l. This is an action for a declaratory judgment and to challenge the removal of a
|
|
|
- Andrea Gilbert
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA WALTER PALASZ AND LYNN PALASZ. Plaintiffs, LORI PARRISH, as Property Appraiser of Broward County, Florida, THOMAS KENNEDY, as Tax Collector of Broward County, Florida,and MARSHALL STRANBURG, as Executive Director of the Florida Department of Revenue, Defendants. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF Plaintiffs. Walter Palasz and Lynn Palasz, sue Defendants, Lori Parrish, as Property Appraiser of Broward County, Florida ("Appraiser"), Thomas Kennedy, as Tax Collector of Broward County, Florida ("Co11ector"), and Marshall Stranburg. as Executive Director of the Florida Department of Revenue ("Department"), and allege: l. This is an action for a declaratory judgment and to challenge the removal of a homestead exemption on property in Broward County, Florida and the imposition of a tax lien. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to Chapter 194, Florida Statutes, article V, sections 5 and 20 of the Florida Constitution, and section , Florida Statutes. 2. Plaintiffs, Walter Palasz and Lynn Palasz, are the owlers of certain real property located at I 03 NE l gth Ave. #246 in Deerfield Beach, Florida and identified as Parcel No AE-974 f"subject Property"], which is classified and assessed as owner-occupied residential property.
2 3. Appraiser is sued herein in her official capacity and is a necessary party to the action pursuant to section (2), Florida Statutes. 4. Collector is sued herein in his official capacity and is a necessary party to the action pursuant to section (3), Florida Statutes. 5. Defendant Marshall Stranburg is sued herein in his official capacity and is a necessily party to the action pursuant to section (5), Florida Statutes. 6. From 2001 to and including January 7,2075,the Plaintiffs owned the Subject Property and made it their permanent residence. Count l: Removal of Tax Lien 7. The Plaintiffs reallege and incorporate by reference paragraphs I -6 of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein. 8. The Plaintiffs applied for and received a homestead exemption on the Subject Property in the 2002 tax year. They continued to receive the homestead exemption on the property through the 2013 tax year. 9. On June 26, 2014, Appraiser sent the Plaintiff a Notice of Intent to File Lien ["Lien Notice"] notifying them that the homestead exemption on the Subject Property would be retroactively removed for the 2Q tax years. A copy of the Lien Notice is attached as Exhibit 'oa" and incorporated herein. The Lien Notice stated that the reason for the removal of the homestead exemption was "Not Owner's Primary Residence." 10. The Property Appraiser recorded a tax lien against the Subject Property on August 11,2014. A copy of the Notice of Lien is attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein,
3 I 1. Section , Florida Statutes allows the Property Appraiser to file a tax lien against property of a taxpayer who was granted a homestead exemption to which they were not entitled for any year or years within the prior 10 years. 12. However, the Plaintiffs were entitled to the homestead exemption on the Subject Property in the tax years, pursuant to article VII, section 6 of the Florida Constitution and section , Florida Statutes. Thus, the Property Appraiser's retroactive removal of the homestead exemption and imposition of a tax lien was unlawful. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand that this Court enter an order reinstating the 2006 through 2013 homestead exemptions on the subject property; cancelling the tax lien; awarding Plaintiffs their costs incurred in bringing this action pursuant to section , Florida Statutes; and awarding such other general relief as may be just and equitable. Count 2: Reinstatement of 2014 Homestead Exemption 13. The Plaintiffs re-ailege and incorporate by reference paragraphs 1-6 of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein. 14. On June 13,2014, Appraiser sent the Plaintiff anotice of Denial of Ad Valorem Property Tax Exemption ["2014 Notice of Denial"] notifying them that the homestead exemption on the Subject Property would be denied for the 2074tax year. A copy of the Notice is attached as Exhibit "C" and incorporated herein. The Notice stated that the reason for the denial of the homestead exemption was "[o]wners' primary residence is in Massachusetts." 15. Plaintiffs have paid the 2014 taxes on the Subject Property in full, pursuant to section (3)(4), Florida Statutes. A copy of the receipt for payment of the 2014 taxes is attached as Exhibit "D."
