The Relationship Between Grain Yield and Silage Yield in Field Corn in Northern Illinois INTRODUCTION



Similar documents
Grain Sorghum Hybrid Tests in Tennessee

Corn Silage Gary Bates, Associate Professor, Plant and Soil Science

CORN IS GROWN ON MORE ACRES OF IOWA LAND THAN ANY OTHER CROP.

The High Plains Dairy Conference does not support one product over another and any mention herein is meant as an example, not an endorsement.

Fred Below & Adam Henninger. Crop Physiology Laboratory Department of Crop Sciences University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Yield Response of Corn to Plant Population in Indiana

Forage Economics, page2. Production Costs

Irrigation Scheduling on Small Grains using AZSCHED for Windows - Safford Agricultural Center, 2003

Uses and Abuses of NIR for Feed Analysis

Estimated Costs of Crop. Production in Iowa File A1-20 The estimated costs of corn, corn silage, Ag Decision Maker

Forage Sorghum Production Guide

298,320 3, ,825. Missouri Economic Research Brief FARM AND AGRIBUSINESS. Employment. Number of Agribusinesses.

CORN BY-PRODUCTS IN DAIRY COW RATIONS

Near-infrared spectroscopy on plot harvesters UVDLUFA V. Peter Tillmann, VDLUFA Kassel Christian Paul, FAL Braunschweig.

The estimated costs of corn, corn silage,

Evaluating Taking Prevented Planting Payments for Corn

Arkansas Corn. and Grain Sorghum Performance Tests. R.D. Bond J.A. Still D.G. Dombek

SULFUR AND MICRONUTRIENT RESPONSES ON CORN AND SOYBEANS George Rehm Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, St.

How Crop Insurance Works. The Basics

Number 389 February 15, 2013

Agri Analysis Inc OUR ANALYTICAL TESTING SERVICES

Information contained herein is available to all persons without regard to race, color, sex, or national origin.

Mid-Atlantic Grain and Forage Journal

Forage Crises? Extending Forages and Use of Non-forage Fiber Sources. Introduction

Hail Damaged Corn and Soybean

Understanding Feed Analysis Terminology

Corn and Soybean Production Calendar

Effect of corn silage kernel processing score on dairy cow starch digestibility

Nitrogen Management Guidelines for Corn in Indiana

Missouri Soybean Economic Impact Report

Nutrient and Fertilizer Value of Dairy Manure

Farmland Lease Analysis: Program Overview. Navigating the Farmland Lease Analysis program

Revenue and Costs for Corn, Soybeans, Wheat, and Double-Crop Soybeans, Actual for 2009 through 2015, Projected 2016

College of Agricultural Sciences Agricultural Research and Cooperative Extension

IDAHO ALFALFA VARIETY TRIALS 2013

Comparison of Weed Management Strategies with Roundup Ready Corn. J. A. Ferrell and W. W. Witt

How To Make A Drought Tolerant Corn

Grain Inventory Management

Evaluation of Combination Phosphorus Sulfur Fertilizer Products for Corn Production

Corn Stalks and Drought-Damaged Corn Hay as Emergency Feeds for Beef Cattle

Ethanol Usage Projections & Corn Balance Sheet (mil. bu.)

Distillers Grains for Beef Cattle

THE SCIENCE THE FUTURE OF CANADIAN CANOLA: APPLY THE SCIENCE OF AGRONOMICS TO MAXIMIZE GENETIC POTENTIAL.

Grouping to Increase Milk Yield and Decrease Feed Costs

Beef Cattle Feed Efficiency. Dan Shike University of Illinois

Is Lower Priced Urea a Bargain?

Sulfur Fertilization of Corn. Jeff Vetsch Univ. of Minnesota Southern Research and Outreach Center December 2013

Plant Physiology Critical Stages in the Life of a Corn Plant

Feeding Corn to Beef Cows

2016 FIELD CROP BUDGETS Publication 60

Soybean Growth and Development

Multiple Peril Crop Insurance

Determining nutrient needs

Guidelines for Estimating Wheat Straw Biomass Production Costs. Average Crop Residue Zone in Manitoba

ENERGY IN FERTILIZER AND PESTICIDE PRODUCTION AND USE

THE EVALUATION OF DISTILLERS CO-PRODUCTS IN DAIRY BEEF PRODUCTION

2016 Iowa Farm. Custom Rate Survey File A3-10 Many Iowa farmers hire custom machine work. Ag Decision Maker. Average Charge. Median Charge Range

Delayed Planting & Hybrid Maturity Decisions

Grass Legume Mixtures:

Grain Finishing Beef: Alternative Rations, Cattle Performance and Feeding Costs for Small Feeders

GRAIN SORGHUM PERFORMANCE TRIALS IN OKLAHOMA, 2011

Economics of Alfalfa and Corn Silage Rotations. Ken Barnett 1 INTRODUCTION

Revenue Risk, Crop Insurance and Forward Contracting

Harvesting Dry Bean John Nowatzki, NDSU Extension Agricultural Machine Systems Specialist

Grain Stocks Estimates: Can Anything Explain the Market Surprises of Recent Years? Scott H. Irwin

FLOOD DAMAGE LOSSES TO AGRICULTURAL CROPS IN COLORADO. Norman L. Dalsted, John Deering, Rebecca Hill, and Martha Sullins 1

FEEDING THE DAIRY COW DURING LACTATION

Estimating Cash Rental Rates for Farmland

A Business Newsletter for Agriculture. Vol. 12, No. 1 Energy agriculture - where s the nitrogen?

