COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR VETERINARY USE (CVMP)
|
|
|
- Domenic Blair
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 European Medicines Agency Veterinary Medicines and Inspections London, 18 May 2006 Doc. Ref. EMEA/CVMP/32995/2006 COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR VETERINARY USE (CVMP) GUIDELINE ON THE PROCEDURE FOR ACCELERATED ASSESSMENT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 39 (8) OF REGULATION (EC) No 726/2004 ADOPTED BY CVMP FOR RELEASE FOR CONSULTATION 16 February 2006 END OF CONSULTATION (DEADLINE FOR COMMENTS) 16 March 2006 ADOPTION BY CVMP 17 May 2006 DATE FOR COMING INTO EFFECT 22 May Westferry Circus, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4HB, UK Tel. (44-20) Fax (44-20) [email protected] Reproduction and/or distribution of this document is authorised for non commercial purposes only provided the EMEA is acknowledged
2 GUIDELINE ON THE PROCEDURE FOR ACCELERATED ASSESSMENT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 39 (8) OF REGULATION (EC) No 726/2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. LEGAL BASIS AND PURPOSE SCOPE AND GENERAL PRINCIPLES EMEA ADVICE PRIOR TO SUBMISSION QUALIFICATION OF A REQUEST FOR AN ACCELERATED ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR AN ACCELERATED ASSESSMENT TIMETABLE... 6 Page 2/7
3 1. LEGAL BASIS AND PURPOSE Recital 33 of Regulation (EC) No 726/ states that in order to meet, in particular the legitimate expectations of patients and to take account of the increasingly rapid progress of science and therapies, accelerated assessment procedures should be set up, reserved for medicinal products of major therapeutic interest, and procedures for obtaining temporary authorisations subject to certain annually reviewable conditions. Article 39 (8) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004, states that when an application is submitted for a marketing authorisation in respect of veterinary medicinal products of major interest, particularly from the point of view of animal health and from the viewpoint of therapeutic innovation, the applicant may request an accelerated assessment procedure. The request shall be duly substantiated. If the Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use (CVMP) accepts the request, the timelimit (of 210 days to give an opinion) laid down in Article 31(3), first subparagraph, shall be reduced to 150 days. This document aims to provide guidance on the submission of a request for accelerated assessment, and the timetable of an accelerated assessment procedure. This document will be updated to include more detailed explanation and examples. 2. SCOPE AND GENERAL PRINCIPLES The accelerated assessment procedure is applicable to marketing authorisation applications for veterinary medicinal products falling within the scope of articles 3(1) and 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004. Applicants requesting an accelerated assessment procedure should justify that the veterinary medicinal product is expected to be of major animal health interest particularly from the point of view of therapeutic innovation. Based on the request, the justifications presented, and the recommendations of the rapporteurs, the CVMP will formulate a decision on the request for accelerated assessment. At the time of the request, the CVMP assessment of the request is based on the justification presented in favour of a claim of major animal health interest and not on assessment of the marketing authorisation application. The CVMP will review the justifications and claims, and formulate a view on whether the request can be granted. After a request has been granted, at any time during the marketing authorisation application evaluation, if the CVMP considers that it is no longer appropriate to conduct an accelerated assessment (following discussion with the Applicant when necessary) the CVMP may decide to continue the assessment under standard centralised procedure timelines according to Article 31 (3) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004. The duration of the assessment outside a formal request for accelerated assessment is part of the normal functioning of the CVMP and is outside the scope of this guideline. There is no single definition of what constitutes major animal health interest. This should be justified by the applicant on a case by case basis. The justification should present the arguments to support the claim that the veterinary medicinal product introduces new methods of therapy or improves on existing methods, thereby addressing to a significant extent the greater unmet needs for maintaining and improving the animal health of the Community. Typical examples of greater unmet needs are serious, or life-threatening conditions when available methods are absent or by and large insufficient in terms of lack of available products or lack of efficacy as well as serious epizootic animal diseases and animal health threats recognised either by OIE or by the Community. 1 OJ L 136, 30/4/2004 p Page 3/7
4 The emphasis of the accelerated assessment procedure is on products that bring therapeutic innovation, i.e., products that introduce new methods (treatment, prevention, medical diagnosis), or improve on existing methods. A description of the expected major impact of the veterinary medicinal product in terms of veterinary practice, its major added value compared to existing methods, and/or how it addresses the greater unmet needs, should be provided to establish that the product is expected to be of major animal health interest (see section 4.2, Justification for a request for accelerated assessment). A decision on accelerated assessment will be taken without prejudice to the CVMP opinion (positive or negative) on the granting of a marketing authorisation. The scientific evaluation of a marketing authorisation application is governed by a timetable adopted by the CVMP. The EMEA in consultation with the rapporteurs prepare a timetable. This timetable is then proposed to the CVMP for adoption. In general, the CVMP will take into consideration the standard timetable agreed for the evaluation of a centralised application (see Notice to Applicants, vol. 6A, chapter. 