MICRONUTRIENTS AS STARTER AND FOLIAR APPLICATION FOR CORN AND SOYBEAN



Similar documents
Evaluation of Combination Phosphorus Sulfur Fertilizer Products for Corn Production

SULFUR AND MICRONUTRIENT RESPONSES ON CORN AND SOYBEANS George Rehm Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, St.

Evaluation of Biofertilizer and Manure Effects on Quantitative Yield of Nigella Sativa L.

Agronomic and Economic Considerations on Michigan Farms

Fertility Guidelines for Hops in the Northeast Dr. Heather Darby, University of Vermont Extension Agronomist

LAB 5 - PLANT NUTRITION. Chemical Ionic forms Approximate dry Element symbol Atomic weight Absorbed by plants tissue concentration

Sulfur Fertilization of Corn. Jeff Vetsch Univ. of Minnesota Southern Research and Outreach Center December 2013

A SOIL TESTING SERVICE FOR FARMERS IN THAILAND, USING MOBILE LABORATORIES

EFFECT OF AVAIL ON CORN PRODUCTION IN MINNESOTA

WHAT IS IN FERTILIZER OTHER THAN NUTRIENTS?

Making Urea Work in No-till

Agro-One Soil Analysis

CALCIUM AND MAGNESIUM: THE SECONDARY COUSINS George Rehm, University of Minnesota

CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC. Implementation of Sustainable Agricultural Initiatives

Calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) are secondary nutrients, but they are

FERTILIZER GUIDELINES FOR AGRONOMIC CROPS IN MINNESOTA

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. W. David Smith Extension Crop Science Specialist Tobacco

Understanding the. Soil Test Report. Client and Sample Identification

Correcting Iron Deficiencies in Soybean with Foliar Iron Fertilizer

Grain Sorghum Production South and Southwest Texas

The Basics of Fertilizer Calculations for Greenhouse Crops Joyce G. Latimer, Extension Specialist, Greenhouse Crops; Virginia Tech

Nutrient Deficiencies

SOIL TEST INTERPRETATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS HANDBOOK

Irrigation Scheduling on Small Grains using AZSCHED for Windows - Safford Agricultural Center, 2003

Nitrogen uptake in cotton+greengram intercropping system as influenced by integrated nutrient management

N-P-K FERTILIZERS. by M.L. Vitosh Extension Specialist, Crop and Soil Sciences

Fertilization of Strawberries in Florida 1

Plant Physiology Critical Stages in the Life of a Corn Plant

Determining nutrient needs

Phosphorus use efficiency, grain yield, and quality of triticale and durum wheat under irrigated conditions

Heavy Metals in Cocoa

Potash application methods

SOIL FERTILITY MANAGEMENT BASICS. Organic Soil Amendments and Fertilizers

EVALUATION OF NUTRISPHERE-N AS A SOIL NITRIFICATION AND UREASE INHIBITOR

Yield Response of Corn to Plant Population in Indiana

PHOSPHORUS, POTASSIUM, AND MINOR ELEMENT FERTILIZATION

Soybean roulette: improving the odds for maximizing soybean yields

Fred Below & Adam Henninger. Crop Physiology Laboratory Department of Crop Sciences University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Soil and Leaf Tissue Testing for Commercial Citrus Production 1

igrow Soybeans Best Management Practices for Soybean Production

Soils should be warm and moist for at least a week before SME sampling. Chilean may not be allowed at all after 2012

POTASSIUM. Functions of Potassium in Plants. Potassium Deficiency Symptoms

Hail Damaged Corn and Soybean

Managing of Annual Winter Forages in Southwest Texas

CORN IS GROWN ON MORE ACRES OF IOWA LAND THAN ANY OTHER CROP.

Adapt-N Guided Hands-on Exercise

Effect Of Amino Acids On Plants

Fertilizing hops improves yield and quality by

by Keith R. Baldwin technical language, formulas, and mathematics.

Is Lower Priced Urea a Bargain?

Sulfur deficiency in corn Jim Camberato, Stephen Maloney, and Shaun Casteel 1 Agronomy Department, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN

ENERGY IN FERTILIZER AND PESTICIDE PRODUCTION AND USE

Introduction. Introduction Nutritional Requirements. Six Major Classes of Nutrients. Water 12/1/2011. Regional Hay School -- Bolivar, MO 1

Design of Control System for Measurement of Ph and EC of Fertilizer Solution

Remote Sensing Applications for Precision Agriculture

The Basic Humic Acid Products

Salinity Management and Soil Amendments for Southwestern Pecan Orchards

Soil Sampling for Nutrient Management

Managing Soil ph and Crop Nutrients

Sugarcane Plant Nutrient Diagnosis 1

Understanding ph management and plant nutrition Part 5: Choosing the best fertilizer

Measuring Soil Moisture for Irrigation Water Management

The High Plains Dairy Conference does not support one product over another and any mention herein is meant as an example, not an endorsement.

