Guidance for the format and content of the protocol of non-interventional post-authorisation safety studies



Similar documents
Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

Post-authorisation safety studies and the EU PAS Register

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

EU PAS Register Guide

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

Questions & answers on signal management

Questions and answers on post approval change management protocols

Questions and answers on post approval change management protocols

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

COMMITTEE FOR VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS GUIDELINE FOR THE CONDUCT OF POST-MARKETING SURVEILLANCE STUDIES OF VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

EU Clinical Trials Register. An agency of the European Union

BEST PRACTICE GUIDE for Handling of Periodic Safety Update Reports

Submission of comments on 'Policy 0070 on publication and access to clinical-trial data'

EudraVigilance stakeholder change management plan

End of consultation (deadline for comments) 14 October Adoption by Committee for advanced therapies 15 October 2010

Reflection paper for laboratories that perform the analysis or evaluation of clinical trial samples

Seminario SSFA. New Guideline on Good Pharmacovigilance Practice (GVP) Fare clic per modificare lo stile del sottotitolo dello schema

Guideline on Process Validation

Strategy and pilot phase for patient registries

Reflection paper on non-spontaneous adverse event reports (peer-reviewed literature, internet and social media)

Standard operating procedure

Questions and answers on preparation, management and assessment of periodic safety update reports (PSURs)

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) DRAFT. Guideline on Risk Management Systems for Medicinal Products for Human Use

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

Pharmacovigilance System Master File (PSMF), QPPV and audits

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE ON RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)

One-year report on human medicines pharmacovigilance tasks of the European Medicines Agency

PHV- 4 version 1 ELECTRONIC ADVERSE DRUG REACTION REPORTING

Standard operating procedure

Stakeholder Meeting, 7 th June 2013 An inspector s perspective considerations for patient support and reimbursement programmes

How to search the EU Clinical Trials Register

EphMRA Adverse Event Reporting Guidelines 2015

The Clinical Trials Regulation EU No 536/2014: and Phase I trials

Draft agreed by Pharmacokinetics Working Party January Adoption by CHMP for release for consultation 17 February 2011

EphMRA Adverse Event Reporting Guidelines 2013

European Medicines Agency decision

EMA esignature capabilities: frequently asked questions relating to practical and technical aspects of the implementation

Adoption by CHMP for release for consultation November End of consultation (deadline for comments) 31 March 2011

Distant/virtual pharmacovigilance inspections of MAHs during a crisis situation- Points to consider

GCP INSPECTORS WORKING GROUP <DRAFT> REFLECTION PAPER ON EXPECTATIONS FOR ELECTRONIC SOURCE DOCUMENTS USED IN CLINICAL TRIALS

Compilation of Community Procedures on Inspections and Exchange of Information

The information contained in these slides is for general purposes only and presents the state of knowledge at November 30, 2011

Draft Agreed by Pharmacokinetics Working Party January End of consultation (deadline for comments) 31 May 2011

Reflection paper on clinical aspects related to tissue engineered products

Reflection paper on the Use of Interactive Response Technologies (Interactive Voice/Web Response Systems) in Clinical Trials

Guidance notes. for Patient Safety and Pharmacovigilance in Patient Support Programmes

ICH guideline Q8, Q9 and Q10 - questions and answers volume 4

Regulatory approval routes in the European System for Medicinal Products

Quick Response (QR) codes in the labelling and package leaflet of centrally authorised 1 medicinal products

COMMITTEE FOR PROPRIETARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CPMP) COMMITTEE FOR VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CVMP)

Guideline on stability testing for applications for variations to a marketing authorisation

Standard operating procedure

The EU Clinical Trial Regulation A regulator s perspective

University of Hawai i Human Studies Program. Guidelines for Developing a Clinical Research Protocol

RAPID ALERT SYSTEM (RAS) IN PHARMACOVIGILANCE

Template for essential information to be provided for proposals including clinical trials / studies / investigations

ICH guideline Q10 on pharmaceutical quality system

Guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing biotechnology-derived proteins as active substance: quality issues (revision 1)

ICH guideline E2C (R2) Periodic benefit-risk evaluation report (PBRER)

Clinical trials regulation

Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP)

Adoption by GCP Inspectors Working Group for consultation 14 June End of consultation (deadline for comments) 15 February 2012

POST-AUTHORISATION GUIDANCE. Human Medicinal Products

GUIDELINES FOR REVIEWING QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTIVE STUDIES

Guidance on format of the risk management plan (RMP) in the EU in integrated format

Reflection Paper on Medicinal Product Supply Shortages Caused by Manufacturing/GMP Compliance Problems

Good practice guide on recording, coding, reporting and assessment of medication errors

The New EU Clinical Trial Regulation Potential Impacts on Sites

MHRA GMP Data Integrity Definitions and Guidance for Industry January 2015

The EU portal and database

Opinion/ Commission. Notification. Decision. Issued 2 / affected 3 amended on. 30/07/2015 Annex II, Labelling and PL

Reflection paper on expectations for electronic source data and data transcribed to electronic data collection tools in clinical trials

Guideline on missing data in confirmatory clinical trials

Guideline on Detection and Management of Duplicate Individual Cases and Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs)

All the steps detailed in this WIN are carried out by the assistant in the Sampling and Testing Team in the MQC Section.

