Original Article. Cancer March 1, 2009 981



From this document you will learn the answers to the following questions:

Was it faster or slower to reach a PSA nadir after the initiation of ADT?

Who was the study conducted on?

What type of disease was Hormone therapy?

Similar documents
7. Prostate cancer in PSA relapse

Issues Concerning Development of Products for Treatment of Non-Metastatic Castration- Resistant Prostate Cancer (NM-CRPC)

Historical Basis for Concern

Advances In Chemotherapy For Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer. TAX 327 study results & SWOG study results presented at ASCO 2004

Detection and staging of recurrent prostate cancer is still one of the important clinical problems in prostate cancer. A rise in PSA or biochemical

Supplementary Online Content

Use of Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) in Localized Prostate Cancer

J Clin Oncol 23: by American Society of Clinical Oncology INTRODUCTION

Before, Frank's immune cells could

An Empirical Evaluation of Guidelines on Prostate-specific Antigen Velocity in Prostate Cancer Detection

Prostatectomy, pelvic lymphadenect. Med age 63 years Mean followup 53 months No other cancer related therapy before recurrence. Negative.

Development of Bone Metastases in Men With Prostate Cancer

PCa Commentary. Volume 73 January-February 2012 PSA AND TREATMENT DECISIONS:

Secondary Hormonal Therapy in Men With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Hormone Therapy: How and When?

Kanıt: Klinik çalışmalarda ZYTIGA

Clinical Trials and Radiation Treatment. Gerard Morton Odette Cancer Centre Sunnybrook Research Institute University of Toronto

Monitoring of Prostate Cancer Patients: Guidelines and Current Practice

SIOG Guidelines Update 2014 Prostate Cancer. Dr Helen Boyle Centre Léon Bérard SIOG meeting 25 October 2014,Lisbon

Prostate Cancer What Are the Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy for High-risk Prostate Cancer?

Updates in Prostate Cancer Therapy Sequencing Strategies. Debates and Didactics in Hematology and Oncology. July 26, 2015.

Thomas de los Reyes PGY 1 Department of Urologic Sciences University of British Columbia. Meet Mr. S

Cancer in Primary Care: Prostate Cancer Screening. How and How often? Should we and in which patients?

Evaluation of Treatment Pathways in Oncology: An Example in mcrpc

4/8/13. Pre-test Audience Response. Prostate Cancer Screening and Treatment of Prostate Cancer: The 2013 Perspective

Surrogate End Point for Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality After Radical Prostatectomy or Radiation Therapy

Understanding the. Controversies of. testosterone replacement. therapy in hypogonadal men with prostate cancer. controversies surrounding

the risk of developing skeletal metastases or local recurrence.

Should we use Docetaxel in hormone- naïve prostate cancer? Karim Fizazi, MD, PhD Institut Gustave Roussy Villejuif, France

Prostate Cancer Screening in Taiwan: a must

Robert Bristow MD PhD FRCPC

People Living with Cancer

First-line Hormone Therapy

Establishing an Advanced Prostate Cancer Clinic: The Rationale

PSA Testing 101. Stanley H. Weiss, MD. Professor, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School. Director & PI, Essex County Cancer Coalition. weiss@umdnj.

Us TOO University Presents: Understanding Diagnostic Testing

Prostate Cancer: Current Approach and Future Perspective in Castration-resistant Cancer Treatment

NATURAL HISTORY OF CLINICALLY STAGED LOW- AND INTERMEDIATE-RISK PROSTATE CANCER TREATED WITH MONOTHERAPEUTIC PERMANENT INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY

A new score predicting the survival of patients with spinal cord compression from myeloma

Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy in prostate cancer impact of PSA level before radiotherapy

Roswell Park scientists and clinicians:

Does my patient need more therapy after prostate cancer surgery?

