COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)



Similar documents
COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR VETERINARY USE (CVMP)

End of consultation (deadline for comments) 14 October Adoption by Committee for advanced therapies 15 October 2010

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)

POST-AUTHORISATION GUIDANCE. Human Medicinal Products

COMMITTEE FOR PROPRIETARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CPMP) COMMITTEE FOR VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CVMP)

Questions and answers on post approval change management protocols

Marketing Authorisation: The Evaluation Process

Regulatory approval routes in the European System for Medicinal Products

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE ON DATA MONITORING COMMITTEES

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE ON SIMILAR BIOLOGICAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

COMMITTEE FOR VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS GUIDELINE FOR THE CONDUCT OF POST-MARKETING SURVEILLANCE STUDIES OF VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

Questions and answers on post approval change management protocols

Guidelines. of

CMDv/BPG/001. BEST PRACTICE GUIDE for Veterinary Mutual Recognition Procedure (MRP) Edition 04. Edition date: 19 July 2013

CMD(v)/GUI/014. GUIDANCE for The Processing of Generic Applications Through MRP / DCP

Marketing Authorization Procedures in the European Union Making the Right Choice

Questions & answers on signal management

BEST PRACTICE GUIDE for Handling of Periodic Safety Update Reports

PROCEDURE FOR PREPARING GCP INSPECTIONS REQUESTED BY THE EMEA. GCP Inspectors Working Group

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

ICH Topic S 1 A The Need for Carcinogenicity Studies of Pharmaceuticals. Step 5

Guideline on stability testing for applications for variations to a marketing authorisation

Draft agreed by the QWP February Draft adopted by the CHMP for release for consultation March Draft endorsed by the CMD(h) March 2015

Draft agreed by the QWP February Draft adopted by the CHMP for release for consultation March Draft endorsed by the CMD(h) March 2015

Standard operating procedure

VOLUME 2A Procedures for marketing authorisation CHAPTER 1 MARKETING AUTHORISATION. November 2005

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)

Quick Response (QR) codes in the labelling and package leaflet of centrally authorised 1 medicinal products

The EU Clinical Trial Regulation A regulator s perspective

The Clinical Trials Regulation EU No 536/2014: and Phase I trials

EU Clinical Trials Register. An agency of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union. (Acts whose publication is obligatory)

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

II. AREA OF INVOLVEMENT OF PATIENTS AND CONSUMERS IN EMEA ACTIVITIES

COMMITTEE ON HERBAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (HMPC) FINAL COMMUNITY HERBAL MONOGRAPH ON AVENA SATIVA L., FRUCTUS

Adoption by CHMP for release for consultation November End of consultation (deadline for comments) 31 March 2011

EU Clinical Trials Regulation Regulation EU 536/2014

COMMITTEE FOR PROPRIETARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CPMP)

EMA Update Clinical Trials

GCP INSPECTORS WORKING GROUP <DRAFT> REFLECTION PAPER ON EXPECTATIONS FOR ELECTRONIC SOURCE DOCUMENTS USED IN CLINICAL TRIALS

ICH guideline Q8, Q9 and Q10 - questions and answers volume 4

QRD recommendations on pack design and labelling for centrally authorised non-prescription human medicinal products

Guideline on Process Validation

EUROPEAN COMMISSION ENTERPRISE DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. Brussels, ENTR/F2/BL D(2003) CT 1 Revision 2

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR VETERINARY USE (CVMP)

White Paper The EU Clinical Trials Regulation Main Changes and Challenges

Response of the German Medical Association

Authorisation and Restriction Newsletter

Adoption by GCP Inspectors Working Group for consultation 14 June End of consultation (deadline for comments) 15 February 2012

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE ON RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)

CHMP/BWP (COMMITTEE ABBREVIATION) GUIDELINE ON VIRUS SAFETY EVALUATION OF BIOTECHNOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

Clinical Trials Facilitation Groups

Annex. DRAFT Guidance Document on the Planning and Implementation of Joint Reviews of Pesticides. Revision 8 September 2010

REGULATION (EEC) No 2309/93

Clinical trials in developing countries submitted to EMEA for regulatory purposes

Clinical trials regulation

European Medicines Agency

Emergence of Compassionate Use programmes

Reflection paper on the Use of Interactive Response Technologies (Interactive Voice/Web Response Systems) in Clinical Trials

Procedures for management of revisions/renewals of certificates of suitability to the European Pharmacopoeia monographs

Work instructions. 1. Changes since last revision. 2. Records. 3. Instructions EXPLANATORY NOTES

EU Change Control Process for Change Requests in the Entire Area of Electronic Submissions for Human Medicinal Products Version 2.

