TENNESSEE REGULATORY AUTHORITY



Similar documents
RECEIVED ETE SEP I ZfM SEP I I p n: 35. Arizona Corporation Commission TO:

OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

August 23, Critical Air Medicine, Inc. Corporate Headquarters Attn: Sagi Kfir, Esq. General Counsel 4141 Kearny Villa Road San Diego, CA 92123

RULES OF TENNESSEE REGULATORY AUTHORITY CHAPTER REGULATIONS FOR LOCAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS PROVIDERS TABLE OF CONTENTS

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # WARNING

LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH COMMISSION PDF VERSION

RULES OF TENNESSEE REGULATORY AUTHORITY CHAPTER TELEPHONE SOLICITATION REGULATIONS - DO NOT CALL REGISTER

Control Number : Item Number : 11. Addendum StartPage : 0

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING #07-35 WARNING

Small and Minority Business Participation Plans

VoIP Enhanced 911 and Enhanced Wireless 911 Service

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:

June 4, Request for Private Letter Ruling COMPANY. Dear Xxxx:

Section 314: TELECOMMUNICATION AND RELATED SERVICES SOURCING RULE A. Except for the defined telecommunication services in subsection (C), the sale of

Definitions for KRS , , , and As used in KRS , , , and : (1) "Ancillary services"

IC Chapter Certificates of Territorial Authority for Communications Service Providers

TITLE 62 TELEPHONE CORPORATION RULES IDAPA

ADWA. Securities Exchange Act 5 15(a) November 23,2004 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS

RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION CHAPTER UNINSURED EMPLOYERS FUND

d.b.a. North State Communications First Revised Page 1 Canceling Original Page 1 INFORMATIONAL TARIFF INTERSTATE OPERATOR SERVICES

Application No. C-2397 PAGE 2

S T A T E O F T E N N E S S E E OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL PO BOX NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE April 16, Opinion No.

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 14-05

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS

Secretary of the Senate. Chief Clerk of the Assembly. Private Secretary of the Governor

Telecommunication Services

MCIMETRO ACCESS TRANSMISSION SERVICES LLC

(1) The term automatic telephone dialing system means equipment which has the capacity

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission th St., S.W. Washington, D.C

CITY OF ROCKFORD Electricity Aggregation Program. Plan of Operation and Governance

UTILITIES DIVISION ANNUAL REPORT, CALENDAR YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2014

NC General Statutes - Chapter 7A Article 16 1

Case KG Doc 373 Filed 11/20/15 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Chapter 11

TITLE 777. STATEWIDE VIRTUAL CHARTER SCHOOL BOARD CHAPTER 10. STATEWIDE VIRTUAL CHARTER SCHOOLS

GENERAL TARIFF CRTC 21461

Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC Docket No. RP

STATEMENT OF NATURE, REASONS AND BASIS

RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS COMPLIANCE DIVISION

The Illinois Teacher Preparation Program (1)

ORAL ARGUMENT IN CASE NO SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 21, Case Nos and

OCTOBER 23, Sincerely,

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. Board of Public Utilities 44 South Clinton Avenue, 9th Floor PO Box 350 Trenton, NJ

FINAL ORDER EFFECTIVE:

Alternative regulation process for small telephone utilities -- Findings -- Definitions -- Procedures -- Withdrawal. (1) The legislature

Minnesota Public Utilities Commission Staff Briefing Papers

Kansas Statutes - Insurance Laws CHAPTER 40-- INSURANCE Article RISK RETENTION AND PURCHASING GROUPS

UTILITY BILL PAYMENT BY CREDIT OR DEBIT CARD REPORT PURSUANT TO ACT 47 OF THE LEGISLATIVE SESSION

CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL Chapter 72, Laws of th Legislature 2015 Regular Session

TELECOM REPORT LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL L. GLASER, L.L.C. TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND NEW TECHNOLOGIES TELECOM REPORT

BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. CARDIF LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY ) ) By ) ) FINANCIAL AMERICAN HOLDINGS CORPORATION ) ORDER

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *

Reg. IV.18.(i). Special Rules: Telecommunications and ancillary service providers. [Adopted July 31, 2008]

Certificate of convenience and necessity.