Prostate Cancer Screening: Are We There Yet? March 2010 Andrew M.D. Wolf, MD University of Virginia School of Medicine

Therapy in Prostate Cancer: Cure or Regression

What s new in prostate cancer research? Highlights of GU-ASCO 2014

Use Of Testosterone In Men With Prostate Cancer. Traditional view: T is dangerous for PCa

2010 SITE REPORT St. Joseph Hospital PROSTATE CANCER

POLICY PRODUCT VARIATIONS DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND RATIONALE DEFINITIONS BENEFIT VARIATIONS DISCLAIMER CODING INFORMATION REFERENCES POLICY HISTORY

Department of Urology, Erasmus MC, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Role of Radiation after Radical Prostatectomy Review of Literature

JAMA. 1998;280:

Gleason Score. Oncotype DX GPS. identified for. about surveillance. time to get sophisticated

The 4Kscore blood test for risk of aggressive prostate cancer

Analysis of Prostate Cancer at Easter Connecticut Health Network Using Cancer Registry Data

Oncology Annual Report: Prostate Cancer 2005 Update By: John Konefal, MD, Radiation Oncology

Prostate cancer. Christopher Eden. The Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford & The Hampshire Clinic, Old Basing.

Prostate Cancer Treatment: What s Best for You?

馬 偕 紀 念 醫 院 新 竹 分 院 前 列 腺 癌 放 射 治 療 指 引

Published Ahead of Print on April 16, 2012 as /JCO J Clin Oncol by American Society of Clinical Oncology INTRODUCTION

Early stage prostate cancer: biochemical recurrence after treatment

A new score predicting the survival of patients with spinal cord compression from myeloma

A New Biomarker in Prostate Cancer Care: Oncotype Dx. David M Albala, MD Chief of Urology Crouse Hospital Syracuse, NY

2015 ASCO Conference Highlights for PCa Patients: May 29-June 2 Chicago, IL. Howard R. Soule, PhD

Drug costs in the management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in Canada

Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Leads to Survival Benefit Only in Patients with High-Risk Prostate Cancer: a Population-Based Study

Treatment strategies for high-risk locally advanced prostate cancer

PSA After Radiation for Prostate Cancer

Beyond the PSA: Genomic Testing in Localized Prostate Cancer

Prostate-Specific Antigen Based Screening: Controversy and Guidelines

Cancer research in the Midland Region the prostate and bowel cancer projects

Temporal Trends in Demographics and Overall Survival of Non Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients at Moffitt Cancer Center From 1986 to 2008

Komorbide brystkræftpatienter kan de tåle behandling? Et registerstudie baseret på Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group

M.Kirienko1; E.Incerti2; A.Fodor3; G.Berardi3; C.Fiorino4; E.Busnardo2; P.Mapelli2; R.Calandrino4; N.Di Muzio3; L.Gianolli2; M.

Advances in Diagnostic and Molecular Testing in Prostate Cancer

A STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF RULES FOR BIOCHEMICAL FAILURE AFTER RADIOTHERAPY IN MEN TREATED FOR PROSTATE CANCER

These rare variants often act aggressively and may respond differently to therapy than the more common prostate adenocarcinoma.

Tips for surviving the analysis of survival data. Philip Twumasi-Ankrah, PhD

NCCN Prostate Cancer Guidelines Update. James L. Mohler, MD Roswell Park Cancer Institute

Clinical Progression to Castration-Recurrent Prostate Cancer

Update on Prostate Cancer: Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment Making Sense of the Noise and Directions Forward

Advances in Prostate Cancer (Localized to Newly metastatic) Christopher Sweeney, MBBS Dana Farber Cancer Institute

Breast cancer close to the nipple: Does this carry a higher risk ofaxillary node metastasesupon diagnosis?