4 16. Plaintiffs have performed all conditions precedent which are required to be performed by Plaintiff in establishing their right to bring this action. Specifically, this action has been filed within the time period prescribed by section , Florida Statutes. 17. The notice of denial of the 2014 homestead exemption for the Subject Property did not meet the specificity requirements of section (5), Florida Statutes. Thus, the notice was invalid and ineffective to remove the 2014 homestead exemption. 18. Moreover, the Plaintiffs were entitled to the homestead exemption on the Subject Property in 2014, pursuant to article VII, section 6 of the Florida Constitution and section , Florida Statutes, and thus the Appraiser's denial of the homestead exemption was unlaufirl. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand that this Court enter an order reinstating the 2014 homestead exemption on the Subject Property, ordering the Collector to cancel the original tax bill, issue new tax bills that reflect the2014 homestead exemption, and to refund any overpayments; awarding Plaintiffs their costs incurred in bringing this action pursuant to section lg4.lgz,florida Statutes; and awarding such other general relief as may be just and equitable. Count 3: Reinstatementof 2.0l5-ll"qn$egteadBxgmnt&ut- 19. Plaintiffs re-allege and incorporate by reference paragraphs 1-6 of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein. tax year. 20. The Plaintiffs filed a timely application for a homestead exemption for the On June 1.,2015, Appraiser sent the Plaintiff a Notice of Disapproval of Application for Property Tax Exemption ["2015 Notice of Denial"] notiffing them that their
5 application for a homestead exemption on the Subject Property would be denied for the 2015 tax year. A copy of the Notice is attached as Exhibit "E" and incorporated herein. 22. At the time this case was filed, the 2015 taxes on the Subject Property were not yet due and owing. Thus, the Plaintiffs were not required by section Q), Florida Statutes to pay any taxes for the 2015 tax year prior to the filing of this action. 23. Plaintiffs have performed all conditions precedent which are required to be performed by Plaintiffs in establishing their right to bring this action. Specifically, this action has been flled within the time period prescribed by section Q), Florida Statutes. 24. The Plaintiffs were entitled to the homestead exemption on the Subject Property in 2015, pursuant to article VII, section 6 of the Florida Constitution and section , Florida Statutes, and thus the Appraiser's denial of the homestead exemption was unlawful. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand that this Court enter an order reinstating the 2015 homestead exemption on the Subject Property, ordering the Collector to issue tax bills that reflect the 2015 homestead exemption, and to refund any overpayments; awarding Plaintiffs their costs incurred in bringing this action pursuant to section , Florida Statutes; and awarding such other general relief as may be just and equitable. e JoHNSoN LEGAL of FLoRIDA, P.L Marquesas Cir. Suite 208 P.O. Box Sarasota, FL (e41) e26-fiss Fax: (941) sj ohnson@johnsqnle galfl.com Attomey for Plaintiffs Walter and Lynn Palasz L. JOHNSON Florida Bar No
3. Collector is sued herein in his official capacity and is a necessary party to. CiVL DIVISION
Filing # 35115099 E-Filed tzl03l20l5 01:13:08 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CiVL DIVISION WESTSHORE CLUB HOLDING LLC, a Florida corporation,
2. The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to Chapter 194, Florida Statutes, and Article V,
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE llth JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA ISABEL CRISTINA ECHEVERRI, CASE NO. VS. Plaintifl PEDRO J. GARCIA, as Miami Dade County Property Appraiser, MARCUS
1., This is an action for declaratory reiief conccrniirg certain ad rralorem real. Iriling NN 30646471 E-Filed 081 todal 09:27:19 AM
Iriling NN 30646471 E-Filed 081 todal 09:27:19 AM IN TI.IE CIRCUI'f COUI{]' OF I'iI t.j FIIJ]EEN'I'H J UDICiAL CIRCU]T IN AND FOR PALM BEACI{ COUNTY, FLORIDA CiVIL DIVISION FR/CAr- 3 SOUTII FLORIDA,LLC,
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA DEAN KUMANCHIK, vs. Plaintiff, Case No.: UNIVERSAL CITY DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LTD d/b/a UNIVERSAL STUDIOS, a Florida
1. This is an action to contest the decision of the Lee County Value. 2. At all times material herein, the Property Appraiser was the duly elected
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION KENNETH M. WILKINSON, C.F.A., as Property Appraiser of Lee County, Florida, Plaintiff, V. Case No.:
1. The Plaintiffs, FS ORLANDO II LLC and FS ORLANDO GOLF LLC -1- COMPLAINT
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA FS ORLANDO II LLC, and FS ORLANDO GOLF LLC, Plaintiffs, CASE NO. Ao rb - C A- @4o 81 - o zuck SINGH, as the Property
COMPLAINT. Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF] hereby sues the Defendants, [DEFENDANT #1], [DEFENDANT INTRODUCTION
Form 2:40-2 Complaint Negligence, Motor Vehicle IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ## JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR [COUNTY], FLORIDA [PLAINTIFF], Plaintiff, CASE NO.: ##-##### ## ## GENERAL JURISDICTION vs. [DEFENDANT
How To Get A Court Order To Stop A Flat Fee From Being Charged In Florida
MICHAEL BARFIELD, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH CIRCUIT IN AND FOR SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA Plaintiff, Case No.: IMMEDIATE HEARING v. REQUESTED PURSUANT TO Fla. Stat. 119.11 (2009) BERNADETTE DIPINO,
AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. KIM WALLANT and LOUIS BOREK, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiffs, FREEDOM
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION COMPLAINT
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION Plaintiff, CASE NUMBER: JUDGE: vs. Defendant. / COMPLAINT COMES NOW, Plaintiff,, and hereby sues
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. COMPLAINT
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, and THE OFFICE OF THE STATE ATTORNEY
61.14 Enforcement and modification of support, maintenance, or alimony agreements or orders.--
Florida Statutes 61.14 Enforcement and modification of support, maintenance, or alimony agreements or orders.-- (1)(a) When the parties enter into an agreement for payments for, or instead of, support,
COMPLAINT. sues Defendants Eastern Florida State College and Dr. Janies H. Richey and says:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOR THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: DIVISION: FLORIDA CARRY, INC, a Florida non-profit corporation, v. Plaintiff, EASTERN FLORIDA STATE COLLEGE,
CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions. hb0087-00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A bill to be entitled An act relating to mortgage foreclosures; amending s. 95.11, F.S.; revising the limitations period for commencing
Case 9:15-cv-80366-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2015 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.
Case 9:15-cv-80366-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2015 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ARRIVAL STAR, SA, and MELVINO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, Case No.: v.
SIXTH CIVIL DIVISION COMPLAINT: by and PRO SE, Hereby sues the Defendant and alleges:
SIXTH F'LORI CIVIL DIVISION case NO. 14-1160 CI7 Vs. Plaintiff, PAMELA DEBOV, as Pinellas County Property Appra DIANE NELSON, as Pinellas county Tax Collector and THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT F REVENUE, Defendants,
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 7 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA COMPLAINT FOR DISABILITY INSURANCE BENEFITS
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 7 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA BENJAMIN T. BROWN, Plaintiff, CASE NO. v. NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; A foreign corporation. Defendant.
Notice of Class Action Settlement
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION KOTA OF SARASOTA, INC. individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff,
vs. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff JAMES SCHAIRER, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby sues
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE th 16 JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION CASE NO. JAMES SCHAIRER, individually, Plaintiff, vs. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PAUL KERCHER,
Case 5:06-cv-00503-XR Document 20 Filed 09/28/06 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION
Case 5:06-cv-00503-XR Document 20 Filed 09/28/06 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, VS. Plaintiff, HENRY D. GOLTZ, EVANGELINA
MAINE REVENUE SERVICES PROPERTY TAX DIVISION PROPERTY TAX BULLETIN NO. 10
MAINE REVENUE SERVICES PROPERTY TAX DIVISION PROPERTY TAX BULLETIN NO. 10 PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT AND APPEALS PROCEDURES REFERENCE: Title 36 MRSA, Sections 583, 706, 841-849 and 1118 Issued July 2010; Replaces
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION WAYNE WILLIAMS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, PROTECT SECURITY, LLC. Defendant.
