Hypertension Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension

Similar documents
Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes

Guidelines for the management of hypertension in patients with diabetes mellitus

ESH Summer School Preliminary Program

EUROASPIRE II. European Action on Secondary and Primary Prevention through Intervention to Reduce Events

ADVANCE: a factorial randomised trial of blood pressure lowering and intensive glucose control in 11,140 patients with type 2 diabetes

2016 PQRS OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: CLAIMS, REGISTRY

HYPERTENSION ASSOCIATED WITH RENAL DISEASES

Hypertension Guideline V4

Diabetic nephropathy is detected clinically by the presence of persistent microalbuminuria or proteinuria.

Case Study 6: Management of Hypertension

ADULT HYPERTENSION PROTOCOL STANFORD COORDINATED CARE

DISCLOSURES RISK ASSESSMENT. Stroke and Heart Disease -Is there a Link Beyond Risk Factors? Daniel Lackland, MD

Absolute cardiovascular disease risk

2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension

Understanding diabetes Do the recent trials help?

SUMMARY OF CHANGES TO QOF 2015/16 - ENGLAND CLINICAL

Absolute cardiovascular disease risk management

Absolute cardiovascular disease risk assessment

2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension

2007 Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension

For more information

PHARMACOLOGICAL Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation STROKE RISK ASSESSMENT SCORES Vs. BLEEDING RISK ASSESSMENT SCORES.

Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) Principal Results

Cardiovascular disease physiology. Linda Lowe-Krentz Bioscience in the 21 st Century October 14, 2011

ECG may be indicated for patients with cardiovascular risk factors

Main Effect of Screening for Coronary Artery Disease Using CT

High Blood Cholesterol

Hypertension Guidelines

Scottish Diabetes Survey Scottish Diabetes Survey Monitoring Group

HeartScore Web - based version users guide TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1. Preamble Benefits of using HeartScore Accessing HeartScore...

Medical management of CHF: A New Class of Medication. Al Timothy, M.D. Cardiovascular Institute of the South

Summary of QOF indicators

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE ON THE EVALUATION OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE PREVENTION

Isabella Sudano & Franco Muggli

Diabetes and the Kidneys

Drug Treatment in Type 2 Diabetes with Hypertension

High Blood Pressure and Your Kidneys

Treating AF: The Newest Recommendations. CardioCase presentation. Ethel s Case. Wayne Warnica, MD, FACC, FACP, FRCPC

Palpitations & AF. Richard Grocott Mason Consultant Cardiologist THH NHS Foundation Trust & Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust

PRESCRIBING GUIDELINES FOR LIPID LOWERING TREATMENTS for SECONDARY PREVENTION

MANAGEMENT OF LIPID DISORDERS: IMPLICATIONS OF THE NEW GUIDELINES

Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults Based on the Report from the Panel Members Appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC8)

Atrial Fibrillation An update on diagnosis and management

Secondary Stroke Prevention Luke Bradbury, MD 10/4/14 Fall WAPA Conferfence

COMMITTEE FOR HUMAN MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CHMP) DRAFT GUIDELINE ON THE EVALUATION OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE PREVENTION

GENERAL HEART DISEASE KNOW THE FACTS

DRUG UTILIZATION EVALUATION OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS IN DIABETIC PATIENTS WITH CKD

Scottish Diabetes Survey

2013 ACO Quality Measures

SPECIALTY : CARDIOLOGY CLINICAL PROBLEM: HEART FAILURE

2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Athersclerotic Risk

Metabolic Syndrome Overview: Easy Living, Bitter Harvest. Sabrina Gill MD MPH FRCPC Caroline Stigant MD FRCPC BC Nephrology Days, October 2007

Stroke: Major Public Health Burden. Stroke: Major Public Health Burden. Stroke: Major Public Health Burden 5/21/2012

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Algorithm. Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Algorithm Page 1

Diabetic Nephropathy

Guideline for Microalbuminuria Screening

AVAILABILITY AND ACCESSIBILITY OF CARDIAC REHABILITATION SERVICES IN LOW- AND MIDDLE-INCOME COUNTRIES QUESTIONNAIRE

RATE VERSUS RHYTHM CONTROL OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: SPECIAL CONSIDERATION IN ELDERLY. Charles Jazra

JNC-8 Blood Pressure and ACC/AHA Cholesterol Guideline Updates. January 30, 2014

UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM AND UNIVERSITY OF YORK HEALTH ECONOMICS CONSORTIUM (NICE EXTERNAL CONTRACTOR) Health economic report on piloted indicator(s)