The New EU Clinical Trial Regulation Potential Impacts on Sites

GUIDANCE for Administration of the Sunset Clause

Reflection paper on clinical aspects related to tissue engineered products

Serious Breaches. Ian Gravenor. Senior Clinical Project Manager Novo Nordisk Ltd

Cetirizin "Copyfarm" 10 mg Filmcoated tablet Oral Energivej 15, POB 69 DK-5260 Odense S Denmark Netherlands. Cetirizine dihydrochloride

Overview of Authorisation Procedures for Medicinal Products

Standard operating procedure

COMMITTEE FOR PROPRIETARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CPMP) NOTE FOR GUIDANCE ON THE PRE-CLINICAL EVALUATION OF ANTICANCER MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

TRANSATLANTIC TRADE AND INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP

European Medicines Agency decision

COMMITTEE ON HERBAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (HMPC) FINAL COMMUNITY HERBAL MONOGRAPH ON HYPERICUM PERFORATUM L., HERBA (TRADITIONAL USE)

MRP & DCP step by steb instructions how to apply and how the procedures are conducted

Draft agreed by Pharmacokinetics Working Party January Adoption by CHMP for release for consultation 17 February 2011

Clinical research: where are we with the new (Paediatric) RC trial Regulation

The European Clinical Trials Framework Update on the Draft Clinical Trials Regulation

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

COMMITTEE FOR PROPRIETARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CPMP)

The compassionate use of medicinal products.

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) DRAFT. Guideline on Risk Management Systems for Medicinal Products for Human Use

Enabling Discovery, Development, and translation of treatments for Cognitive Dysfunctions in Depression: A Workshop Session IV

Guideline on missing data in confirmatory clinical trials

COMMITTEE FOR PROPRIETARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CPMP)

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

Guide to Clinical Trial Applications

Reflection Paper on Medicinal Product Supply Shortages Caused by Manufacturing/GMP Compliance Problems

Compilation of individual product-specific guidance on demonstration of bioequivalence

ICH Topic Q 2 (R1) Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology. Step 5

Guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing biotechnology-derived proteins as active substance: quality issues (revision 1)

ICRIN Seminar on EU Regulation of Clinical Trials

ICH Topic E 2 A Clinical Safety Data Management: Definitions and Standards for Expedited Reporting. Step 5

Draft Agreed by Pharmacokinetics Working Party January End of consultation (deadline for comments) 31 May 2011

EUDRAVIGILANCE TELEMATICS IMPLEMENTATION GROUP

ICH guideline Q10 on pharmaceutical quality system

Transcription:

European Medicines Agency Pre-authorisation Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use London, 17 July 2006 Doc. Ref. EMEA/419127/05 COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE ON THE PROCEDURE FOR ACCELERATED ASSESSMENT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 14 (9) OF REGULATION (EC) No 726/2004 ADOPTION BY CHMP FOR RELEASE FOR CONSULTATION December 2005 END OF CONSULTATION (DEADLINE FOR COMMENTS) 10 February 2006 REVISED DRAFT ADOPTED BY CHMP April 2006 TRANSMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION June 2006 REVISED DRAFT ADOPTED BY CHMP July 2006 7 Westferry Circus, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4HB, UK Tel. (44-20) 74 18 84 00 Fax (44-20) 74 18 86 13 E-mail: mail@emea.eu.int http://www.emea.eu.int EMEA 2006 Reproduction and/or distribution of this document is authorised for non commercial purposes only provided the EMEA is acknowledged