NO-TILL AND NITROGEN FIXING INOCULANTS

What Is Humic Acid? Where Does It Come From?

ennessee is one of the top livestock producing states in the country. Much of the livestock in Tennessee is raised by smaller-scale, parttime

The Relationship Between Grain Yield and Silage Yield in Field Corn in Northern Illinois INTRODUCTION

Worksheet for Calculating Biosolids Application Rates in Agriculture

College of Agricultural Sciences Agricultural Research and Cooperative Extension

Irrigation Water for Greenhouses and Nurseries

NITROGEN MANAGEMENT IMPACTS ON WHEAT YIELD AND PROTEIN. Steve Orloff, Steve Wright and Mike Ottman 1 ABSTRACT

GROUNDWATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT CONTROLS

Chapter 5 Foliar Testing and Sampling in Berry Crops, Visual Symptoms of Deficiencies - Dr. Marvin Pritts, Cornell University

Fertilizer. Recommendations Guide. EC750 September Cooperative Extension Service South Dakota State University U.S. Department of Agriculture

Forest Nursery Notes Summer 2009

Simplifying Soil Test Interpretations for Turf Professionals

Water Quality Management for Greenhouse Production

Land Application of Drilling Fluids: Landowner Considerations

Sequential cropping of Vertisols in the Ethiopian highlands using a broadbed-and-furrow system

Federal Crop Insurance RISK MANAGEMENT. Chris Eddy Dell s Insurance Agency

Advanced Soil Organic Matter Management

Metal Ion + EDTA Metal EDTA Complex

Fertility Management and Calibration Evaluations on Upland and Pima Cotton

EFFECTS OF A SOIL FULVIC ACID ON THE GROWTH AND NUTRIENT CONTENT OF CUCUMBER (CUCUMIS SA TIVUS) PLANTS. by B. S. RAUTHAN and M.

RELATIVE PERFORMANCE OF SUGAR BEET VARIETIES UNDER THREE PLANT DENSITIES IN NEWLY RECLAIMED SOIL INTRODUCTION

MAINE SOIL TESTING SERVICE

Coffee Growing Basics: Fertilizer, Disease, Insects. HC Skip Bittenbender Extension Specialist CTAHR/UH

You d be mad not to bet on this horse.

Managing the Root Zone in Soilless Culture

Spectrum Analytic Inc. FERTILIZING GRAPES

Agricultural Extension Service The University of Tennessee PB1637

Soybean Growth and Development

TRENDS IN BULK BLENDING WORLD WIDE

Transcription:

MICRONUTRIENTS AS STARTER AND FOLIAR APPLICATION FOR CORN AND SOYBEAN Nathan D. Mueller and Dorivar A. Ruiz Diaz Dep. of Agronomy, Kansas State University Abstract Corn and soybean production under high yield environments can benefit from the combined use of starter and foliar fertilization, including macro and micronutrients. The objective of this study was to evaluate corn and soybean response to starter fertilizers in combination with foliar application of macro and micronutrients to maximize yields. Experiments were conducted in 21 and 211 at two locations for corn and soybean under irrigation. Starter and foliar fertilizer treatments were applied in a factorial arrangement with combinations of N, P, K and micronutrients Fe, Mn, Zn, B, and Cu. Soil samples were collected from each location with samples from each small plot. Tissue samples were collected from each plot before foliar fertilizer application and analyzed for the macro and micronutrients included in this study. Plant population, plant height, and grain yield were measured. One location in 21 (Clay Center) showed potential yield limitations due to population below optimum for both corn and soybean. At both locations, chloride, Zn and Cu showed significant increase in concentration in corn tissue with starter application. Chloride was not part of any treatment but was present in the starter fertilizer used for the study. Early corn biomass was also increased significantly at both locations during 21 with the use of starters. Corn and soybean grain yield response varied by location, with significant yield increase for soybean with starter application of NPK+micros at Clay Center. However others locations for corn and soybean show no statistically significant effect of treatments in 21. Introduction The use of alternative fertilizer application strategies to achieve maximum yields and enhance nutrient use efficiency has been proposed for decades. Often a combination of broadcast and band applications can provide optimum nutrient uptake in low fertility/low soil test conditions. However, under current reduced tillage systems with high yield potential, broadcast nutrients can remain on the soil surface, limiting root contact, or where the soil surface may have been compacted through wheel traffic. When these conditions become more severe, alternative fertilizer application methods and inclusion of micronutrients should be considered. With the increase in corn and soybean yields due to important genetic improvements, demand for nutrients has also increased. It is likely that the increased utilization of reduced tillage systems and some soil conditions such as high soil ph found in large areas of the Great Plains may decrease the plant-availability of some macro and micronutrients. Previous work by Gordon (28) showed that direct application of P and K to soybeans can have a significant impact on soybean yield, with average increases as high as 34 bu/acre. However, further studies are needed to investigate starter and foliar applications with other nutrients to maximize yields in soybean. On the other hand, in corn, fertilizer placed in a band near the seed at planting has frequently North Central Extension-Industry Soil Fertility Conference. 211. Vol. 27. Des Moines, IA. Page 36