4). If a request for an accelerated assessment procedure is granted, the CVMP will take into consideration the standard timetable agreed for the accelerated assessment procedure (see section 6). The submission or outcome of a request for accelerated assessment is without prejudice to the fact that the CVMP may adopt a shorter or otherwise different than the standard timetable, as appropriate. In case of the granting of a request for an accelerated assessment procedure, the EMEA shall ensure that the opinion of the CVMP is given within 150 days. To facilitate the process of evaluation of a request for accelerated assessment and the necessary planning in the pre-submission phase of the marketing authorisation, it is recommended that a notification with the intent to submit a request for accelerated assessment be provided to the EMEA. The notification should be provided well in advance of the submission of the application for marketing authorisation. The actual request for accelerated assessment is submitted in a second step, prior to the start of the scientific assessment. Following assessment of the request, the CVMP decides on whether the request on accelerated assessment should be granted. 3. EMEA ADVICE PRIOR TO SUBMISSION 3.1 Notification of intent to submit a request for accelerated assessment The applicant should notify the intent to submit a request for an accelerated assessment procedure as part of the letter of intent to submit a marketing authorisation application to be sent to the EMEA in advance of the submission of the marketing authorisation application (see Notice to Applicants, volume 6, chapter 4. Procedure for submission of the marketing authorisation application). 3.2 Pre-submission guidance When preparing the submission of a marketing authorisation application, applicants have the opportunity to meet the EMEA to discuss relevant procedural or regulatory issues on the proposed submission. Applicants should seek guidance from the EMEA on the scheduled dates of CVMP plenary meetings and start of the procedure, to ensure timely submission of the request for accelerated assessment. In view of a potential request for accelerated assessment, it is strongly recommended that the applicant requests EMEA pre-submission advice as early as possible, to discuss the request for an accelerated assessment procedure and the timetable for the accelerated procedure. If necessary, as soon as rapporteurs have been assigned, the applicant may request a pre-submission meeting with EMEA and the rapporteurs, to present and discuss issues related to dossier presentation or the substantiating of the request for accelerated assessment. Page 4/7
5 4. QUALIFICATION OF A REQUEST FOR AN ACCELERATED ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE 4.1 Timing of the submission of a request for accelerated assessment For a smooth and reliable running of procedures and optimal planning of the work, the CVMP sets up timelines ahead of submissions for marketing authorisation. An accelerated assessment request has to be agreed in advance of the start of marketing authorisation application evaluation as it introduces changes in the operation of the CVMP and procedure timelines. Any request for accelerated assessment should be made as early as possible before the actual submission of the marketing authorisation application. The timing of the request should be at least 10 working days in advance of the CVMP plenary meeting preceding the intended start of the centralised procedure (see 3.2, Pre-submission guidance). In practice, submission of the request will generally occur at least between 10 to30 days before the intended start of the procedure. The request (including the justification) should be sent electronically to the EMEA. Following receipt of a request for accelerated assessment, the EMEA shall produce a briefing note including the rapporteurs recommendations as to the appropriateness of an accelerated assessment. The CVMP will consider the request submitted by the applicant, the rapporteurs recommendations, and the views of other CVMP members. If necessary, the CVMP may request clarifications from the applicant about the request. The CVMP will conclude on the acceptability or not of the request. The CVMP conclusions will be communicated to the applicant. The reasons for accepting or rejecting the request will also be summarised in the CVMP assessment report. 4.2 Justification for a request for accelerated assessment Applicants requesting an accelerated assessment procedure should duly substantiate the request and in particular, justify their expectation that the veterinary medicinal product is of major animal health interest particularly from the point of view of therapeutic innovation. The risk of the epidemiological situation with regard to human and/or animal health must outweigh the benefit of a normal assessment timetable. The key items to be described in the justification, and the appropriate level of detail, should be evaluated on a case by case basis. The request should be presented as a short but comprehensive document (ideal length 5-10 pages). A justification including the major benefits expected should be submitted. The following list of key items would normally be addressed in a justification for a request for accelerated assessment: The unmet needs and the available methods of prevention, diagnosis or treatment. The extent to which the veterinary medicinal product is expected to have major impact on veterinary practice, its major added value, and/or how it addresses the greater unmet needs. A brief outline of the main available evidence (e.g., number of clinical trials, key results) on which the applicant bases its claim of major animal health interest. 5. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR AN ACCELERATED ASSESSMENT 5.1 Duration of the analysis of the scientific data Article 39(8) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 states that the applicant may request an accelerated assessment procedure when an application is submitted for a marketing authorisation in respect of veterinary medicinal products of major interest, particularly from the point of view of animal health and therapeutic innovation. If the Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use accepts the request the time-limit shall be reduced to 150 days. In specific cases of a serious disease epidemic the assessment time could be further reduced if the CVMP considers this to be appropriate. Page 5/7