High Blood Pressure and Chronic Kidney Disease. For People With CKD Stages 1 4

The Hypertension Treatment Center

Journal Club: Niacin in Patients with Low HDL Cholesterol Levels Receiving Intensive Statin Therapy by the AIM-HIGH Investigators

Risk Factors of chronic complex co-morbidities. Aldo Pietro Maggioni, MD ANMCO Research Center Firenze, Italy

Scottish Diabetes Survey Scottish Diabetes Survey Monitoring Group

High Blood Pressure (Essential Hypertension)

Section 8: Clinical Exercise Testing. a maximal GXT?

ROLE OF LDL CHOLESTEROL, HDL CHOLESTEROL AND TRIGLYCERIDES IN THE PREVENTION OF CORONARY HEART DISEASE AND STROKE

CHAPTER V DISCUSSION. normal life provided they keep their diabetes under control. Life style modifications

The Canadian Association of Cardiac

Perioperative Cardiac Evaluation

International Task Force for Prevention Of Coronary Heart Disease. Clinical management of risk factors. coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke

Clinical Quality Measure Crosswalk: HEDIS, Meaningful Use, PQRS, PCMH, Beacon, 10 SOW

Case study 28: Managing hypertension in diabetes

ATRIAL FIBRILLATION (RATE VS RHYTHM CONTROL)

Managing diabetes in the post-guideline world. Dr Helen Snell Nurse Practitioner PhD, FCNA(NZ)

Cardiovascular risk assessment: Audit findings from a nurse clinic a quality improvement initiative

Drug treatment of elevated blood pressure

Hypertension and Heart Failure Medications. Dr William Dooley

DERBYSHIRE JOINT AREA PRESCRIBING COMMITTEE (JAPC) MANAGEMENT of Atrial Fibrillation (AF)

CME Test for AMDA Clinical Practice Guideline. Diabetes Mellitus

Measure #236 (NQF 0018): Controlling High Blood Pressure National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care

MISSING DATA ANALYSIS AMONG PATIENTS IN THE PINNACLE REGISTRY

HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE AND YOUR KIDNEYS

Therapeutic Approach in Patients with Diabetes and Coronary Artery Disease

3/2/2010 Post CABG R h e bili a i tat on Ahmed Elkerdany Professor o f oof C ardiac Cardiac Surgery Ain Shams University 1

Prognostic impact of uric acid in patients with stable coronary artery disease

Listen to your heart: Good Cardiovascular Health for Life

Hypertension and Diabetes

High Blood pressure and chronic kidney disease

Prescription Pattern of Anti Hypertensive Drugs used in Hypertensive Patients with Associated Type2 Diabetes Mellitus in A Tertiary Care Hospital

Use of Glycated Hemoglobin and Microalbuminuria in the Monitoring of Diabetes Mellitus

Transcription:

ESSENTIAL MESSAGES FROM ESC GUIDELINES Committee for Practice Guidelines To improve the quality of clinical practice and patient care in Europe Hypertension Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension For more information

2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension* The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Chairperson ESC Professor Robert Fagard Hypertension & Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Unit KU Leuven University Herestraat 49 3000 Leuven, Belgium Tel: +32 16 348 707 Fax: +32 16 343 766 Email: robert.fagard@uzleuven.be Chairperson ESH Professor Giuseppe Mancia Centro di Fisiologia Clinica e Ipertensione Via F. Sforza, 35 20121 Milano, Italy Tel: +39 039 233 3357 Fax: +39 039 322 274 Email: giuseppe.mancia@unimib.it Authors/Task Force Members Krzysztof Narkiewicz (Section coordinator) (Poland), Josep Redon (Section coordinator) (Spain), Alberto Zanchetti (Section coordinator) (Italy), Michael Böhm (Germany), Thierry Christiaens (Belgium), Renata Cifkova, (Czech Republic), Guy De Backer (Belgium), Anna Dominiczak (UK), Maurizio Galderisi (Italy), Diederick E. Grobbee (Netherlands), Tiny Jaarsma (Sweden), Paulus Kirchhof (Germany/UK), Sverre E. Kjeldsen (Norway), Stéphane Laurent (France), Athanasios J. Manolis (Greece), Peter M. Nilsson (Sweden), Luis Miguel Ruilope (Spain), Roland E. Schmieder (Germany), Per Anton Sirnes (Norway), Peter Sleight (UK), Margus Viigimaa (Estonia), Bernard Waeber (Switzerland), Faiez Zannad (France).. Other ESC entities having participated in the development of this document: Association: Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). Working Groups: Hypertension and the Heart, Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. Councils: Cardiovascular Primary Care, Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions, Cardiology Practice. ESC Staff: Veronica Dean, Catherine Despres, Karine Villanese - Sophia Antipolis, France. *Adapted from the ESH/ESC Guidelines for Management of Arterial Hypertension (Eur Heart J 2013;34:2159-219-doi:10.1093/ eurheartj/eht151).

