New Mexico Geological Society



Similar documents
FORENSIC GEOLOGY GEOLOGIC TIME AND GEOLOGIC MAPS

principles of stratigraphy: deposition, succession, continuity and correlation

Geologic History Review

TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY CORPUS CHRISTI COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROPOSAL FOR NEW COURSE/ELECTIVE. Credit Hours: 6 Semester: Summer Year: 2009

Geology. Administered by the Department of Physical Sciences within the College of Arts and Sciences.

LABORATORY TWO GEOLOGIC STRUCTURES

Sedimentary Rocks Practice Questions and Answers Revised September 2007

Geologic Time. Relative Dating. Principle of Original Horizontality. Relative Time. Absolute Time. Geologic Column

Topics: The Petroleum System. Origin of Petroleum. Arguments for biogenic origin. Google search : Origin of Petroleum : Hugoton Gas Field (Kansas)

Alfred Wegener s Theory of Continental Drift Became Modern Plate Tectonics. Wegener in Greenland about He froze to death there in 1930.

Petrel TIPS&TRICKS from SCM

Vulnerability Assessment

Field Meeting Report: The Shelve Inlier, led by Bill Dean 17 th May 1987

Nautilus Global Schedule 2016

Geological Maps 1: Horizontal and Inclined Strata

Nemaha Strike-Slip Fault Zone

Open-File Report By Michael H. Trippi and Robert D. Crangle, Jr. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey

GEOLOGIC MAPS. PURPOSE: To be able to understand, visualize, and analyze geologic maps

Seismic stratigraphy and small 3D seismic surveys

All sediments have a source or provenance, a place or number of places of origin where they were produced.

Characteristics of Sedimentary Rocks

GEOLOGIC HISTORY OF OKLAHOMA Compiled by Kenneth S. Johnson, Oklahoma Geological Survey

Integrated Interpretation of Thrust belt area based on Seismic and Surface Geologic Mapping- A case study from Upper Assam Basin, India

Geology 200 Getting Started...

Middle Pennsylvanian Brachiopods. From the Mud Springs Mountains and

Broadband seismic to support hydrocarbon exploration on the UK Continental Shelf

Geologic time and dating. Geologic time refers to the ages relevant to Earth s history

1. You are about to begin a unit on geology. Can anyone tell me what geology is? The study of the physical earth I.

Sedimentary Rocks, Depositional Environments and Stratigraphy

sufilter was applied to the original data and the entire NB attribute volume was output to segy format and imported to SMT for further analysis.

Responding to New Discoveries: Workflow and Strategies for Conquering the Data Gap and Overcoming Stuck-In-Rut Thinking *

Geologic Time. This page last updated on 08-Oct-2015

Summary of Rock Salt Deposits in the United States as Possible Storage Sites for Radioactive Waste Materials

Data Mining and Exploratory Statistics to Visualize Fractures and Migration Paths in the WCBS*

The Fossil Record and Geologic Time Scale

Geologic Criteria for Eastern Kentucky Permanent CO 2 Storage (Saline reservoir test)

Lecture Outlines PowerPoint. Chapter 11 Earth Science, 12e Tarbuck/Lutgens

Carbonate Rock Formation

USING RELATIVE DATING AND UNCONFORMITIES TO DETERMINE SEQUENCES OF EVENTS

FROM SEDIMENT INTO SEDIMENTARY ROCK. Objectives. Sediments and Sedimentation

Petrophysical Well Log Analysis for Hydrocarbon exploration in parts of Assam Arakan Basin, India

Sedimentary Rocks. Find and take out 11B-15B and #1 From Egg Carton

Exploring How Rocks Are Formed

Geology Merit Badge Workbook

Interview with Vello Kuuskraa

Bedrock Formations in DGR-1 to DGR-6. Sean Sterling and Michael Melaney

Review of the Late Pleistocene Soricidae (Mammalia) fauna of the Vaskapu Cave (North Hungary)

7) A clastic sedimentary rock composed of rounded to subrounded gravel is called a A) coal. B) shale. C) breccia.

SEDIMENTARY ROCKS. Sedimentary rocks are formed near or at the surface of the earth.

Multilevel Monitoring and Characterization of the Edwards and Trinity Aquifers of Central Texas

Session No Tuesday, 3 November 2015: 8:00 AM- 12:00 PM.

