The Effects of Caffeine on Reaction Time

Similar documents
Chapter 4 Online Appendix: The Mathematics of Utility Functions

Questions to Ask About Medications and Herbal Supplements

Written Example for Research Question: How is caffeine consumption associated with memory?

Effects of Caffeine on Cardiac and Skeletal Muscle Stimulation: A Noninvasive Study Based on a Single Dose of Caffeine

Tassimo The Art of the Perfect Cup

BOWEL & BLADDER CARE

University College Hospital. Contrast agent for radiotherapy CT (computed tomography) scans. Radiotherapy Department Patient information series

The following document includes information about:

Shampoo Properties Evaluation General Science

Daily Habits and Urinary Incontinence

FOLFOX Chemotherapy. This handout provides information about FOLFOX chemotherapy. It is sometimes called as FLOX chemotherapy.

Bottle Rockets. Vanderbilt Student Volunteers for Science. Fall 2008

Standard Deviation Estimator

Urinary Incontinence. Patient Information Sheet

Bodybuilding Industries. Catalogue

D avid Berger, M.D. FAAP Melanie Wardle, ARNP, CPNP. Elimination Diet for Food Allergies and Sensitivities

Measurement and Calibration

What to Do When Receiving Radiation Therapy to the Pelvis

Audit Readiness Lessons Learned

Chemical Weathering Lab. 4th grade PSI

Lesson Share TEACHER S NOTES. Making arrangements by Claire Gibbs. Activity sheet 1. Procedure. Lead-in. Worksheet.

Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Administration and Scoring Instructions

Unit 1 - Pure Substances and Mixtures Chapter 2: Solutions

Exp 13 Volumetric Analysis: Acid-Base titration

The Amazing Elephant Toothpaste! Lesson Overview

Presentation Prepared By: Jessica Rivers, BASc., PTS

The effects of caffeine on alertness: a randomized trial Morrocona MM, Smith A, Jones FH

Heat Illness Prevention Program

Heat Illness Prevention Program

Pre-lab Questions: 1. Write a balanced chemical equation with state symbols for the reaction catalyzed by peroxidase.

How do I report the findings from my experiment?

TEACHER ACTIVITY GUIDE

Bone Appétit: New Information on Calcium & Vitamin D QUESTION & ANSWER

Experiment 6 Coffee-cup Calorimetry

Quick Read Series. Information for people with seizure disorders

Organic Lab 1 Make-up Experiment. Extraction of Caffeine from Beverages. Introduction

Control Charts and Trend Analysis for ISO Speakers: New York State Food Laboratory s Quality Assurance Team

Kinetic Friction. Experiment #13

Panadol Extra (paracetamol and caffeine) for pain

Researchers: Adi Segev and Giora Pillar

Get help with problems before they get too big: if talking to your friends doesn t help, then please contact one of:

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN REFERENCE

Probability Distributions

NESCAFÉ Solution 8/60 Beverage System. Operations Manual

ACCELERATION DUE TO GRAVITY

Managing Bowel Problems after Cancer Treatment

Section 6.2 Definition of Probability

ph Test #1: Scaling Common Liquids (From a series of 5)

How much water do you use?

EXPERIMENT 9 Evaluation of the Universal Gas Constant, R

Scheduling Automation at Pathology Associates Medical Lab (PAML)

HEAT OF FORMATION OF AMMONIUM NITRATE

Chem 321 Lecture 13 - Acid-Base Titrations 10/10/13

Density Determinations and Various Methods to Measure

Grade 6 Math Circles Mar.21st, 2012 Probability of Games

Blood Alcohol Concentration: modeling with mathematics. NCCTM Greensboro October 7, 2004 Hutch Sprunt Appalachian State University

LAB ID and/or LABORATORY NAME: ASSESSOR NAME: CONTINUOUS RADON MONITOR (CRM) by Proportional Counting. Method Number: ELAP method code 7037

Drinking fluids and how they affect your bladder

HYPOTHESIS TESTING: CONFIDENCE INTERVALS, T-TESTS, ANOVAS, AND REGRESSION

What s the purpose? Our hope for the Gap Year is that throughout it you will learn to pursue Jesus more fully.

