Department of the Navy Human Research Protection Program

Similar documents
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTIONS PROGRAM. DoD/DON-funded Research

Ethical Principles in Clinical Research. Christine Grady Department of Bioethics NIH Clinical Center

12.0 Investigator Responsibilities

Evaluation Instrument for Accreditation January 1, 2015

2014 Metrics on Human Research Protection Program Performance

Minimum Education Requirements for DoD Personnel Involved in Human Research Protection

To IRB, or Not to IRB? That Is the Question!

Evaluation Instrument for Accreditation January 1, 2016

Human Subjects Research (HSR) Series

Principal Investigator and Sub Investigator Responsibilities

IRB Submissions and Human Subjects Research Compliance. Georgia Health Sciences University

Investigator responsibilities for research conducted under the authority of the UTHSCSA Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Guidance on IRB Continuing Review of Research

Human Research Protection Program Good Clinical Practice Guidance for Investigators Investigator & Research Staff Responsibilities

Principal Investigator Responsibilities for Education and Social/Behavioral Researchers

Research Involving Human Subjects

RESEARCH STUDY PROTOCOL. Study Title. Name of the Principal Investigator

USE OF HUMAN SUBJECTS IN RESEARCH PRESENTED BY BRIAN WEIMER TULANE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH COMPLIANCE OFFICER

Institutional Review Board

INVESTIGATOR HANDBOOK

Code of Federal Regulations. TITLE 45 PUBLIC WELFARE Department of Health and Human Services PART 46 PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS

INTERIM SITE MONITORING PROCEDURE

IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Institutional Review Board. Reporting Adverse Events and Unanticipated Problems Involving Risks to Subjects or Others

Determining who the investigators are and who the principal investigator is:

The University of North Carolina at Greensboro Procedures for Human Research Protection

Study Protocol Template

ST. MICHAEL S HOSPITAL Guidelines for Reporting Serious Adverse Events / Unanticipated Problems to the SMH Research Ethics Board (REB) July 09, 2014

PRE-TEST/POST-TEST FOR THE RESEARCH ETHICS TRAINING CURRICULUM. Please indicate if the following statements are True (T) or False (F).

Data Safety Monitoring and the IRB. Bertha delanda IRB Training Specialist Research Compliance Office February 2011

Nova Southeastern University Institutional Review Board Policies and Procedures

SAN DIEGO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) INVESTIGATOR GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH USING HUMAN SUBJECTS

A Principal Investigator s Guide to Responsibilities, Qualifications, Records and Documentation of Human Research University of Kentucky

RE: Human Research Subject Protections Under Multiple Project Assurance (MPA) M- 1073

Submission Date: Project Start Date: Approximate Project End Date:

Laurie Shaker-Irwin, Ph.D., M.S. Co-Leader, Regulatory Knowledge and Research Ethics UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute

Standard Operating Procedures

Orientation Manual for Clinical Research Coordinators

University of Hawai i Human Studies Program. Guidelines for Developing a Clinical Research Protocol

Policy on Human Subject Protection Training, Certification and Recertification at AUB

Guide for Research Sites Seeking Accreditation

Department of Health and Human Services. Final Guidance Document

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (PIA) For the

Quality Monitoring Checklist

Catherine Jahrsdorfer, RN, BSN Director of Clinical Services USF Health Office of Clinical Research

This policy applies to all clinical research conducted at Beaumont Health System.

No Page 1 of 5. Issue Date 4/21/2014

General Guidelines for Awards Funded by the Department of Defense (DoD)

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for: Reporting of Serious Breaches of GCP or the Trial Protocol sponsored CTIMP s. Lisa Austin, Research Manager

Adventist HealthCare, Inc.

the Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Protecting Human Research Participants

2 Applicability: Effective Date: 1/15/2010 Revised: 8/13/2010, 9/10/10, 5/9/14

Revision(s) to an Approved Study Form

University of California Davis. Investigator Manual. Revised March 10, 2016

WHAT ARE THE SPECIFIC DIFFERENCES BETWEEN VERSION 5.5 AND VERSION 5.6 OF THE RESEARCH ETHICS COMMITTEE STANDARD APPLICATION FORM?

