Syllabus. Course: Strategies for Teaching English Language Learners Presenter: David Noyes. Course Overview

Similar documents
Syllabus. Required ebook: Pyramid Response to Intervention: RTI, Professional Learning Communities, and How to Respond When Kids Don t Learn

Syllabus. Dr. Calderón connects instructional practice with the Common Core State Standards, and backs up her recommendations with research:

Syllabus. Course: Becoming a Reflective Teacher Presenter: Dr. Robert J. Marzano Credits: 3

OSU CASCADES. Master of Arts in Teaching Program ESOL Endorsement and/or Middle and High School Education Program Winter 2014

Program Overview. This guide discusses Language Central for Math s program components, instructional design, and lesson features.

CHARACTERISTICS FOR STUDENTS WITH: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY (LEP)

NEA Academy InTASC Classes

FLORIDA TEACHER STANDARDS for ESOL ENDORSEMENT 2010

Standard Two: Knowledge of Mathematics: The teacher shall be knowledgeable about mathematics and mathematics instruction.

Pre-Requisites EDAM-5001 Early Literacy Guiding Principles and Language

G R A D E S K - I N S T R U C T I O N A N D A S S E S S M E N T

Supporting English Language Learners Through Technology

THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY. Add on Certification Program English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) Endorsement

ELL Considerations for Common Core-Aligned Tasks in English Language Arts

Q Comp Requirements and Guiding Principles

Learning Today Smart Tutor Supports English Language Learners

Help! My Student Doesn t Speak English. 10 Tips To Help Your English Language Learners Succeed Today

Strategies to use When Working with ELL Students

Reading Street and English Language Learners

Program Models. proficiency and content skills. After school tutoring and summer school available

Poetry Kids Online Learning Environment

Sample Completed Summative Report Form for a Secondary Teacher 1*

California University Intermediate Unit 1 ESL Professional Development Project

Bilingual Education: English Language Learners Secondary Reading/LA Instruction

Key Principles for ELL Instruction (v6)

assessment report ... Academic & Social English for ELL Students: Assessing Both with the Stanford English Language Proficiency Test

Master of Science in Education Major in Early Childhood Literacy Online Graduate Education for Today s Teacher

Language, Learning, and Content Instruction

READING WITH. Reading with Pennsylvania Reading Specialist Certificate

CALIFORNIA S TEACHING PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS (TPE)

French Language and Culture. Curriculum Framework

ACRONYMS & TERMS RELATED TO ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

Position Statement on English Language Arts Education Connecticut State Board of Education December 3, 2008

A Principal s Guide to Intensive Reading Interventions for Struggling Readers in Reading First Schools

Pre-service Performance Assessment Professional Standards for Teachers: See 603 CMR 7.08

INTENSIVE READING INTERVENTIONS FOR STRUGGLING READERS IN EARLY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. A Principal s Guide

EDTC Program Assessment Framework

What Does Research Tell Us About Teaching Reading to English Language Learners?

YOUNG FIVES PROGRAM THREE-YEAR SINGLE PLAN FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Palo Alto Unified School District

Requirements EDAM WORD STUDY K-3: PRINT AWARENESS, LETTER KNOWLEDGE, PHONICS, AND HIGH FREQUENCY WORDS

Silicon Valley Mathematics Initiative Student Focused Math Content Coaching

TESOL Standards for P-12 ESOL Teacher Education = Unacceptable 2 = Acceptable 3 = Target

How To Learn To Teach With A Language Skill

ESOL Endorsement Program

GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES: TESOL MA COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION California State University, Los Angeles (Updated October 2010)

Reading Competencies

READING SPECIALIST STANDARDS

COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY IN TEACHING READING

TELPAS. Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System. grades K 12 Revised July texas Education agency student assessment division

An Overview of Applied Linguistics

LITERACY: READING LANGUAGE ARTS

COURSE TITLE: CHILD CARE & DEVELOPMENT LENGTH: ONE SEMESTER GRADES DEPARTMENT: FINE, PRACTICAL, AND PERFORMING ARTS SCHOOL:

Standards of Quality and Effectiveness for Professional Teacher Preparation Programs APPENDIX A

NW COLORADO BOCES ALTERNATIVE LICENSURE PROGRAM

TExES English as a Second Language Supplemental (154) Test at a Glance

Academic Standards for Reading, Writing, Speaking, and Listening June 1, 2009 FINAL Elementary Standards Grades 3-8

School and classroom structures for comprehensive ELD instruction

21st Century Community Learning Center

I. School- Wide DL Components

Unit/Lesson Planning Guide: Key Questions to Consider While Planning

Muhammad Ali Presents Go the Distance! Aligns to Title I, Part A. June

There are 4,400 students enrolled in Salem Public Schools. Bentley Elementary, is currently a Level 4 school undergoing a turnaround redesign.

