Changes to Michigan s Workers Compensation Act written by Jerry R. Newman



Similar documents
What s Next for Worker s Comp

CHANGES TO THE MICHIGAN WORKERS COMPENSATION STATUTE

Key Provisions of Tennessee Senate Bill 200 Effective July 1, 2014, through July 1, 2016

Legislative Council, State of Michigan Courtesy of

How To Change The Law On Workers Compensation

Workers Compensation In Michigan - A Brief History

General Information on Representing Yourself in a Workers Compensation Case

Current Workers Compensation Law Compared to the 2013 Workers Compensation Reform Act

HOUSE BILL No July 18, 2013, Introduced by Rep. Heise and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

Rights & Obligations under the Nebraska Workers Compensation Law

LEGISLATIVE BILL 951

I ve been injured at work. What do I do? Information for workers

SENATE BILL 1486 AN ACT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Associated Industries Of Florida

SUMMARY OF LOUISIANA WORKERS COMPENSATION LAWS

DENVER OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

2011 Changes to Kansas Workers Compensation Act

WikiLeaks Document Release

Guide. to Recovery Under The Illinois Workers Compensation Act. The Injured Employee s

MoDOT & Patrol Employees Retirement System MPERS Disability Benefits Claim Packet Instructions

.25 Schedule of [Attorneys'] Attorney's Fees.

New Jersey State Disability Claim. Your New Jersey State Disability Benefit Claim. The Standard Benefit Administrators. How To Apply For Benefits

S.B th General Assembly (As Introduced)

2012 Annual Report. Workers Compensation Agency

Introduced by Representative Gardner AN ACT

Personal Injury and Workers Compensation Awards in Equitable Distribution: What Every Lawyer Should Know

Things You Should Know About Your Child s Personal Injury Case

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA ORDER NO Pretrial Conferences; Scheduling; Management.

LOUISIANA WORKERS COMPENSATION LAW CHANGES 2012

If you have been involved in a work-related accident, there are a lot of things that you absolutely need to know.

Enrolled Copy H.B. 287

Guide for Injured Workers

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION

North Carolina State Government

INNS OF COURT CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA APRIL 8, 2010 RONALD R. TWEEL MICHIE HAMLETT LOWRY RASMUSSEN AND TWEEL, PLLC

Court of Claims. House Transportation and Justice Subcommittee. Jamie L. Doskocil, Senior Budget Analyst Legislative Service Commission

SUBCHAPTER 10L INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION FORMS SECTION.0100 WORKERS COMPENS ATION FORMS

Workers Compensation and Seniors

LONG TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE CERTIFICATE BOOKLET

Summary of New South Carolina Workers Compensation Laws For Injuries On or After July 1, 2007

LONG TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE CERTIFICATE BOOKLET

UTAH. Past medical expenses may be recovered. Plaintiffs must show that they have been injured and,

The 411 on Connecticut Injuries at Work and Workers Compensation

A BILL for AN ACT. Serial 137 Personal Injuries (Civil Claims) Bill 2003 Dr Toyne

OKLAHOMA (CURRENT SYSTEM)

How To Get Benefits From The Second Injury Fund

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2015 H 1 HOUSE BILL 741. Short Title: Shift Workers' Bill of Rights. (Public)

the court determines at a non-jury hearing that the award is not in the best interest of the child. The burden of proof at a hearing under this

NC WORKERS COMPENSATION: BASIC INFORMATION FOR MEDICAL PROVIDERS

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No.

United States General Accounting Office Testimony

PART 15--ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIMS UNDER FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS ACT

Workers Compensation

Now Hear This... Workers' Compensation and Hearing Loss. Volume 3, No. 4 Winter

Public School Employees Retirement System. Let s Talk About. Disability Retirement Benefits

*P roject S E.N.S.O.R.

ENROLLED HOUSE BILL No. 4455

CHAPTER LICENSING OF INSURANCE PRODUCERS, SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE PRODUCERS, AND CONSULTANTS

The Howard County Public School System Disability Insurance Claim Packet Instructions. Your Disability Benefit Claim

Workers' Compensation

Who Administers the Workers Compensation Program and Related Responsibilities?

INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA

BUILDING A WORKERS COMPENSATION DEFENSE ARSENAL IN A WORLD OF MISTRUST

Legislative Update. legal challenge to new law. significant changes to oklahoma work comp

MARCH 9, Referred to Committee on Commerce, Labor and Energy. SUMMARY Makes various changes relating to workers compensation.

GOVERNMENT CODE SUBTITLE A. OPEN GOVERNMENT CHAPTER 554. PROTECTION FOR REPORTING VIOLATIONS OF LAW. (A)AAa state or federal statute;

COMPUTING COUNTY OFFICIAL SALARIES FOR

HAWAI`I REVISED STATUTES CHAPTER 672B DESIGN CLAIM CONCILIATION PANEL. Act 207, 2007 Session Laws of Hawai`i

Enhanced LTD Insurance For Physician And Attorney Groups

LONG TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE CERTIFICATE BOOKLET

How To Get A Disability Check In The United States

THE STATE OF TEXAS LANDOWNER S BILL OF RIGHTS

Baltimore County Maryland, et al. v. Carroll Thiergartner No. 44, September Term, 2014

LEGAL UPDATES IN WORKERS COMPENSATION

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKERS COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION V DOCKET # OPINION

STATE OF OKLAHOMA. 2nd Session of the 53rd Legislature (2012) AS INTRODUCED

Information for Worker s Compensation Clients

Buy-up Short Term Disability Insurance

WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD Case No. App. Div Decision No BRUCE OLESON (Appellant) v. INTERNATIONAL PAPER (Appellee)

MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2013

NOTE: THIS IS A SECOND CORRECTED OPINION/ORDER. THE BOLDED CORRECTION IS AN ADDITION TO FOOTNOTE #1.

History: Add. 1971, Act 19, Imd. Eff. May 5, 1971; Am. 1976, Act 89, Imd. Eff. Apr. 17, 1976.

Appendix I: Select Federal Legislative. Proposals Addressing Compensation for Asbestos-Related Harms or Death

Facts About Maine s. Compensation Laws

A Bill Clarifying a Workers Compensation Insurer s. Subrogation Interest in Third-Party Claims

The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate, and assembly, do enact as follows:

The Truth About Issue 2

Michie's Legal Resources. This part shall be known and may be cited as the Tennessee Identity Theft Deterrence Act of [Acts 1999, ch. 201, 2.

A Litigator s View of the Special Employer Doctrine

AN ACT. To amend chapter 383, RSMo, by adding thereto thirteen new sections relating to the Missouri health care arbitration act.

PERS Disability Benefits

HOUSE BILL No Washburne

Special Civil Mandatory Attorney s Fees

STATUS OF MINORS AND CHILD SUPPORT Act 293 of The People of the State of Michigan enact:

The Long Term Disability Benefits application includes claim forms and an Authorization.

ILLINOIS LAW MANUAL CHAPTER X SETTLEMENTS & RELEASES. Prior to July 1, 2003, there were in existence at least eight (8) lien statutes that

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.

GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS

201% through 225% of FPG. 226% through 250% of FPG. 75% Adjustment. 50% Adjustment

Chapter No. 972] PUBLIC ACTS, CHAPTER NO. 972 HOUSE BILL NO By Representative Kisber. Substituted for: Senate Bill No.

Transcription:

Changes to Michigan s Workers Compensation Act written by Jerry R. Newman The Michigan Legislature has enacted major changes to the Workers Compensation Act which were recently signed by the Governor. The changes are presented below, with comments when appropriate. DEFINITION OF A SELF-EMPLOYED PERSON As of January 1, 2013, services provided by an individual will be considered employment if the person is determined to be in an employer-employee relationship using the 20-factor test of the IRS. The determination is to be made by the Michigan Administrative Hearing System. If an employer is required to withhold Federal income tax for an individual, that is prima facie proof the individual is considered an employee. A business will be able to ask the Michigan Administrative Hearing system whether one or more individuals performing service for the business in Michigan are engaged in covered employment. The hearing systems are required to issue a determination on the issue. Comment: It is unclear at this time if the determination will be made by a Workers Compensation Magistrate or some other person. SELECTION OF MAGISTRATES The Qualifi cations Advisory Committee has been abolished, as has the written examination for the position of Magistrate. The requirement of 5 years experience practicing workers compensation law in the state is also abolished. The new requirement is now that a Magistrate simply needs to be an attorney for 5 or more years for appointment by the Governor. The 12 year limit on serving as a Magistrate has been eliminated. Each Magistrate will now be reviewed each year by the Executive Director of the Administrate Hearing System and the Chief Magistrate. A new measure of review is the adherence to establish productivity standards. The Governor can remove a Magistrate upon recommendation of the Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs based upon a written report of the annual evaluation. There will be a maximum of 17 Magistrates, each term is for 4 years.

