Certification of Animal Care and Use Programs



Similar documents
CCAC policy statement on: the certification of animal ethics and care programs

Canadian Council on Animal Care. policy statement for: senior administrators responsible for animal care and use programs

CCAC Animal Data Report

American Veterinary Medical Association (AMVA)

2015/2016. Heart and Stroke Foundation New Investigator Awards Guidelines Alberta. (Winter 2014 Competition)

Standard Monitoring Procedures

C A M P E P. Commission on Accreditation of Medical Physics Educational Programs, Inc. Guidelines for Accreditation

How To Win An Award For Outstanding Research At A University

IC Chapter 3. Veterinarians; Veterinary Technicians; Licenses, Special Permits, and Registration

Boston College s Satisfactory Academic Progress Policy for Federal Financial Aid Graduate Students. Updated July 1, 2015

DEPARTMENT OF PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOPHYSICS GRADUATE DEGREE POLICIES AND PROGRAM

DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY AND BIOCHEMISTRY UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, BOULDER, COLORADO Departmental Rules for Advanced Degrees 1 Revised : March, 2009

The Stature of Academic Success in California University

DRAFT Report on Office of the Superintendent of Financial Report on Institutions Office of the Superintendent of Financial

REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFICATION BODIES TO DETERMINE COMPLIANCE OF APPLICANT ORGANIZATIONS TO THE MAGEN TZEDEK SERVICE MARK STANDARD

Memorandum of Understanding between the NSW Ministry of Health and Sydney Water Corporation

Consolidated I&T Data Centre - P3 Canada Fund

INSTITUTIONAL ELIGIBILITY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT RISK ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE

Succession Plan. Planning Information and Plan Template December Succession Planning 2010

Major Science Initiatives Fund competition Draft Call for Proposals for consultation

June 2008 Report No An Audit Report on The Texas Education Agency s Oversight of Alternative Teacher Certification Programs

YRC Research Program - Three Headings of an applicant's Review

AND MS DEGREE REQUIREMENTS

Applications are invited for the above Contract Agent post at the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC).

Memorandum of Understanding ( MOU ) Respecting the Oversight of Certain Clearing and Settlement Systems. among:

BYLAWS of the Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences

Training Issues. Sara Maloney, IACUC Coordinator Boston Children s Hospital

This procedure should be read in conjunction with the Purchasing By-Law , as amended from time to time.

2016/2017 National New Investigator Award Submission Guidelines

Human Resources CAPABILITY POLICY & PROCEDURE. September 2012 Updated June of 18

NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE TITLE 8, CHAPTER 7 LICENSURE OF PERSONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH POSITIONS. Authority. N.J.S.A. 26:1A-38 et seq.

Apprenticeship frameworks funding and AGE performance-management rules

SIR FOUNDATION FUNDING SOURCE DEVELOPMENT GRANT GUIDELINES

ACCREDITATION CRITERIA

Guidelines for Funding Research Projects

Lung Health Dissertation Grant (LH) Program Description

Academic Standards and Policies For Advanced Education Programs in Dentistry. Guidelines for Academic Progress, Promotion and Graduation

GRADUATE PROGRAM IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

Marie-Claire Rickard, GCP & Governance Manager Rachel Fay, GCP & Governance Manager Elizabeth Clough, R&D Operations Manager

Regulatory Compliance Management (RCM) (formerly Legislative Compliance Management (LCM))

Preceptor Handbook. Veterinary Technology Distance Learning Program. San Juan College

Risk Management Policy

University Accreditation Program Policy

OLB certification process for Forestry Companies GP01

SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES (SPS)

Approval Review Process: Baccalaureate Nursing Programs in New Brunswick

CHESHIRE EAST COUNCIL. Cabinet

Quality Monitoring Checklist

Document Title: Trust Approval and Research Governance

Questions and answers on post approval change management protocols

august09 tpp Internal Audit and Risk Management Policy for the NSW Public Sector OFFICE OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Policy & Guidelines Paper

Timeline to Degree Molecular Biology Ph.D.

