How To Make A High Calorific Gas From A Biomass Gasifier

Similar documents
Assignment 8: Comparison of gasification, pyrolysis and combustion

Module 5: Combustion Technology. Lecture 33: Combustion air calculation

Concepts in Syngas Manufacture

Module 5: Combustion Technology. Lecture 34: Calculation of calorific value of fuels

CONTENTS. ZVU Engineering a.s., Member of ZVU Group, WASTE HEAT BOILERS Page 2

Coal-To-Gas & Coal-To-Liquids

Lecture 35: Atmosphere in Furnaces

NITROGEN OXIDES FORMATION in combustion processes COMBUSTION AND FUELS

Biomass Syngas Production Technology by Gasification for Liquid Fuel and Other Chemicals

Torrefaction: technology overview and development status

Gasification, Producer Gas and Syngas

BIOMASS RESEARCH at ECN. Bram van der Drift

Yu. F. Vasyuchkov*, M. Yu. Bykova* NEW TECHNOLOGY OF GAS EXTRACTION ON THE BASE OF A COAL TO A HYDROGEN TRANSFER

COMBUSTION. In order to operate a heat engine we need a hot source together with a cold sink

Process Technology. Advanced bioethanol production and renewable energy generation from ligno-cellulosic materials, biomass waste and residues

How To Gasify Wood And Agriculture Biomass

Fischer-Tropsch Diesel from Solid Biomass

CFD Simulation of Biofuel and Coal Co-Combustion in a Pulverized Coal Fired Furnace

IB Chemistry. DP Chemistry Review

Performance of the Boiler and To Improving the Boiler Efficiency Using Cfd Modeling

COKE PRODUCTION FOR BLAST FURNACE IRONMAKING

VALIDATION, MODELING, AND SCALE-UP OF CHEMICAL LOOPING COMBUSTION WITH OXYGEN UNCOUPLING

Bio-oil for the Future

C H A P T E R 3 FUELS AND COMBUSTION

Tutkimuksen merkitys menestyvässä liiketoiminnassa- Innovaatiosta tuotteeksi

MODERN TECHNOLOGIES FOR ENERGY AND MATERIAL RECOVERY FROM WASTE. Tomáš Rohal, Business Development CEEI 10-Oct-2013

Siemens Fuel Gasification Technology at a Glance

Calculate Available Heat for Natural Gas Fuel For Industrial Heating Equipment and Boilers

Simulation of Coal Gasification Process using ASPEN PLUS

SIX REASONS TO DRY BIOGAS To A LOW DEWPOINT BEFORE COMBUSTION IN A CHP ENGINE STEVEN SCOTT MARKET DEVELOPMENT MANAGER ALTERNATIVE ENERGIES

THE OPTIMISATION OF BIOMASS COMBUSTION IN SMALL BOILERS

Greenhouse gas emissions from direct combustion of various fuels (e.g. grain dryer)

B0401 Abstract 029 Oral Presentation Session B04 Innovative Applications and Designs - Tuesday, July 1, :00 h

Development of Coal Gasification System for Producing Chemical Synthesis Source Gas

Poultry Litter as Renewable Energy Resource Using SOFC Technology

From solid fuels to substitute natural gas (SNG) using TREMP

Biomass gasification development of attractive business cases

FURNACEPHOSPHORUS AND PHOSPHORICACID PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM. Report No. 52. July A private report by. the

FAST PYROLYSIS EFFECT OF WOOD DRYING ON THE YIELD AND PROPERTIES OF BIO-OIL

PERFORMANCE OF A PILOT SCALE, STEAM BLOWN, PRESSURIZED FLUIDIZED BED BIOMASS GASIFIER

THE PRACTICAL, PROVEN PATH TO GREEN ENERGY. RTP rapid thermal processing from Envergent Technologies

Dissolved Gas Analysis Guide for Transformers Filled with Beta Fluid

SUPPLEMENTARY TOPIC 3 ENERGY AND CHEMICAL REACTIONS

Balancing chemical reaction equations (stoichiometry)

Determination of the enthalpy of combustion using a bomb calorimeter TEC

Power Generation through Surface Coal Gasification

Euler-Euler and Euler-Lagrange Modeling of Wood Gasification in Fluidized Beds

Options for tar reforming in biomass gasification. Klas J. Andersson, Poul Erik Højlund Nielsen - IFC 2012

North American Stainless

Thermodynamical aspects of the passage to hybrid nuclear power plants

Module 1: History of Fuels. Lecture 6: Fundamental definitions, properties and various measurements

