ZAG BANK BASEL II & III PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES. December 31, 2014



Similar documents
Basel II, Pillar 3 Disclosure for Sun Life Financial Trust Inc.

BASEL III PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES. March 31, 2014

Basel III Pillar 3 and Leverage Ratio disclosures of ALTERNA BANK

The Northern Trust Company, Canada Basel III Pillar lll Disclosure as at December 31, 2015

COMPUTERSHARE TRUST COMPANY OF CANADA BASEL III PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES

CANADIAN TIRE BANK. BASEL PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES December 31, 2014 (unaudited)

Rogers Bank Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures

Rogers Bank Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures

DISCLOSURE ON CAPITAL ADEQUACY & MARKET DISCIPLINE (CAMD)

First Quarter Report January 31, 2015

Controls and accounting policies

Basel II Pillar 3 Disclosures As at December 31, 2012

Capital G Bank Limited. Interim Pillar 3 Disclosures 30th June, 2012

Close Brothers Group plc

Standard Chartered Bank (Thai) PCL & its Financial Business Group Pillar 3 Disclosures 30 June 2015

TD Bank Financial Group Q4/08 Guide to Basel II

State Farm Bank, F.S.B.

Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

Bank of Queensland Limited

Annual Disclosures (Banks, Foreign Bank Branches, Federally Regulated Trust and Loan Companies, and Cooperative Credit Associations)

BASEL III PILLAR 3 CAPITAL ADEQUACY AND RISKS DISCLOSURES AS AT 30 SEPTEMBER 2015

RISK MANAGEMENT. Risk governance. Risk management framework MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS RISK MANAGEMENT

YEARENDED31DECEMBER2013 RISKMANAGEMENTDISCLOSURES

Julian Hodge Bank Limited. Pillar 3 disclosures as at 31 October 2012

2016 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION Washington, D.C FORM 10 Q

18,343 18,308 3 Accumulated other comprehensive income (and other reserves)

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Goldman Sachs Bank USA Annual Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Disclosure

TD Bank Financial Group Q1/08 Guide to Basel II

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 1: Basis of Presentation

AMENDED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERIOD ENDED JULY 31, (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

Consolidated Financial Statements

RISK MANAGEMENT. Risk management framework. Risk governance

Supplementary Financial Information

MASUPARIA GOLD CORPORATION

Pillar 3 Disclosures. (OCBC Group As at 31 December 2014)

Pillar 3 Disclosures. Principality Group 31 December 2008

GENWORTH MI CANADA INC.

PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES 2009

MCAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF OPERATIONS

BALANCE SHEET HIGHLIGHTS

Capital Market Services UK Limited Pillar 3 Disclosure

Consolidated Financial Statements

ICAAP Report Q2 2015

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2013

Risk Management. Risk Management Overview. Credit Risk

THE EMPIRE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Charles Schwab Bank Annual Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Disclosure

Basel III Pillar 3 CAPITAL ADEQUACY AND RISK DISCLOSURES AS AT 30 SEPTEMBER 2014

Sainsbury s Bank plc Pillar 3 Disclosures 2013

Nova Scotia Fisheries and Aquaculture Loan Board. Financial Statements March 31, 2015 (in thousands of dollars)

QUINSAM CAPITAL CORPORATION INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THIRD QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 (UNAUDITED AND EXPRESSED IN CANADIAN DOLLARS)

Bank of America NA Dublin Branch Market Discipline. Basel II - Disclosures

Consolidated Financial Statements. caisse centrale Desjardins

Quarterly Financial Supplement - 1Q 2016

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Net Stable Funding Ratio disclosure standards

Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements of. Canada Pension Plan Investment Board

Saxo Capital Markets CY Limited

CEMATRIX CORPORATION Consolidated Financial Statements (in Canadian dollars) September 30, 2015

Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements of. Canada Pension Plan Investment Board

ICAAP Required Capital Assessment, Quantification & Allocation. Anand Borawake, VP, Risk Management, TD Bank anand.borawake@td.com

FOREX Bank AB. Annual information about capital adequacy and risk management 1

Condensed Interim Financial Statements Fiscal 2013 First Quarter (Unaudited) For the three months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011

Dumfries Mutual Insurance Company Financial Statements For the year ended December 31, 2010

1) What kind of risk on settlements is covered by 'Herstatt Risk' for which BCBS was formed?

Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements NOBLE IRON INC. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 (Unaudited)

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision

SUPERVISION GUIDELINE NO. 9 ISSUED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ACT 1995 (NO. 1 OF 1995) RISK MANAGEMENT

Equita SIM SpA publishes this Public Disclosure on its website

Capital Regime for Regulated Insurance Holding Companies and Non-Operating Life Companies

Nova Scotia Farm Loan Board. Financial Statements March 31, 2015

HOCH CAPITAL LTD PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES As at 1 February 2015

China International Capital Corporation (UK) Limited Pillar 3 Disclosure

Risk Management Programme Guidelines

EASY FOREX TRADING LTD DISCLOSURE AND MARKET DISCIPLINE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CAPITAL ADEQUACY AND THE REQUIREMENTS ON RISK MANAGEMENT

(unaudited expressed in Canadian Dollars)

MORGAN STANLEY Financial Supplement - 4Q 2015 Table of Contents

Bank Capital Adequacy under Basel III

Symbility Solutions Inc. Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) Quarter ended March 31, 2016

2015 DFAST Annual Stress Test Disclosure For Synchrony Bank, a Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of Synchrony Financial. June 26, 2015

Sunora Foods Inc. Condensed Interim Consolidated Financial Statements For the three months ended March 31, 2016 (unaudited)

Guidance on the management of interest rate risk arising from nontrading

AP4 Education Session Impairment requirements in IFRS 9 Financial Instruments

Disclosures Under BASEL III Capital Regulations For the quarter ended 31 st December, 2013

Market Risk Capital Disclosures Report. For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2013

Western Energy Services Corp. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 2015 and 2014 (Unaudited)

Pillar 3 Disclosures

Capital adequacy ratios for banks - simplified explanation and

1. Introduction Process for determining the solvency need Definitions of main risk types... 9

Argus Stockbrokers Ltd

Roche Capital Market Ltd Financial Statements 2009

MISSION VALUES. The guide has been printed by:

INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT

Jupiter Asset Management Ltd Pillar 3 Disclosures as at 31 December 2014

Symbility Solutions Inc. Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) Quarter ended June 30, 2015

Financial Statements

BA-CA Finance (Cayman) Limited UNAUDITED. Financial Statements for the six month period January 1 June 30, 2014

COACHMAN INSURANCE COMPANY. Annual Report 2013

NOVEMBER 2010 (REVISED)

Transcription:

ZAG BANK BASEL II & III PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES December 31, 2014

Zag Bank (the Bank ) is required to make certain disclosures to meet the requirements of the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Canada ("OSFI"), in particular OSFI s Pillar 3 Disclosure Requirements issued in November 2007, pursuant to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision s update on Basel II: International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards: A Revised Framework Comprehensive Version issued in June 2006. Basel II is structured around 3 pillars: Pillar 1: Minimum Capital Requirements Pillar 2: The Supervisory Review Process Pillar 3: Market Discipline Pillar 3 complements both Pillars 1 and 2, by setting disclosure requirements which will allow market participants to assess key pieces of information on the scope of application, capital, risk exposures, risk assessment processes, and hence the capital adequacy of Zag Bank. The amounts disclosed in the tables throughout are the balance sheet carrying amounts included in the financial statements of the Bank prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ( IFRS ) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (the IASB ) and using the accounting policies described therein. This report is unaudited and is reported in thousands of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise disclosed. 1. SCOPE OF APPLICATION Zag Bank (the Bank ) is a bank chartered under the Bank Act (Canada) and has its head office at Suite 120 6807 Railway Street Southeast, Calgary, Alberta, T2H 2V6. The Bank is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Desjardins Group, through Desjardins Financial Corporation Inc. ( Desjardins ), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Fédération des caisses Desjardins du Québec ultimately controlled by the Desjardins caisses. Prior to December 1, 2013, the Bank was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Western Financial Group Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Desjardins. In 2014, the Bank changed its name from Bank West to Zag Bank. The name change was approved by OSFI on July 22, 2014. The incorporating instrument of the Bank was amended in accordance with the Bank Act and the letters patent were effective on October 1, 2014. The Bank provides banking services to individuals across western Canada. The Bank is currently focused on consumer and real estate loans. The Bank offers Guaranteed Investment Certificates (GICs) through third party brokers and is a member of the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation (CDIC). 2. CAPITAL STRUCTURE The Bank is subject to regulatory capital requirements governed by OSFI, based on standards issued by the Bank for International Settlements, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). Capital requirements of the BCBS are commonly referred to as Basel III. Under Basel III, there are two tiers of capital. Tier 1 capital consists of two components: Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) and Additional Tier 1. Tier 2 capital consists of supplementary capital instruments. Total capital is defined as the sum of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital. Page 2 of 8