DEFINITION OF INJURY A personal injury is compensable if work causes, contributes to, or aggravates pathology in a manner so as to create a pathology that is medically distinguishable from any pathology that existed prior to the injury. Degenerative arthritis is compensable if contributed to or aggravated or accelerated by the employment in a signifi cant manner. Mental disabilities are compensable if they arise out of actual events of employment, not unfounded perceptions, and if the employee s perception of the actual events is reasonably grounded in fact or reality. MEDICAL TREATMENT Injured workers must now wait 28 days before treating with a provider of their choice. DEFINITION OF DISABILITY Disability still means a limitation of wage earning capacity. A limitation of wage earning capacity occurs only if a personal injury covered under this act results in the employee s being unable to perform all jobs paying the maximum wages in work suitable to that employee s qualifi cations and training, which includes work that may be performed using the employee s transferable work skills. A disability is total if the employee is unable to earn in any job paying maximum wage in work suitable to the employee s qualifi cations and training. A disability is partial if the employee retains a wage earning capacity at a pay level less than his or her maximum wages in work suitable to his or her qualifi cations and training. The establishment of disability does not create a presumption of wage loss. Wage earning capacity means the wages the employee earns or is capable of earning at a job reasonably available to that employee, whether or not wages are actually earned. For the purposes of establishing a limitation of wage earning capacity, an employee has an affi rmative duty to seek work reasonably available to that employee, taking into consideration the limitations from the work-related personal injury or disease. A Magistrate may consider good-faith job search efforts to determine whether jobs are reasonably available. Wage loss means the amount of wages lost due to a disability. The employee shall establish a connection between the disability and reduced wages in establishing the wage loss. Wage loss may be established, among other methods, by demonstrating the employee s good-faith effort to procure work within his or her wage earning capacity. A partially disabled employee who establishes a good-faith effort to procure work but cannot obtain work within his or her wage earning capacity is entitled to weekly benefi ts as if totally disabled. To establish an initial showing of disability, an employee shall do all of the following: (a) Disclose his or her qualifi cations and training, including education, skills, and experience, whether or not they are relevant to the job the employee was performing at the time of the injury. (b) Provide evidence as to the jobs, if any, he or she is qualifi ed and trained to perform within the same salary range as his or her maximum wage earning capacity at the time of the injury.

(c) Demonstrate that the work-related injury prevents the employee from performing jobs identifi ed as within his or her qualifi cations and training that pay maximum wages. (d) If the employee is capable of performing any of the jobs identifi ed in subdivision (c), show that he or she cannot obtain any of those jobs. The evidence shall include a showing of a good-faith attempt to procure post-injury employment if there are jobs at the employee s maximum wage earning capacity at the time of the injury. Once an employee establishes an initial showing of a disability under subsection (5), the employer bears the burden of production of evidence to refute the employee s showing. In satisfying its burden of production of evidence, the employer has a right to discovery if necessary for the employer to sustain its burden and present a meaningful defense. The employee may present additional evidence to challenge the evidence submitted by the employer. If a personal injury arising out of the course of employment causes total disability and wage loss and the employee is entitled to wage loss benefi ts, the employer shall pay or cause to be paid to the injured employee as provided in this section weekly compensation equal to 80% of the employee s after-tax average weekly wage, but not more than the maximum weekly rate determined under Section 355. Compensation shall be paid for the duration of the disability. If a personal injury arising out of the course of employment causes partial disability and wage loss and the employee is entitled to wage loss benefi ts, the employer shall pay or cause to be paid to the injured employee as provided in this section weekly compensation equal to 80% of the difference between the injured employee s after-tax average weekly wage before the personal injury and the employee s wage earning capacity after the personal injury, but not more than the maximum weekly rate determined under Section 355. Compensation shall be paid for the duration of the disability. Comment: These sections are a codifi cation of recent court decisions. TERMINATION FROM REASONABLE EMPLOYMENT If an employee is terminated from reasonable employment by his or her own fault, the employee is considered to have voluntarily removed themselves from the work force and is not entitled to any wage loss benefi ts. SUBSEQUENT EMPLOYMENT AND BENEFITS If the employee was employed for less than 100 weeks, the employee shall receive compensation based upon his or her average weekly wage at the time of the original injury. If the employee was employed for 100 weeks or more but less than 250 weeks, then after exhausting unemployment benefi ts eligibility, a Workers Compensation Magistrate may determine that the employee since the time of the injury has not established a new wage earning capacity and, if the Magistrate makes that determination, benefi ts shall be based on his or her average weekly wage at the original date of injury. If the Magistrate does not make that determination, the employee is presumed to have established a post-injury wage earning capacity and benefi ts shall not be paid based on the wage at the original date of injury.

