GUIDE FOR FEED MANUFACTURERS TO COMPLY WITH THE FDA FINAL RULE PROHIBITING MAMMALIAN PROTEIN IN RUMINANT FEED



Similar documents
PRIOR NOTICE OF IMPORTED FOOD SHIPMENTS A

Safe%Feed/Safe%Food% Overview of Certification Programs: Why Should a Feed Mill Get Certified?

SQFI Guidance RE: Allergen Cleaning and Sanitation Practices

Requirements for transport sequence, cleaning and disinfection

Medicine Record Book

Department of Health and Human Services. No. 66 April 6, Part III

Decree N 152 (24 January 2013) Administrative Measure on Inspection, Quarantine and Supervision of Imports and Exports of Dairy products

It s all about managing food. Food Recall Plan Template For Food Manufacturers

ADVICE FOR OWNERS OF PET PIGS AND MICRO PIGS

United States Department of Agriculture Office of Inspector General

TAMPA BAY WATER Supplying Water To The Region

Helical Products Co., Inc.

Pelleting Process. Pelleting Process

USE BLUE OR BLACK INK ONLY. 1c. ARE YOU THE NEW OWNER OF A PREVIOUSLY REGISTERED FACILITY? Yes O No O

Components of an Effective Allergen Control Plan A FRAMEWORK FOR FOOD PROCESSORS

FOOD FACILITIES REGISTRATION OF. Protecting the U.S. Food Supply. What You Need to Know About

FDA Inspection Observations The FDA 483 and Beyond. Objectives

Complying with the Philadelphia Trans Fat Ban

Food Safety Modernization Act Sanitary Food Transportation Act Proposed Rule. Erik R. Lieberman February 18, 2014

Agribusiness Presentation Scott McCain, President & COO, Agribusiness Group

Fish Of The Order Siluriformes And Their Importance To FishCommercial Investigation Program

Road Haulage. Code of Practice. Contents

Veterinary Compounding

Keeping It Legal: Regulations and Licenses for Growing and Selling Food in Oregon

Land O Lakes Feed DDGS. Nutrients Concentrate: United States Ethanol Outlook. A Growing Opportunity

FSIS Security Guidelines for Food Processors

It s all about managing food. Food Recall Plan Template For Food Distributors

Horse Meat Production in Canada

Food Production (Dairy Food Safety Scheme) Amendment (Goat and Sheep Dairy Products) Regulation 2003

Industry Best Practices for Holding Tested Products

SALES AND USE TAX TECHNICAL BULLETINS SECTION 7 PRINTERS, NEWSPAPER OR MAGAZINE PUBLISHERS AND BOOKBINDERS

The latest updates are in blue. 11/3/00;Revised 11/8/00 1 C:\WINDOWS\Desktop\StarLink\ActionC doc

Food Defense Self-Assessment Checklist for. Slaughter and Processing Plants

The Sheep Safety and Quality Assurance Program. Melissa Garrod-VanLaningham, DVM

Feeding Flood-Damaged or Sprouted Crops to Livestock

10 GUIDANCE NOTE. Product Recall and Traceability (Revision 3) Guidance Note No. 10: Product Recall and Traceability (Revision 3)

Check that you have the correct paper. Please complete the information above. You do not need to use complete sentences for the reading assessment.

Acid, Acidified and Low-acid Foods

Sales tax must be computed on the total receipt of $

How To Control Veterinary Drug Use

Voice: Fax:

How To Control A Dog

impact analysis (PRIA); the PRIA is available at Docket No.

Manufacturing Cost Annual. California 2011 Data

Feed Mill Operations & Key Performance Indicators. Charles Stark North Carolina State University

- 1 - First Time Pharmacy Managers (Revised 02/02/2011)

HOW TO IMPORT FOREIGN SOIL and HOW TO MOVE SOIL within the UNITED STATES

Food Safety Guidance for Farmers Markets

Selenium and Selenium Yeast Use in Feed. Division of Regulatory Services University of Kentucky April 25, 2005

WORLD BANK STUDY Livestock and Slaughter Waste Management. Presentation 2 Conditions at Slaughterhouses

