Standard 1. Foundational Knowledge Candidates have knowledge of the foundations of reading and writing processes and instruction.



Similar documents
Literacy Specialist Endorsement

IRA/NCATE Standards for Reading Professionals -

Program Report for the Preparation of Reading Education Professionals International Reading Association (IRA)

South Carolina Literacy Competencies. for Reading Coaches

SECTION 4: MASTER OF EDUCATION DEGREE

1 REVISOR C. show verification of completing a Board of Teaching preparation program

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR ADVANCED MASTERS PROGRAMS LANGUAGE, LITERACY & SPECIALIZED INSTRUCTION READING SPECIALIST STANDARDS

TEACHERS OF READING.

1. Candidates understand the theoretical and evidence-based foundations of reading and writing processes and instruction as follows:

Monmouth University School of Education Alumni Survey May 2011 N = 278 Part I: Year Completing the Most Recent Program at Monmouth University

Literacy Program Handbook For: Master of Science Degree- Literacy Education Post Master s Certificate- Literacy Specialist

Reading Specialist. Practicum Handbook Addendum to be used in conjunction with the Education Unit Practicum Handbook

Literacy Education. Master of Science in Education: Program Overview. Program Highlights

School of Education MASTER OF ARTS IN EDUCATION. MAED: Reading & Reading Programs

RUBRICS FOR READING SPECIALIST STANDARDS

* Lab Experience Course Code: (1) General Studies/Core (3) Major ** Field Experience (2) Enhanced General Studies (4) Professional Education

How To Teach Reading

ILLINOIS CERTIFICATION TESTING SYSTEM

ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARDS (2013)

How To Write A Thesis

READING SPECIALIST STANDARDS

Reading Specialist. Program Handbook

BEST PRACTICES RESOURCE GUIDE for ELEMENTARY, MIDDLE, and HIGH SCHOOLS

Exam papers from RE 5100, Beginning Readers and Writers. Assessment Summary Sheet from RE 5715, Reading Assessment and Correction

Literacy Coaching/ Reading Specialists

MILLIKIN TEACHING STANDARDS

Curriculum and Instruction

Requirements EDAM WORD STUDY K-3: PRINT AWARENESS, LETTER KNOWLEDGE, PHONICS, AND HIGH FREQUENCY WORDS

Program Report for the Preparation of Reading Education Professionals International Reading Association (IRA)

Standard Two: Knowledge of Mathematics: The teacher shall be knowledgeable about mathematics and mathematics instruction.

Masters of Reading Information Booklet. College of Education

IAC Ch 13, p.1. b. Oral communication.

SECTION 5: MASTER OF EDUCATION DEGREE

Reading Specialist (151)

SECTION 5: MASTER OF EDUCATION DEGREE

Reading Competencies

Pre-Requisites EDAM-5001 Early Literacy Guiding Principles and Language

Matrix Showing Match between NCATE Curriculum Guidelines for Early Childhood Education and CEOE Competencies. CEOE Subarea Competency III III

M.A. in Special Education / Candidates for Initial License

TEACHER CERTIFICATION STUDY GUIDE INFORMATION ACCESS AND DELIVERY IN THE LIBRARY MEDIA PROGRAM

READING WITH. Reading with Pennsylvania Reading Specialist Certificate

(Advanced Preparation)

STANDARDS FOR THE MASTER OF LIBRARY SCIENCE DEGREE/ SCHOOL LIBRARY MEDIA COORDINATOR LICENSE

EDUC 605 Curriculum Development and Assessment.. 3 cr

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Instructional Technology Facilitators

Commission on Teacher Credentialing. Education Specialist Clear Program Standards

Language Reading Connection

Standards for the Speech-Language Pathologist [28.230]

The residency school counselor program does not prepare candidates to design, deliver, and

AND LEARNING 21st Century Teaching and Learning

TESOL Standards for P-12 ESOL Teacher Education = Unacceptable 2 = Acceptable 3 = Target

Reading Instruction and Reading Achievement Among ELL Students

TOOL KIT for RESIDENT EDUCATOR and MENT OR MOVES

The ISTE National Educational Technology Standards (NETS S) and Performance Indicators for Students 1. Creativity and Innovation