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # WARNING

Notification of the Indirect Transfer of Control of DeltaCom, Inc., Interstate FiberNet, Inc., and Business Telecom, Inc. to EarthLink, Inc.

MAY FILED. Department of Insurance State of Idaho. Attorneys for the Department ofinsurance , Idaho Certificate ofauthority No.

BRIEF OF APPELLANT, CITY OF PORT GIBSON, MS

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # WARNING

Welcome to FLCLASS. Thank you for choosing FLCLASS! Sincerely, The FLCLASS Board of Trustees New Broad Street Orlando, FL 32814

RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MORRIS COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY

Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 10/25/2012 4:45:16 PM J

Distributed Antenna Systems in Higher Education

Transcription:

TENNESSEE REGULATORY AUTHORITY 502 Deaderick Street, 4`h Floor Nashville, Tennessee 37243 July 22, 2015 Catherine Wang Brett P. Ferenchak Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 2020 K. Street, NW Washington, District of Columbia 20006-1806 In Re: Docket No. 13-00117, Notice of Name Change from Crown Castle NG Central, Inc. to Crown Castle NG Central, LLC Dear Ms. Wang and Mr. Ferenchak: This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your notification that Crown Castle NG Central, Inc. intends to change its name to Crown Castle NG Central, LLC. The notification meets the requirements contained in TRA Rule 1220-4-1-.08 and the TRA will update its records to reflect the new company name. No further action is required on your behalf and the TRA will close this docket. Sincerely, David Foster, Chief Utilities Division C: Docket File Telephone 615.741.2904, Toll-Free 1.800.342.8359, Facsimile 615.741.5015 www.tn.gov/tra www.facebook.com/tntra

BEFORE THE TENNESSEE REGULATORY AUTHORITY NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE November 12, 2013 INRE: APPLICATION OF CROWN CASTLE NG CENTRAL, INC. FOR AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE COMPETING LOCAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES ) ) ) DOCKETNO. ) 13-00117 ) INITIAL ORDER GRANTING CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY This matter came before the Hearing Officer of the Tennessee Regulatory Authority (the "Authority" or "TRA") at a Hearing held on November 12, 2013 to consider the Application for Certificate to Provide Competing Local Telecommunications Services (the "Application") filed by Crown Castle NG Central, Inc. ("Crown Castle" or "Applicant"), on August 30, 2013. In its Application, Crown Castle seeks a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity ("CCN") for authority to provide competing local telecommunications services in Tennessee. LEGAL STANDARD Crown Castle's Application was made pursuant to and considered in light of the criteria for granting a CCN as set forth in Tenn. Code Ann. 65-4-201 (Supp. 2013), which provides, in pertinent part: (a) No public utility shall establish or begin the construction of, or operate any line, plant, or system, or route in or into a municipality or other territory already receiving a like service from another public utility, or establish service therein, without first having obtained from the authority, after written application and hearing, a certificate that the present or future public convenience and necessity require or will require such construction, establishment, and operation, and no person or corporation not at the time a public utility shall commence the construction of any plant, line, system or route to be operated as a public utility, or the operation of which would constitute the same, or the owner or operator