PROTON THERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER: THE INITIAL LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY EXPERIENCE

In 2006 approximately 234,000 men were diagnosed with

Prostate Cancer Screening Guideline

Prostate Cancer Screening. Dr. J. McCracken, Urologist

Clinical Trial Designs for Firstline Hormonal Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer

Local Coverage Determination (LCD): MolDX: Genomic Health Oncotype DX Prostate Cancer Assay (L36153)

PSA Screening for Prostate Cancer Information for Care Providers

If several different trials are mentioned in one publication, the data of each should be extracted in a separate data extraction form.

American Urological Association (AUA) Guideline

The 4Kscore blood test for risk of aggressive prostate cancer

PROSTATE CANCER. Learning Objectives. Question 4/3/2014

LOW LEVELS OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN PREDICT LONG-TERM RISK OF PROSTATE CANCER: RESULTS FROM THE BALTIMORE LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF AGING

THE MANY FACES OF MCRPC: ASSESSING PATIENT PROFILES AND TAILORING TREATMENT IN A CHANGING THERAPEUTIC LANDSCAPE

The NCPE has issued a recommendation regarding the use of pertuzumab for this indication. The NCPE does not recommend reimbursement of pertuzumab.

Prostate Cancer 2014

Integrating Chemotherapy and Liver Surgery for the Management of Colorectal Metastases

Impact of radiation therapy on survival in patients with triple negative breast cancer

Prostate cancer is the most common cause of death from cancer in men over age 75. Prostate cancer is rarely found in men younger than 40.

Transcription:

Time to Prostate-Specific Antigen Nadir Independently Predicts Overall Survival in Patients Who Have Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Treated With Androgen-Deprivation Therapy Toni K. Choueiri, MD, Wanling Xie, MS, Anthony V. D Amico, MD, Robert W. Ross, MD, Jim C. Hu, MD, Mark Pomerantz, MD, Meredith M. Regan, PhD, Mary-Ellen Taplin, MD, Philip W. Kantoff, MD, Oliver Sartor, MD, and William K. Oh, MD BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the relation between the kinetics of prostatespecific antigen (PSA) decline after the initiation of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) and overall survival (OS) in men with metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC). METHODS: The authors institutional database was used to identify a cohort of men with metastatic HSPC who were treated with ADT. Patients were included if they had at least 2 serum PSA determinations before PSA nadir and at least 1 serum PSA value available within 1 month of ADT initiation. Patient characteristics, PSA at ADT initiation, nadir PSA, time to PSA nadir (TTN), and PSA decline (PSAD) in relation to OS were analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-nine patients were identified, and they had a median follow-up after ADT initiation of 4 years. The median OS after ADT initiation was 7 years. The median PSA level at ADT initiation and PSA nadir were 47 ng/ml and 0.28 ng/ml, respectively. On univariate analysis: TTN <6 months, PSAD >52 ng/ ml per year, PSA nadir 0.2 ng/ml, PSA 47.2 ng/ml at ADT initiation, and Gleason score >7 were associated with shorter OS. On multivariate analysis, TTN <6 months, Gleason score >7, and PSA nadir 0.2 ng/ ml independently predicted shorter OS. CONCLUSIONS: To the authors knowledge, this was the first report to demonstrate that a faster time to reach a PSA nadir after the initiation of ADT was associated with shorter survival duration in men with metastatic HSPC. These results need confirmation but may indicate that a rapid initial response to ADT indicates more aggressive disease. Cancer 2009;115:981 7. VC 2009 American Cancer Society. KEY WORDS: prostate cancer, androgen-deprivation therapy, hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer, prostate-specific antigen kinetics, time to prostate-specific antigen nadir. Corresponding author: Toni K. Choueiri, MD, 44 Binney Street, Dana 1230, Boston, MA 02115; Fax: (617) 632-2165; toni_choueiri@dfci.harvard.edu Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts Received: June 10, 2008; Revised: July 20, 2008; Accepted: July 23, 2008 Published online: January 17, 2009, VC 2009 American Cancer Society DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24064, www.interscience.wiley.com Cancer March 1, 2009 981