San Jose State University College of Education Department of Special Education. EDSE 102: Speech, Language, Typical and Atypical Development

Teacher Evaluation. Missouri s Educator Evaluation System

The University of North Carolina at Pembroke Academic Catalog

Session Objectives. What are the goals of Title III, Part A? Analyzing AMAO Data to Improve Instruction for ELL Students

Local Government and Leaders Grade Three

Expeditionary Learning at King Middle School. June 18, 2009

Teaching Math to English Language Learners

Learning styles and writing in science

North Carolina TEACHER. evaluation process. Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction

IDAHO STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Indiana Wesleyan University Differentiated Lesson Plan Physical Education 2008 NASPE Standards

Helping English Language Learners (ELLs) overcome language barriers in the university classroom. Christine E Morgan Nancy Oczkowski

Effective Sheltered Instruction Strategies

Common Core Standards for Literacy in Science and Technical Subjects

Foundation Paper Supporting Special Education Students with READ 180

GEORGIA REGENTS UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF TEACHER EDUCATION

Nutrition and Culinary Arts I. Example SLO

STANDARDS FOR ENGLISH-AS-A-SECOND LANGUAGE TEACHERS

ESL Programs and Instruction in the Schenectady City School District

Disrupting Class How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns

COMMUNICATION COMMUNITIES CULTURES COMPARISONS CONNECTIONS. STANDARDS FOR FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNING Preparing for the 21st Century

Preservice to Practice: Preparing all (Florida) Teachers for English Language Learners in Elementary Classrooms

ELE 4775 Language and Language Arts in Early Childhood Summer 2006

Integrating the Common Core Standards into the Music Curriculum

Overview. Essential Questions. Grade 2 Mathematics, Quarter 4, Unit 4.4 Representing and Interpreting Data Using Picture and Bar Graphs

What Research Tells Us about Effective Instruction for English Language Learners

2. In pairs discuss the questions that follow. Excerpt from Valdés, Kibler, & Walqui: Recent Examples of Possible Roles for ESL Professionals

Marzano Center Non-Classroom Instructional Support Member Evaluation Form

Teaching All Students to Read: With Strong Intervention Outcomes

Alignment of the Hawaii Preschool Content Standards With HighScope s Preschool Child Observation Record (COR), 2nd edition

Planning Commentary Respond to the prompts below (no more than 9 single-spaced pages, including prompts).

Nevis Public School District #308. District Literacy Plan Minnesota Statute 120B.12, Learning together... Achieving quality together.

Reading Results with

Making Reading Content Comprehensible for Intermediate Language Learners. Colin Dalton. University of Houston-Downtown, United States

Course-Based Key Assessment #4 ESOL Teaching Portfolio and Reflective Summary of Field Experience Used in TESL 5040 Practicum in ESOL

Welcome To GATE Parent Information Night

Alignment of the National Standards for Learning Languages with the Common Core State Standards

Secondary Content Areas, Special Education, N-12. Teaching Reading in the Content Areas: Part I and Part II

Transcription:

Syllabus Course: Strategies for Teaching English Language Learners Presenter: David Noyes Course Overview In this highly informative and pragmatic course, David Noyes, a coach in English language development and sheltered instruction, introduces participants to concepts and strategies that will help them meet the unique needs of English language learners in today s classrooms. Participants study the stages of language acquisition and language development, styles of communication, the public and private voices of language, and their implications for classroom instruction. Noyes presents discourse patterns in academic and social language. In addition, he explores methods for engaging students in cooperative learning, using instructional strategies that appeal to multiple intelligences and applying language in formal and social context. Next, he tackles strategies in vocabulary building and leveraging prior and background knowledge to improve comprehension and create opportunities for interactive learning. Participants discover how to adapt difficult texts and assess for understanding. They learn how to apply these strategies and instructional practices in the classroom to help English language learners develop proficiency in all the domains of language development: listening, speaking, reading, and writing, all skills required for achieving academic success. Course Objectives After completing this course, educators will know: The stages of language acquisition and development The four domains of language Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills (BICS) and Cognitive Academic Language Proficiency (CALP) Public and private voice and their implications for instruction The role of cooperative learning for ELLs The role of contextualizing language in instruction Strategies for: o Building appropriate vocabulary

