Defining your PICO Question. In: Patient or Problem or Risk Factor EXAMPLE: Does: Treatment A or Exposure A EXAMPLE: EXAMPLE: Outcome of interest



Similar documents
IPDET Module 6: Descriptive, Normative, and Impact Evaluation Designs

A Guide To Producing an Evidence-based Report

Guidelines for AJO-DO submissions: Randomized Clinical Trials June 2015

Developmental Research Methods and Design. Types of Data. Research Methods in Aging. January, 2007

18/11/2013. Getting the Searches off to a good start: Scoping the Literature and Devising a Search Strategy

Assessing the effectiveness of medical therapies finding the right research for each patient: Medical Evidence Matters

PEER REVIEW HISTORY ARTICLE DETAILS VERSION 1 - REVIEW. Avinesh Pillai Department of Statistics University of Auckland New Zealand 16-Jul-2015

Assessing study quality: critical appraisal. MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit

MIND-BODY THERAPIES FOR HYPERTENSION

Legal consequences for alcohol-impaired drivers injured in motor vehicle collisions: a systematic review

Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development - A Systematic Review

How To Write A Systematic Review

PCORI Methodology Standards: Academic Curriculum Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. All Rights Reserved.

Mary B Codd. MD, MPH, PhD, FFPHMI UCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy & Pop. Sciences

Effectiveness of Treatment Techniques for Substance Abuse in Occupational Therapy

What are observational studies and how do they differ from clinical trials?

If several different trials are mentioned in one publication, the data of each should be extracted in a separate data extraction form.

Biostat Methods STAT 5820/6910 Handout #6: Intro. to Clinical Trials (Matthews text)

TOOL. Project Progress Report

User Guide Thank you for purchasing the DX90

BASIC ELEMENTS OF GRANT WRITING

Prepared by:jane Healey ( 4 th year undergraduate occupational therapy student, University of Western Sydney

Objectives. Project Management Overview. Successful Project Fundamentals. Additional Training Resources

Single Manufacturing Site with. Extended Manufacturing Site(s)

TOOL. Project Progress Report

Comparison of Research Designs Template

Characteristics of studies

Depressive Disorders Inpatient Management v.1.1

GUIDELINES FOR REVIEWING QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTIVE STUDIES

Introduction to study design

Drugs for MS.Drug fact box cannabis extract (Sativex) Version 1.0 Author

California Lutheran University Information Literacy Curriculum Map Graduate Psychology Department

ASKING CLINICAL QUESTIONS

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP)

Evaluation Plan: Process Evaluation for Hypothetical AmeriCorps Program

Can I have FAITH in this Review?

NKR 33 Urininkontinens, PICO 3: Bør kvinder med urininkontinens tilbydes behandling

The Healthcare Leadership Model Appraisal Hub and 360 report. Facilitator user guide

English assessments in Key Stage 3 Notes and guidance

Assessment in the New National Curriculum

Form B-1. Inclusion form for the effectiveness of different methods of toilet training for bowel and bladder control

Evidence-Based Practice

Clinical Study Design and Methods Terminology

ChangingPractice. Appraising Systematic Reviews. Evidence Based Practice Information Sheets for Health Professionals. What Are Systematic Reviews?

Meeting the requirements of the Care Certificate is a challenge for all employers of health and social care support workers.

California Lutheran University Information Literacy Curriculum Map Graduate Psychology Department

Psychological outcomes for women following abortion. Dr Sharon Cameron Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh and Dean Terrace Centre, Edinburgh, UK


Village Activity: Beating Bullying

Identification. Preparation and formulation. Evaluation. Review and approval. Implementation. A. Phase 1: Project identification

Monitoring & Evaluation for Results. Reconstructing Baseline Data for Monitoring & Evaluation -Data Collection Methods-

The Cross-Sectional Study:

Database of randomized trials of psychotherapy for adult depression

Online Reading Support London School of Economics Sandra McNally

Breast cancer treatment for elderly women: a systematic review

Kansas Medical Assistance Programs Retrospective Drug Utilization Review Provider Education and Intervention Program

In an experimental study there are two types of variables: Independent variable (I will abbreviate this as the IV)

III. FREE APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION (FAPE)

PEER REVIEW HISTORY ARTICLE DETAILS TITLE (PROVISIONAL)

COGNITIVE ABILITIES TEST: FOURTH EDITION. Sample Reports SECONDARY.

WORDS THEIR WAY. Thursday- FREE CHOICE: See the attached page with Free Choice options and assist your child in completing this activity.