Structural Geology Laboratory 9 (Name)

SLOPE AND TOPOGRAPHY

Understanding Complex Models using Visualization: San Bernardino Valley Ground-water Basin, Southern California

GROUND RESPONSE OF KATHMANDU VALLEY ON THE BASIS OF MICROTREMORS

North Atlantic and Rio Tinto Joint Venture Potash Project in Saskatchewan, Canada. Resource Summary

Ground Water in the Piedmont and Blue Ridge Provinces of North Carolina

CORPORATE PRESENTATION. January 2016

What is a rock? How are rocks classified? What does the texture of a rock reveal about how it was formed?

Introduction to Structural Geology

Tu-P07-02 Workaround to Build Robust Facies Model with Limited Input Data - A Case Study from North West Kuwait

Geologic Time Scale Newcomer Academy Visualization Three

Our Deep Geothermal Energy Potential: A Case Study in Saskatchewan with Application Throughout the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin

4.10 Geological models

OFFSHORE Information Management

Proposal for SVP 2013 Fieldtrip Sharktooth Hill Bonebed: a marine middle Miocene bonebed and environs

Metamorphic rocks are rocks changed from one form to another by intense heat, intense pressure, and/or the action of hot fluids.

Securing the future of decom

Stratigraphic Cross Sections Why study old rocks?

REGULATIONS FOR THE POSTGRADUATE DIPLOMA IN EARTH SCIENCES (PGDES)

The Digital Atlas of Ordovician Life: digitizing and mobilizing data for paleontologists and the public

Episodic Global Tectonics: Sequence Stratigraphy Meets Plate Tectonics

MINERAL COMPOSITION OF THE AVERAGE SHALE

The Geology of Calavera Hills, North San Diego County, California

How To Map A Lake In The North Of The Holland (Fiji)

Rocks & Minerals 1 Mark Place,

GEL 113 Historical Geology

Required Courses in Geology Major

Petroleum System of Early Cretaceous Forearc Basin: Sinop Basin, Central Black Sea Onshore - Northern Turkey*

ROCKS OF THE GRAND CANYON BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR DOCENTS

QUATERNARY DATING METHODS 1: RELATIVE DATING TECHNIQUES

Ch6&7 Test. Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

How To Create A 3D Model Of The Phanerozoic Succession In Southern Manitoba

TECTONICS ASSESSMENT

SAFARI An outcrop analogue database for reservoir modelling

GeoConvention 2013: Integration 1

How Did These Ocean Features and Continental Margins Form?

May October Acquiring, Exploring and Developing Oil and Gas Projects in North and South America TSX.V: PTP

Hardness Comparisons

Rocks & Minerals. 10. Which rock type is most likely to be monomineralic? 1) rock salt 3) basalt 2) rhyolite 4) conglomerate

Three-Dimensional Geologic Model of the. Arbuckle-Simpson Aquifer, South-Central

The El Centenario Au-Ag Project

Long-Distance, Transported Hard Rocks

Transcription:

New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/26 The Lead Camp limestone and it correlatives in south-central New Mexico George O. Bachman and Donald A. Myers, 1975, pp. 105-108 in: Las Cruces Country, Seager, W. R.; Clemons, R. E.; Callender, J. F.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 26 th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 376 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1975 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States. No material from the NMGS website, or printed and electronic publications, may be reprinted or redistributed without NMGS permission. Contact us for permission to reprint portions of any of our publications. One printed copy of any materials from the NMGS website or our print and electronic publications may be made for individual use without our permission. Teachers and students may make unlimited copies for educational use. Any other use of these materials requires explicit permission.

This page is intentionally left blank to maintain order of facing pages.