ESSENTIAL MESSAGES FROM 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension* Table of contents Section 1 - Take home messages Section 2 - Major gaps in evidence European Heart Journal 2013;34:2159-219-doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht151

Take home messages 1 - Total cardiovascular risk stratification Decisions on management of the hypertensive patient depend on the initial level of total cardiovascular (CV) risk. The stratification of total CV risk in different categories is based on BP category, CV risk factors, asymptomatic organ damage and presence of diabetes, symptomatic CV disease or chronic kidney disease. The classification in low, moderate, high and very risk refers to the 10-year risk of CV mortality as defined in the 2012 Joint CVD Prevention Guidelines. Figure 1 Stratification of total CV risk in categories of low, moderate, high and very high risk according to SBP and DBP and prevalence of RFs, asymptomatic OD, diabetes, CKD stage or symptomatic CVD. Subjects with a high normal office but a raised out-of-office BP (masked hypertension) have a CV risk in the hypertension range. Subjects with a high office BP but normal out-of-office BP (white-coat hypertension), particularly if there is no diabetes, OD, CVD or CKD, have lower risk than sustained hypertension for the same office BP. Other risk factors, asymptomatic organ damage, or disease High normal SBP 130 139 or DBP 85 89 Blood Pressure (mmhg) Grade 1 HT SBP 140 159 or DBP 90 99 Grade 2 HT SBP 160 179 or DBP 100 109 Grade 3 HT SBP 180 or DBP 110 No other RF Low risk Moderate risk High risk 1 2 RF Low risk Moderate risk Moderate to high risk High risk 3 RF OD, CKD stage 3 or diabetes Symptomatic CVD, CKD stage 4 or diabetes with OD/RFs Low to Moderate risk Moderate to high risk Moderate to high risk High risk High Risk High risk High risk High to very high risk Very high risk Very high risk Very high risk Very high risk BP = blood pressure; CV = cardiovascular; CVD = cardiovascular disease; CKD = chronic kidney disease; DBP = diastolic blood pressure; HT = hypertension; OD = organ damage; RF = risk factor; SBP = systolic blood pressure. Risk factors include age, male sex, smoking, dyslipidaemia, glucose intolerance, obesity and family history of premature CVD. Asymptomatic organ damage mainly involves left ventricular hypertrophy, evidence of vascular damage and microalbuminuria. 2 - Diagnostic evaluation The initial evaluation of a patient with hypertension should: 1) confirm the diagnosis of hypertension; 2) detect causes of secondary hypertension; and 3) assess CV risk, organ damage, and concomitant clinical conditions. This calls for BP measurement, medical history including family history, physical examination, laboratory investigations, and further diagnostic tests. Some of the investigations are needed in all patients, others only in specific patient groups. 2a. Blood pressure measurement Office blood pressure Conventional office BP measurement by use of a validated device is the gold standard for screening, diagnosis and management of hypertension. Hypertension is defined as systolic BP 140 mmhg and/or diastolic BP 90 mmhg. The diagnosis of hypertension should be based on at least two BP measurements in the sitting position per visit on at least two visits.