CASE NO.: COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, [PLAINTIFF S NAME], by and through her parent and natural guardian
Form 2:150 Dog Bite Sample Complaint IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COUNTY, FLORIDA [PLAINTIFF S NAME], by and through her parent and natural guardian, [PLAINTIFF S PARENT S
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER
Case 1:14-cv-05919-JEI-KMW Document 19 Filed 02/13/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 84 Frank L. Corrado, Esquire Attorney ID No. 022221983 BARRY, CORRADO & GRASSI, PC 2700 Pacific Avenue Wildwood, NJ 08260 (609)
CASE NO.: C O M P L A I N T. Defendant, HARBOR HOUSE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA, INC., f/k/a Spouse Abuse, Inc., a/k/a
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CAROL WICK, vs. Plaintiff, HARBOR HOUSE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA, INC., f/k/a Spouse Abuse, Inc., a/k/a Harbor House,
Authority for the County Attorney to Initiate Litigation in the Case of Pinellas County v. Verizon Florida, LLC
TO: FROM: SUBJECT: The Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board of County Commissioners James L. Bennett, County Attorney Authority for the County Attorney to Initiate Litigation in the Case of Pinellas
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No.: COMPLAINT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION NANCY PRITCHARD, v. Plaintiff, Case No.: KAPLAN HIGHER EDUCATION CORPORATION; KAPLAN HIGHER EDUCATION CORPORATION, as PLAN ADMINISTRATOR;
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DISABILITY INSURANCE BENEFITS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION FREDERICK FREEMAN, Plaintiff, CASE NO. v. MONARCH LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; A foreign corporation. Defendant. / COMPLAINT FOR DISABILITY
SUPPLEMENTAL FINAL JUDGMENT MODIFYING PARENTAL RESPONSIBILILTY, VISITATION, OR PARENTING PLAN/TIME-SHARING SCHEDULE AND OTHER RELIEF
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR COUNTY, FLORIDA, Petitioner, Case No.: Division: and, Respondent. SUPPLEMENTAL FINAL JUDGMENT MODIFYING PARENTAL RESPONSIBILILTY, VISITATION, OR
COUNTERCLAIM AGAINST PLAINTIFF ECOSMART, LLC AND THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT AGAINST CARLOS ANTONIO CABRERA
Case 1:12-cv-20231-JAL Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/23/2012 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ECOSMART US, LLC a Florida Limited Liability Company,
Case 1:15-cv-00553 Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:15-cv-00553 Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE 1899 L Street, NW, 12 th Floor Washington, DC 20036 Plaintiff,
Please see Section IX. for Additional Information:
The Florida Senate BILL ANALYSIS AND FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT (This document is based on the provisions contained in the legislation as of the latest date listed below.) BILL: CS/SB 972 Prepared By: The
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Order Number 2009-12-Civ
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA Order Number 2009-12-Civ ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER ESTABLISHING SUMMARY JUDGMENT FORECLOSURE PROCEDURES (a) Florida
COMPLAINT PARTIES. 2. COGA promotes the expansion of oil and gas supplies, markets, and transportation infrastructure.
DISTRICT COURT, BOULDER COUNTY, COLORADO 1777 Sixth Street Boulder, CO 80302 Plaintiff: COLORADO OIL & GAS ASSOCIATION v. Defendant: COURT USE ONLY Case No. Division/Courtroom: CITY OF LAFAYETTE, COLORADO
Case 3:09-cv-01222-MMH-JRK Document 33 Filed 08/10/10 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION
Case 3:09-cv-01222-MMH-JRK Document 33 Filed 08/10/10 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION PHL VARIABLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 3:09-cv-1222-J-34JRK
Case 1:14-cv-00896 Document 1 Filed 05/28/14 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:14-cv-00896 Document 1 Filed 05/28/14 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOHN W. DODSON, 1976 West Silver Rose Place Tucson, AZ 85737, Plaintiff, Civil
Plaintiffs, Defendants. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff, Rebecca Weston, hereby accepts the Offer of
07/15/2034 12:01 973-539-3130 Prom: D Bayle Loflls 201-488-7D29 To: Kalhryn Haffleld SCHENCK PRICE SMITH Date: 7/14/2004 Time: 12:45:04 PM PAGE 04/11 Page 3 of 5 LAW OFFICE D. GAYLELOFTIS 210 RI\/ER STREET
How To File A Lawsuit Against A Corporation In California
1 2 3 4 5 [ATTORNEY NAME] (ATTORNEY STATE BAR NUMBER) [ATTORNEY EMAIL ADDRESS] [LAW FIRM NAME] [LAW FIRM STREET ADDRESS] [LAW FIRM CITY/STATE/ZIP CODE] [LAW FIRM TELEPHONE NUMBER] [LAW FIRM FAX NUMBER]
WRITTEN TESTIMONY OF BRYAN C. SKARLATOS, ESQ. given it powers to collect money and property that far exceed those of any ordinary creditor.
WRITTEN TESTIMONY OF BRYAN C. SKARLATOS, ESQ. The Internal Revenue Service (the Service ) is a Super Creditor because Congress has given it powers to collect money and property that far exceed those of
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT I.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION JANICE LEE, ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) BETHESDA HOSPITAL, INC. ) ) Defendant. ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF MONTEREY. No.