Subject: Lot, Batch & Serial # System Created QC/ Edited by Paul DiMarco Approval/Effective Date: 01/01/2002

Guidelines and Good Use Practices for the Use of Seed Applied Products and of Treated Seed (May 2014)

Grayson Farmers Market 2015 June 3 - October 28, 2015 Connecting Friends, Food, and Farmers

phasing out ARTIFICIAL TRANS FAT How to Comply: What Restaurants, Caterers, Mobile Food Vendors, and Others Need to Know

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT PLAN

NORTH CAROLINA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE. North Carolina State University. College of Agriculture & Life Sciences

FLORIDA HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS THAT DIFFER FROM FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS

GUIDE TO IMPLEMENTING A REGULATORY FOOD SAFETY AUDITOR SYSTEM

SECTION 6. The Codex code of practice on good animal feeding

Triangle Compounding 11/2/15

FOOD SAFETY SYSTEM CERTIFICATION FSSC 22000

Potentially Infectious Medical Waste

CORN BY-PRODUCTS IN DAIRY COW RATIONS

December 31, comments to the Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS) at the National Institutes of Health on the

SILICON VALLEY CLEAN WATER. May 2015

UDOT SPILL PREVENTION and RESPONSE PLAN for CONSTRUCTION SITES

PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM Figure 1

The U.S. Trichinella Certification Program

Texas Correlations CEV Pathway: Food Products/Processing Systems

Apple Juice Concentrate (AJC) Manual

Southern California Edison Company [SAMPLE AGREEMENT] PURCHASE ORDER EVAPORATIVE COOLER BULK PURCHASE GENERAL DESCRIPTION

11 III. Create additional market opportunities for New Hampshire producers who are not

MEAT CONTENT CALCULATION

Trade Rules of the National Hay Association U.S. FORAGE EXPORT COUNCIL

I-Track Software. A state of the art production and warehouse management system designed for Food and Beverage Manufacturers. Overview 2.

The Colorado State Patrol Commercial Vehicle Safety Units January 2011

Quality Agreement. by and between. Supplier Name. Address: and. Client Name: Address:

ALTERNATIVE ABP PROCESSES AND

General Legal Requirements A guide for pharmacists in Northern Ireland 2010 Edition. Medicines for Veterinary Use

Texas Regulations on Medical Waste

Kroger Manufacturing Trailer Seal Policy Revised 09/03/10

Austin Used Cooking Oil Initiative Voluntary Compliance Standards

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC

Independent Contractor Policy

HACCP: Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points. Dr. Angela Shaw Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition Extension and Outreach

Methods of Making Sanitation Ratings Of Milk Shippers

MARSHALL UNIVERSITY HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL SECTION

Scaling Up For Regional Markets Grading Standards and Wholesale Glossary of Terms

9.1 OBJECTIVE SCOPE REQUIRED FORMS AND REFERENCES Forms References

IACUC POLICIES, PROCEDURES, and GUIDELINES ADOPTION OF ANIMALS DESIGNATED FOR RESEARCH

TRACEABILITY IN THE FOOD SUPPLY CHAIN

TITLE II FOOD ALLERGEN LABELING AND CONSUMER PROTECTION

Guide for Preparing SHIPPING PAPERS

Investigational Drugs: Investigational Drugs and Biologics

EOC Quality Through Compliance. Policies and Procedures. HAWAII HEALTH SYSTEMS C O R P O R A T I O N Touching Lives Everyday" N/A

CHAIN OF CUSTODY GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND DEFINITIONS

Pre-Approval Process INAD vs. NADA

Self-Audit Checklist

The certification process

CODEX STANDARD FOR FOLLOW-UP FORMULA CODEX STAN This standard applies to the composition and labelling of follow-up formula.