Experiment 1: Measurement and Density

Pelvic Floor Exercises for Women

Adding Integers with Counters: Student Activity Lesson Plan

SLEEP RIGHT SLEEP TIGHT

Experimental Uncertainties (Errors)

Living With Congestive Heart Failure

Section Composite and Inverse Functions

Chapter 10. Consumer Choice and Behavioral Economics

Objectives: Vocabulary:

Ratios and Proportional Relationships: Lessons 1-6

ERIC S GUIDE. to Teenage Bedwetting

Chemistry 111 Laboratory Experiment 7: Determination of Reaction Stoichiometry and Chemical Equilibrium

Tim Horton s unveils concept store The coffee maker experiments with beer and unisex washrooms David Friend, The Canadian Press July 17, 2014

Lab 3 - DC Circuits and Ohm s Law

QS114. NICE quality standard for irritable bowel syndrome in adults (QS114)

Research Methods & Experimental Design

A Determination of g, the Acceleration Due to Gravity, from Newton's Laws of Motion

Myocardial Perfusion (MIBI) scan

Coefficient of Determination

MSU Product Center Strategic Marketing Institute. The Market for Orange Juice Challenges and Opportunities. Getachew Abate

Shielding Ourselves from Ultraviolet Light

Medication Guide Rebif (Re-bif) Interferon beta-1a (in-ter-feer-on beta-one-â)

Bungee Constant per Unit Length & Bungees in Parallel. Skipping school to bungee jump will get you suspended.

Recipe card espresso ems B.V yst ter IKEA S In

DAY 2 (EXCEPT OF DEPARTURE OF 15 Th February) 1. Saariselkä - FISHING EXPERIENCE BY SNOWMOBILE. DAY 2 and DAY 3 2. Saariselkä - REINDEER SAFARI

Isolation of Caffeine from Tea

Work & Pregnancy Do Mix...

Acids & Bases Around the House Use a ph indicator to find acids and bases

Sample Size and Power in Clinical Trials

Lesson 20. Probability and Cumulative Distribution Functions

Using an Oscilloscope

How to Communicate With Your Divorce Attorney, Reduce Your Level of Stress, And Actually Save Money

Water Scarcity Ashley Schopieray

IDENTIFICATION OF POLYMERS 1998 by David A. Katz. All rights reserved

A Note to the Teacher About Using the Glow Stick Lab Can You Catch a Fish on a Moonbeam? By Ron Thompson, Biology Teacher

How to dial-in ESPRESSO. A step by step guide to calibrating your grinder. Espresso Brew Specs. Cleaning Tips

11+ For You Maths Paper Sample Questions

Transcription:

The Effects of Caffeine on Reaction Time Terry Sturtevant October 24, 2005 Purpose This is a sample lab report. It was also an attempt to see if a normal dose of caffeine would have a noticeable effect on reaction time. (I have included some comments about the report in red. I spent about 2 1/2 hours writing this up.) Methods An on-line reaction test was performed before drinking a cup of coffee, after about half of the coffee was consumed, and then again after the coffee was finished in order to try and observe the effects of caffeine on reaction time. (The test used was the one for Firefox users on the lab web page.) The results were analyzed statistically. The coffee used was Tim Horton s, from the kiosk in the Science building at WLU. The experiment was performed at about 2:00 on a Friday afternoon. The experimental subject, (the author), had not consumed any coffee for a few hours prior to the experiment. The amount of coffee was about 320ml. (The experiment was a sudden idea, and so some experimental details are not as specific as they might be in a more carefully planned experiment.) An uncertainty of 30ml in the volume is probably reasonable, mostly due to having to estimate after the fact since the coffee cup was not graduated. Physics Lab Supervisor 1

