l. This is an action for equitable and statutory relief to contest an ad valorem tax



Similar documents
3. Collector is sued herein in his official capacity and is a necessary party to. CiVL DIVISION

1. This is an action to contest the decision of the Lee County Value. 2. At all times material herein, the Property Appraiser was the duly elected

1. The Plaintiffs, FS ORLANDO II LLC and FS ORLANDO GOLF LLC -1- COMPLAINT

l. This is an action for a declaratory judgment and to challenge the removal of a

1., This is an action for declaratory reiief conccrniirg certain ad rralorem real. Iriling NN E-Filed 081 todal 09:27:19 AM

SIXTH CIVIL DIVISION COMPLAINT: by and PRO SE, Hereby sues the Defendant and alleges:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

2. The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to Chapter 194, Florida Statutes, and Article V,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF] hereby sues the Defendants, [DEFENDANT #1], [DEFENDANT INTRODUCTION

How To Get A Court Order To Stop A Flat Fee From Being Charged In Florida

Case 5:06-cv XR Document 20 Filed 09/28/06 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

CASE NO.: C O M P L A I N T. Defendant, HARBOR HOUSE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA, INC., f/k/a Spouse Abuse, Inc., a/k/a

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. Plaintiffs, VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR INSPECTION OF BOOKS AND RECORDS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. COMPLAINT

COUNTERCLAIM AGAINST PLAINTIFF ECOSMART, LLC AND THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT AGAINST CARLOS ANTONIO CABRERA

MOHAVE COUNTY JUSTICE COURT. If you want to file a SMALL CLAIMS ANSWER

OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS,

Plaintiffs, -against- IAS Part 5 Justice Kathryn E. Freed. WHEREAS Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of the State of New York

Pursuant to A.R.S , et seq., plaintiffs allege:

4:15-cv RBH Date Filed 01/29/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 1:09-cv JPO-JCF Document 362 Filed 08/04/15 Page 1 of 8 : : : : : : EXHIBIT A

Filing # Electronically Filed 12/29/ :48:06 PM

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

COMPLAINT PARTIES. 2. COGA promotes the expansion of oil and gas supplies, markets, and transportation infrastructure.

: : : : : : : : Plaintiffs, HOLLY SCHEPISI, NEIL McPHERSON, KEVIN DRAGAN, and

against the City of Miami, a municipality of the State of Florida, and Penelope Townsley, the INTRODUCTION

CASE NO.: COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, [PLAINTIFF S NAME], by and through her parent and natural guardian

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

CONTRACT FOR ASSESSMENT AND COLLECTION BETWEEN DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS AND THE TOWN OF ADDISON

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 05/24/10 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Defendant, by and through his attorneys LENOIR LAW FIRM, answering the complaint of plaintiff, upon information and belief,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT I.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF RICHMOND, STATE OF GEORGIA. NOW COMES the named plaintiff, for himse_if and all

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. Plaintiffs, C. A. NO. VS.

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

SMGW GOLDEN SANDS LLC, (F/K/A L ATELIER MIAMI BEACH) CONDOMINIUM Cooperating Broker Registration and Commission Agreement

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions. hb

JOINT SIMPLIFIED DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE

PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT

CITY OF FORT MYERS, ET AL., v. HEITMAN, ET AL., 4 So.2d 871, 148 Fla. 432, 1941 Fla.SCt 439. CITY OF FORT MYERS, a Municipal Corporation, et al.

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO BAIL BOND ACTIONS

Case 2:07-cv LED Document 1-1 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

RULE 21 FORECLOSURE, QUIET TITLE AND PARTITION ACTIONS (Amended after passage of 2008 H.B. 138, eff )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

Filing # E-Filed 05/17/ :58:08 AM

LTC ELITE, LLC MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENT

How To File A Lawsuit Against A Corporation In California

COUNTY ATTORNEY'S REPORT April 7, 2011

RULES OF THE TAX APPEAL COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF MONTEREY. No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff, by and through its attorneys, The Law Firm of Michael Levine, P.C.,

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT CHANCERY DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION CTC MEDIA, INC. (Pursuant to Section 242 and 245 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware)