Transcription:

GUIDE FOR FEED MANUFACTURERS TO COMPLY WITH THE FDA FINAL RULE PROHIBITING MAMMALIAN PROTEIN IN RUMINANT FEED Introduction On June 5, 1997, FDA published a final rule prohibiting the use of mammalian protein (i.e. animal protein products, such as meat and bone meal) in ruminant feeds. Mammalian protein is defined as protein from mammals, but excludes porcine (pork) and equine (horse) protein from single-species slaughter plants. There are exemptions from this prohibition for proteins derived from blood, milk, gelatin and processed meat products which have been cooked and offered for human consumption and further heat processed for feed (such as plate waste and cellulosic food casings). Fat, tallow, amino acids, and dicalcium phosphate produced as a by-product of gelatin manufacturing, are not covered by this rule and may be used in ruminant feeds. Similarly, poultry and fish meals are not included in this rule and may continue to be used. The rule took effect August 4, 1997. This means the required warning statements and written recordkeeping and cleanout procedures should have been in place on this date. FDA is allowed an additional 60 days to exhaust labeling and products from the marketplace for products and labels produced before June 5, 1997. Therefore, all products and labels were to be in compliance with this rule by October 3, 1997. This guide is designed to assist you in complying with this new rule in a timely manner. However, it is difficult to design a broad-based guide of this type for all situations and scenarios in the feed industry. Much of the guide will be devoted to discussing the end-point for complying, so a firm can design compliance procedures to reach that endpoint in a manner appropriate for its particular operations. Areas of Concern Three principal areas are detailed in this guide. These are labeling, recordkeeping, and the main point of this guide, equipment cleanout. Each of these areas has specific requirements as part of the final rule. For the purpose of this guide, it is assumed your firm manufactures feed for more than one species, and likely uses meat and bone meal or other animal protein products from mammalian sources. If your firm utilizes only animal protein products from exempt sources, such as pork or horse, no equipment cleanout is required, nor is special labeling required. However, you may wish to acquire a letter of certification, such as the one appearing in Appendix A. Source AFIA http://199.73.36.105/afia/files/bamn-%20bse-%20ddgs- %20Biosecurity%20Awareness/BSE%20Guidelines.pdf

Labeling The rule requires ail feed labeling, including brochures and other leaflets distributed with feed products containing (or likely to contain) prohibited mammalian protein, to have the statement "Do not feed to cattle or other ruminants" in a prominent place on the label or other printed material. FDA suggests the statement be distinguished by different type size or color or other means of highlighting the statement. Pet foods for retail sale and feed for non-ruminant laboratory animals are exempt from the labeling requirement. For existing Labeling, some firms may find it helpful to use a rubber stamp with the required statement, thus saving reprinting costs. Use of such a stamp should not obliterate or make unreadable other required labeling information. Similarly, printed bags may be labeled with a rubber stamp of the statement, stick-on labels, or other means of printing the statement prominently on the bag. For bulk shipments, the required statement may be stamped or otherwise printed on invoices or other shipping documents. PLEASE NOTE: The rule does not require the use of the words "Caution" or "Warning". Only the statement highlighted above is required. According to FDA, feed not bearing the required label statement are assumed to be in compliance with the rule, and the feed does not contain prohibited substances. FDA and state investigators will likely review animal protein product records of firms listing no cautionary statements on product labels. In other words, failing to use the cautionary statement implies compliance with the rule and means a firm is not using prohibited mammalian proteins. Feed produced by integrated operators for distribution to on-farm producers is not exempt from the labeling requirement unless the firm is using only exempt protein substances. This should be documented by adequate records. The Association of American Feed Control Officials (AAFCO) model feed regulations allow use of collective terms, such as "animal protein products." Nearly all states (except California and Hawaii) allow such terms in lieu of the individual ingredient name, such as, "meat and bone meal." This allowance makes it easier to utilize least-cost or best-cost formulation programs without reprinting labels each time an ingredient is changed. The final rule does not change the ability to use collective terms. Firms may continue to use "animal protein products" on feed labels, where one or more animal protein ingredients from the AAFCO list are utilized. Firms may voluntarily choose to utilize more specific ingredient names than "meat and bone meal" in ingredient listings by utilizing such specifically named ingredients like pork and bone meal. (Please note the use of a specific species name in the meat and bone name. The usual rule is to utilize the meat name, i.e. pork, beef, lamb, etc. followed by "... and bone meal.") It is unclear if feed control agencies will allow use of terms, such as "non-ruminant meat and bone meal." However, AFIA can petition such if needed. 2