Common Equity Tier 1 ( CET1 ) capital includes common shares, retained earnings and accumulated other comprehensive income. CET1 capital also includes regulatory adjustments and deductions for certain items including intangible assets. The Bank currently does not hold any additional Tier 1 or Tier 2 capital instruments. Therefore, the Bank s CET1 is equal to its Tier 1 and Total regulatory capital. The capital structure of the Bank is shown in the following table: December 31, 2014 All-in Transitional (in thousands) basis basis Common shares $ 104,612 $ 104,612 Deficit (16,119) (16,119) Common Equity Tier 1 capital before regulatory adjustments 88,493 88,493 Total regulatory adjustments to Common Equity Tier 1 (3,897) (779) Common Equity Tier 1 capital $ 84,596 $ 87,714 Tier 1 capital 84,596 87,714 Total regulatory capital $ 84,596 $ 87,714 The Bank is authorized to issue an unlimited number of common shares, without par value. As at December 31, 2014, the number of issued and outstanding common shares was 104,611,511. 3. CAPITAL ADEQUACY The Bank s objective is to maintain an adequate level of capital, in line with the Bank s risk appetite, to support the Bank s activities and meet regulatory capital requirements while producing an acceptable return for its shareholder. In order to achieve this objective, the Bank has a Capital Management Framework that includes a Capital Management and Planning Policy and an Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP). The ICAAP is an integrated process that evaluates capital adequacy relative to the Bank s strategy, financial plan and risk appetite and helps set the minimum capital levels acceptable for the Bank. The Bank s capital level underscores its solvency and capacity to fully cover operating risks related to its operations while providing depositors and creditors with safeguards. The Board of Directors reviews and approves several capital-related documents on an annual basis, including the Capital Management and Planning Policy, the ICAAP, and the annual business plan. The Board s Audit and Risk Management Committee reviews the overall capital adequacy of the Bank on a quarterly basis. Senior management monitors regulatory capital ratios on a monthly basis through the Asset & Liability Committee (ALCO). Under Basel III, there are three primary regulatory capital ratios used to assess capital adequacy; Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1), Tier 1 and Total capital ratios, which are determined by dividing those capital components by Risk-weighted assets (RWA). RWA are calculated for exposures to credit risk and operational risk (and where they have significant trading activity, market risk) and added together to determine total RWA. The calculation of RWA is prescribed by OSFI. The Bank uses the Standardized Approach to calculate RWA for credit risk and the Basic Indicator Approach to account for operational risk. OSFI requires Canadian banks to meet a target CET1 ratio of 7% on an all-in basis (defined by OSFI as capital calculated to include all of the Basel III regulatory adjustments that will be required by 2019). For Tier 1 and Total capital ratios, the all-in capital targets are 8.5% and 10.5%, Page 3 of 8

respectively, effective the first quarter of 2014. OSFI may also prescribe higher capital levels on an institution-specific basis. OSFI continues to require Canadian banks to meet an assets-to-capital multiple (ACM) requirement until December 31, 2014, when it will be replaced by the Basel III leverage ratio. The ACM is calculated by dividing gross adjusted assets, including specified off-balance sheet items, by Total Capital. The components of the Bank s regulatory capital and ratios are shown in the following table: December 31, 2014 All-in Transitional (in thousands) basis basis Risk-weighted assets Credit risk $ 68,891 $ 72,008 Operational risk 19,793 19,793 Total risk-weighted assets $ 88,684 $ 91,801 Regulatory capital ratios Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio 95.4% 95.6% Tier 1 capital ratio 95.4% 95.6% Total capital ratio 95.4% 95.6% Assets-to-capital ratio 1.4X 1.4X The Bank has complied with regulatory capital requirements ratios throughout the year ended December 31, 2014. 4. CREDIT RISK Credit risk is defined as the risk of financial loss due to a borrower or counterparty failing to meet its obligations in accordance with contractual terms and is the most significant risk to the Bank. The Bank s loan portfolio accounts for the majority of its credit risk exposure. The Bank also engages in non-lending activities that may give rise to credit risk, namely the purchase of securities for the liquidity portfolio, maintaining cash and deposits with other institutions and entering into derivative transactions to manage interest rate risk exposure. The Bank s exposure to credit risk is monitored by senior management, the Credit Risk Management Committee (CRMC) and ultimately the Board of Directors. CRMC is primarily responsible for monitoring the performance and quality of the Bank s credit portfolio, reviewing and approving provision for credit loss estimates and assessing the overall adequacy of the allowance for credit losses. CRMC also establishes, implements and monitors credit risk related policies and guidelines, taking into account business objectives and the Bank s risk appetite. The credit approval process is centrally controlled with all credit requests submitted to a credit adjudication group independent of the group responsible for originating transactions. Approval authorities are delegated based on the amount of credit requested. In certain cases, credit requests must be referred to the CRMC or to the Board for approval. Credit concentration limits are established to control against adverse concentrations within portfolios. These include limits for individual borrowers, groups of related borrowers, industry sectors, geographic regions, and products. Page 4 of 8

