GMO Risk Assessment - EU experiences and recent developments



Similar documents
Plant Biotechnology Pipeline

Maize 1507: toxic and inadequately tested

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32013M6454

Seed companies experiences facing LLP issues

Technology Innovation in Agriculture

How To Know If Bee Health Is Affected By Bt Maize

Phillips McDougall. The cost and time involved in the discovery, development and authorisation of a new plant biotechnology derived trait

GENE CLONING AND RECOMBINANT DNA TECHNOLOGY


Review of GMOs under Research and Development and in the pipeline in Europe

Introduction to Evogene Ofer Haviv, President & CEO

How To Make A Drought Tolerant Corn

Life-Science Economics and Policy

Taming Major Maize Field Pests in Kenya: The Role of Biotechnology

Approvals of GMOs in the European Union Analysis Global Comparison Forward Projection Impacts Improvements

Agchems Stellar Growth Sustainable or Not?

Improving food security

Costa Rica's Ag Biotechnology Situation and Outlook

Environmental Monitoring

Annual monitoring report on the cultivation of MON 810 in 2013

Adoption of GE Crops by U.S. Farmers Increases Steadily

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No /.. of XXX

Potential synergies that can enhance Bt toxicity in SmartStax

Agronomic and environmental aspects of the cultivation of genetically modified herbicide-resistant plants

GMO CONTAMINATION PREVENTION

Determining the Use of Technology in World Food and Fiber Production

Page 1 Bayer CropScience Increase of productivity in Agriculture

Ecological models in chemical risk assessment Preliminary Recommendations of the SETAC Europe workshop MODELINK

Honduras. Agricultural Biotechnology Annual

What s wrong with GM?

Robert Nichols, Senior Director, Cotton Incorporated

BioBoot Camp Genetics

What are biofuels? Pocket K No. 24. Biotechnology for Green Energy: Biofuels

Indian Agrochemical Industry

How big companies and patents are hampering plant breeding

Biotech Foods Community Snapshot

Why Genetically Engineered (GE) Foods should be Labeled: Inadequate Regulations, Unanswered Safety Questions

A Review of the Environmental Safety of the CP4 EPSPS Protein

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Draft COMMISSION DECISION

Seed Industry Structure Is Characterized by Growth and Consolidation

EFSA meeting summary report EFSA AND GMO RISK ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN AND ANIMAL HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT September 2009, Brussels, Belgium

Patents on Seeds and Animals, Eggs & Bacon, Tomatoes and Melons

Glyphosate Levels in Breakfast Foods: What is safe?

Tailoring solutions for a region of diversity Global Press Conference 2013

THE SCIENCE THE FUTURE OF CANADIAN CANOLA: APPLY THE SCIENCE OF AGRONOMICS TO MAXIMIZE GENETIC POTENTIAL.

FAQs: Gene drives - - What is a gene drive?

Effect Of Amino Acids On Plants

Public Perceptions of Labeling Genetically Modified Foods

Impacts of Genetically-Modified Crops and Seeds on Farmers

Working definitions GENETICALLY MODIFIED (GM) CROPS, LOW LEVEL PRESENCE (LLP) AND ADVENTITIOUS PRESENCE (AP)

The use of genetically modified crops in developing countries

Annex 6: Nucleotide Sequence Information System BEETLE. Biological and Ecological Evaluation towards Long-Term Effects

d) Date of acknowledgement of notification Not available at the time of submission to EFSA.

Profiting from the Climate Crisis, undermining resilience in Africa: Gates and Monsanto s Water Efficient Maize for Africa (WEMA) Project

Genetically modified crops in Integrated Pest Management

CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC. Implementation of Sustainable Agricultural Initiatives

Rising Concentration in Agricultural Input Industries Influences New Farm Technologies

Recombinant DNA and Biotechnology

SULFUR AND MICRONUTRIENT RESPONSES ON CORN AND SOYBEANS George Rehm Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, St.

GUIDELINES FOR THE REGISTRATION OF BIOLOGICAL PEST CONTROL AGENTS FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS

Frequently Asked Questions about FAO and Agricultural Biotechnology. 5. What is FAO s position on release of GMOs in any specific country?

