Danielson Framework- Example Artifacts/Elements. Domain 1- Planning and Preparation and Domain 4- Professional Responsibilities



Similar documents
A Framework for Professional Practice

Section Two: Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession

TOOL KIT for RESIDENT EDUCATOR and MENT OR MOVES

GLOBAL-READY TEACHER COMPETENCY FRAMEWORK: STANDARDS AND INDICATORS

Elementary MEd I. The Relationship of the Program with the Unit s Conceptual Framework

School Social Worker - Observation and Performance Appraisal Rubric for Each Domain/Component. Domain 1: Planning and Preparation

Hamilton-Fulton-Montgomery BOCES Annual Professional Performance Review

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: Speech-Language Pathologists

Commission on Teacher Credentialing. Education Specialist Clear Program Standards

Masters of Reading Information Booklet. College of Education

Possible Artifacts for Danielson Domains One and Four

Colorado Professional Teaching Standards

Marion County Instruction Evaluation System

Enhancing Professional Practice: Overview of the Framework for Teaching. 1 of 25

EXAMPLE FIELD EXPERIENCE PLANNING TEMPLATE CCSU MAT Program

Final Intern Evaluation

Teacher Generated Examples of Artifacts and Evidence. Criterion Element Example Artifacts/ Evidence

Arkansas Teaching Standards

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Instructional Technology Facilitators

Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System. Teacher Evaluation Process Manual

BUILDING CURRICULUM ACCOMMODATION PLAN

NC TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS SAMPLE EVIDENCES AND ARTIFACTS

The performance assessment shall measure the extent to which the teacher s planning:

Reflective Practice: Goals for Professional Growth Library Media Specialist

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Speech- Language Pathologists

Revisioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina Master of Arts in Elementary Education Appalachian State University

Pre-service Performance Assessment Professional Standards for Teachers: See 603 CMR 7.08

GEORGIA STANDARDS FOR THE APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION UNITS AND EDUCATOR PREPARATION PROGRAMS

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Professional Development Self- Assessment Guidebook

Candidates will demonstrate ethical attitudes and behaviors.

CALIFORNIA S TEACHING PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS (TPE)

Teacher Rubric with Suggested Teacher and Student Look-fors

Key Principles for ELL Instruction (v6)

Guidance Counselor -Observation and Performance Appraisal Rubric for Each Domain/Component. Domain 1: Planning and Preparation

SALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT MENTOR SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE ASSESSMENT/REFLECTION LOG 2 nd and 3 rd Year Provisional Teachers

CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT CURRICULUM &PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT DIVISION

Master s in Educational Leadership Ed.S. in Administration and Supervision

THE FRAMEWORK FOR INSTRUCTIONAL COACH ENDORSEMENT GUIDELINES PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

ASU College of Education Course Syllabus ED 4972, ED 4973, ED 4974, ED 4975 or EDG 5660 Clinical Teaching

MILLIKIN TEACHING STANDARDS

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: Audiologists

Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems

At a Glance: Best Practices for Teacher Improvement Plans (TIP)

Framework and Guidelines for Principal Preparation Programs

Additional Qualification Course Guideline. Primary Education Specialist

Rubric for Effective Teacher Technology Use (Organized by the Four Domains of Danielson s Framework for Teaching 1 )

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Psychologists

Teacher Evaluation. Missouri s Educator Evaluation System

TEACHER EVALUATION GUIDE

How To Pass A Queens College Course

(Advanced Preparation)

EDUC SPECIAL EDUCATION: PART I (Six-Credit Course) Additional Qualification Course Distance Study Revised: May, 2011

Possible examples of how the Framework For Teaching could apply to Instructional Coaches

California University Intermediate Unit 1 ESL Professional Development Project

Such alternatives to the above qualifications as the board may find appropriate and acceptable.

