Human Reliability Analysis. Workshop Information IAEA Workshop



Similar documents
Basic Level 1 PSA course for analysts

ASSESSMENT OF HUMAN ERROR IMPORTANCE IN PWR PSA

Safety of Nuclear Power Plant : Human Reliability Analysis (HRA) Prof. Wolfgang Kröger

How To Know How To Determine Dependability

IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making. System Analysis. Lecturer. Workshop Information IAEA Workshop

Human Error Probability Estimation for Process Risk Assessment with emphasis on Control Room Operations

Understanding Human Behaviour and Error

Temelin NPP Risk Panel A PSA and Safety Monitor Application. Workshop Information IAEA Workshop

An approach to analyse human reliability during refuelling outage of a nuclear power plant

IAEA Training in level 1 PSA and PSA applications. PSA applications. PSA-based evaluation and rating of operational events

Safety Driven Design with UML and STPA M. Rejzek, S. Krauss, Ch. Hilbes. Fourth STAMP Workshop, March 23-26, 2015, MIT Boston

Safety Analysis for Nuclear Power Plants

Advanced Software Test Design Techniques Use Cases

Review of human reliability assessment methods

FMEA and FTA Analysis

University of Paderborn Software Engineering Group II-25. Dr. Holger Giese. University of Paderborn Software Engineering Group. External facilities

Ten steps to better requirements management.

2 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION TECHNIQUES

Gates, Circuits, and Boolean Algebra

Human Factors in Design and Construction Regulatory Perspective

EST.03. An Introduction to Parametric Estimating

Validation and Calibration. Definitions and Terminology

Diablo Canyon NPP Probabilistic Risk Assessment Program. Workshop Information IAEA Workshop

Lecture 9: Requirements Modelling

Performing Early Feasibility Studies of Software Development Projects Using Business Process Models

TASK ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES

Essay Writing. Unit 1A How to be Analytical: What is Analysis? INDEPENDENT LEARNING RESOURCES. Learning Centre

A Risk Management System Framework for New Product Development (NPD)

UNIT 1 INTRODUCTION TO NC MACHINE TOOLS

A SET OF COMPUTER BASED TOOLS IDENTIFYING AND PREVENTING HUMAN ERROR IN PLANT OPERATIONS

Unit A Managing Health and Safety

Business Process Management. Prof. Corrado Cerruti General Management Course

Design Verification The Case for Verification, Not Validation

MSCA Introduction to Statistical Concepts

METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSMENT OF NON-FORMAL AND INFORMAL LEARNING ACHIEVEMENTS IN A STUDY PROCESS

The Cost of Risks. Essence of Risk Quantification. Forum Calgary 2008

Greatest Common Factor and Least Common Multiple

Safety Requirements Specification Guideline

KS3 Computing Group 1 Programme of Study hours per week

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

UML TUTORIALS THE USE CASE MODEL

The use of mind maps as an assessment tool.

BODY OF KNOWLEDGE CERTIFIED SIX SIGMA YELLOW BELT

DEVELOPMENT OF A VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT CODE FOR A PHYSICAL PROTECTION SYSTEM: SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL PROTECTION EFFECTIVENESS (SAPE)

Instructional Design for Engineering Programs

STANDARD. Risk Assessment. Supply Chain Risk Management: A Compilation of Best Practices

Propulsion Gas Path Health Management Task Overview. Donald L. Simon NASA Glenn Research Center

Writing learning objectives

PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT AND RISK MANAGEMENT OF A NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Position Classification Standard for Management and Program Clerical and Assistance Series, GS-0344

Net Present Value Risk Analysis

ROYAL HOLLOWAY University of London PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

The Little Man Computer

6-1. Process Modeling

Portfolio management tools. Why and when are they used?