RTO Delegations Guidelines

THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY

Procedures for Induction and Procedures and Criteria for Probation 2015/2016

How To Get A Phd In Biology

University of King's College Research Ethics Policy

Respiratory Therapy. Associate in Science Degree. GENERAL EDUCATION ACADEMIC ADVISEMENT: Students must meet with a regular ELAC academic

Site visit inspection report on compliance with HTA minimum standards. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. HTA licensing number 12066

1. Purpose. 2. Membership and Organization. 3. Meetings. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce Risk Management Committee Mandate

Drexel University College of Medicine MOLECULAR & CELLULAR BIOLOGY & GENETICS GRADUATE PROGRAM POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

REGULATION (EEC) No 2309/93

Fritz Lang Foundation

CRD Wastewater Treatment Project: Observations and Recommendations on Project Governance

Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) Handbook

Master of Science in Technical Communication Policies & Procedures

In addition, you must:

Senior Laboratory Technician Analytical Facilities - (0.4 FTE) Ref: TC456

BUSINESS CONTINUITY PLANNING

Contractor Safety Management

Loma Linda University Children s Hospital. EMERGENCY MEDICINE SERVICE Rules and Regulations

COMMITTEE FOR VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS GUIDELINE FOR THE CONDUCT OF POST-MARKETING SURVEILLANCE STUDIES OF VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

CHECKLIST ISO/IEC 17021:2011 Conformity Assessment Requirements for Bodies Providing Audit and Certification of Management Systems

Presentation by BSI on the main changes to the IATF ISO/TS certification scheme

APPROVAL PROCESS FOR BASIC NURSING EDUCATION PROGRAMS

Australian Social Work Education and Accreditation Standards (ASWEAS) Guideline 1.6: Guidance on new programs

The EFGCP Report on The Procedure for the Ethical Review of Protocols for Clinical Research Projects in Europe (Update: April 2011) Denmark

ONTARIO REGULATION proposed to be made under the

Aarhus Graduate School of Business and Social Sciences

Guidelines For Graduate Studies In Biology The Master of Science in Biology

CHECKLIST OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE CIPFA CODE OF PRACTICE FOR INTERNAL AUDIT

Chapter 7 Human Resources

FACULTY GUIDELINES FOR ACADEMIC APPEALS Approved By the Administrative Board of the College of Arts and Sciences

McKenzie Towne Continuing Care Centre (MTCC) Update January 22, 2014

UCI GRADUATE POLICY ON SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS FOR FINANCIAL AID (EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2011)

Pages: 9 Date: 03/13/2012 Subject: Credentialing and Recredentialing. Prepared By: MVBCN Clinical Director

Harvard Medical School Portugal Program in Translational Research and Information. Terms of Reference for the 2011 Calls for Proposals

Canadian Arts Data / Données sur les Arts au Canada. Request for Proposals to Provide Management Services

UQAIB UNIVERSITY QUALITY ASSURANCE INTERNATIONAL BOARD

OUTDATED. 1. A completed University of Utah admission application and processing fee.

POLICY NUMBER: C450B SUPERSEDES: C450A. Policy to Encourage the Designation and Rehabilitation of Municipal Historic Resources in Edmonton

MERIT SELECTION PROCEDURES 2005

Progen Pharmaceuticals Limited ABN

American Culinary Federation Education Foundation Secondary Certification Initial Application Inquiry Packet

La Trobe University is committed to maintaining a comprehensive and effective Compliance Framework.

GAO SPECIAL EDUCATION. Clearer Guidance Would Enhance Implementation of Federal Disciplinary Provisions

Guide to Intervention for Federally Regulated Life Insurance Companies

AUDIT AND RISK MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE CHARTER

LEBANESE MINISTRY OF HEALTH DIRECTIVE

To be making satisfactory academic progress, a student must comply following criteria.

Transcription:

Canadian Council on Animal Care Conseil canadien de protection des animaux Certification of Animal Care and Use Programs This policy combines and supersedes the CCAC policy statement on: compliance and non-compliance (2000) and the CIHR and NSERC Policy on Non-compliance (2000) 1. The CCAC Certification Process The Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC) assesses and certifies animal care and use programs of organizations conducting animal-based work in research, teaching, testing or production (of animals or biologics for scientific purposes). An institution s animal care and use program is certified based on institutional compliance with CCAC policies and guidelines and other relevant standards (see Appendix I Requirements for obtaining a first CCAC Certificate, Appendix II Requirements for maintaining CCAC certification and Appendix III Requirements for indirect CCAC certification). This compliance is assessed through: institutional documentation; CCAC site visits; and institutional responses to CCAC recommendations. A visual depiction of the certification process is given in Appendix IV Timeline for CCAC certification. Additional information on the Assessment Program can be found in the CCAC policy statement on: definitions of recommendations made in CCAC reports, the CCAC policy statement on: assessment panels, and the CCAC policy statement on: the assessment program of the CCAC. 1.1 The CCAC Certificate of GAP - Good Animal Practice Two types of certificates can be awarded by the CCAC Assessment Committee on behalf of CCAC Council: 1.1.1 the CCAC Certificate of GAP - Good Animal Practice is awarded to institutions with sound animal care and use programs, as determined by the CCAC Assessment Committee working with the CCAC assessment panel(s); the certificate is provided to institutions that have earned a status of Compliance or Conditional Compliance, as assigned by the CCAC Assessment Committee (see sections 2.1 Status of Compliance and 2.2. Status of Conditional Compliance); and, CCAC policy statement