o o o o Leveraging prior and background knowledge Promoting interactive learning Adapting difficult texts Assessment After completing this course, educators will apply the following skills: Develop instruction consistent with patterns in language acquisition and development Teach the public and private voice Develop students academic and social language Employ cooperative group strategies in the classroom Enhance their instruction by contextualizing language Build students vocabulary Leverage prior and background knowledge Promote interactive learning Adapt difficult texts Assess students for understanding Units Unit 1: Stages of Language Acquisition To open the course, the presenter provides an overview of English language learners in the United States while carefully considering cultural differences, the components of language acquisition, and language behaviors demonstrated by English language learners. Participants are given opportunities to apply, analyze, and synthesize the information by participating in multiple activities that will demonstrate their learning. The four domains of language How language is acquired Sociolinguistic rules governing language use Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills (BICS) and Cognitive Academic Language Proficiency (CALP) :

Identify and plan for English language learners Evaluate literacy levels in English language learners Create classroom activities to inspire English language learners' participation Unit 2: Making Connections: Prior and Background Knowledge In this unit, David Noyes carefully identifies and differentiates between prior knowledge and background knowledge by looking at cultural and geographical differences as they relate to English language learners. Participants also explore strategies and activities that can be used in the classroom to activate prior knowledge and build background knowledge. The differences between prior knowledge and background knowledge in English language learners The role that prior knowledge plays in learning English The importance of building background knowledge for students learning English : Use schema theory to determine cultural, emotional, and geographic background of students Implement strategies and activities to assess students prior knowledge Use activities and strategies to activate prior knowledge and background knowledge Employ strategies and activities to build students background knowledge Unit 3: Cooperative Learning and English Language Learners In this unit, participants explore the key components and the rationale for cooperative learning as it relates to English language learners. Cooperative learning can help to accelerate language acquisition by allowing students to use language functionally. Participants learn the teaching standards associated with cooperative learning. The presenter introduces and discusses activities that promote cooperative learning in the classroom.

The differences between group and cooperative learning The key components of cooperative learning How cooperative learning benefits English learners Plan and employ cooperative learning activities in the classroom Detail the components of cooperative learning (APLE) Manage a classroom which employs strategies of cooperative learning Unit 4: Vocabulary and English Language Learners David Noyes gives participants an opportunity to review current research in vocabulary development for English language learners. Participants learn the four types of vocabulary instruction as well as how indirect and direct vocabulary learning differ. The research presented includes how vocabulary is learned, how it is chosen, and what strategies and activities can be utilized in the classroom. Current scientific research on vocabulary instruction How to assess and use students prior knowledge and background knowledge in vocabulary instruction How to determine which vocabulary words are important to teach Employ effective practices in vocabulary instruction Plan and implement a variety of specific activities for teaching vocabulary to language learners at all levels Use activities in the classroom to motivate students to enjoy vocabulary learning

Unit 5: Interactive Learning and Text Adaption for English Learner In unit five, Mr. Noyes presents to participants key strategies and resources for creating a more interactive learning environment for English language learners. In addition, participants review the current research on parts of the brain and discuss which are responsible for the different aspects of information retention. Participants learn instructional techniques that target the most efficient retention of language and content. Mr. Noyes identifies how modifying difficult text can allow English language learners to have equal access to the curriculum. He demonstrates specific classroom strategies for use of graphic depictions, alternative resources, and teaching practices that will enhance language learning students access to vocabulary and content. Rationales for interactive learning techniques The importance of using interactive learning techniques Current research on the parts of the brain as they relate to learning and retention of information Employ strategies, activities, and techniques to adapt text for new language learners Implement multiple interactive teaching strategies in classrooms with English language learners. Design multi-sensory instructional approaches for lessons Unit 6: Multiple Intelligences In this unit, David Noyes explores multiple intelligences through identification, differentiation, and application in the classroom. Participants learn the history of the concept of human intelligences as well as the unique characteristics of the eight intelligences as defined by Howard Gardner in his book, Frames of Mind. In addition, Noyes demonstrates activities that integrate multiple intelligences with the special needs of English language learners.