6 The process of scientific assessment, distribution of the assessment reports to the CVMP and sharing of assessment reports and information about the procedure with the applicant, etc. will in principle be the same as for normal timetable (except for the different timelines). Where necessary, the CVMP will express the need for further information from the applicant (list of questions) to be provided in writing and/or at an oral explanation. The CVMP may agree to postpone the oral explanation to the next plenary meeting (1-month clock-stop) following the adoption of the list of questions. 5.2 Possible switch to normal time table Following the granting of a request, the CVMP shall adhere to the accelerated timetable in accordance with Article 39(8) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 for the assessment. However, at any time during the marketing authorisation application assessment, if the CVMP considers that it is no longer appropriate to conduct an accelerated assessment, the CVMP may decide to continue the assessment under the standard centralised procedure assessment timelines, following an appropriate timetable to be adopted by the CVMP, according to Article 31(3) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004. Examples of such situations are when major objections have been identified that cannot be handled in an accelerated timetable, when a clock-stop longer than one month is requested by the applicant to prepare for the oral explanation, or when late in the procedure the need for GMP or GCP inspection becomes apparent. Similarly, in case of a negative trend following the oral explanation, the CVMP may decide to continue the assessment under standard assessment timelines. Having taken into consideration the standard timetable agreed by the CVMP for the evaluation of a centralised application, a timetable is prepared by the EMEA in consultation with rapporteurs. This timetable is then proposed to the CVMP for adoption. The new timetable is communicated to the applicant. Where appropriate, the CVMP will consult the applicant to explain the reasons for the change to the assessment timetable, and seek clarifications and comments about the proposed revised timetable. The applicant may also submit a justified request for a change to a standard assessment procedure, for example if additional time is needed for the applicant to provide any information requested by the CVMP. The CVMP shall consider such requests on a case by case basis and if appropriate adopt a revised time table following Article 31(3) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004. The new timetable is communicated to the applicant. 6. TIMETABLE 6.1 Pre-submission phase Pre-submission meeting strongly recommended Day 120 Notification of intent to submit a request for accelerated assessment (as part of the notification of intent to submit a marketing authorisation application, 4-6 months prior to submission of MAA) Day 30 to 10 Submission of request for accelerated assessment. The timing of the request should be at least 10 working days in advance of the CVMP plenary meeting preceding the intended start of the centralised procedure. The exact timing depends on the dates of the CVMP meeting preceding the intended start of the procedure. Generally this will occur between days before the intended start of the procedure. Generally this will occur between days before the intended start of the procedure. The exact timing depends on the dates of the CVMP meeting preceding the intended start of the procedure. Page 6/7
7 Day 20 to 0 CVMP plenary meeting preceding the start of the procedure Day 0 Validation Circulation of EMEA/Rapporteurs briefing note on the request for accelerated assessment. CVMP discussion, and conclusion on the request for accelerated assessment. Timetable to be adopted if appropriate. The conclusions are communicated to the applicant. 6.2 Accelerated assessment procedure Day 1 Start of the centralised procedure Day 60 Rapporteurs assessment reports The rapporteurs will ensure that there is adequate and early interaction between the assessment teams to prepare for the upcoming discussions and next steps If the CVMP considers that the accelerated assessment procedure is no longer appropriate, then this will lead to a switch to a normal timetable and adoption of a CVMP list of questions at day 120 (see 5.1 and 5.2). Day 90 Opinion, or CVMP expresses the need for further information The CVMP may agree to a justified request for a 1-month clock-stop to allow for the applicant to prepare oral and/or written explanations. Possible change to standard timetable (see 5.2) Stop clock Submission of written responses Day 91 The applicant provides the information requested, restart of the clock Day 115 Rapporteurs joint assessment report Rapporteurs views on the need for oral or written explanations The applicant may request to provide an oral explanation to the CVMP Day 120 Opinion, or CVMP request for oral or written explanations The CVMP may agree to a request for a 1-month clock-stop to allow for the applicant to prepare oral or written explanations, if justified. Possible switch to normal time table (see 5.2) Day 121 Oral explanation (as appropriate), and Opinion, or start of finalisation of opinion Day 150 Opinion Possible change to standard timetable (see 5.2) Page 7/7
COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)
European Medicines Agency Pre-authorisation Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use London, 17 July 2006 Doc. Ref. EMEA/419127/05 COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE ON THE PROCEDURE
COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)
European Medicines Agency Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use London, 19 July 2007 Doc. Ref: EMEA/27170/2006 COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE ON COMPASSIONATE USE OF MEDICINAL
End of consultation (deadline for comments) 14 October 2009. Adoption by Committee for advanced therapies 15 October 2010
15 October 2010 EMA/CAT/418458/2008/corr. Committee for advanced therapies (CAT) Procedural advice on the certification of quality and nonclinical data for small and medium sized enterprises developing
