Standard Grade Geography exam there are three types of farming you need to know about arable, livestock and mixed.

Chapter D9. Irrigation scheduling

APPENDIX B CHARACTERIZATION OF SOILS AT TEST SITES

NJ Interception Drainage

Ponds- Planning, Design, Construction

A SOIL TESTING SERVICE FOR FARMERS IN THAILAND, USING MOBILE LABORATORIES

SUSTAINABLE URBAN DRAINAGE SYSTEMS

LAND AT MANOR HOUSE FARM WIGHILL, TADCASTER TO LET. on a Farm Business Tenancy for a term of up to 5 years *********

What is Soil Survey?

Environmental Stewardship. Producing a Soil Management Plan for Environmental Stewardship

IAC 7/2/08 Utilities[199] Ch 9, p.1 CHAPTER 9 RESTORATION OF AGRICULTURAL LANDS DURING AND AFTER PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION

Report on Engineering Geological Investigation: Test pit logs in KwaMhlanga for RDP houses development.

The Economic Value of Improving Pasture Production on Saltland in Southern Australia

9.00 THE USE OF HUNTER LAND DRAINAGE PERFORATED PIPES. Hunter Underground Systems

FLOOD RISK AND SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE ASSESSMENT HILLHOUSE RESTORATION SITE, OFF JAMESON ROAD, THORNTON CLEVELEYS ON BEHALF OF NPL ESTATES

Appendix D.1. Testing Requirements for Infiltration, Bioretention and Sand Filter Subsoils

Total Income from Farming in the United Kingdom. First estimate for 2015

OSU Extension FACT SHEET

SOIL MECHANICS Assignment #4: Soil Permeability.

Status and National Priorities of Soil Resources in Sri Lanka

How To Prepare A Geotechnical Study For A Trunk Sewer Project In Lincoln, Nebraska

SHANGHAI: TRENDS TOWARDS SPECIALISED AND CAPITAL-INTENSIVE URBAN AGRICULTURE

Chapter B7. Managing saline soils

SECTION 7 LANDSCAPE RESTORATION

Land Disturbance, Erosion Control and Stormwater Management Checklist. Walworth County Land Conservation Department

SOILS AND AGRICULTURAL POTENTIAL FOR THE PROPOSED P166 ROAD, NEAR MBOMBELA, MPUMALANGA PROVINCE

The Potash Development Association Potash for Cereals

2015 AVAGO 2D SEISMIC SURVEY ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN SUMMARY

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU)

SOIL EROSION FROM MODELLING TO MITIGATION: CAN CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE BE A SOLUTION?

Pesticide Statistics in Estonia Eda Grüner

Guide to Cereals in the UK

Rural Flooding: The Potential Role of Forestry

Guide to Cereals. in the UK

Ukraine Crop Update. Spring Sowing Ahead of Average. CROP-UKR14-01 May 8, 2014

Travel Time. Computation of travel time and time of concentration. Factors affecting time of concentration. Surface roughness

Basic Hydrology. Time of Concentration Methodology

6. Base your answer to the following question on the graph below, which shows the average monthly temperature of two cities A and B.

Flash Flood Science. Chapter 2. What Is in This Chapter? Flash Flood Processes

Appendix C. Re-vegetation and Rehabilitation Sub-Plan

Appendix D Hydric Soils

GREENFIELD LODGE FARM, STRIXTON, NORTHAMPTONSHIRE

Water Usage in Agriculture and Horticulture Results from the Farm Business Survey 2009/10 and the Irrigation Survey 2010

WONDERFUL, WATERFUL WETLANDS

Agricultural Industry in Schleswig-Holstein Facts and Figures

Crop production million ha million tonnes PART 1. CHART 7: Harvested area of the most important crops in Central Asia (2010)

Index. protection. excavated drop inlet protection (Temporary) Block and gravel inlet Protection (Temporary)

Soil Sampling for Nutrient Management

FLOOD DAMAGE LOSSES TO AGRICULTURAL CROPS IN COLORADO. Norman L. Dalsted, John Deering, Rebecca Hill, and Martha Sullins 1