Protein From Single Species Slaughter Facilities The rule allows certain exemptions from labeling and recordkeeping for firms purchasing and utilizing exempt products. For example, if your firm chooses to utilize only pork and bone meal, this ingredient must he obtained from a single-species slaughter facility. If such single species ingredients are utilized, neither recordkeeping nor the cautionary label statement is required. While not required to do so by the FDA regulations, ASIA strongly recommends that such a facility certify to the feed manufacturer that only porcine (or equine) species are slaughtered in its facility. Appendix A is an example of a certification letter (or such a statement may be included on invoices or other shipping document). Recordkeeping The rule requires records sufficient to track ingredients and finished products throughout receipt, processing and distribution for firms utilizing mammalian ingredients prohibited in ruminant feeds. These records must be available for inspection and copying by state and federal investigators, and must be maintained for one year after distribution. Normal business records may be used to document compliance with the rule during inspections by state and/or federal investigators. Most firms should have existing records sufficient to be in compliance with this rule. Any voluntary certification statements, detailed in the "Protein From Single Species Slaughter Facilities" section above and the "Ingredient Receiving" section below, should be maintained with ingredient invoices or other shipping documents. Labels of such products should be maintained as well. FDA advises that the recordkeeping requirement can be satisfied by an invoice or similar document reflecting receipt or purchase, and sale or delivery of the product. The information normally included in these documents includes: 1) Date of receipt or purchase, or sale or delivery; 2) seller's name and address; 3) consignee's name and address; 4) identification of the product, and 5) quantity. FDA notes invoices or similar sales documents may serve as labels for bulk products. Customer Recordkeeping Your customers may request information about recordkeeping required to comply with the rule, or you may wish to advise them about their recordkeeping requirements, especially dairy and beef cattle customers. AFIA offers the following suggestions for your customers: Records to document compliance with the rule for customers feeding ruminants must be available for FDA or state inspection and maintained for one year. Such records are similar to those described above for feed manufacturers and include the labeling for all feed products containing animal protein products. If a customer further mixes feeds for use at other facilities, these feeds must be labeled with the required cautionary statement if the feeds contain prohibited animal protein products. 3

Facilities and Equipment Cleanout For facilities which choose to separate mammalian and non-mammalian materials, FDA suggests that all equipment which comes in contact with feeds containing mammalian and nonmammalian product follow all reasonable and effective procedures to prevent contamination of manufactured feed. The agency notes that only equipment and storage facilities that are used for proteins derived from both mammalian and nonmammalian tissues are subject to the clean-out requirement. FDA will consider the use of clean-out procedures to be adequate for the purposes of this final rule if the procedures are based on the equipment clean-out procedures in 21 CFR 225.65 (CGMPs for medicated feed manufacturers). Federally licensed, medicated feed mills are required to comply with these CGMP requirements, including having predetermined, written compliance procedures for each facility. Many feed manufacturers that do not hold a feed mill license (formerly MFAs or 1900s) may not have written procedures. These firms also must have written procedures to prevent unsafe carryover of prohibited mammalian protein into either ruminant feeds and/or ingredients used in ruminant feeds. These procedures may include physical cleanout, flushing, or sequencing. Ingredient Receiving In most instances, sequencing of received ingredients will enhance- operating efficiencies. For example, after unloading rendered mammalian protein, the area around the receiving pit should be swept, and the conveying system operated until it is completely cleaned out. Next, depending upon the operating capacity of the receiving system, an adequate amount of a high volume, routinely received ingredient, such as soybean meal, should be received to clean the receiving pit and conveying equipment of rendered mammalian protein residue. Ideally, this material should be directed to a second soybean meal bin, for example, and not used in ruminant feeds. In cases where the preferred sequence of ingredients cannot occur, then flushing is an option. In such a case, an adequate amount of soybean meal should be transferred to a bulk load out bin, loaded onto a truck, received to clean the receiving pit and conveying system, and directed to the soybean meal bin designated for non-ruminant use. The amount of sequenced or flushed material deemed adequate to clean the receiving system of rendered protein residue should he decided by someone knowledgeable in plant operations and/or FDA compliance. If inspected, FDA investigators will review your written procedures for receiving rendered protein, verify your plant personnel are following the procedures, and make an assessment as to whether the amount of material used for sequencing and/or flushing is adequate to prevent carryover of rendered protein. In order to document cleanout and minimize carryover from ingredient suppliers and carriers, each firm may request from ingredient haulers certification (Appendix B) that transport vehicles have been flushed with non-prohibited ingredients and/or sequenced in a manner adequate to prevent carryover or prohibited substances. Although certificates are not required by FDA, AFIA strongly recommends this approach. 4