Dewar College of Education and Human Services Valdosta State University Department of Early Childhood and Special Education

National Standards for Quality Online Teaching

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE. Teacher Performance Appraisal

Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. (2 nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Tackling the NEW Teacher Evaluation Guidelines

Additional Qualification Course Guideline Teaching Students with Communication Needs (Learning Disability)

Missouri Teacher Standards

Evidence Guide for the Proficient Teacher Standards

Crosswalk of the New Colorado Principal Standards (proposed by State Council on Educator Effectiveness) with the

GaPSC Teacher Leadership Program Standards

DOMAIN 1 FOR READING SPECIALIST: PLANNING AND PREPARATION LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT PROFICIENT EXCELLENT

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: Occupational Therapists

UCC/UGC/ECCC Proposal for Plan Change or Plan Deletion

Illinois Professional Teaching Standards

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

Sample Completed Summative Report Form for a Secondary Teacher 1*

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s School-Based Occupational Therapists

FRAMEWORK FOR EFFECTIVE TEACHING. Newark Public Schools Teacher Performance Evaluation

Mountain Home School District #193 Formal Evaluation

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

APPENDIX A: Examples of Observations and Documentation

Lincoln Park Public Schools Special Education Teacher Consultant Evaluation

Highly Qualified Teacher Professional Development Resource Guide

Framework for Teaching Possible Evidence List

THE FRAMEWORK FOR A TEACHER INTERN CERTIFICATION PROGRAM: SPECIFIC PROGRAM GUIDELINES PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

NW COLORADO BOCES ALTERNATIVE LICENSURE PROGRAM

STUDENT OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT PLAN (SOAP)

Exam papers from RE 5100, Beginning Readers and Writers. Assessment Summary Sheet from RE 5715, Reading Assessment and Correction

Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System. Principal Evaluation Process Manual

Endorsement. English as a Second Language P KAR 2:010. Kentucky teaching certificates. September 2008

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Social Workers

North Carolina School Library Media Coordinators Standards

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: Physical Therapists

Principal Practice Observation Tool

Instruction: Design, Delivery, Assessment Worksheet

Mississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric M-STAR

STANDARDS FOR ENGLISH-AS-A-SECOND LANGUAGE TEACHERS

ROCORI Schools Professional Development Program (PDP)

North Carolina Professional Technology Facilitator Standards

Transcription:

Danielson Framework- Example Artifacts/Elements Domain 1- Planning and Preparation and Domain 4- Professional Responsibilities Domain 1- Planning and Preparation and Domain 4- Professional Responsibilities are considered unobservable domains. Evidence for rating these domains is gathered through artifacts and professional conversations. It is important to note that a single evidence source may be used to demonstrate performance in more than one component (e.g. a lesson or unit plan, a meeting agenda, evidence of completion of a course). This list is not intended to be exhaustive but rather, offer an overview of how evidence is gathered for the unobservable domains. Domain 1- Planning and Preparation 1a: Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy Knowledge of Content Standards Within and Across Grade Levels Knowledge of Disciplinary Literacy Knowledge of Prerequisite Relationships Knowledge of Content-Related Pedagogy 1a- Example Artifacts/Elements Unit plan that includes both formative and summative assessments and is standards aligned Evidence of strategies that support student mastery of standards (GRR, Close Reading) Use of primary source document not included with textbook Agenda or notes from a content-related PD session Development of units of study aligned to standards- demonstrates knowledge of standards Certificate of completion for Teachscape learn modules related to component 1a Flexible planning using standards across grade-levels based on student data Peer mentoring around planning aligned to standards within the content area Completion of classes or workshops in or outside the district

1b: Demonstrating Knowledge of Students Knowledge of Child and Adolescent Development Knowledge of the Learning Process Knowledge of Students Skills, Knowledge, and Language Proficiency Knowledge of Students Interests and Cultural Heritage Knowledge of Students Special Needs and Appropriate Accommodations/Modifications Student interest inventory 1b Example Artifacts/Elements Teacher plans collaboratively with CC teacher supporting students with an IEP Teacher plans using culturally and linguistically relevant practices based on knowledge of students Teacher s chart of family information Teacher s journal of student interests, strengths and challenges Teacher incorporates knowledge of student interests into lessons and units (e.g. math questions about baseball on opening day) Teacher s list of students IEP modifications 1c: Selecting Instructional Outcomes Sequence and Alignment-Outcomes represent significant learning within the discipline Clarity-Outcomes refer to what students will learn not what they will do Balance- Outcomes reflect different types of learning such as knowledge, conceptual understanding and thinking skills 1c Example Artifacts/Elements Lesson/unit plans identify what students will learn not just what they do (activities) Unit plan that include standards-based objectives Measurement of the outcome is identified in the lesson or unit plan- assessment of learning is clear Outcomes represent learning that is essential in the content area Differentiated Instructional Plans based on groups or individual students Unit plans that include opportunities for connections within/across disciplines (e.g. Using evidence to support a claim)