2 1.1.2 the CCAC Probationary Certificate of GAP - Good Animal Practice is awarded to institutions that are assigned a status of Probation because they have significant, unresolved deficiencies in their animal care and use program, as determined by the CCAC Assessment Committee working with the CCAC assessment panel(s) (see section 2.3 Status of Probation). The Probationary Certificate is valid for a period of one year. An institution s CCAC Certificate of GAP - Good Animal Practice or Probationary Certificate of GAP - Good Animal Practice is removed when the institution is assigned a status of Non-compliance (see sections 2.4 Status of Non-compliance and 3 Removal of the CCAC Certificate of GAP - Good Animal Practice or the Probationary Certificate of GAP Good Animal Practice and change in category of certification). The CCAC works closely with institutions to resolve difficulties in implementing CCAC recommendations. The CCAC Assessment Committee may recommend at any time that a special visit of an institution be undertaken by the assessment director(s) to evaluate the implementation of recommendations. The findings of a special visit may be used by the Assessment Committee to modify the status of an institution. 1.2 Changes Within a Certified Program Certified institutions must advise the CCAC before any of the following planned major changes to their program are implemented: 1.2.1 significant change(s) in the structure of the animal care and use program, such as: 1.2.1.1 a new faculty, department, research centre or other unit in which animals will be used; 1.2.1.2 changes in senior positions; 1.2.1.3 changes in reporting lines; 1.2.2 significant change(s) in the types of animals used or the nature of the work conducted with them (such as introduction of animal-based research in an institution that has only used animals for teaching, introduction of mammals in an institution that has only used non-mammalian species, new use of animals requiring specialized personnel and equipment, for example introduction of non-human primates); 1.2.3 significant change(s) in structure or function of the animal care committee (ACC) or committee(s); 1.2.4 resignation/retirement/replacement of senior members of the animal care and use program (senior administrator, ACC chair, veterinarian(s), facility director/manager), or changes in responsibilities of personnel; 1.2.5 new animal facilities or major renovations to existing ones (i.e. 30% or more of the existing facility is affected by the renovation). The CCAC will take any such changes under advisement and decide whether more information, or a CCAC visit, is necessary.

3 2. CCAC Statuses 2.1 Status of Compliance An institution may be assigned a status of Compliance if: 2.1.1 the CCAC assessment report contains only Regular recommendations, and the institution submits an implementation report that is satisfactory to the CCAC Assessment Committee, working with the assessment panel(s); or 2.1.2 the CCAC assessment report contains Major and/or Serious recommendations whose implementation can be verified fully through documentation, and the institution submits an implementation report that is satisfactory to the CCAC Assessment Committee, working with the assessment panel(s). Institutions that are new to the CCAC Program are generally ineligible to receive a status of Compliance. The institution must be able to demonstrate that its ACC and animal care and use program more generally have been functioning well and meeting CCAC policies and guidelines for more than one year. 2.2 Status of Conditional Compliance An institution may be assigned a status of Conditional Compliance if: 2.2.1 the CCAC assessment report contains Regular recommendations, and the institution submits an implementation report that is not entirely satisfactory to the CCAC Assessment Committee, working with the assessment panel(s); or 2.2.2 the CCAC assessment report contains Major and/or Serious recommendations whose implementation cannot be verified fully through documentation, and the institution submits an implementation report that is satisfactory to the CCAC Assessment Committee, working with the assessment panel(s). 2.3 Status of Probation An institution may be assigned a status of Probation if: 2.3.1 the CCAC assessment report contains Major, Serious or Regular recommendations, and the institution does not submit the required implementation report(s); or 2.3.2 the CCAC assessment report contains Major or Serious recommendations, and the institution submits a report that is not satisfactory to the CCAC Assessment Committee, working with the assessment panel(s). An institution in Probation is given specific deadlines for responding to the CCAC s recommendations, within the probationary year. The CCAC Assessment Committee evaluates the progress made by the institution at each deadline. The Assessment Committee may remove the Probationary Certificate of GAP - Good Animal Practice if serious problems are not resolved within the given time frames. A thorough review of the institution s progress is undertaken at the end of the probationary period, and the institution s CCAC status is reviewed.