PUTTING FORAGES TOGETHER FOR YEAR ROUND GRAZING

LEARNING PAPER. Watershed Development and Integration in Southern Malawi. Christopher Michael Reichert, Consultant PURPOSE. Author or date here

HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT GUIDANCE NOTES ON SOIL TEST FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN

USING HUMIC COMPOUNDS TO IMPROVE EFFICIENCY OF FERTILISER NITROGEN

What to do if your property is flooded with sewage

SECTION EARTH MOVING

Classification of the soil at CIMMYT s experimental station in the Yaqui Valley near Ciudad Obregón, Sonora, Mexico

World Water and Climate Atlas

Name: PLSOIL 105 & 106 First Hour Exam February 27, Part A. Place answers on bubble sheet. 2 pts. each.

Policy Support for Agroforestry in the European Union

Outlet stabilization structure

Land Use/Land Cover Map of the Central Facility of ARM in the Southern Great Plains Site Using DOE s Multi-Spectral Thermal Imager Satellite Images

CIVL451. Soil Exploration and Characterization

THE APPRAISAL OF REAL ESTATE 3 RD CANADIAN EDITION BUSI 330

A GUIDE TO THE FARMLAND MAPPING AND MONITORING PROGRAM

NATURAL RESOURCES & NATURAL FEATURES

Phenology. Phenology and Growth of Grapevines. Vine Performance

Agricultural Production and Research in Heilongjiang Province, China. Jiang Enchen. Professor, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Northeast

Basic Soil Erosion and Types

Application of GIS: A Case Study of the Cimanuk Watershed, West Java, Indonesia

Name of region Wals-Siezenheim, Walser Gemüseland (Walser Vegetable Land), Salzburg, Austria

Appendix: National Value Added Look Up (valu) Table Database for gsurrgo Soil Data

MONITORING OF DROUGHT ON THE CHMI WEBSITE

CW 3110 SUB-GRADE, SUB-BASE AND BASE COURSE CONSTRUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

Institute for Land and

CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY FACING WITH IN RELATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE

AGRICULTURAL PROBLEMS OF JAPAN

THE ECOSYSTEM - Biomes

WEATHERING, EROSION, AND DEPOSITION PRACTICE TEST. Which graph best shows the relative stream velocities across the stream from A to B?

16. Storm water drainage

Updated Guidance for Farmers on Requirements for the Storage and Spreading of Poultry Litter to 31 December 2014

EXPLAINING GROUNDWATER AND WATER WELLS

WALLOON AGRICULTURE IN FIGURES

THE GREAT RUAHA RIVER PROFILE

Plants, like all other living organisms have basic needs: a source of nutrition (food),

TECHNICAL APPENDIX Investment in Water Resource Management

Wildfire Damage Assessment for the 2011 Southeast Complex Fires

Retention/Irrigation. Design Considerations. Soil for Infiltration Area Required Slope Environmental Side-effects

OBJECT BASED IMAGE CLASSIFICATION AND WEB-MAPPING TECHNIQUES FOR FLOOD DAMAGE ASSESSMENT

CHAPTER 5 OPEN CHANNEL HYDROLOGY

An Economic Analysis of Rural Land Use Policies in Ontario

Rain Gardens: Designing your Landscape to Protect Aquatic Resources. Curtis Hinman WSU Extension Faculty Watershed Ecologist

Real-time modelling of surface water flooding hazard and impact at countrywide scales

GUIDELINES FOR SOIL FILTER MEDIA IN BIORETENTION SYSTEMS (Version 2.01) March 2008

The effect of soil erosion on ecosystem services

Farming at dairy farms (produktion på mælkelandbrug)

How To Map A Lake In The North Of The Holland (Fiji)

Permeable Pavers. calstone.com. Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavements (PICP s)

What Is Rehabilitation?

