The information and application for completing the Coaching and Mentoring models application is available to you from several sources:



Similar documents
Sample Completed Summative Report Form for a Secondary Teacher 1*

Pre-service Performance Assessment Professional Standards for Teachers: See 603 CMR 7.08

Such alternatives to the above qualifications as the board may find appropriate and acceptable.

TOOL KIT for RESIDENT EDUCATOR and MENT OR MOVES

Section 2b: Observation/Feedback Approach

NC TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS SAMPLE EVIDENCES AND ARTIFACTS

To expand teachers use of a variety of resources to improve instruction

TEACHER IMPROVEMENT PLAN

The Elementary Education Program Brandeis University Waltham, MA 02454

Mentoring and Coaching Models

The Ohio Resident Educator Program Standards Planning Tool Final

Practicum/Internship Handbook. Office of Educational Field Experiences

What is the PYP Perspective on Assessment?

PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND APPRAISAL FORM NON-BARGAINING UNIT, NON-MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL

Literacy Coaching/ Reading Specialists

PRO-NET. A Publication of Building Professional Development Partnerships for Adult Educators Project. April 2001

Greenville City Schools. Teacher Evaluation Tool

Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System. Teacher Evaluation Process Manual

Possible examples of how the Framework For Teaching could apply to Instructional Coaches

SALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT MENTOR SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE ASSESSMENT/REFLECTION LOG 2 nd and 3 rd Year Provisional Teachers

TEAM PLANNING AND REPORTING

Chapter 4: Types of coaching

Leadership Portfolio

Internship Guideline Booklet for Interdisciplinary Studies (INDS) Texas Tech University Graduate School

Silicon Valley Mathematics Initiative Student Focused Math Content Coaching

Self Assessment Tool for Principals and Vice-Principals

EXAMPLE FIELD EXPERIENCE PLANNING TEMPLATE CCSU MAT Program

Section 2: Professional Development Approaches

Assessment, Recording and Reporting Policy

What Is a Portfolio? Why develop a professional portfolio?

Master of Science in Nursing Program. Nurse Educator PRECEPTOR / FACULTY / STUDENT ORIENTATION HANDBOOK. Angelo State University

6 Essential Characteristics of a PLC (adapted from Learning by Doing)

Running head: LESSONS LEARNED FROM A BEGINNING MATH COACH 1. Lessons Learned from a Beginning Math Coach. Susan Muir.

Master s in Educational Leadership Ed.S. in Administration and Supervision

Preschool For All Program Evaluation TEACHER SELF EVALUATION

Portfolio Evaluation Rubric Guide

SCHOOL COUNSELING PRACTICUM AND INTERNSHIP MANUAL

Reading Specialist. Practicum Handbook Addendum to be used in conjunction with the Education Unit Practicum Handbook

Section Two: Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession

Correlation Map of LEARNING-FOCUSED to Marzano s Evaluation Model

The performance assessment shall measure the extent to which the teacher s planning:

Evidence Guide for the Proficient Teacher Standards

Candidates will demonstrate ethical attitudes and behaviors.

DEEPER LEARNING COMPETENCIES April 2013

ST. THOMAS UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM WITH SUPERVISORY DUTIES

Optional Teacher Professional Development Plan (PDP) Template and Sample PDP

Requirements EDAM WORD STUDY K-3: PRINT AWARENESS, LETTER KNOWLEDGE, PHONICS, AND HIGH FREQUENCY WORDS

Practice Guidelines for Supervisors of Speech-Language Pathology Assistants

Cork Education and Training Board. Programme Module for. Customer Service. Leading to. Level 4 FETAC. Customer Service 4N1989

AUSTRALIAN PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS FOR TEACHERS I L C O U N C

Professional Education Competence Program

Section 4: Key Informant Interviews

Internship Guidelines for the Professional Science Master s Degree Program

THE FOUR NON NEGOTIABLES

... and. Uses data to help schools identify needs for prevention and intervention programs.