Financial Translation. Pierre Courduroux Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

CCR Biology - Chapter 9 Practice Test - Summer 2012

Andrew F. Roberts, Ph.D. Deputy Director, CERA. September 19, 2013

Chapter 23 Definitions of GMO/LMO and modern biotechnology. Three different definitions but the same legal interpretation?

GM crops: global socio-economic and environmental impacts

Speaker Summary Note

Pesticide Sprayer Cleanout

Manufacturing process of biologics

2014 Full Year Results

2015 Half Year Results Strong business performance leads to significant increase in profitability

Kenya. Agricultural Biotechnology Annual Kenya Agricultural Biotechnology Report

Transcription:

A future task in good hands GMO Risk Assessment - EU experiences and recent developments Beatrix Tappeser Head, Biosafety Division, BfN, Germany ENSSER - EEA Symposium on Science & Society 'Integrity of Science under Attack Kopenhagen, March 15-16, 2010

Prologue The German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN) Central scientific authority of the German federal government for national and international nature conservation and landscape management. Regulatory tasks Evaluation and performance of environmental risk assessment Evaluation and development of monitoring plans Evaluation of monitoring data one of the Competent authorities (CAs) under the German Genetic Engineering Act concerned with the regulation of genetically modified organisms on national and EU level lead authority Federal Office for consumer protection an food safety

Prologue The German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN) GMO-related scientific and collaborative tasks: Advancement of scientific tools for the environmental risk assessment Development of scientific concepts and advancement of Quelle: http:// / methods for the monitoring of GMOs Deliver scientific expertise and advise to the Ministry and the Federal States Cooperation with national and international research institutions

Topics of this presentation Cultivation in Europe applications and pipeline The current practice of environmental risk assessment Two current examples - MON 89034 x 88017 and MON 87460 The LLP project Conclusions

Planned Maize Cultivation in Europe Maize events applied for cultivation in Europe Monsanto YieldGard MON810 Insect resistance (corn borer, lepidopterans) Monsanto Roundup NK603 Herbicide tolerance Ready (to glyphosate) Stack NK603xMON810 Stack NK 603xMON 89034 Monsanto YieldGard VT MON88017 * Insect resistance (to coleopterans) Stack MON88017xMON 89034 Dow AgroSciences Herculex I 1507 Insect resistance Pioneer Hi-Bred, (to lepidopterans) Dow AgroSciences Herculex RW 59122 Insect resistence Pioneer Hi-Bred (to coleopterans) Stack 59122x1507 Stack 59177x1507xNK603 Syngenta Agrisure GT GA21 Herbicide tolerance (to glyphosate) Bayer CropScience T25 Herbicide tolerance Stein & Rodriguez-Cerezo, JRC, 2009 (to glufosinate)

GM maize pipeline Maize events authorised in at least one country but not yet commercialised in Europe Monsanto YieldGard VT PRO MON89034 * Insect resistance (to lepidopterans) Monsanto High lysine LY038 * Crop composition (high lysine content) Syngenta n/a 3272 * Crop composition (amylase content) Syngenta Agrisure MIR604 * Insect resistance (to coleopterans) Stein & Rodriguez-Cerezo, JRC, 2009

GM maize pipeline GM maize in the advanced R&D pipeline worldwide Monsanto n/a MON87754 Crop composition 2010 (high oleic content) Pioneer Hi-Bred Optimum n/a Insect resistance 2010 AcreMax 1 (to coleopterans) Monsanto n/a MON87460 Abiotic stress tolerance and BASF (to drought) 2012 Dow AgroSciences DHT n/a Herbicide tolerance 2012 n/a (India) n/a cry1ac + Insect resistance 2014 cp4epsp4 herbicide tolerance Syngenta n/a n/a Abiotic stress tolerance 2015 (to drought) BASF Plant Science NutriDense n/a Crop composition 2015 (protein, amino acid and Stein & Rodriguez-Cerezo, JRC, 2009 phytase content)