4 2.4 Status of Non-Compliance An institution may be assigned a status of Non-compliance if: 2.4.1 after being assigned a status of Probation, the institution fails to respond to the CCAC Assessment Committee s satisfaction to Major or Serious recommendations contained in CCAC reports, despite being given a specified period in which to do so; or 2.4.2 evidence of a major threat to animal health and well-being (animals being neglected, suffering, being held in very poor conditions) is found during a CCAC visit, for which the institution does not take immediate appropriate action. 3. Removal of the CCAC Certificate of GAP - Good Animal Practice or the Probationary Certificate of GAP Good Animal Practice and Changes in Category of Certification A status of Non-compliance is assigned to an institution for major, unresolved deficiencies in the animal care and use program, and the institution s CCAC Certificate of GAP - Good Animal Practice or Probationary Certificate of GAP Good Animal Practice is removed as a result. The consequences of certificate removal and changes in category of certification are detailed below for academic, government and private institutions. 3.1 Academic Institutions The senior administrator responsible for animal care and use in an academic institution, and the senior administrator responsible for animal care policy at the federal granting Agencies (in cases where the institution is eligible for granting Agency funds), are notified through a letter from the CCAC Executive Director when there is a change in the category of certification for an institution, when an institution either: 3.1.1 loses its Certificate of GAP Good Animal Practice and receives a Probationary Certificate of GAP Good Animal Practice ; 3.1.2 loses its Certificate of GAP Good Animal Practice (Non-compliance); 3.1.3 loses its Probationary Certificate of GAP Good Animal Practice (Non-compliance); 3.1.4 regains a Probationary Certificate of GAP Good Animal Practice after having been assigned a status of Non-compliance; 3.1.5 regains a Certificate of GAP Good Animal Practice after having been assigned a Probationary Certificate of GAP Good Animal Practice ; or 3.1.6 regains a Certificate of GAP Good Animal Practice after having been assigned a status of Non-compliance. The federal granting Agencies require that all institutions that use animals for research, teaching or testing hold valid CCAC certification (either the Certificate of GAP Good Animal Practice or the Probationary Certificate of GAP - Good Animal Practice ) in order to be

5 eligible for Agency research funds. The federal granting Agency Memorandum of Understanding on the Roles and Responsibilities in the Management of Federal Grants and Awards (MOU), and in particular Schedules 3, 8 and 9, detail the roles and responsibilities of the granting Agencies and of institutions that are eligible to apply for granting Agency funds. The procedures put in place by the granting Agencies in cases of CCAC Certificate removal (status of Non-compliance) are described in Schedule 8 at entry level 3. 3.2 Government Institutions Senior administrators with overall responsibility for animal care and use in government institutions are notified of any units of theirs that lose certification or have any other change in their category of certification. 3.3 Private Institutions The Chief Executive Officer of a private institution is notified if the institution loses its certification or has any other change in its category of certification. November 2010 For more information on these and other policies contact: Canadian Council on Animal Care 1510-130 Albert Street Ottawa ON Canada K1P 5G4 Tel.: (613) 238-4031 Fax: (613) 238-2837 E-mail: ccac@ccac.ca Website: http://www.ccac.ca