1d: Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources Materials align with learning outcomes Materials that further teacher professional knowledge are available Resources for students are appropriately challenging 1d-Example Artifacts/Elements Lesson and/or unit plans identify materials and resources Teacher can discuss rationale for selecting resources for the lesson or unit Teacher uses a wide variety of materials to support students particular learning needs Teacher is able to integrate resources beyond the textbook to support student learning needs 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction Learning activities are designed to engage students and advance them through the content Instructional materials and resources aid instruction and are appropriate to the learning needs of students Instructional groups are intentionally organized to support learning Lesson and unit structure is clear and sequenced to advance student learning 1e-Example Artifacts/Elements Unit or lesson plans include a coherent instructional outcomes, activities, materials, methods and student groupings that all work together The plan includes a coherent set of activities that progress from simple to more complex Learning activities have reasonable time allocations Activities promote the appropriate level of cognitive demand on students Teacher understands and can discuss the rationale for student grouping The lesson plan fits within the overall unit plan as well as learning goals for the year The lesson/unit allows for student choice

1f: Designing Student Assessments Congruence with Standards-Based instructional outcomes-assessments match learning expectations Levels of Performance and Standards are clearly defined Design of Formative Assessments-assessments for learning are planned as a part of the instructional process Use for planning- Results of assessment guide future planning 1F-Example Artifacts/Elements Lesson plans clearly indicate correspondence between assessments and instructional outcomes Unit reflects a variety of performance opportunities for students Formative assessments are planned to inform minute-to-minute decision making during instruction Planning demonstrates that lessons are informed by previous assessment data There is opportunity for students to design and use assessments to measure their own learning Domain 4- Professional Responsibilities 4a: Reflecting on Teaching and Learning Accuracy of reflection Use of reflection in future teaching 4a-Example Artifacts/Elements Lesson reflections are captured in a journal, blog or specific lesson reflection form Notes from a PCT session where teachers discuss lessons, their efficacy and adjustments Teacher is able to reflect accurately on lesson in post-observation conference and suggest actions for strengthening the lesson and next steps Teacher reflects on individual learners or groups of learners and is able to identify next steps to better meet the needs of those students

4b: Maintaining Accurate Records Student completion of assignments Tracks student progress in learning both formally and informally Non instructional records (e.g. permission slips, collection of field trip monies or monies for school pictures) 4b-Example Artifacts/Elements Teacher has a system for recording formal and informal assessment results Teacher uses IC grade book and keeps records up to date Teacher can provide records to support claims about student progress Students can easily determine where they are at in terms of their own learning Teacher provides timely accurate reports to students and families relative to the learning progress 4c: Communicating with Families Shares information about the instructional program with families Provides information about individual progress with families Offers opportunities for engagement of families in the instructional program 4C-Example Artifacts/Elements The teacher regularly communicates with parents about instructional program (e.g. classroom newsletter, school newsletter, blog, email, school website) Teacher has evidence of opportunities for parent participation The teacher communicates with families in a culturally appropriate manner The teachers communications are clear and effective (i.e. parents understand the communications that they receive)

4d: Participating in Professional Community Relationships with colleagues Involvement in a culture of professional inquiry Service to the school Participation in school and district projects 4d- Artifacts/Elements The teacher interacts respectfully and collaboratively with other staff (e.g. SEAs, EAs, clerical and custodial staff) The teacher participates in team or department planning time and is willing to make contributions to further instructional improvement The teacher offers positive support to his or her colleagues (e.g. shares resources and opens classroom to share practice) There is evidence that other teachers in the building look to this teacher for leadership and guidance The teacher volunteers to serve on committees or special projects 4e: Growing and Developing Professionally Enhancement of content knowledge and pedagogical skill Receptivity of feedback from colleagues Service to the profession 4e-Artifacts/Elements Teacher remains current taking courses or reading professional literature and remaining current on the evolution of thinking regarding instruction Teacher actively pursue networks that provide collegial support and feedback Teacher is active in professional organization(s) in order to enhance personal practice, provide leadership and support colleagues Possible artifacts-pdp, Action plans from committees, classroom action research, articles and newsletters written by the teacher, professional development log (MMSD PD catalog, Your Courses record)

4f: Showing Professionalism Integrity and ethical conduct Service to students Advocacy Decision making Compliance with school and district regulations 4f-Artifacts and Elements Teacher frequently reminds participants in meetings that students are the highest priority The teacher respectfully challenges existing practice in order to improve student outcomes Teacher consistently fulfills district requirements, policies and procedures Teacher directly and respectfully confronts differences of opinion and seeks consensus