Instructional Coaching Field Guide



Similar documents
To expand teachers use of a variety of resources to improve instruction

THE FRAMEWORK FOR INSTRUCTIONAL COACH ENDORSEMENT GUIDELINES PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Self-Assessment Duval County School System. Level 3. Level 3. Level 3. Level 4

Chapter 2: Creating a coaching program

NEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS

EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM Recognition. Standards:

Comprehensive Reading Plan K-12 A Supplement to the North Carolina Literacy Plan. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction

The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support

Promising Practices and Implementation Tools

Running head: GAPPS PART A - PROFESSIONAL LEARNING CURRENT 1

Autism Spectrum Disorder Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria Rubric

Technical Assistance Paper

TOOL KIT for RESIDENT EDUCATOR and MENT OR MOVES

Principal Practice Observation Tool

The power of beliefs and assumptions

ON THE SAME PAGE EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF COLLEGE- AND CAREER-READY STANDARDS THROUGH LABOR-MANAGEMENT COLLABORATION

WV School Counseling Program Audit

EDUC 605 Curriculum Development and Assessment.. 3 cr

Possible examples of how the Framework For Teaching could apply to Instructional Coaches

Highly Qualified Teacher Component JUNE 2016

ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARDS (2013)

Masters Comprehensive Exam and Rubric (Rev. July 17, 2014)

Crosswalk of the New Colorado Principal Standards (proposed by State Council on Educator Effectiveness) with the

Correlation Map of LEARNING-FOCUSED to Marzano s Evaluation Model

Teachers as Learners: Elements of Effective Professional Development

Silicon Valley Mathematics Initiative Student Focused Math Content Coaching

The Ohio Resident Educator Program Standards Planning Tool Final

Classroom Teacher, Prekindergarten Teacher & Student Support Teacher

Educational Leadership Program Standards. ELCC Revised Standards

on the data Lyn Sharratt and Michael Fullan

Arizona School Counselor Evaluation Rubric

School & Program Guide. A Family Centered Public Cyber Charter School

Pre-Requisites EDAM-5001 Early Literacy Guiding Principles and Language

FRAMEWORK OF SUPPORT: SCHOOL-LEVEL PRACTICE PROFILE

Requirements EDAM WORD STUDY K-3: PRINT AWARENESS, LETTER KNOWLEDGE, PHONICS, AND HIGH FREQUENCY WORDS

ILLINOIS CERTIFICATION TESTING SYSTEM

MCD OUTCOME COMPONENT SCHOOL PLAN

Ch. 4: Four-Step Problem Solving Model

Kentucky. Guidelines. Digital Learning. Kentucky Department of Education. Dr. Terry Holliday, Commissioner

Results Snapshot: The SIOP Model

Framework and Guidelines for Principal Preparation Programs

Does coaching work? Can mathematics coaches make a difference?

Executive Summary. Florida Connections Academy. Ms. Marcie Trombino 5401 S. Kirkman Road Suite 550 Orlando, FL 32819

Literacy Coaching/ Reading Specialists

Framework for Leadership

EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM Recognition. Standards:

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: A VISION FOR SAUDI SCIENCE TEACHERS

PART Ed 512 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN AND RECERTIFICATION

Assessment That Drives Instruction

Executive Summary. Colorado Connections Academy. Mr. Tim Carlin, Principal 8 Inverness Drive E, suite 240 Englewood, CO 80112

Corrective Action Plan for Michael R. White STEM School

Section 7: The Five-Step Process for Accommodations for English Language Learners (ELLs)

Additional Qualification Course Guideline Reading, Specialist

USING DATA TO INFORM INSTRUCTION AND PERSONALIZE LEARNING

Utah Educational Leadership Standards, Performance Expectations and Indicators

AND FAST EASY. Creating Effective District Professional Development Plans. A Learning Paper

CALIFORNIA PRELIMINARY ADMINISTRATIVE CREDENTIAL EXAMINATION (CPACE)

Key Principles for ELL Instruction (v6)

MTSS Implementation Components Ensuring common language and understanding

Candidates will demonstrate ethical attitudes and behaviors.