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD

Human Subjects Research at OSU

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Good Clinical Practice 101: An Introduction

Compensation in Safeguarding Children: Pediatric Medical Countermeasure Research

Guidance on Withdrawal of Subjects from Research: Data Retention and Other Related Issues

UC DAVIS OFFICE OF RESEARCH AAHRPP Preparation UC Davis Human Research Part IV Criteria for Review. Cindy Gates IRB Administration

Role of IRB/IEC in GCP. Benjamin Kuo, MD, Dr.PH, CIP.

Informed Consent in Human Subjects Research

INVESTIGATOR MANUAL. Table of Contents

U.S Department of Defense Standards of Conduct Office

Quality Management in Clinical Trials

Miami University: Human Subjects Research General Research Application Guidance

Hollie Goddard Sr. IRB Coordinator McKesson Specialty Health

Guidelines for preparing Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for Institutional Ethics Committee for Human Research

Subject: No. Page PROTOCOL AND CASE REPORT FORM DEVELOPMENT AND REVIEW Standard Operating Procedure

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR RESEARCH. 2. Notification of Serious Breaches of Good Clinical Practice or Study Protocol

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE: CONSOLIDATED GUIDELINE

PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (PIA) For the

STANDARD OPERATING POLICY AND PROCEDURE

RUTGERS POLICY. Policy Name: Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information

Legal and Ethical Issues Facing Computer & Network Security Researchers

Instructions for Form: Application for Claim of Exemption

IRB 101: HUMAN SUBJECTS PROTECTION PROGRAM

POST-GOVERNMENT EMPLOYMENT ADVICE OPINION REQUEST

Subj: MANAGEMENT OF SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE (SES) AND OTHER SENIOR EXECUTIVE POSITIONS IN THE MARINE CORPS

CLINICAL RESEARCH ROLES CLINICAL RESEARCH ROLESCLINICAL RESEARCH ROLES

CNE Disclosures. To change this title, go to Notes Master

Transcription:

Department of the Navy Human Research Protection Program Roles and Responsibilities of Principal Investigators May 2013

HISTORY AND REGULATIONS 2

US Historical Underpinnings Tuskegee Experiment Began in 1930 as a Public Health Service study of untreated syphilis 400 African-American men with syphilis and 200 without, participated in this study (none were told they were infected) Recruited without informed consent and were misinformed of some of the study procedures Although a cure was found in the 1940 s: Study continued as planned Participants were not informed or treated 3

US Historical Underpinnings Tuskegee study became public in 1972 through an Associated Press news article resulting in: Congressional advisory panel provided policy recommendations to ensure that such maltreatment would not happen again Recommended the establishment of a permanent boy with the authority to regulate all federally supported research involving human subjects 4

Legislative and Executive Action 1974: National Research Act passed and signed 1979: National commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research established by Congress 5

The Belmont Report Commission identified basic principles for guiding the involvement of human subjects in research Respect for Persons Autonomy/Informed Consent Additional protections for vulnerable subjects Beneficence Good research design Competent investigators Favorable risk/benefit analysis Justice Equitable selection of subjects Appropriate inclusion and exclusion criteria 6

Regulations and Policies DON human subject research is governed by Federal, DoD and DON policies: 10 USC 980: Limitation on Use of Humans as Experimental Subjects DoD Instruction 3216.02: Protection of Human Subjects and Adherence to Ethical Standards in DoD Supported Research SECNAVINST 3900.39D: Human Research Protection Program 7