Information for New Scheme Teachers

CNL 8670 GRADUATE INTERNSHIP MANUAL FOR SCHOOL COUNSELING DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES

Oak Park School District. Counselor Evaluation Program

A guide to the evidence-based process for full registration SUPPORTING PROVISIONALLY REGISTERED TEACHERS

Certification Update Packet

Accreditation at Highly Accomplished and Lead Teacher. Information for Referees

Performance Appraisal Review for Exempt Employees

Sport Administration Internship Packet KI 8710

Frequently Asked Questions

Multiple Subject Internship Credential Single Subject Internship Credential Education Specialist Internship Credential

Practicum Requirements Special Education Program Old Dominion University

Bachelor of Education Early Childhood

Site Supervisor Handbook. for. School Counseling Ed.S. Students

Developing Research & Communication Skills

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Professional Development Self- Assessment Guidebook

Unique Professional Development Activities ACTIVITY NAME

National Board for Professional Teaching Standards Certification Incentive Program

Requirements & Guidelines for the Preparation of the New Mexico Online Portfolio for Alternative Licensure

Elementary Math Methods Syllabus

Graduate Certification Field Guide

Creating an Objective-based Syllabus. Danielle Mihram, Director Center for Excellence in Teaching University of Southern California

Self-Assessment Duval County School System. Level 3. Level 3. Level 3. Level 4

Support Services Evaluation Handbook

FOUNDATION YEAR Student Evaluation

Mentor s Guide. Mentorship Program Northern Kentucky University

THE FRAMEWORK FOR INSTRUCTIONAL COACH ENDORSEMENT GUIDELINES PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Psychologists Definition of an Effective School Psychologist

Assessment Techniques and Tools for Documentation

Cooperating Teacher s Role

Executive Leadership for Successful Schools

Chapter 2: Creating a coaching program

INTERNSHIP COUN 595 CLINICAL MENTAL HEALTH COUNSELING

Penn State Online Faculty Competencies for Online Teaching

DOMAIN 1 FOR READING SPECIALIST: PLANNING AND PREPARATION LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT PROFICIENT EXCELLENT

Autism Spectrum Disorder Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria Rubric

Revisioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina Master of Arts in Elementary Education Appalachian State University

THE SCHOOL BOARD OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TEACHER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM, TABLE OF CONTENTS

2. To support the Management Team through the assessment of learners work and assist in moderation where required.

ON-THE-JOB INTERNSHIP APPLICATIONS MUST MEET THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS

Transcription:

Getting Started The information on the following pages is for the Coaching and Mentoring Models of Professional Development Credit The information and application for completing the Coaching and Mentoring models application is available to you from several sources: You may copy the pages from the Summit School District Web site and paste the pages into a Microsoft Word document. You may download and print the PDF version of the application available on the web site. You may copy the pages from the Professional Development Binder that is available from your principal. You may access electronic versions of these pages from your school district server. Review the requirements and compile the information you need to complete the form. This application must be submitted to your school principal or supervisor and the Director of Professional Development for written approval prior to beginning the project. Allow time for modification if needed. Time cannot be documented prior to application approval. The application must be reflective of district/building goals. Save a copy of your application for yourself. Submit a copy to your school principal. After obtaining approving signature from your principal or supervisor, submit your application to the Director of Professional Development for final approval. The Director of Professional Development will send you notification of approval or denial. There must be a minimum of two (2) participants to begin a coaching or mentoring relationship and no more than three (3) enrolled. Coaching and Mentoring Models, Summit, Revised June, 2008 1

Coaching and Mentoring Models Professional Development Credit Coaching and Mentoring: Are professional development strategies that provide one-on-one learning opportunities for teachers focused on improving teaching practice Could involve classroom observation, co-planning instruction, material development and thinking together about the influence of their behavior on students (Showers and Joyce, 1996) Are typically a collegial relationship Use multiple forms of data to support making judgments, observations and inferences to improve teaching Collegial Coaching Examples: A partnership in which colleagues observe one another and hold focused discussions prior to and following shared teaching and learning experiences A collegial relationship between teachers with similar expertise as they work together to become more resourceful in planning, reflecting and problem solving about their teaching A series of structured and planned observations and discussions to help colleagues gather data, give feedback and reflect upon their teaching Mentoring Examples: A master teacher, recruited and assigned to help a novice teacher learn new knowledge and skills to improve his/her teaching practice A partnership with a teacher desiring to improve his/her practice in a particular area with a teacher who is experienced in that area Any literacy, numeracy, or technology coach and teacher wishing to improve skills in one of these areas Underlying Assumptions Reflections by an individual on his or her own practice can be enhanced by another s observations and perceptions Teachers working to master new materials or teaching practices benefit from ongoing assistance The time spent coaching or mentoring with a teacher is one of the single best opportunities for affecting change if you do it right. (Lin Kuzmich, 1999) Not to be confused with the state mandated mentorship for 1 st year teachers Coaching and Mentoring Models, Summit, Revised June, 2008 2