The history behind multiple intelligences The characteristics of the intelligences The importance of differentiating instruction and assessment to accommodate multiple intelligences Student Learning Objectives Identify and assess students multiple intelligences Implement strategies for teaching multiple intelligences in the classroom Apply suggested activities to specific intelligences in the classroom Unit 7: The Application of Formal Language and Social Context for English Language Learners In this unit, Noyes identifies and explores information about formal and informal language that is used by students both inside and outside of the classroom. Participants learn the five language discourse registers and how they are used. Noyes presents research that underlines the importance of new language learners accessing different language styles in order to succeed in the classroom. Careful consideration of how to "bridge the gap" between these language functions will help participants to strengthen instruction in the classroom. The differences between formal language and public voice When to use social language or private voice The different styles in which we communicate Implement teaching strategies which will bridge the gap between formal and social language Explicitly teach the language registers using a variety of activities and classroom strategies

Unit 8: English Language Development In this unit, David Noyes introduces the key components of an effective, explicit, and systematic English Language Development (ELD) program. He provides a rationale for participants to develop these types of programs in their districts, schools, and classrooms. In addition, Noyes also includes a description and explanation for why the English language is so difficult to teach and to learn, describing the elements of the language that are unique and difficult for students to grasp, such as contractions, grammatical structures, homophones, homographs, and unpredictable spelling rules. Mr. Noyes explains strategies for direct instruction as it applies to a variety of student language proficiencies. The importance of explicit, systematic, and consistent ELD instruction The key components of an ELD program Teach suggested vocabulary and concepts for beginning and early intermediate English language learners Create a "safe" classroom environment for new English speakers Implement oral language activity observation and oral interviews Unit 9: Assessment for English Language Learners In this final unit, Mr. Noyes provides an overview of assessment practices specific to English language learners as well as English speaking students. In addition, Mr. Noyes presents the variety of purposes for assessment: for placement of new language learners and for assessing their learning needs and styles. Participants learn methods of assessment for ELL in school districts, individual schools, and individual classrooms. They will learn to distinguish between formal and informal assessments and how each can inform teaching methods and practices. Mr. Noyes illustrates a variety of graphic organizers that teachers can use to help them progress in language acquisition as well as academic content and to periodically assess their progress. The presenter concludes with a focused discussion of strategies and activities to use in the classroom.

Why and how to assess English language learners How to distinguish between language proficiency and academic standards Implement strategies for differentiated assessment for ELL as well as English speaking students Employ active participation activities to use with English learners and English speakers that access all four elements of language; listening, speaking, reading, and writing Create and utilize graphic organizers to aid all students in understanding of language and content Presenter Bio David Noyes is a coach in English language development and sheltered instruction for the Long Beach Unified School District. The author ofastronomy Made Fun and Oceans Made Fun both English learner support resources Noyes is also a writer for McGraw Hill s Open Court English Learner Support Guide. He has an M.A. in early childhood education and curriculum; writes children s songs and poetry; and earned a 2005 Parents CD Choice award for Oceans Made Fun. Noyes has presented for California Elementary Education Association/Staff Development Resources and been awarded 2006 Outstanding Teacher of the Year by Long Beach Unified and the Los Angeles County Office of Education, for meeting the needs of English language learners. Methods of Instruction: Videos (presentations consisting of lecture/discussions, and classroom practice coaching) Reflection questions (open-ended questions at intervals throughout the video presentations where participants are asked to reflect on the course content, their own practice and/or experiences, and their intentions for their practice) Quizzes (selected-response quizzes to assess understanding of the video presentations)

All steps listed under each topic must be completed to receive credit for the course. No partial credit is given. Plagiarism Policy KDS recognizes plagiarism as a serious academic offense. Plagiarism is the dishonest passing off of someone else s work as one s own and includes failing to cite sources for others ideas, copying material from books or the Internet, and handing in work written by someone other than the participant. Plagiarism will result in a failing grade and may have additional consequences. For more information about plagiarism and guidelines for appropriate citation, consult plagiarism.org. KDS Rubric for Pass/Fail Option: CEU Passing Requirements: 70 points or more No unsatisfactory in either category Quizzes Reflection questions 40% of total grade 60% of total grade Component Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Distinguished

Quizzes (16 points) (24 points) (32 points) (40 points) Quizzes: Quizzes: Quizzes: Quizzes: 0-40% correct 60% correct 80% correct 100% correct Reflection questions (30 points) Reflection questions: (40 points) Reflection questions: (50 points) Reflection questions: (60 points) Reflection questions: -Participant includes no content from the course in his or her responses -Participant does not address the questions posed -Participant includes some content from the course, usually appropriate, in his or her responses -Participant answers the questions directly, not always fully -Participant includes appropriate content from the course in his or her responses -Participant makes thoughtful comments in direct response to the questions -Participant provides rich detail from the content of the course in his or her responses -Participant makes his or her responses to the questions personally meaningful