Technology Curriculum Standards

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Speech- Language Pathologists

GaPSC Teacher Leadership Program Standards

Scientifically Based Reading Programs. Marcia L. Kosanovich, Ph.D. Florida Center for Reading Research SLP Academy Fall, 2005

STANDARDS FOR ENGLISH-AS-A-SECOND LANGUAGE TEACHERS

WiggleWorks Aligns to Title I, Part A

North Carolina TEACHER. evaluation process. Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction

GEORGIA STANDARDS FOR THE APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION UNITS AND EDUCATOR PREPARATION PROGRAMS

Chapter 3 - Alternative Assessments

COLLEGE OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF TEACHER EDUCATION [READING EDUCATION] [READ PHD.] ANNUAL ASSESSMENT REPORT SUBMITTED MARCH 2013

Verification of Experience Multiple and Single Subject Credential Programs

Reading Endorsement Inservice Add-on Certification Program

Key Assessments School Library Media Specialist

Dewar College of Education and Human Services Valdosta State University Department of Early Childhood and Special Education

Exceptional Student Education K 12

Standards for Certification in Early Childhood Education [ ]

Introduction to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and Reading First (RF)

Field Experience and Student Teaching Competencies

The University of North Carolina at Pembroke Academic Catalog

Bilingual Education: English Language Learners Secondary Reading/LA Instruction

SCHOOL COUNSELING. Assessment at a Glance. Early Childhood through Young Adulthood. Choosing the Right Certificate. Reviewing the Standards

Masters in. Literacy Education

Students with Reading Problems Their Characteristics and Needs

Pasco County Schools. Add-On Program. Reading K-12. Endorsement

Reading Assessment BTSD. Topic: Reading Assessment Teaching Skill: Understanding formal and informal assessment

MDE Literacy Positions Available

Standards for Professional Development

District 2854 Ada-Borup Public Schools. Reading Well By Third Grade Plan. For. Ada-Borup Public Schools. Drafted April 2012

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS * * Adapted from March 2004 NJ DOE presentation by Peggy Freedson-Gonzalez

Instruction: Design, Delivery, Assessment Worksheet

Reading Specialist Certification

Novice Experienced Expert a. Understands the importance of ABE, ASE, and ESOL at the personal and program level. X X X

C Reading Sufficiency Act - Programs of Reading Instruction

Transcription:

Standard 1. Foundational Knowledge Candidates have knowledge of the foundations of reading and writing processes and instruction. 1.1 Demonstrate knowledge of psychological, sociological and linguistic foundations of reading and writing processes and instruction. 1.2 Demonstrate knowledge of reading research and histories of reading. 1.3 Demonstrate knowledge of language development and reading acquisition and the variations related to cultural and linguistic diversity. 1.4 Demonstrate knowledge of the major components of reading (phonemic awareness, word identification and phonics, vocabulary and background knowledge, fluency, comprehension strategies, and motivation) and how they are integrated in fluent reading. Refer to major theories in the foundational area as they relate to reading. They can explain, compare, contrast, and critique the theories. Summarize seminal reading studies and articulate how these studies impacted reading instruction. They can recount historical developments in the history of reading. Identify, explain, compare, and contrast the theories and research in the areas of language development and learning to read. Are able to determine if students are appropriately integrating the components reading (phonemic awareness, word identification and phonics, vocabulary and background knowledge, fluency, comprehension strategies, and motivation) in fluent reading.

Standard 2. Instructional Strategies and Curriculum Materials Candidates will use a wide range of instructional practices, approaches, methods, and curriculum materials to support reading and writing instruction. 2.1 Use instructional grouping options (individual, small-group, whole-class, and computer based) as appropriate for accomplishing given purposes. 2.2 Use a wide range of instructional practices, approaches, and methods, including technology-based practices for learners at differing stages of development and from differing cultural and linguistic backgrounds. 2.3 Use a wide range of curriculum materials in effective reading instruction for learners at different stages of reading and writing development and from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds. paraprofessionals in their use of instructional grouping options. They help teachers select appropriate options. They demonstrate the options and explain the evidence based rationale for changing configurations to best meet the needs of all students. paraprofessionals in the use of a wide range of instructional practices, approaches, and methods, including technology-based practices. They help teachers select appropriate options and explain the evidence-base for selecting practices to best meet the needs of all students. They demonstrate the options in their own teaching and in demonstration teaching. paraprofessionals in the use of a wide range of curriculum materials. They help teachers select appropriate options and explain the evidence base for selecting practices to best meet the needs of all students. They demonstrate the options in their own teaching and in demonstrating teaching.