Androgen -deprivation therapy (ADT) is the most effective systemic therapy for patients who have hormonesensitive prostate cancer (HSPC). Most patients will experience a substantial decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, and PSA levels may remain low or undetectable for years. Nevertheless, the emergence of castrationresistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is typical. 1 Once CRPC develops, the median survival is approximately 24 to 36 months. PSA kinetics have been established as useful prognostic indicators for survival in different clinical settings. For instance, a high pretherapy PSA velocity (PSAV) is associated with a greater risk of death from prostate cancer despite radical prostatectomy 2 or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). 3 Similarly, the PSA doubling time with biochemical recurrence after definitive local therapy is able to identify patients who are at high risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality. 4 However, the influence of PSA kinetics post-adt initiation on the outcome of patients with metastatic HSPC is poorly characterized. A recent large study suggested that a PSA level 4 ng/ml after 7 months of ADT is a strong predictor of survival in this population. 5 We queried a longitudinal database of patients who were treated at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) to describe the outcome of ADT use in men with HSPC who had metastases at the time ADT was initiated. Our objective was to determine which parameters of PSA kinetics predicted overall survival (OS). MATERIALS AND METHODS Database The cohort was generated from the Prostate Clinical Research Information System (CRIS) at DFCI. The CRIS system consists of data entry software, a central data repository, collection of patient data (including comprehensive follow-up of all patients), and tightly integrated security measures. This system recently was described. 6 Data are stored in an Oracle relational database (Oracle, Inc., Redwood Shores, Calif). The current version of Prostate CRIS became available for prospective data entry in November 2001. All patients who are seen at DFCI and Brigham and Women s Hospital with a diagnosis of prostate cancer are approached to participate. The consent rate is >85%. In general, patients are followed every 3 months with PSA tests and radiologic examinations if needed. Patient Selection We identified and included patients with prostate cancer who had been treated with ADT (orchiectomy or luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists with or without an antiandrogen) for metastatic HSPC. Patients had consented to provide information on the CRIS protocol and had blood collected for research purposes. Patients were eligible if they had metastatic disease when they started ADT, if they had at least 1 PSA value within 1 month before the initiation of ADT (84.4% of all patients) or after ADT initiation (15.6% of all patients), and if they had at least 2 PSA values available before nadir PSA (including nadir PSA). Patients were excluded either if they had only 2 PSA values available and the second value was obtained >1 year after the first measure or if their PSA level increased after ADT initiation. Statistical Considerations Patient and disease characteristics were summarized as the number (%) of patients or the median and range of values. The time to PSA nadir (TTN) was defined as the duration of time from the initiation of ADT to the date the lowest PSA value first was observed after ADT. PSA decline (PSAD) was calculated from the slope of the linear regression of the raw PSA values over time using PSA values from 1 month before ADT to the nadir PSA. The primary outcome variable was OS, which was defined as the time from ADT initiation to the date of death, and patients were censored at the last known date that they were alive. The distribution of OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method; median survival and OS along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were summarized. OS was compared according to patients characteristics using log-rank tests. Continuous variables were dichotomized at the median value within the cohort with the exception of PSA nadir, which was dichotomized at 0.2 ng/ml because of its known correlation with prostate cancer-specific survival. Because PSA nadir, TTN, and PSAD were measures that developed over time after ADT initiation, we also conducted secondary analyses of OS from the landmarks of PSA nadir on 982 Cancer March 1, 2009