MHRA GMP Data Integrity Definitions and Guidance for Industry March 2015

Summary of the role and operation of NHS Research Management Offices in England

Risk management plans an overview

How To Write A Systematic Review

Guidance notes on collection of drug safety information by employees and agents of pharmaceutical companies

Annex VI Service Level Agreement for Medical Service Provider

Managing & Validating Research Data

Compilation of Community Procedures on Inspections and Exchange of Information

Guidelines for AJO-DO submissions: Randomized Clinical Trials June 2015

QRD recommendations on pack design and labelling for centrally authorised non-prescription human medicinal products

Adopted by CHMP in November Revision 1.0 adopted by CHMP on 25 June 2009

Capital Works Construction Project. [Insert Project Title] [Insert Sponsoring Agency]

Working Party on Control of Medicines and Inspections. Final Version of Annex 15 to the EU Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice

Detailed guidance AEs reporting in clinical trials ( CT-3 ) Stefano Bonato, M.D. Pharmacovigilance Country Head Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals

REGULATION (EEC) No 2309/93

EMA pharmacovigilance system manual

EU DIRECTIVE ON GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE IN CLINICAL TRIALS DH & MHRA BRIEFING NOTE

Subject: No. Page PROTOCOL AND CASE REPORT FORM DEVELOPMENT AND REVIEW Standard Operating Procedure

GUIDELINE ON THE SUBMISSION OF RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN DOCUMENTS

Transcription:

26 September 2012 EMA/623947/2012 Patient Health Protection Guidance for the format and content of the protocol of non-interventional post-authorisation Introduction From 10 January 2013, marketing authorisation holders have the obligation to comply with the format and content of the study protocol for post-authorisation (PASS), as specified in Art 36 to 38 and Art 40 of the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 520/2012. Use of the format is encouraged for PASS protocols submitted before that date. This document provides guidance for drafting the study protocols for non-interventional PASS in order to support consistency of the presentation and information provided. The template is based on Art 38 of Implementing Regulation No 520/2012 with the additional instructions of Module VIII of the Good pharmacovigilance practices. For interventional PASS, instructions provided in Volume 10 of the Rules Governing Medicinal products in the European Union should be followed. The study protocol should be concise, while providing the information needed to understand how the study will answer the research question and assess the validity of the study design. All headings and sub-headings of the format presented in this guidance should always be included and the same numbering should be used. Additional sub-headings can be added as necessary. Where a heading or sub-heading does not apply to the study (eg. Protection of human subjects), Not applicable should be stated with a short justification. All dates should be indicated in the format DD Month YYYY (e.g. 24 June 2012). Annex 1 should be used to list stand-alone documents not included in the protocol, e.g. contact details of responsible parties and all investigators, or sections 9.6. Data management, 9.8. Quality control and 10. Protection of human subjects, which can be maintained apart from the study protocol where they 7 Westferry Circus Canary Wharf London E14 4HB United Kingdom Telephone +44 (0)20 7418 8400 Facsimile +44 (0)20 7418 8668 E-mail info@ema.europa.eu Website www.ema.europa.eu An agency of the European Union European Medicines Agency, 2012. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.

represent standard procedures applied to all studies. In this case, a summary should be provided in the corresponding section of the protocol and reference should be made to Annex 1. Annexes can be added to provide documents referred to in the protocol. The text in green italics is intended to guide the reader on the principal points to be considered for writing that section of the protocol. It should be deleted if this guidance is used as a template. It is reminded that the marketing authorisation holder(s) involved should keep a copy of the protocol signed by the qualified person in pharmacovigilance (QPPV) or his/her delegate (with the date of the signature)available for any future request or inspection. For questions on this guidance, please contact p-pvhelpdesk@ema.europa.eu with the Subject Questions on template for PASS submission. This guidance may be later revised based on experience. EMA/623947/2012 Page 2/10