Take home messages Out-of-office BP Out-of-office BP, assessed by ambulatory or home BP monitoring, is an important adjunct to office BP measurement. The prediction of CV events is significantly better with out-of-office BP than with office BP. Prognosis is better in white-coat hypertension than in sustained hypertension and appears to be similar to that in true normotension. The incidence of CV events is about two times higher in masked hypertension than in true normotension and similar to the incidence in sustained hypertension. Cut-offs for the definition of hypertension are: 130/80 mmhg for 24-h BP, 135/85 mmhg for daytime ambulatory BP and home BP and 120/70 mmhg for night-time BP. Major indications for out-of-office BP are suspicion of white-coat, masked or nocturnal hypertension, suspected hypotension, considerable variability of office BP and treatment-resistant hypertension. 2b. Cardiovascular risk factors Total, LDL and HDL cholesterol, and fasting triglycerides and glucose are considered routine tests in all hypertensive patients. 2c. Search for asymptomatic organ damage and symptomatic disease Heart: an ECG is recommended in all hypertensive patients; additional tests (echocardiography, exercise testing, Holter monitoring) should be considered based on history, physical examination and ECG findings. Arteries: carotid and peripheral ultrasound, pulse wave velocity and ankle-brachial index should be considered as additional tests if indicated. Kidney: measurement of serum creatinine and estimation of glomerular filtration rate, assessment of urinary protein and microalbuminuria are recommended in all hypertensive patients. 2d. Search for secondary hypertension. All patients should undergo simple screening tests for secondary hypertension, including clinical history, physical examination and laboratory investigations, and a focused search should be undertaken when indicated. 3 - Treatment approach 3a. Lifestyle changes Appropriate lifestyle changes are the cornerstone for the prevention of hypertension and are also important for its treatment. The following lifestyle measures are recommended: Salt restriction to 5-6 g/day. Moderation of alcohol consumption (<20-30 g of ethanol per day in men and <10-20 g in women). Increased consumption of vegetables, fruits and low-fat dairy products. Reduction of weight to BMI of 25 kg/m 2. Regular exercise ( 30 min of moderate dynamic exercise on 5-7 days per week) Smoking cessation

Take home messages 3b. Initiation of antihypertensive drug treatment. Prompt initiation of antihypertensive drugs is recommended in patients at high or very high CV risk. Antihypertensive drugs should be considered in patients at moderate or low risk when BP remains >140/90 mmhg after, respectively, several weeks or months of appropriate lifestyle measures, or in case of persistently elevated out-of-office BP. In elderly patients drug treatment is recommended when systolic BP is 160 mmhg, or 140 mmhg if younger than 80 years and treatment is well tolerated. It is not recommended to initiate antihypertensive treatment at high normal BP and in younger patients with isolated systolic hypertension. 3c. Blood pressure goals Systolic BP A systolic BP goal of <140 mmhg is recommended in all hypertensive patients, with few exceptions. In elderly hypertensive patients less than 80 years old there is solid evidence to reduce systolic BP to between 150 and 140 mmhg, but a goal of <140 mmhg may be considered in fit elderly. In individuals older than 80 years it is recommended to reduce BP to between 150 and 140 mmhg if they are in good physical and mental condition. Diastolic BP A diastolic BP of <90 mmhg is always recommended, except in patients with diabetes, in whom values <85 mmhg are recommended. 3d. Choice of antihypertensive drugs Diuretics, beta-blockers, calcium antagonists, ACE-inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers are all suitable for the initiation and maintenance of antihypertensive treatment, either as monotherapy or in combination therapy. Some agents should be considered as the preferential choice in specific conditions, such as coronary heart disease, heart failure, diabetes or renal dysfunction. Initiation of antihypertensive therapy with two-drug combination may be considered in patients with markedly high baseline BP of at high CV risk. Among the many possible combinations, some are considered more suitable than others. 4 - Treatment strategies in special conditions 4a. White-coat and masked hypertension In white-coat hypertensives without additional risk factors, therapeutic intervention is limited to lifestyle changes and close follow-up is warranted. In case of higher CV risk, antihypertensive drug treatment may be considered. In masked hypertension, both lifestyle measures and drug treatment should be considered because of the high CV risk. 4b. Elderly When antihypertensive therapy is indicated as described in section 3b, all antihypertensive agents can be used, although diuretics and calcium antagonists may be preferred in isolated systolic hypertension.