PSA Nadir Predicts HSPC Survival/Choueiri et al Table 1. Patient and Disease Characteristics of the Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Cohort at the Initiation of Androgen-Deprivation Therapy (N¼179) Characteristic No. of Patients (%) Median IQR At diagnosis Clinical T3 tumor 10 (5.6) Clinical M1 status 58 (32.4) Clinical N1 status 25 (14) Biopsy Gleason >7 84 (46.9) Definitive local therapy (RP or RT) 85 (47.5) Hormone therapy for local disease 21 (11.7) At ADT initiation Age, y 64 57-70 Time from diagnosis to ADT, y 0.3 0.1-4.9 PSA at ADT initiation, ng/ml 47.2 12.3-167 Orchiectomy 1/2 LHRH analog 11 (6.1) Intermittent LHRH 5 (2.9) LHRH and antiandrogen 144 (80.4) During ADT Nadir PSA during ADT, ng/ml 0.28 0.01-1.66 Time to PSA nadir, mo 6.0 3.1-9.8 PSAD after ADT, ng/ml/y 52 15-271 IQR indicates interquartile range; T, tumor classification; M, metastasis classification; N, lymph node status; RP, radical prostatectomy; RT, radiotherapy; ADT, androgen-deprivation therapy; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; þ/, with or without; LHRH: luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone; PSAD: PSA decline. ADT (postnadir OS) and 1 year after ADT initiation. Multivariate modeling was undertaken to arrive at a parsimonious model to predict OS; hazard ratios (HRs), 95% CIs, and Wald chi-square test P values were reported from the models. The statistical analysis was undertaken using SAS software (version 9; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) and P values <.05 (2-sided) were considered statistically significant. RESULTS Patient Characteristics and Prostate-Specific Antigen Kinetics One-hundred seventy-nine patients met the eligibility criteria for this analysis (Table 1). The median age of the cohort at ADT initiation was 64 years (range, 42-84 years). Forty-seven percent of patients had a Gleason score >7, and 32% of patients had metastatic disease (M1) at diagnosis. The median time from diagnosis to the initiation of ADT was 0.3 years (interquartile range [IQR], 0.1-4.9 years). Eighty percent of patients received an antiandrogen as part of ADT. The median PSA level at ADT initiation was 47 ng/ml, and the median PSA nadir was 0.28 ng/ml; 45% of patients reached a PSA nadir <0.2 ng/ ml. The median TTN was 6 months, and the median PSAD level after the initiation of ADT was 52 ng/ml per year. The PSA levels at the start of ADT were similar between the groups with short (<6 months) and prolonged (6 months) TTN (median, 31 ng/ml vs 55.6 ng/ml; P ¼.21). However, the group with rapid PSAD (>52 ng/ml per year) had much higher baseline PSA levels compared with the group with slow PSAD (median, 146 ng/ml vs 12.5 ng/ml; P <.0001). Patients who had a rapid PSAD or shorter TTN also were less likely to achieve a PSA nadir <0.2 ng/ml (P <.05). Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of Predictors for Overall Survival With a median follow-up of 4 years (range, 0.3-13.6 years), 63 patients (35%) patients died. The median OS after ADT initiation was 7 years (95% CI, 4.9-9.4 years; range, 0.3-13.6 years). Table 2 summarizes survival estimates at 1-year intervals after the initiation of ADT. Several factors were identified that predicted OS after the initiation of ADT on univariate analysis (Table 3). Cancer March 1, 2009 983