Concepts and Rationale for Regional Nitrogen Rate Guidelines for Corn

Federal Crop Insurance RISK MANAGEMENT. Chris Eddy Dell s Insurance Agency

Radishes as biofumigants and weed suppressant cover crops. Joel Gruver Western Illinois University

Contents. Acknowledgements... iv. Source of Data...v

CROP BUDGETS, ILLINOIS, 2015

PRODUCING WHEY SILAGE FOR GROWING

Agricultural Production and Research in Heilongjiang Province, China. Jiang Enchen. Professor, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Northeast

FUTURES TRADERS GUIDE TO THE WASDE

Will It Sprout? Seed Germination Test

Understanding CNCPS and CPM: Biology, Modeling, and Best Cost Applications for Balancing the Nutrient Requirements in Dairy Diets

Remote Sensing Applications for Precision Agriculture

Natural Air Drying Corn Paul E. Sumner University of Georgia Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department

Strategies for Diet Formulation with High Corn Prices

Heat of combustion (gross energy)

Transcription:

The Relationship Between Grain Yield and Silage Yield in Field Corn in Northern Illinois INTRODUCTION Corn silage is an important ingredient in dairy and beef rations. Acres of Illinois corn harvested for silage in 2004 were 110,000 and the yield was 20 tons per acre (Illinois Agricultural Statistics, 2005 Annual Summary). Determining a fair price for corn silage is difficult due to the many variable factors involved with this commodity. One approach has been to price corn silage based on grain value. In the past, a ton of corn silage standing in the field has been valued at 6.5 to 7 times the market price of a bushel of corn (6.5 to 7 bushels of corn grain per ton of silage). For stored silage, a value of 10 times the market price of a bushel has been used. With genetic improvements that have been made in the yield potential of hybrids, the guideline for the number of bushels of grain per ton of silage may need to be adjusted upward. This study was conducted to determine if such an adjustment is warranted. MATERIALS AND METHODS A 3-year study (2002-2004) to determine the relationship between grain yield and silage yield in field corn was conducted at the Northern Illinois Agronomy Research Center, Shabbona (DeKalb County) on Flanagan silt loam (154) soil. 10 grain hybrids (Table 1) ranging from 103- to 113-day maturity were planted each year in eight, 30-inch rows with four replicates. Stands were thinned to 32,000 plants per acre. Table 1. Hybrids grown by year. Hybrid 2002 2003 2004 Hybrid 2002 2003 2004 Asgrow 718 RR/YG X X X Pioneer 33G26 X X X DeKalb 53-34 RR/YG X Pioneer 34B23 X DeKalb 58-78 YG X Pioneer 34B24 YG X X DeKalb 58-80 RR/YG X Pioneer 34M95 YG X DeKalb 60-12 YGRW X Pioneer 35NO5 YG X Golden Harvest 8906 X X X Pioneer 36B08 X X LG Seeds 2533 X X X Syngenta 60-N2 X Pioneer 33G29 YG/LL X Syngenta N45-T5 X X Pioneer 33G30 YG X X X The previous crop was soybean. The corn received 180 pounds of nitrogen per acre either preplant or early side dress. Planting dates were May 8 (2002), April 29 (2003), and May 3 (2004). The middle two rows of the four rows on one side of each plot were harvested for silage yield, and the middle two rows of the other four rows in the plot were harvested later for grain yield. Silage harvest dates were September 13 (2002), September 18 (2003), and September 21 (2004). Plants for silage yield were hand-harvested, leaving a 6-inch stubble, and processed University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Science United States Department of Agriculture Local Extension Councils Cooperating University of Illinois Extension provides equal opportunities in programs and employment. 1