PASS information PASS information should be provided in a table on the title page of the study protocol. Title Protocol version identifier of last version of protocol EU PAS register number Active substance Medicinal product Product reference Procedure number Marketing authorisation holder(s) Informative title including a commonly used term indicating the study design and the medicinal product, substance or drug class concerned Number Registration number in the EU PAS register; indicate Study not registered if the study has not been registered in the EU PAS register. List of pharmacotherapeutic group(s) (ACT codes) and active substance(s) subject to the study List of centrally authorised medicinal product(s) and/or, if possible, of nationally authorised products subject to the study Reference number(s) of centrally authorised products and/or, if possible, of nationally authorised products subject to the study If applicable, Agency or national procedure number(s), e.g. EMA/X/X/XXX Marketing authorisation holder(s) which initiate(s), manage(s) or finance(s) the study Joint PASS Research question and objectives Country(-ies) of study Author Yes or No Summary of the research question and main objectives List of countries where the study is to be conducted; if countries have not been identified yet, or if the list is not complete, this should be stated Name and contact details of the main author of the study protocol EMA/623947/2012 Page 3/10

Marketing authorisation holder(s) Marketing authorisation holder(s) MAH contact person Name, address and contact details of the marketing authorisation holder(s). Contact person for this PASS protocol submission (if this a joint PASS, only one person should be mentioned) 1. Table of contents The study protocol should include a table of contents. The following table of contents can be used if this guidance serves as a template (select the table of content and press F9 to update the page numbers). 1. Table of contents... 4 2. List of abbreviations... 5 3. Responsible parties... 5 4. Abstract... 5 5. Amendments and updates... 6 6. Milestones... 6 7. Rationale and background... 6 8. Research question and objectives... 7 9. Research methods... 7 9.1. Study design... 7 9.2. Setting... 7 9.3. Variables... 7 9.4. Data sources... 8 9.5. Study size... 8 9.6. Data management... 8 9.7. Data analysis... 8 9.8. Quality control... 8 9.9. Limitations of the research methods... 9 9.10. Other aspects... 9 EMA/623947/2012 Page 4/10

10. Protection of human subjects... 9 11. Management and reporting of adverse events/adverse reactions... 9 12. Plans for disseminating and communicating study results... 9 13. References... 9 Annex 1. List of stand-alone documents... 10 Annex 2. ENCePP checklist for study protocols... 10 Annex 3. Additional information... 10 2. List of abbreviations List of main abbreviations used in the study protocol 3. Responsible parties List of all main responsible parties, including the principal investigator, a coordinating investigator for each country in which the study is to be performed and other relevant study sites. Contact details and the list of all investigators can be kept in a stand-alone document to be listed in Annex 1 and to be available upon request. In case of a Joint PASS, any sharing of responsibilities (eg. for management of adverse events) or distribution of tasks between marketing authorisation holders and other responsible parties should be mentioned in this section. Contact persons for each marketing authorisation holder should be mentioned. 4. Abstract Stand-alone summary of the study protocol including all of the subsections below. Title The title should include subtitles including version and date of the protocol and name and affiliation of main author Rationale and background Research question and objectives Study design Population Population includes the setting and study population. Variables Data sources Study size EMA/623947/2012 Page 5/10

Data analysis Milestones 5. Amendments and updates Write None or indicate any substantial amendment and update to the study protocol after the start of data collection in a table as indicated below. Number Section of study protocol Amendment or update Reason 1 Text Text Text 2 Text Text Text Text Text Text 6. Milestones Planned dates for study milestones should be indicated in a table as indicated below. Milestones between <> are optional and should be included only if applicable. Start of data collection and End of data collection are defined in Module VIII of the GVP (where the study uses data from existing electronic databases such as claims, prescriptions or health care records, secondary use of data applies to these definitions). Other important timelines can be added. Milestone Start of data collection End of data collection <Study progress report 1> <Study progress report 1> <Study progress report 1> <Interim report 1> <Interim report 1> <Interim report 1> <Registration in the EU PAS register> Final report of study results Planned date 7. Rationale and background Short description of the safety hazard(s), the safety profile or the risk management measures that led to the initiation or imposition of EMA/623947/2012 Page 6/10