6 Appendix I Requirements for Obtaining a First CCAC Certificate Institutions wishing to be certified for the first time are invited to contact the Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC) Assessment Program for guidance and information tailored to their particular situation. They must have the following elements in place before their first full CCAC assessment visit: an active animal care committee (ACC), whose composition, authority, responsibilities and functioning are defined in written Terms of Reference based on the most recent version of the CCAC policy statement on: terms of reference for animal care committees; an animal use protocol form (or forms), according to the guidance contained in the CCAC policy statement on: terms of reference for animal care committees; complete protocols submitted by animal users for all existing and planned animal-based work, with the ACC having reviewed and made decisions on all ongoing protocols and any protocols planned for the near future. The protocol reviews should be based on relevant guidance (as found in the CCAC policy statement on: terms of reference for animal care committees, Section 3e) and documented in the minutes of one or more ACC meetings; a formal agreement or agreements for veterinary services, based on the main elements of the Canadian Association for Laboratory Animal Medicine Standards of Veterinary Care; trained, qualified personnel in sufficient numbers to care for all groups of animals seven days a week; programs based on CCAC guidance for: the training of animal users; post-approval monitoring; occupational health and safety, to cover all animal project related risks; and crisis management; where animal facilities are needed, they must either meet relevant CCAC guidance or a detailed plan with timelines must be in place describing how they will be improved to meet the guidance; the ACC must have visited all facilities for animal care or use, whether currently in use or designated for use, and must have approved of their use in one or more written site visit report(s).

7 Appendix II Requirements for Maintaining CCAC Certification Institutions wishing to maintain Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC) certification must ensure that: their Animal Care Committee (ACC) remains active and functional, meeting at least twice every year, visiting all animal facilities at least once every year and fulfilling all of the responsibilities described in the CCAC policy statement on: terms of reference for animal care committees, including post-approval monitoring of animal care and use; their veterinary and animal care services continue to meet institutional needs and CCAC standards; their training, occupational health and safety and crisis management programs are relevant, complete, up-to-date and in line with CCAC guidance; their facilities (if required) meet institutional needs and CCAC standards.

8 Appendix III Requirements for Indirect CCAC Certification An institution may undertake or wish to undertake animal-based work on a small scale, but does not wish to become certified by the Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC). In this case, the animal care and use program can be indirectly certified if another fully certified institution is willing to be the responsible institution. The two institutions in the agreement would remain independent and functionally separate. In such a case, there must be a formal, written agreement between the senior administrations of the two institutions. The certified institution s animal care committee (ACC) or its representatives must first meet with the persons who will be involved in animal care and use at the uncertified institution and assess any animal facilities to be used before the formal agreement between the two institutions is signed. The formal agreement must include the following points: that the certified institution s ACC review any and all proposed animal use in science by members of the uncertified institution, that no animal use begin before it has been approved by the ACC, and that any and all conditions defined by the ACC be followed; that the certified institution s ACC follow up on animal use at the uncertified institution through a post-approval monitoring mechanism (including site visits by the ACC and oversight by qualified animal care and veterinary personnel); that animal use by the uncertified institution take place under clearly specified parameters, including: a definition of the nature of the animal use; the arrangements for veterinary services; the person(s) responsible for animal care; the person(s) responsible for animal use; the qualifications and training of animal caretakers and animal users (in accordance with CCAC guidance); and measures to ensure the occupational health and safety of all stakeholders; that CCAC guidance be followed for all animal use, whether in indoor facilities or in the field. The CCAC must be informed of any such proposed agreements before they are signed. The Assessment Program requires that information relative to the oversight of the uncertified institution be available to it through the certified institution, and may choose to visit either institution as needed.

9 Appendix IV Timeline for CCAC Certification

10 1 Institutions are asked to submit pre-assessment documentation (Program Review Form or Program Review Form for Interim Visits) to the CCAC three to four weeks before the assessment visit. 2 Assessment reports are normally sent to the institution within ten weeks of the visit. Certification will occur as soon as the CCAC Assessment Committee is satisfied that the institutional animal care and use program meets all relevant CCAC requirements. This can be at the time the assessment report is sent to the institution (within two and a half months) if there are no recommendations, or at any later time during the assessment process. 3 If the assessment report contains recommendations, institutions are asked to address them in an implementation report. Serious recommendations must be addressed within 3 months of receiving the assessment report, and Regular recommendations within 6 months. If the assessment report contains Major recommendations, the date by which these recommendations must be addressed will be specified in the assessment report. The CCAC normally addresses any institutional response to recommendations within eight weeks, making the certification process generally shorter when implementation reports are received before the deadlines. 4 The institution should normally respond to this update request with the implementation report on Regular recommendations. 5 In the majority of cases, the CCAC will limit its requests for updates on the implementation of recommendations to two letters per institution, prior to certification. 6 Updates can take any of the following forms: written documents, information provided by telephone or the organization of a special visit to the institution.