DISCOVERY MOTIONS AND THE DISCOVERY FACILITATOR PROGRAM.



Similar documents
Case4:12-cv KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CIVIL MEDIATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS PART FIVE - LAW DIVISION AMENDED COURT RULES

: : before this court (the Court Annexed Mediation Program ); and

COMBUSTION ENGINEERING 524(g) ASBESTOS PI TRUST ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) PROCEDURES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA.

SUMMARY OF CHANGES COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION RULES

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 3 CIVIL RULES

(2) For production of public records or hospital medical records. Where the subpoena commands any custodian of public records or any custodian of hosp

RULE 1. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 7 FAMILY LAW

CONSTRUCTION DISPUTE RESOLUTION - A COMPARISON OF RULES AND FEES FROM U.S. ARBITRATION ORGANIZATIONS

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER 14-23

Representing Yourself In Employment Arbitration: An Employee s Guide

Family Law Discovery Issues

Accounting and Related Services Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures

Exhibit A PROCEDURES OF THE SUPERIOR COURTS OF THE CONASAUGA JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF GEORGIA FOR ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

PERSONAL INJURY COURTS (DEPTS. 91, 92, 93 AND 97) FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

If you have been sued as a defendant in a civil case...keep reading.

How To File A Family Law Case In California

Getting a Trial Date in Cowlitz County

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE

When should these forms be used?

JAMS Dispute Resolution Rules for Surety Bond Disputes

Counsel must be fully familiar with the Uniform Civil Rules for the Supreme Court 22 NYCRR Part 202.

SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY PROBATE DIVISION

A Brief Overview of ediscovery in California

Bylaws of the Lawyer-Client Fee Dispute Resolution Committee of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association. Enacted November 18, 2015

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 3 CIVIL RULES

HAWAI`I REVISED STATUTES CHAPTER 672B DESIGN CLAIM CONCILIATION PANEL. Act 207, 2007 Session Laws of Hawai`i

The Divorce Process. What to Expect. Cassandra P. Hicks

INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARING CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CHAPTER FIVE. 5.1 APPLICABILITY OF RULES; SANCTIONS (a) Applicability of Rules (b) Sanctions

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA FAMILY RULES

Any civil action exempt from arbitration by action of a presiding judge under ORS

PART III Discovery. Overview of the Discovery Process CHAPTER 8 KEY POINTS THE NATURE OF DISCOVERY. Information is obtainable by one or more discovery

Family Law: Limited Scope Representation (adopt forms FL-950 and FL-955, and Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.170)

CHAPTER 7 UNIFORM COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE RULES

Filing a Motion for Change of Venue in a Family Law Case

rdd Doc 402 Filed 10/25/13 Entered 10/25/13 16:17:31 Main Document Pg 1 of 10. (Jointly Administered)

This Case Management Order has been: ed to: Hand Delivered to: Mailed to: Date: Judicial Assistant/Deputy Clerk:

Compulsory Arbitration

How to Subpoena Witnesses and Documents

JUSTICE LINDA S. JAMIESON COMMERCIAL DIVISION RULES

) ) NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority vested in me as Chief Judge of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, it is

2013 Amendments to Local Rules and Invitation to Comment

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PASCO AND PINELLAS COUNTIES, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO PA/PI-CIR

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING A SMALL CLAIMS CASE

Read the attached order carefully. It applies to you and you will be responsible for complying with the order.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON C STATE OF GEORGIA. AMENDED ORDER Il\1PLElVIENTING ELECTRONIC-FILING FOR CIVIL CASES

The Enforceability of Mediated Settlement Agreements. By: Thomas J. Smith The Law Offices of Thomas J. Smith San Antonio, Texas

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CHAPTER FIVE FAMILY DIVISION RULES...122

Model Code of Conduct for Judicial Employees in the State of Nevada

What to Expect In Your Lawsuit

RULES OF THE TAX APPEAL COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

The Judges of the Fulton Superior Court hereby create a "Business Case Division" (hereinafter referred to as the "Division").

In recent years, energy industry users have increasingly voiced the complaint

SMALL CLAIMS RULES. (d) Record of Proceedings. A record shall be made of all small claims court proceedings.