the study, and short critical review of available published and unpublished data to explain gaps in knowledge that the study is intended to fill. The review may encompass relevant animal and human experiments, clinical studies, vital statistics and previous epidemiologic studies. The review should cite the findings of similar studies, and the expected contribution of the current study. 8. Research question and objectives Research question that explains how the study will address the issue which led to the study being initiated or imposed, and research objectives, including any pre-specified hypotheses and main summary measures. Objectives should be organised as primary or secondary objectives where applicable. 9. Research methods Description of the research methods, including: 9.1. Study design Overall research design and rationale for this choice, specifying the study design proposed (cohort, case-control, etc.) and any comparison groups. The primary and secondary endpoints and the main measure(s) of effect should be mentioned. The strength of the study design to answer the research question may be explained in this section. 9.2. Setting Setting and study population defined in terms of persons, place, study time period, and selection criteria, including the rationale for any exclusion criteria and their impact on the number of subjects available for analysis. Plans for baseline visits and follow-up visits should be described. Representativeness of the study population as regards the source population should be addressed. Where any sampling from a source population is undertaken, description of the source population and details of sampling methods should be provided. Where the study design is a systematic review or a meta-analysis, the criteria for the selection and eligibility of studies should be explained. 9.3. Variables Definition of exposures, outcomes, and other variables including measured risk factors, co-morbidities, co-medications, etc. with operational definitions and measurement; potential confounding variables and effect modifiers should be specified. EMA/623947/2012 Page 7/10

9.4. Data sources Strategies and data sources for determining exposures, outcomes and all other variables relevant to the study objectives, such as potential confounding variables and effect modifiers. Where the study is based on secondary analysis an existing data source, such as electronic health records or claims databases, any information on the validity of the recording and coding of the data should be reported. For exposures or outcomes not previously validated, validation performed in the study should be described or otherwise addressed. Linkage methods between data sources should be described as appropriate. If data collection methods or instruments are tested in a pilot study, plans for the pilot study should be presented. If a pilot study has already been performed, a summary of the results should be reported. Involvement of any expert committees to validate diagnoses should be stated. In case of a systematic review or meta-analysis, the search strategy and processes and any methods for confirming data from investigators should be described. 9.5. Study size Any projected study size, precision sought for study estimates and any calculation of the sample size that can minimally detect a prespecified risk with a pre-specified statistical precision. All assumptions used to calculate the study size or precision of the study should be presented and justified. 9.6. Data management Data management and statistical software(s) to be used in the study, including procedures for data collection, retrieval, collection and preparation. Data collection methods and tools (e.g. paper-based or electronic case reporting forms, monitoring if any and supervision) can be summarised in this section and fully described or presented in an Annex. 9.7. Data analysis Rationale for the choice of statistical techniques and major steps that lead from raw data to a final result, including methods used to correct inconsistencies or errors, impute values, modify raw data, categorise, analyse and present results, and procedures to control sources of bias and their influence on results. Statistical procedures to be applied to the data to obtain point estimates and confidence intervals of measures of occurrence or association, and sensitivity analyses. 9.8. Quality control Description of any mechanisms and procedures to ensure data quality and integrity, including accuracy and legibility of collected data and EMA/623947/2012 Page 8/10

original documents, extent of source data verification and validation of endpoints, storage of records and archiving of the statistical programming performed to generate the results. As appropriate, certification and/or qualifications of any supporting laboratory or research groups should be included. 9.9. Limitations of the research methods Any potential limitations of the study design, data sources, and analytic methods, including issues relating to confounding, bias, generalisability, and random error. The likely success of efforts taken to reduce errors should be discussed. 9.10. Other aspects Any other aspect of the research method not covered by the previous sections. 10. Protection of human subjects Safeguards in order to comply with national and European Union requirements for ensuring the well-being and rights of participants in non-interventional post-authorisation. 11. Management and reporting of adverse events/adverse reactions Procedures for the collection, management and reporting of individual cases of adverse events/adverse reactions (see GVP Module VI) and of any new information that might influence the evaluation of the benefitrisk balance of the product while the study is being conducted. For studies where reporting is not required, this should be stated. Any arrangements made between marketing authorisation holders for the management and reporting of adverse events/reactions in Joint PASS should be specified. 12. Plans for disseminating and communicating study results Any plans for submission of progress reports and final reports; any arrangements made between marketing authorisation holders for the disseminating and communicating study results of Joint PASS. 13. References Numbered list of literature or electronic references of documents referred to in the protocol. Sufficient information should be provided to allow retrieval of the document. EMA/623947/2012 Page 9/10

Annex 1. List of stand-alone documents Documents listed in Annex 1 can be maintained separately from the study protocol. They should be clearly identifiable and provided on request. Write None if there is no document or list documents in a table as indicated below. Number Document reference number Title 1 Number Text 2 Number Text Number text Annex 2. ENCePP checklist for study protocols A copy of the ENCePP Checklist for Study protocols available at http://www.encepp.eu/standards_and_guidances/index.html completed and signed by the main author of the study protocol should be included in Annex 2. The checklist will facilitate the review of the protocol and evaluation of whether investigators have considered important methodological aspects. In question 9.5 of the Checklist, Revision 1: Study start means Start of data collection Study progress means Progress report(s) Study completion means End of data collection Reporting means Final report of the study results Annex 3. Additional information Additional annexes may be included if necessary. EMA/623947/2012 Page 10/10