A Gleason score >7, higher PSA at the initiation of ADT, higher PSA nadir, shorter TTN, and a more rapid PSAD all were associated with a shorter OS. Figure 1 provides OS curves that were calculated according to TTN (<6 months vs 6 months; log-rank P ¼.01) and PSAD (<52 ng/ml per year vs 52 ng/ml per year; log-rank P ¼.0012). Secondary landmark analyses that compared postnadir survival among patient groups defined by these variables or that compared survival for those who had been alive for at least 1 year after ADT initiation were Table 2. Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Overall Survival at Yearly Intervals After the Initiation of Androgen Deprivation Therapy Time After ADT, y OS Rate, % 95% CI, % 1 96 92-98 2 90 84-94 3 84 77-89 4 71 62-78 5 59 49-68 ADT indicatess androgen-deprivation therapy; OS, overall survival; CI, confidence interval. consistent with our initial results. It is noteworthy that previous local therapy (radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy) was associated with OS on univariate analysis (P ¼.009) but not on multivariate analysis (P ¼.98). In multivariate analysis, statistically significant predictors for OS were PSA nadir, TTN, and Gleason score. Higher PSA nadir (0.2 ng/ml), shorter TTN (<6 months), and higher Gleason (>7) were associated with shorter survival (Table 4, Model 1). We also investigated whether the association of TTN with OS was modified by the levels of PSA nadir (Table 4, Model 2). The results indicated that the relation between prolonged TTN and improved survival became more apparent in patients who had a PSA nadir 0.2 ng/ml (hazard ratio [HR], 0.31; 95% CI, 0.16-0.62). However, in the group of patients who had a PSA nadir <0.2 ng/ml, TTN had no influence on survival (HR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.42-2.40; interaction effect, P ¼.04). A Kaplan-Meier plot of survival by PSA nadir and TTN (Fig. 2) indicated that the 2 survival distributions (TTN 6 months vs TTN <6 months) crossed, and there was a lot of early censoring among patients who had a PSA nadir <0.2 ng/ml, which Table 3. Univariate Analysis of Factors That Predicted Overall Survival From the Initiation of Androgen-Deprivation Therapy and From Alternative Landmark Time Points OS after ADT, N5179 OS in Patients Who Were Alive >1 Year After ADT, N5159 Postnadir OS, N5179 Variable Median, y P Median, y P Median, y P All patients 7.0 Biopsy Gleason 7 7.0.005 >7 5.2 Unknown 3.8 PSA at ADT initiation, ng/ml <47.2 7.8.036 47.2 5.2 PSA nadir, ng/ml <0.2 10.7 <.0001 10.7 <.0001 9.6 <.0001 0.2 4.7 4.8 4.0 TTN, mo <6 4.5.010 4.6.020 4.3.075 6 7.8 7.8 7.3 PSAD, ng/ml/y >52 4.9.001 4.9.001 4.3.002 52 7.8 7.8 7.9 OS indicates overall survival; ADT, androgen-deprivation therapy; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; TTN, time to PSA nadir; PSAD, PSA decline. 984 Cancer March 1, 2009

PSA Nadir Predicts HSPC Survival/Choueiri et al suggested that the association between survival and TTN remained unclear in patients who achieved a very low nadir in this cohort. The results were consistent when variables were analyzed on a continuous basis rather than dichotomized (data not shown). FIGURE 1. Overall survival from the initiation of androgendeprivation therapy (ADT) according to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline (PSAD) (top) and the time to PSA nadir (TTN) (bottom). DISCUSSION In 2007, the American Society of Clinical Oncology published clinical practice guidelines on the initial hormone management of androgen-sensitive, metastatic prostate cancer. 7 ADT remains the mainstay of treatment for men with metastatic HSPC. PSA kinetics before definitive curative-intent therapy and during biochemical recurrence when these therapies fail are established prognostic factors associated with outcome. 2,3,8 Petrylak et al observed that a decline in PSA velocity after beginning treatment with docetaxel chemotherapy, were associated with OS. 9 An analysis from the TAX327 trial of docetaxel versus mitoxantrone in metastatic, hormone-refractory prostate cancer 10 demonstrated that a PSAD 30% within 3 months of initiating chemotherapy had the highest degree of surrogacy for OS, confirming data from the Southwest Oncology Group 9916 trial. By using data from a randomized phase 3 trial, Hussain et al recently reported that a PSA value 4ng/mL after 7 months of ADT was a strong independent predictor of improved survival in new, metastatic HSPC. 5 Table 4. Multivariate Models Predicting Overall Survival Variable HR 95% CI P Model 1: Main effects only Biopsy Gleason (>7vs 7) 1.92 1.103.37.022 Biopsy Gleason (unknown vs 7) 2.72 1.196.21.018 PSA nadir ( 0.2 ng/ml vs <0.2 ng/ml) 3.85 2.126.99 <.0001 TTN ( 6 movs <6 mo) 0.48 0.280.80.005 Model 2: Investigating interaction Biopsy Gleason (>7vs 7) 1.83 1.053.21.034 Biopsy Gleason (unknown vs 7) 2.42 1.065.54.036 Nadir <0.2 ng/ml TTN <6mo 1.00 (Reference) TTN 6mo 1.00 0.422.40.041* Nadir 0.2 ng/ml TTN <6mo 1.00 (Reference) TTN 6mo 0.31 0.160.62 HR indicates hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; TTN, time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA). *The Wald chi-square test was used to test the interaction between nadir PSA and TTN. Cancer March 1, 2009 985