GUIDELINE ON THE PROCEDURE FOR ACCELERATED ASSESSMENT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 14 (9) OF REGULATION (EC) No 726/2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. LEGAL BASIS AND PURPOSE... 3 2. SCOPE AND GENERAL PRINCIPLES... 3 3. EMEA ADVICE PRIOR TO SUBMISSION... 4 4. QUALIFICATION OF A REQUEST FOR AN ACCELERATED ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE... 4 5. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR AN ACCELERATED ASSESSMENT... 5 6. TIMETABLE... 6 EMEA/274268/2006 EMEA 2006 Page 2/7

1. LEGAL BASIS AND PURPOSE Recital 33 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 1 states that in order to meet, in particular the legitimate expectations of patients and to take account of the increasingly rapid progress of science and therapies, accelerated assessment procedures should be set up, reserved for medicinal products of major therapeutic interest, and procedures for obtaining temporary authorisations subject to certain annually reviewable conditions. Article 14 (9) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004, states that when an application is submitted for a marketing authorisation in respect of medicinal products for human use which are of major interest from the point of view of public health and in particular from the viewpoint of therapeutic innovation, the applicant may request an accelerated assessment procedure. The request shall be duly substantiated. If the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) accepts the request, the time limit (of 210 days to give an opinion) laid down in Article 6(3), first subparagraph, shall be reduced to 150 days. This document aims to provide guidance on the submission of a request for accelerated assessment, and the timetable of an accelerated assessment procedure. This document will be updated to include more detailed explanation and examples. 0. SCOPE AND GENERAL PRINCIPLES The accelerated assessment procedure is applicable to marketing authorisation applications for medicinal products for human use falling within the scope of articles 3(1) and 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004. This includes medicinal products for treatment, prevention or diagnosis. Applicants requesting an accelerated assessment procedure should justify that the medicinal product is expected to be of major public health interest particularly from the point of view of therapeutic innovation. Based on the request, the justifications presented, and the recommendations of the Rapporteurs, the CHMP will formulate a decision on the request for accelerated assessment. At the time of the request, the CHMP assessment of the request is based on the justification presented in favour of a claim of major public health interest and not on assessment of the marketing authorisation application. The CHMP will review the justifications and claims, and formulate a view on whether the request can be granted. After a request has been granted, at any time during the marketing authorisation application evaluation, if the CHMP considers that it is no longer appropriate to conduct an accelerated assessment the CHMP may decide to continue the assessment under standard centralised procedure timelines according to Article 6 (3) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004. The duration of the assessment outside a formal request for accelerated assessment is part of the normal functioning of the CHMP and is outside the scope of this guideline. There is no single definition of what constitutes major public health interest. This should be justified by the applicant on a case-by-case basis. The justification should present the arguments to support the claim that the medicinal product introduces new methods of therapy or improves on existing methods, thereby addressing to a significant extent the greater unmet needs for maintaining and improving the health of the Community. (See section 4.2, Justification for a request for accelerated assessment). A decision on accelerated assessment will be taken without prejudice to the CHMP opinion (positive or negative) on the granting of a marketing authorisation. The scientific evaluation of a marketing authorisation application is governed by a timetable adopted by the CHMP. The EMEA in consultation with the Rapporteurs prepares a timetable. This timetable is 1 OJ L 136, 30/4/2004 p. 1-33. EMEA/274268/2006 EMEA 2006 Page 3/7