TREVOR A. GRIMM, State Bar No. JONATHAN M. COUPAL, State Bar No. 1 TIMOTHY A. BITTLE, State Bar No. 00 Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Foundation 1 Eleventh Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 1 (1-0 Attorneys for
STATE OF ALABAMA ALABAMA LAW INSTITUTE
STATE OF ALABAMA ALABAMA LAW INSTITUTE ALABAMA REDEMPTION FROM AD VALOREM TAX SALES May 2008 ALABAMA LAW INSTITUTE 326 Law Center Post Office Box 861425 Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35486 (205) 348-7411 FAX (205)
Attorneys for Maricopa County Community College District Board IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA
O S B O R N M A L E D O N A P R O F E S S I O N A L A S S O C I A T I O N A T T O R N E Y S A T L A W The Phoenix Plaza 1st Floor North Central Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 01- P.O. Box Phoenix, Arizona 0-
Case 3:15-cv-00592-LAB-BLM Document 1 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-00-lab-blm Document Filed 0// Page of 0 ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. Attorney General VANITA GUPTA Acting Assistant Attorney General STEVEN H. ROSENBAUM Chief, Housing and Civil Enforcement Section ELIZABETH
CASE NO.: CIVIL DIVISION COMPLAINT. through undersigned counsel, and hereby sues Defendant, Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., a Florida GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, vs. Plaintiff, CASE NO.: CIVIL DIVISION WINN-DIXIE STORES, INC., Defendant, / COMPLAINT COMES NOW Plaintiff,,
Case 2:10-cv-01224-JCM-LRL Document 1 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 8
Case :0-cv-0-JCM-LRL Document Filed 0//0 Page of Reno, NV ( -00 Fax ( 0-0 0 Mark R. Thierman, NV# [email protected] THIERMAN LAW FIRM, P.C. Reno, Nevada Tel: ( -00 Fax: ( 0-0 David R. Markham, CAL#
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT CHANCERY DIVISION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT CHANCERY DIVISION Harris, NA f/k/a Harris Trust and ) and Savings Bank ) ) Plaintiff ) ) 09 CH 43873 v. ) ) Judge Jesse G. Reyes Ernest Taylor;
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE In Re: Chapter 7 Case No. 05-22665 Mikel W. Tuttle, d/b/a MT Construction, DMI Industries, Inc., and MT Construction, Inc., Debtor State of Maine, Adv.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL CIVIL DIVISION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL CIVIL DIVISION Plaintiff(s), v. Defendant(s). / CASE NO.: GENERAL CIVIL DIVISION: UNIFORM FINAL JUDGMENT
Case 1:15-cv-23825-KMW Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/28/2016 Page 1 of 8 UNTIED STATE DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:15-cv-23825-KMW Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/28/2016 Page 1 of 8 DAVID BALDWIN, v. Plaintiff, ANTHONY FOXX, in his official capacity as Secretary of The United States Department of Transportation,
MARC D. LAVIK, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : C.A. No. PC 11- : DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES, : DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, : STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, : COMPLAINT
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND PROVIDENCE, SC SUPERIOR COURT MARC D. LAVIK, Plaintiff, v. C.A. No. PC 11- DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, Defendant. COMPLAINT Parties and
CHAPTER 2013-137. Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 87
CHAPTER 2013-137 Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 87 An act relating to mortgage foreclosures; amending s. 95.11, F.S.; revising the limitations period for commencing an
This test letter is NOT to be sent to a taxpayer. This text does not appear on production letters.