Coaching and Mentoring Model Professional Development Application This application must be submitted first to your school principal and then to the Director of Professional Development for written approval prior to beginning the project. This will allow for modification if needed. Time cannot be documented prior to application approval. The application must be reflective of district/building goals and direction. Save a copy of your application for yourself and submit a copy, in print, to the Director of Professional Development. Coaching or mentoring partners must complete this agreement together. Participant Name(s): Mailing Address: City: State: Zip: Work Phone: Home Phone: Beginning Date: Ending Date: E-Mail: Coaching and Mentoring Focus: Coaching and Mentoring Partner ship Leader: Coaching or Mentoring Professional Development Credit One semester hour of credit is equal to 15 clock hours. The minimum amount of credit that may be earned on an independent study is one semester. The maximum amount of credit is two semester hours. How much professional development credit do you intend to earn? (Professional Development Credit may be applied to Colorado licensure requirements.) Check the relationship that fits your application. Coaching ( Mentoring Use the profile describing each type when choosing the one that best fits your skills and purpose. Use pp.7 to help you select the description of your collegial relationship. Coaching and Mentoring Models, Summit, Revised June, 2008 3

SUMMARY PRODUCT This agreement will serve as your map for your coaching relationship. Agreement up-front on the following areas will contribute to the success of your coaching or mentoring experience. Use pp. 6 & 7 to help you think through the design of your coaching or mentoring relationship and the role of each partner. Focus for Learning or Achievement: At this point in your planning, what do you anticipate you will know and be able to do as a result of this coaching or mentoring relationship? How do you anticipate this will affect student learning? Purpose: How will you decide the purpose for each meeting so you can use your time well? Roles and Responsibilities: Describe the role and responsibilities of each partner in the relationship. Structure and Sharing Feedback: What ground rules have you set about the kind of sharing and feedback that will be most helpful to each partner? Evidence of Progress: What evidence might you collect to indicate you are making progress as a result of coaching or mentoring? (You could use anecdotal evidence, journal entries, lesson plans, data from observations, student work, etc.) Logistics: Outline the structure for your regularly scheduled meetings. Coaching and Mentoring Models, Summit, Revised June, 2008 4

Meeting Dates: Location: Time: Agreement of Participant: I am committed to the success of this coaching or mentoring relationship as outlined in this application. ( By checking this box I acknowledge acceptance of this agreement. Signature Date Signature of Building Principal or Supervisor Date Signature of Director of Professional Development Date Coaching and Mentoring Models, Summit, Revised June, 2008 5

COACHING OR MENTORING MODEL COACHING AND MENTORING TYPES The following will help you determine whether your collegial partnership will be more like coaching or more like mentoring. While there is overlap in the strategies used for both relationships, use these descriptors to help you select one or the other as the primary type of partnership. TYPE PURPOSE ROLES KEY ELEMENTS A partnership between COACHING teachers that is designed to promote professional growth. The experience is mutually beneficial. It contributes to improved practice for all partners and increased learning for students. This relationship tends to be less formal than a mentoring relationship. Colleagues observe and coach each other in a relationship that supports working together as critical friends. Coaching partners often hold planning discussions prior to teaching and learning experiences to identify areas for critique, reflection and growth. Following observation of a teaching demonstration, coaching partners collaborate to reflect upon the results and make improvements. Colleagues are skilled in: encouraging each other as they focus and reflect on improving their individual practice. communication strategies that promote thinking and learning. collegial planning for observation and reflective experiences. observation and data collection skills for giving feedback about teaching practice. MENTORING A district or school program designed to provide regularly scheduled support for new teachers. Mentoring is related to school culture, routines and policies as well as increased knowledge and skill in the teaching / learning professional practice. The relationship involves teacher mentors working with other teachers or administrator mentors working with other administrators. Mentor teachers or administrators with expertise in particular areas assigned to orient, coach and support another teacher or administrator as he or she develops confidence and improves practice. Protégé - usually a new staff member, one working on professional growth goals, or an experienced teacher trying to learn specific new knowledge / skills to improve his or her teaching practice in a given area. Mentors are master teachers or administrators who have: strong classroom management skills. strong content knowledge. a wide repertoire of teaching strategies. a wide range of assessment tools success in facilitating high student performance and achievement. collegial coaching skills. other SUPERVISING STUDENT TEACHERS A cooperative partnership between a school-based cooperating teacher and a university-based student teacher designed to provide regular mentoring and professional evaluation to help the individual develop as a professional. The relationship involves helping the student teacher develop Cooperating teachers are master teachers who work collaboratively with the university supervisor to support the development of the student teacher through observation, practice, mentoring, coaching and evaluation. Student teachers work with master cooperating teachers to learn knowledge / skills to Cooperating teachers are master teachers teaching and evaluating student teachers who demonstrate: strong classroom management skills, content knowledge and a wide repertoire of teaching planning, assessment and instructional techniques. success in facilitating high student performance and achievement. communication strategies that make thinking about planning, instruction and Coaching and Mentoring Models, Summit, Revised June, 2008 6