shown positive effects on yield (Rehm and Lamb, 29). Furthermore, this approach can be especially valuable under conditions of reduced tillage (Kovar and Mallarino, 21; Haq and Mallarino 2). In addition, foliar fertilization could in some cases increase nutrient supply at early growth stages when the root system is not well developed. Thus, foliar application of nutrients to corn and soybean in addition to starter fertilizer can help to overcome possible limitations in crop nutrient uptake and increase nutrient use efficiency and yields. Some soil conditions such as high soil ph and low organic matter may contribute to decrease the supply of micronutrients to crops. Increased nutrient demands from more intensive cropping practices and high yielding potential crops may also require additional micronutrient for optimum yield. Supplementary foliar application of N, P, K, and micronutrients can help to enhance crop yields under these conditions. Consequently, there is an increasing interest from producers about the potential benefits of foliar application of nutrients and the use of micronutrients as complement of their fertilization programs to maximize yields. The overall objective of this study was to evaluate crop response to starter fertilizers in combination with foliar application of macro and micronutrients to maximize corn and soybean yields. Specific objectives include (1) assessment of corn and soybean grain yield and early growth response to starter application of fertilizers and (2) compare responses with and without additional foliar fertilizers. (3) Verify potential soil parameters that could be related to responses to starter and foliar applied macro and micronutrients. (4) Evaluate tissue testing as a diagnostic tool to explain responses to foliar and starter macro and micronutrient application. Materials and Methods The experiment was conducted in 2 locations (Scandia and Clay Center) during 21 and 2 locations (Scandia and Rossville) during 211. Each location has both corn and soybean. Studies were located under high yield potential irrigated conditions. The field studies consisted of smallplot field research of six rows wide by 5 feet in length. Macronutrients treatments included N, P, and K, and micronutrients included Fe, Mn, Zn, B, and Cu. Starter fertilizer treatments and foliar treatments were applied in various combinations in a factorial arrangement. Three starter treatments (none, N, P, K only, and N, P, K + micros) were combined with three foliar treatments (none, N, P, K only, and N, P, K + micros) for a total of nine treatment combinations. Starter fertilizers were applied near the seed using a dribble band placement. The foliar fertilizer application was made around the V6-V8 growth stage for corn, and for soybean around the V5- V7 stage. The procedure for fertilizer application simulated procedures commonly used by producers. Foliar fertilizer was diluted into water and applied with a hand-held CO2-powered sprayer. Fertilizer used for starter application was a 4-1-1 formulation, micronutrients Zn, Cu, and Mn were chelated EDTA. Iron was a chelated HEDTA, and B was derived from boric acid. Foliar N, P, K was applied using a 1-1-1 fertilizer formulation. Soil samples at the -6 inch depth were collected from each individual plot and analyzed for routine soil properties and soil properties that can help identify the likelihood of response to foliar and starter treatments. Analysis included soil organic matter, soil test phosphorus, soil test potassium, and soil ph by standard methods in addition to micronutrients Fe, Mn, Zn, B, and Cu. North Central Extension-Industry Soil Fertility Conference. 211. Vol. 27. Des Moines, IA. Page 37