New Mexico Geol. Soc. Guidebook, 26th Field Conf., Las Cruces Country, 1975 105 THE LEAD CAMP LIMESTONE AND ITS CORRELATIVES IN SOUTH-CENTRAL NEW MEXICO by GEORGE 0. BACHMAN and DONALD A. MYERS U.S. Geological Survey Denver, Colorado 80225 INTRODUCTION Nomenclature of Pennsylvanian rocks in New Mexico has posed many problems. Facies changes that cross time lines (faunal zones) are characteristic of these rocks. This characteristic has contributed to two major types of nomenclature: (1) naming of mappable or rock-stratigraphic units, and (2) naming of faunal zones or biostratigraphic units, with little regard to how they relate to each other. Both nomenclatures result in a great number of stratigraphic names, but most workers have applied the first type because it follows the conventions of mappability as outlined by the Code of Stratigraphic Nomenclature (American Commission on Stratigraphic Nomenclature, 1970). Some workers, however, have applied biostratigraphic names, because of the intricate biostratigraphic relations of these rocks and because it appears more practical, in some places, to correlate faunal zones from one mountain range to another than to try to correlate rock units. In deep basins in the subsurface, it is more difficult to divide Pennsylvanian rocks on a lithologic basis alone, and faunal zones serve a useful purpose. Our approach to this problem of stratigraphic nomenclature has been to use principles of both physical stratigraphy and biostratigraphy. We have traced rock units in the field and have attempted to fit these units and their changes in facies into mappable formations. While tracing units we collected fusulinids; these fusulinids were used as the basis for a framework of faunal zones for the formations. Owing to the problems of correlating rock units from one mountain range to another, our approach encourages a multiplicity of stratigraphic names. Regardless of this disadvantage, we believe that this approach will lead ultimately to a better understanding of the stratigraphy and to a more precise interpretation of the paleogeography. Our correlations are shown on Table 1 and Figure 2. Local names are preferable to the usage of "Magdalena Formation" or "Magdalena Group." The Magdalena has been used in the past to designate rocks of predominantly Pennsylvanian age in New Mexico and West Texas. Where exposed, individual formations can usually be mapped on the basis of lithology; the term Magdalena Group is superfluous and its use should be discouraged. The fusulinid zones used in this report are those outlined by Thompson (1964, p. C389-393). The generic name Beedeina is now used for most North American species that were formerly referred to Fusulina (Ishi, 1957, 1958). Hence, the "zone of Beedeina" is used instead of "zone of Fusulina." The zone of Millerella includes latest Mississippian and Early Pennsylvanian time; the zone of Profusulinella, early Middle Pennsylvanian time; the zone of Fusulinella, middle Middle Pennsylvanian time; the zone of Beedeina, late Middle Pennsylvanian time; and the zone of Triticites, Late Pennsylvanian time. LEAD CAMP LIMESTONE Southern San Andres Mountains We named the Lead Camp Limestone for "the massive cliffforming cherty limestone beds that unconformably overlie the Mississippian and underlie the rocks of the Panther Seep Formation" in the southern part of the San Andres Mountains (Bachman and Myers, 1969, p. 22) (Figs. 1, 2). The lower part of the Lead Camp includes temporal equivalents of the Sandia Formation and may be traced into the northern part of the San Andres Mountains (Bachman, 1965; Bachman and Harbour, 1970). In the northern part of the mountains, the calcareous beds typical of the lower-part of the Lead Camp at its type section have been replaced by shale and sandstone typical of the Sandia Formation, and the northern rocks are separable into these two formations. We have applied the name Lead Camp Formation to the massive limestone of Pennsylvanian age in the San Andres Mountains. This name is useful in this local area because the rock units can be traced through lateral facies and faunal changes. The nomenclature of the Franklin Mountains to the

south (Harbour, 1972) and of other nearby mountain ranges is inapplicable because the sequence of rocks in those locations is different. The rock units most easily correlated between mountain ranges are those between the Caballo Mountains (Kelley and Silver, 1952) to the west and the northern part of the San Andres Mountains. To the east of the San Andres Mountains, different facies relations prevail and local names have been introduced (Pray, 1961). We have not attempted to use the nomenclatures of either the Caballo or the Sacramento Mountains, because the east-west facies relations of Pennsylvanian rocks are not known. The Lead Camp consists mostly of massive, cliff-forming, cherty limestone. The limestone is medium to dark gray and weathers gray to brown. Chert is common as nodules and lenses, and replaces some intervals of limestone 4 to 5 ft (1.2 to 1.5 m) thick. In the type section, calcareous shale is present in the basal 240 ft (75 m) of the formation. The presence of these clastic beds suggests lithologic equivalence to the Sandia Formation in the northern part of the San Andres. The Lead Camp is about 860 ft (265 m) thick in the southern San Andres Mountains. At the type section, the lowermost 85 ft (26 m) contain Millerella cf. M. marblensis Thompson. The overlying 188 ft (56 m) of rocks contain Fusulinella aff. F. devexa Thompson and other species of Fusulinella. These fusulinids indicate deposition during Atokan time. About 12 mi south, in Little San Nicholas Canyon, where the Lead Camp is about 320 ft (98 m) thick, fusulinids transitional between Fusulinella and Beedeina are present 228 ft (70 m) above the base. These specimens are poorly preserved, but they suggest that the boundary between Atokan and Des Moinesian faunas in Little San Nicholas Canyon may be stratigraphically near this horizon. Rocks at the type section are overlain by about 100 ft (32 m) of non-fusulinid-bearing limestone and shale. The remaining interval, to within about 125 ft (38 m) of the top of the formation, contains an assemblage of the fusulinid genera Beedeina and Wedekindellina, with strongly fluted specimens of Beedeina in the upper part. These fusulinids indicate deposition during Des Moinesian time. The uppermost limestone bed in the Lead Camp contains Triticites aff. T. nebraskensis Thompson, which indicates deposition during early Missourian time. In summary, the Lead Camp Limestone embraces the fusulinid zones of Fusulinella and Beedeina, and the lowermost part of the zone of Triticites. If the basal beds of the Lead Camp are of Morrowan age, then the zones of Millerella