FIGURE 2. Overall survival according to the nadir prostatespecific antigen (PSA) and the time to PSA nadir (TTN). Those results may allow the identification of patients who are unlikely to benefit with standard ADT long before they develop castration-resistant disease, thus providing an alternative to investigating newer therapies. Unfortunately, the influence of PSA kinetics like PSAD, TTN, and others as predictors of survival in patients with metastatic but HSPC remains largely unknown. Most studies have evaluated PSA responses 5,11,12 as a surrogate for survival. Overall, the efficacy of ADT has been correlated with more profound PSADs that reflect subsequently improved survival. In our dataset, a lower PSA nadir, as expected, was associated independently with longer survival. We also attempted to examine other parameters of PSA kinetics to refine the predictive information in this context. It is noteworthy that a more rapid PSAD and a shorter TTN (a cutoff of 6 months was used for convenience, because this was the median value) were associated with shorter survival, and TTN was associated independently with survival even after adjusting for several other variables. We believed that it was reasonable to assume that a rapid PSAD and reaching PSA nadir faster would indicate more cancer cell death that, subsequently, would translate into a higher survival, similar to the data regarding docetaxel chemotherapy in hormone-refractory disease. 9 Because of our findings, we hypothesize that perhaps this is an ADT-specific phenomenon only; the rapid fall in PSA may not be related to cell viability and simply may be a transcriptional effect from ADT on PSA production rather than cell death. Another possible explanation is that we may have selected a subset of aggressive prostate cancer cells that quickly became resistant to ADT or were not as reliant on the androgen receptor for viability. In fact, significant clinical heterogeneity may exist in metastatic HSPC, as supported by the data of Hussain et al, who observed a striking variability in survival: Patients in their study had median survival differences that ranged from 13 months to 75 months, depending on the absolute PSA nadir achieved. In the current study, the association between TTN and survival was limited only to patients who had a PSA nadir >0.2 ng/ml. We also attempted to examine the length of time from the initiation of ADT to the first documentation of a PSA level 0.2 ng/ml, because some investigators equate a PSA level 0.2 ng/ml with an undetectable PSA, especially with less sensitive PSA assays. By using this alternative definition, the results were not different for patients who did not achieve a PSA nadir 0.2 ng/ml. However, there was no association between TTN and survival for those who were able to achieve a PSA nadir 0.2 ng/ml after ADT. The relation between TTN and survival deserves further investigation in patients with a lower PSA nadir. Rapid PSAD predicted a worse survival in the univariate analysis but did not retain its importance in the multivariate models when we included Gleason score, PSA nadir, and TTN. We also observed a strong association between PSAD and PSA at the start of ADT. Although the variability in PSA was relatively large (range, 0-15,090 ng/ml; IQR, 12.3-167 ng/ml) at the initiation of ADT, nearly 75% of patients in this cohort achieved a PSA level 3 ng/ml within 6 months of ADT. Therefore, the rate of PSAD was determined primarily by the PSA level at ADT initiation. To our knowledge, our findings have not been reported previously in studies of ADT. This report is the first to use PSA kinetics (such as TTN) outcome measure to evaluate ADT efficacy in metastatic HSPC. This analysis has some potential pitfalls. First, it is retrospective. The measurements of PSA kinetics will depend on the number and the pattern of PSA testing post-adt initiation. The quality of the data, however, should be high, because we performed a quality-control analysis and observed the numbers of available PSA values at 6 months of ADT were similar between the groups with shorter and longer 986 Cancer March 1, 2009