Liquid Biofuels for Transport

Transcription:

\^yc\d^ UKOOPEN BARN, BIRDLIP AGRIULTURAL LAND LASSIFIATION ONTENTS Page SUMMAR 1 1. INTRODUTION 2 2. LIMATE 2 3. RELIEF AND LANDOVER 2 4. GEOLOG AND SOILS 2 5. AGRIULTURAL LAND LASSIFIATION 3 APPENDIX 1 References 4 APPENDIX 2 Description of the grades and subgrades 5 APPENDIX 3 Definition of Soil Wetness lasses 7 MAP

UKOOPEN BARN, BIRDLIP, GLOUESTER AGRIULTURAL LAND UVSSIFIATION SURVE SUMMAR The survey was carried out by ADAS on behalf of MAFF as part of its statutory role in response to an ad-hoc application to carry out landfill on the site. The fieldwork at uckoopen Barn, Birdlip, Gloucester was completed In December 1994 at a scale of 1:10,000. Data on climate, soils and geology was used and is presented In the report. The distribution of grades is shown on the accompanying AL map and summarised below. Information Is correct at this scale but could be misleading if enlarged. Distribution of AL grades: uckoopen Barn, Birdlip % of % of Grade Area (ha) Survey Agricultural Area Land 3b 2.3 100 100 TOTAL The entire site was graded as 3b. The centre ofthe site consists of heavy soils with a wetness limitation. The rest of the site is well drained with a high stone content, being downgraded to 3b due to topsoil stoniness.

1. INTRODUTION.An Agricultural Land lassification (AL) Survey was carried out In December 1994 at uckoopen Bam, Birdlip, Gloucester on behalf of MAFF as part of Its statutory role in response to an ad-hoc planning application for a landfill site. The fieldwork covering 2.3 ha of land was conducted by ADAS at a scale of 1:10,000 with approximately one boring per hectare of agricultural land. A total of 3 auger borings were examined and one soil profile pit used to assess subsoil conditions. The published provisional one inch to the mile AL map of this area (MAFF 1962) shows the grades ofthe site at a reconnaissance scale to be non-agricultural. The recent survey supersedes this map having been carried out at a more detailed level and using the Revised Guidelines and riteria for grading the quality of agricultural land (MAFF 1988). These guidelines provide a framework for classifying land according to the extent to Which its physical or chemical characteristics impose long-term limitations on agricultural use. The grading takes account ofthe top 120 cm ofthe soil profile. A description ofthe grades used in the AL system can be found in Appendix 2. 2. LIMATE The grade ofthe land Is determined by the most limiting factor present. The overall climate is considered first because it can have an oveniding infiuence on restricting land to a lower grade despite other favourable conditions. Estimates of climatic variables were interpolated from the published agricultural climate dataset (Meteorological Office 1989). The parameters used for assessing overall climate are accumulated temperature, a measure ofthe relative warmth of a locality, and average annual rainfall, a measure of overall wetness. The results shown in Table 1 indicate there is an overall climatic limitation which restricts the land to Subgrade 3a. Table 1: limatic Interpolations: uckoopen Barn, Birdlip Grid Reference SO 943158 Altitude (m) 277 Accumulated Temperature (day ) 1206 Average Annual Rainfall (mm) 881 Overall limatic Grade 3a Field apacity Days 191 Moisture deficit (mm): Wheat 68 Potatoes 48 limatic data on Field apacity Days (FD) and Moisture Deficits for wheat and potatoes are also shown. These data are used in assessing the soil wetness and droughtiness limitations referred to in later sections. 3. REUEF AND LANDOVER The site has a shallow depression mnning east-west and overall slopes gently to the west. Gradients are gentle and are not limiting. 4. GEOLOG AND SOILS The geology ofthe site Is shown on the published 1:50.000 scale solid and drift geology map, sheet 234, British Geological Survey 1975. The site is undertain by upper inferior oolite to the east and lower inferior oolite to the west.