Chapter Test B. Chapter: Measurements and Calculations

The monitoring and control of underground coal gasification in laboratory conditions

2 MATTER. 2.1 Physical and Chemical Properties and Changes

Fortum Otso -bioliquid

CHEM 105 HOUR EXAM III 28-OCT-99. = -163 kj/mole determine H f 0 for Ni(CO) 4 (g) = -260 kj/mole determine H f 0 for Cr(CO) 6 (g)

UNIVERSITA DEGLI STUDI DI ROMA LA SAPIENZA DIPARTIMENTO INGEGNERIA CHIMICA MATERIALI AMBIENTE

Unit 3 Notepack Chapter 7 Chemical Quantities Qualifier for Test

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Viresco Energy s Advanced Gasification Technology

Advantage of Using Water-Emulsified Fuel on Combustion and Emission Characteristics

Cofiring of biomass in coal-fired power plants European experience Dr Colin Henderson IEA Clean Coal Centre

Chapter Three: STOICHIOMETRY

Innovative processes for thermochemical SNG production from biomass

PREPARATION FOR CHEMISTRY LAB: COMBUSTION

North American Stainless

1.3 Properties of Coal

The Empirical Formula of a Compound

THE HUMIDITY/MOISTURE HANDBOOK

INTI COLLEGE MALAYSIA A? LEVEL PROGRAMME CHM 111: CHEMISTRY MOCK EXAMINATION: DECEMBER 2000 SESSION m/e

The Engineer s Guide to Efficiency Requirements for Wood Burning Appliances

Ecological Aspects of Oil Shale Processing

Chemistry B11 Chapter 4 Chemical reactions

Coal waste slurries as a fuel for integrated gasification combined cycle plants

Nu G Medical Waste System Technology (Pyrolysis / Thermal Decomposition)

Physical and Chemical Properties of Matter

Overview of Integrated Coal Gasification Combined-cycle Technology Using Low-rank Coal

SUBJECT/TASK (title) CONTRIBUTOR(S) Morten Fossum, Ranveig V. Beyer CLIENT(S) IEA Bioenergy TR NO. DATE CLIENT S REF. PROJECT NO.

Optimization of Steel and Methanol Production in an Integrated

Executive Summary. Catalyst Testing Results

THE PRODUCTION OF ELECTRICITY FROM WOOD AND OTHER SOLID BIOMASS

Praxair, Inc. Ray Roberge Sr. VP and Chief Technology Officer

Carbon Dioxide Membrane Separation for Carbon Capture using Direct FuelCell Systems

The Minimum Ignition Energy of Coal Dust in an Oxygen Enriched Atmosphere

Pioneering Energy Solutions for Sustainable Development! ETC Presentation 2013

SKI Coal Gasification Technology. Feb. 23, 2012

6 CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES

PRODUCTION AND GASIFICATION OF WASTE PELLETS

Process Integration of Chemical Looping Combustion with Oxygen Uncoupling in a Coal-Fired Power Plant

CHAPTER 3: MATTER. Active Learning Questions: 1-6, 9, 13-14; End-of-Chapter Questions: 1-18, 20, 24-32, 38-42, 44, 49-52, 55-56, 61-64

Technologies for small scale Biomass CHP-Plants an actual survey

Equilibria Involving Acids & Bases

An Experimental Study on Industrial Boiler Burners Applied Low NOx Combustion Technologies

Hybrid Power Generations Systems, LLC

Specific Volume of Liquid (Column 7). The volume per unit of mass in cubic feet per pound.

Gas emission measurements with a FTIR gas analyzer - verification of the analysis method Kari Pieniniemi 1 * and Ulla Lassi 1, 2

Experimental Study on Super-heated Steam Drying of Lignite

Impact of coal quality and gasifier technology on IGCC performance

Biomass Conversion to Electricity: Stand Alone Power Plants, Co-Generation,

Experimental Determination of Flash Points of Flammable Liquid Aqueous Solutions

Transcription:

A publication of CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TRANSACTIONS VOL. 50, 2016 Guest Editors: Katharina Kohse-Höinghaus, Eliseo Ranzi Copyright 2016, AIDIC Servizi S.r.l., ISBN 978-88-95608-41-9; ISSN 2283-9216 The Italian Association of Chemical Engineering Online at www.aidic.it/cet Two-stage Gasification of Untreated and Torrefied Wood Valentin Kosov, Victor Zaichenko Joint Institute for High Temperatures of the Russian Academy of Sciences (JIHT RAS) Address: Izhorskaya str. 13, 125412 Moscow, Russian Federation kosov@ihed.ras.ru The major methods of biomass thermal conversion are combustion in excess oxygen, gasification in reduced oxygen, and pyrolysis in the absence of oxygen. The end products of these methods are heat, gas, liquid and solid fuels. From the point of view of energy production, none of these methods can be considered optimal. Two-stage gasification of biomass proposed by JIHT RAS is pyrolysis of biomass, as the first stage, and cracking of the pyrolysis products as the second stage. This method can be considered optimal for energy production, because it allows obtaining synthesis gas consisting of hydrogen and carbon monoxide and not containing liquid or solid particles. Since no byproducts are formed, there is no need for complicated cleaning methods of the gas. In this study we investigated the effectiveness of heterogeneous cracking of pyrolysis products on the surface of charcoal in comparison with the homogeneous cracking. The effect of preliminary torrefaction of biomass on secondary cracking process and composition of the resulting synthesis gas was investigated. It is shown that the use of torrefied biomass allows obtaining a high-calorific gas even by homogeneous cracking of pyrolysis products. 1. Introduction Biomass gasification is a complex thermo-chemical process involving numerous different reactions (Dupont, 2007) and can be divided into two parts: pyrolysis and gasification itself. Pyrolysis of biomass occurs through heat transfer processes inside the gasifier. Thermal degradation of biomass during pyrolysis leads to the formation of mainly solid and liquid products.the composition and quantity of these products and the possibility of their use as a fuel have now been well studied (Bridgwater, 2012). Biomass gasification is a complex combination of secondary oxidation reaction of the biomass pyrolysis products. Depending on the type of gasification, the oxidizing agent may be air, oxygen, steam or a combination thereof. The end product of biomass gasification is synthesis gas consisting mainly of hydrogen and carbon monoxide, which are formed due to the reaction of carbon with oxygen or steam as shown at Eq(1) and Eq(2). С(s) + H2O CO + H2 (1) 2С(s) + O2 2CO Pyrolysis of biomass and subsequent gasification of the pyrolysis products occur in the same reactor volume, which creates technical difficulties related to the uniformity of oxidant distribution. Therefore there is also reaction of carbon complete oxidation to carbon dioxide (Eq(3)). C(s) + O2 CO2 In the case of steam gasification an excess of steam results in its incomplete reaction with carbon and unreacted water vapor come out of the reactor together with the synthesis gas (Eq(4)). C(s) + 2H2O CO + H2 + H2O (2) (3) (4)

In addition, the water-gas shift reaction (Eq(5)) can increase of carbon dioxide amount in synthesis gas. CO + H2O CO2+ H2 The Boudouard reaction (Eq(6)) allows converting carbon dioxide into carbon monoxide. However, at temperatures below 1000 C, this reaction is in equilibrium and the carbon dioxide remains in the synthesis gas. C(s) + CO2 2CO The known gasification methods can produce synthesis gas consisted of combustible components (H2, CO, CH4) and non-combustible gases and vapors (CO2, N2, H2O) in various proportions. The presence of noncombustible gas significantly reduces the overall efficiency of the technology by reducing the heating value of the synthesis gas. Furthermore, the tar formation in all types of gasification processes makes it impossible direct use of the product gas in the power generating units. Dividing of pyrolysis and gasification processes and the use of cracking instead of oxidation allows obtaining syngas that does not contain non-combustible components. Such a scheme is offered by JIHT RAS (Kosov et al., 2013). The two-stage process is pyrolysis of biomass, as the first stage, and cracking of the pyrolysis products on surface of charcoal as the second stage. This method allows obtaining synthesis gas consisting of hydrogen and carbon monoxide and not containing liquid or solid particles. Since no byproducts are formed, there is no need for complicated cleaning methods of the gas. Cracking reaction may be homogeneous and heterogeneous. Homogeneous cracking occurs in the volume of the reactor, the heterogeneous occurs on the reactor walls and on the surface of coal. For the practical application of the method it is necessary to investigate the processes of homogeneous and heterogeneous volatile pyrolysis products cracking, as well as to estimate the effectiveness of both cracking processes. Some of these studies have been performed previously ((Kosovo et al., 2014) and (Kosov et al., 2015)). It has been suggested that the heterogeneous cracking process decomposes volatiles formed upon pyrolysis temperatures of 200-300 C. This paper describes a series of experiments with torrefied wood, confirmed earlier assumptions made about the nature of the reactions of heterogeneous cracking of the pyrolysis products on the surface of charcoal. (5) (6) 2. Experimental set-up The experimental set-up (Figure 1) consisted of a high-temperature two-chamber fixed-bed reactor and a system of extraction and analysis of gas and vapor forming as a result of heating an initial raw material. The reactor was a stainless steel tube with an inside diameter of about 37 mm, which was placed within a twosection furnace with independent heaters for each section. The chambers were 300 mm length each. Raw material was placed into the chamber 1. There were series of experiments with different amount of char placed and different temperatures in the chamber 2. Pyrolysis process was explored when chamber 2 was empty and its temperature was 20 C. Figure 1: Scheme of the experimental reactor To explore homogeneous and heterogeneous cracking, the chamber 1 was heated up to temperature 1 000 C that was held further at the constant level. After that the temperature of the bottom chamber was raised at the rate 10 C/min. Process of homogeneous cracking was explored with empty chamber 2. To