Take home messages 4c. Pregnancy Drug treatment is recommended in severe hypertension in pregnancy (BP >160/110 mmhg), and may be considered in case of persistent BP 150/95 mmhg, and in those with BP 140/90 mmhg in the presence of gestational hypertension, asymptomatic organ damage or symptoms. Methyldopa, labetalol and nifedipine should be considered preferential antihypertensive drugs in pregnancy. Blockers of the renin-angiotensin system should be avoided in women with child-bearing potential. 4d. Diabetes It is recommended to start drug treatment when systolic BP is 140 mmhg. The BP target is <140/85 mmhg. All classes of antihypertensive drugs can be used, though blockers of the renin-angiotensin system may be preferred, especially in the presence of proteinuria or microalbuminuria, but simultaneous administration of two blockers of the renin-angiotensin system should be avoided. 4e. Nephropathy It is recommended to start drug treatment when systolic BP is 140 mmhg, targeting <140 mmhg. A target of <130 mmhg may be considered in case of overt proteinuria, and blockers of the renin- angiotensin system (though not in combination) are indicated in the presence of proteinuria or microalbuminuria. 4f. Cerebrovascular disease It is not recommended to intervene with BP-lowering therapy during the first week after acute stroke, although clinical judgement should be used in the face of very high systolic BP values. Antihypertensive treatment is recommended in hypertensive patients with a history of stroke or TIA when systolic BP is 140 mmhg, targeting <140 mmhg. All drug regimens are recommended in these patients, provided that BP is effectively reduced. 4g. Heart disease Coronary heart disease It is recommended to start drug treatment when systolic BP is 140 mmhg, and all antihypertensive agents can be used, targeting <140 mmhg. Beta-blockers are recommended in case of recent myocardial infarction, and beta-blockers and calcium antagonists in patients with angina pectoris. Heart failure Diuretics, beta-blockers, ACE-inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers and/or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists are recommended in patients with heart failure or severe left ventricular dysfunction. There is no evidence that antihypertensive therapy per se or any particular drug is beneficial in case of preserved ejection fraction. Lowering of systolic BP to around 140 mmhg should be considered in all of these patients. Left ventricular hypertrophy Antihypertensive therapy is recommended, and initiation with one of the agents that have shown greater ability to regress left ventricular hypertrophy should be considered, i.e. ACE-inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers and calcium antagonists.

Take home messages 4h. Resistant hypertension In case of true treatment-resistant hypertension, addition of a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, amiloride, and/or the alpha-blocker doxazocin should be considered. In case of ineffectiveness of drug treatment invasive procedures such as renal denervation and baroreceptor stimulation may be considered. 5 - Treatment of associated risk factors It is recommended to use statin therapy in hypertensive patients at moderate to high CV risk, targeting an LDL cholesterol value <3.0 mmol/l (115 mg/dl). When overt CHD is present, it is recommended to administer statin therapy to achieve LDL cholesterol levels <1.8 mmol/l (70 mg/dl). Antiplatelet therapy, in particular low-dose aspirin, is recommended in hypertensive patients with previous CV events. Aspirin should also be considered in hypertensive patients with reduced renal function or at high CV risk, provided that BP is well controlled. Aspirin is not recommended for CV prevention in low-moderate risk hypertensive patients, in whom absolute benefit and harm are equivalent. In hypertensive patients with diabetes, a HbA 1c target of <7.0% is recommended with antidiabetic treatment. In more fragile elderly patients with a longer diabetes duration, more comorbidities and at high risk, treatment to a HbA 1c target of <7.5 8.0% should be considered. 6 - Follow-up and improvement of blood pressure control Individuals with high normal BP or white-coat hypertension, even in untreated, should be scheduled for regular follow-up, at least annually, to measure office and out-of-office BP, to check the CV risk profile and to reinforce recommendations on lifestyle changes. After initiation of antihypertensive drug therapy in patients with hypertension, the patient should be seen at 2- to 4-week intervals to evaluate the effects on BP and to assess possible side-effects. Once the target BP is reached, a visit interval of a few months is reasonable. Depending on the local organization of health resources, many of the later visits may be performed by non-physician health care workers, such as nurses. For stable patients, home BP monitoring and electronic communication with the physician may also provide an acceptable alternative. It is advisable to assess risk factors and asymptomatic organ damage at least every 2 years. The finding of an uncontrolled BP should always lead to a search for the cause(s), such as poor adherence, persistent white-coat effect or use of BP-raising substances. Appropriate actions should be taken for better BP control, avoiding physician inertia.