PROCEDURES FOR THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND INSURANCE MEDIATION PROGRAM FOR INSURANCE CLAIMS FOLLOWING STORM SANDY

NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE AND OSCEOLA COUNTIES, FLORIDA

Information for pro se litigants navigating the divorce process in King County Superior Court

RULE 10 FUNDS HELD BY THE CLERK

TRONOX TORT CLAIMS TRUST. Individual Review and Arbitration Procedures for Category A and Category D Personal Injury Claims

Superior Court of California County of Orange Family Law Case Management Plan

HOW TO RESCHEDULE A HEARING OR TRIAL: MOTION TO CONTINUE

DIVISION V FAMILY LAW CHAPTER 1 GENERAL

PETITION TO ARBITRATE A FEE DISPUTE (Client Attorney Petition)

WHEREAS, to promote the stability of families going through a divorce or in paternity actions; and

DIVISION V FAMILY LAW PREFACE GENERAL

Friday 31st October, 2008.

POST-DECREE OR POST-FINAL ORDERS

RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE. August 20, 2015

Singapore International Commercial Court Practice Directions (Amendment No. 1 of 2016) Part X: Originating Processes and Documents

MOHAVE COUNTY JUSTICE COURT. If you want to file a SMALL CLAIMS ANSWER

PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF NEVADA. LCB File No. R October 10, 2000

Discussion. Discussion

CIVIL TRIAL RULES. of the COURTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, TEXAS. Table of Contents GENERAL MATTERS. Rule 1.10 Time Standards for the Disposition of Cases...

JAMS Comprehensive Arbitration Rules & Procedures

UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW (UNCITRAL) UNCITRAL Conciliation Rules

ATTACHMENT A TO PLAN EXHIBIT B THE BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES

WORKERS COMPENSATION PARALEGAL

Schedule of Forms SCHEDULE OF FORMS 3. Nil

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT, PREBLE COUNTY, OHIO

991. Creation of division of administrative law Applicability; exemptions; attorney fees; court costs

ASARCO ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES

INDIANA FALSE CLAIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT. IC Chapter 5.5. False Claims and Whistleblower Protection

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DIVISION

Appendix F-7: PA Custody Mediation Rules

MEDIATION PROCEDURES FOR RESOLVING BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS DISPUTES

TABLE OF CONTENTS Arbitration of Extended Warranty Contracts

MONTGOMERY COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT FAMILY DIVISION

SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY EMERGENCY STORAGE PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENT. Appendix B

ATTORNEY-CLIENT CONTRACT. The Firm has agreed to represent you in a case involving.

51ST LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, 2013

LIMITED SCOPE REPRESENTATION

JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE AND OSCEOLA COUNTIES, FLORIDA

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 7 FAMILY LAW

Denver Bar Association. Certificate and Affidavit of Completion of Mentoring Program

Transcription:

DISCOVERY MOTIONS AND THE DISCOVERY FACILITATOR PROGRAM. 1.0 Mandatory Referral to Discovery Facilitator Program 1.1 Any party wishing to file a discovery motion must first serve a Request for Assignment of Discovery Facilitator by fax or email on The ADR office of the Contra Costa County Superior Court ( ADR Office ), Fax No. 925-646-2910; email: email: ADRdiscoveryfacilitator@contracosta.courts.ca.gov A copy of the Request for Assignment of Discovery Facilitator shall also be served on all parties to the action. The Request for Assignment of Discovery Facilitator shall provide the name and the fax number and e-mail address of the party who intends to file the discovery motion, of all other parties against whom the motion will be filed, and of all other parties in the action. 1.2 The Request for Assignment of Discovery Facilitator must be served on or before the last date for filing the discovery motion. Service of the Request for Assignment of Discovery Facilitator shall be deemed the proper filing of a discovery motion for purposes of the rule requiring that discovery motions must be filed within 45 days of service of the discovery responses. 2.0 Discovery Facilitators. 2.1 The ADR Office shall maintain a list of Discovery Facilitators. Cases shall be assigned to Discovery Facilitators in the order in which they appear on the list. 2.2 Before notifying the parties of the assignment of a Discovery Facilitator, the ADR Office shall contact the proposed Discovery Facilitator to confirm availability and willingness to serve. 2.3 Within 3 calendar days of being contacted, the proposed Discovery Facilitator shall perform a conflict of interest check. A Discovery Facilitator shall decline the assignment if he or she knows of facts that would serve as grounds for disqualification under CCP 170.1 if the Discovery Facilitator were a Judicial Officer. The Discovery Facilitator shall also inform the ADR Office of any disclosures he or she deems appropriate to be forwarded to the parties. 2.4 Discovery Facilitators shall have the following minimum requirements: 10 years of experience in Civil Litigation. 3.0 Assignment of Discovery Facilitator. 3.1 The ADR Office shall serve a Notice of Assignment of Discovery Facilitator within 10 calendar days of receipt of a Request for Assignment of Discovery Facilitator. 3.2 Rejection of Assigned Discovery Facilitator.