explore heterogeneous cracking, char obtained by pyrolysis of the same raw material was placed in the chamber 2 and heated up to 1 000 C. Gases formed during pyrolysis of initial raw material passed through the porous carbon bed in the chamber 2. As a result of homogeneous and heterogeneous chemical reactions in the high-temperature zone, the pyrolysis gases decomposed into synthesis gas, which came into the volume meter (eudiometer). The samples of the gas were chromatographed. Softwood pellets were used as a raw material for pyrolysis. Carbonized softwood pellets were used as the hot char filter. The properties of the pellets are shown in Table 1. Table 1: Properties of softwood pellets Moisture (wt%) Dry material (wt%) LHV, MJ/kg Ash Volatiles C H N O 4.7 0.8 82.5 50.3 6.0 0.4 43.3 20.6 3. Results and Discussion The results of measurements of the volume gas produced per 1 kg of softwood pellets during pyrolysis and two types of tars cracking are shown in Fig. 2. The results indicate that the heterogeneous cracking is much more effective than homogeneous and allows obtaining the maximum volume of the gas in the same reactor. This gas volume is up to 1.5 m 3 per 1 kg of wood biomass. Figure 2: Gas yield per one kg of raw material during pyrolysis of softwood pellets and two types of tars cracking The mass balance of the pyrolysis process and the two types of secondary cracking is shown in Figure 3. The pyrolysis process, especially fast pyrolysis, aimed at obtaining liquid products. The proposed two-stage scheme of gasification uses a slow pyrolysis (biomass heating rate of 10 degrees per minute). The pyrolysis products consist of solid (18% by weight), liquid (58% by weight) and a gaseous fraction (24% by weight). As can be seen, homogeneous cracking of the liquid and gaseous pyrolysis products at the temperature of 1000 C causes a significant change in the mass balance. After homogeneous cracking the gaseous fraction of is already 82% by weight and the liquid fraction is only 10%. Heterogeneous cracking allows decomposing the liquid fraction completely. As a result, 82% of the weight of the raw material converts into the gas.

Figure 3: Mass balance of untreated wood pyrolysis and the two types of secondary cracking Figure 2 shows that as a result of heterogeneous cracking reactions, the gas volume increases almost double in comparison with homogeneous cracking. Heterogeneous cracking of the liquid fraction remaining after the homogeneous cracking the pyrolysis products and consisting mainly of water, cannot provide such a significant increase in the product gas. Therefore, increasing the volume of the product gas occurs due to decomposition of gaseous components of the synthesis gas obtained after the homogeneous cracking of liquid products of pyrolysis. Analysis of composition of the synthesis gas obtained by cracking of homogeneous and heterogeneous confirms this hypothesis (Table 2). Table 2: Composition of the synthesis gas for two types of untreated wood pyrolysis products cracking Component Homogeneous cracking Homogeneous cracking CO 36.8% 54.2% H2 47.1% 46.5% CO2 11.4% - CH4 14.4% - N2 0.3% 0.3% Synthesis gas produced by homogeneous cracking of the pyrolysis products contains about 25% of relatively heavy gases - methane and carbon dioxide. The decomposition of these gases to carbon monoxide and hydrogen doubles the volume of synthesis gas while their mass fraction remains constant. Previous research of output gas speed for homogeneous and heterogeneous cracking processes (Kosov et al., 2015) showed, that the maximum gas yield speed for reactions of heterogeneous cracking is in the temperature range from 200 C to 300 C, whereas the maximum gas yield speed for reactions of homogeneous cracking is in the temperature range from 300 C to 400 C (Figure 4). Pyrolysis products formed in this temperature range (also known as torrefaction) consist of a condensable and non- condensable fraction. Non-condensable fraction consists mainly of carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide. The mass of the non-condensable fraction in the total mass of the pyrolysis products is low and decomposition of carbon dioxide to carbon monoxide cannot provide a substantial increase in the product gas. Thus, it was argued that due to heterogeneous reactions it takes place decomposition of mainly condensable fraction of the pyrolysis products. Condensable fraction of the pyrolysis products for this temperature range consist mainly of acetic acid and water, with smaller quantities of methanol, formic acid, lactic acid, furfural, hydroxyl acetone and traces of phenol (Princs et al., 2006).