Soybean commercialisation Commercialised soybean events in at least one country Monsanto RoundupReady MON 40-3-2 Herbicide tolerance (to glyphosate) Monsanto RoundupReady 2 MON89788 Herbicide tolerance (to glyphosate) Bayer LibertyLink A2704-12 Herbicide tolerance CropScience (to glufosinate) Bayer LibertyLink A5547-127 * Herbicide tolerance CropScience (to glufosinate) Pioneer Hi-Bred Optimum GAT 356043 * Herbicide tolerance (to ALS inhibitors and glyphosate) Stein & Rodriguez-Cerezo, JRC, 2009

Soybean pipeline GM soybeans in the advanced R&D pipeline worldwide Syngenta n/a n/a Nematode resistance 2011 Monsanto Omega-3 MON87769 Crop composition 2012 (stearidonic acid content) Monsanto n/a n/a Herbicide tolerance 2012 (to dicamba) Monsanto n/a n/a Insect resistance and 2013 herbicide tolerance (to glyphosate) Dow AgroSciences DHT n/a Herbicide tolerance 2013 Monsanto Vistive III MON87754 Crop composition 2014 (high oleic content) Syngenta n/a n/a Herbicide tolerance 2014 (to HPPD inhibitors) Bayer CropScience n/a n/a Herbicide tolerance 2015 (to HPPD and glyphosate) Bayer CropScience n/a n/a Herbicide tolerance 2015 (to HPPD and glufosinate) Stein & Rodriguez-Cerezo, JRC, 2009

Pipeline characteristics New herbicide resistence, further stacking, some crop composition traits New Herbicide Traits: Dicamba mimics naturally occuring plant hormones (auxins), destroys tissue through uncontrolled cell division and growth DHT Dow AgroSciences Herbicide Traits, confer resistence to 2,4 D and fop herbicides fop herbicides are aryloxyphenoxypropionate fop grass herbicides HPPD inhibitors Hydroxyphenylpyruvate deoxygenase inhibitor, HPPD is important for tyrosine catabolism, tyrosine is important for protein building and plays an important role in photosynthesis ALS inhibitors Acetolactate synthase inhibitors

Current Practice of Environmental Risk Assessment http://www.bfn.de/0502_gentechnik.html?&no_cache=1

The Current Practice of Environmental Risk Assessment Main Shortcomings Focusing on the transgene and not on the GMO as a whole Transgene product testing mainly when pesticidal properties derived from a bacterial production source No tests on equivalence for the bacterial derived product and the GMO produced transgene product No description and integration of relevant aspects of representative receiving environments No adequate exposure analysis No or unsufficient integration of NTOs from

The Current Practice of Environmental Risk Assessment Main Shortcomings Pooling of data from field trials over several locations Data from one or maximal 2 vegetation periods only Plot size often not adequate No meaningful statistical evaluation No integration of species of conservation concern Toxicological assessment unsufficient

A current example MON 89034 x MON 88017 Traits and Scope of the Application Traits: Cry 1A.105 + Cry 2Ab2 = 89034 Cry 3Bb1 + epsps (glyphosate-resistence) = 88017 Scope Cultivation of MON 89034 x MON 88017 Seed production of MON 89034

A current example MON 87460 Drought tolerance Expresses prokaryotic CspB - cold shock protein Contains npt II Action very unspecific mode of action how drought tolerance is achieved not understood Binds to single stranded RNA influences expression of proteins by stabilizing the mrna for translation several provided studies used test, control or reference material contaminated with MON 87460 or maize NK 603

Low Level Presence the Dimension But as soon as a GMO is cultivated in a country that is exporting to the EU, even on a small scale, the repercussions can be big: for instance in the case of Herculex, the corresponding GM maize was grown on only one percent of the total maize acreage in the USA, but in approximately two thirds of all samples tested subsequently,traces of Herculex maize were found (Toepfer 2008). Stein & Rodriguez-Cerezo, JRC, 2009

Conclusions There is need of improvement of the RA on the conceptual and methodological side Receiving environments and especially protected areas and species of conservation concern need more attention Comparators and comparisons are of growing importance and difficulties Stacked genes and traits need new consideration - concerning i.a. different numbers of stacks and segregation patterns There is growing evidence of contaminated controls and test substances what is the impact on the validity of data in the RA?

A future task in good hands Thank you very much for your kind attention! Dr. Beatrix Tappeser Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, Germany Division II 3.3 GMO-Regulation, Biosafety http://www.bfn.de/0301_gentechnik.html