Major gaps in evidence Based on the review of the evidence available for the 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines on Hypertension, it is apparent that several therapeutic issues are still open to question and would benefit from further investigation: Should antihypertensive drug treatment be given to all patients with grade 1 hypertension when their CV risk is low-to-moderate? Should elderly patients with a SBP between 140 and 160 mmhg be given antihypertensive drug treatments? Should drug treatment be given to subjects with white-coat hypertension? Can this condition be differentiated into patients needing or not needing treatment? Should antihypertensive drug treatment be started in the high normal BP range and, if so, in which patients? What are the optimal office BP values (i.e. the most protective and safe) for patients to achieve by treatment in different demographic and clinical conditions? Do treatment strategies based on control of out-of-office BP provide an advantage (reduced clinical morbidity and mortality, fewer drugs, fewer side-effects) over strategies based on conventional (office) BP control? What are the optimal out-of-office (home and ambulatory) BP values to be reached with treatment and should targets be lower or higher in high risk hypertensives? Does central BP add to CV event prediction in untreated and treated hypertensive patients? Do invasive procedures for treatment of resistant hypertension compare favourably with the best drug treatment and provide long-term BP control and reduction of morbid and fatal events? Do treatment-induced changes in asymptomatic organ damage predict outcome? Which measures or combinations of measures are most valuable? Are lifestyle measures known to reduce BP capable of reducing morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients? Does a treatment-induced reduction of 24h BP variability add to CV protection by antihypertensive treatment? Does BP reduction substantially lower CV risk in resistant hypertension?

For more information For more information Eheart_34_17_cover.qxd 12/4/13 8:11 PM Page 1 Committee for Practice Guidelines To improve the quality of clinical practice and patient care in Europe CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES OF THE EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF CARDIOLOGY For more information w.esca Editor-in-Chief: Thomas F. Lüscher Deputy Editors: Bernard J. Gersh Senior Consulting Editors: John A. Camm Reprinted from European Heart Journal (2010) 31, 2369-2429 doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehq278 ESC Cardiology Clinical Practice Guidelines & Derivative Products Available 34 17 ISSN 0195-668X (Print) ISSN 1522-9645 (Online) 1 May 2013 EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF CARDIOLOGY Volume 34 Number 17 1 May 2013 MEMBER OF THE ESC JOURNAL FAMILY European Heart Journal Pages 1245 1312 European Heart Journal Air pollution and survival in ACS HPS2-THRIVE LDLR receptor and low LDL levels The Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health study Journal of the European Society of Cardiology Gerhard Hindricks Ulf Landmesser Frank Ruschitzka William Wijns Diederick E. Grobbee Tiny Jaarsma Gerald Maurer Patrick W. Serruys Karen Sipido Dirk van Veldhuisen The invisible made visible: multi-modality imaging in the evaluation of cardiac sarcoidosis. See figure legend on page 1278. Christian J.M. Vrints Abridged Pocket version www.eurheartj.org Full Text Journal version ESC Educational Courses ESC Educational Courses and Webinars ESSENTIAL MESSAGES FROM ESC GUIDELINES Committee for Practice Guidelines To improve the quality of clinical practice and patient care in Europe ESC CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES OF THE EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF CARDIOLOGY For more information GUIDELINES Smartphone and Tablet version ESC Accreditation Essential Messages Summary Cards Slide-Sets Information and downloads available at:

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF CARDIOLOGY 2035, ROUTE DES COLLES LES TEMPLIERS - BP 179 06903 SOPHIA ANTIPOLIS CEDEX - FRANCE PHONE: +33 (0)4 92 94 76 00 FAX: +33 (0)4 92 94 76 01 E-mail: guidelines@escardio.org 2013 The European Society of Cardiology No part of these Essential Messages may be translated or reproduced in any form without written permission from the ESC. The following material was adapted from the ESH/ESC Guidelines for Management of Arterial Hypertension (Eur Heart J 2013;34:2159-219; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht151). To read the full report as published by the European Society of Cardiology, visit our Web Site at: Copyright European Society of Cardiology 2013 - All Rights Reserved. The content of these European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines has been published for personal and educational use only. No commercial use is authorized. No part of the ESC Guidelines may be translated or reproduced in any form without written permission from the ESC. Permission can be obtained upon submission of a written request to ESC, Practice Guidelines Department, 2035, route des Colles - Les Templiers - BP179-06903 Sophia Antipolis Cedex - France. Disclaimer: The ESC Guidelines represent the views of the ESC which were arrived at after careful consideration of the available evidence at the time they were written. Health professionals are encouraged to take them fully into account when exercising their clinical judgment. The guidelines do not, however, override the individual responsibility of health professionals to make appropriate decisions in the circumstances of the individual patients, in consultation with that patient, and where appropriate and necessary the patient s guardian or carer. It is also the health professional s responsibility to verify the rules and regulations applicable to drugs and devices at the time of prescription. For more information