Case 3:15-cv MLC-LHG Document 1 Filed 11/17/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION

SUPERINTENDENT S EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION THE NASDAQ STOCK MARKET LLC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

SECOND AMENDED ORDER DESIGNATING ALL CASES E-FILE AND SETTING FORTH CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS IN E-FILE CASES

APPENDIX A IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

ATTORNEY CONSULTATION AND FEE CONTRACT FOR CONTINGENCY CASES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Bryana Bible, SECOND AMENDED CLASS Plaintiff, Court File No. 12-cv RHK-JSM INTRODUCTION

Case 3:14-cv HU Document 1 Filed 04/23/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELA WARE ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES OF DEFENDANT IHOR FIGLUS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI

JOHN MURRAY ( Murray ), for his Complaint in this action against Defendant, Crystex Composites LLC ( Crystex ), alleges as follows:

Case 8:13-cv EAK-TBM Document 14 Filed 05/20/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID 49 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv AJS Document 1 Filed 08/22/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/17/2014 INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/17/2014

Case DOT Doc 1 Filed 09/22/11 Entered 09/22/11 17:34:47 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 10

Please see Section IX. for Additional Information:

No. 45TH. Plaintiff EDGEWOOD INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT files its Original Petition

Plaintiffs, Defendants. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff, Rebecca Weston, hereby accepts the Offer of

Case 4:13-cv RAS-DDB Document 141 Filed 11/17/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 2035

May 23, 1996 AGO Mr. James D. Palermo Tampa City Attorney 315 East Kennedy Boulevard Fifth Floor Tampa, Florida Dear Mr.

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM S-8 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF Delaware

Case 6:16-cv Document 1 Filed 02/23/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 87

Loan Agreement (Short Form)

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY OPERATING AGREEMENT FOR

TAX OBJECTION COMPLAINT PACKET

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 03/11/15 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Transcription:

Filing # 36567355 E-Filed 0l/1412016 l2:42:48pm IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ST. LUCIE COLINTY, FLORIDA CNIL ACTION COASTAL QSR, LLC, vs. Plaintiff, CASE NO.: s620r6ca000081 (oc) DIVISION; Judge William L. Roby KEN PRUITT, as St. Lucie County Property Appraiser, CHRIS CRAFT, as St. Lucie County Tax Collector, and MARSHALL STRANBURG, as the Executive Director of the Florida Department of Revenue, Defendants. COMPLAINT Plaintiff, COASTAL QSR, LLC, ("Coastal"), sues Defendants, KEN PRUITT, as St. Lucie County Property Appraiser ("Property Appraiser"), CHRIS CRAFT, as St. Lucie County Tax Collector ("Tax Collector"), and MARSHALL STRANBURG, as the Executive Director of the Florida Department of Revenue ("Executive Director"), and alleges as follows: l. This is an action for equitable and statutory relief to contest an ad valorem tax assessment for the tax year 2015. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to Section 194.171(l), Florida Statutes, and Article V, Sections 5 and20 of the Florida Constitution. 2. Plaintifl Coastal, is a Delaware limited liability company authorized to conduct business in the State of Florida. 3. Coastal is the taxpayer of record and the party responsible for payment of taxes for certain real property located in St. Lucie County, Florida assessed under Parcel I.D. No. 2415-311-0007-010-7 having an address of 1812 S. U.S. Highway l, Fort Pierce, Florida (the "subject Property"), which is owned by St. Lucie Bells, LLC ("Owner").