the knowledge, skills and experiences necessary to be a successful classroom teacher. improve their teaching practice in preparation for assuming fulltime teaching responsibilities. processes public. observation and data collection skills for giving feedback and encouraging reflective thinking about teaching practice. COACHING OR MENTORING MODEL COACHING AND MENTORING STRATEGIES Coaching and mentoring involve a variety of strategies that fall along a continuum. When partners use consultative strategies, one partner becomes the expert giving advice to the other [learner]. In collaboration, both partners share expert and learner roles. Cognitive Coaching, through strong questioning, facilitates the mediation of thinking, planning and reflecting around classroom practice. Coaches or mentors may not have experience with all of these strategies but must have enough coaching or mentoring skills to achieve the goals of the relationship. COACHING ANDMENTORING CONSULTATION COLLABORATION COGNITIVE COACHING STRATEGIES P URPOSE Give advice to... clarify goals plan for, observe and provide feedback about teaching practice improve teaching practice create resources Plan, observe, provide feedback and refine instructional strategies to... expand the knowledge base of both partners improve practice and student learning results Use an established set of strategies and conferencing maps to help a colleague think about and reflect on professional work as the individual shapes and reshapes his or her teaching practices and solves related problems. provide follow- up share resources and expertise develop collegial, professional relationships and diminish professional isolation R OLES The Coach or Mentor: The Coaching Partners: A teacher or administrator who... provides formal or informal enter the partnership with both meetings to observe professional practice. clarifies problems and successes. gives advice regarding solutions, resources, or changes in practice people targeting areas of their practices for examination and then providing and receiving feedback. collaborate as critical friends to improve teaching and student learning. when needed. The Protégé: A teacher or administrator who... participates in formal and informal meetings to plan or reflect on improving practice. The Coach or Mentor: A teacher or administrator who... asks insightful questions to coach partner s decision- making and reflective processes. helps a colleague examine the relationship between perceptions, attitudes, thinking and behaviors which will affect student learning. The Protégé: A teacher or administrator who... plans for and reflects on strategies for improving practice. K NOWLEDGE /S KILLS S UPPORTING THE S TRATEGY The Coach or Mentor: is a skillful teacher or administrator. is able to describe or demonstrate effective teaching / administration strategies has a thorough understanding of the curriculum being taught. practices good listening and communication skills. is sensitive to other s needs. The Coaching Partners: plan for and focus on developing skills and / or improving practice. practice good listening and communication strategies. are sensitive to each other s needs. are open to observation of and feedback on their teaching practice. The Coach or Mentor: demonstrates a thorough understanding of the elements [strategies and maps] of Cognitive Coaching. is a good role model. is effective in establishing rapport. practices good listening and communication strategies. has completed Cognitive Coaching and Mentoring Models, Summit, Revised June, 2008 7

is effective in establishing rapport. are effective in establishing rapport. Coaching training. General Responsibilities include: Organization COACHING OR MENTORING PARTNER ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Involve appropriate building administrators prior to forming a coaching partnership. Complete and submit the Professional Development Credit Application. Carefully review pp. 6&7, profiles of each of the Coaching and Mentoring Types, prerequisites and strategies to ensure that you have the skills you need to perform well in the coaching or mentoring role you have chosen. Decide on your focus for the coaching or mentoring activities and develop a schedule for the coaching interactions. Facilitating the Coaching or Mentoring Process Coaches and mentors accomplish their goals through both formal and informal functions, such as: Formulating agreements about each partner s role and responsibilities in the coaching or mentoring relationship and the commitments required to achieve their goals. Clearly defining the goals of the relationship as a whole and then the specific goals for each session. Providing direct assistance and guidance or collaborating with colleagues about instructional sessions, lesson planning, school policies and practices, aligning curriculum and assessments, planning, feedback and reflective processes, etc. Demonstrating and observing teaching Regularly recording progress toward the coaching or mentoring goals [in the coaching / mentoring Session Log p,12] and reflecting upon any obstacles, which might occur as barriers to accomplishing those goals. Participating in professional development activities that contribute to the goals of the coaching or mentoring relationship and sharing learning from those activities. Coaching and Mentoring Models, Summit, Revised June, 2008 8