Each commercial borrower is assigned a borrower risk rating, reflecting the Bank s assessment of the credit quality of the borrower. The borrower risk rating assigned when a facility is first authorized is re-evaluated and adjusted, if necessary, to reflect changes in the customer s financial condition or business prospects. Re-evaluation is an ongoing process, and is done in the context of general economic changes and specific industry prospects. Credit scoring is the primary basis for assessing consumer exposures and assigning borrower risk ratings. Risk ratings are reviewed on a regular and ongoing basis and are adjusted as necessary to reflect new information. Techniques used by the Bank to reduce or mitigate credit risk include credit granting practices, policies and procedures to value and manage financial and non-financial security (collateral) and active portfolio monitoring and collections activities. Security for loans is primarily non-financial and includes commercial and residential real estate, vehicles and other equipment. The Bank also maintains a liquidity portfolio consisting primarily of instruments issued by the Canadian federal government and other high quality securities. The Bank s Liquidity and Funding Management Policy requires such investments to be investment grade. Credit risk associated with deposits with other financial institutions is minimized by ensuring that funds are placed with financial institutions with strong investment grade credit ratings. The Bank s credit risk exposure arises predominantly in Western Canada. The geographic distribution of the Bank s gross loan portfolio is shown in the table below: As at December 31, 2014 Residential Business and (in thousands) mortgages Personal government Total Alberta $ 22,058 $ 34,348 $ 2,442 $ 58,848 Ontario 2,245 14,461 2,070 18,776 British Columbia 44 6,457-6,501 Manitoba 1,645 436 51 2,132 Saskatchewan 895 1,008-1,903 Other 420 1,321 2,914 4,655 $ 27,307 $ 58,031 $ 7,477 $ 92,815 The maximum credit risk exposure of the Bank in the event of other parties failing to meet their obligations is detailed below. No account is taken of any collateral held and the maximum exposure to loss is considered to be the balance sheet carrying amount. (in thousands) 2014 Financial assets, as stated in the balance sheet $ 112,959 Credit commitments - Maximum credit exposure $ 112,959 Past due loans A loan is classified as past due when the borrower has failed to make a payment by the contractual due date. Impaired loans Generally, loans on which repayment of principal or payment of interest is contractually 90 days in arrears are automatically considered impaired unless they are fully secured and in the process of collection. Loans guaranteed or insured by the Canadian government (federal or provincial) or a Page 5 of 8

Canadian government agency are classified as impaired only when payments are contractually 365 days in arrears. Specific allowances The Bank conducts ongoing monitoring of its loan portfolios and a specific allowance for credit losses is established where objective evidence of impairment exists and the Bank has determined the loan to be impaired. The specific allowance is measured as the difference between the carrying amount of the loan and the present value of estimated future cash flows including amounts recoverable under guarantees, collateral and unencumbered assets, discounted at the loan s original effective interest rate. If the carrying amount is less than the discounted cash flows, then no allowance is necessary. Collective allowance Loans which are individually assessed and not determined to be impaired are grouped on the basis of similarities in credit risk characteristics and collectively assessed for impairment using a statistical model. A collective allowance is maintained for credit losses which are inherent in the portfolio as at the reporting date, but which have not yet been specifically identified from an individual assessment of the loan. The collective allowance methodology incorporates both quantitative and qualitative factors to determine an appropriate level of the collective allowance. The quantitative factors include probability of default, exposure at default, loss given default and estimates of the time period over which losses that are present would be identified and provided for. The initial quantitative estimate of loss experience is then adjusted to reflect qualitative factors such as management s judgment on the level of impairment losses based on historical experience relative to the actual level reported at the balance sheet date, taking into consideration current portfolio credit quality trends, portfolio concentrations, risk mitigations, business, macroeconomic conditions, policy and process changes, and other related factors. The allowance for credit losses (specific and collective) represents management s best estimate of credit losses incurred in the loan portfolios. Gross outstanding loans and impaired loans, net of allowances for credit losses, by loan type, are as follows: As at December 31, 2014 Gross loans Gross loans Gross neither impaired past due but impaired Specific Collective (in thousands) nor past due not impaired loans allowances allowance Net loans Residential mortgages $ 27,307 $ - $ - $ - $ (30) $ 27,277 Personal 57,325 439 267 (191) (710) 57,130 Business and government 7,477 - - - (70) 7,407 $ 92,109 $ 439 $ 267 $ (191) $ (810) $ 91,814 The change in the Bank s allowance for credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2014 is shown in the following table: Page 6 of 8