EDUC SPECIAL EDUCATION: PART I (Six-Credit Course) Additional Qualification Course Distance Study Revised: May, 2011

READ 180 Aligns to Enhancing Education Through Technology Criteria (With Professional Development from Scholastic Red )

READING WITH. Reading with Pennsylvania Reading Specialist Certificate

School-based Support Personnel

ty School District Digita al Classrooms Plan

Springfield Public Schools English Language Learner Recommended Actions and Implementation Plans

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: Occupational Therapists

Quick Reference Guide Ohio Standards for Professional Development

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: Audiologists

Standards for Professional Development

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH GEORGIA College of Education. MGED 4015 Internship 3: Decision Making Fall 2014

APPENDIX A: Examples of Observations and Documentation

Instructional Coaching Model

Commission on Teacher Credentialing. Education Specialist Clear Program Standards

The information and application for completing the Coaching and Mentoring models application is available to you from several sources:

Additional Qualification Course Guideline Special Education, Specialist

Educational Leadership and Policy Studies Ritchie Program for School Leaders & Executive Leadership for Successful Schools (ELSS)

TEACHER CERTIFICATION STUDY GUIDE THE LIBRARY MEDIA PROGRAM

Elementary Math Methods Syllabus

Education Leadership (ISLLC) Standards Comparison of Old (2007) and New Standards (2015)

A GUIDE TO. Comprehensive Professional Development Planning

Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System. Teacher Evaluation Process Manual

Assessment METHODS What are assessment methods? Why is it important to use multiple methods? What are direct and indirect methods of assessment?

State University of New York Charter Renewal Benchmarks Version 5.0, May 2012

6 Essential Characteristics of a PLC (adapted from Learning by Doing)

RUBRICS FOR ASSESSING MASTER S LEVEL SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION PORTFOLIO EVIDENCE CLUSTERS APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY. Student Name.

Practicum/Internship Handbook. Office of Educational Field Experiences

Master s Degree in Curriculum & Instruction. With Specialization in. Language & Literacy Education. And. Advanced Certification Programs in:

Ayers Institute Leadership Resources: PSEL Alignment

Transcription:

Poudre School District Instructional Coaching Field Guide Contents Purpose for instructional coaching 2 Rationale 2 Roles of instructional coach, principal, educator & coordinator 3 What the role of instructional coach does not include 6 Instructional coaching cycle 7 Instructional coaching playbook & guidelines 9 Measuring the impact of instructional coaching 12 Instructional coach funding 13 Instructional coaching and Multi-Tiered Sytems of Support 13 Instructional coaching & the Standards Based Teaching and Learning Framework 14 Selected bibliography 15

Purpose for instructional coaching Instructional coaches in PSD partner with educators and teams to improve outcomes for students by providing job-embedded professional development that is differentiated, collaborative, and reflective. PSD Coaches: Partner with teams and PLC/data groups to implement School Improvement Plans Partner with educators and students to meet District Ends Partner with educators to sustain implementation of the Standards Based Teaching and Learning Framework (SBTLF) Partner with educators so that students meet or exceed Colorado Academic Standards Reflect PSD s Operating Principles in their daily work Rationale In order to improve outcomes for students, educators need to engage in frequent, focused, positive, useful and humanizing learning experiences (Knight, 2011). Instructional coaches provide support for professional learning that is school-based and job-embedded. Instructional coaches are the bridge between School Improvement Plans and educator classroom practice. The goal of instructional coaching work is to grow the use of high yield instructional strategies by educators and to build the social capital of schools so that educator relationships are characterized by frequent interaction, collaboration and trust (Leana, 2011) and student outcomes increase. At the heart of this work is change, so instructional coach goals focus on building trust and creating partnerships that honor educator status, identity, skills, thinking, and motivation (Knight 2007). The intention of instructional coaching in PSD is that it is done with educators, not to them.

Roles of instructional coach, principals, educators & coordinator Instructional Coach The role of the instructional coach is to understand the complexities of working with adults and consistently apply that knowledge throughout their work (Knight, 2011). Instructional coaches in PSD have a deep understanding of the instructional coaching field guide, and focus their work on increasing educator efficacy through partnership and authentic learning opportunities. Instructional coaches partner with educators to engage in coaching cycles and increase educator use of high yield instructional strategies and build social capital by facilitating and participating in PLC/data teams at their schools. Instructional coaches continuously grow their professional practice and knowledge base by participating in frequent instructional coach specific ongoing learning; district required trainings; self-selecting other professional learning opportunities offered in their building or through PSD professional development; and/or attending outside conferences. Although they work closely with building administration, instructional coaches maintain confidentiality and do not provide evaluative information about educator effectiveness. Principals Principals in PSD understand the field guide and communicate frequently about the power of coaching to facilitate educator professional growth. Principals partner with coaches and as a result create a school culture where social capital is maximized, and professional learning results in increased outcomes for students. Instructional coaches and principals communicate frequently and use partnership agreements that focus the work of instructional coaches and define strategies for enrollment of educators in coaching cycles, expectations of the instructional coach in team PLC/data group facilitation, and clear expectations for the confidentiality of instructional coaching work. Principals and instructional coaches learn side by side about district initiatives, and together develop extensive knowledge of the instructional coach playbook. Principals are primarily responsible for the evaluation of instructional coaches and can expect support in the evaluation process from instructional coach coordinator. Principals provide essential feedback to the instructional coach coordinator on areas of need for professional learning.