Processing Similar to CGMPs for medicated feed, the manufacture of feed formulated with mammalian protein can be properly sequenced. For example, prior to the production of ruminant feed, a non-ruminant feed, not formulated with mammalian protein, can be produced after feed containing mammalian protein. In most cases, this sequence should continue through each process in the plant, up to and including bulk load-out: and packaging, to prevent unsafe carryover of feed containing mammalian protein into any ruminant feeds. In cases where feed sequencing is not practical, then flushing is an option. In such a case, prior to ruminant feed production, an adequate amount of flush material, such as a high-volume ingredient like soybean meal, should be transferred through the plant processes to remove residues of feed containing mammalian protein. Typically, this amount will range between 200 pounds and 1,000 pounds, depending -upon the size of the operating systems. This flush material can be sacked or held in a bulk tote, must be properly identified as "mammalian protein flush", and can be reused into feed production containing mammalian protein by replacing the same ingredient pound for pound. The amount of flush material deemed adequate to clean the mixing and other plant systems of residue from feed containing rendered protein should be determined by someone knowledgeable in plant operations and/or FDA compliance. If inspected, FDA investigators will review your written procedures for production of rendered protein feeds, verify your plant personnel are following the procedures, and make an assessment as to whether the amount of material used for flushing is adequate to prevent unsafe carryover of feed containing rendered protein. Remember, written procedures must be developed for each site. Moreover, any procedures developed must be used consistently in the facility for which the procedures were developed. Summary In order to comply with this rule, feed manufacturers choosing to utilize nonmammalian and mammalian protein ingredients in she same facility must do the following: Label all products containing or which nay contain prohibited mammalian protein with the required warning statement. Maintain adequate records for one year to document compliance with the FDA rule on mammalian protein. Develop, maintain and utilize written procedures adequate to prevent the carryover of prohibited mammalian ingredients into ruminant feed. Allow state and/or federal investigators access to records and procedures concerning the rule. Feed manufacturers choosing to utilize non-prohibited mammalian proteins are not required to label products with the cautionary statement. However, they should maintain records sufficient to document compliance with the rule, including any certification statement from suppliers. Questions on compliance with this rule may be addressed to either Brian Bursiek or Richard Sellers at AFIA. 5

Appendix A Letter Certifying Pure Porcine/Equine Protein Product Compliance I/We certify that our product sold to at the following location contains only porcine/equine protein product and is therefore an exempt mammalian protein under FDA regulation 21 CFR 4 589.2000. I/We certify this product was produced at a single-species slaughter facility. I/we further certify that this letter will cover all future shipments until I/We provide written notification that this letter is no longer in effect. Name Signature Title Address Firm City/State/ZIP Phone Number _ Date 6

Appendix B Letter Requesting Adequate Cleanout of Conveyance Vehicles In Compliance with FDA Regulation 21 CFR 589.2000 This is to notify you that (Firm Name) requires your firm (shipper's name) to be in compliance with FDA regulation 2] CFR 589.2000 cleanout procedures. Your cleanout procedures should be adequate to prevent any carryover of mammalian protein products from one load to the next. Such procedures may be by flushing, physical cleanout or by sequencing your loads. You must provide this firm with written concurrence of this request. If there are any questions about this request, please contact the person in the office listed below. Name Signature Title Address Firm City/State/ZIP Phone Number _ 7

I/We concur with this request and certify our/my firm is in compliance with the stated rule and adequately clean out my/our vehicles after transportation of mammalian protein products. I/We further certify that this letter will cover all future shipments until I/we provide written notification that this letter is no longer in effect. Name Signature Title Address Firm City/State/ZIP Phone Number _ Date 8