As at December 31, 2014 Specific Collective (in thousands) allowances allowance Total Balance at beginning of year $ 222 $ 825 $ 1,047 Provision for credit losses 592 (15) 577 Write-offs (731) - (731) Recoveries 108-108 Balance at end of year $ 191 $ 810 $ 1,001 5. MARKET RISK Market risk represents the possibility of an adverse impact on earnings resulting from changes in market factors, such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, commodity prices and equity prices. The Bank does not engage in trading and has no material exposure to foreign exchange risk, commodity risk or equity risk. The Bank s primary source of market risk is structural interest rate risk in the banking book. Structural interest rate risk in the banking book refers to the risk to net interest income that arises from differences in the maturities or re-pricing dates of assets and liabilities. Interest rate risk is managed in accordance with Board-approved policies and limits, which are set according to the documented risk appetite of the Bank and designed to control the potential negative impact of interest rate changes on the Bank s earnings and capital. The earnings limit measures the effect of various interest rate shock scenarios on the Bank s net interest income over a 12-month horizon (Earnings at Risk or EaR ). The capital limit measures the impact of various interest rate shock scenarios on the present value of the Bank s net assets (Equity Value at Risk or EVaR ). The Bank s policy also contains a duration gap limit (the difference between the duration of assets and the duration of liabilities) which measures the sensitivity of the market value of assets and liabilities to changes in interest rates. The Bank s policy sets overall limits on EVaR and EaR based on immediate and sustained ±100 basis points parallel shifts of the yield curve. Responsibility for oversight of the structural interest rate risk management process has been delegated by the Board to the ALCO. ALCO meets regularly to review the Bank s interest rate risk profile and provide strategic direction for the management of structural interest rate risk within the risk appetite framework. Based on the Bank s interest rate positions, it is estimated that an immediate and sustained 100 basis point increase in interest rates would decrease net interest income over the next 12 months by $72. It is estimated that an immediate and sustained 100 basis point decrease in interest rates would increase net interest income over the next 12 months by $84. 6. OPERATIONAL RISK Operational risk, which is inherent in all business activities, is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events. Operational risk includes legal risk, but excludes strategic and reputational risk. The impact of operational risk may include financial loss, loss of competitive position, or regulatory enforcement actions, among others. The Bank uses the Basic Indicator Approach to calculate RWA for operational risks. Page 7 of 8

7. REMUNERATION Zag Bank remuneration is based on both business and individual specific performance objectives and is structured to incentivise employees to meet strategic business objectives in a manner that is compliant with the Bank s Board-approved risk appetite and applicable governing legislation. The Bank s compensation structure is overseen by the Compensation Committee of the Bank s Board of Directors ( CC ). The Committee is comprised of three or more directors, with the majority being independent, as determined by the Board, none of whom shall be an officer or employee of the Bank. The framework of the Bank s compensation program consists of base salary and a general incentive plan. Base salary is reviewed for all employees annually and as required by market conditions. The Bank s general incentive plan is paid to eligible employees annually if threshold goals are achieved. The general incentive targets are expressed as a percentage of base salary determined by position and level within the organization. The Committee has been delegated the responsibility of reviewing and approving the Bank s general incentive plan. For the year ended December 31, the compensation of the Bank s key management personnel (includes the CEO & President and Vice-Presidents) was as follows: (in thousands) 2014 Salaries and short-term benefits $ 1,289 Post-employment benefits $ 75 1,364 Page 8 of 8