Roles of instructional coach, principals, educators & coordinator Educators A partnership between instructional coaches and educators is essential in order to impact students (Knight, 2011). Educators in PSD willingly engage in the coaching cycle in order to grow and improve their teaching practice. Educator choice and voice in is an essential component of the coaching cycle and is honored throughout the partnership between instructional coaches and educators (Killion, Harrison, Bryan, & Clifton, 2012). Educators understand that instructional coaching and any associated conversations are not related to educator evaluation. Educators provide instructional coaches with feedback about their work through surveys and conversations embedded in the coaching cycle (Killion, et. al, 2012). Instructional Coach Coordinator The Instructional Coach Coordinator creates conditions for successful coaching to exist by providing ongoing professional learning for the instructional coach team, communicating and advocating for the instructional coaching model in PSD, coordinating and collaborating with district level teams and stakeholders, serving as a coach of coaches, communicating district initiatives, and supporting principals in selection of instructional coaches and by providing data to inform instructional coach evaluation through observations and debrief with building administrators. The instructional coach coordinator also supports instructional coaching at sites through meetings with the principal and instructional coach(es), throughout the school year.

Roles of instructional coach, principals, educators & coordinator In Taking the Lead: New Roles for Teacher and School-Based Coaches, Joellen Killion and Cindy Harrison identify 10 possible roles for coaches. The instructional coaching model in PSD focuses on the roles below (listed in no particular order): Instructional Specialist* Instructional coaches partner with educators to implement the use of high yield instructional strategies throughout the instructional coaching cycle. Classroom Supporter* Instructional coaches work to increase the quality and effectiveness of classroom instruction for all students by partnering with teachers in the coaching cycle, debriefing instruction or collaboratively planning for the use of high yield instructional strategies. Data Coach* Instructional coaches work with individuals or teams to facilitate conversations, plan for and evaluate data driven instruction. Learning Facilitator Instructional coaches assist in coordinating and designing high quality professional learning at the school level. Learner Instructional coaches consistently seek to improve at the craft of coaching and to increase their knowledge of educational best practices. For further details about instructional coaching roles in PSD, please refer to Instructional Coaches and the Standards Based Teaching and Learning Framework. *Coach facilitation and engagement with educators in the roles of instructional specialist, classroom supporter and data coach is done with the goal of building teacher capacity. Instructional coaches consistently apply the principles of gradual release to increase teacher learning and independence.

What the role of the instructional coach does not include Evaluating teachers Providing information that would be used for evaluation Serving as a substitute teacher Serving as a principal designee Providing instruction for an assigned group of students Performing clerical duties outside of primary job criteria Developing student schedules Developing or preparing school budgets Disciplining students in an administrative capacity Covering school duties beyond a minimal rotation The practice of having instructional coaches serve multiple roles in a building can lead to confusion for educators and coaches. At sites where instructional coaches that also serve in an additional capacity, principals need to clearly communicate the division of duties so that educators do not feel they are being evaluated by someone who is serving as their coach.

Instructional coaching cycle

Instructional coaching cycle Identify Teacher gets a clear picture of current reality by viewing observation data (collected by instructional coach or video) Coach asks questions of the teacher to identify a goal Teacher identifies a student-focused goal Teacher identifies a strategy to meet the goal or collaborates with coach to identify instructional strategy (from PSD Instructional Coach Playbook) Learn Coach shares guidelines for the identified instructional strategy Teacher modifies the guidelines if they wish Teacher chooses an approach to modeling that they would like to observe & identifies a time to watch modeling (in the classroom with or without students, video, peer observation, co-teaching) Coach provides modeling in one or more formats Teacher sets a time to implement the strategy Improve Teacher implements instructional strategy Data is gathered on student progress toward goal (by teacher or coach) Data is gathered on teacher s implementation of the instructional strategy (by teacher or coach in class) Coach and teacher meet to discuss implementation and progress toward the goal Teacher makes modifications until the goal is met