About 7±1 minutes passed during the drinking of the first half cup, and about 12±1 minutes passed during the drinking of the second half cup. The uncertainty in the time was relatively large since the amount of time taken to drink the coffee was not considered an important variable and so was not measured precisely. Results Since no uncertainty is given for the reaction time tester, but all times are given to 0.001s, an uncertainty of 0.001s has been assumed for these calculations. Trial number time 1 (s) time 2 (s) 1 0.316 0.408 2 0.506 0.338 3 0.270 0.300 4 0.310 0.291 5 0.391 0.355 t 0.359 0.338 σ 0.093 0.047 α 0.042 0.021 t 0.042 0.021 Table 1: Before coffee Note that in Table 1 the two average times agree within their uncertainties. (If I were going to include sample calculations of t, σ, α, and t, I would do it here. I used a spreadsheet, so the calculations only took me about 10 minutes. ) After drinking a half cup of coffee, and repeating the test, as shown in Table 2, the average times are shorter. Note that the two repetitions of the test agreed with each other within their uncertainties, as in the case before coffee above, however, they did not agree with the average times before coffee. The reaction time was shorter after one half cup of coffee. 2

Trial number time 1 (s) time 2 (s) 1 0.350 0.353 2 0.306 0.294 3 0.264 0.279 4 0.262 0.277 5 0.292 0.352 t 0.295 0.311 σ 0.036 0.038 α 0.016 0.017 t 0.016 0.017 Table 2: After 1/2 cup of coffee Trial number time 1 (s) time 2 (s) 1 0.298 0.322 2 0.381 0.372 3 0.305 0.319 4 0.348 0.358 5 0.297 0.304 t 0.326 0.335 σ 0.037 0.029 α 0.017 0.013 t 0.017 0.013 Table 3: After coffee The test was repeated after all of the coffee was consumed, and again the two tests agreed with each other within uncertainties. The results are shown in Table 3. Again, however, the results did not agree with the results in the previous case. In other words, after all of the coffee the reaction times did not agree with the times after half of the coffee. The reaction times were longer after a cup of coffee than after one half cup of coffee. (This was something I had not expected. I thought that if any effect was observable, it would be monotonic; ie. more coffee would have a greater effect.) 3

Statistic Before After 1/2 cup After coffee t 0.349 0.303 0.330 σ 0.070 0.036 0.032 α 0.022 0.011 0.010 t 0.022 0.011 0.010 Table 4: Summary (all values in seconds) Since each pair of 5 trials were consistent, they can be combined into 3 sets of 10 measurements, as shown in Table 4. Note that the results for sets of 10 are consistent with the results for sets of 5; the average after half a cup doesn t agree with the times before or after, although the before and after times agree with each other. Discussion of Uncertainties As has been previously stated, this experiment was not planned in advance, so there is a greater uncertainty in both the time taken and the volume of coffee consumed than would have been the case otherwise. However, since the intention was to see if an effect was noticeable, this is acceptable. The uncertainty in the reaction time measurements was actually quite small, enough that a few things can be noted. First of all, in each of the 3 cases, (before, halfway through, and after coffee), the two sets of 5 trials agreed with each other within uncertainties, so the amount of coffee consumed seems more important than other factors such as how many times the test had previously been performed. Second, the change in the average times from before the coffee to after half a cup is significant, and so it suggests that the coffee itself was the important difference. The most unexpected result was that the average times after coffee agreed with the times before coffee, but not with those after 1/2 cup. This may indicate that there is more than one process at work. To improve this experiment, along with taking more careful measurements of the volume of coffee, it would be useful to ensure that the subject has had no coffee for at least 12 hours prior to the experiment. It would also be useful to substitute a non-caffeinated hot drink, such as herbal tea, to see if the effect may be due to hot water rather than coffee specifically. Performing 4

the experiment at different times of day, as well as on both an empty and a full stomach would help to potentially eliminate other variables. Conclusions Before coffee, reaction time was measured to be t = 0.35 ± 0.02s. After one half cup of coffee, reaction time was measured to be t = 0.30±0.01s. After one cup of coffee, reaction time was measured to be t = 0.33 ± 0.01s. The times before and after coffee agree within their uncertainties. The times before and after 1/2 cup don t agree. There is a 0.35 0.30 100 = 14% 0.35 difference. The times after 1/2 cup and after a whole cup also don t agree. There is a 0.33 0.30 100 = 10% 0.30 difference. Because of these differences, it would appear caffeine does have a significant effect on reaction time, although it appears to be more complex than anticipated. 5