and Profusulinella may also be represented. Deposition of the Lead Camp took place during Morrowan (?), Atokan, Des Moinesian, and earliest Missourian time. Northern San Andres Mountains The Lead Camp Limestone generally thins toward the north in the San Andres Mountains, and both basal and upper contacts of the limestone cross time lines; the lower contact is younger, and the upper contact is older than to the south. Clastic rocks interfinger with both the basal and upper parts of the Lead Camp. In general the Lead Camp is no more than 450 ft (137 m) thick in the northern part of the range, but locally near Sheep Mountain it thickens to about 850 ft (260 m). A mappable clastic unit is present beneath the Lead Camp in the northern San Andres Mountains and it has been called the Sandia Formation (Bachman and Harbour, 1970). In the northern part of the San Andres Mountains, fusulinids in the Lead Camp comprise the genera Beedeina and Wedekindellina. The entire formation is referred to the zone of Beedeina and is of Des Moinesian age. Fusulinids have not been reported from the underlying clastic portion of the Pennsylvanian. CORRELATION OF LEAD CAMP LIMESTONE Franklin Mountains, West Texas and New Mexico Rocks of Pennsylvanian age in the Franklin Mountains have been called the Magdalena Formation and divided into four members (Nelson, 1940; Harbour, 1972). These are, in ascending order, the La Tuna, Berino, Bishop Cap, and an upper unnamed member. Of these, the lower part of the La Tuna includes rocks somewhat older than the Lead Camp Limestone, but the upper part of the La Tuna, as well as the Berino and Bishop Cap, are general time equivalents of the Lead Camp. Lithologically, these members in the Franklin Mountains differ considerably from the Lead Camp. Shale and sandstone are absent in the La Tuna, and both the La Tuna and the Bishop Cap resemble the cherty limestone portion of the Lead Camp. The intervening Berino includes much shale, and a lithologic equivalent of this member appears to be absent in the Lead Camp. These three members in the Franklin Mountains are about 1,500 ft (460 m) thick as compared with 860 ft (262 m) of Lead Camp at its type section. Sacramento Mountains, New Mexico In the Sacramento Mountains there are pronounced local facies changes in the Pennsylvanian rocks. The limestone includes high percentages of bioclastic and terrigenous clastic debris. Pray (1961, p. 72) recognized that nomenclature of Pennsylvanian rock units was not well established in New Mexico and was inadequate for the purposes of his mapping. He mapped three major rock units (Pray, 1961, p. 74): the Gobbler Formation, Beeman Formation, and Holder Forma-