3.2.1 The party who filed the Request for Assignment of Discovery Facilitator shall have 5 court days after service of Notice of Assignment to serve on the ADR Office and the parties in the action a Rejection of Assigned Discovery Facilitator. 3.2.2 If the party who filed the Request for Assignment of Discovery Facilitator does not file a Rejection of Assigned Discovery Facilitator, the party against whom the discovery motion is filed shall have 5 additional court days to serve a Rejection of Assigned Discovery Facilitator. If no Rejection of Assigned Discovery Facilitator is served within 10 court days of service of the original Notice of Assignment of Discovery Facilitator, the Notice of Assignment of Discovery Facilitator is confirmed. 3.2.3 If the first Discovery Facilitator declines to serve or if either party serves a Rejection of the first Discovery Facilitator who is assigned, the ADR Office shall serve a Notice of Assignment of Second Discovery Facilitator within 5 calendar days of receipt of a Rejection of the first Discovery Facilitator. The party who has not yet served a Rejection may, within 5 court days of service of the Notice of Assignment of Second Discovery Facilitator, serve a Rejection of the second Discovery Facilitator who is assigned. If that party does serve a challenge, then the ADR Office shall serve a Notice of Assignment of Third Discovery Facilitator, who shall be confirmed upon service of the notice. If the party who still has a right to reject the Second Discovery Facilitator fails to exercise it on time, the Second Discovery Facilitator is confirmed 5 court days after notice of his or her assignment was served. 4.0 Hearing of Discovery Dispute. 4.1 The Discovery Facilitator shall hold a hearing on the discovery dispute no later than 30 days after confirmation of the assignment of the Discovery Facilitator. 4.2 One of the purposes of this Discovery Facilitator program is to narrow the number of discovery disputes, should a hearing ever be required before a judicial officer. Another purpose is to allow for informal resolution of discovery disputes at a lower cost to the parties than they would otherwise incur. Therefore, the format of briefing done for a hearing before a Discovery Facilitator should be brief, practical, and informal. Within these guidelines, the Discovery Facilitator has the discretion to determine the format of briefing required or whether any briefing will be required, and the schedule for service of such briefing. The Discovery Facilitator shall also have discretion to determine the structure of the hearing. 4.3 If the Discovery Facilitator determines that the hearing cannot be scheduled or completed within 30 days of the date of confirmation of the assignment of the

Discovery Facilitator because of conduct of one of the parties, the Discovery Facilitator shall issue a Finding of Non-Compliance, specifying the party and/ or attorney responsible. In the event a formal discovery motion is subsequently filed, the moving party shall attach a copy of the Finding of Noncompliance to its papers as an exhibit and may submit a brief, factual, non- argumentative recitation of the facts regarding the non-compliance. The policy of the court will be to award monetary sanctions against the party responsible for the Discovery Facilitator's inability to schedule or complete the hearing within 30 days, regardless of the outcome on the merits of the motion. In the case of represented parties, the monetary sanction shall be assessed against the attorney and/or the party. 4.4 The Discovery Facilitator program is not a mediation program. The Discovery Facilitators are not mediators and the proceedings under this Program are not subject to mediation confidentiality rules. While the Facilitator may encourage compromises in discussion at the hearing in order to narrow or settle disputes, Discovery Facilitators should not simply try to produce a compromise at any cost. In making his or her recommendations, the Discovery Facilitator will give an opinion on the merits of the dispute in a manner that he or she believes is consistent with applicable law. 4.5 If the discovery dispute is completely resolved at or before the hearing, the parties will confirm the terms of the resolution in writing, and the appointment of the Discovery Facilitator will terminate automatically, unless the Discovery Facilitator and the parties agree that the Facilitator will continue to serve. 4.6 If the discovery dispute is not completely resolved at the hearing, the Discovery Facilitator shall, within 10 days of the completion of the hearing, serve a document on the parties entitled Recommendations of Discovery Facilitator and Termination of Appointment of Discovery Facilitator. The Discovery Facilitator may require the substantially prevailing party to do the initial draft of the recommendations. If so, this initial draft shall not be required to be sent to the opposing party for approval as to form, but rather will be sent directly to the Discovery Facilitator. 4.7 If service of the Recommendations of Discovery Facilitator and Termination of Appointment of Discovery Facilitator does not resolve the dispute, the moving party shall have 30 days from the service of the Recommendations of Discovery Facilitator and Termination of Appointment of Discovery Facilitator to file with the clerk of the court and serve on the parties formal discovery motion papers. Those moving papers shall include a declaration that the parties have completed the Discovery Facilitator Program and shall attach the Recommendations of Discovery Facilitator as an exhibit. 4.8 If for any reason the Discovery Facilitator fails to serve the Recommendations of Discovery Facilitator and Termination of Appointment of Discovery Facilitator, the moving party shall have 40 days from the completion of the discovery hearing to file formal discovery motion papers regarding the discovery dispute, which papers shall include a declaration regarding the failure of the Facilitator