SUCCESSFUL INTERFACE RISK MANAGEMENT FROM BLAME CULTURE TO JOINT ACTION

Concepts of digital forensics

Motivations. spm adolfo villafiorita - introduction to software project management

Safety Regulation Group SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS GUIDANCE TO ORGANISATIONS. April

Unit/Lesson Planning Guide: Key Questions to Consider While Planning

% ! 3 40% % Percent Cards. This problem gives you the chance to: relate fractions, decimals and percents

Final Year Projects at itm. Topics 2010/2011

(Refer Slide Time: 01:52)

THE SYSTEMS APPROACH TO CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT

US-APWR Human Performance Monitoring Implementation Plan

Explain how Employee Performance is Measured and Managed

Utilizing the Decision Matrix to Introduce the Engineering Design Process

8 Divisibility and prime numbers

A Guide To The Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) Significant Changes from the 3 rd edition to the 4 th edition

Multiplying Fractions

Preparing a maintenance plan

Mathematical goals. Starting points. Materials required. Time needed

SPECIFIC FEATURES REGARDING THE PREVENTION OF WORK ACCIDENTS AND OCCUPATIONAL DESEASES IN LAND RECLAMATIONS ACTIVITY

Advanced Computer Architecture-CS501. Computer Systems Design and Architecture 2.1, 2.2, 3.2

Model-based Synthesis. Tony O Hagan

SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT FOR DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM EVALUATION

Problem Analysis Techniques

PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROFESSIONAL CERTIFIED ASSOCIATE IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT (PMP & CAPM) EXAM PREPARATION WORKSHOP

Integration Mgmt / Initiating Process Group 4.1 Develop Project Charter

DEVELOPING A PHYSICAL EMULATOR FOR A FLEXIBLE MANUFACTURING SYSTEM

Managing IT Projects. Chapter 2 The PMI Framework

Handbook on Test Development: Helpful Tips for Creating Reliable and Valid Classroom Tests. Allan S. Cohen. and. James A. Wollack

PROJECT RISK MANAGEMENT

Certification Preparation Course LATVIKON (R.E.P.)Centre

Continuous vs. Discontinuous Nature vs. Nurture

Assessment Policy. 1 Introduction. 2 Background

Certified Six Sigma Yellow Belt

Student Profile Template

Inspection judgements Key to judgements: Grade 1 is outstanding; grade 2 is good; grade 3 is requires improvement; grade 4 is inadequate

Monte Carlo analysis used for Contingency estimating.

Transcription:

IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Human Reliability Analysis Lecturer Lesson Lesson IV IV3_7.1 Workshop Information IAEA Workshop City, XX XX - City -XX, Country Month, Year Year

Human Reliability HUMAN RELIABILITY The probability of successful performance of only those human activities necessary to make a system reliable or available. HUMAN ERROR Human Error is simply some human output which is outside the tolerances established by the system requirements in which the person operates. IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making 1

Human Reliability Analysis What can happen, i.e., what can go wrong?. How likely is it that this will happen?. If it does happen, which are the consequenses?. IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making 2

Goal of Modeling the Human Performance for PSA To develop descriptive models to predict how well people will perform what they are supposed to do in normal and abnormal situations. It is not to understand human behavior and all the motivations behind it. A model of a system is an abstraction which reproduces (simulates) symbolically the way in which the system functions. IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making 3

Human HRA Model IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making 4

Human Error Categorisation ERRORS OF OMISSION Omits entite task. Omits a step in a task. 4 Selects wrong control. Selection error 4 Misposition of controls. 4 Issue wrong command on information. Errors of Sequence ERRORS OF COMMISSION Timing Errors 4 Too Early. 4 Too Late. Qualitative Errors 4 Too Little. 4 Too Much. IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making 5

Human Action Categories RUTINE Human actions explicitly included in documents (Procedures, Specification, etc ). COGNOSCITIVE Human actuations that require a cognitive process of understanding and decision making, previous to do an action. IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making 6

Performance Shaping Factors (PSF) Any factor that shapes (Influences) human performance. Less than adequate PSF - Higher human error probabilities. Categories of PSF s External. Stressor. Internal. IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making 7