then proposed to the CHMP for adoption. In general, the CHMP will take into consideration the standard timetable agreed for the evaluation of a centralised application (see Notice to Applicants, vol. 2A, chapter. 4). If a request for an accelerated assessment procedure is granted, the CHMP will take into consideration the standard timetable agreed for the accelerated assessment procedure (see section 6). The submission or outcome of a request for accelerated assessment is without prejudice to the fact that the CHMP may adopt a shorter or otherwise different than the standard timetable, as appropriate. In case of the granting of a request for an accelerated assessment procedure, the EMEA shall ensure that the opinion of the CHMP is given within 150 days. To facilitate the process of evaluation of a request for accelerated assessment and the necessary planning in the pre-submission phase of the marketing authorisation, it is recommended that a notification with the intent to submit a request for accelerated assessment be provided to the EMEA. The notification should be provided well in advance of the submission of the application for marketing authorisation. The actual request for accelerated assessment is submitted in a second step, prior to the start of the scientific assessment. Following assessment of the request, the CHMP decides on whether the request on accelerated assessment should be granted. 0. EMEA ADVICE PRIOR TO SUBMISSION 3.1 Notification of intent to submit a request for accelerated assessment The applicant should notify the intent to submit a request for an accelerated assessment procedure as part of the letter of intent to submit a marketing authorisation application to be sent to the EMEA 4-6 months in advance of the submission of the marketing authorisation application (see Notice to Applicants, volume 2, chapter 4.3. Procedure for submission of the marketing authorisation application). 3.2 Pre-submission guidance When preparing the submission of a marketing authorisation application, applicants have the opportunity to meet the EMEA to discuss relevant procedural or regulatory issues on the proposed submission. Applicants should seek guidance from the EMEA on the scheduled dates of CHMP plenary meetings and start of the procedure, to ensure timely submission of the request for accelerated assessment. In view of a potential request for accelerated assessment, it is strongly recommended that the applicant requests EMEA pre-submission advice as early as possible, to discuss the request for an accelerated assessment procedure and the timetable for the accelerated procedure. If necessary, as soon as Rapporteurs have been assigned, the applicant may request a pre-submission meeting with EMEA and the Rapporteurs, to present and discuss issues related to dossier presentation or the substantiating of the request for accelerated assessment. 0. QUALIFICATION OF A REQUEST FOR AN ACCELERATED ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE 4.1 Timing of the submission of a request for accelerated assessment For a smooth and reliable running of procedures and optimal planning of the work, the CHMP sets up timelines ahead of submissions for marketing authorisation. An accelerated assessment request has to be agreed in advance of the start of marketing authorisation application evaluation as it introduces changes in the operation of the CHMP and procedure timelines. Any request for accelerated assessment should be made as early as possible before the actual submission of the marketing authorisation application. The timing of the request should be at least 10 working days in advance of the CHMP plenary meeting preceding the intended start of the centralised procedure (see 3.2, Pre-submission guidance). In practice, submission of the request will generally occur at least between 10 to 30 days before the intended start of the procedure. The request (including EMEA/274268/2006 EMEA 2006 Page 4/7

the justification) should be sent electronically to the EMEA product team leader and all CHMP members. Following receipt of a request for accelerated assessment, the EMEA shall produce a briefing note including the Rapporteurs recommendations as to the appropriateness of an accelerated assessment. The CHMP will consider the request submitted by the applicant, the Rapporteurs recommendations, and the views of other CHMP members. If necessary, the CHMP may request clarifications from the applicant about the request. The CHMP will conclude on the acceptability or not of the request. The CHMP conclusions will be communicated to the applicant. The reasons for accepting or rejecting the request will also be summarised in the CHMP assessment report. 4.2 Justification for a request for accelerated assessment Applicants requesting an accelerated assessment procedure should duly substantiate the request and in particular, justify their expectation that the medicinal product is of major public health interest particularly from the point of view of therapeutic innovation. The key items to be described in the justification, and the appropriate level of detail, should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. The request should be presented as a short but comprehensive document (ideal length 5-10 pages). A justification including the major benefits expected should be submitted. The following list of key items would normally be addressed in a justification for a request for accelerated assessment: The unmet needs and the available methods of prevention, diagnosis or treatment. The extent to which the medicinal product is expected to have major impact on medical practice, its major added value, and/or how it addresses the greater unmet needs. A brief outline of the main available evidence (e.g., number of clinical trials, key results) on which the applicant bases its claim of major public health interest. 0. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR AN ACCELERATED ASSESSMENT 5.1 Duration of the analysis of the scientific data The process of scientific assessment, distribution of the assessment reports to the CHMP and sharing of assessment reports and information about the procedure with the applicant, etc. will in principle be the same as for a standard timetable (except for the different timelines). Where necessary, the CHMP will express the need for further information from the applicant (list of questions) to be provided in writing and/or at an oral explanation. The CHMP may agree to postpone the oral explanation to the next plenary meeting (1-month clock-stop) following the adoption of the list of questions. 5.2 Possible change to normal timetable Following the granting of a request, the CHMP shall adhere to the accelerated timetable in accordance with Article 14(9) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 for the assessment. However, at any time during the marketing authorisation application assessment, if the CHMP considers that it is no longer appropriate to conduct an accelerated assessment, the CHMP may decide to continue the assessment under the standard centralised procedure assessment timelines, following an appropriate timetable to be adopted by the CHMP, according to Article 6 (3) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004. Examples of such situations are when major objections have been identified that cannot be handled in an accelerated timetable, when a clock-stop longer than one month is requested by the applicant to prepare for the oral explanation, or when late in the procedure the need for GMP or GCP inspection becomes apparent. Similarly, in case of a negative trend following the oral explanation, the CHMP may decide to continue the assessment under normal assessment timelines. EMEA/274268/2006 EMEA 2006 Page 5/7