Figure 4: Speed of the gas yield by homogeneous (1) and heterogeneous (2) reactions It has been suggested that exactly these substances are decomposed during the heterogeneous cracking on the surface of charcoal, while other pyrolysis products are decomposed in the reactor volume. If this assumption is true, the heterogeneous cracking of torrefied biomass pyrolysis products will not lead increase the volume of the resulting synthesis gas. Comparison of the volume of gas produced by the pyrolysis of untreated and torrefied wood and two types of cracking of the volatile products of pyrolysis is shown in Figure 5. Figure 5: Volume of the gas obtained by homogeneous and heterogeneous cracking of untreated and torrefied wood pyrolysis products. As shown in Figure 5, in the case of torrefied wood pyrolysis, unlike untreated wood pyrolysis, heterogeneous cracking of volatiles does not lead to a significant increase in the volume of synthesis gas. Consequently, the pyrolysis products of torrefied wood do not contain components that decompose only heterogeneously. The slight increase in the volume of gas for the heterogeneous cracking can be explained by decomposition of methane and carbon dioxide, which is confirmed by the change of the gas composition (Table 3).

Table 3: Composition of the synthesis gas for two types of torrefied wood pyrolysis products cracking Component Homogeneous cracking Homogeneous cracking CO 41.4% 50.5% H2 37.5% 43.7% CO2 9.1% - CH4 6.1% - N2 1.2% 1.2% Thus, heterogeneous cracking decomposes pyrolysis products released from the biomass in the temperature range 200-300 C. 4. Conclusions From the data received it follows that heterogeneous cracking of volatile pyrolysis products in case of untreated wood is more effective than homogeneous cracking in volume of the reactor and allows receiving the maximum volume of synthesis gas in the same reactor. Analysis of the gas yield speed for two homogeneous and heterogeneous types of cracking shows that the maximum gas yield speed for reactions of heterogeneous cracking is in the temperature range from 200 C to 300 C, whereas the maximum gas yield speed for reactions of homogeneous cracking is in the temperature range from 300 C to 400 C. It can be argued that due to heterogeneous reactions it takes place decomposition of mainly condensable fraction of the pyrolysis products formed in the pyrolysis temperature range from 200 C to 300 C, also known as torrefaction. Comparison the volumes of synthesis gas produced by homogeneous and heterogeneous cracking of torrefied wood pyrolysis products confirmed this hypothesis. Thus, in the case of using the torrefied wood as a raw material for the two-stage gasification, homogeneous cracking of the volatile products of pyrolysis can be considered the optimal technical solution. Acknowledgements This work was supported by the Ministry of the Russian Federation for Education (project no. 14.607.21.0073, unique identifier RFMEFI60714X0073). References C. Dupont, G. Boissonnet, J.M. Seiler, P. Gauthier, D. Schweich. Study about the kinetic processes of biomass steam gasification, Fuel, 86, 2007, 32-40. Bridgwater A., 2012, Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading. Biomass and bioenergy, 38,, 68-94 Prins M.J., Ptasinski K.J., Janssen F.J.J.G., 2006, Torrefaction of wood. Part 2. Analysis of products, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. 77(1), 35 40. Kosov V., Kosov V., Sinelshchikov V., Zaichenko V., 2013, The two-stage technology of biomass conversion into synthesis gas. Materials and processes for energy: communicating current research and technological developments. Publisher: Formatex Research Center, Spain, 393-398. Kosov V., Kosov V., Zaichenko V., 2014, Experimental research of heterogeneous cracking of pyrolysis tars, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 37, 211-216, DOI: 10.3303/CET1437036 Kosov, V.V., Kosov, V.F., Zaichenko, V.M., Investigation of a two-stage process of biomass gasification, 2015, Chemical Engineering Transactions 43, pp. 457-462, DOI: 10.3303/CET1543077