PSA Nadir Predicts HSPC Survival/Choueiri et al TTN. Second, although all patients had metastatic HSPC, this analysis also drew on patients with heterogeneous clinical backgrounds that were not controlled for in the context of a prospective clinical trial. Some important factors, such as lactate dehydrogenase, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and hemoglobin, were not included in this analysis, because they are not measured routinely in patients who receive ADT at our institution. Finally, we did not study patients who never received ADT or those who received antiandrogens alone; however, we believe that those patients represent rare case scenarios. To summarize, we observed that PSA kinetics at the initiation of ADT could predict OS in patients with metastatic HSPC and that faster TTN and more rapid PSAD were associated with a shorter OS. We postulate that this may be a consequence of underlying biologic differences in tumor heterogeneity. Further prospective data and external validation in independent datasets are needed to confirm these finding. Conflict of Interest Disclosures Supported by the Gelb Center for Translational Research (P.W.K., W.K.O.), the Bing Sound Wong Fund for Prostate Cancer Research (W.K.O.), and the Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Center Prostate Cancer Specialized Program of Research Excellence (NCI 5P50CA90381). References 1. Taplin ME. Drug insight: role of the androgen receptor in the development and progression of prostate cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2007;4:236-244. 2. D Amico AV, Chen MH, Roehl KA, Catalona WJ. Preoperative PSA velocity and the risk of death from prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:125-135. 3. D Amico AV, Renshaw AA, Sussman B, Chen MH. Pretreatment PSA velocity and risk of death from prostate cancer following external beam radiation therapy. JAMA. 2005;294:440-447. 4. Zhou P, Chen MH, McLeod D, Carroll PR, Moul JW, D Amico AV. Predictors of prostate cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:6992-6998. 5. Hussain M, Tangen CM, Higano C, et al. Absolute prostate-specific antigen value after androgen deprivation is a strong independent predictor of survival in new metastatic prostate cancer: data from Southwest Oncology Group Trial 9346 (INT-0162). J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:3984-3990. 6. Oh WK, Hayes J, Evan C, et al. Development of an integrated prostate cancer research information system. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2006;5:61-66. 7. Loblaw DA, Virgo KS, Nam R, et al. Initial hormonal management of androgen-sensitive metastatic, recurrent, or progressive prostate cancer: 2006 update of an American Society of Clinical Oncology practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1596-1605. 8. D Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, et al. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 1998;280:969-974. 9. Petrylak DP, Ankerst DP, Jiang CS, et al. Evaluation of prostate-specific antigen declines for surrogacy in patients treated on SWOG 99-16. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:516-521. 10. Armstrong AJ, Garrett-Mayer E, Ou Yang YC, et al. Prostate-specific antigen and pain surrogacy analysis in metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3965-3970. 11. Collette L, Burzykowski T, Carroll KJ, Newling D, Morris T, Schroder FH. Is prostate-specific antigen a valid surrogate endpoint for survival in hormonally treated patients with metastatic prostate cancer? Joint research of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, the Limburgs Universitair Centrum, and AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:6139-6148. 12. Oosterlinck W, Mattelaer J, Casselman J, Van Velthoven R, Derde MP, Kaufman L. PSA evolution: a prognostic factor during treatment of advanced prostatic carcinoma with total androgen blockade. Data from a Belgian multicentric study of 546 patients. Acta Urol Belg. 1997;65:63-71. Cancer March 1, 2009 987