The instructional coach playbook & guidelines Instructional coaches must have extensive knowledge of high yield instructional strategies and structures that are proven to have a positive impact on student outcomes (Knight, 2015). Coaches and teachers draw upon these instructional strategies to meet goals in the coaching cycle. In PSD, these strategies and are organized and referred to as the PSD Instructional Coach Playbook. The playbook is built around PSD s Standards Based Teaching and Learning Framework. The instructional strategies within the playbook are organized around the dimensions of Student Engagement, Curriculum & Pedagogy, Classroom Environment & Culture, Assessment for Student Learning and Purpose. Each instructional strategy in the playbook is accompanied by a resource of guidelines that describe, in detail, its various elements and processes. The playbook was created and is revised annually with collaboration and input from groups across the district such as Curriculum & Instruction, Professional Development, English Language Acquisition and Integrated Services. Instructional coaches and leadership teams at schools use this playbook as a starting point to create school specific playbooks that reflect individual School Improvement Plans and the work of educators within specific settings. See an example playbook and a sample of the guidelines for a specific instructional strategy below. PSD employees may access the instructional coach playbook at http://bit.ly/psdplaybook.

The instructional coach playbook

Guidelines provide clear explanations for instructional strategies in the playbook The instructional coach playbook & guidelines

Measuring the impact of instructional coaching Data is gathered in multiple ways to evaluate the effectiveness of the instructional coaching program in PSD. Specific tools include: Coaching cycle logs that catalog the partnerships coaches develop by tracking the coaching cycles, goals, and number of educators involved in instructional coaching. Teacher surveys are used as a tool for collecting informal data about how instructional coaching meets the needs of educators. Instructional coach Outlook calendar data is used as a dipstick for analyzing coach work in terms of time spent providing formal professional learning, engaging in coaching cycles with educators, facilitating teams/plcs/data groups and other duties.

Instructional coach funding Instructional coaches in PSD are funded through a variety of sources that include federal monies from Title I, Title IIA, and building based budgets. Title 1 funding is federal funding that is allocated based on the poverty rates of enrolled students and is designed to help ensure that all children meet Colorado Academic Standards. Title II, part A funding is designated to be used to design and implement activities that support teacher and principal quality; in Colorado a priority of this funding is to provide job embedded professional development for the purpose of developing effective professional practices and effective implementation of the Colorado Academic Standards (Colorado Department of Education, Fact Sheet). For more information, please contact John McKay with Federal Programs at 970-490-3081. Instructional coaching and Multi-Tiered-System of Supports (MTSS) Instructional coaching is an important component of the Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS). While students receive interventions as a component of targeted and intensive supports (Tier 2, Tier 3), instructional coaching enhances quality instruction delivered at the universal level (Tier 1). By addressing universal instruction through coaching, fewer students will need support at the intensive or strategic level.

Instructional coaching and the Standards Based Teaching and Learning Framework The Standards-Based Teaching and Learning Framework Task Force was inspired and motivated to establish a teaching and learning framework that serves all students. A priority was to create a common set of expectations explicitly identifying the roles of students, educators, administrators, and parents/guardians, knowing that the contributions from each of these groups would be integral to the future success of the framework. The Standards-Based Teaching and Learning Framework (SBTLF) is the collective effort of multiple stakeholder groups who believe in the value of aligned expectations aiming for the highest levels of organizational success. In 2015-2016, a professional learning community made up of diverse coaches from throughout PSD worked to create a common set of expectations of instructional coaches in PSD that is directly aligned to the SBTLF. To access the SBTLF click here. To access the document that pertains specifically to instructional coaching, click here.

Selected bibliography Aguilar, E. (2013). The art of coaching: Effective strategies for school transformation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Overview of Programs, Title 1, Part A., Colorado Department of Education, Accessed 3/30/15. http://www.cde.state.co.us/fedprograms/ov/ index Unit of Federal Program Administration, Title II, Part A, Fact Sheet. Colorado Department of Education, Accessed 3/30/15. http://www.cde. state.co.us/fedprograms/title-ii-part-a-fact-sheet Killion, J. & Harrison, C. (2006). Taking the lead: new roles for teachers and school based coaches. Oxford, OH: NSDC Knight, J., Elford, M., Hock, M., Dunekack, D., Bradley, B., Deshler, D., & Knight, D. (2015). 3 Steps to Great Coaching: A Simple but powerful instructional coaching cycle nets results. JSD, 36(1). Knight, J. (2007). Instructional coaching a partnership approach to improving instruction. Thousand Oaks, CA: NSDC Knight, J. (2015). Teach to Win: Seven success factors for instructional coaching programs. Principal Leadership, 15(7), 24-27. Knight, J. (2011). Unmistakable impact: A partnership approach for dramatically improving instruction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Leana, C. (2011, Fall). The Missing Link in School Reform (Stanford Social Innovation Rreview). Retrieved February 10, 2015. Morel, N. & Stanton-Cushman, C. (2012). How to build an instructional coaching program for maximum capacity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. Sweeney, D. (2011). Student-centered coaching: A guide for K-8 coaches and principals. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.