thereof, a public utility as defined by law, without having first obtained, in like manner, a similar certificate... * * * ( c) After notice to the incumbent local exchange telephone company and other interested parties and following a hearing, the authority shall grant a certificate of convenience and necessity to a competing telecommunications service provider if after examining the evidence presented, the authority finds: (1) The applicant has demonstrated that it will adhere to all applicable commission policies, rules and orders; and (2) The applicant possesses sufficient managerial, financial, and technical abilities to provide the applied for services. * * * Furthermore, pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. 65-5-112 (2004), a competing telecommunications provider is required to file with the Authority (1) a plan containing the provider's plan for purchasing goods and services from small and minority-owned telecommunications businesses; and (2) information on programs that might provide technical assistance to such businesses. HEARING ON THE MERITS Pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. 65-4-201, et seq., public notice of the Hearing in this matter was issued by the Hearing Officer on October 22, 2013. No persons sought intervention prior to or during the Hearing. Mr. Robert Millar, Associate General Counsel of Crown Castle, appeared personally during the Hearing, ratified his sworn pre-filed testimony that had been filed in the docket file with the Application, and was subject to examination by the Hearing Officer. I. CROWN CASTLE'S QUALIFICATIONS 1. Originally formed as "NextG Networks of Illinois, Inc." under the laws of the state of Delaware on October 4, 2002, Crown Castle filed a Certificate of Amendment to change its 2

name to "Crown Castle NG Central, Inc." on May 3, 2012. Crown Castle was licensed by the Secretary of State to transact business in Tennessee on December 13, 2012. 2. The registered agent for Crown Castle is CT Corporation System located at 800 S Gay Street, Suite 2021, Knoxville, Tennessee 37929. The corporate offices of Crown Castle are located at 2000 Corporate Drive, Canonsburg, Pennsylvania 15317. Crown Castle may be reached at telephone number (724) 416-2000. 3. The Application and information in the record demonstrate that Crown Castle has the requisite technical and managerial ability to provide the services for which it has applied within the State of Tennessee. Specifically, Crown Castle's senior management team possesses extensive business, technical, operational and regulatory experience. 4. Crown Castle has also demonstrated that it has the necessary capital and financial ability to provide the services it proposes to offer. 5. Crown Castle has represented that it will adhere to all applicable statutes, policies, rules and orders of the Authority. II. PROPOSED SERVICES Crown Castle intends to provide facilities-based local transport services to customers throughout the state of Tennessee, and proposes to provide these services through a combination of its own facilities and facilities that it will lease from a variety of telecommunication carriers. Crown Castle's services will be both jurisdictionally intrastate and interstate, and will typically rely on a technical platform known as "Distributed Antenna System" or "DAS." Crown Castle's "RF" transport services will use fiber optic technology, including multi-wavelength optical technology over dedicated transport facilities, to provide telecommunication companies with transport options. RF transport services connect wireless capacity equipment (i.e. antennas) to 3

bi-directional, RF-to-optical conversion equipment at a hub facility. The hub facility can be provided by the customer or by Crown Castle. The conversion equipment allows Crown Castle to accept RF traffic from the customer and then send bi-directional traffic transmissions across the appropriate optical networks. At the remote end, Crown Castle or the customer company will provide RF-to-optical conversion equipment to allow bi-directional conversion between optical signals and RF signals. RF signals can be received and radiated at this remote node by the customer company. The services offered by Crown Castle are customized to the transport and backhaul needs of individual customers. Tariff rates will be available for all non-custom services. Crown Castle does not intend to furnish switchboard residential or business telephone service. Furthermore, because Crown Castle is a transport provider, it does not intend to provide access dial tone voice service for either residential or business customers. III. PERMITTING COMPETITION TO SERVE THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY Crown Castle's Application and its proposed services have been found to foster the goals of the Tennessee General Assembly and determined to likely to benefit the present and future public convenience by increasing competition in the telecommunications services markets in the State and fostering the development of an efficient, technologically advanced statewide system of telecommunications services. IV. SMALL AND MINORITY-OWNED TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN AND BUSINESS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM Crown Castle has filed a satisfactory small and minority-owned telecommunications business participation plan, pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. 65-5-112 (2004) and the Authority's Rules. 4

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The Application for Authority to Provide Competing Local Exchange Service filed by Crown Castle NG Central, Inc., is approved. 2. Any party aggrieved by the Hearing Officer's decision in this matter may file a petition for reconsideration within fifteen days from the date of this Order. 3. This Initial Order shall become a Final Order of the Tennessee Regulatory Authority, unless a petition requesting reconsideration or an appeal of this Order is filed prior to the expiration of the fifteen-day period noted above. 5