to serve the Notice. 4.9 The court will consider the Recommendations of the Discovery Facilitator in deciding the merits of the motion. The purpose of this Discovery Facilitator program is to facilitate discovery and the resolution of discovery disputes without, or with minimal, court supervision, given current budgetary restraints on the court. The policy of the court will be to award monetary sanctions in favor of any party who substantially prevails on a discovery motion that is subject to the Discovery Facilitator program. 5.0 Urgent discovery motions. 5.1 A party may present an ex parte application to shorten all time frames set forth in this Rule upon a showing of good cause. 6.0 Compensation of Discovery Facilitators. 6.1 Recognizing the importance of the principle of maintaining access to justice, and the fact that there is only a nominal fee for filing a discovery motion to be heard before a judicial officer, Discovery Facilitators shall serve without any monetary compensation. The parties to the discovery dispute are counseled to bear in mind that the Discovery Facilitators are donating their time, to grant them the courtesy and respect that they would grant to a judicial officer, and to minimize the paperwork that they serve on the Discovery Facilitators. 6.2 If the parties choose to use the services of the Discovery Facilitator after completion of the assignment, compensation shall be pursuant to agreement of the Facilitator and the parties, which agreement should be confirmed in writing.

REQUEST FOR ASSIGNMENT OF DISCOVERY FACILITATOR Plaintiff/defendant hereby requests assignment of a Discovery Facilitator. Plaintiff/defendant intends to file a motion regarding the following type(s) of discovery: Form interrogatories Special Interrogatories Requests for Admissions Inspection Demands Deposition Questions Subpoenas Duces Tecum Medical or Mental Health Examinations For issue or evidentiary sanctions Other (describe) _ The deadline for filing the motion is. The party(ies) against whom this motion will be brought are A service list for this motion is attached or is as follows (set forth each attorney s or selfrepresented party s name, fax and email, and party represented): Attorney for Plaintiff/Defendant

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF DISCOVERY FACILITATOR TO THE PARTIES INVOLVED IN THE DISCOVERY DISPUTE: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT has been assigned as Discovery Facilitator in this matter. All notices to be served on shall be faxed or emailed to the following: Fax number: Email _

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF SECOND DISCOVERY FACILITATOR AFTER FIRST REJECTION TO THE PARTIES INVOLVED IN THE DISCOVERY DISPUTE: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT, one rejection having been served, has been assigned as Discovery Facilitator in this matter. All notices to be served on shall be faxed or emailed to the following: Fax number: Email _

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF THIRD DISCOVERY FACILITATOR AFTER SECOND REJECTION TO THE PARTIES INVOLVED IN THE DISCOVERY DISPUTE: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT, two rejections having been served, has been assigned as Discovery Facilitator in this matter and this Notice of Assignment is automatically confirmed as of the date set forth below. All notices to be served on shall be faxed or emailed to the following: Fax number: Email _

FINDING OF NON-COMPLIANCE I, the assigned Discovery Facilitator in this matter, hereby find that I was unable to schedule complete a hearing on the discovery dispute in this matter because of the non-compliance of (set forth name of responsible attorney or party in pro per.)

NOTICE OF TERMINATION OF APPOINTMENT OF DISCOVERY FACILITATOR TO THE PARTIES PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that as of the date set forth below my assignment as Discovery Facilitator has terminated.

RECOMMENDATIONS OF DISCOVERY FACILITATOR AND TERMINATION OF APPOINTMENT OF DISCOVERY FACILITATOR I, the undersigned, served as Discovery Facilitator in this matter. My appointment is terminated as of the date set forth below. The parties are hereby advised that they have 30 days from the date set forth below to file a formal discovery motion regarding this matter. The matters that remain in dispute and my recommendations as to how they should be resolved are as follows (See attachment): Discovery Facilitator

REJECTION OF ASSIGNED DISCOVERY FACILITATOR I,, attorney for, the moving/responding party, hereby reject as Discovery Facilitator.