POST-AUTHORISATION GUIDANCE. Human Medicinal Products
European Medicines Agency Post-authorisation Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use London, 23 February 2006 Doc. Ref. EMEA/180079/2005 POST-AUTHORISATION GUIDANCE Human Medicinal Products QUESTIONS AND
COMMITTEE FOR VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS GUIDELINE FOR THE CONDUCT OF POST-MARKETING SURVEILLANCE STUDIES OF VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS
The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products Veterinary Medicines and Information Technology EMEA/CVMP/044/99-FINAL COMMITTEE FOR VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS GUIDELINE FOR THE CONDUCT
Guidelines. of 16.05.2013
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 16.05.2013 C (2013) 2804 Guidelines of 16.05.2013 on the details of the various categories of variations, on the operation of the procedures laid down in Chapters, a, I and
CMDv/BPG/001. BEST PRACTICE GUIDE for Veterinary Mutual Recognition Procedure (MRP) Edition 04. Edition date: 19 July 2013
EMA/CMDv/83618/2006 BEST PRACTICE GUIDE for Veterinary Mutual Recognition Procedure (MRP) Edition 04 Edition date: 19 July 2013 Implementation date: 23 November 2006 CMDv Secretariat: European Medicines
CMD(v)/GUI/014. GUIDANCE for The Processing of Generic Applications Through MRP / DCP
EMEA/CMDv/262452/2008 GUIDANCE Edition number : 00 Edition date: 19 June 2008 Implementation date : 04 July 2008 CMD(v) Secretariat: 7 Westferry Circus, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4HB, UK Tel. (44-20) 74
Questions and answers on post approval change management protocols
30 March 2012 EMA/CHMP/CVMP/QWP/586330/2010 Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) Questions and answers on post approval change management protocols Draft agreed by CHMP / CVMP Quality
COMMITTEE FOR PROPRIETARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CPMP) COMMITTEE FOR VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CVMP)
European Medicines Agency Veterinary Medicines and Inspections London, 15 April 2005 EMEA/CVMP/134/02 Rev 1 CPMP/QWP/227/02 Rev 1 COMMITTEE FOR PROPRIETARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CPMP) COMMITTEE FOR VETERINARY
Questions and answers on post approval change management protocols
27 October 2010 EMA/CHMP/CVMP/QWP/586330/2010 Questions and answers on post approval change management protocols Draft Draft Agreed by QWP September 2010 Adoption by CHMP for release for consultation 23
COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE ON DATA MONITORING COMMITTEES
European Medicines Agency Pre-authorisation Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use London, 27 July 2005 Doc. Ref. EMEA/CHMP/EWP/5872/03 Corr COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE
Regulatory approval routes in the European System for Medicinal Products
Regulatory approval routes in the European System for Medicinal Products Cardiovascular Combination Pharmacotherapy Global Summit, Melbourne, 8 th May 2014 Presented by: Kevin Blake Human Medicines Research
Marketing Authorisation: The Evaluation Process
1 st EMEA Workshop for Micro, Small and Medium- Sized Enterprises (SMEs) Navigating the Regulatory Maze Marketing Authorisation: The Evaluation Process Dr Evdokia Korakianiti Scientific Administrator Centralised
BEST PRACTICE GUIDE for Handling of Periodic Safety Update Reports
EMEA/CMDv/408477/2007 12 March 2009 BEST PRACTICE GUIDE for Handling of Periodic Safety Update Reports Edition number : 00 Edition date: 12 March 2009 Implementation date : 27 March 2009 CMD(v) Secretariat:
EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Health systems and products Medicinal products authorisations, EMA Brussels, 27.03.2014 ENTR/6283/00 Rev 4 orphan\guidelines\format content
Marketing Authorization Procedures in the European Union Making the Right Choice
Life science i technical bulletin ISSUE N 33 /DECEMBER 2009 Marketing Authorization Procedures in the European Union Making the Right Choice AUTHOR: Arash Ghalamkarpour, PhD, Regulatory Affairs Associate,
COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)
London, 22 October 2009 Doc. Ref. EMEA/CHMP/EWP/692702/2008 COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) REFLECTION PAPER ON THE EXTRAPOLATION OF RESULTS FROM CLINICAL STUDIES CONDUCTED OUTSIDE
Official Journal of the European Union. (Acts whose publication is obligatory)
27.12.2006 L 378/1 I (Acts whose publication is obligatory) REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 12 December 2006 on medicinal products for paediatric use and amending
Guideline on stability testing for applications for variations to a marketing authorisation
21 March 2014 EMA/CHMP/CVMP/QWP/441071/2011- Rev.2 Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP)/ Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use (CVMP) Guideline on stability testing for applications
COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR VETERINARY USE (CVMP)
European Medicines Agency Inspections London, 19 May 2005 CPMP/QWP/4359/03 EMEA/CVMP/205/04 COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR VETERINARY USE (CVMP)
TRANSATLANTIC TRADE AND INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP
DISCLAIMER: The EU reserves the right to make subsequent modifications to this text and to complement its proposals at a later stage, by modifying, supplementing or withdrawing all, or any part, at any
COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE ON SIMILAR BIOLOGICAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS
European Medicines Agency Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use CHMP/437/04 London, 30 October 2005 COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE ON SIMILAR BIOLOGICAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS
Questions & answers on signal management
23 October 2015 EMA/261758/2013 Inspections and Human Medicines Pharmacovigilance Division This document addresses a number of questions which stakeholders, in particular marketing authorisation holders
ICH Topic S 1 A The Need for Carcinogenicity Studies of Pharmaceuticals. Step 5
European Medicines Agency July 1996 CPMP/ICH/140/95 ICH Topic S 1 A The Need for Carcinogenicity Studies of Pharmaceuticals Step 5 NOTE FOR GUIDANCE ON THE NEED FOR CARCINOGENICITY STUDIES OF PHARMACEUTICALS