Tissue samples were collected 1-3 days before foliar treatment for total N, P, K, and micronutrients. At harvest, yield was recorded for each plot and a grain samples were collected. Statistical analysis was completed with the GLIMMIX procedure in SAS 9.2 (SAS Institute, 2). Plant population was used as covariate in the analysis. Results and Discussion Average soil test levels are presented in Tables 1 and 2 for years 21 and 211. Data presented for crop response to treatments correspond to 21 only (Clay Center and Scandia sites). Plant population below-optimum for the Clay Center location (data not shown) indicated potential limitation for grain yield in corn and soybean. At both locations, chloride, Fe and Cu showed significant increase in concentration in corn tissue with starter application (Fig 1 and 2). Chloride was not originally part of a fertilizer treatment; however one of the starter fertilizer source (4-1- 1) included some chloride. In Kansas, corn (as well as wheat and sorghum) can show yield increase to the application of Cl. Zinc in corn was also significantly increased in Scandia only. Early corn biomass increased significantly at both locations with the use of starter fertilizer (Fig 3). Starter and foliar fertilizer did not significantly change corn grain yield at either location in 21 (Table 3). Soybean yield was not significantly different among any of the treatments at Scandia. At Clay Center, when no foliar fertilizer was applied, NPK+miconutrients starter fertilizer increased yield. However, when no starter fertilizer was applied, NPK+miconutrients foliar fertilizer decreased yield at the Clay Center location. The NPK+miconutrients foliar product did cause some moderate leaf burn, and this may explain some of the lower yield. Additional years and sites are required to provide a more in-depth analysis and summary for specific nutrients associated with crop response, including the effect or foliar fertilization and micronutrients for corn and soybean in combination with starter fertilizer. References Gordon, B. 28. Maximizing irrigated soybean yields in the Great Plains. Better Crops. Vol. 92. No 2. pp 6-7. Haq M.U. and A.P. Mallarino. 2. Soybean yield and nutrient composition as affected by early season foliar fertilization. Agron. J., 93, 122 1226. Kovar, J.L., and A.P. Mallarino. 21. Starter fertilizer formulations and placement for reduced tillage corn. Fluid Forum Proc. 18:188 194. Rehm G.W. and J.A. Lamb. 29. Corn response to fluid fertilizers placed near the seed at planting. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 73:1427-1434. SAS Institute. 2. The SAS system for Windows. Release 8.1. SAS Institute, SAS Inst., Cary, NC. North Central Extension-Industry Soil Fertility Conference. 211. Vol. 27. Des Moines, IA. Page 38

Table 1. Average soil test values for Scandia and Clay Center in 21. Corn Soybean Soil test Scandia Clay Center Scandia Clay Center ph 6.7 7.4 7. 7.1 P (ppm) 11 114 11 34 K (ppm) 462 389 48 255 Zn (ppm) 1.4 2.5 1.1 4.1 Fe (ppm) 31 21 26 16 Mn (ppm) 23 4.9 17 9 Cu (ppm).88.36.86.33 B (ppm).54.31.67.33 Table 2. Average soil test values for Scandia and Rossville in 211. Corn Soybean Soil test Scandia Rossville Scandia Rossville ph 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.4 P (ppm) 16 19 14 28 K (ppm) 655 243 511 19 Zn (ppm) 2.5 1.3 2. 1.4 Fe (ppm) 94 91 93 61 Mn (ppm) 78 67 85 41 Cu (ppm) 1.54 1.39 1.65.41 B (ppm).85.55.97.31 North Central Extension-Industry Soil Fertility Conference. 211. Vol. 27. Des Moines, IA. Page 39

Tissue concentration (%).6.5.4.3.2.1 Cl 5 4 3 2 1 Zn. 12 1 8 6 4 2 Cu 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Fe Figure 1. Effect of starter micronutrient application on tissue nutrient concentration in corn. Only nutrients with statistically significant (p.5) increase is shown here for the Scandia location. Tissue concentration (%).4.3.2.1 Cl 12 1 8 6 4 2 Fe. 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Cu Figure 2. Effect of starter micronutrient application on tissue nutrient concentration in corn. Only nutrients with statistically significant (p.5) increase is shown here for the Clay Center location. North Central Extension-Industry Soil Fertility Conference. 211. Vol. 27. Des Moines, IA. Page 4

25 3 Biomass (g/plant) 2 15 1 5 Scandia Biomass (g/plant) 25 2 15 1 5 Clay Center None NPK NPK + Micros None NPK NPK + Micros Figure 3. Corn early growth with starter fertilizer application in Scandia and Clay Center. Table 3. Yield response to starter and foliar treatments for corn and soybean during 21. Corn yield Soybean yield Clay Center Scandia Clay Center Scandia - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - bu/acre - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Control 229 212 57b 64 NPK 232 214 5b 64 NPK+micros 232 29 64a 65 Foliar treatments Control 232 214 58 63 NPK 232 212 59 63 NPK+micros 228 29 5 63 North Central Extension-Industry Soil Fertility Conference. 211. Vol. 27. Des Moines, IA. Page 41

PROCEEDINGS OF THE 41 st NORTH CENTRAL EXTENSION-INDUSTRY SOIL FERTILITY CONFERENCE Volume 27 November 16-17, 211 Holiday Inn Airport Des Moines, IA Program Chair: Peter Scharf University of Missouri Columbia, MO 65211 (573) 882-777 scharfp@missouri.edu Published by: International Plant Nutrition Institute 231 Research Park Way, Suite 126 Brookings, SD 576 (65) 692-628 Web page: www.ipni.net