Letter This test letter is NOT to be sent to a taxpayer. This text does not appear on production letters. Subject: Demand for payment and intent to levy wages This letter is to notify you of a debt referred
Case 3:14-cv-00671-HU Document 1 Filed 04/23/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Case 3:14-cv-00671-HU Document 1 Filed 04/23/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 1 OSB#013943 [email protected] Attorney At Law 4411 NE Tillamook St Portland, OR 97140 971-219-8453 Attorney for Plaintiff IN
Case 5:11-cv-00186-SWW Document 4 Filed 08/18/11 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Case 5:11-cv-00186-SWW Document 4 Filed 08/18/11 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION KYMBERLY L. WIMBERLY PLAINTIFF v. CASE NO. 5:11 CV 0186
Case 2:15-cv-00782 Document 1 Filed 03/11/15 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 2:15-cv-00782 Document 1 Filed 03/11/15 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA THOMAS MILTON BENSON, JR., in his capacity as GRANTOR OF THE RENEE BENSON 2009 IRREVOCABLE
STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OFMICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, v. Case No. Hon. Magistrate Judge UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
2:13-cv-12939-PJD-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 07/06/13 Pg 1 of 11 Pg ID 1 DETROIT FREE PRESS, a Michigan corporation, STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OFMICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Plaintiff, v. Case No. Hon.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA
STATE OF FLORIDA, ex rel. ROBERT A. BUTTERWORTH, Attorney General of Florida, Individually and in His Representative or Parens Patriae Capacity, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
Supreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida POLSTON, J. No. SC14-1282 VICKI THOMAS, et al., Appellants, vs. CLEAN ENERGY COASTAL CORRIDOR, etc., et al., Appellees. [October 1, 2015] This case is before the Court on appeal
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION COMPLAINT. COMES NOW, the Plaintiff, JOSEPH DELFRATE, and sues the Defendant,
Case 8:10-cv-01091-SDM-AEP Document 1 Filed 05/10/10 Page 1 of 8 JOSEPH DELFRATE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION vs. Plaintiff, CASE NO. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO, and Civil Action
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION SMILEBOND SYSTEMS LLC, a Michigan Limited Liability Company, v. Plaintiff, GC AMERICA INC. an Illinois Corporation,
- "'. --, ,-~ ') " UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Federal Trade Commission,
- "'. --, -.:li ') " :::; ),-~ --' DA VlD SHONKA Acting General Counsel 2 BARBARA Y.K. CHUN, Cal. BarNo. 0 3 JOHN D. JACOBS, Cal. Bar No. 1344 Federal Trade Commission 4 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 00 Los Angeles,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION RPOST HOLDINGS, INC., RPOST COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED, and RMAIL LIMITED, CIVIL ACTION NO. Plaintiffs, v. ADOBE SYSTEMS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
Case 4:14-cv-00397-RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 07/29/14 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION JOSEPH REILLY, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, ex rel. ) CASE NO. ATTORNEY GENERAL ) MICHAEL DEWINE ) JUDGE 30 E. Broad St., 14 th Floor ) Columbus, Ohio 43215 ) ) PLAINTIFF, ) ) V.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION
W. ANDREW MCCULLOUGH, L.L.C. (2170) Attorney for Plaintiffs 6885 South State St., Suite 200 Midvale, UT 84047 Telephone: (801) 565-0894 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL
Case 1:16-cv-03280 Document 1 Filed 05/03/16 Page 1 of 8
Case 116-cv-03280 Document 1 Filed 05/03/16 Page 1 of 8 PREET BHARARA United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York By REBECCA C. MARTIN ANDREW E. KRAUSE Assistant United States Attorneys
Case No.: CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF IMPLIED WARRANTY OF WORKMANSHIP AND HABITABILITY. Plaintiffs,
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Stephen L. Weber, Esq. (AZ SBN 01) Michael J. White, Esq. (AZ SBN 01) James W. Fleming, Esq. (AZ SBN 0) KASDAN SIMONDS WEBER & VAUGHAN LLP 00 N. Central Ave., Suite 0 Phoenix, AZ 0 E-Mail:
Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION. MARIA GODINEZ, an individual,
VACHON LAW FIRM Michael R. Vachon, Esq. (SBN ) 0 Via Del Campo, Suite San Diego, California Tel.: () -0 Fax: () - Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
Case 4:05-cv-01278-GTE Document 25 Filed 12/08/2005 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK DIVISION
Case 4:05-cv-01278-GTE Document 25 Filed 12/08/2005 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK DIVISION NATIONAL WILDLIFE FED N, ARKANSAS WILDLIFE FED N PLAINTIFF
FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION AND COLLECTIVE COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND
District Court, Denver County, Colorado 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202 GUILLERMO ARTEAGA-GOMEZ, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DATE FILED: January 22, 2015 6:02
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION INSTITUTE FOR CREATION RESEARCH GRADUATE SCHOOL, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. A:09 CA 382 TEXAS HIGHER EDUCATION COODINATING
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE MOBILE TRANSFORMATION LLC, Plaintiff, v. Civil Case No. A&E TELEVISION NETWORKS, LLC JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. COMPLAINT Plaintiff
State of New Hampshire Banking Department ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 09-060 NOTICE OF ORDER
1 In re the Matter of: State of New Hampshire Banking Department, and Petitioner, State of New Hampshire Banking Department First American Mortgage Trust (d/b/a NxtLoan.com, Shifra Nachama Polack, and
How to Write a Complaint
Federal Pro Se Clinic CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA How to Write a Complaint Step : Pleading Paper Complaints must be written on pleading paper. Pleading paper is letter-sized (8. x paper that has the
Case 15-23963 Doc 40 Filed 03/31/16 Entered 03/31/16 13:02:57 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 7
Document Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION MICHAEL A. LEWIS, Bankruptcy Petition No. 15-23963 Debtor. Chapter 13 ---------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION. Case No. 2:12-cv-45-FtM-29SPC OPINION AND ORDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION SOUTH BAY PLANTATION CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., a not for profit corporation also known as SOUTH BAY PLANTATION ASSOCIATES,
Part VIII RULES GOVERNING PRACTICE IN THE TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY TABLE OF CONTENTS
APPENDIX C - New Jersey Tax Court Rules Part VIII RULES GOVERNING PRACTICE IN THE TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY Rule 8:1. Rule 8:2. Rule 8:3. Rule 8:4. TABLE OF CONTENTS Scope: Applicability Review Jurisdiction
Complaint - Walmart Substance on Floor in Frozen Food Dept.