Evaluation: Designs and Approaches

Designing Clinical Addiction Research

Using the PRECEDE- PROCEED Planning Model PRECEDE-PROCEED P R E C E D E. Model for health promotion programming Best known among health scientists

Sustainability Policy Template

Higher Performing High Schools

Forging New Frontiers: Translating theory to practical health solutions in rural communities

Citation: Robertson, I.H., Gray, J.M., Pentland, B., & Waite, L.J. (1990). Microcomputerbased

7.S.8 Interpret data to provide the basis for predictions and to establish

Guidance for Peer Reviewers. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association (JAOA)

Alcohol screening and brief intervention in primary care: no evidence of efficacy for dependence

Basic Study Designs in Analytical Epidemiology For Observational Studies

Review of Interventions Aimed to:

Major Events Engagement Fund Information Pack 2013/17. March Status: Final Author: Katie Legg

AGILE Burndown Chart deviation - Predictive Analysis to Improve Iteration Planning

Maths Mastery in Primary Schools

NIMC VTE Prophylaxis Section Audit and Reporting Tool User Guide

RESEARCH STUDY PROTOCOL. Study Title. Name of the Principal Investigator

The Experimental Method

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY 2012

Robot-Assisted Stroke Rehabilitation

Evidence-Based Nursing Practice Toolkit

Critical appraisal of quantitative and qualitative research literature

Systematic Review Resource Package

Transcription:

Defining your PICO Question P = The Patient or Population Who will be the focus? EXAMPLE: In: Patient or Problem or Risk Factor I = Intervention or Exposure What is the Exposure or Treatment of interest? EXAMPLE: Does: Treatment A or Exposure A C = Comparison EXAMPLE: What will you compare the treatment to? Compared to: Treatment B O = Outcome EXAMPLE: What do you hope the treatment will do or change? Reduce: Outcome of interest Examples of finished PICO Questions: (Don t include the P, I, C, O write them as a sentence) In youth with psychosis do SGA s vs. FGA s result in fewer metabolic side effects? Do residents living within 1 mile of bridges painted with lead paint have higher rates of depression? Your PICO Question written in 1 sentence:

PICO: A Diamond in the Rough P= Patient, Population, Problem, Risk Factor I= Intervention or Exposure C= Comparison (if you have or want one) O= Outcome

PICO: A Diamond in the Rough P= Patient, Population, Problem, Risk Factor I= Intervention or Exposure C= Comparison (if you have or want one) O= Outcome

Search Tool Topic1 And Topic2 And Topic3 And Topic4 And Topic5 PICO Question:

Inclusion Criteria: Exclusion Criteria: Quality Criteria:

Flow Chart Template: Add or Remove Squares from Flow Chart depending on your searches and criteria: # of records identified through Medline database searching: # of records identified through CINAHL searching: # of records after duplicates removed: # of records reviewed: # of records screened: # of records excluded: Reason 1: Reason 2: Reason 3: # of records screened: # of records excluded by title: # of full-text articles assessed for eligibility: # of full-text articles excluded: # of articles included: # of articles excluded: # of articles included: # of articles included through citations: # of unique articles included:

Analyzing the Evidence: Study Design: Sample: Representative? Chosen in similar ways? If RCT randomly? Similar groups in important ways (other than exposure or treatment; Randomized) Methods: Was measurement of exposure or provision of interventions similarly managed in all groups? Was timing of exposure or intervention appropriate? Was blinding used? Was measurement appropriate? Were scales used validated? Outcome Assessment: How were outcomes assessed? Were assessors blind to exposure or intervention group? Was follow up period appropriate length? Analysis: Were appropriate tests used to evaluate outcomes? Adequate power? Effect Size? Were results significant? ITT analysis? Evaluation of Evidence: Is there any evidence supporting causation (dose-response; exposure preceded outcome; biologic explanation; consistent results) Are conclusions supported by data or evidence? How does this sample compare to your patient or population of interest? Would your patient or setting be open to this intervention? Are there alternatives available?

Data Extraction Tool Table of Relevant Papers or Evidence Entries should be concise/brief; include columns Specify what is important to your question Author (yr), country Example: Iennaco (2010) US Sample or Patient Group Setting N=7566 Heavy industrial workers 6 yr period Manufacturing plant (11 locations) Study type Retrospective cohort study Exposure/ intervention Effects of high demand, low control based on JCQ completed by plant managers Outcomes studied Depression diagnosis from health claims data Key results (include quantitative effect estimates) High demand significantly increases risk of depression dx OR: 1.39 (95% CI: 1.04-1.86) Low control not significant OR: 0.78 (95% CI: 0.56-1.08) Study strengths & weaknesses Comments Strengths: Large longitudinal study; uses objectively ascertained demand & control Limitations: Health claims data used; expect this is underestimate of depr cases

Implementation Planning Assessment: What is the Problem or Question? Why is it happening now? Who does it affect? -what is experienced? What information do you have about the problem? (i.e. data) What information do you need? How does the problem affect the surrounding systems? How is the organization involved? Pre-Planning: What are current practices r/t this problem? What are the best practices r/t this problem? How do the best practices found relate to your population? How would a change affect the system or organization? What else would need to be adjusted to integrate the best practice? How will you measure and use data to know baseline vs. post-intervention outcomes? Who must be involved in the planning? What is the goal of implementing change? Preparing for change: How will administration be involved? Are there training needs? What roadblocks do you expect? Identify the steps needed and a timeline for change. Planning the intervention or change: Engage all effected in problem solving Get input & feedback r/t plans Share results of data collection and evidence identified Revise plan based on clinical wisdom and feedback of participants Seek support of team Evaluation of Implementation: Outcome information Fidelity to best practice Costs Efficiency Sustainability Maintaining change Extending & Improving change Adaptation of best practice models