Having taken into consideration the normal timetable agreed by the CHMP for the evaluation of a centralised application, a timetable is prepared by the EMEA in consultation with Rapporteurs. This timetable is then proposed to the CHMP for adoption. The new timetable is communicated to the applicant. Where appropriate, the CHMP will consult the applicant to explain the reasons for the change to the assessment timetable, and seek clarifications and comments about the proposed revised timetable. The applicant may also submit a justified request for a change to a normal assessment procedure, for example if additional time is needed for the applicant to provide any information requested by the CHMP. The CHMP shall consider such requests on a case-by-case basis and if appropriate adopt a revised timetable following Article 6 (3) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004. The new timetable is communicated to the applicant. 5.3 Scientific Advisory Groups Following the acceptance of the accelerated assessment procedure, the need for consultation of the related Scientific Advisory Group (SAG) will be identified and a tentative meeting scheduled. The need for a meeting will be reconfirmed by the CHMP during the procedure (see section 6, Time table). The date of the tentative meeting and whether the need for a SAG meeting is confirmed will be communicated to the applicant. 0. STANDARD TIMETABLE FOR THE ACCELERATED ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE 6.1 Pre-submission phase Pre-submission meeting strongly recommended (see 3.2) Day 120 Notification of intent to submit a request for accelerated assessment (as part of the notification of intent to submit a marketing authorisation application, 4-6 months prior to submission of MAA) Day 30 to 10 Submission of request for accelerated assessment. The timing of the request should be at least 10 working days in advance of the CHMP plenary meeting preceding the intended start of the centralised procedure. The exact timing depends on the dates of the CHMP meeting preceding the intended start of the procedure. Generally this will occur between 10-30 days before the intended start of the procedure. Day 20 to 0 CHMP plenary meeting preceding the start of the procedure 6.2 Accelerated assessment procedure Circulation of Rapporteurs briefing note with recommendations on the request for accelerated assessment. Identification of the need for a SAG meeting. CHMP discussion, and conclusion on the request for accelerated assessment. The conclusions are communicated to the applicant. Day 1 Start of the centralised procedure Tentative SAG meeting scheduled after day 120 (see 5.3) Day 80 Rapporteurs assessment reports, and start of the peer-review phase Rapporteurs highlight the need for questions for the SAG, and SAG meeting. EMEA/274268/2006 EMEA 2006 Page 6/7

Day 110 End of the peer-review phase Day 120 Opinion, or CHMP expresses the need for additional information Adoption of list of questions to the applicant to be answered in writing and/or at an oral explanation The CHMP may agree to a justified request for a 1-month clock-stop to allow for the applicant to prepare for the oral and/or written explanation. Adoption of questions for the SAG and SAG meeting, if requested. Possible change to normal centralised timetable (see 5.2) Stop clock Submission of written responses Day 121-150 Oral explanation, restart of the clock Opinion or start of finalisation of opinion (see CPMP Guidance to Applicants on CPMP Oral Explanations in Relation to Centralised Applications, CPMP/2390/01 rev.1) Possible change to normal centralised timetable (see 5.2) EMEA/274268/2006 EMEA 2006 Page 7/7