Standard 3. Assessment, Diagnosis and Evaluation Candidates use a variety of assessment tools and practices to plan and evaluate effective reading instruction. 3.1 Use a wide range of assessment tools and practices that range from individual and group standardized tests to individual and group informal classroom assessment strategies, including technology-based assessment tools. 3.2 Place students along a developmental continuum and identify students proficiencies and difficulties. 3.3 Use assessment information to plan, evaluate, and revise effective instruction that meets the needs of all students, including those at different developmental stages and those from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds. 3.4 Communicate results of assessment to specific individuals (students, parents, caregivers, colleagues, administrators, policymakers, policy officials, community, etc.). Compare and contrast, use, interpret, and recommend a wide range of assessment tools and practices. Assessments may range from standardize tests to informal assessments and also include technology-based assessments, they demonstrate appropriate use of assessments in their practice, and they can train classroom teachers to administer and interpret these assessments. Support the classroom teacher in assessment of individual students. They extend the assessment to further determine proficiencies and difficulties for appropriate services. Assist the classroom teacher in using assessment to plan instruction for all students. They use in-depth assessment information to plan individual instruction for struggling readers. They collaborate with other education professionals to implement appropriate reading instruction for individual students. They collect, analyze, and use school-wide assessment data to implement and revise school reading programs. Communicate assessment information to various audiences for both accountability and instructional purposes (policymakers, public officials, community members, clinical specialists, school psychologists, social workers, classroom teachers, and parents).

Standard 4. Creating a Literate Environment Candidates create a literate environment that fosters reading and writing by integrating foundational knowledge, use of instructional practices, approaches and methods, curriculum materials, and the appropriate use of assessments. 4.1 Use students interests, reading abilities, and backgrounds as foundations for the reading and writing program. 4.2 Use a large supply of books, technology-based information, and non-print materials representing multiple levels, broad interests, and cultural and linguistic backgrounds. 4.3 Model reading and writing enthusiastically as valued lifelong activities. 4.4 Motivate learners to be lifelong readers. Assist the classroom teacher and paraprofessional in selecting materials that match the reading levels, interests, and cultural background of students. Assist the classroom teacher in selecting books, technologybased information, and nonprint materials representing multiple levels, broad interests, and cultural and linguistic backgrounds. Demonstrate and model reading and writing for real purposes in daily interactions with students and education professionals. Assist teachers and paraprofessionals to model reading and writing as valued lifelong activities Use methods to effectively revise instructional plans to motivate all students. They assist classroom teachers in designing programs that will intrinsically and extrinsically motivate students. They demonstrate these techniques and they can articulate the research base that grounds their practice.

Standard 5. Professional Development Candidates view professional development as a career-long effort and responsibility. 5.1 Display positive dispositions related to reading and the teaching of reading. 5.2 Continue to pursue the development of professional knowledge and dispositions. 5.3 Work with colleagues to observe, evaluate, and provide feedback on each other s practice. 5.4 Participate in, initiate, implement, and evaluate professional development programs. Articulate the theories related to the connections between teacher dispositions and student achievement. Conduct professional study groups for paraprofessionals and teachers. Assist classroom teachers and paraprofessionals in identifying, planning, and implementing personal professional development plans. Advocate to advance the professional research base to expand knowledge-based practices Positively and constructively provide an evaluation own or others teaching policies. Assist classroom teachers and paraprofessionals as they strive to improve their practice. Exhibit leadership skills in professional development. They plan, implement, and evaluate professional development efforts at the grade, school, district, and/or state level. They are cognizant of and can identify and describe the characteristics of sound professional development programs. They can articulate the evidence base that grounds their practice.