Regulations and Policies 32 CFR 219: DoD s implementation of 45 CFR 46, Subpart A 45 CFR 46 Subpart B: Additional Protections for Pregnant Women, Human Fetuses, and Neonates Involved in Research 45 CFR 46 Subpart C: Additional Protections Pertaining to Biomedical and Behavioral Research Involving Prisoners as Subjects 45 CFR 46 Subpart D: Additional Protections for Children Involved as Subjects in Research 8

DEFINITIONS 9

Definitions Research a systematic investigation, including research development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge. [32 CFR 219.102(d)] Human subject a living individual about whom an investigator (whether professional or student) conducting research obtains Data through interventions or interaction with the individual, or Identifiable private information. [32 CFR 219.102(f)] 10

Definitions Research Involving Human Subjects Activities that include both a systematic investigation designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge, AND involve a living individual about whom an investigator conducting research obtains data through intervention or interaction with the individual or identifiable private information. --DoDI 3216.02 11

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR RESPONSIBILITIES PER SECNAVINST 3900.39D 12

1. Must be current federal employees Uniformed or civilian, staff, or trainee OR covered under the Intergovernmental Personnel Act (IPA), OR a consultant consistent with requirements at 5 USC 3109 AND, must be assigned to or employed by a specific command. Status as a contractor or federal retiree alone is not sufficient to qualify individuals as principal investigators for such research. 13

Principal Investigator Responsibilities 2. Complete and document initial and continuing research ethics and human subjects protections training. All personnel involved in reviewing, approving, supporting, conducting, managing, or overseeing research involving human subjects must complete initial and ongoing training PIs may access the online Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI) Program to meet the training requirements. This online training can be found at https://www.citiprogram.org. 14

Principal Investigator Responsibilities 3. Obtain written determination of whether the proposed activity is research with human subjects or the research meets criteria for exemption. Activities that do not qualify as research, activities that do not involve human subjects AND exemption determinations will be determined by IRB Chairs, IRB Vice chairs, designated IRB administrators, or designated officials of the HRPP. Investigators may not make these determinations. 15

Principal Investigator Responsibilities 4. Obtain institutional approval prior to conducting or continuing research. Scientific review is required. IRB review and recommendation for approval - The IRB will determine if the review will be by expedited procedures or by full board. The PI s CO is the approval authority and this may not be delegated. 16

Principal Investigator Responsibilities 5. Obtain institutional approval prior to implementing proposed amendments to approved research. All amendments require IRB review and Command approval. Includes amendments to exempt research. IRB review of amendments may be done by expedited procedures or by full board depending on the amendment. 17

Principal Investigator Responsibilities 6. Notify the IRB in writing of unanticipated problems involving risks to subjects or others; serious adverse events; serious or continuing noncompliance with the human subjects protection regulations and IRB requirements; and protocol deviations An unanticipated problems involving risks to subjects or others (UPIRTSO) is unexpected, related or possibly related to the research, and suggests greater risk than previously known. An adverse event is any unfavorable and unintended occurrence associated with the conduct of a research project. 18

6. (Continued) Principal Investigator Responsibilities Serious noncompliance is the failure to act in accordance with (federal, DoD and DON regulations, instructions, and policies) such that the failure could adversely affect subjects; A protocol deviation is any departure from the approved research plan (including the protocol, the recruitment plan, etc). 19

Principal Investigator Responsibilities 7. Obtain informed consent from research subjects or their legally authorized representatives and provide them a copy of the completed informed consent document prior to the start of research, unless a waiver of the documentation is approved by the institution. Voluntary informed consent is fundamental to ethical research with humans. Informed consent includes a thorough discussion with prospective subjects and/or their legally authorized representatives and continues for at least the duration of the research. Depending on the research, ongoing discussions and education of subjects may continue long after the original informed consent is obtained. 20

Contacts Please contact DON HRPP with any follow-up questions or concerns. Phone: 703-681-9629 Email: human.research@med.navy.mil Director, DON HRPP: CAPT William Deniston 21