using a chipper shredder (Sears brand, 8.5 horsepower) to simulate a forage chopper. Prior to chopping, the kernel milkline in two ears per plot was visually estimated. A grab sample was collected for near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) analysis. Grain yield data were taken by machine harvest. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Grain and silage yield averaged over all hybrids and years are shown in Table 2. Table 2. Grain and silage yield. Factor Average Value Range Bushels of corn grain (15% moisture) per ton (35% 8.3 bu./ton 5.8 to 11.4 bu./ton dry matter) of corn silage Bushels of corn grain (15% moisture) per ton (100% 23.7 bu./ton 16.4 to 30.0 bu./ton dry matter) of corn silage Corn grain yield (15% moisture), bushels per acre 208.4 bu./acre 161.7 to 258.6 bu./acre Corn silage yield (35% dry matter), tons per acre 25.5 tons/acre 19.1 to 38.3 tons/acre Corn silage yield (100% dry matter), tons per acre 8.9 tons/acre 6.7 to 13.4 tons/acre 64 (55%) of the observations had between 7.5 and 9 bushels of corn grain (15% moisture) per ton of 35% dry matter silage (Figure 1). Figure 1. Distribution of bushels of corn per ton of silage (35% dry matter) over all plots. Frequency 25 20 15 10 5 0 < 5.5 5.5 to 6 N = 117 6 to 6.5 6.5 to 7 7 to 7.5 7.5 to 8 8 to 8.5 8.5 to 9 Bushels corn / ton 35% DM silage 9 to 9.5 9.5 to 10 > 10 Silage quality results averaged over all hybrids and years are shown in Table 3. Table 3. Silage quality averaged over hybrids and years. Trait Average Value Range Dry matter, % 42.5 28.8 to 54.2 Crude protein, % 6.9 4.6 to 8.9 ADF, % 22.9 16.7 to 29.7 NDF, % 42.6 32.5 to 53.9 Lignin, % 2.19 1.39 to 3.54 IVDMD, % 72.5 64.1 to 78.4 2

Five of the total of ten hybrids grown were in the study all three years (Table 1). Although the objective of the study was not to compare hybrids, statistical analysis (SAS and the resulting LSD, 0.05) revealed the following about these five hybrids (data not shown but available from the lead author). There was no significant difference between the hybrids in yield of 35% dry matter silage and cell wall digestibility. Significant differences among these five hybrids existed for grain yield, 100% dry matter silage yield, bushels of grain per ton of silage, and silage quality. For all hybrids, silage quality traits were not highly correlated to grain yield and silage yield (Table 4). Table 4. Correlations between silage quality traits and yield. Quality and Yield Traits Correlation (r) Silage moisture to silage yield (tons/acre) -0.349 Crude protein to silage yield (tons/acre) -0.019 ADF to silage yield (tons/acre) 0.006 NDF to silage yield (tons/acre) 0.056 IVDMD to silage yield (tons/acre) -0.115 Cell wall digestibility to silage yield (tons/acre) -0.115 Cell wall digestibility to grain yield (bu./acre) -0.283 Starch (%) to silage yield (tons/acre) 0.027 Starch (%) to grain yield (bu./acre) 0.219 The correlation of grain yield to silage yield per acre for all hybrids was 0.500 (Figure 2). Figure 2. Correlation between grain yield and silage yield in individual plots. 250 R 2 = 0.251 N = 116 Grain yield, bu/acre 225 200 175 150 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Silage yield, tons DM per acre 3

The correlation of bushels of grain per ton to silage yield per acre was -0.723 (Figure 3). Figure 3. Correlation between bushels of grain per ton of silage and silage yield. Bushels of grain / ton 35% DM silage 11.0 10.0 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 15 20 25 30 35 40 35% DM silage yield, tons per acre R 2 = 0.522 N = 110 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Data from ten corn grain hybrids grown for 3 years reconfirmed the fact that whole plant moisture cannot be accurately predicted from the location of the kernel milkline (r = -0.346). Silage quality traits were not highly correlated with grain yield or silage yield. The correlation of grain yield to silage yield was 0.500, indicating that choosing a hybrid for high grain yield tended to mean higher silage yield, but that is relationship is not very strong. The strong negative correlation between bushels of grain per ton and silage yield per acre (r = -0.723) indicates that hybrids with high silage yield do not increase their grain yields to match this higher tonnage. Averaged over all hybrids and years, there were nearly 8.3 bushels of corn (15% moisture) per ton of 35% dry matter silage. The three-year median value was 8.2 bushels. The average grain yield was 208 bushels (15% moisture) per acre. The study indicated that in high yielding environments in northern Illinois, the guideline of 6.5 to 7 bushels of shell corn per ton of corn silage (35% dry matter) should be increased to 8 to 8.25 bushels per ton, especially for hybrids that produce high grain yields. However, 23% of the samples had more than 9 bushels per ton, and 22% of the samples were less than 7.5 bushels of shell corn per ton of silage. 4

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Dave Lindgren, Farm Foreman, Northern Illinois Agronomy Research Center, Shabbona Financial Support from Northwestern Illinois Forage & Grassland Council In-Kind Support from Agri-King Inc., Fulton, IL Jim Morrison, Extension Educator, Crop Systems, University of Illinois Extension Dr. Emerson Nafziger, Extension Specialist, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois Lyle Paul, Agronomist, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois REVISED August 11, 2006 5