The soils were mapped by the Soil Survey of England and Wales in 1983 at a reconnaissance scaleof 1:250,000. The site Is mapped as having soils ofthe Sherborne Association which are described as shallow, well drained brashy calcareous clayey soils over limestone, associated with slowly permeable calcareous clayey soils. The soils found during the recent survey were consistent with this description. 5. AGRIULTURAL LAND LASSIFIATION The distribution of AL grades is shown in Table 2 and on the accompanying AL map. This Information could be misleading if shown at a larger scale. Table 2: Distribution of AL grades: uckoopen Bam, Birdlip % of % of Grade Area (ha) Survey Agricultural Area Land 3b 2.3 100 100 TOTAL The entire site was graded as Subgrade 3b. The north and south ofthe site consisted of well drained stony soils with 25% stones in the topsoil and 60% stones below 18 cm. The combination of this high stone content, the clayey matrix texture and the climatic conditions led to a droughtiness grade of 3a. However, the content of stones exceeding 2 cm diameter in the top 25 cm led to a final grade of 3b. The depression running across the middle ofthe site from east to west consisted of clayey soils with gleying and a slowly permeable layer (SPL) occurring below 40 cm. This, in conjunction with the high Field apacity Day value (191 FD) leads to a Wetness lass III (see Appendix 3) and a final AL grade of 3b. Resource Planning Team Taunton Statutory Unit 13 January 1995

APPENDIX 1 REFERENES BRITISH GEOLOGIAL SURVE (1975) Solid and Drift Edition, Sheet 234, 1:50,000 scale. MAFF (1962) Agricultural Land lassification Map, Sheet 144, Provisional 1:63,360 scale. MAFF (1988) Agricultural Land lassification of England and Wales (Revised Guidelines and riteria for grading the quality of agricultural land), Alnwick. METEOROLOGIAL OFFIE (1989) limatological Data for Agricultural Land lassification. SOIL SURVE OF ENGLAND AND WALES (1983) Sheet 5, Soils of South West England, 1:250,000 scale.

APPENDIX 2 DESRIPTION OF GRADES AND SUBGRADES Grade 1 excellent quality agricultural land Land with no or very minor limitations to agricultural use. A very wide range of agricultural and horticultural crops can be grown and commonly include top fruit, soft fruit, salad crops and winter harvested vegetables. ields are high and less variable than on land of lower quality. Grade 2 - very good quality agricultural land Land with minor limitations which affect crop yield, cultivations or harvestmg. A wide range of agricultural and horticultural crops can usually be grown but on some land in the grade there may be reduced flexibility due to difficulties with the production of the more demanding crops such as winter harvested vegetables and arable root crops. The level of yield is generally high but may be lower or more variable than Grade 1. Grade 3 - good to moderate quality agricultural land Land with moderate limitations which affect the choice of crops, timing and type of cultivation, harvesting or the level of yield. Where more demanding crops are grown yields are generally lower or more variable than on land in Grades 1 and 2. Subgrade 3a - good quality agricultural land Land capable of consistently producing moderate to high yields of a narrow range of arable crops, especially cereals, or moderate yields of a wide range of crops including cereals, grass, oilseed rape, potatoes, sugar beet and the less demanding horticultural crops. Subgrade 3b - moderate quality agricultural land Land capable of producing moderate yields of a narrow range of crops, principally cereals and grass, or lower yields of a wider range of crops or high yields of grass which can be grazed or harvested over most of the year. Grade 4 - poor quality agricultural land Land with severe limitations which significantly restrict the range of crops and/or level of yields. It is mainly suited to grass with occasional arable crops (eg cereals and forage crops) the yields of which are variable. In most climates, yields of grass may be moderate to high but there may be difficulties in utilisation. The grade also includes very droughty arable land. Grade 5 - very poor quality agricultural land Land with very severe limitations which restrict use to permanent pasture or rough grazing, except for occasional pioneer forage crops. Descriptions of other land categories used on AL maps Urban Built-up or 'hard' uses with relatively littie potential for a return to agriculture including: housing, industry, commerce, education, transport, religious buildings, cemeteries. Also, hard-surfaced sports facilities, permanent caravan sites and vacant land; all types of derelict land, including mineral workings which are only likely to be reclaimed using derelict land grants.

Non-agricultural 'Soft' uses where most of the land could be retumed relatively easily to agriculture, including: private park land, public open spaces, sports fields, allotments and soft-surfaced areas on airports/airfields. Also active mineral workings anti refuse tips where restoration conditions to 'soft' after-uses may apply. Agricultural buildings Includes the normal range of agricultural buildings as well as other relatively permanent structures such as glasshouses. Temporary stmctures (eg polythene tunnels erected for lambing) may be ignored. Open water Includes lakes, ponds and rivers as map scale permits. Land not surveyed Agricultural land which has not been surveyed. Where the land use includes more than one ofthe above landcover types, eg buildings in large grounds, and where may be shown separately. Otherwise, the most extensive cover type will usually be shown. Source: MAFF (1988) Agricultural Land lassification of England and Wales (Revised Guidelines and riteria for Grading the Quality of Agricultural Land), Alnwick.