4. Coastal has obtained the written consent of the Owner to file this action and, as the party responsible for payment of taxes, Coastal has standing to bring this action to contest the 2015 ad valorem tax assessment on the Subject Property. 5. Defendant, Property Appraiser, lawfully holds the office of Property Appraiser of St. Lucie County, Florida. Property Appraiser is sued herein in his official capacity and is a necessary party to this action pursuant to Section 194.181(2), Florida Statutes. 6. Defendant, Tax Collector, is the duly appointed and acting tax collector for St. Lucie County, Florida. Tax Collector is sued herein in his official capacity and is a necessary party to this action pursuant to Section 194.181(3), Florida Statutes. 7. Defendant, Executive Director, is sued herein in his official capacity and is a necessary party to this action pursuant to Section 194.181(5), Florida Statutes because the tax assessment is also being contested on the grounds that it is contrary to the laws and Constitution of the State of Florida. 8. Coastal files this action to contest the assessment of ad valorem taxes for 2015 upon the Subject Property. 9. Property Appraiser certified the assessment of the Subject Property for valorem purposes in 2015 in the amount of One million, two hundred ninety nine thousand, ad six hundred dollars and no cents ($1,299,600.00). 10. Based on that assessment, Tax Collector demanded payment for ad valorem taxes (hereafter the "Demanded Taxes") plus certain non-ad valorem assessments. 11. Coastal paid in full the Demanded Taxes as adjusted to reflect a discount for being postmarked by November 30, 2010. A true and correct copy of the tax receipt is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein. SLK_TAM:#2465886v1 Page 2 of5

12. Coastal timely filed a petition with the St. Lucie County Value Adjustment Board (the "VAB"), seeking a reduction in the assessment for the Subject Property to Five Hundred Thirteen One Hundred Six Dollars and no cents ($513,146.00). 13. The VAB entered a decision dated December 10, 2015 granting, in part, the relief requested by Coastal by reducing the assessment of the Subject Property to One Million Dollars and no cents ($1,000,000). 14. Coastal has performed all conditions precedent to the filing of this action, including timely filing this action pursuant to Section 194.171, Florida Statutes. 15. Property Appraiser's assessment of the Subject Property, as adjusted by the VAB, is unlawful and invalid because Property Appraiser failed to properly consider one or more of the factors enumerated in Section 193.011, Florida Statutes. 16. Additionally, Property Appraiser's assessment of the adjusted by the VAB, was arbitrarily based on appraisal practices which Subject Property, as are different from the appraisal practices generally applied by the Property Appraiser to comparable property within the same class within St. Lucie County. 17. Property Appraiser's assessment of the Subject Property, as adjusted by the VAB, exceeds the just value and, therefore, violates Article VII, Section 4 of the Florida Constitution. 18. Property Appraiser's failure to properly consider the factors set forth in Section 193.011, Florida Statutes and all other Florida Statutes relating thereto renders the assessment of the Subject Property, as adjusted by the VAB, inaccurate, illegal, arbitrary, and violative of established requirements of law in determining the just valuation of real property for ad valorem taxation purposes. SLK_TAM:#2465886v1 Page 3 of5

19. Based in part on the aboveo Property Appraiser's assessment is not entitled to any presumption of correctness pursuant to Section 194.301, Florida Statutes. 20. Coastal will be irreparably damaged if Defendants are permitted to keep the collection of the full tax paid based on the unlawful 2015 assessment. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, COASTAL QSR, LLC, demands that this Court take jurisdiction over this cause and further demands judgment as follows: 1. Declaring the assessment to be in excess ofjust value and setting aside the assessment on the Subject Property; 2. 3. Establishing the proper assessment for the Subject conformance with applicable Florida law; Directing Defendant, Chris Craft, St. Lucie County Tax cancel the original bills, issue new bills in the reassessed return to Coastal all amounts of ad valorem taxes paid in Property in Collector, to amounts, and excess of the correct amount based on a proper assessment; 4. Awarding Plaintiff its costs incurred in bringing this action pursuant to Section 194.192(l), Florida Statutes; and 5. Granting Plaintiff such other and further relief as deemed just and equitable. DATED: January 14,2016 SLK TAM:#2465886v1 Page 4 of5

SHUMAKER, LOOP & KENDRICK, LLP By: /s/ Mark A. Connolly MARK A. CONNOLLY Florida Bar No. 0015751 mconnolly@slk-law.com (Primary E-Mail) mkulczycke@slk-law.com (Secondary E-Mail) 101 East Kennedy Blvd., Suite 2800 Tampa, Florida 33602-5151 Telephone (813) 229-7 600 Fax (813) 229-1660 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Coastal QSR, LLC SLK TAM:#2465886v1 Page 5 of5