This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents
2001L0020 EN 07.08.2009 002.001 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents B DIRECTIVE 2001/20/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
PROCEDURE FOR PREPARING GCP INSPECTIONS REQUESTED BY THE EMEA. GCP Inspectors Working Group
European Medicines Agency Inspections London, 20 September 2007 EMEA/INS/GCP/197228/2005 Procedure no.: INS/GCP/2 PROCEDURE FOR PREPARING GCP INSPECTIONS REQUESTED BY THE EMEA GCP Inspectors Working Group
Guideline on Process Validation
1 2 3 4 29 March 2012 EMA/CHMP/CVMP/QWP/70278/2012-Rev1 Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use (CVMP) 5 6 Draft Draft Agreed by CHMP /
The EU Clinical Trial Regulation A regulator s perspective
5 The EU Clinical Trial A regulator s perspective Author Martyn Ward, Group Manager, Licensing, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), UK. Keywords Clinical Trial Directive (the Directive);
GUIDANCE for Administration of the Sunset Clause
GUIDANCE Edition number : 02 Edition date: 16/07/2010 Implementation date : 28/12/2007 CMDv Secretariat: 7 Westferry Circus, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4HB, UK CMDv/TEM/013-00 Tel. (44-20) 74 18 84 00 Fax.
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 95 thereof,
L 121/34 DIRECTIVE 2001/20/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to
VOLUME 2A Procedures for marketing authorisation CHAPTER 1 MARKETING AUTHORISATION. November 2005
EUROPEAN COMMISSION ENTERPRISE DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Consumer goods Pharmaceuticals Brussels, ENTR/F2/BL D(2002) NOTICE TO APPLICANTS Revision 3 VOLUME 2A Procedures for marketing authorisation CHAPTER 1
EU Clinical Trials Regulation Regulation EU 536/2014
EU Clinical Trials Regulation Regulation EU 536/2014 María Jesús Zafra Director, QA & Compliance Table of contents 1 2 3 4 Introduction Timelines and main changes Highlights 5 Impact on company processes
REGULATION (EEC) No 2309/93
REGULATION (EEC) No 2309/93 Council Regulation (EEC) No 2309/93 of 22 July 1993 laying down Community procedures for the authorization and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use
EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL
Ref. Ares(2011)1044649-03/10/2011 EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Health systems and products Pharmaceuticals SANCO/D3/RSR/iv(2011)ddg1.d3. 1137738 Update 1 October 2011 HANDLING
VOLUME 6A Procedures for marketing authorisation
EUROPEAN COMMISSION ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Consumer goods Pharmaceuticals Brussels, 29.01.2007 ENTR/F2/KK D(2007) Revision 3.1 NOTICE TO APPLICANTS VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS VOLUME
The Clinical Trials Regulation EU No 536/2014: and Phase I trials
The Clinical Trials Regulation EU No 536/2014: and Phase I trials EUFEMED, Brussels, 20 May 2015 Presented by Fergus Sweeney Head, Inspections and Human Medicines Pharmacovigilance An agency of the European
EU Clinical Trials Register. www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu. An agency of the European Union
EU Clinical Trials Register www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu An agency of the European Union The EU Clinical Trials Register provides public access to information from the European Union (EU) clinical trial
GCP INSPECTORS WORKING GROUP <DRAFT> REFLECTION PAPER ON EXPECTATIONS FOR ELECTRONIC SOURCE DOCUMENTS USED IN CLINICAL TRIALS
European Medicines Agency London, 17 October 2007 Doc. Ref. EMEA/505620/2007 GCP INSPECTORS WORKING GROUP REFLECTION PAPER ON EXPECTATIONS FOR ELECTRONIC SOURCE DOCUMENTS USED IN CLINICAL TRIALS
COMMITTEE FOR PROPRIETARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CPMP)
The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use London, 19 March 2003 CPMP/EWP/785/97 COMMITTEE FOR PROPRIETARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CPMP) POINTS TO CONSIDER
LEBANESE MINISTRY OF HEALTH DIRECTIVE
LEBANESE MINISTRY OF HEALTH DIRECTIVE LAYING DOWN DETAILED GUIDELINES FOR SPONSORS OF CLINICAL TRIALS March 2012 Field of Application General Considerations Trial s submission Validity of the F-MRI opinion
Questions and answers on preparation, management and assessment of periodic safety update reports (PSURs)
18 April 2013 EMA/CVMP/PhVWP/126661/2009-Rev.3 Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use Questions and answers on preparation, management and assessment of Output from the training of veterinary
COMMITTEE ON HERBAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (HMPC) FINAL COMMUNITY HERBAL MONOGRAPH ON AVENA SATIVA L., FRUCTUS
European Medicines Agency Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use London, 4 September 2008 Doc. Ref. EMEA/HMPC/368600/2007 COMMITTEE ON HERBAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (HMPC) FINAL COMMUNITY HERBAL MONOGRAPH ON
Draft agreed by the QWP February 2015. Draft adopted by the CHMP for release for consultation March 2015. Draft endorsed by the CMD(h) March 2015
1 2 3 26 March 2015 EMA/CHMP/QWP/104223/2015 Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) 4 5 6 7 Reflection paper on the chemical structure and properties criteria to be considered for the evaluation
Draft agreed by the QWP February 2015. Draft adopted by the CHMP for release for consultation March 2015. Draft endorsed by the CMD(h) March 2015
17 December 2015 EMA/CHMP/QWP/104223/2015 Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) Reflection paper on the chemical structure and properties criteria to be considered for the evaluation of
Adoption by GCP Inspectors Working Group for consultation 14 June 2011. End of consultation (deadline for comments) 15 February 2012
10 December 2013 EMA/INS/GCP/600788/2011 Compliance and Inspection Reflection paper on the use of interactive response technologies (interactive voice/web response systems) in clinical trials, with particular
White Paper The EU Clinical Trials Regulation Main Changes and Challenges
White Paper The EU Clinical Trials Regulation Main Changes and Challenges Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Main Changes and Associated Challenges... 4 2.1 Procedure for Initial Authorisation...