108 BACHMAN and MYERS tion. Pray recognized that his nomenclature was based on locally distinctive lithologies. The Gobbler and Beeman Formations of Pray are partial time equivalents of the Lead Camp at its type section (Table 1). The combined thickness of the Gobbler and Beeman Formations is about 1,600 ft (490 m). Caballo Mountains, New Mexico Rocks of Pennsylvanian age in the Caballo Mountains have been placed in the Magdalena Group and divided into three formations, in ascending order, the Red House Formation, the Nakaye Formation, and the Bar B Formation (Kelley and Silver, 1952). In their published description, the contacts are not well defined (Kelley and Silver, 1952, p. 91-94, 253-256), and these formations do not appear to be cartographic units. Faunal evidence is not available, but the two lower units, the Red House and the Nakaye, may be general time equivalents to the Lead Camp at its type section. The Red House is comprised largely of clastic sedimentary rocks, but it interfingers southward with beds of limestone and may have facies relations similar to those of the Lead Camp in the San Andres Mountains. The Nakaye Formation is similar lithologically to the Lead Camp Limestone. Manzano Mountains In the Manzano Mountains, the Sandia Formation and the Los Moyos Limestone are approximate time equivalents to the Lead Camp Limestone. The Sandia generally rests upon the eroded surface of Precambrian rocks. Locally, there are thin beds of limestone between the Sandia and the Precambrian that have been referred to the Mississippian Arroyo Penasco Formation by Armstrong (1967). The Sandia Formation, from less than 50 ft (15 m) to at least 300 ft (90 m) thick, is a sequence of conglomerate, dark-colored shale and siltstone, and a few thin, discontinuous beds of marine limestone. Many, but not all, of the clastic beds contain plant debris. The upper few feet are black calcareous shale and silty limestone that grade up into the overlying Los Moyos Limestone. Fusulinids older than those from the zone of Fusulinella have not been found in the Manzano Mountains. The youngest fusulinids from the Sandia are close to Fusulinella famula Thompson. Hence, the Sandia is referred to the zone of Fusulinella. The Los Moyos Limestone, about 600 ft (185 m) thick, is a sequence of ledge- and cliff-forming cherty marine limestone that contains minor amounts of interbedded dark-colored marine shale and light-colored sandstone, and lenses of conglomerate that may contain plant debris. The lowermost few feet of the Los Moyos locally contain species of Fusulinella that resemble F. iowensis Thompson. These beds are overlain by rocks that contain Beedeina and Wedekindellina. Beedeina novamexicana (Needham) is common in the lower half of the limestone and it is often associated with species of Wedekindellina. Near the top of the Los Moyos, rare specimens of Eowaeringella have been found. Hence, the Los Moyos is referred to the zones of Fusulinella and Beedeina, and, because of the occurrence of Eowaeringella to the lowermost part of the zone of Triticites. REFERENCES American Commission on Stratigraphic Nomenclature, 1970, Code of stratigraphic nomenclature (as amended from the 1961 code): Tulsa, Okla., Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists, 22 p. Armstrong, A. K., 1967, Biostratigraphy and carbonate facies of the Mississippian Arroyo Penasco Formation, north-central New Mexico: New Mex. Bur. Mines and Min. Res. Mem. 20, 80 p. Bachman, G. 0., 1965, Geologic map of Capitol Peak NW quadrangle, Socorro County, New Mexico: U.S. Geol. Survey Misc. Geol. Inv. Map 1-441. ----, 1967, Geology of the Mockingbird Gap quadrangle: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 594-J, 43 p. Bachman, G. 0., and Harbour, R. L., 1970, Geologic map of the northern part of the San Andres Mountains, central New Mexico: U.S. Geol. Survey Misc. Geol. Inv. Map 1-600. Bachman, G. 0., and Myers, D. A., 1969, Geology of the Bear Peak area, Dona Ana County, New Mexico: U.S. Geol. Survey Bull. 1271-C, 46 p. Harbour, R. L., 1972, Geology of the northern Franklin Mountains, Texas and New Mexico: U.S. Geol. Survey Bull. 1298, 129 p. Ishi, K., 1957, On the so-called Fusulina: Japan Acad. Proc., v. 33, no. 10, p. 652-656. ----, 1958, On the phylogeny, morphology and distribution of Fusulina, Beedeina and applied fusulinid genera: Osaka City Univ., Inst. Polytechnics Jour., ser. G, v. 4, p. 29-70. Kelley, V. C., and Silver, C., 1952, Geology of the Caballo Mountains: New Mexico Univ. Pubs. Geology, no. 4, 286 p. Myers, D. A., 1973, The upper Paleozoic Madera Group in the Manzano Mountains, New Mexico: U.S. Geol. Survey Bull. 1372-F, 13 p. Nelson, L. A., 1940, Paleozoic stratigraphy of Franklin Mountains, west Texas: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 24, p. 157-172. Pray, L. C., 1961, Geology of the Sacramento Mountains escarpment: New Mex. Bur. Mines and Min. Res. Bull. 35, 144 p. Thompson, M. L., 1964, Fusulinacea, in Moore, R. C., ed., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part C, Protista 2, v. 1: Lawrence, Kansas, University of Kansas Press and Geol. Soc. America, p. C358-C436.