Required Documentation COACHING AND MENTORING GUIDELINES Prior to beginning your work, complete the application and registration forms (pp. 1-5), get approval from your principal/supervisor, then send to the Dir. Prof. Dev. As you work, document your work clearly using the Coaching or Mentoring Log. (p. 12) Send the following to the Dir. Prof Dev within two weeks following completion of the coaching activities: Coaching or Mentoring Log (p. 12 ) Individual Reflection (p. 10) Evidence of Progress prepared by the coaching team (p. 11) Signed Final Roster and Credit Record (p. 13) Coaching and Mentoring Approval Form (received from Director of Professional Dev.) Support Upon request, and whenever possible, the Staff Development Council will provide teams with resources such as books, journal articles, audio tapes, videos, district coordinators / training personnel, facilitators, etc. Because of the collaboration with the Summit School District RE-1 and Adams State College, additional resources can often be coordinated for professional development efforts. For a list of potential resources from the university, contact the Staff Development Council. Credit For each semester hour of credit, the participant(s) must document 15 clock hours spent on the project. The minimum amount of credit that may be earned on a coaching or mentoring activity is one (1) semester hour. The maximum amount of credit is two (2) semester hours. Each partner will receive the same amount of Professional Development / Salary credit. No university credit is available for coaching and mentoring. Salary credit is available for approved coaching or mentoring activities. While coaching or mentoring requires some work during contract hours, the majority of the analysis and group work must be done outside contract hours. Coaching and Mentoring Models, Summit, Revised June, 2008 9

Part I COACHING OR MENTORING MODEL Summary Product / Report Procedures and Requirements INDIVIDUAL REFLECTION Directions: The purpose of the reflection is to encourage thinking on the content, experiences and the impact of the coaching or mentoring process on individual learning. Each partner must complete an individual reflection. Each partner must complete a thorough response to your work using the questions below as a guide. What are you learning about yourself and your area of focus as a result of this experience? How will you apply your learning to future professional practice? How did the process help you gain insights? What are you learning about being coached or mentored? What are you learning about coaching or mentoring another person? How did your needs change throughout the experience? Was the coaching or mentoring experience safe and non-threatening? What aspects of the experience would you change? Coaching and Mentoring Models, Summit, Revised June, 2008 10

Part II COACHING OR MENTORING MODEL EVIDENCE OF PROGRESS Directions: In the application forms you were asked to collect evidence to indicate that you have made progress toward your learning focus. (Anecdotal evidence, journal entries, lesson plans, data from observations, student work, etc.) Working together as coaching or mentoring partners, select the significant pieces of evidence of progress from those you have collected during your work. Submit the pieces of evidence you have selected in a single folder as your evidence of progress. Include a cover letter that describes and organizes the contents you are submitting. Documentation Checklist Within two weeks of the final work session, the coaching partners are responsible for submitting the following materials in one folder to the Director of Professional Development. Coaching or Mentoring Log (p. 12) Individual Reflection [one per coaching partner] (p. 10) Evidence of Progress (p. 11) Final Roster and Credit Record (p. 13) Coaching and Mentoring Approval Form received from the Director of Professional Development. Coaching and Mentoring Models, Summit, Revised June, 2008 11

Coaching and Mentoring Models, Summit, Revised June, 2008 12

Coaching or Mentoring Application Resource COACHING OR MENTORING LOG This information is required documentation for the Coaching or Mentoring Process. It must be included in the Summary Report at the completion of the coaching or mentoring experience. The coaching or mentoring partners will document the following for all coaching and mentoring activities. Date and Times of Sessions Focus of this Session (planning, observing, reflecting, feedback) Insights (Are you making progress toward your goals?) Insights on Coaching/Mentoring Process (How did this session affect you?) Subtotal of time on project (this page): (In clock hours) Cumulative hours to date: [Duplicate this sheet as needed.] Coaching and Mentoring Model, Summit 2008 Page 13

Coaching or Mentoring Application Resource Final Roster and Credit Record This is the final roster for those participants who have successfully completed the coaching or mentoring experience. Submit with final documentation materials. Coaching or Mentoring Focus: Coaching or Mentoring Team Leader(s): Participant s Name (last, first) Example: Brown, Susan 1. 2. 3. School or Building South Elem. Coaching Log Individual Reflection Part I Team Summary Report Part II Quarter Hours Awarded 2 Signature(s) of Coaching or Mentoring Partners Date Coaching and Mentoring Models, Summit 2008 Page 14