Adoption by CHMP for release for consultation November 2010. End of consultation (deadline for comments) 31 March 2011
1 2 3 November 2010 EMA/759784/2010 Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use 4 5 6 7 Reflection paper on the need for active control in therapeutic areas where use of placebo is deemed ethical and
ICH Topic E 2 A Clinical Safety Data Management: Definitions and Standards for Expedited Reporting. Step 5
European Medicines Agency June 1995 CPMP/ICH/377/95 ICH Topic E 2 A Clinical Safety Data Management: Definitions and Standards for Expedited Reporting Step 5 NOTE FOR GUIDANCE ON CLINICAL SAFETY DATA MANAGEMENT:
European Medicines Agency decision
EMA/650134/2010 European Medicines Agency decision P/202/2010 of 27 October 2010 on the acceptance of a modification of an agreed paediatric investigation plan for propranolol hydrochloride, (EMEA-000511-PIP01-08-M02)
Response of the German Medical Association
Response of the German Medical Association to the European Commission proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on clinical trials on medicinal products for human use, and
The New EU Clinical Trial Regulation Potential Impacts on Sites
The New EU Clinical Trial Regulation Potential Impacts on Sites Angela Papa Associate Director, Clinical Management PPD Pierre-Frédéric Omnes Director, Site Start-Up and Regulatory INC Research Faculty
Work instructions. 1. Changes since last revision. 2. Records. 3. Instructions EXPLANATORY NOTES
Work instructions Title: Calculation of fees for GMP and product related inspections Applies to: P-CI-MQC staff Status: PUBLIC Document no.: WIN/INSP/2043 Lead Author Approver Effective Date: 13-APR-12
Authorisation and Restriction Newsletter
Authorisation and Restriction Newsletter August 2010, N 1 The information contained in this document is intended for guidance only and whilst the information is provided in utmost good faith and has been
Standard operating procedure
Standard operating procedure Title: Eligibility to the centralised procedure for medicinal products for human use Status: PUBLIC Document no.: SOP/H/3462 Lead author Approver Effective date: 05-FEB-16
Serious Breaches. Ian Gravenor. Senior Clinical Project Manager Novo Nordisk Ltd
Serious Breaches Ian Gravenor Senior Clinical Project Manager Novo Nordisk Ltd Serious Breaches of GCP or the Trial Protocol Agenda Why report? The legislation MHRA Guidance document Timelines Actions
Clinical Trials Facilitation Groups
Clinical Trials Facilitation Groups Guidance document for a Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure (VHP) for the assessment of multinational Clinical Trial Applications Version 2 Table of contents Doc. Ref.:
The European regulatory system for medicines and the European Medicines Agency
The European regulatory system for medicines and the European Medicines Agency A consistent approach to medicines regulation across the European Union An agency of the European Union This booklet is intended
Emergence of Compassionate Use programmes
Emergence of Compassionate Use programmes Rosanna Melchior, PharmD, MS IDRAC, Thomson Scientific Overview What is compassionate use (CU) Overview of CU in Europe Authorities and Sponsors Roles and Responsibilities
Reflection paper on the Use of Interactive Response Technologies (Interactive Voice/Web Response Systems) in Clinical Trials
1 2 3 5 August 2011 EMA/INS/GCP/600788/2011 Compliance and Inspection 4 5 6 7 Reflection paper on the Use of Interactive Response Technologies (Interactive Voice/Web Response Systems) in Clinical Trials
SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES (SPS)
TEXTUAL PROPOSAL SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES (SPS) Article 1 Scope and coverage This Chapter applies to all SPS measures that may, directly or indirectly, affect trade between the Parties. This
II. AREA OF INVOLVEMENT OF PATIENTS AND CONSUMERS IN EMEA ACTIVITIES
European Medicines Agency Post-authorisation Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use MINUTES OF THE EIGHTH MEETING OF THE EMEA HUMAN SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEES WORKING PARTY WITH PATIENTS' AND CONSUMERS' ORGANISATIONS
PHV- 4 version 1 ELECTRONIC ADVERSE DRUG REACTION REPORTING
PHV- 4 version 1 ELECTRONIC ADVERSE DRUG REACTION REPORTING This guideline supersedes guideline PHV 4 as of September 16 2008. 1. Introduction and general provisions 1.1 Purpose of the guideline The guideline
Work plan for GMP/GDP Inspectors Working Group for 2016