If the employee was employed for 250 weeks or more, the employee is presumed to have established a postinjury wage earning capacity. REHABILITATION ORDERS AND APPEALS All rehabilitation orders will now come from the Director of the Workers Compensation Agency. All appeals of these orders must now be fi led within 15 days of the mailing date directly to the Appellate Commission. SPECIFIC LOSS The effect of any internal joint replacement surgery, internal implant, or other similar medical procedure shall be considered in determining whether a specifi c loss has occurred. Comment: This language eliminates prior case law which basically held that a person with a successful prothesis could still be considered disabled or have suffered loss of use of a body part. INTEREST ON AWARDS Interest on awards will now be calculated as a money judgment in a civil case. Comment: Previously, the interest on awards was 10%. The current rate in civil cases is 3.007%. REDEMPTIONS Ten day letters can now be sent electronically to the insured. The parties can stipulate in writing to the fi ndings required to be made by a Magistrate and it may serve as a wavier of a hearing and the Magistrate may approve the redemption. A Magistrate can conduct a hearing on a proposed stipulation. Comment: It is not recommended this procedure be used with an unrepresented injured worker, or in a case in which Medicare is involved. In these situations, a full hearing on the record should be held. ELECTRONIC FILINGS Redemption orders can be served electronically. Applications for benefi ts can be fi led electronically. Magistrate Opinions and Order may be fi led and distributed electronically. MEDIATION The position of Mediator has been eliminated. Any future mediations can be mediated by the parties. Comment: There is no procedure at this time for how these new mediations will take place, which brings up the questions of why it is in the statute at all. SUBPOENAS

Subpoenas now only need to be signed by one of the attorneys in the case. Comment: This will allow for quicker issuance and service of subpoenas for medical records, and reduce appearance costs. However, many Magistrates have taken the position that until the Agency changes the subpoena form, Magistrate signatures are still required. MEDICAL BENEFITS DURING APPEAL Reasonable and necessary medical benefi ts required by a Magistrate s award are to be paid while a case is on appeal. Comment: The term reasonable and necessary has been added to the Act. Before the change, all medical benefi ts were required to be paid during an appeal EFFECTIVE DATE The changes apply to injuries incurred on or after December 19, 2011. Comment: While it is clear the portions of the Act dealing with defi nitions of disability and how it is to be proven at trial affect new injures, it would seem the procedural and administrative changes should pertain to any cases in the system as of December 19, 2011. Please feel free to share this report with your team. If you would like a copy of the new law, please call Jerry Newman at 248-324-2620. As always, we are available to discuss any aspect of the changes with you and your team. Also, if you would like to arrange a meeting with your team to review and discuss the changes please call Jerry. For more information on the details of this advisory contact Jerry R. Newman at 248-324-2620 or via e-mail at jrnewman@kopkalaw.com KOPKA, PINKUS, DOLIN & EADS is a multi state civil litigation defense fi rm that approaches litigation from the client s perspective. Among a diverse group of clients, including many of the nation s largest insurance companies, are a wide range of businesses, manufacturers, service and distribution companies, health care institutions and professionals. The fi rm s attorneys have extensive trial experience in numerous federal and state courts nationwide as well as appellate experience which includes the United States Supreme Court, federal appellate circuit courts, state Supreme Courts and various state appellate courts. For more information, please visit www.kopkalaw.com.