APPENDIX 3 DEFINITION OF SOIL WETNESS LASSES Viletness lass I The soil profile is not wet within 70 cm depth for more than 30 days in most years. Wetness lass II The soil profile is wet within 70 cm depth for 31-90 days in most years or, if there is no slowly permeable layer within 80 cm depth, it is wet within 70 cm for more than 90 days, but not wet within 40 cm depth for more than 30 days in most years. Wetness lassml The soil profile is wet within 70 cm depth for 91-180 days in most years or, if there is no slowly penneable layer within 80 cm depth, it is wet within 70 cm for more than 180 days, but only wet within 40 cm depth for between 31 and 90 days in most years. Wetness lass IV The soil profile is wet within 70 cm depth for more than 180 days but not within 40 cm depth for more than 210 days in most years or, if there is no slowly permeable layer within 80 cm depth, it is wet within 40 cm depth for 91-210 days in most years. Wetness lass V The soil profile is wet within 40 cm depth for 211-335 days in most years. Wetness lass VI The soil proflle is wet within 40 cm depth for more than 335 days in most years. Notes: The number of days specified is not necessarily a continuous period. 'In most years' is defined as more than 10 out of 20 years. Source: Hodgson, J M (in preparation), Soil Survey Field Handbook (revised edition).

SITE NAME uckoopen Barn PROFILE NO. IP SLOPE AND ASPET 1" LAND USE Arable Av Rainfall: ATO: 881 mm 1206 day PARENT MATERIAL Oolite JOB NO. DATE GRID REFERENE DESRIBED B FDays: 191 SOIL SAMPLE REFERENES 137/94 Horizon No. Lowesi Av. Depth (cm) Texiure 21/12/94 Matrix (Ped Face) olours SO 914157 Stoniness: SizeTjpe, and Field Melhod Mollling Abundance, onlrasl, Size and olour PR Woode Mangan ones Slruclure: Ped Developmenl Size and Shape limatic Grade: Exposure Grade: 1 onsislence 3a Slruclural ondiiion Pores (Fissures) PRW/132 Roots: Abundance and Size alcium arbonate onteni Horizon Boundary: Distinciness and form 1 18 MZL 75R4/4 8% >2cm 17% <2cm 25% HR sieved - Friable Moderaie Many Many Fine es Abrupt Smoolh 2 40 75R4/6 45% >2cm 14% <2cm 60% HR sieved ontrolled by stone conieni Friable Modcrale Many ommon Fine es lear Smoolh 3 60+ S 10R6/4 70% HR Visual estimate It Friable Moderaie Many Few Fine es - Profile Glcycd From: Not gleyed Available Water Wheal: 70 mm Final AL Grade: 3b Depth to Slowly Permeable Horizon: No SPL Polatoes: 57 mm Moisture Deficil Wheal: 68 mm Main Limiting Faclor(s): Stoniness Wetness lass: 1 Potaloes: 48 mm Weiness Grade: 2 Moisture Balance Wheat: 2 mm Polaloes: 9 mm Droughliness Grade: 3a (alculated lo 120 cm) Remarks: 8% stones >2cm in lop 18 cm 45% stones >2cm in 18-25 cm Weighted average = 18% stones >2cm in lop 25 cm (3b)

SOIL PLASTIIT REORDING SHEET ANNEX 2 SITE DATA Grid Ref SO 914157 Site Name UKOOPEN BARN LPA AAR 881 ATO 1206 FD 191 MD (wheat) 68 MD (potatoes) 48 SOIL PIT DATA PIT ONE PIT TWO PIT THREE SOIL SERIES Sherborne SOIL SERIES SOIL SERIES DEPTH TEXTURE PLASTI /N OMMENTS TEXTURE PLASTI /N OMMENTS TEXTURE PLASTI /N OMMENTS 10 cm MZL 20 cm 30 cm 40 cm SOcm 60 cm