Home Slip and Fall - Pleadings Main Index - Complaint Walmart Frozen Food Dept Complaint - Walmart Substance on Floor in Frozen Food Dept. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD
UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE RICHARD MILLER, of the ) Town of Searsport, County of ) Waldo, State of Maine, ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) DALE MCCORMICK in her official capacity ) as Director and
BERMAN, KEAN & RIGUERA, P.A. 2101 W. Commercial Boulevard, Suite 2800, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33309 Tel. (954) 735-0000 www.bermankean.
Filing # 15622956 Electronically Filed 07/07/2014 04:43:43 PM GARY BITNER, an individual, and BITNER GOODMAN, INC., a Florida corporation, vs. Plaintiffs, MICHAEL GOODMAN, an individual, GOODMAN PUBLIC
4:14-cv-02261-PMD Date Filed 06/10/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10
4:14-cv-02261-PMD Date Filed 06/10/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION RICHARD REYNOLDS, SHARON LINICK, LINDA NEELY,
Case Number XXX I. INTRODUCTION. 1. Defendants E.G.O. and E.R.O., prepare immigration documents for customers for a
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DURHAM COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION Case Number XXX A.C.G., J.G.M., on behalf of themselves and ) all others similarly situated, ) Plaintiffs )
OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS,
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, Case No.: v. Plaintiff, BASS PRELITIGATION
TERRENCE and Marie Domin, Plaintiffs, v. SHELBY INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Defendant.
Circuit Court of Illinois. County Department Chancery Division Cook County TERRENCE and Marie Domin, Plaintiffs, v. SHELBY INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Defendant. No. 00CH08224. 2008. Answer
The State of New Jersey, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
STUART RABNER ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY R.J. Hughes Justice Complex 25 Market Street PO Box 093 Trenton, NJ 08625-0093 Attorney for Plaintiff State of New Jersey, New Jersey Department of Environmental
Plaintiff Carol Parker ( Plaintiff ), residing at 32 Coleman Way, Jackson, NJ 08527, by her undersigned counsel, alleges the following upon personal
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAROL PARKER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, PARADE ENTERPRISES, LLC, No. 3:14-CV-08084-MAS-DEA AMENDED COMPLAINT
COMPLAINT. Now come Plaintiffs, personal care attendants, consumers, surrogates,
DOCKET NO. SUPERIOR COURT Catherine D. Ludlum, : Amber L. Michaud, : The Connecticut Association of Personal : SUPERIOR COURT Assistance, Inc., : Senator Joseph Markley, : State Representative Robert C.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:13-cv-02282-RWS Document 1 Filed 07/09/13 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION DE ANGELO BENTLEY, ) MARQUES ROBERTSON, ) IKEYMA MCKENTRY, ) individually,
RULES OF THE TAX APPEAL COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I
RULES OF THE TAX APPEAL COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I (SCRU-13-0005988) Adopted and Promulgated by the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai i As amended March 6, 1981 Effective March 6, 1981 With Further
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CAROL LANNAN and ANN WINN, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. LEVY & WHITE and ROBERT R. WHITE, ESQ., Case No.