21 December 2015 EMA/INS/GMP/738756/2015 Compliance and Inspection Work plan for GMP/GDP Inspectors Working Group for 2016 Chairperson: Status David Cockburn January 2016 1. Meetings scheduled for 2016
Procedures for management of revisions/renewals of certificates of suitability to the European Pharmacopoeia monographs
PPR/CB PUBLIC DOCUMENT (LEVEL 1) PA/PH/Exp. CEP /T (04)18, 3R Strasbourg, July 2013 Certification of suitability to Monographs of the European Pharmacopoeia Procedures for management of revisions/renewals
Overview of Key Obligations Under Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 on the Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP)
Overview of Key Obligations Under Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 on the Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP) Summary This document examines the key aspects of the CLP
MRP & DCP step by steb instructions how to apply and how the procedures are conducted
MRP & DCP step by steb instructions how to apply and how the procedures are conducted 06 May 2013 Dubrovnik, Croatia Dr. Peter Bachmann Head of Unit Coordination Group European and International Affairs
REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT
1. Introduction REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT Research and development work, pre-clinical tests, clinical studies, facilities, and the manufacture and sale of the Company s products are and will continue to be
Clinical research: where are we with the new (Paediatric) RC trial Regulation
where are we with the new (Paediatric) RC trial Regulation, MD, PhD Ethical Committee DEEP Former member of the PDCO EMA With the aid of Fabio D'Atri European commission and Anabela Marcal of EMA The new
QRD recommendations on pack design and labelling for centrally authorised non-prescription human medicinal products
1 2 3 10 March 2011 Quality Review Documents (QRD) 4 5 6 7 QRD recommendations on pack design and labelling for centrally authorised non-prescription human medicinal products Draft Draft Agreed by Quality
Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)
22 June 2012 EMA/541760/2011 Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP) Module I Pharmacovigilance systems and their quality systems Draft finalised by the Agency in collaboration with Member
EU DIRECTIVE ON GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE IN CLINICAL TRIALS DH & MHRA BRIEFING NOTE
EU DIRECTIVE ON GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE IN CLINICAL TRIALS DH & MHRA BRIEFING NOTE Purpose 1. The Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC heralds certain additional responsibilities for the Medicines and Healthcare
Overview of Authorisation Procedures for Medicinal Products
Overview of Authorisation Procedures for Medicinal Products Updated by Martha Anna Bianchetto, PharmD, MBA OBJECTIVES q q Gain an understanding of the regulatory procedures necessary to grant a medicinal
EUROPEAN COMMISSION ENTERPRISE DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. Brussels, ENTR/F2/BL D(2003) CT 1 Revision 2
EUROPEAN COMMISSION ENTERPRISE DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Single market : management & legislation for consumer goods Pharmaceuticals : regulatory framework and market authorisations Brussels, ENTR/F2/BL D(2003)
COMMITTEE FOR PROPRIETARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CPMP) NOTE FOR GUIDANCE ON THE PRE-CLINICAL EVALUATION OF ANTICANCER MEDICINAL PRODUCTS
The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products Human Medicines Evaluation Unit London, 23 July 1998 COMMITTEE FOR PROPRIETARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CPMP) NOTE FOR GUIDANCE ON THE PRE-CLINICAL
Cetirizin "Copyfarm" 10 mg Filmcoated tablet Oral Energivej 15, POB 69 DK-5260 Odense S Denmark Netherlands. Cetirizine dihydrochloride
ANNEX I LIST OF THE INVENTED NAMES, PHARMACEUTICAL FORM, STRENGTH OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCTS, ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION AND MARKETING AUTHORISATION HOLDERS IN THE MEMBER STATES 1 CETIRIZINE DIHYDROCHLORIDE
Annex. DRAFT Guidance Document on the Planning and Implementation of Joint Reviews of Pesticides. Revision 8 September 2010
Annex DRAFT Guidance Document on the Planning and Implementation of Joint Reviews of Pesticides Revision 8 September 2010 Table of Contents SECTION 1 BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW OF THE JOINT REVIEW PROCESS...