Some PSF s s in Man-Machine Machine System IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making 8

Behaviour Types Skill based behaviour. Rule based behaviour. Knowledge based behaviour. IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making 9

Definitions of Skill-Based Based, Rule-Based Based, and Knowledge-Based Behaviour # Rasmussen, J., Human Errors. A Taxonomy for Describing Human Malfunction in Industrial Installations, Riso-M-2304, Riso National laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark, August 1981. IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making 10

Logic Tree to Aid in Selection of Expected Behaviour Types IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making 11

Human Action Classification TYPE 1 Before an initiating event, plant personnel can affect availability and safety either by inadvertantly disabling equipment, during testing or maintenance, or they can improve the availability of systems by restoring failed equipment through testing and maintenance. TYPE 2 By committing some error, plant personnel can initiate an accident. TYPE 3 By following procedures during the course of an accident, plant personnel can operate standby equipment that will terminate the accident. TYPE 4 Plant personnel, attempting to follow procedures, can make a mistake that aggravates the situation or fails to terminate the accident. TYPE 5 By improvising, plant personnel can restore and operate initial unavailable equipment to terminate an accident. IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making 12

Procedures SHARP (SYSTEMATIC HUMAN ACTION RELIABILITY PROCEDURE): EPRI-NP-3583 The SHARP methodology can be employed by the analyst as guidance to make assessments of human reliability, suitable for use in a PSA, Different techniques can be used within the SHARP framework, Innovation can be employed when current techniques are deemed insufficient for adequately addressing the case under study. IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making 13

SHARP Steps (1/2) 1. Definition To ensure that all human interactions are adequately considered in the study. 2. Screening To identify the human interactions that are significant to the operation and safety of the plant. 3. Breakdown To develop a detailed description of important human interactions by defining the key influence factors necessary to complete the modelling. The human interaction modelling consists of a representation (e.g., qualitative model), impact assessments and quantification. IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making 14

SHARP Steps (2/2) 4. Representation To select and apply techniques for modelling important human interactions in logic structures. Such methods help to identify additional significant human actions that might impact the system logic trees. 5. Impact Assessment To explore the impact of significant human actions identified in the preceding Step on the system logic trees. 6. Quantification To apply appropriate data or other quantification methods to assign probabilities for the various interactions examined, determine sensitivities and establish uncertainty ranges. 7. Documentation To include all necessary information for getting a traceable, understandable, and reproducible assessment. IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making 15

SHARP Flow Diagram IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making 16

Pathways for Quantification of Human Errror Probabilities REPRESENTATION MODEL/DATA IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making 17

Human Action Representation A Human Action Representation is a Logic Structure Used to Explain the Different Activities (Decision and/or Actuation) that the Operators Could do when they have to Respond to a Concret Situation : HRA Event Tree. Operator Action Tree, OAT. Expanded Operator Action Tree, EXOAT. Confusion Matrix. IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making 18

HRA Event Tree IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making 19

Operator Action Tree IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making 20

Expanded Operator Action Tree Representation IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making 21

Example of Confusion Matrix for Misdiagnosis of an Event IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making 22

Human Quantification Techniques Handbook of human reliability analysis (THERP) NUREG/CR-1278. Post event human decision errors, operator action tree/time reliability correlation. NUREG/CR-3010. Application of SLIM-MAUD. Human congnitive reliability model for PRA analysis EPRI Project RP 2170-3. IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making 23

Comparison of Quantification Techniques IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making 24

Error of Commission It is the consequence of a human action that is carried out inappropriately and causes that the situation will be worse than if the human action were not carried out. INTENT A Method for estimating human error probabilities for decision based errors. ATHEANA Technical basis and implementation guidelines for a technique for human event analysis. CREAM Cognitive reliability and error analysis method. HITLINE Human interaction time line. IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making 25

Conclusions Human actions are always important in the final results. Studying human behaviour and assign error probabilities is not easy but it is possible. There always will be human failures and errors but their amount and consequences may be limited by a good job. IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making 26