Reflection paper on clinical aspects related to tissue engineered products
1 2 3 19 March 2012 EMA/CAT/CPWP/573420/2009 Committee for Advanced Therapies (CAT) 4 5 6 Reflection paper on clinical aspects related to tissue engineered products Draft Draft agreed by CPWP 7 October
Quick Response (QR) codes in the labelling and package leaflet of centrally authorised 1 medicinal products
22 July 2015 EMA/493897/2015 Human Medicines Evaluation Division Quick Response (QR) codes in the labelling and package leaflet of centrally authorised 1 medicinal General principles of acceptability and
COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE ON RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE
European Medicines Agency Post-authorisation Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use London, 14 November 2005 Doc. Ref. EMEA/CHMP/96268/2005 COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE
COMMITTEE ON HERBAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (HMPC) FINAL COMMUNITY HERBAL MONOGRAPH ON HYPERICUM PERFORATUM L., HERBA (TRADITIONAL USE)
European Medicines Agency Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use London, 12 November 2009 Doc. Ref.: EMEA/HMPC/745582/2009 COMMITTEE ON HERBAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (HMPC) FINAL COMMUNITY HERBAL MONOGRAPH
COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)
European Medicines Agency Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use London, 10 October 2007 Doc. Ref. COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE ON POTENCY TESTING OF CELL BASED IMMUNOTHERAPY
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Article 100 thereof;
DIRECTIVE 65/65/EEC Council Directive 65/65/EEC of 26 January 1965 on the approximation of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action relating to medicinal products (OJ L No 22 of
NRA FUNCTION IN CONTROLLING VACCINES IN CLINICAL TRIAL AND MARKETING AUTHORIZATION INDONESIA 2013 DVI MEETING 9 11 APRIL 2013 1
NRA FUNCTION IN CONTROLLING VACCINES IN CLINICAL TRIAL AND MARKETING AUTHORIZATION INDONESIA 2013 DVI MEETING 9 11 APRIL 2013 1 2 The National Agency of Drug and Food Control (NA-DFC) is a non departmental
CHMP/BWP (COMMITTEE ABBREVIATION) GUIDELINE ON VIRUS SAFETY EVALUATION OF BIOTECHNOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS
European Medicines Agency Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use London, 24 July 2008 Doc. Ref. EMEA/CHMP/BWP/398498/2005 CHMP/BWP (COMMITTEE ABBREVIATION) GUIDELINE ON VIRUS SAFETY EVALUATION OF BIOTECHNOLOGICAL
The European Clinical Trials Framework Update on the Draft Clinical Trials Regulation
The European Clinical Trials Framework Update on the Draft Clinical Trials Regulation Dr. Ilona Reischl BASG/AGES Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety GmbH Content - References "Proposal for a Regulation
Marketing Authorisation Of A Product In Czech Republic
MARKETING AUTHORISATION APPLICATION FOR NEW PLANT PROTECTION PRODUCTS VIA THE MUTUAL RECOGNITION PROCEDURE AS SPECIFIED UNDER REGULATION (EC) No 1107/2009 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
Reflection Paper on Medicinal Product Supply Shortages Caused by Manufacturing/GMP Compliance Problems
14 September 2012 /590745/2012 Patient Health Protection Reflection Paper on Medicinal Product Supply Shortages Caused by Manufacturing/GMP 1. Introduction Ensuring the security and Good Manufacturing
Clinical trials regulation
Clinical trials regulation The Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Clinical Trials on Medicinal Products for Human Use and Repealing Directive 2001/20/EC an update
A 4.5 Validity Period of a Marketing Authorisation
104 A 4.5 Examples of situations in which the notification procedure according to Art. 61(3) of the Community Code will apply are as follows: Minor changes to the package leaflet resulting from readability
Reflection paper on non-spontaneous adverse event reports (peer-reviewed literature, internet and social media)
1 2 3 19 May 2016 EMA/CVMP/PhVWP/357539/2015 Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use 4 5 6 7 Reflection paper on non-spontaneous adverse event reports (peer-reviewed literature, internet and
Overview of the EU CTA Regulatory Framework and Future Direction of the EU Clinical Trial Directive. Features
72 Features STEPHAN REYNIER Project Director Voisin Consulting, France Overview of the EU CTA Regulatory Framework and Future Direction of the EU Clinical Trial Directive Over the last few years, the European
EFPIA Principles for the Development of the EU Clinical Trials Portal and Database
Position Paper EFPIA Principles for the Development of the EU Clinical Trials Portal and Database Executive summary EFPIA sees the implementation of the Clinical Trials Regulation 1 as an opportunity to
EUDRAVIGILANCE TELEMATICS IMPLEMENTATION GROUP
European Medicines Agency Post-authorisation Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use London, 29 October 2004 Doc. Ref: EMEA/115735/2004 EUDRAVIGILANCE TELEMATICS IMPLEMENTATION GROUP NOTE FOR GUIDANCE ON
UK Implementation of the EU Clinical Trial Directive 2001/20/EC:
UK Implementation of the EU Clinical Trial Directive 2001/20/EC: GCP Aspects. Dr. Colin Wilsher, FRQA. BARQA GCP Committee Chairman; & Pfizer Worldwide Development Quality Assurance. GIQAR, Roma, October
